Figure 1 Photo of an Upgraded Low Band Receiver

Similar documents
2 Gain Variation from the Receiver Output through the IF Path

Summary Report / EVLA FE PDR

Ku-Band Receiver System for SHAO

EVLA Front-End CDR. Plans for S (2-4), X (8-12) & Ku (12-18 GHz) Receiver Bands

EVLA Memo 105. Phase coherence of the EVLA radio telescope

MWA REVB LNA Measurements

Valon Synthesizer RFI Test Report

PA FAN PLATE ASSEMBLY 188D6127G1 SYMBOL PART NO. DESCRIPTION. 4 SBS /10 Spring nut. 5 19A702339P510 Screw, thread forming, flat head.

Receivers for. FFRF Tutorial by Tom Clark, NASA/GSFC & NVI Wettzell, March 19, 2009

MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY HAYSTACK OBSERVATORY WESTFORD, MASSACHUSETTS

EVLA Receivers PDR. (4m, P,) L, S, C BAND RECEIVERS. AuthorDaniel (Mert) Mertely

The Precision Spherical Dipole Source

Millimeter Wave Product Catalogue VivaTech Consulting S.A.R.L.

COAXIAL TRANSMISSION LINE COMMON-MODE CURRENT

Maintenance Manual LBI-38531G MHz, 110 WATT POWER AMPLIFIER 19D902797G1 DESCRIPTION TABLE OF CONTENTS

EVLA Front-End CDR. EVLA Ka-Band (26-40 GHz) Receiver

Holography Transmitter Design Bill Shillue 2000-Oct-03

ModBox - Spectral Broadening Unit

LightWork Memo 6: LNA Config. - Rev 6

EVLA Memo # 194 EVLA Ka-band Receiver Down Converter Module Harmonics: The Mega-Birdie at MHz

Amplitude Calibration - Measuring Antenna Temperature R.S. Flagg, RF Associates, March 2012 Radio-SkyPipe Units (SPU)

GainMaker High Output Node 5-40/ MHz

5 RECEIVERS TABLE TBD: EVLA RECEIVER FREQUENCY RANGES AND OPERATING TEMPERATURES

A Method for Gain over Temperature Measurements Using Two Hot Noise Sources

Low Cost Mixer for the 10.7 to 12.8 GHz Direct Broadcast Satellite Market

GainMaker Optoelectronic Node 1 GHz with 42/54 MHz Split

GainMaker Optoelectronic Node 1 GHz with 42/54 MHz Split

Data Digitization & Transmission Session Moderator: Chris Langley

VLA Lowband. Frazer Owen

Technician License Course Chapter 3 Types of Radios and Radio Circuits. Module 7

EVLA Memo 173 Strut-Straddling Arrays for the VLA 4-meter Observing System

LWA Station Design. S. Ellingson, Virginia Tech N. Kassim, U.S. Naval Research Laboratory. URSI General Assembly Chicago Aug 11, 2008 JPL

GPS/GNSS Front-End Amplifier

C-Band Redundant LNA Systems

Optimizing 16 db Capture Effect to Overcome Class A 'Channelized' Signal Booster Group Delay problems within Public Safety Communications Systems

TFD Array Modification: Dual Two Element Vertical Stacked Yagi Larry Dodd K4LED Observatory (October 29, 2017) Abstract

INTEGRATED MICROWAVE ASSEMBLIES PRODUCT GUIDE

Preliminary Users Manual for the Self Contained Return Loss and Cable Fault Test Set with Amplified Wideband Noise Source Copyright 2001 Bryan K.

X-Band Redundant LNA Systems

Using Frequency Diversity to Improve Measurement Speed Roger Dygert MI Technologies, 1125 Satellite Blvd., Suite 100 Suwanee, GA 30024

Redundant LNA Systems

Portable Passive Intermodulation Test Set

Specifications for the GBT spectrometer

Integrated receivers for mid-band SKA. Suzy Jackson Engineer, Australia Telescope National Facility

EVLA Memo #119 Wide-Band Sensitivity and Frequency Coverage of the EVLA and VLA L-Band Receivers

NEWTON TRAINING (2018):

IN propagation path between the satellite and

RF Components Product Catalogue

VHF testing 05 May 10-12

VLA Electronics Memo # 244. Fiber Optic Transmitter/Receiver Duplication for the Pie Town Link. Kurt Caviggia August 15, 2002

1:1 AND 1:2 REDUNDANT LOW-NOISE AMPLIFIER SYSTEMS

Integrated receivers for mid-band SKA. Suzy Jackson Engineer, Australia Telescope National Facility

The Phased Array Feed Receiver System : Linearity, Cross coupling and Image Rejection

Canadian Radio Astronomy Issues

White Paper MHz RF Amplifier Design

EVLA Memo #166 Comparison of the Performance of the 3-bit and 8-bit Samplers at C (4 8 GHz), X (8 12 GHz) and Ku (12 18 GHz) Bands

KWM-2/2A Transceiver THE COLLINS KWM-2/2A TRANSCEIVER

INSTALLATION and OPERATION INSTRUCTIONS. FOR FiberLink BI-DIRECTIONAL AMPLIFIER WITH DIVERSITY MW-FBDA-800AB-50W-DIV

EVLA Front-End CDR. Overview & System Requirements

FCC ID: A3LSLS-BD106Q. Report No.: HCT-RF-1801-FC003. Plot Data for Output Port 2_QPSK 9 khz ~ 150 khz Middle channel 150 khz ~ 30 MHz Low channel

AVN Training HartRAO 2016

Cisco Enhanced Digital Return (EDR) 85 System Compact Segmentable Nodes

RECEIVER MULTICOUPLER AND R.F. PRESELECTORS

FEU (Front End Unit) for Optic Repeater

Active Impedance Matched Dual-Polarization Phased Array Feed for the GBT

Active Antennas: The Next Step in Radio and Antenna Evolution

SC5307A/SC5308A 100 khz to 6 GHz RF Downconverter. Datasheet SignalCore, Inc.

This article provides a new design configuration that uses the basic concept of the RFAL distortion cancellation technique.

Gain Lab. Image interference during downconversion. Images in Downconversion. Course ECE 684: Microwave Metrology. Lecture Gain and TRL labs

BDA Bi-Directional Amplifier

EVLA System Commissioning Results

Improved Ionospheric Propagation With Polarization Diversity, Using A Dual Feedpoint Cubical Quad Loop

User Manual CXE Rev.002 Broadband Cable Networks March 3, (10) CXX Series. User Manual. Teleste Corporation CXE880.

When input, output and feedback voltages are all symmetric bipolar signals with respect to ground, no biasing is required.

Antennas and Receivers in Radio Astronomy

The VLA Low-band Ionospheric and Transient Experiment (VLITE)

EVLA Memo 146 RFI Mitigation in AIPS. The New Task UVRFI

EVLA Memo 172 The Modified J-Pole Antenna

Title: New High Efficiency Intermodulation Cancellation Technique for Single Stage Amplifiers.

CUSTOM INTEGRATED ASSEMBLIES

ULTRA BROADBAND RF over FIBER Transceiver OZ1606 Series Premium Grade 6 GHz

Detrimental Interference Levels at Individual LWA Sites LWA Engineering Memo RFS0012

750 MHz Magnamax series

AOM/EOM Driver. Description. Specifications

ARRAY CONFIGURATION AND TOTAL POWER CALIBRATION FOR LEDA

Module 8 Theory. dbs AM Detector Ring Modulator Receiver Chain. Functional Blocks Parameters. IRTS Region 4

Longer baselines and how it impacts the ALMA Central LO

EVLA Memo 151 EVLA Antenna Polarization at L, S, C, and X Bands

SC5407A/SC5408A 100 khz to 6 GHz RF Upconverter. Datasheet. Rev SignalCore, Inc.

The Sardinia Radio Telescope conversion, distribution, and receiver control system

Development of a noval Switched Beam Antenna for Communications

Task Progress Milestone Summary. Page 1

Wide-Band Imaging. Outline : CASS Radio Astronomy School Sept 2012 Narrabri, NSW, Australia. - What is wideband imaging?

INSTALLATION AND OPERATING MANUAL

Bias-T Design Considerations for the LWA Brian Hicks and Bill Erickson May 21, 2008

Antenna and Analog Beamformer

Measuring Photonic, Optoelectronic and Electro optic S parameters using an advanced photonic module

1GHz low voltage LNA, mixer and VCO

16 Port. RF Multicoupler User s Guide 16 PORT RFM

More Radio Astronomy

Transcription:

NATIONAL RADIO ASTRONOMY OBSERVATORY SOCORRO, NEW MEXICO EVLA TECHNICAL REPORT #175 LOW BAND RECEIVER PERFORMANCE SEPTMBER 27, 2013 S.DURAND, P.HARDEN Upgraded low band receivers, figure 1, were installed in the VLA antennas in 2013. This memo describes the performance specifications and the performance obtained. NRL has an important history of support and use of NRAO s 74 MHz and 330 MHz narrow-band "legacy" systems on the VLA. These systems have been used successfully for research in areas of Navy interest including astrophysics, ionospheric physics, and related technical areas such as ionospheric calibration and modeling, RFI mitigation, and wide-field imaging. These legacy systems have also attracted a rich variety of astronomical investigations from the international community of VLA users. Figure 1 Photo of an Upgraded Low Band Receiver

The Low Band Receiver has four input channels and a single output channel per IF (two per receiver). The receivers are mounted in the antenna apex, Figure 2. The P-band and 4-Band dipoles are mounted below the antenna apex and the output cables are routed to their respective amplifier sections. Unused Inputs 2 APEX Ambient Temp Receiver P-Band Feed 4-Band Feed Vertex room EVLA T301 Up converter Figure 2, Single Receiver, ambient environment Each signal is amplified, filtered and combined prior to the final output amplifier section of the receiver, figure 3. The receiver is deigned to operate at ambient temperatures and employs a temperature controlled noise source. Only two channels per IF are presently used allowing two additional channels for future growth. 2

P-Band 1 2 Copper heatsink 230-470 MHz Spare A 3 4 b f b c d Polarization 1 Spare B 5 6 c g f g h Polarization 2 Couplers d 4-Band 50-86 MHz h 6 5 4 3 2 1 Noise Source Figure 3 Summed output of 4-Band and P-Band The specifications for the Low Band receiver are shown in table 1. Each of the receiver input channels have different filters and LNAs. Input #1 is designed for 4-Band. Input Channel 4 is designed for P-Band. The receiver has an input passband in both 4-Band and P-band which is wider than the LO/IF system of the EVLA antenna. The restricted bandpasses are shown in parentheses in table 1. The output of the Low Band Receiver is the sum of the four input channels and has a passband of 50MHz - 1024 MHz. 3

Table 1, Low Band Receiver Specifications Input 1-4-band 50-86 MHz (EVLA 68-86 MHz) Input 2 Spare Input 3 Spare (120-175MHz) Input 4 - P-band 230-470 MHz (EVLA 230-436 MHz) Total Output power -55dBm (50MHz to 1024 MHz) RF Signal Combiner Post LNA 4-way combiner Polarization Dual Linear requirements (-1 db points) 50-86 MHz, 230-470 MHz Out of band rejection >35dB Feed Cross Polarization > 20dB, 1-1024 MHz Receiver Channel Isolation > 50dB, 1-1024 MHz Receiver Located Apex Physical size 9 x 13 x 4.5 Weather tight enclosure Modified legacy P-band enclosure Power requirements 17.5 +/-2Vdc - < 2 Amps (Isolated) Total Power Gain Stability < 2% Change in output power/10c/30 minutes Noise Diode Thermal stability < 0.5% change in output power /30 minutes, Oven controlled Noise Diode Temperature Analog output proportional to temperature in C Monitor points (Vertex Room) Power supply voltage and current Operating temperature -20 to 50 C Power-up to Operational < 30 minutes ESD protection installed on power and signal lines P-Band Noise source injection Matched cables from source to LNA input Output level -44 dbm +/-1 db (4-Band and P-Band combined) Circuit board RF connectors Receiver enclosure connectors Dual receiver operation Low band (4&P) and either X or Ku F320/F14 Interface Specification Noise diode temperature Analog voltage proportional to temperature Noise diode temperature in alarm Alarm threshold and flag in MIB 17.5-voltage Analog voltage proportional to Voltage 17.5-current Analog voltage proportional to Current 20 Hz signal on/off Optical -10 dbm Optical digital signal 20 Hz signal on/off Copper Switched 28Vdc, jumper selectable F318 Monitoring power supply voltages F318 Monitoring internal temperatures 4

The present output is the sum of the 4-band and P-Band signals. Figure 4 shows a cartoon of the receiver output frequency response with an overlay of the frequency response of the legacy dipoles. The stop band rejection is designed to be more than 30 db. Figure 5 shows a laboratory measurement of the receiver output with a -65 dbm broadband noise source input. The passband shapes of the 4-band and P-band RF filters are clearly shown. Figure 6 shows the output waveform of the receiver in the array with a legacy 4-band and P-band dipole attached. RFI signal are present in the P-band bandpass. One of the design criteria for the LBR was to make the 74MHz output power to be about the same as the P-band power. However, in practice, when the 74 MHz dipoles were deployed, this added about 10-12 db of power to 74 MHz over the P-band power (more than expected). This causes the T304/T305 down Converters to apply attenuation before the samplers, reducing P-band power by an unwanted 10-12 db. The ALC was being driven by the 74 MHz power. The receivers were modified and the 74 MHz gains were lowered by 10-12 db to equalize the 74 MHz and P-band powers with dipoles connected. A summary of the modeled performance at 125 and 175 MHz bandwidths are given in table 2. Table 2, Summary of Modeled System Performance Component 125 MHz (Ambient temp =20C) T T (K) (K) 175 MHz (Ambient temp =20C) T T (K) (K) Dipole 300 6.988 300 6.988 Connector 300 1.252 300 1.482 Coax 300 16.390 300 16.402 Connector 300 1.324 300 1.568 Feed Thru 300 1.329 300 1.576 Coax 300 15.424 300 15.459 Coupler IL 300 21.982 300 22.032 Coupler 300 3.000 300 3.000 Branch (K) LNA noise (K) 300 60.7 300 60.7 Coax 300 0.0269 300 0.0269 Attenuator 300 1.78420 300 1.17716 Post Amp Noise (K) 300 2.964 300 2.360 Comments This table indicates the estimated temperature for each stage of the receiver component chain and its resulting T contribution to the receiver temperature T-receiver (K) 132 133 5

Figure 4 Summed output of 4-Band and P-Band Figure 5 Test bench: Original 4- and P-band noise powers in the lab, 74 MHz set to same total power as P-band. Noise source input -65 dbm. Figure 6 On Antenna: 4/P-band noise powers, 74 MHz -68 dbm; P-band -70 dbm With dipoles, showing noise power now equalized on both bands. 6

The measured receiver performance Figure 6 is a P-band image of some of Frazer Owns' recent DDT data on an anonymous target, using 23 antennas, 32 MHz (centered on 354 MHz) and 3.5 hours of data. Flagging eliminated about 20 percent of this data. The central noise level is 0.75 mjy/beam, while the outskirts have 0.63 mjy/beam (uncorrected for primary beam). This reduction was done using Huib Intema s GMRT data reduction tools with minimal changes. The black circles mark 1.5 and 3 degree radii. Vertical large tick marks are 1 degree apart. There are about 550 sources detected with >6 sigma peaks when blindly running PyBDSM on the whole area. The exposure calculator quotes 0.47 mjy/beam for the parameters above. This number is dominated by confusion noise (0.44 mjy/beam). Note that this observation is at sufficient negative DEC to elongate the synthesized beam, which will increase the confusion limit. If we believe the exposure calculator, it seems we're not too far off theoretical noise, definitely within a factor of 1.5 Figure 6 DDT data on an anonymous target, 7