Arc Flash Hazard and Mitigation 2 nd Workshop on Power Converters for Particle Accelerators June 14 16, 2010

Similar documents
Electrical Arc Hazards

AN EXAMPLE OF A STANDARD ARC FLASH PPE LABELING STRATEGY

AN EXAMPLE OF A STANDARD ARC FLASH PPE LABELING STRATEGY

NFPA-70E. Electrical Safety in the Workplace. Standard for Edition

{40C54206-A3BA D8-8D8CF }

STANDARDIZING ARC FLASH PPE LABELS

First Draft Language

Steve Kovach District Sales Engineer

ARC FLASH PPE GUIDELINES FOR INDUSTRIAL POWER SYSTEMS

Arc Flash Mitigation An Overview. Gus Nasrallah, P.E. Electroswitch May 30, 2013

NOTICE ER Roland Flood Pumping Station Arc Flash Study

Arc Flash Analysis and Documentation SOP

Arc Flash Calculation Methods

Arc Flash and NFPA 70E

Key factors to maintaining arc flash safety

SECTION SHORT CIRCUIT, COMPONENT PROTECTION, FLASH HAZARD AND SELECTIVE COORDINATION STUDY

Paul Dobrowsky Innovative Technology Services

DC ARC FLASH. THE IMPLICATIONS OF NFPA 70E 2012 ON BATTERY MAINTENANCE

THREE PHASE PAD MOUNTED DISTRIBUTION TRANSFORMER ARC FLASH TESTING JUNE 23, 2009 FERRAZ SHAWMUT HIGH POWER LABORATORY NEWBURYPORT, MA

Arc Flash Hazard Standards:

Cause, Effect & Mitigation Strategies

2015 NFPA 70E. SESHA 2015 ARIZONA MINI CONFERENCE December 10, 2015 Intel Corporation

Webinar: An Effective Arc Flash Safety Program

ARC FLASH & PPE UPDATE. Michael Olivo, P.E. Aaron Ramirez, E.I.T.

Arc Hazard Assessment for DC Applications in the Transit Industry

Electrical Measurement Safety. Sponsored By:

APPLYING LOW-VOLTAGE CIRCUIT BREAKERS TO LIMIT ARC FLASH ENERGY

Electrical Safety Policy Health and Safety FCX-HS03 Release 07/2018 Version 1

Ft Worth IEEE-PES. Presented by: Doug Harris Specifications Engineer Dallas, TX. Arc-Flash Hazard Mitigation & Selectivity

This section applies to the requirements for the performance of power system studies by both the Design Engineer and the Contractor.

DESIGN STANDARD DS 29

COMMON SOURCES OF ARC FLASH HAZARD IN INDUSTRIAL POWER SYSTEMS

A Guide to Establish an Arc Flash Safety Program for Electric Utilities

SECTION OVERCURRENT PROTECTIVE DEVICE COORDINATION STUDY

3Ø Short-Circuit Calculations

Short Circuit Current Calculations

ARC FLASH HAZARD ANALYSIS AND MITIGATION

NATIONAL ELECTRIC SAFETY CODE 2012 EDITION

Electrical Protection System Design and Operation

SECTION POWER SYSTEMS STUDIES

CHANGEABILITY OF ARC FLASH PARAMETERS AND ITS IMPACT ON HAZARD MITIGATION IN LOW VOLTAGE POWER SYSTEMS

POWER SYSTEM ANALYSIS TADP 641 SETTING OF OVERCURRENT RELAYS

2018 Consultant s Handbook Division 26 Electrical ARC Flash Hazard Analysis

A controlled arc-flash, produced in a flashtube. Even though the energy level used is fairly low (85 joules), the low-impedance, low-inductance

Arc Flash Study Principles & Procedures for below 15 kv AC Systems. Xuan Wu, Dennis Hoffman, Ronald Wellman, and Manish Thakur

Overcurrent and Overload Protection of AC Machines and Power Transformers

REDUCING ARC FLASH HAZARD BY REMOTE SWITCHING

high RESISTANCE GROUNDING SYSTEM the power to protect www. ElectricalPartManuals. com Instruction Manual C-102

Effective System Grounding

ADDENDUM NO. 2 PROJECT: COURTLAND PUMP STATION CONTRACT: IFB NO COM.00030

MV ELECTRICAL TRANSMISSION DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION STANDARD. PART 1: GENERAL 1.01 Transformer

Education & Training

Low voltage circuit breakers

How OSHA s New Transient Overvoltage Requirements Affect Work Practices. B.A. YEUNG, H. BRANCO Leidos Engineering, LLC USA

Selection of PPE Practical experience of different arc assessment methods and their comparison

High Frequency SineWave Guardian TM Filter

Unit 3 Magnetism...21 Introduction The Natural Magnet Magnetic Polarities Magnetic Compass...21

Preface...x Chapter 1 Electrical Fundamentals

MV network design & devices selection EXERCISE BOOK

Power System Study for the Pebble #2 Lift Station Las Vegas, Nevada

PREFACE ********************************************************** IT IS NOT INTENDED THAT THESE STANDARDS BE COPIED AND USED AS A SPECIFICATION!

Arc Flash Analysis Training

7P Series - Surge Protection Device (SPD) Features 7P P P

Overview of Grounding for Industrial and Commercial Power Systems Presented By Robert Schuerger, P.E.

ECE 528 Understanding Power Quality

The advantages of transformers. EMC-ESD in de praktijk Jan-Kees van der Ven

Protection Basics Presented by John S. Levine, P.E. Levine Lectronics and Lectric, Inc GE Consumer & Industrial Multilin

15B+/17B+/18B+ Calibration Manual. Digital Multimeter

2 Grounding of power supply system neutral

Electrical Overcurrent Studies

High Frequency Sinewave Guardian TM Filter

RMEL Safety Conference

thepower to protect the power to protect i-gard LITERATURE Low and medium voltage

Transformer Protection

Standards for MV switchgear rated for arc flash protection

ELECTRICIAN S THEORY EXAMINATION 15 November 2014 QUESTION AND ANSWER BOOKLET

1960 Research Drive, Suite 100, Troy, Michigan with. REVISION: December 10, 2007 (Supersedes previous versions) Prepared by:

UBC Technical Guidelines Section Edition Medium-Voltage Transformers Page 1 of 5

1% Switchgear and Substations

Selective Coordination for Emergency and Legally-Required Standby Power Distribution Systems

AMENDMENT NO. 1 SEPTEMBER IS (Part 1) : 2001/IEC (1991) SURGE ARRESTORS

374/375/376 Clamp Meter. Users Manual

ECE 528 Understanding Power Quality. Paul Ortmann (voice) Lecture 6

Best Practice Reducing The Risk of Arc Flash Cross Over

CHOICE OF MV FEEDER BIL TO MAXIMIZE QOS AND MINIMIZE EQUIPMENT FAILURE

Reducing the Effects of Short Circuit Faults on Sensitive Loads in Distribution Systems

EXPERIMENT 1 Safety, Instrumentation, and Measurement

Environmental Health and Safety Office Hazardous Dust Control Guide

Short-Circuit Current Calculations

Voltage Sag Mitigation by Neutral Grounding Resistance Application in Distribution System of Provincial Electricity Authority

technical information

netzerotools.com 374/375/376 Users Manual Clamp Meter

Relion 605 series. Self-Powered Feeder Protection REJ603 Application manual

Addendum to Instructions for Installation, Operation and Maintenance of Digitrip 3000 Protective Relays

MITIGATING ELECTRIC SHOCK AND ARC FLASH ENERGY A TOTAL SYSTEM APPROACH FOR PERSONNEL AND EQUIPMENT PROTECTION

Improving Transformer Protection

Electrical testing safety Part 1: Preparing for absence of voltage testing

NOsparc! MHXAC1F120! MHXAC1F240! MHXAC1F480 PATENTS AND PATENTS PENDING. Contact Arc Suppressor

Design Approaches for Hospital Distribution Systems With Considerations for Future Expansion, Operator Safety, and Cost

The Importance of the Neutral-Grounding Resistor. Presented by: Jeff Glenney, P.Eng. and Don Selkirk, E.I.T.

Transcription:

Arc Flash Hazard and Mitigation 2 nd Workshop on Power Converters for Particle Accelerators June 14 16, 2010 Paul Bellomo June 14-16, 2010 2nd Workshop on Power Converters for Particle Accelerators - Arc Flash and Mitigation 1

Motivations and Topics Electrical arc flash accident at SLAC October 2004 Possible unfamiliarity by others outside of U.S.A. Define an arc flash and how it can be encountered Define potential hazards and injuries associated with an arc flash Calculate the potential hazard for arc flash Mitigating the potential hazards associated with arc flash June 14-16, 2010 2nd Workshop on Power Converters for Particle Accelerators - Arc Flash and Mitigation 2

THE ELECTRICAL HAZARDS There are 3 types of electrical hazards 1. Shock, with which most of us are familiar 2. Arc Flash, which will be covered at more length in subsequent slides 3. Arc Blast, which is the explosive energy from the pressure wave produced during an arc flash incident June 14-16, 2010 2nd Workshop on Power Converters for Particle Accelerators - Arc Flash and Mitigation 3

USA A Word on Safety Standards National Electrical Code NFPA 70-2008 Deals with hardware design, inspection and installation Most Articles not applicable to power systems, but some examples that do are grounding and discharge of stored energy in capacitors V i = 500V V f = 50V t=60 sec C= 500mF R R V f Vi R e t RC t 60 * sec C ln ( V / V ) 500 m F ln( 50V / 500V ) f i R 50 kohm 2 2 V ( 500V ) P i R 5W R 50 k U se two 5W, 100k resistors in parallel June 14-16, 2010 2nd Workshop on Power Converters for Particle Accelerators - Arc Flash and Mitigation 4

Some Standards - Continued Standard for Electrical Safety in the Workplace Addresses employer and employee safety in the workplace Focus is on procedures, personnel protective equipment Attempts to mitigate effects of three major electrical hazard types shock, arc flash and arc blast IEEE 1584 2002, Guide for Performing Arc Flash Hazard Calculations June 14-16, 2010 2nd Workshop on Power Converters for Particle Accelerators - Arc Flash and Mitigation 5

What is an Arc Flash and Arc Blast? The insulation and isolation of energized parts fail The short circuit vaporizes copper, producing a hot plasma gas in air exceeding a temperature of 35000 o F The explosive fireball expands at subsonic speeds. It injures faster than the worker can sense that anything unusual has happened. It is primarily a burn and an explosive hazard, not an electrocution hazard It can be initiated and occur in many ways causing severe burns, blindness, deafness, dismemberment and death They occur 5 to 10 times a day in electric equipment in the USA alone June 14-16, 2010 2nd Workshop on Power Converters for Particle Accelerators - Arc Flash and Mitigation 6

Possible Causes of Arc Flash and Arc Blast Tool inserted or dropped into a breaker or service area Equipment cover removal causes a short Loose connections on bus work Improper bus work fabrication Insulation breakdown due to environmental factors or equipment aging Failure to ensure equipment is deenergized before work Primarily instances occur above 208VAC June 14-16, 2010 2nd Workshop on Power Converters for Particle Accelerators - Arc Flash and Mitigation 7

Injuries Associated with Arc Flash Third Degree Burns Blindness Hearing Loss Nerve Damage Cardiac Arrest Concussion Death June 14-16, 2010 2nd Workshop on Power Converters for Particle Accelerators - Arc Flash and Mitigation 8

Arc flash protection boundary is the distance from the arc at which a person could receive a second degree (curable) burn on the torso or face. It is the boundary at which the arc energy density =1.2 cal/cm 2 = 5 J/cm 2. This is comparable to holding the flame from a cigarette lighter on the skin for 1 second June 14-16, 2010 2nd Workshop on Power Converters for Particle Accelerators - Arc Flash and Mitigation 9

Reasons for Arc Flash Hazard Large amount of power available at equipment (example: large utilization equipment such as a dipole supply Very often more economical to build one large substation than several small ones Importance of arc-flash hazard not recognized. The first major paper not written until 1982 Heretofore protection coordinated based on minimizing equipment damage from overheating or fire, not personnel. So thermal time constants properly set Minimize nuisance trips due to line transients, inrush current, etc so fast time constants improperly set. These could minimize the arc flash hazard to personnel June 14-16, 2010 2nd Workshop on Power Converters for Particle Accelerators - Arc Flash and Mitigation 10

Arc Flash Hazard An arc generates power that radiates out from a fault P V * I arc arc arc The total energy is the product of the arc power and duration of the arc E P * t arc arc The energy density decreases with distance from the arc Flash protection boundaries and energies are calculated using NFPA 70E [example Table 130.7(C)(9)(a)] and IEEE1584 The calculations entail knowing the voltage class of the equipment, some details about its manufacture, the available short circuit current and the opening times of the protective circuit breaker(s) June 14-16, 2010 2nd Workshop on Power Converters for Particle Accelerators - Arc Flash and Mitigation 11

Early Model In 1982, the first calculations concerning arc-flash were published by Ralph Lee Calculated the maximum available power from an arc Assumed the power density dropped off as the inverse square of the distance from the arc Related the energy to biological studies that determined the seconddegree burn threshold Formula for working distance to avoid second-degree burns reproduced in 130.3(A) of NFPA 70E D 2.65 M VA t D c c M VA bf bf flash protection boundary in feet bolted fault pow er t = clearing tim e in seconds June 14-16, 2010 2nd Workshop on Power Converters for Particle Accelerators - Arc Flash and Mitigation 12

First Empirical Models Mid 1990s, other teams from DuPont, Doughty, et. al., and IEEE Working Group 1584, performed a set of experiments to measure the heat, pressure and sound generated by an arc Wanted empirical data to quantify arc flash hazards Measured dependence on arcing current Measured voltage dependence Measured dependence on distance from arc Detailed configuration and enclosure dependencies. Found that enclosures focus the energy and pressure blast from the arc Flash protection boundary more conservative than Lee's Formulae reproduced in 1584 and Annex D.6 of NFPA 70E Developed an algorithm to conservatively estimate the arc-flash hazard June 14-16, 2010 2nd Workshop on Power Converters for Particle Accelerators - Arc Flash and Mitigation 13

IEEE 1584 The Algorithm Acquire system data Calculate bolted fault current from standard engineering formula Calculate 100% arcing and 85% arcing currents from IEEE 1584 formula Use appropriate time-current curve of clearing device to determine clearing times Calculate arc-flash energy at the appropriate working distance using the worst case from the 100% arcing or 85% arcing currents June 14-16, 2010 2nd Workshop on Power Converters for Particle Accelerators - Arc Flash and Mitigation 14

NFPA 70E and IEEE 1584 208VAC Exemption Arc needs to sustain itself in order to generate enough heat to cause burns Empirical evidence from studies showed that it was extremely difficult to sustain an arc from a 208VAC system Statement from IEEE 1584 The arc-flash hazard need only be considered for large 208 V systems; systems fed by transformers smaller than 125 kva should not be a concern. June 14-16, 2010 2nd Workshop on Power Converters for Particle Accelerators - Arc Flash and Mitigation 15

Calculation Assumptions Nothing in the panel being operated, including the main breaker, will protect us in case of an arc-flash during the operation of any part of that panel Main breaker could fail on line side during operation Arc-flash originating at operated breaker could spread to line side of main breaker The fronts of the panel-boards and switchboards provide no protection against arc-flash Independent of the clearing time of the upstream protective device, the worker will move away from exposure in less than 2 seconds, so that two seconds is a reasonable maximum time for calculations June 14-16, 2010 2nd Workshop on Power Converters for Particle Accelerators - Arc Flash and Mitigation 16

Bolted Fault Current Calculation Power from a three-phase Wye or Delta transformer is S 3 * V * I 3 P LL L The full load line current is I FL M VA * 10 3*V LL 6 Available short circuit current using the transformer rating and circuit impedances (mainly leakage inductance of transformer) I I BF BF M VA * 10 * 100 3 * V * Z (% ) LL M VA * 10 * 1 3 * V * Z ( pu ) LL 6 6 June 14-16, 2010 2nd Workshop on Power Converters for Particle Accelerators - Arc Flash and Mitigation 17

IEEE 1584 Calculation - Arcing Current Empirical formula from IEEE 1584 Bolted fault current (I bf in ka) Must calculate arcing current (I a in ka) at which the flash energy is generated K 0.662 log I 0.0966V 0.000526 G 0.5588V log I 0.0 0304 G log I I a lower than I bf therefore may last a longer time than I bf since it may take longer for the protective device to clear K is the value for the arc ambient (0.153 for open air, 0.097 for boxes) V is the system voltage in kv bf bf bf I 10 a G is the conductor gap in mm (25mm for 480VAC MCCs and panels) Use 100% I a and 85% I a for clearing times from breaker or fuse timecurrent curves June 14-16, 2010 2nd Workshop on Power Converters for Particle Accelerators - Arc Flash and Mitigation 18

Clearing Times Once the arcing currents are determined, the clearing times must be determined We must identify the upstream fuse or breaker that will clear the fault The manufacturer's time-current curves for the appropriate device are identified The arcing current is found on the x axis and the clearing time is read from the y axis June 14-16, 2010 2nd Workshop on Power Converters for Particle Accelerators - Arc Flash and Mitigation 19

Protective Devices Protective devices act to clear fault currents Fuses (fixed time-current curves) Molded Case Circuit Breakers (MCCB) Thermal Magnetic (adjustable) Electronic (adjustable) Low Voltage Power Circuit Breakers (adjustable) Vacuum Contactors with Protective Relays (adjustable) June 14-16, 2010 2nd Workshop on Power Converters for Particle Accelerators - Arc Flash and Mitigation 20

Molded Case Circuit Breakers Panel-board with 4-800A MCCBs Thermal-magnetic Adjustable with front panel rotary switches June 14-16, 2010 2nd Workshop on Power Converters for Particle Accelerators - Arc Flash and Mitigation 21

Molded Case Circuit Breakers Motor Control Center (MCC) main breaker (2000A) Separate Frame and Trip units Adjustable with front panel rotary switches Electronic Trip Control LSIG Long Time Short Time Instantaneous Ground Current June 14-16, 2010 2nd Workshop on Power Converters for Particle Accelerators - Arc Flash and Mitigation 22

Low Voltage Power Circuit Breaker First breaker downstream of transformer Separate frame and trip unit Rated up to 4000A Trip units are adjustable via front panel controls Typically inside a substation June 14-16, 2010 2nd Workshop on Power Converters for Particle Accelerators - Arc Flash and Mitigation 23

Medium Voltage Breaker and Protective Relay Protects primary side (12.47kV) of transformer Breaker has tripping mechanism but no sensor Protective relay Connected to current transformers on bus Activate breaker tripping mechanism Adjustable via DIP switches June 14-16, 2010 2nd Workshop on Power Converters for Particle Accelerators - Arc Flash and Mitigation 24

Time-Current Curves Each protective device has a time-current curve Current on x-axis Time on y-axis Currents below the trip value will not open the device Currents slightly above the trip value will trip after a long time to prevent fires from heating in the wires Currents very much larger than the trip setting signal a fault and trip the device as quickly as possible Adjustments set these values and, if applicable, the intermediate behavior of the breaker June 14-16, 2010 2nd Workshop on Power Converters for Particle Accelerators - Arc Flash and Mitigation 25

Typical Medium Voltage Fuse Time-Current Curve (Ferraz-Shawmut) Non-adjustable Top of y-axis is 1000 seconds and fuses not yet open on 2X overcurrents These fuses take more than 0.1 second to open on 10X overcurrent Different classes of fuses for different voltages and currents June 14-16, 2010 2nd Workshop on Power Converters for Particle Accelerators - Arc Flash and Mitigation 26

Typical Breaker Time-Current Curve (Cutler Hammer) Thermal breaker (90A) Small over-current takes > 30 minutes to trip 30ms 16ms Min Max Lines of constant I 2 t (constant energy) protect against thermal damage 17X (1530A) over-current trips in 30 msec Very high currents trip in 16 msec Note that curve gives min, max tolerance band 1530A 7000A June 14-16, 2010 2nd Workshop on Power Converters for Particle Accelerators - Arc Flash and Mitigation 27

Adjustable MCCB (LSIG) Time-Current Curve(C-H) Adjustable breaker can set various parameters Long time moves left hand side vertical bar Short time pickup sets intermediate vertical bar Short time delay sets intermediate pedestal Instantaneous setting determines current at which instantaneous trip occurs June 14-16, 2010 2nd Workshop on Power Converters for Particle Accelerators - Arc Flash and Mitigation 28

Normalized Incident Energies Once the system configuration and arcing currents are known, the normalized, and 85% normalized, arcing energies are calculated E 10 n K K 1.081 Log I 0.0011 G 1 2 a E 10 85 n K K 1.081 Log I 0.0011 G 1 2 85 a K 1 =-0.555 for enclosed arcs, K 2 =-0.113 for a grounded system I a = 100% arcing current in ka, I 85a = 85% arcing current in ka G is the conductor gap in mm (25mm for 480VAC MCCs and panels) E n, E 85n, are expressed in cal/cm 2 June 14-16, 2010 2nd Workshop on Power Converters for Particle Accelerators - Arc Flash and Mitigation 29

Actual Incident Energies Then the 100% actual and 85% actual arcing energies are calculated t 610 x a a f n( )( ) E C E 0.2 D t 610 x 85 a 85 a f 85 n( )( ) E C E E a, E 85a are expressed in cal/cm2 0.2 D C f = 1.5 (voltages below 1 kv and = 1.0 for voltages above 1 kv) t a and t 85a are 100% and 85% arcing time in seconds, obtained from the appropriate time-current curve 0.2 is an empirical time expressed in seconds 610 is 24 inches expressed in mm D is working distance in mm x (1.641 in most 480VAC systems) is a system-dependent, dimensionless, distance factor from Table 4 of IEEE 1584 or Table D.7.2 of NFPA 70E June 14-16, 2010 2nd Workshop on Power Converters for Particle Accelerators - Arc Flash and Mitigation 30

Working Distance The safe working distance is defined as the minimum distance at which the worker's body and torso receives a second degree burn (E a or E 85a =1.2 cal/cm 2 ) Invert the previous formulas to obtain the Flash Protection Boundary distances (E a or E 85a =1.2 cal/cm 2 ) D C f E 1/ x n ta ( ) ( ) ( 610) 1.2 0.2 D 85 C f E t 1/ x 85n 85a ( ) ( ) ( 610) 1.2 0.2 Take the larger of the arcing energies and distances for use on the arc flash hazard labels June 14-16, 2010 2nd Workshop on Power Converters for Particle Accelerators - Arc Flash and Mitigation 31

Hazard/Risk Category The hazard/risk category is determined by selecting the row for which E min < E a < E max (cal/cm 2 ) at the working distance E min E max Hazard/Risk Category 0 1.2 0 1.2 4 1 4 8 2 8 25 3 25 40 4 The appropriate Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) required is then determined from Table 130.7(C)(10) and Table 130.7(C)(11) of NFPA 70E June 14-16, 2010 2nd Workshop on Power Converters for Particle Accelerators - Arc Flash and Mitigation 32

B620 Calculation B620 MCC-02 347 1000 kva 12.47 kv/480 V %Z = 5.57% C-H Digitrip RMS 310 RES2000LSIG Cat A20RES20T1 In=C=1600 stpu=2in; sdt=i Curve SC 5630-93 Calculate two arc-flash energies 1. Operate 150A feeder breaker in MCC 2. Operate breaker downstream of clean power transformer Clean power transformer C-H 150A Thermal breaker Curve SC-4149-87B 112.5 kva 480 V/480 V %Z = 5.60% Main transformer 1MVA 12.47KV/480V, Z = 5.57% Clean power transformer 112.5 kva 480V/480V, Z = 5.60% June 14-16, 2010 2nd Workshop on Power Converters for Particle Accelerators - Arc Flash and Mitigation 33

June 14-16, 2010 MCC Feeder Breaker Calculation I fl = 1.2 ka Z = 5.57% Fault currents I bf = 21.6 ka I a = 12.7 ka 0.85I a = 10.8 ka Clearing times from C-H AD 29-167R Curve SC-5630-93 t bf = 0.040 s t a = 0.051 s t 0.85a = 0.051 s Times are short because breaker is set at its fastest setting 2nd Workshop on Power Converters for Particle Accelerators - Arc Flash and Mitigation 34

MCC Feeder Breaker Calculation Working distance is 30 (because breaker is recessed from handle) E a = 0.94 cal/cm 2 E 0.85a = 0.79 cal/cm 2 Maximum energy (0.94 cal/cm 2 ) less than 1.2 cal/cm 2 so operation of this circuit breaker is Hazard/Risk Category 0 Table 130.7(C)(9)(a) not applicable because I bf < 65 ka t clear > 0.030 seconds June 14-16, 2010 2nd Workshop on Power Converters for Particle Accelerators - Arc Flash and Mitigation 35

Clean Power Breaker Calculation I fl = 135 A Z = 6.23% Fault currents I bf = 2.2 ka I a = 1.8 ka 0.85I a = 1.5 ka Clearing times from C-H AD 29-167F Curve SC-4438-88A t bf = 0.017 s t a = 0.024 s t 0.85a = 1.6 s Time is large because system is not properly coordinated June 14-16, 2010 2nd Workshop on Power Converters for Particle Accelerators - Arc Flash and Mitigation 36

Clean Power Breaker Calculation Working distance is 18 (NFPA70E standard) E a = 0.12 cal/cm 2 E 0.85a = 6.9 cal/cm 2 Maximum energy (6.9 cal/cm 2 ) between 4 and 8 cal/cm 2 so operation of this circuit breaker is Hazard/Risk Category 2 Table 130.7(C)(9)(a) not applicable I bf < 25 ka t clear > 0.030 seconds 112.5 kva transformer in circuit led to long clearing times of upstream breaker Reduce arc-flash by Using faster clearing time upstream breaker Adding separate downstream breaker or fuse June 14-16, 2010 2nd Workshop on Power Converters for Particle Accelerators - Arc Flash and Mitigation 37

Mitigating the Arc Flash Hazard Decrease available energy by using smaller upstream transformer (208V transformers less than 125 kva pose no arc-flash hazard) Decrease clearing time Size breaker trip units more aggressively Choose breakers for instantaneous trip times (smaller frame sizes generally trip faster than larger frame sizes) Choose breakers with adjustable trip units including adjustments for instantaneous trips Protective devices upstream of transformers need to allow inrush current when transformer is energized. Using only upstream sensors, it is difficult to be as aggressive as desirable for arc-flash protection downstream of transformer. Add over-current devices on transformer secondary June 14-16, 2010 2nd Workshop on Power Converters for Particle Accelerators - Arc Flash and Mitigation 38

Mitigating the Arc Flash Hazard Insert fast acting breakers or fuses in separate enclosures between the transformer and the equipment that needs to be operated. In general, separate the enclosures that contain arc-flash generated in that enclosure Increase distance between worker and source of arc-flash Use remote controls to operate high arc-flash hazard devices Use extension handles on breakers to increase working distance of operation Install meters or lights on equipment fronts to verify the system is deenergized before work is started Install IR view-ports on panels that need to be monitored for overtemperature Install protective devices that sense arcs and not just over-current June 14-16, 2010 2nd Workshop on Power Converters for Particle Accelerators - Arc Flash and Mitigation 39

Mitigating the Arc Flash Hazard Hazard Risk Category 0 1 2 2* Typical Protective Clothing and Minimum Ratings Abridged NFPA 70E Table 130.7(C)(10)and (11) Clothing Description NM long sleeve shirt, NM long pants, safety glasses, hearing protection, leather gloves (as needed) FR long sleeve shirt, FR pants or FR coverall, safety glasses, face shield or flash hood, hard hat, hearing protection, leather gloves, leather work shoes (as needed) FR long sleeve shirt, FR pants or FR coverall, safety glasses, face shield or flash hood, hard hat, hearing protection, leather gloves, leather work shoes (as needed) FR long sleeve shirt, FR pants or FR coverall, safety glasses, face shield and Balaclava, or flash hood, hard hat, hearing protection, leather gloves, leather work shoes (as needed) Required Minimum Arc Rating of PPE [J/cm2 (cal/cm2)] NA 16.74 (4) 33.47 (8) 33.47 (8) 3 Refer to the NFPA Table 104.6 (25) 4 Refer to the NFPA Table 167.4 (40) June 14-16, 2010 2nd Workshop on Power Converters for Particle Accelerators - Arc Flash and Mitigation 40

Mitigating the Arc Flash Hazard - Ground Hooks The possibility of residual stored energy in capacitors is high. Use bleeder resistors and one or more ground stick to remove the stored energy June 14-16, 2010 2nd Workshop on Power Converters for Particle Accelerators - Arc Flash and Mitigation 41

The Arc Flash Hazard from Capacitors Arc flash protection boundary determination from energy stored in capacitors D eveloped by Jim S ebek of S LA C and based on R. H. Lee in N FPA70E Dc 2.65 M Vsource Abf t w here Dc is the arc flash boundary in feet 1 2 R ecall that E stored C V is the stored capacitor energy in joules 2 A ccording to Lee the m axim um energy dissipated in a fault occurs w hen 2 2 the fault voltage is of the supply voltage and the arc current is 2 2 1 of the available fault current (the arc is resistive). T herefore, Pm ax M V sou rce Abf 2 or, to keep D c inviolate, 2 Pm ax M V sou rce Abf substituting yields 6 Dc 5.3 M Vsource Abf t 5.3 P m ax ( M W ) t 5.3 * 10 P m ax ( W ) t R ecognizing that w atts*tim e = energy in joules yields 6 Dc 5.3 * 10 E stored June 14-16, 2010 2nd Workshop on Power Converters for Particle Accelerators - Arc Flash and Mitigation 42

Hazard Labels The WARNING label is for operating enclosed circuit breakers. No shock hazard listed. Note the requirement for identification of the equipment to which it will be affixed The DANGER label is for exposed, energized work. Shock and arc flash hazards listed. Arc flash hazard category typically higher than for the Warning Label. Note the requirement for identification of the equipment to which it will be affixed June 14-16, 2010 2nd Workshop on Power Converters for Particle Accelerators - Arc Flash and Mitigation 43

Conclusion More information http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/servlet/opac?punumber=8088 NFPA 70E 2009 Edition http://www.mt-online.com/articles/0204arcflash.cfm http://www.eaton.com/ecm/idcplg?idcservice=get_file&did=12075 http://www.eaton.com/ecm/idcplg?idcservice=get_file&did=118182 http://ecatalog.squared.com/pubs/circuit%20protection/0100db0402.pdf June 14-16, 2010 2nd Workshop on Power Converters for Particle Accelerators - Arc Flash and Mitigation 44