D. Bergemann and J. Välimäki (2002), Information and Efficient Mechanism Design, Econometrica, 70,

Similar documents
Publications of R.W. Rosenthal

1 sur :34

Game Theory. Lecture Notes By Y. Narahari. Department of Computer Science and Automation Indian Institute of Science Bangalore, India July 2012

Introduction to Game Theory Preliminary Reading List Jörgen W. Weibull Stockholm School of Economics and Ecole Polytechnique.

DAVID M. KREPS. Ph.D. in Operations Research and M.A. in Economics from Stanford University, 1975.

Introduction to Game Theory Reading List Jörgen W. Weibull Stockholm School of Economics and Ecole Polytechnique. April 7, 2010

Environmental Economics EAE- 395A

CHAPTER LEARNING OUTCOMES. By the end of this section, students will be able to:

Instructor. Description. Grading. Preliminary List of Readings. Annie Liang Office: 462 McNeil Building

Multi-Agent Bilateral Bargaining and the Nash Bargaining Solution

Information Economics

Chapter 1 (except Afterword and Exercises). Auction Theory: A Guide to the Literature. Journal of Economic Surveys 1999, 13(3),

Kauffman Dissertation Executive Summary

Algorithmic Game Theory and Applications. Kousha Etessami

Game Theory. Martin Dufwenberg August 7, 2010 For Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science

Chapter 13. Game Theory

Introduction: What is Game Theory?

Centre for Studies in Science Policy School of Social Sciences

BRIEF RESUME. Norman C. Miller, Professor of Economics. Ph.D. University of Pittsburgh, 1966 supported by a National Science Foundation Fellowship;

Field Markets and Institutions

PACKAGE LICENSES IN PATENT POOLS *

Tanga McDaniel Mohr. September Department of Economics Phone: (1) (828) Appalachian State University Fax: (1) (828) 262.

Conference Presentation

Unionization, Innovation, and Licensing. Abstract

Curriculum Vita. Leonid Kogan

Advanced Macroeconomics Course: Social learning and Intelligent Design Ramon Marimon

20 Bounded Rationality and Related Concepts Fundamental to Intellectual Property Analysis

Finite games: finite number of players, finite number of possible actions, finite number of moves. Canusegametreetodepicttheextensiveform.

Computational Methods for Non-Cooperative Game Theory

Robert Aumann s Game and Economic Theory

Appendix A A Primer in Game Theory

A note on k-price auctions with complete information when mixed strategies are allowed

On Patent Licensing in Spatial Competition

Distributed Optimization and Games

HONGBIN LI. Ph.D. Department of Economics, Stanford University, 2001 B.A. Department of Finance, China Agricultural University, 1993

System change in a regulatory state paradigm: the smart grid in the UK

Patent Protection, Innovation Rate and Welfare

Curriculum Vita. Leonid Kogan

Game Theory ( nd term) Dr. S. Farshad Fatemi. Graduate School of Management and Economics Sharif University of Technology.

Experimental Economics A EXPLORATIONS IN ECONOMIC HISTORY A FINANCE AND STOCHASTICS A FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT (el.

Curriculum Vitae William A. Branch

Ross M. Starr October 2015 CURRICULUM VITAE ROSS M. STARR

Curriculum Vitae November Karen K. Lewis

Computational Aspects of Game Theory Bertinoro Spring School Lecture 2: Examples

ANoteonthe Game - Bounded Rationality and Induction

Curriculum Vita. Leonid Kogan

Can t we all just get along? IPRs, standards, interoperability, governance and cooperation

New School for Social Research. Cultural Economics Ph.D. Field Reading List. Cameron M. Weber

RASMUSSEN: bibliography 2006/9/20 19:51 page 493 #1

Economics of Science and Innovation Part I: Theory and facts Ramon Marimon

INTRODUCTION TO GAME THEORY

Game Theoretic Problems in Network Economics and Mechanism Design Solutions

Macroeconomic Theory 2

Copyright 2008, Yan Chen

Auctions with Manipulative Players

Introduction to Game Theory

International Economics B 2. Basics in noncooperative game theory

Microeconomics of Banking: Lecture 4

CNV KRISHNAN VITA. Ph.D.,Graduate School of Business, University of Wisconsin-Madison. MBA, Indian Institute of Management-Ahmedabad, India

CSCI 699: Topics in Learning and Game Theory Fall 2017 Lecture 3: Intro to Game Theory. Instructor: Shaddin Dughmi

When the Threat is Stronger than the Execution: Trade Liberalization and Welfare under Oligopoly

PROPOSAL TEMPLATE. Patent Duration and Collusive Behaviour to Postpone R&D for Innovative Treatments

FISS 2010 Financial Institutions Summer School. University of Victoria, June 2010 READING LIST

The Strategy of Manipulating Conflict: Comment

Artificial Intelligence and Asymmetric Information Theory. Tshilidzi Marwala and Evan Hurwitz. University of Johannesburg.

Macroeconomics 1 (2015/2016)

SOCIAL GAMES: Matching and the Play of Finitely Repeated Games

arxiv: v1 [cs.gt] 12 Jun 2008

Dirk Bergemann. Department of Economics September 2018 Yale University phone (203) New Haven, CT fax (203)

Evolving games and the social contract

Dr Ioannis Bournakis

Citation for the original published paper (version of record):

An Application of Game Theory to Electronic Communications Markets *

Rational Secure Computation and Ideal Mechanism Design

ELEN E6767x or y: INTERNET ECONOMICS, ENGINEERING AND THE IMPLICATIONS FOR SOCIETY

COMPSCI 223: Computational Microeconomics - Practice Final

Game Theory. Department of Electronics EL-766 Spring Hasan Mahmood

An Introductory Course on Mathematical Game Theory

Game theory Computational Models of Cognition

State Trading Companies, Time Inconsistency, Imperfect Enforceability and Reputation

Multiple-Choice Knapsack Model

Patrick Bolton: CURRICULUM VITAE

CHARLES R. HULTEN. A.B. (Statistics) University of California, Berkeley, 1965 Ph.D. (Economics) University of California, Berkeley, 1973

Normal Form Games: A Brief Introduction

Lecture 10: Auction Mechanisms

FIN 501. Part 2 of a PhD course taught at. Bergen, Norway December 17-20, 2007

Relay Selection for Flexible Multihop Communication via Competitive Spectrum Leasing

To be presented at Fifth Annual Conference on Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Northwestern University, Friday, June 15, 2012

CME GROUP-MSRI FEB 2. PRIZE in INNOVATIVE QUANTITATIVE APPLICATIONS. MODERATED SEMINAR and AWARD LUNCHEON CHICAGO, ILLINOIS

Ann E. Sherman. Department of Finance, DePaul University Office Phone: +1 (312) E. Jackson Blvd., Suite 5532 Office Fax: +1 (312)

Curriculum Vitae University of California at Los Angeles, USA Visiting Professor

Ewa Drabik. Warsaw University of Technology, Warsaw, Poland

Curriculum Vitae April 2013

Modern Game Theory. By Nicola Giocoli. Cheltenham, UK, and. Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar, pp. $

Theory and Practice in Spectrum Value Estimation

Ramses H. ABUL NAGA University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen AB24 3QY

BS2243 Lecture 3 Strategy and game theory

GARY D. HANSEN 4/17/2018. Address:

Yi Wen Assistant Vice President

Harold Linh Cole. (revised 7/2017) Professor of Economics, University of California, Los Angeles

Transcription:

References for Recent Contributions to Mechanism Design E. Maskin 1. Auctions with Interdependent Values D. Bergemann and J. Välimäki (2002), Information and Efficient Mechanism Design, Econometrica, 70, 1007-1033. O. Birulin and S. Izmalkov (2002), Efficiency of the N-bidder English Auction, mimeo. K. Chung and J. Ely (2001) Efficient and Dominance Solvable Auctions with Interdependent Valuations, mimeo. J. Crémer and R. McLean (1985), Optimal Selling Strategies under Uncertainty for a Discriminating Monopolist when Demands are Interdependent, Econometrica, 115, 341-388. P. Dasgupta and E. Maskin (2000), Efficient Auctions, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115, 341-388. P. Eso and E. Maskin (2000), Efficient Auctions for Multiple Goods and Multidimensional Signals, mimeo. S. Izmalkov (2001), English Auctions with Reentry, mimeo. S. Izmalkov (2001), Multi-unit Open Ascending Price Efficient Auctions, P. Jehiel and B. Moldovanu (2001), Efficient Design with Interdependent Values, Econometrica, 69, 1237-1259. V. Krishna (2003), Asymmetric English Auctions, Journal of Economic Theory, 112, 261-288 E. Maskin (1992), Auctions and Privatization, in H. Siebert, ed., Privatization, Tübigen: J.C.B. Mohr. C. Mezzetti (2004), Mechanism Design with Interdependent Valuations: Efficiency, Econometrica, 72, 1617-1626. M. Perry and P. Reny (2002), An Efficient Auction, Econometrica, 70, 1199-1212. M. Perry and P. Reny (2005), An Efficient Multi-Unit Ascending Auction, Review of Economic Studies, 72, 567-592. W. Vickrey (1961), Counterspeculation and Competitive Sealed Tenders, Journal of Finance, 16, 8-37. 1

Recent surveys of auction design: P. Klemperer (2000), The Economic Theory of Auctions (2 volumes), Edward Elgar, Cheltenham P. Klemperer (2004), Auctions: Theory and Practice, Princeton University Press, Princeton and Oxford. E. Maskin (2004), The Unity of Auction Theory, Journal of Economic Literature, 42 (4), pp. 1102-1115. P. Milgrom (2004), Putting Auction Theory to Work, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. V. Krishna (2002), Auction Theory, Academic Press, San Diego. 2. Robust Implementation D. Bergemann and S. Morris (2003), Robust Implementation: The Role of Rich Type Spaces, mimeo. S. Bikhchandani (2004), The Limits of Ex Post Implementation Revisited, mimeo D. Bergemann and S. Morris (2004), Robust Mechanism Design, mimeo. D. Bergemann and S. Morris (2005), Ex Post Implementation, mimeo. O. Birulin (2003), Inefficient Ex Post Equilibria in Efficient Auctions, Economic Theory, 22, 675-683. K. Chung and J. Ely (2003), Implementation with Near-Complete Information, Econometrica, 71, 857-871. K. Chung and J. Ely (2003a), Ex-Post Incentive Compatible Mechanism Design, mimeo. L. Corchon and I. Oruño-Ortin (1995), Robust Implementation under Alternative Information Structures, Economic Design, 1, 159-171. J. Duggan and J. Roberts (1997), Robust Implementation, mimeo. K. Eliaz (2002), Fault Tolerant Implementation, Review of Economic Studies, 69, 589-610. 2

A. Heifetz and Z. Neeman (2004), On the Generic Infeasibility of Full Surplus Extraction in Mechanism Design, mimeo. P. Jehiel, M. Meyer-ter-Vehn, and B. Moldovanu (2004), The Limits of Ex Post Implementation, mimeo. T. Kunimoto (2004), Robust Implementation under Approximate Common Knowledge, mimeo. P. Legros and A. Newman (1999), Interference and Authority with Insecure Communication, mimeo. G. Lopomo (2000), Optimality and Robustness of the English Auction, mimeo. Z. Neeman (2001), The Relevance of Private Information in Mechanism Design, Journal of Economic Theory, forthcoming. A. Postelwaite and D. Schmeidler (1986), Implementation in Differential Information Economies, Journal of Economic Theory, 39, pp. 14-33. Recent surveys of implementation theory: R. Serrano (2004), The Theory of Implementation of Social Choice Rules, SIAM Review, 46, pp. 377-414. S. Baliga and E. Maskin (2003), Mechanism Design for the Environment, in K.G. Mäler and J. Vincent, eds., Handbook of Environmental Economics, vol. 1, Amsterdam: North-Holland, pp. 305-324. E. Maskin and T. Sjöström (2002), Implementation Theory, in K. Arrow, A. Sen, and K. Suzumura, eds., Handbook of Social Choice and Welfare, Amsterdam: North- Holland, pp. 237-288. M. Osborne and A. Rubinstein (1994), A Course in Game Theory, MIT Press, Cambridge, Chapter 10. T. Palfrey (2002), Implementation Theory, in R. Aumann and S. Hart, eds., Handbook of Game Theory, vol. 3, Amsterdam: North-Holland, pp 2271-2326. M. Jackson (2001), A Crash Course in Implementation Theory, Social Choice and Welfare, 18, pp. 655-708. B. Allen (1997), Implementation Theory with Incomplete Information, in S. Hart and A. Mas-Colell, eds., Cooperation: Game Theoretic Approaches, Heidelberg: Springer. 3

L. Corchon (1996), The Theory of Implementation of Socially Optimal Decisions in Economics, London: Macmillan. J. Moore (1992), Implementation, Contracts, and Renegotiation in Environments with Complete Information, in J.J. Laffont, ed., Advances in Economic Theory (Invited Surveys from the 6 th World Congress of the Econometric Society), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 182-282. T. Palfrey (1992), Implementation in Bayesian Equilibrium: The Multiple Equilibrium Problem in Mechanism Design, in J.J. Laffont ed., Advances in Economic Theory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 283-323. 3. Indescribable States, Renegotiation, and Incomplete Contracts L. Anderlini, L. Felli and A. Postlewaite (2001), Courts of Law and Unforeseen Contingencies, mimeo. Y. Che and D. Hausch (1999), Cooperative Investments and the Value of Contracting, American Economic Review, 89, 125-147. O. Hart and J. Moore (1999), Foundations of Incomplete Contracts, Review of Economic Studies, 66, 115-138. T. Lyon and E. Rasmusen (2001), Option Contracts and Renegotiation in Complex Environments, Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization (forthcoming). E. Maskin (2002), On Indescribable Contingencies and Incomplete Contracts, European Economic Review, 46, 725-733. E. Maskin and J. Moore (1999), Implementation and Renegotiation, Review of Economic Studies, 66, 39-56. E. Maskin and J. Tirole (1999), Unforeseen Contingencies and Incomplete Contracts, Review of Economic Studies, 66, 83-114. I. Segal (1999), Complexity and Renegotiation: A Foundation for Incomplete Contracts, Review of Economic Studies, 66, 57-82. I. Segal and M. Whinston (2002), The Mirrlees Approach to Mechanism Design with Renegotiation, Econometrica, 70, 1-45. J. Watson (2004), Contract, Mechanism Design, and Technological Detail, mimeo. 4

Recent surveys of contract design: P. Bolton, M. Dewatripont (2005), Contract Theory, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. J. J. Laffont and D. Martimort (2002), The Theory of Incentives: The Principal-Agent Model, Princeton University Press, Princeton and Oxford. 5