BRIDGING THE GAP: COLLABORATION USING NANOSAT AND CUBESAT PLATFORMS THROUGH THE TEXAS 2 STEP (2 SATELLITE TARGETING EXPERIMENTAL PLATFORM) MISSION

Similar documents
Proximity Operations Nano-Satellite Flight Demonstration (PONSFD) Overview

The TEXAS Satellite Design Laboratory: An Overview of Our Current Projects FASTRAC, BEVO-2, & ARMADILLO

The Future for CubeSats Present and Coming Launch Opportunities 18th Annual AIAA / USU Conference on Small Satellites CubeSat Workshop

CubeSat Proximity Operations Demonstration (CPOD) Mission Update Cal Poly CubeSat Workshop San Luis Obispo, CA

The Evolution of Nano-Satellite Proximity Operations In-Space Inspection Workshop 2017

The FASTRAC Experience: A Student Run Nanosatellite Program

Platform Independent Launch Vehicle Avionics

From the Delfi-C3 nano-satellite towards the Delfi-n3Xt nano-satellite

The FASTRAC Satellites

SNIPE mission for Space Weather Research. CubeSat Developers Workshop 2017 Jaejin Lee (KASI)

CubeSat Proximity Operations Demonstration (CPOD) Vehicle Avionics and Design

Small Satellites: The Execution and Launch of a GPS Radio Occultation Instrument in a 6U Nanosatellite

CubeSat Integration into the Space Situational Awareness Architecture

HYDROS Development of a CubeSat Water Electrolysis Propulsion System

The Nemo Bus: A Third Generation Nanosatellite Bus for Earth Monitoring and Observation

From Single to Formation Flying CubeSats: An Update of the Delfi Programme

Outernet: Development of a 1U Platform to Enable Low Cost Global Data Provision

Recent Advances in the CubeSat Kit Family

University of Kentucky Space Systems Laboratory. Jason Rexroat Space Systems Laboratory University of Kentucky

UKube-1 Platform Design. Craig Clark

RAX: The Radio Aurora explorer

Open Source Design: Corvus-BC Spacecraft. Brian Cooper, Kyle Leveque 9 August 2015

A novel spacecraft standard for a modular small satellite bus in an ORS environment

Reaching for the Stars

First Results From the GPS Compact Total Electron Content Sensor (CTECS) on the PSSCT-2 Nanosat

CubeSat based Rendezvous, Proximity Operations, and Docking in the CPOD Mission

CubeSat Developers Workshop 2014

Orbicraft Pro Complete CubeSat kit based on Raspberry-Pi

Research Activities on Small Satellite in HIT

The PROBA Missions Design Capabilities for Autonomous Guidance, Navigation and Control. Jean de Lafontaine President

In the summer of 2002, Sub-Orbital Technologies developed a low-altitude

Bridging the Gap: Collaboration Using Nanosat and CubeSat Platforms Through The Texas 2 STEP (2 Satellite Targeting Experimental Platform) Mission

ARMADILLO: Subsystem Booklet

Distributed EPS in a CubeSat Application. Robert Burt Space Dynamics Laboratory 1695 N Research Parkway;

10 August 2005 Utah State University Logan, UT

RAX: Lessons Learned in Our Spaceflight Endeavor

CubeSat Design Specification

CubeSat Standard Updates

A Standardized Geometry For Space Access Ports

CUBESATS: A COST-EFFICIENT WAY TO VALIDATE TECHNOLOGICAL BRICKS

PROCEEDINGS OF SPIE. Inter-satellite omnidirectional optical communicator for remote sensing

Status of Active Debris Removal (ADR) developments at the Swiss Space Center

Cesar Arza INTA 2009 CUBESAT DEVELOPERS WORKSHOP 23RD APRIL 2008

Introduction. Satellite Research Centre (SaRC)

DICE CubeSat Mission. Spring 2011 CubeSat Workshop April 20, 2011 Erik Stromberg,

Moog CSA Engineering CubeSat Payload Accommodations and Propulsive Adapters. 11 th Annual CubeSat Developer s Workshop 25 April 2014

KySat-2: Status Report and Overview of C&DH and Communications Systems Design

KUTESat. Pathfinder. Presented by: Marco Villa KUTESat Project Manager. Kansas Universities Technology Evaluation Satellite

CanX-2 and NTS Canada's Smallest Operational Satellites

Verification and Validation Methods for the Prox-1 Mission

Near Earth Asteroid (NEA) Scout CubeSat Mission

Phone: , Fax: , Germany

Attitude Determination and Control Specifications

The Kentucky Space Consortium th Quarter Update

Satellite Testing. Prepared by. A.Kaviyarasu Assistant Professor Department of Aerospace Engineering Madras Institute Of Technology Chromepet, Chennai

Naval Postgraduate School

Mission Goals. Brandi Casey (Project Manager)

SMART COMMUNICATION SATELLITE (SCS) PROJECT OVERVIEW. Jin JIN Space Center, Tsinghua University 2015/8/10

CUBESAT an OVERVIEW AEOLUS AERO TECH, Pvt. Ltd.

Lessons Learned from the US Air Force SENSE CubeSat Mission

MISC 3 3U nanosatellite Bus Hardware Revision: A

Brazilian Inter-University CubeSat Mission Overview

NanoSwarm: CubeSats Enabling a Discovery Class Mission Jordi Puig-Suari Tyvak Nano-Satellite Systems

7 Annual CubeSat Developers Workshop Cal Poly San Luis Obispo, April UniCubeSat

Enabling Space Sensor Networks with PCBSat

Small Satellites for Space Weather Research

AstroSat Workshop 12 August CubeSat Overview

GEM - Generic Engineering Model Overview

CAHIER DES CLAUSES TECHNIQUES PARTICULIÈRES PUMA N Objet du marché : SUPPLY OF CUBESAT COMPONENTS FOURNITURE DE COMPOSANTS CUBESAT

FRL's Demonstration and Science Experiments (DSX) rogram Quest for the Common Micro Satellite Bus

16 Oct 2014, Estavayer-le-Lac, Switzerland. TW-1: A Cubesat constellation for space networking experiments

Greenhouse Gas Monitoring for Industrial and Environmental Improvement Presenter: Jordan Backs

2013 RockSat-C Preliminary Design Review

InnoSat and MATS An Ingenious Spacecraft Platform applied to Mesospheric Tomography and Spectroscopy

I SARA 08/10/13. Pre-Decisional Information -- For Planning and Discussion Purposes Only

Poly Picosatellite Orbital Deployer Mk. III Rev. E User Guide

t: e: w: Mokslininkų str. 2A, LT Vilnius, Lithuania

Microsatellite Constellation for Earth Observation in the Thermal Infrared Region

Free-flying Satellite Inspector

The M-Cubed/COVE Mission

Nanosatellite Technologies and Services

DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT OF A MODULAR AND REUSABLE CUBESAT BUS

THE OPS-SAT NANOSATELLITE MISSION

On January 14, 2004, the President announced a new space exploration vision for NASA

University Nanosat Program

THE RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE USM NANOSATELLITE FOR REMOTE SENSING MISSION

David M. Klumpar Keith W. Mashburn Space Science and Engineering Laboratory Montana State University

GreenCube and RocketCube

Beyond CubeSats: Operational, Responsive, Nanosatellite Missions. 9th annual CubeSat Developers Workshop

USNA-0601 ParkinsonSAT Remote Data Relay (Psat) Cubesat Conference Aug 2012

A CubeSat-Based Optical Communication Network for Low Earth Orbit

Presented at The 1st Space Exploration and Kibo Utilization for Asia Workshop Thursday, 28 May 2015, LAPAN Headquarters, Jakarta, Indonesia 1

The NaoSat nanosatellite platform for in-flight radiation testing. Jose A Carrasco CEO EMXYS Spain

Geoff Crowley, Chad Fish, Charles Swenson, Gary Bust, Aroh Barjatya, Miguel Larsen, and USU Student Team

NetCubeSat and SDR Based Communication System for Climate Change Understanding

Aug 6 th, Presented by: Danielle George- Project Manager Erin McCaskey Systems Engineer. LSP-F , Rev. B

CubeSats: From Launch to Deployment Necessity for a standard.

Satellite Engineering BEST Course. CubeSats at ULg

Sensor & Actuator. Bus system and Mission system

Dynamics and Operations of an Orbiting Satellite Simulation. Requirements Specification 13 May 2009

Transcription:

BRIDGING THE GAP: COLLABORATION USING NANOSAT AND CUBESAT PLATFORMS THROUGH THE TEXAS 2 STEP (2 SATELLITE TARGETING EXPERIMENTAL PLATFORM) MISSION Cinnamon Wright, Dax Garner, Jessica Williams, Henri Kjellberg, E. Glenn Lightsey

OVERVIEW Background UT Satellite Programs Picosatellite Programs CubeSat PARADIGM Satellite Design Laboratory Collaboration Nanosatellite Programs Texas 2 STEP Texas 2 STEP Vehicles Chaser Spacecraft Target Spacecraft ARTEMIS vs. 2 STEP Design Nanosat and CubeSat Cooperation Texas 2 STEP Separation System Microgravity Experiment SHOT Collaboration Benefits Considerations Future Program Plans

BACKGROUND (UT SATELLITE PROGRAMS)

CUBESAT Blackfin/Tinyboards StenSat RX/TX Dipole antenna Original Bus Design Missions Wireless Communication Re-usable plug-and-play bus design using LabVIEW Embedded RTOS Increase the TRL of components for PARADIGM, 2 STEP, and FASTRAC Led the cooperation effort of Satellite Programs. Clyde Space 3U regulation board LiPo Batteries Spectrolab ITJ Solar Cells

PARADIGM NASA sponsored Working with A&M First Mission: Downlink 2 orbits worth of GPS data from the Dragon Last Mission: Rendezvous and docking 5 x 5 x 5 form factor

PARADIGM ADAPTATION Utilized much of CubeSat design Linux Embedded Dragon Receiver New custom CDH Board

TEXAS 2 STEP 1 Launch/Orbital Insertion 2 LV Separation 3 Checkout T 0 0:00 T LVsep T 0 + min T Health days Uplink Downlink 4 Chaser/Target Sep. T C/Tsep T LVsep + days 5 Drift T drift 1 hr 6 Initiate Rendezvous T ren T C/Tsep + 1 hr Xlink Xlink ~3 km 7 Controlled Return T ret 1 hr 8 Proximity Operations T prox 1 day (Until depletion of power or fuel supply) 9 End of Mission T end T 0 + 6 months min. ~150 m

2 STEP VEHICLES And the Adoption of a 3 Unit CubeSat for the Target Original ARTEMIS Chaser/Target Design Final ARTEMIS Chaser/Target Design Texas 2 STEP Chaser/Target Design

TEXAS 2 STEP CHASER R-134A Propulsion Bluetooth Verification Stensat radio Arcom VIPER Ampro Littleboard 800 QNX Operating System TEXAS 2 STEP TARGET Inherited mostly from CubeSat and PARADIGM Adheres to UNP and CubeSat standards

TEXAS 2 STEP GNC Chaser GNC Design Optical Energy Sun Sensor Orion GPS Honeywell HMC2003T Magnetometer MicroStrain 3DM-GX2 R-134A Cold Gas Propulsion System Target GNC Orion GPS

SATELLITE DESIGN LABORATORY COLLABORATION Began in 2007 Similar challenges. COTS for small low-cost satellites limited. Re-using satellite bus solutions. Ground Station Facilities

NANOSAT AND CUBESAT COOPERATION Texas 2 STEP Separation System Microgravity Experiment SHOT II Workshop

TEXAS 2 STEP SEPARATION SYSTEM AND MICROGRAVITY EXPERIMENT Cal Poly s P-POD Deployer

SHOT COLLABORATION UNP5 Balloon Launch Tested components which will go on all 3 satellites Power systems Bluetooth verification Communication Software

BENEFITS Eliminate the need for duplicate system design. Design -to- fabrication time shrinks. Team cooperation and support. CONSIDERATIONS CubeSat standard hardware does not always meet the University Nanosatellite Program Standards. It is more difficult to design something more universal. Need to examine new technologies still exists.

FUTURE PROGRAMS Now have heritage from FASTRAC, ARTEMIS, CubeSat, PARADIGM, and TEXAS 2 STEP Advantages of previous bus designs. Advantages of easily adaptable CubeSat standards.

THANK YOU! Advisors Dr. E. Glenn Lightsey Dr. Robert H. Bishop Dr. Sean Buckley Dr. Matthew Hall Lisa Guerra Dr. Cesar Ocampo

REFERENCES Toorian, Armen, et al. "CubeSats As Responsive Satellites." AIAA Proceedings, Long Beach, California, August 30, 2005. Pumpkin CubeSat Kit TM. Pumpkin, Inc. http://www.cubesatkit.com, accessed, May 2008. 1U CubeSat Power Datasheet. Clyde Space Ltd. http://www.clyde-space.com accessed, June 2008. Poly Picosatellite Orbital Deployer Mk III ICD California Polytechic University http://cubesat.atl.calpoly.edu/media/p-pod%20mk%20iii%20icd.pdf accessed, June 2008. IMI-101 Miniature 3-Axis Reaction Wheel Product Specification. IntelliTech Microsystems, Inc. Autonomous Vehicle Technologies. http://www.imicro.biz space.html accessed, June 2008. MTi Miniature Attitude and Heading Reference System XSENS Motion Technologies. http://www.xsens.com accessed, June 2008. Sun Sensors Optical Enegy Technologies Inc. http://www.opticalenergy.com accessed, June 2008. Three Axis Magnetic Sensor Hybrid Honeywell. http://www.ssec.honeywell.com/magnetic/datasheets/hmc2003.pdf accessed, June 2008.