City of Kingston Report to Council Report Number

Similar documents
City of Kingston Report to Council Report Number

Public Report. Community Services. The purpose of this report is to present and obtain approval of the Public Art Policy.

261 Gorham Road South Portland, ME Company Profile

Art in Public Spaces Policy. City of Burlington

City of Oshawa Public Art Policy

ART COLLECTION POLICY

MUNICIPALITY OF SIOUX LOOKOUT. Policy Manual POLICY REVIEW DATE NO. OF PAGES REVISIONS ADMINISTERED BY. Economic Development Office

Objective 3.1: Provide or stimulate provision by the private sector of affordable housing units.

International Sculpture Garden Relationship Statement

-and- (the Artist ) maquette means the drawing or model, prepared by the Artist, of the proposed Art Work;

Caroline Thomas Chief Counsel, Exploration, Property & Aboriginal Affairs, Vale. Paul MacLean President, EEM Sustainable Management

BOARD POLICY COLLECTIONS

Ruapehu Alpine Lifts. Whakapapa Electrical Network Strategy. Summary Consultation Document. 15 December 2016

MUSEUM SERVICE ACT I. BASIC PROVISIONS

DISPOSITION POLICY. This Policy was approved by the Board of Trustees on March 14, 2017.

Medtronic Loan Agreement: Bridging the Gap Program

Welcome Aboard! 2 8,000 completed projects worldwide 50,000 berths installed worldwide

Infrastructure Funding Panel

Special Meeting August 11, 2011

ORANGE REGIONAL MUSEUM HERITAGE COLLECTION POLICY

Building Canada s Advanced Wireless Networks: Protocol Development

COAL CREEK COMMUNITY PARK MUSEUM AND COLLECTION POLICY

HOTELS, TOURISM & LEISURE. Hotels, Tourism & Leisure

Recreation and Culture

CITY OF RICE LAKE COUNTY OF ST. LOUIS ORDINANCE NO. 52 AN ORDINANCE REGULATING SMALL CELL WIRELESS FACILITIES IN THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY.

Strategic Plan Engaging People with Art

3 Economic Development

What We Heard Report Inspection Modernization: The Case for Change Consultation from June 1 to July 31, 2012

The City of Kawartha Lakes Public Library

THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF ENNISKILLEN

Public Art Network Best Practice Goals and Guidelines

Intellectual Property

An Experienced Approach to Private Equity

ARGYLE TOWNSHIP COURT HOUSE & ARCHIVES (ATCHA) PUBLIC ACCESS & REFERENCE POLICY

Art Display Policy SUBJECT: Policy No: Date: October 17, Revision Date: October Number of Pages: 7

A powerful voice for your business

Marine Renewable-energy Application

Staff: Interim Executive Director. Business Development Director Environmental Programs Director. Planning and Development Director

Technology transactions and outsourcing deals: a practitioner s perspective. Michel Jaccard

clarify the roles of the Department and minerals industry in consultation; and

8(A) CONTRACTING, MENTOR-PROTÉGÉ PROGRAM, & JOINT VENTURES. March 9, 2010 William T. Welch

TOWN OF MORAGA ART IN PUBLIC SPACES POLICY

MANAGEMENT DIRECTIVE CONTRACTOR ALERT REPORTING DATABASE (CARD)

PORT OF POOLE DEVELOPING FOR THE FUTURE

PUBLIC ART PROCUREMENT GUIDELINES

SECTION 35 ANTENNAS AND TOWERS

We do banking differently to keep you a step ahead in life.

YELLOWKNIFE GUILD OF ARTS AND CRAFTS

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN ANCI AND THE MINISTRY OF COMMUNICATIONS

IDA ANNUAL MEETING COUNTY CONFERENCE ROOM LAKE PLEASANT, NY JANUARY 18, 2011

Establishment of Electrical Safety Regulations Governing Generation, Transmission and Distribution of Electricity in Ontario

NEW LIBERTY GOLD MINE: GOLD RECOVERIES IMPROVING

SATELLITE NETWORK NOTIFICATION AND COORDINATION REGULATIONS 2007 BR 94/2007

HOUSE OF COMMONS JOB DESCRIPTION

Consultation on Amendments to Industry Canada s Antenna Tower Siting Procedures

Experienced project management Total flexibility of the workforce Modern drydocking facilities

Sec Radio, television, satellite dish and communications antennas and towers.

NOTICE OF THE 197TH ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

LAW ON TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER 1998

The New Enterprise Allowance Programme (NEA) Link Up Start Up Presentation

POLICY NUMBER: P

Form ADV Part 2B Individual Disclosure Brochure. Alyssa Rakovich AIF

Herefordshire CCG Patient Choice and Resource Allocation Policy

Toronto Reference Library Premium Rental Space Renovation Award of Tender

SAN DIEGO CITY SCHOOLS

OFFICER DECISION RECORD

REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF CITY OPERATIONS AGENDA ITEM: 7 PORTFOLIO: TRANSPORT, PLANNING & SUSTAINABILITY (COUNCILLOR RAMESH PATEL)

Britco Group. Transaction snapshot

CARL F. WOLF, CMM, CMI Marina/Boatyard Expert

PACIFIC DRILLING S.A.

The Royal Saskatchewan Museum Act

Accelerating the Deployment of Offshore Renewable Energy Technologies. IEA Implementing Agreement on Renewable Energy Technology Deployment

University of Houston System. System-wide Public Art Committee (SPAC) Operating Procedures Manual

CAPITAL COMMITTEE December 7, 2017 MEETING AGENDA 10:00 AM. 125 Worth Street, Room th Floor Board Room

Marine Research Programme

Brief to the. Senate Standing Committee on Social Affairs, Science and Technology. Dr. Eliot A. Phillipson President and CEO

INDEX OF SPECIFICATIONS SECTION F SPECIAL CONDITIONS DIVISION 1 - GENERAL REQUIREMENTS:


Policy Research Corporation

AURORA PUBLIC LIBRARY PUBLIC ART POLICY

CITY OF HANOVER ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MINUTES June 14, 2012

New York Bar admission (or eligibility to obtain admission promptly) is required.

Standing Committee on Finance and Economic Affairs (Ontario) Pre-budget Consultations Submission by Ontarians for the Arts Friday, January 19, 2018

PATENT AND LICENSING POLICY SUMMARY

Art Collection Policy

Policy Research Corporation

INTELLIGENT ENGINEERING

GUIDELINES FOR THE APPLICATION FOR A SPACE STATION CARRIER LICENCE. Section 1 - Introduction

BACK TO WORK ENTERPRISE

2. As such, Proponents of Antenna Systems do not require permitting of any kind from the Town.

Town of Los Altos Hills Art in Public Places Committee and Policy

David Romanow, Chief Executive Officer

EMPLOYEE SECONDMENT AGREEMENT

Investor Update. April 14, 2015

Rules of Usage for the BESSY II Electron Storage Ring and the BER II Neutron Source at the Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin für Materialien and Energie GmbH

PUBLIC ART POLICY AND PROCEDURES FOR REZONED DEVELOPMENTS

TRAFFIC ENGINEERING DIVISION

They Build on Great Relationships... It s in. their DNA

REQUEST FOR EXPRESSIONS OF INTEREST

TERMS AND CONDITIONS. for the use of the IMDS Advanced Interface by IMDS-AI using companies

Transcription:

To: From: Resource Staff: Date of Meeting: Subject: Executive Summary: City of Kingston Report to Council Report Number 16-235 Mayor and Members of Council Gerard Hunt, Chief Administrative Officer Lanie Hurdle, Commissioner, Community Services Marine Museum of the Great Lakes Temporary Relocation and Long Term Options The location of the Marine Museum of the Great Lakes (Marine Museum) including the Dry Dock was disposed of by the federal government on the private market in 2015. The private developer (property owner) that acquired the Dry Dock property and the Marine Museum that has occupied the site for many decades have had a number of discussions and meetings but have been unable to reach an agreement that would enable the Museum to continue its operations at its current location. Therefore, the Marine Museum has been working on a plan to relocate its operations and its ship, the Alexander Henry by August 23, 2016, which is the date by which the Marine Museum has to vacate the property. City staff recognize that the Marine Museum is an important asset to the community and to tourism. Staff have been working with the Marine Museum to discuss temporary as well as longer term solutions that would enable the Marine Museum s operations, collections and the Alexander Henry to remain within the Kingston area. Based on discussions and options explored for the operations of the Marine Museum, it was determined by the Marine Museum Board of Directors that the Portsmouth Olympic Harbour facility would be the best option for the continued operations of the Marine Museum and the storage of its collections. Staff have reviewed this option and have confirmed that the space is available without impacting other events/programs. It is understood that the Marine Museum s operations at the Portsmouth Olympic Harbour facility would be temporary over the next couple of years while the visioning exercise is completed and new development plans for the site are implemented. Staff are recommending the space be provided to the Marine Museum at no cost as a licensing agreement under the Community Leasing Policy. Two other options that were Special Council Meeting 18 1

Page 2 of 9 considered but are not being recommended were to maintain the Marine Museum operations at the Dry Dock until June 2017 or for them to rent a small space downtown to maintain a storefront presence. Those two options are described in the Options/Discussion section of this report. Interim and long term options for the Alexander Henry are more complex and time sensitive, which require a special meeting of Council prior to July 12 th. All parties involved in discussions agreed that the ideal long term solution would be to have the Alexander Henry remain within the Kingston area and, more specifically, to utilize the ship to create an artificial dive reef within Lake Ontario. In order for that to happen, the Marine Museum needs to complete an assessment of the feasibility to clean the Alexander Henry and prepare it so it could be sunk in Lake Ontario, work that will take a number of months to complete. Options to provide the appropriate time to complete this assessment were explored and, as a result, the recommended option is to relocate the Alexander Henry at the dock of Picton Terminals for the next year. This relocation would have to take place within the next week as the water levels of Lake Ontario are going to continue to drop and it would be impossible to move the Alexander Henry later in July. The dock at Picton Terminal is owned and operated by Doornekamp Construction. The relocation of the Alexander Henry would be performed by Doornekamp Construction and Drew Harrison Haulage Ltd. The cost for this relocation along with a year of mooring at the dock in Picton would total $100,000, including insurance coverage during the relocation and mooring. In this scenario, it is proposed the Marine Museum would fund $25,000 of the cost and the City would fund the remaining $75,000. This would provide the Marine Museum with one year to complete the assessment work required to determine the feasibility and cost to sink the Alexander Henry to create an artificial dive reef. The work, associated costs and sources of financing would be reported to Council prior to the one year period. Should the creation of an artificial dive reef not be feasible, then Doornekamp Construction has agreed it would be able to dispose of the Alexander Henry for an additional cost of $326,000. A letter of guarantee would be required from the City immediately to ensure payment should this option prove necessary. The total cost under the letter of guarantee would be funded 50/50 between the City and the Marine Museum should this be the only option after an assessment is completed. Funding is requested in this report for the City share ($163,000) intended as matching a fundraising effort by the Marine Museum. A number of other options have been considered, including keeping the Marine Museum in its current location or relocating it elsewhere. Those are detailed in the Options/Discussion section of this report. Recommendation: That Council authorize the Mayor and Clerk to sign a community license agreement between the City of Kingston and the Marine Museum of the Great Lakes starting in July 2016, at an annual rate of $1 per year, for a period of two (2) years with an option to renew for another two Special Council Meeting 18 2

Page 3 of 9 (2) years for the use of operational and storage space at the Portsmouth Olympic Harbour facility to the satisfaction of the Director of Legal Services; and That Council approve a grant of $75,000 from the Working Fund Reserve to the Marine Museum of the Great Lakes in order to fund the relocation and mooring of the Alexander Henry at the dock of Picton Terminals which is owned and operated by Doornekamp Construction; and That Council direct staff to issue a letter of guarantee for an additional $326,000 to Doornekamp Construction, payable in one year, should the disposal of the Alexander Henry be required at that time; and That Council approve the provision of a matching grant of $163,000 (50%) to the Marine Museum of the Great Lakes from the Working Fund Reserve should the $326,000 be payable in one year; and That Council direct staff to report back within ten (10) months on the feasibility, associated costs and financing of the option to utilize the Alexander Henry to create an artificial dive reef in Lake Ontario. Special Council Meeting 18 3

Page 4 of 9 Authorizing Signatures: Lanie Hurdle, Commissioner, Community Services Gerard Hunt, Chief Administrative Officer Consultation with the following Members of the Corporate Management Team: Denis Leger, Transportation, Facilities & Emergency Services Not required Jim Keech, President and CEO, Utilities Kingston Not required Desiree Kennedy, Chief Financial Officer & City Treasurer Special Council Meeting 18 4

Options/Discussion: Page 5 of 9 The sale of the Kingston Dry Dock (Dry Dock) property was completed in January 2016 and there have been ongoing discussions between City staff, the Marine Museum of the Great Lakes (Marine Museum) and the new property owner regarding the future of the Marine Museum at its current location. These discussions were not successful and, as a result, the property owner provided the prescribed notice of 120 days which means that the Marine Museum has to vacate the property by August 23, 2016. In April 2016, the Marine Museum provided a communication advising the City of its intent to move to a new location which would include short term storage and the maintenance of storefront operations. Since then, City staff have had multiple discussions with the Marine Museum and other parties to identify options for both ongoing operations/storage of the Museum collections as well as options for dealing with the ship, the Alexander Henry. City staff and the Marine Museum took the following objectives and requirements into consideration while reviewing the options for the future operations and location of the Marine Museum and its assets: The Marine Museum needs to maintain ongoing operations, even with a reduced scope, in order to continue to qualify as a Class A museum in good standing as defined by the Canadian Cultural Property Export Review Board. What that means is the Museum will continue to be able to receive artifact donations and issue tax receipts. Maintaining this status will also help to ensure the Marine Museum continues to receive funding through the Community Museum Operating Grant (CMOG) program administered by the Ontario Ministry of Tourism, Culture and Sport. The Marine Museum has already loaned and distributed some of its collections to other museums on a temporary basis. The Marine Museum has also packed many of its remaining artifacts and collections in preparation for a relocation this summer. The Portsmouth Olympic Harbour facility was identified as a location that could accommodate the operational and storage needs of the Marine Museum on a temporary basis, while the visioning exercise for the Kingston Penitentiary and Portsmouth Olympic Harbour is completed and plans for redevelopment are implemented. The future operations of the Marine Museum will be considered as part of the visioning exercise. The Marine Museum had identified another temporary location in the downtown for its ongoing operations but that space is much smaller and could not accommodate storage. Therefore, the Portsmouth Olympic Harbour facility location is the preferred option. All parties involved in discussions of the future of the Alexander Henry agreed the ship should remain within the Kingston area and ideally in the form of an artificial dive reef within Lake Ontario as an additional tourist attraction. In order to determine the feasibility of this option, the Marine Museum needs to complete an assessment of the work required to prepare the ship along with the associated costs and potential financing. It is anticipated this assessment will take close to one year and therefore, a stable and secured location is required for the Alexander Henry over the next year. City staff would continue to work closely with the Marine Museum through this process. Special Council Meeting 18 5

Page 6 of 9 Whether or not the artificial dive reef option is feasible, the Alexander Henry would have to be relocated to another dock either within the next few weeks, due to changing water levels, or next year. If the artificial dive reef option is feasible, the Alexander Henry would be relocated to enable proper preparation of the ship. If the artificial dive reef option is not feasible, the Alexander Henry would have to be towed to be disposed of at another location. The issue is related to timing to successfully move the ship and the financial commitment based on such determinations being this year or in 2017. The following outlines the three (3) main options that were reviewed and considered by City staff and Marine Museum. Option 1 Relocate the Alexander Henry to Picton This option includes the relocation of the Marine Museum operations/storage prior to August 23 rd to the Portsmouth Olympic Harbour facility. The Marine Museum operations and storage would occupy the space that was recently vacated by the Client Service Centre which relocated to 362 Montreal Street. It is proposed that a community license agreement be established between the City and the Marine Museum under the City Revenue Leasing and Licensing Policy and that the space be provided at no cost for a period of two (2) years with a potential extension for an additional two (2) years. It is proposed that the ship, Alexander Henry, be moved out of the Dry Dock by tug boat and taken to be berthed in Picton. The move would be undertaken by Doornekamp Construction in partnership with Drew Harrison Haulage Ltd., which is an experienced tug and dock operation firm. The Alexander Henry would be taken to the dock of Picton Terminals which is owned and operated by the owners of Doornekamp Construction. It would be then safely moored at Picton for the next year while the proposal to create a dive site is assessed. Steps involved in the moving of the ship include: obtaining any approvals and giving all notices required in preparation for towing the ship; inspecting the ship to ensure it is fit for towing to Picton; providing expertise and insurances through Drew Harrison Haulage Ltd. to ensure the move is undertaken safely; opening the Dry Dock gates to allow the Alexander Henry to exit safely; lifting the gate either by crane or airbag if necessary; reclosing the Dry Dock; towing the ship from Kingston to Picton; and mooring the ship at the facilities of Picton Terminals for at least one year to allow for preparation of a dive reef project and fundraising drive. In the last few years, Doornekamp Construction has undertaken the reconstruction of the Dry Dock and the installation of a new dry dock gate system. Doornekamp Construction has a detailed understanding of the structures which make up the Dry Dock and is confident that this approach is the one best suited to ensure the successful removal of the Alexander Henry from its current location. Staff anticipate that environmental permits from federal and provincial Special Council Meeting 18 6

Page 7 of 9 agencies will be required to undertake the work. The City s funding agreement will require the Marine Museum to assign permitting responsibility to Doornekamp Construction. The cost associated with this option includes an initial $100,000 to be funded by the Marine Museum ($25,000) and the City ($75,000). Costs related to the feasibility to create an artificial dive reef would be identified through the assessment work required and reported back to Council along with financing options. It is recommended that this be done within the next ten (10) months. Should the artificial dive reef option not be feasible, an additional $326,000 would be required to dispose of the Alexander Henry. Doornekamp Construction is requiring a letter of guarantee for the $326,000 which would be payable in one year should the disposal option be the most viable. It is proposed that the $326,000 would be financed 50/50 by the Marine Museum and the City. Staff is recommending this option. Option 2 Leave the Alexander Henry at Dry Dock This option would enable the Marine Museum to continue its operations and leave the Alexander Henry at the Dry Dock property until June 1, 2017. The property owner would have the ability to extend this time frame by another six (6) months at its own discretion. The cost to remain on site would be $50,000 until June 1, 2017. The property owner indicated that it is his intent to donate the $50,000 back to a charity of his choice. The property taxes applicable to the operations of the Marine Museum on site would also need to be addressed by providing a grant to help cover taxes. This option would provide the Marine Museum with sufficient time to complete its assessment of the feasibility to utilize the Alexander Henry to create an artificial dive reef. Even if this option was selected, ultimately, the Alexander Henry would need to be relocated. The relocation could be for disposal or for preparation of the Alexander Henry to create an artificial dive reef. The preparation work could not be performed at the Dry Dock property. Therefore, the cost to relocate for preparation would be in the range of $100,000 in June 2017 and the cost of disposal would be in the range of $426,000 at that time as well. The additional year at the Dry Dock would only add to the longer term costs as relocation would be required no matter what long term option proved to be feasible. With this option, the operations of the Marine Museum could remain on the Dry Dock property until at least June 1, 2017 or relocate this season. The Marine Museum has indicated that it has already put some of its collections on loan to other museums, have packed most of the remaining collections and have indicated that a relocation would be best at this time. The relocation to the Portsmouth Olympic Harbour facility has been identified as the preferable option by the Marine Museum Board of Director. Staff is not recommending this option. Option 3 Disposal of the Alexander Henry This option would enable the immediate disposal of the Alexander Henry for a cost of $426,000. Doornekamp Construction and Drew Harrison Haulage Ltd. would follow the same process as Special Council Meeting 18 7

Page 8 of 9 detailed in Option 1, except the Alexander Henry would not be moored for one (1) year in Picton. The Alexander Henry would be disposed of and there would be no assessment of the potential for the creation of an artificial dive reef. The proposed funding structure would be the same as what is outlined in Option 1. This means that the City would fund a total of $238,000 and the Marine Museum would fund $188,000. The Marine Museum operations and storage would be located at Portsmouth Olympic Harbour at no cost as described in Option 1, which means that there would be a license agreement for a period of two (2) years with a potential extension for an additional two (2) years. Staff is not recommending this option. Existing Policy/By-Law: The proposed license agreement complies with the terms for a Community License under the City Revenue Leasing and Licensing Policy. The agreement will be a license in which the Marine Museum will be open during the operating hours of the Portsmouth Olympic Harbour facility and will share common facilities with others. Notice Provisions: Not applicable Accessibility Considerations: Not applicable Financial Considerations: The Marine Museum of the Great Lakes requires a total of $100,000 to tow the Alexander Henry out of the Dry Dock and moor it at the dock of Picton Terminals for a period of one year. The Marine Museum will contribute $25,000 and City staff are recommending that the City contributes $75,000, to be funded from the Working Fund Reserve. The one year period will enable the Marine Museum to assess the viability of preparing the Alexander Henry to turn it into an artificial dive reef for tourism purpose. Should the option to create an artificial dive reef be viable, an updated cost and sources of funding will be identified. Staff would report this information back to Council. Should the option of the artificial dive reef not be feasible, there would be an additional cost of $326,000 to dispose of the Alexander Henry at that point. It is recommended that the City provide a letter of guarantee for that amount, which would be payable at the end of the one year period, should the disposal be the most viable option. It is proposed that the $326,000 would be funded 50/50 between the City and the Marine Museum. Contacts: Lanie Hurdle, Commissioner, Community Services 613-546-4291 extension 1231 Special Council Meeting 18 8

Page 9 of 9 Other City of Kingston Staff Consulted: Alan McLeod, Senior Legal Counsel Colin Wiginton, Cultural Director Luke Follwell, Director, Recreation & Leisure Services Paige Agnew, Director, Planning, Building & Licensing Services Paul MacLatchy, Director, Environment & Sustainable Initiatives Exhibits Attached: Not applicable Special Council Meeting 18 9