Wisconsin Bald Eagle and Osprey Surveys

Similar documents
Wisconsin Bald Eagle and Osprey Nest Surveys 2015

Wisconsin Bald Eagle and Osprey Nest Surveys 2016

Coordination Guideline. Application of Selective Access

STATE OF WISCONSIN AMBER ALERT PROGRAM BROADCASTER/CABLE OPERATOR GUIDANCE DOCUMENT

APPENDIX A: TABLE OF MONITORING ASSIGNMENTS

APPENDIX A: TABLE OF MONITORING ASSIGNMENTS for Legacy EAS

Bird City Wisconsin Addresses Invasives

Counties in Wisconsin Currently Offering CLTS Services

2018 Wisconsin QSO Party RULES

Sponsorship ON WISCONSIN PUBLIC RADIO. Good for your community and your bottom line. wpr.org

Sponsorship ON WISCONSIN PUBLIC RADIO. Good for your community and your bottom line. wpr.org

Sponsorship ON WISCONSIN PUBLIC RADIO. Good for your community and your bottom line. wpr.org

Years Strong 2016 ANNUAL REPORT Advancing our mission to Grow Businesses, Create Jobs and Build Communities

INSTRUMENT APPROACH PROCEDURE CHARTS IFR ALTERNATE AIRPORT MINIMUMS

Property Taxes. Transp. Aids. Gen'l. Exp. Shared Rev. Noncapital/debt. Public Works

Wisconsin Red-shouldered Hawk Survey

Watching for Whoopers in Wisconsin Wetlands

Wisconsin RXR 2016 Store Information 2016 Row 2016 Plates A Little Piece of Mind 1023 North Knowles Ave New Richmond Antoinette's Quilt

Step-by-Step Instructions for Documenting Compliance on the Bald Eagle Form For WSDOT s On-Call Consultants

Each spring, the Minnesota DNR coordinates statewide ruffed grouse (Bonasa

Each spring, the Minnesota DNR coordinates statewide ruffed grouse (Bonasa

2015 MINNESOTA SPRING GROUSE SURVEYS

Black Tern Sightings in Minnesota:

Golden Eagle (Aquila chrysaetos) Management Indicator Species Assessment Ochoco National Forest

WESTERN GREAT LAKES REGION OWL MONITORING SURVEY

Bald Eagle and Osprey Nest Survey Study Plan for Energy Northwest's Packwood Lake Hydroelectric Project FERC No Lewis County, Washington

2018 Minnesota Spring Grouse surveys

Application Highlights

STATE OF WISCONSIN EMERGENCY ALERT SYSTEM STATE EAS PLAN

Bald Eagle Annual Report February 1, 2016

Bald Eagles Productivity Summary Lake Clark National Park and Preserve Cook Inlet Coastline

University of Wisconsin System (WI Act 28) Report on Remedial Education Fall 2017 Immediate New Freshmen from Wisconsin High Schools

BALD EAGLE MANAGEMENT 2014 ANNUAL REPORT

2012 Bat Roost Monitoring Report

2017 Annual Volunteer Report

2015 Wisconsin Row by Row

Rocky Reach Wildlife Forum 2017 Wildlife Monitoring Proposal FINAL

PLAN B Natural Heritage

Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources

Update on Northern Long-eared Bat in Minnesota

Bald Eagle Recovery Questions and Answers

Project Title: Migration patterns, habitat use, and harvest characteristics of long-tailed ducks wintering on Lake Michigan.

2017 Monarch Butterfly Conservation Fund Grant Slate

Wisconsin State Crime Stoppers Program Directory Page 1

Wisconsin State Crime Stoppers Program Directory Page 1

US Army Corps of Engineers Rock Island District

Cat Island Chain Restoration Project Brown County Port & Resource Recovery Department

Working with others to conserve, protect, and enhance fish, wildlife, plants, and their habitats for the continuing benefit of the American people.

Study Surveys of Eagles and Other Raptors

NEW WISCONSIN BUTTERFLY RECORDS

Peregrine Falcon Falco peregrinus

BALD EAGLE NIGHT ROOST SURVEYS

To provide a more efficient summary of the data collected on the flora and fauna encountered during these ecological assessments, Taylor Computer

Aphrodite Fritillary. Speyeria aphrodite. Identifying characteristics. Similar species. Wisconsin Butterflies. butterflies tiger beetles robber flies

Barn Owl and Screech Owl Research and Management

US Army Corps of Engineers Rock Island District

Foreign Currency Exchange Services Locations ARIZONA ILLINOIS

Appendix A.6: Call-Response Surveys For Red-Shouldered Hawk

Priest Rapids Hydroelectric Project No Annual Report for the Bald Eagle Perch/Roost Protection Plan Pursuant FERC Article 414

Massachusetts Grassland Bird Conservation. Intro to the problem What s known Your ideas

Project Title: Barn owl nesting structures at Chichaqua Bottoms Greenbelt

Listed Birds along the Stony Brook Corridor Impacted by BMS Zoning Change

Memorandum. Introduction

MINNESOTA NAWCA PROJECTS

Mixed Conifer Working Group Meeting February 17, 2011 Wildlife Habitat Management Considerations

BALD EAGLE MANAGEMENT 2012 ANNUAL REPORT

PART FIVE: Grassland and Field Habitat Management

McKay Creek National Wildlife Refuge BCS number: 48-19

Mystic Lake Hydroelectric Project FERC Project Number Year Bald Eagle Monitoring Summary Report Public

WESTERN GREAT LAKES REGION OWL MONITORING SURVEY

THE COMMON LOON. Population Status and Fall Migration in Minnesota MINNESOTA ORNITHOLOGISTS UNION OCCASIONAL PAPERS: NUMBER 3

The Adirondack Tremolo

ARTIFICIAL NEST STRUCTURES AND GRASSLAND RAPTORS

January/February Meetings. President s Message By Dan Jackson

Engaging Citizen Scientists & Landowners Through Bioblitzes

Boreal Owl Minnesota Conservation Summary

Greenlaw Mountain Hawk Watch Fall 2012

Bucks Creek Hydroelectric Project, FERC Project No. 619 Revised Study Plan

Wood Stork Nesting Population Survey Results 2016 and Radio-tracking Dice

Conserving Rafinesque s Big-eared Bats and Southeastern Myotis Roosting Habitat in Arkansas

Jackson Bottom Wetlands Preserve BCS Number: 47-14

Aurora borealis over abandoned farmstead. Shanagolden, WI. March 17, 2015

Whooping Crane Eastern Partnership Five Year Strategic Plan

A.11 BALD EAGLE (HALIAEETUS. Species Distribution and Status

PENNSYLVANIA GAME COMMISSION BUREAU OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT RESEARCH DIVISION PROJECT ANNUAL JOB REPORT

EagleWatch By The Numbers ( ) 511 nest monitored statewide volunteers & partners. 7,200 reports of nest activity

North American Wetlands Conservation Act

Bald Eagle Wintering Activity Rocky Reach Reservoir

Alberta Conservation Association 2008/09 Project Summary Report

FATHER HENNEPIN STATE PARK

Control of Non native Phragmites within the Great Lakes Basins: A Case Study in Invasive Species Strategic Planning and Implementation

THE ROLE OF SCIENCE IN WESTERN GRAY SQUIRREL ENHANCEMENT IN OAK WOODLANDS OF SOUTH PUGET SOUND

Reducing NN Phragmites and Tall Manna Grass Threats to Your Waters! Brock Woods UWEX & WDNR (608)

THE COMMON LOON. Population Status and Fall Migration in Minnesota MINNESOTA ORNITHOLOGISTS UNION OCCASIONAL PAPERS: NUMBER 3

Upper Great Lakes Young Forest Initiative. Four year Accomplishment Report for Wisconsin Nov Prepared by Amber Roth

Wisconsin Technical College System Veterans Certifying Officials - FY14

Conserving Purple Martins on McDonald-Dunn Forest, Benton County, Oregon

OSPREY NEST STRUCTURES 2013 ANNUAL REPORT

Sauvie Island Wildlife Area BCS number: 47-28

Final Environmental Assessment for the Issuance of an Eagle Incidental Take Permit to Garrett Construction Company LLC

Transcription:

Wisconsin Bald Eagle and Osprey Surveys - 20 20 Project Staff: Jim Woodford - Rhinelander Bruce Bacon Mercer Pat Collins Baldwin Steve Easterly Oshkosh Ron Eckstein Rhinelander Dean Edlin La Crosse Seth Fisher Elkhorn Dan Goltz Boscobel Erin Grossman Bancroft Carly Lapin Rhinelander Ryan Magana Spooner Michael Meyer - Rhinelander Bald Eagle near Star Lake, WI Credit: Michele Woodford Summary Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (WDNR) staff from the Natural Heritage Conservation, Wildlife Management and Remediation and Redevelopment programs completed aerial nesting surveys for bald eagles and ospreys in cooperation with WDNR pilots in spring and early summer 20. This marked the st consecutive year that these important wildlife surveys have been completed in Wisconsin, which makes it one of longest running surveys of its kind in North America. Surveys found, occupied eagle nests and occupied osprey nests, both of which were record highs in the state. Observers reported,0 bald eagle nestlings and a statewide nest success rate of % during productivity surveys that occurred in May and June. Nest success by survey area for eagles ranged from 2-00%. Occupied eagle nests were found in of 2 (9%) counties, and of 2 (9%) counties had occupied osprey nests. Additional project work included nest management guidance, construction project reviews, forest management guidance, and winter eagle roost counts along the lower Wisconsin River. Acknowledgments Local eagle and osprey nest information was provided by Rebecca Key (NPS), Patrick Ready, Sergei Postupalsky, Rex Runke, and numerous WDNR field staff. Bald eagle nest data for many of the nests within the Upper Mississippi River National Wildlife and Fish Refuge was provided by Brian Stemper (US Fish and Wildlife Service - La Crosse).

Funding for this project was provided through the WDNR s Federal Wildlife Restoration Grant (W-0-P) and through donations made by citizens and partners to the Forest Raptor gift account within the Bureau of Natural Heritage Conservation. Additional support was received from the National Park Service (NPS), WDNR s Bureau of Science Services, WDNR s Division of Forestry, Wisconsin Public Service, and Wausau Papers. Bald Eagles All nest surveys were completed using a WDNR aircraft and pilot and at least one other trained observer. The first bald eagle survey was flown in early April to locate occupied nests and the second survey was flown in late May and June to count young and determine nest success. Additional ground observations were provided by landowners, birders, volunteers, and raptor banders; this information is used to supplement and check aerial data. Regional reports were developed by area observers (Appendix ) that detail bald eagle and osprey nest locations and provide summarized information on productivity rates by county. There were, eagle nests occupied by breeding adults in 20 (Figure ). This was an increase of pairs from 202 and the highest ever recorded in Wisconsin (Figure 2). An occupied nest was defined as a nest where one or more of the following was observed: incubation, eggs, young, or a repaired nest. Vilas (n = ) and Oneida (n = ) counties had the highest number of occupied eagle nests. These two counties represent most of the Northern Highland Ecological Landscape, which has one of the highest concentrations of lakes in the world. Bald eagles occupied nests in of the state s 2 counties (9%; Figure ), and the number of occupied nests continued to increase in the southern, eastern, and west-central portions of the state (survey areas 2,,,, and ; Appendix ). The number of occupied eagle nests decreased slightly in the central and northwestern portions of the state (survey areas and ; Appendix ). Observers were able to record productivity observations at,8 of the occupied eagle nests in Wisconsin (Table ) during the second survey. The other nests reported as occupied during the first survey either were not checked or were obscured from view. This normally occurred in nests located in deciduous trees that had fully leafed-out. At least,0 young were observed in 8 successful nests, which resulted in an average of 0.89 young per occupied nest for those nests with known outcomes and. young per successful nest. Nest success for those nests with known outcomes was %. For successful nests, 0% produced one young, 8% two young, and 2% three young. Along the Mississippi and lower St. Croix rivers it can be difficult to determine the total number of occupied territories. Eagles nest close together in these areas and pairs may nest in Wisconsin one year and move across the river channel to Minnesota or Iowa for the next. Surveys in the counties along the Mississippi and lower St. Croix rivers (St. Croix, Pierce, Pepin, Buffalo, Trempealeau, La Crosse, Vernon, Crawford, and Grant) resulted in the observation of more occupied eagle nests than were observed in 202. In 20, the most marked decrease in occupied bald eagle nests occurred in survey area (Appendix ; Ashland, Barron, Bayfield, Burnett, Douglas, Polk, Rusk, Sawyer, and Washburn counties), where there were 28 fewer occupied nests than in 202. Nest success was lower in the two northern survey areas (2-2%) than in the rest of the state (range = -00%; Table ). It is likely that the unusually late winter and cool spring experienced in northern Wisconsin in 20, with several large snow storms occurring into early May, may have caused increased nest abandonment or failure.

The Federal Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act provides protection for all eagle nests, nest trees, and adjacent habitat. Throughout the state project staff are commonly contacted by private landowners and public land managers for recommendations to protect bald eagle and osprey nests from disturbance. On public properties, habitat is managed to promote tall snags and large, super-canopy white pines for nest trees. Project staff make recommendations to protect nests where major disturbances such as timber sales, utility and telecommunication projects, housing development, and road construction were planned. From February, 20 to September 0, 20 project staff provided information on nest tree locations, management recommendations, and outreach for well over 0 different requests. In the past 2 years WDNR staff made management recommendations that protected over 80% of all known eagle and osprey nests. Accurate nest locations, nesting activity, and management guidance continue to be important factors in the long term conservation of Wisconsin s bald eagle and osprey populations. Wintering Eagles One survey for over-wintering bald eagles was flown on January 0, 20 on the lower Wisconsin River between the Petenwell Dam at Highway 82 and the Mississippi River at Highway 8/. A total of bald eagles (2 adults and immature) were observed. This was 2. times the number of bald eagles observed during the same survey completed in January 202. The 20-year average for this survey is 9 eagles, but the numbers recorded have varied widely from year to year based on the ice conditions on the river in January. Table. Summary of 20 bald eagle productivity surveys in Wisconsin. Survey Area (Appendix ) Occupied Territories Successful Territories* Total Young Young Per Occupied Territory Young Per Successful Territory Percent Nest Success** Area 92 20 0.82. 2 Area 2 2 2 0.8.2 2 Area 0 2.22. Area 8 2 8.00. Area 2 8 0.. Area 2 0.2. 8 Area 0.8.8 00 Total Territories, Territories with Known Outcome,8 8,0 0.89. *Successful territories included those where one or more young were present at the time of the productivity flight. **Percent nest success calculated only for those territories with known outcome.

MILWAUKEE WASHINGTON MARQUETTE TREMPEALEAU KEWAUNEE 8 BURNETT DOUGLAS 9 WASHBURN 2 2 2 LINCOLN 28 LANGLADE TAYLOR 0 20 CHIPPEWA DUNN 9 MARATHON CLARK EAU CLAIRE 2 9 2 PEPIN WOOD WAUPACA BAYFIELD SAWYER POLK BARRON RUSK ST CROIX PIERCE BUFFALO LA CROSSE VERNON CRAWFORD 8 9 9 9 JACKSON 0 GRANT ASHLAND MONROE 2 8 2 PRICE IRON RICHLAND IOWA 0 0 8 2 2 VILAS ONEIDA PORTAGE JUNEAU ADAMS WAUSHARA SAUK LAFAYETTE DANE GREEN COLUMBIA Occupied Bald Eagle Nests 20 Total =, ROCK GREEN LAKE 2 FOREST MENOMINEE FLORENCE OCONTO SHAWANO OUTAGAMIE WINNEBAGO FOND DU LAC DODGE JEFFERSON WALWORTH MARINETTE 2 CALUMET 2 WAUKESHA BROWN MANITOWOC SHEBOYGAN OZAUKEE KENOSHA RACINE 2 DOOR Figure. Occupied eagle nests where the observer recorded at least one of the following: a repaired nest, an incubating adult, eggs, or young in the nest.

9 9 9 9 9 98 99 980 98 982 98 98 98 98 98 988 989 990 99 992 99 99 99 99 99 998 999 2000 200 2002 200 200 200 200 200 2008 2009 200 20 202 20 08 0 9 0 88 20 98 29 2 2 29 2 8 Number of Territories 2 8 2 89 0 89 8 880 99 020 0 2 8 2 28 00 200 000 800 00 00 200 0 Year Figure 2. Occupied bald eagle nests in Wisconsin, 9-20. Bald eagle information for the years 9 to 989 was summarized from annual surveys completed by Charles Sindelar, Waukesha, WI.

Ospreys The first osprey flight was completed in May to locate occupied nests. There were occupied osprey nests found statewide in 20 (Figure ). This was an increase of pairs from 202 (Figure ), and the highest ever recorded in Wisconsin. Oneida county had the most occupied nests (n = 99), and ospreys nested in of the state s 2 counties (9%; Figure ). The number of occupied osprey nests increased throughout survey areas,,, and (Appendix ) but decreased in north-central and southeast Wisconsin (survey areas 2 and ; Appendix ). Funding constraints limited the extent of the second osprey nest survey to only Iron and Oneida counties, which was completed in mid-july to count young. The productivity of osprey pairs was determined in 20 (Table 2). This included an additional 20 nests in survey area 2 and 9 nests in survey area where productivity data was opportunistically collected in 8 counties. These pairs produced at least 2 young, averaging. young per successful nest, and % nest success (Table 2). Of the 92 successful nests, % had one young, % had two young, and % had three young. Osprey nest success was high in Iron County, with 89% of 9 nests successfully producing young at the time of the productivity flight. In Oneida County, the nest success rate was much lower, with % of 99 nests successfully producing young at the time of the productivity flight. Table 2. Summary of 20 osprey productivity surveys in Wisconsin. Survey Area (Appendix ) Occupied Territories Area 22 Successful Territories* Total Young Young Per Occupied Territory with Known Outcome Young Per Successful Territory Area 2 89 8 28 0.9. Area 20 Area 0 Area 9 Area 9.00. Area 8 Total Territories Territories with Known Outcome 92 2 0.9. *Successful territories included those where one or more young were present at the time of the productivity flight. Only two counties in Area 2, Iron and Oneida counties, were surveyed in their entirety for osprey productivity. No other aerial productivity surveys were conducted; additional productivity data was opportunistically collected.

MILWAUKEE WASHINGTON MARQUETTE TREMPEALEAU KEWAUNEE BURNETT 9 8 DOUGLAS WASHBURN 9 2 9 Occupied Osprey Nests - 20 Total = 9 99 LINCOLN LANGLADE TAYLOR 8 CHIPPEWA 2 8 MARATHON CLARK EAU CLAIRE BAYFIELD SAWYER POLK BARRON RUSK ST CROIX PIERCE DUNN PEPIN BUFFALO LA CROSSE VERNON CRAWFORD ASHLAND 2 0 JACKSON MONROE PRICE IRON RICHLAND WOOD 2 VILAS ONEIDA PORTAGE JUNEAU ADAMS WAUSHARA SAUK 2 FOREST WAUPACA MENOMINEE 2 FLORENCE OCONTO SHAWANO MARINETTE 8 2 9 2 COLUMBIA GREEN LAKE OUTAGAMIE WINNEBAGO FOND DU LAC DODGE CALUMET 9 BROWN DOOR MANITOWOC SHEBOYGAN OZAUKEE GRANT IOWA DANE JEFFERSON WAUKESHA LAFAYETTE GREEN ROCK 2 WALWORTH RACINE KENOSHA Figure. Occupied osprey nests where the observer recorded at least one of the following: one or more adults at a repaired nest, an incubating adult, eggs, or young in the nest.

92 82 8 0 2 2 8 8 202 228 2 2 2 00 0 9 90 0 8 0 8 8 9 8 0 80 8 09 2 22 0 00 200 00 00 00 00 9 9 9 9 9 98 99 980 98 982 98 98 98 98 98 988 989 990 99 992 99 99 99 99 99 998 999 2000 200 2002 200 200 200 200 200 2008 2009 200 20 202 20 Number of Territories Year Figure. Occupied osprey nests in Wisconsin, 9-20.

Appendix. Wisconsin Natural Heritage Inventory (NHI) eagle and osprey contact list. DNR Area Eagle/Osprey Survey Contacts For the latest and most complete information on the location of eagle and osprey nests (rev. /20) Area Ryan Magana, -- DNR, 80 Maple Street Spooner, WI 80 Ryan.Magana@wisconsin.gov Area 2 Ron Eckstein, --892 DNR, 0 Sutliff Ave Rhinelander, WI 0 Ronald.Eckstein@wisconsin.gov Eagle Carcass Submissions: Necropsy Required for: *Banded Eagles *Within mile of Great Lakes * LE cases *Suspicious die offs Repository: *Remaining Eagles go to The National Repository Area Steve Easterly, 920-0-2 2 E County Road Y, Suite 00 Oshkosh, WI 90 Stephen.Easterly@wisconsin.gov Area Erin Grossman, -2-8 DNR, 80 CTH F Bancroft, WI 92 Erin.Grossman@wisconsin.gov Area a Dean Edlin, 08-89- DNR, 0 Mormon Coulee Rd La Crosse, WI 0 Dean.Edlin@wisconsin.gov Area b Jim Woodford, --88 DNR, 0 Sutliff Ave Rhinelander, WI 0 James.Woodford@wisconsin.gov Area Dan Goltz, 08--2 DNR, 0 Hwy E Boscobel, WI 80 Daniel.Goltz@wisconsin.gov Area Seth Fisher, 22-88-0 DNR, N08 Co Hwy O Elkhorn, WI 2 Seth.Fisher@wisconsin.gov