Research on GNSS Interoperable Parameters

Similar documents
UNIT 1 - introduction to GPS

ESTIMATION OF IONOSPHERIC DELAY FOR SINGLE AND DUAL FREQUENCY GPS RECEIVERS: A COMPARISON

t =1 Transmitter #2 Figure 1-1 One Way Ranging Schematic

Global Positioning System: what it is and how we use it for measuring the earth s movement. May 5, 2009

Initial Assessment of BDS Zone Correction

SSR Technology for Scalable Real-Time GNSS Applications

Challenges and Solutions for GPS Receiver Test

The Global Positioning System

Broadcasting System Time Scales Offsets in Navigation Messages. Assessment of Feasibility

Galileo: The Added Value for Integrity in Harsh Environments

Global Navigation Satellite Systems II

Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS)Part I EE 570: Location and Navigation

Ionospheric Corrections for GNSS

Assessing & Mitigation of risks on railways operational scenarios

ANALYSIS OF GPS SATELLITE OBSERVABILITY OVER THE INDIAN SOUTHERN REGION

An Introduction to GPS

Modelling GPS Observables for Time Transfer

Enhancing space situational awareness using passive radar from space based emitters of opportunity

The Indian Regional Navigation. First Position Fix with IRNSS. Successful Proof-of-Concept Demonstration

The Benefit of Triple Frequency on Cycle Slip Detection

GNSS OBSERVABLES. João F. Galera Monico - UNESP Tuesday 12 Sep

EE 570: Location and Navigation

GPS (Introduction) References. Terms

FieldGenius Technical Notes GPS Terminology

GNSS Technologies. GNSS Acquisition Dr. Zahidul Bhuiyan Finnish Geospatial Research Institute, National Land Survey

International GNSS Monitoring & Assessment Service for OS (igmas) ICG September 2011, Tokyo, Japan

Satellite Navigation Integrity and integer ambiguity resolution

Real-time RTK messages for permanent reference station applications standardized by RTCM. Dr.-Ing. Hans-Juergen Euler Leica Research Fellow

Guochang Xu GPS. Theory, Algorithms and Applications. Second Edition. With 59 Figures. Sprin ger

Status of COMPASS/BeiDou Development

Study and analysis of Differential GNSS and Precise Point Positioning

Posicionamento por ponto com. Posicionamento por satélite UNESP PP 2017 Prof. Galera

Introduction to Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) Signal Structure

Time and frequency transfer methods based on GNSS. LIANG Kun, National Institute of Metrology(NIM), China

Integrity of Satellite Navigation in the Arctic

Fundamentals of GPS Navigation

Sources of Error in Satellite Navigation Positioning

Monitoring the Ionosphere and Neutral Atmosphere with GPS

ABSOLUTE CALIBRATION OF TIME RECEIVERS WITH DLR'S GPS/GALILEO HW SIMULATOR

Clock Synchronization of Pseudolite Using Time Transfer Technique Based on GPS Code Measurement

PRECISE RECEIVER CLOCK OFFSET ESTIMATIONS ACCORDING TO EACH GLOBAL NAVIGATION SATELLITE SYSTEMS (GNSS) TIMESCALES

Methodology and Case Studies of Signal-in-Space Error Calculation

Rec. ITU-R P RECOMMENDATION ITU-R P *

The Global Positioning System

GNSS: orbits, signals, and methods

3D-Map Aided Multipath Mitigation for Urban GNSS Positioning

Asia Oceania Regional Workshop on GNSS Precise Point Positioning Experiment by using QZSS LEX

Ionospheric Monitoring in China. Zhen Weimin, Ou Ming

GPS (Introduction) References. Terms

RTCM-SSR Strategy of Bias Treatment

Satellite Navigation Principle and performance of GPS receivers

GPS Milestones, cont. GPS Milestones. The Global Positioning Sytem, Part 1 10/10/2017. M. Helper, GEO 327G/386G, UT Austin 1. US GPS Facts of Note

Procedures for Quality Control of GNSS Surveying Results Based on Network RTK Corrections.

SC - Single carrier systems One carrier carries data stream

PPP with Ambiguity Resolution (AR) using RTCM-SSR

Enhancing global PPP with Local Ionospheric Corrections

Foreword by Glen Gibbons About this book Acknowledgments List of abbreviations and acronyms List of definitions

A Distribution Method of High Precise Differential Corrections for a Network Beidou/RTK System Based on Vehicular Networks

GPS and Recent Alternatives for Localisation. Dr. Thierry Peynot Australian Centre for Field Robotics The University of Sydney

Phase Center Calibration and Multipath Test Results of a Digital Beam-Steered Antenna Array

Global positioning system (GPS) - Part I -

Resection. We can measure direction in the real world! Lecture 10: Position Determination. Resection Example: Isola, Slovenia. Professor Keith Clarke

GPS for. Land Surveyors. Jan Van Sickle. Fourth Edition. CRC Press. Taylor & Francis Group. Taylor & Francis Croup, an Informa business

Chapter-15. Communication systems -1 mark Questions

GPS for crustal deformation studies. May 7, 2009

Methodology and Case Studies of Signal-in-Space Error Calculation Top-down Meets Bottom-up

Mobile Positioning in Wireless Mobile Networks

3GPP TS V ( )

COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS NCERT

Recommendation 16-A for Committee Decision

EUROPEAN GNSS (GALILEO) INITIAL SERVICES NAVIGATION SOLUTIONS POWERED BY E U R O P E OPEN SERVICE QUARTERLY PERFORMANCE REPORT

TEST YOUR SATELLITE NAVIGATION PERFORMANCE ON YOUR ANDROID DEVICE GLOSSARY

Effects of magnetic storms on GPS signals

Tajul Ariffin Musa. Tajul A. Musa. Dept. of Geomatics Eng, FKSG, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Skudai, Johor, MALAYSIA.

Global Positioning System (GPS) Positioning Errors During Ionospheric Scintillation Event. Keywords: GPS; scintillation; positioning error

RESOLUTION MSC.233(82) (adopted on 5 December 2006) ADOPTION OF THE PERFORMANCE STANDARDS FOR SHIPBORNE GALILEO RECEIVER EQUIPMENT

Introduction to GNSS

Real-Time and Multi-GNSS Key Projects of the International GNSS Service

BeiDou Next Generation Signal Design and Expected Performance

GPS: The Basics. Darrell R. Dean, Jr. Civil and Environmental Engineering West Virginia University. Expected Learning Outcomes for GPS

COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS-II (In continuation with Part-I)

CHAPTER 2 GPS GEODESY. Estelar. The science of geodesy is concerned with the earth by quantitatively

Understanding GPS: Principles and Applications Second Edition

Muhammad Ali Jinnah University, Islamabad Campus, Pakistan. Fading Channel. Base Station

COMBINED PERFORMANCES FOR OPEN GPS/GALILEO RECEIVERS

Intersatellites Channel Emulator

Where Next for GNSS?

magicgnss: QUALITY DATA, ALGORITHMS AND PRODUCTS FOR THE GNSS USER COMMUNITY

Introduction to GNSS

DYNAMIC POSITIONING CONFERENCE October 7-8, Sensors II. Redundancy in Dynamic Positioning Systems Based on Satellite Navigation

Antennas and Propagation. Chapter 5

Combined global models of the ionosphere

CH GPS/GLONASS/GALILEO/SBAS Signal Simulator. General specification Version 0.2 Eng. Preliminary

Mitigate Effects of Multipath Interference at GPS Using Separate Antennas

RECOMMENDATION ITU-R M *

Channel. Muhammad Ali Jinnah University, Islamabad Campus, Pakistan. Multi-Path Fading. Dr. Noor M Khan EE, MAJU

Clock Steering Using Frequency Estimates from Stand-alone GPS Receiver Carrier Phase Observations

Using GPS Receivers to Study the Upper Atmosphere

Global Correction Services for GNSS

Integration of GPS with a Rubidium Clock and a Barometer for Land Vehicle Navigation

Transcription:

The 7 th Meeting of International Committee on GNSS Research on GNSS Interoperable Parameters --Working Group A LU Xiaochun National Time Service Center Chinese Academy of Science Beijing, China, Nov. 7, 2012

Background Interoperability refers to the ability of global and regional navigation satellite systems and augmentations and the services to be used together to provide better capabilities at the user level than would be achieved by relying solely on the open signals of one system. Multi-GNSS is able to achieve interoperability. BUT, existence of differences among GNSSs cause inconvenience to users. 2

Background Thus, we need: Define the differences among GNSSs Study the parameters to represent these differences Process and transmit the parameters to users Make sure the users can depend on the parameters to improve services 3

Differences among GNSSs Differences among GNSSs: Constellation: Satellite number, Types of satellite orbit, ect. Signal: Modulation, Center frequency, Received power, ect. Message: Massage structure, Data content, Data format, etc. System time reference System coordinate reference These differences effect users on: Position,Navigation and Timing 4

Differences among GNSSs Positioning equation: 2 2 2 ( x x i) + ( y y i) + ( z z i) c v T = ρ ( ) ( ) c v a b i + δρi ion + δρi trop t the elements : can be obtained from signals or messages of different system; have different format and precision. % i Elements From Signal Differences From Message Format Precision Parameter From Signal Differences From Message Format Precision ( x, y, z ) i i i ( δρ ) i ion ρ% v i a t i 5

Differences Signal Ephemeris Onboard Clock Propagation Items User-Received Signal Level, Modulation Error, Correlation Characteristics, Phase Coherence, TGD Orbit offset, GNSS reference bias Clock offset, GNSS Time Bias Ionosphere GNSS interoperable parameters 6

GNSS Interoperability In order to provide better service for users: utilize specific method to monitor interoperable parameters; calculate parameters in a common time reference and coordinate reference frame; broadcast parameters to users; take parameters to eliminate adverse effect of the GNSS differences. 7

GNSS Interoperability Without interoperable parameters Wi Too many dates! Limited accuracy! 8

Divide these interoperable parameters into two sub-sets: Signal Parameters GNSS time bias GNSS coordina te bias User Received Signal Level TGD Modulat ion Ionos phere Correlati on Charact eristics interoperable parameter Set Clock offset Phase Coherence Orbit Message Parameters 9

Signal Parameters Provide users interoperable parameters in signal level: ability to chose a high quality signal in receiving process reduce the first positioning duration and decrease the complexity of receiver Too many signals! Receiver 10

User Received Signal Level Definition: The signal power when it arrives at the ground station. Detection: Use ground monitoring receiver to monitor the signal power and its variation range. Modulat ion Definition: The error which was produced in the modulation and transmission, including: phase modulation error and amplitude modulation error. Phase modulation error: Amplitude modulation error: The differences between the real phase in each channel and the ideal phase of the signal. The differences between the real amplitude in each branch and the ideal amplitude of the signal Detection : Compare the received signal to designed signal. 11

Correlati on Charact eristics Definition: Outputs of correlation peak amplitude and correlation curve characteristics after the operation of signal correlation. Correlation loss: Power difference between the actually received signal and the ideal signal in the designed bandwidth of the signal. Correlation curve: The curve obtained through correlation calculation between recovered ranging code and the ideal ranging code of all signals. Detection : The monitoring receiver acquire navigation signal, and then evaluate amplitude attenuation and curve distortion which is caused by wave distortion. 12

Correlati on Charact eristics (Continued) Calculation method: Correlation function: CCF( ε ) = T p T p 0 S () t S ( t ε ) dt BB PreProc Re f BB PreProc Re f 0 0 S BB-PrePeoc is the base-band signal been pretreated (down conversion, Doppler removal); reference signal S Ref is ideal base-band signal generated by local receiver; integral time T p is the main code period of reference signal. Relative loss: Power loss of available signal to all received signals : 2 ( S ( t) dt) ( S ( t) dt) P [ db] = max (20 log ( CCF( ε ))) CCF over allε 10 * T p 2 13

Phase Coherence Definition: The relative change of signal elements in the timeline. Code and carrier Coherence : Relative jitter value between ranging code and carrier wave in the same signal branch. Codes Coherence: Relative jitter value of time delay between ranging code and carrier wave; relative jitter value of ranging codes in different signal branch. Detection : Monitor the navigation signal. Calculation: Coherence between code and carrier & Coherence in ranging codes 14

Phase Coherence (Continued) Calculate method: Code and carrier Coherence: In interval of [t,t+t], use carrier wave limited in L j and L k as radiation of code carrier wave in L i frequency: CCD ( t, t + T) = PR ( t + T) PR ( t) [ CR ( t + T) CR ( t)] Li Lj, Lk Li Li Li Li 2 f L1 2 ILj, Lk( t, t T) fli Δ + I Lj,Lk (t,t+t) denotes the ionospheric delay differences in L 1 frequency on interval [t,t+t], these differences calculated from D-value of L j and L k frequency amplitude. If CCD Li Lj,Lk(t,t+T) neets: 100 T 7200, t 1 t t 2 -T, CCD Li Lj,Lk(t,t+T)>6.1 m Thus, code and carrier wave are consistence at t+t. 15

Phase Coherence Calculate method: Coherence in ranging codes: (Continued) Φ Φ Φ Φ ρ ρ λ ρ ρ λ ρ ρ ρ ρ, 2 j i, 2 i j i = i + i, = +, Δ = Δ 2 2 j j j 2 2 i j i, j λj λi λi λj ρ i, ρ j, ρ i, ρ j represent pseudo-range when exist ionospheric error and no ionospheric error respectively, j represent frequency which is different from i. Ф i and Ф j are observation value of carrier phase( the unit is distance), wavelength are λ i and λ j respectively; λ 2 i(ф j - Ф i )/(λ 2 j- λ 2 i) is amended value of dual-frequency ionosphere; ρ represent time delay between receiver channels. 16

Orbit Definition: GNSS precise orbit calculated based on same monitor station, same orbit determination algorithm, same space-time reference. Detection : Utilize observation value of multi-mode receiver and precise orbit algorithm to calculate GNSS precise orbit. Calculation: a) Detect the coarse error of observation value and cycle slip; b) Using the processed data to the precision of satellite orbit, station location and ERP parameter estimation; c) Obtained by compare to the correction information of broadcast ephemeris orbit. 17

Clock offset Definition: Calculate GNSS precise clock error based on same monitor station, same orbit determination algorithm, same space-time reference. Detection : Utilize Observation data of Laser, radio, dualfrequency carrier wave and precise clock error algorithm to get precise clock error of GNSS. 18

Clock offset (Continued) Calculation: a) Detect the coarse difference and cycle slip of the observation data; b) Take real-time precise satellite orbit, the position of observation station, and EPR parameters as known parameters to real-time precise satellite clock error processor; c) Use preprocessed real-time observation data by means of Square Root Filter to evaluate clock error; d) Compare the evaluated clock error with the broadcasted clock error, and then get amended clock error information. 19

Ionos phere Definition: Total electron content of global ionospheric grid based on the calculation of dual-frequency observations. Detection : By monitoring of ionospheric grid model. Calculation: a) nd max n % TEC( φ, λ) = P% (sin ϕ) A cos( mλ) + B% sin( mλ) n= 0 m= 0 Total electron content (TEC) in the path from monitoring station to satellite: 40.28 TEC P% P% = (1 ξ ) +Δ b +Δb k k k 1, i 2, i 2 i f1 b) Work out total electron content of global ionospheric grid by geomagnetic model: ( ) nm nm nm 20

GNSS time bias Definition: The time differences between each satellite navigation system and UTC. Detection : Monitor each system time and compare with UTC. Calculation: 1)Calculate the differences sys between each system time and UTC(K), sys =T sys -UTC(K); 2)Worked out the difference k between UTC(K) and UTC, k=utc(k)-utc; 3)Normalized each system time to UTC, = sys + k. 21

GNSS coordina te bias Definition : Differences between coordinate reference frame and ITRF. Detection : Measure the coordinate of given points in different coordinate reference frame, then calculate their difference Calculation : (X n, Y n, Z n ) T i: the coordinate of P n in frame i, (X n, Y n, Z n ) T ITRF: the coordinate of P n in ITRF; then (using Bursa model): 22

TGD Definition: GNSS signal group time delay Detection : Monitor and compare the signal time delay Calculation: TGD( f, f ) i j = PR( f) PRf ( ) i 1 ( f f ) i j 2 j Where, f i and f j are carrier wave frequency of two GNSS signals, PR(f i ) and PR(f j ) are the corresponded signal group time delay. 23

GNSS Interoperability Two forms can represent the parameters: The precision data point the assessment result. The tolerance data point the difference between the monitoring result and the assessment result. 24

Form of interoperable parameters Comparison of the two forms: Precision data Tolerance data Advantages Less computational complexity of user receiver Less computational complexity of the third monitoring station Low requirements of data rate Receive complete information in short time Can still use original GNSS to realize PVT when the parameters of the third party are unavailable Disadvantages Need high data rate Increased the time of receiving complete information The system will be useless when the parameters of the third party is unavailable Additional process at user receiver Increased the amount of computation in the third monitoring station 25

Broadcasting interoperable parameters Except the providers own links, interoperable parameters can be broadcasted to users in different ways. internet/mobile communication/commercial satellite User 26

Conclusion Other issues about GNSS interoperability: DOP amelioration of multi-gnss DOP saturation value Utilize existing or planned spare capacity in civil/open service navigation messages to increase multi-gnss interoperability Utilize existing or planned spare capacity SBAS navigation messages in order to increase multi-gnss interoperability Patent of MBOC signal Receive multi-system observation data Technology on receiving interoperable signal and receiver interoperable parameter model and algorithm taken by users Data type consistency and transferability The third frequency for interoperability Frequency diversity Definition, model and calculation of interoperable parameters Monitoring method in interoperable parameters (include system time difference monitoring) System time difference monitoring interoperable parameters broadcasting Correction model of ionosphere and atmospheric delay in multi-gnss Correction model of solar radiation pressure in multi-gnss Other methods to enhance interoperability 27

Conclusion WG-B and WG-D have paying more attention to overlaps between their work and in-depth interoperability research. A platform is required to attracts more academic, experts and industry specialists to research on interoperability and to provide better services for users. Overlaps between Interoperability & WG-B WG-B Interoperability WG-D Overlaps between Interoperability & WG-D 28

Conclusion Under this platform, we can discuss the following topics : Interoperable signal interoperable parameter Interoperability in user level Methods to enhance interoperability Interoperable algorithm 29

Prof. LU Xiaochun Luxc@ntsc.ac.cn 30