Inglewood Oil Field Specific Plan Project Public Information Meeting

Similar documents
Conceptual, Preliminary and Final Site Plan Review in Holladay City

Phase 2 Executive Summary: Pre-Project Review of AECL s Advanced CANDU Reactor ACR

City of San José, California CITY COUNCIL POLICY

Review of Oil and Gas Industry and the COGCC s Compliance with Colorado s Setback Rules

Counsel. Ph Fax

David J. Gellner, AICP, Principal Planner

Wireless Telecommunications Facilities Meeting. Neighborhood Leaders Meeting May 8, 2014

PLANNING DIVISION COMMUNITY & NEIGHBORHOODS DEPARTMENT

Public School Facilities Element

Halliburton and Baker Hughes Creating the leading oilfield services company

Modify Section , Major Impact Services and Utilities, of Chapter (Civic Use Types):

Riverside, California A Local Government CEQA Perspective

CHAPTER 3. Public Schools Facility Element

BEFORE THE OIL AND GAS CONSERVATION COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF COLORADO ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) APPLICATION

APPLICATION FOR PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) DEVELOPMENT PLAN

Applying for a Site Development Review (Sign CVCBD only)

Stephen M. Manning " David L. Willis " Larry Davis " A. Andrew Gallo Amoco Production Company Bruce B. Rowley " PROCEDURAL HISTORY

City of Hamilton INFORMATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT

THE USE OF A SAFETY CASE APPROACH TO SUPPORT DECISION MAKING IN DESIGN

CHAPTER 11 PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN APPROVAL PROCESS

COUNTY OF CLEVELAND, NORTH CAROLINA AGENDA FOR THE PLANNING BOARD MEETING. July 31, :00 PM. Commissioners Chamber

Paul Yale. Partner. Experience. Paul Yale 1300 Post Oak Blvd. Suite 2000 Houston, TX

VINTAGE ORIGINAL ART MURAL REGISTRATION PROCESS

Summerland Planning Advisory Committee. SunPAC Meeting #31 April 28, 2011

February 4, 2004 PROPOSAL FOR DECISION PROCEDURAL HISTORY. Mark Helmueller, Hearings Examiner

[LLOR L DP0000.LXSSH X.HAG ] Notice of Availability of the Draft Resource Management Plan/Environmental

Dr. William Whitsitt President Domestic Petroleum Council. Advances in Technology: Innovations in the Domestic Energy and Mineral Sector

MEETING TYPE: Board of Commissioners - Regular. MEETING DATE: 10 Jan STAFF RESPONSIBLE: Tim Jones. DEPARTMENT: Planning & Zoning Division

View referenced exhibit back-up material. (See Report to the City Council No ) Adoption of a Resolution certifying findings that:

The Coles Hill Uranium Project and Virginia Uranium Inc.- History and Critical Path Forward for Development

CONVEYANCE PIPELINE AND PUMP STATION

Sec Radio, television, satellite dish and communications antennas and towers.

SDSU NEW STUDENT HOUSING PROJECT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT Final EIR Comments and Responses

DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR WIRELESS FACILITIES IN THE PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY

BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF DESCHUTES COUNTY, OREGON * * * *

Truckee Fire Protection District Board of Directors

Applying for a Site Development Review

SBA Expands and Clarifies Ability of SBICs to Finance in Passive Businesses

REPLY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY (U 338-E) TO PROTESTS AND REQUESTS FOR HEARINGS

FREMONT COUNTY. APPLICATION FOR ZONE CHANGE #2 USE DESIGNATION PLAN (Requires Subsequent Approval of ZC #2 Final Designation Plan) 1.

LARAMIE COUNTY PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT OFFICE 3966 Archer Pkwy Cheyenne, WY Phone (307) Fax (307)

Small Cell Infrastructure in Denver

UNPLATTED SUBDIVISION APPLICATION PACKAGE SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) )

DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA ITEM

Industry Response - Post Macondo

Details of the Proposal

Final Environmental Impact Report

BLM S LAND USE PLANNING PROCESS AND PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT OPPORTUNITIES STEP-BY-STEP

BEFORE THE STATE OIL AND GAS BOARD OF MISSISSIPPI

a. Experience in providing services to school districts and other governmental

Community & Economic Development Department Planning Division Frederick Street PO Box 8805 Moreno Valley, CA SUBMITAL REQUIREMENTS

IEEE Session #14 Opening Plenary Presentation

AN OVERVIEW OF THE AGA GAS QUALITY MANAGEMENT MANUAL. Terrence A. Grimley

SHTG primary submission process

EXPLORATION DEVELOPMENT OPERATION CLOSURE

GEORGE M. JANES & ASSOCIATES. September 4, Ted Fink Greenplan 302 Pells Rd. Rhinebeck, NY 12572

PRELIMINARY PLAT / CONSTRUCTION PLAN APPLICATION SUBMITTAL PACKAGE REQUIREMENTS

051215ZB.txt 2 STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF WESTCHESTER 3 TOWN OF EASTCHESTER... X X

Supervision of Outside Business Activities (OBAs) and Private Securities Transactions Wednesday, November 9 3:30 p.m. 4:30 p.m.

APPLICATION DESIGN REVIEW Please Print or Type

WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS ORDINANCE. This Ordinance shall be known as The Wireless Telecommunications Ordinance of Polk County, North Carolina.

C. CEQA Determination: Categorically exempt pursuant to Section of the CEQA Guidelines ( Existing Facilities ).

Minutes from the Health and Well-Being Board Financial Planning Group Tuesday 15 December North London Business Park, F13 1pm 3pm

California State University, Northridge Policy Statement on Inventions and Patents

PROCEDURAL HISTORY. Application Filed: July 29, Notice of Hearing: September 6, Hearing Held: September 27, 1996

Baker River Project License Implementation. Cultural Resource Advisory Group. FINAL Meeting Notes

Item No. 16 Town of Atherton

Telecommunications. A Presentation to the Georgia Planning Association. David C. Kirk, AICP Troutman Sanders LLP

Upstream Permitting in Colorado UIC Permitting, Drilling Permitting and Air Permitting

[LLNV L ER A; ; MO# ] Notice of Availability of the Record of Decision and Final Supplemental

cm or SONOMA RESOLUTION NO

LICENSING THE PALLAS-REACTOR USING THE CONCEPTUAL SAFETY DOCUMENT

SAUDI ARABIAN STANDARDS ORGANIZATION (SASO) TECHNICAL DIRECTIVE PART ONE: STANDARDIZATION AND RELATED ACTIVITIES GENERAL VOCABULARY

Closing Argument. on the proposed Gahcho Kue Diamond Mine. Submitted to the Review Panel for EIR [2006]

(4) The location and design of schools so that they serve as community and neighborhood focal points; and

British Columbia s Environmental Assessment Process

Hillside & Foothills Development Application

Repsol E&P T&T Ltd is one of the upstream Repsol YPF Group of companies currently operating in more than 20 countries around the world.

CITY OF LOS ANGELES CALIFORNIA

PLANNED SIGN PROGRAM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS

MSFA Releases Due Diligence Findings on Vikings Owners Finances MSFA Releases required and additional due diligence

PLANNING BOARD CITY OF BAYONNE MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING MARCH 10, 2015

Eastern Goleta Valley Community Plan More Mesa

Wireless Facility Radio Frequency Exposure Compliance Review

MINUTES. Charles Farris was absent from the meeting. Also present was Rodger Lentz, Janet Holland of Development Services and two interested citizens.

A Summary Report of a 2015 Survey of the Politics of Oil and Gas Development Using Hydraulic Fracturing in Colorado

THE AMERICA INVENTS ACT NEW POST-ISSUANCE PATENT OFFICE PROCEEDINGS

East Anglia TWO and East Anglia ONE North. Summary and Approach to Site Selection

WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS ORDINANCE. This Ordinance shall be known as The Wireless Telecommunications Ordinance of Polk County, North Carolina.

CITY OF LOS ANGELES CALIFORNIA ERIC GARCETTI MAYOR

Public Art Mural Packet

The following draft Agreement supplements, but does not replace, the MOU by and between the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) and the California

Controlling Changes Lessons Learned from Waste Management Facilities 8

Southern Shrimp Alliance, Inc P.O. Box 1577 Tarpon Springs, FL Ph Fx

Guidance for Industry

PRESENT: Directors Bill Paskle, Chair; Tony Ray; Ali Zolfaghari; Manuel Rodriguez; Tony Rouhotas; Brett VanWey; Stephen Rea.

Oakland County Michigan Register of Deeds Plat Engineering, GIS, & Remonumentation Dept. Ph: (248) Fax (248)

RECOMMENDED PRACTICE FOR DAMAGE PREVENTION PROGRAMS

BEFORE THE OIL AND GAS CONSERVATION COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF COLORADO ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) AMENDED APPLICATION

Transcription:

Public Information Meeting Wednesday, February 21, 2018 6:30 to 8:00 PM Culver City Veterans Memorial Auditorium 4117 Overland Avenue

Public Information Meeting Agenda Inglewood Oil Field Specific Plan Project 1. Welcome and Introductions 2. Purpose and Format of this Public Meeting 3. Why the City Initiated the IOF Specific Plan Project 4. What the IOF Specific Plan Project Would Allow 5. How to Participate and Provide Input

Introductions City of Culver City/Subcommittee Goran Eriksson, Council Member Meghan Sahli Wells, Council Member Carol A. Schwab, City Attorney Heather Baker, Assistant City Attorney Contract Project Manager City of Culver City Melanie Doran Traxler, AICP Psomas Environmental Consultant Kristin Starbird, Sr. Project Manager/Vice President

Opening Remarks Council Member Eriksson Council Member Sahli Wells

Purpose of this Public Meeting Information Sharing Proposed Project has been subject of public interest City is committed to informing the community about important projects Facilitate Understanding of the Project Background of events provides context for the proposed Project Provide overview of the Drilling Regulations and Specific Plan Facilitate Understanding of the Public Review Process Encourage interested parties to provide written comments on the Draft EIR and Specific Plan Discuss opportunities to provide input

Format of this Public Meeting Brief Informational Presentation Why the Project has been proposed What the Project entails and what type of oil related activities are anticipated How the public review process works and how to provide substantive input Question & Answer 15 minutes of Q&A following each presentation segment This is not a public hearing and public testimony is not being recorded Supplemental Information Informational handouts provide summary explanations about the Project and the public input process Culver City website: www.culvercity.org/inglewoodoilfield

WHY? Why the City Initiated the IOF Specific Plan Project

The Inglewood Oil Field (IOF) Overview Inglewood Oil Field Specific Plan Project An oil reservoir that is defined by various surface, subsurface, ownership and rights boundaries o Surface Field boundary is the visible working area at the ground surface Overall, the IOF (surface field) is approximately 1,000 acres o o 90% of the IOF is within unincorporated Los Angeles County (the County IOF) 10% of the IOF is within Culver City (the City IOF) The County IOF is regulated by the County s Baldwin Hills Community Standards District (CSD)

The Inglewood Oil Field (IOF) Context and Boundaries City IOF Area Surface Field Boundary

The City IOF Existing Oil Operations Inglewood Oil Field Specific Plan Project The City IOF has been used for oil drilling and production since the 1920 s 69 total wells are documented to have been drilled within the City IOF o o At least 28 of those wells have been abandoned 41 wells are existing active or potentially active wells Sentinel Peak Resources (SPR) is the Oil Field Operator as of January 1, 2017

City IOF Existing Wells and Conditions Inglewood Oil Field Specific Plan Project

The IOF Regulatory Process Recent Events Inglewood Oil Field Specific Plan Project 2005/06 Accidental gas release and odor event focused interest on the IOF 2006 Los Angeles County regulatory (environmental) review process was initiated o o Previous Oil Field Operator PXP filed application Culver City had initial participation with County process but withdrew over differing opinions (Culver City subsequently litigated and specific performance is set forth in the Settlement Agreement) 2008 County Board of Supervisors adopted Baldwin Hills Community Standards District (CSD), which is supplemented by the terms of the Settlement Agreement 2012 Culver City initiated process to update/enhance City procedures for regulating oil and gas drilling and production activities

The IOF Regulatory Process Recent Events (continued) 2013 Culver City released Discussion Draft Oil Drilling Regulations o o o Modeled after County CSD regulations Continuation of drilling and oil production (non conforming use) County is 20-year program; Culver City is 15-year program o Culver City proposes 30 new wells, which is pro-rated based on 500 wells allowed under County CSD program o County setback is 400 feet; Culver City proposes 400 feet (but has a stricter definition of developed area as the baseline) 2017 City IOF Specific Plan and Draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR) prepared and released for public review

WHY? Questions & Answers (15 minutes)

WHAT? What the IOF Specific Plan Project Would Allow

What is the City IOF Specific Plan Project?

The Inglewood Oil Field (IOF) City IOF Area Inglewood Oil Field Specific Plan Project

The City IOF Specific Plan Project Area Inglewood Oil Field Specific Plan Project + 80 acres The Specific Plan area consists of four non-contiguous areas Surrounding Area: o City Park and Open Space along the north, west and east o Abuts Blair Hills neighborhood at the north east o County IOF extends to the south Plan Areas 2 and 3 are located within the Culver City Park

City IOF Planning Areas Inglewood Oil Field Specific Plan Project

The Inglewood Oil Field (IOF) City IOF Area

The City IOF Potential Future Oil Operations Inglewood Oil Field Specific Plan Project The existing conditions (41 active/potentially active) wells would be allowed to continue Up to 30 new wells could be drilled under the City IOF Project Drilling of new wells would be limited to a period of 15 years Only 2 or 3 wells could be drilled per year Placement of any new wells would generally be limited to within the allowed drilling area Continued and new oil production operations would be regulated, permitted and monitored in accordance with the City IOF Specific Plan (and Drilling Regulations)

City IOF Specific Plan Allowed Drilling Areas Inglewood Oil Field Specific Plan Project

Would hydraulic fracturing (or fracking )) or other well stimulation techniques be allowed if the Specific Plan is approved?

Status of Fracking The Draft EIR includes evaluation of environmental impacts if hydraulic fracturing were to be allowed, and concludes that a significant unavoidable seismic related impact could result The Draft EIR includes evaluation of an Alternative to the Project under which hydraulic fracturing would be prohibited, and concludes that significant unavoidable seismic related impacts would be eliminated through prohibition of hydraulic fracturing (and similar high pressure well stimulation) activities The Draft Specific Plan reserves the possibility for hyrdraulic fracturing and similar high energy well stimulation treatments Section 32 of the Draft Drilling Regulations serves as a placeholder for City Council to provide specific direction on well stimulation treatments Historically, hydraulic fracturing has limited application in the IOF and is presumed to be unlikely

How is the IOF Specific Plan Different than the City s s Current Regulations?

Differences Between Current and Proposed Regulations Current oil drilling regulations set forth in CCMC Chapter 11.12 Change in how oil related activities would be reviewed, permitted and monitored by Culver City Require a comprehensive and coordinated approach to management of oil and gas activities with a focus on minimizing adverse environmental concerns Emphasis on safety, improved emergency preparedness and emergency response Target overall consolidation of oil facilities over time (requiring unused facilities to be removed and new facilities placed within a smaller physical footprint) Includes measures to improve and enhance the physical interface between oil uses and other community uses

How will the City IOF Specific Plan Work?

Purpose When adopted, the City IOF Specific Plan will define oil uses as a continuing legal non-conforming use within the City IOF, which will be regulated by the City IOF Specific Plan and its related Drilling Regulations

Proposed Drilling Regulations The Drilling Regulations set forth the process and procedures for Oil Operations The Drilling Regulations establish a 3 tier permitting process, requiring: (1) A Comprehensive Drilling Plan (for Approval by City Council) (2) An Annual Consolidation and Drilling Plan (for Approval by the Community Development Director) (3) Individual Drilling Use Permits (issued by the Community Development Director) The Drilling Regulations establish a comprehensive program for periodic review, reporting and monitoring

Proposed Development Plan Concepts Inglewood Oil Field Specific Plan Project The Development Plan Concepts (Chapter 3) focus on a policy program that is consistent with the City s General Plan The Concept Plans establish expectations for coordination with open space planning, visual enhancements and viewshed protection, compatibility with surrounding land uses and safety planning

Implementation and Administration Inglewood Oil Field Specific Plan Project Chapter 5 of the Specific Plan provides a program for how the City IOF Specific Plan will be implemented and administered Any substantial changes to Development Concepts or Drilling Regulations require approval from the City Council The City IOF program will be periodically reviewed to determine if adjustments are needed to ensure that the Objectives are being met

WHAT? Questions & Answers (15 minutes)

HOW? How to Participate and Provide Input

To submit written comments, include Subject: Inglewood Oil Field Specific Plan Project Via Email: IOFSpecificPlanProject@culvercity.org Via Fax: (310) 253 5664 Via Mail: City Attorney s Office City of Culver City 9770 Culver Boulevard Culver City, CA 90232 Attention: Heather Baker, Assistant City Attorney Specific Plan and Draft EIR can be viewed or downloaded at www.culvercity.org/inglewoodoilfield City of Culver City Planning Division Julian Dixon Library

Meetings and Opportunities for Public Input

Opportunities for Input Through CEQA Process Public Review of EIR Inglewood Oil Field Specific Plan Project Friday, September 15, 2017 through Wednesday, March 14, 2018 Final EIR Written comments submitted Draft EIR and any corrections/additions, if required Responses prepared to written comments received on the Draft EIR City Council Public Hearing Public Testimony taken at public hearings (anticipated Fall 2018) Approval of Project or Alternative; modify Project; or deny Project Notice of Determination NOD filed within 5 days of approval starts 30 day statute of limitations on court challenges under CEQA

California Environmental Quality Act Inglewood Oil Field Specific Plan Project 1. Inform decision makers and public about potentially significant environmental effects; 2. Identify ways to avoid or significantly reduce environmental impacts; 3. Prevent significant avoidable impacts through feasible alternatives and/or mitigation; and 4. If a project is approved with significant impacts, disclose to the public the reasons why.

What kind of comments should I provide?

Commenting on the EIR Comments should focus on the content and sufficiency of the Draft EIR Comments should be specific, with reference to specific sections or pages (when possible) Comments should be constructive and related to the clarification or correction of information presented in the EIR Comments may suggest specific additional alternatives or mitigation measures Comments that challenge conclusions or methodologies in the EIR should be supported by substantial evidence

What is substantial evidence?

Providing Substantial Evidence with Comments Inglewood Oil Field Specific Plan Project DO: Include facts, reasonable assumptions based on facts, and/or expert opinion based on facts Explain the basis for the comment, and if appropriate, submit data or references that offer facts to support the comment When submitting data or references, provide complete information about the source of information so that it can located and reviewed DON T: Include unsubstantiated opinions, speculative arguments or erroneous information Provide generalized statements that are not relevant to the specific details of the proposed Project or the EIR

Tips for Providing Effective Comments Inglewood Oil Field Specific Plan Project Example of what to include in EIR comments: On page XYZ of the Draft EIR, the topic of XYZ requires additional analysis or made an error in assumptions or did not discuss the impacts correctly, etc. Studies/research provided here provides substantiation for this assertion Example of what to include in Specific Plan comments: On page XYZ of the Specific Plan, Section XYZ is not consistent with these policies ABC of the General Plan or does not fully explain how the project will be implemented and monitored, etc.

Providing Input on the City IOF Specific Plan or Project Description

Comment on the Proposed City IOF Specific Plan Written Comments of the Specific Plan by March 14 th Written Comments on the Draft EIR by March 14 th Public Testimony at future Public Hearings

HOW? Questions & Answers (15 minutes)

Thank you for coming!