Practical Considerations for Radiated Immunities Measurement using ETS-Lindgren EMC Probes

Similar documents
Selecting the right antenna for the

9. Microwaves. 9.1 Introduction. Safety consideration

4GHz / 6GHz Radiation Measurement System

8GHz RF EMF Strength Meter

A Complete Simulation of a Radiated Emission Test according to IEC

THE ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD THEORY. Dr. A. Bhattacharya

E-Field Uniformity Test Volume In Gtem Cell Based On Labview

Technical Note 2. Standards-compliant test of non-ionizing electromagnetic radiation on radar equipment

Accredited calibration of field strength meters

Large E Field Generators in Semi-anechoic Chambers for Full Vehicle Immunity Testing

Novel Probes and Evaluation Procedures to Assess Field Magnitude and Polarization

Verifying Simulation Results with Measurements. Scott Piper General Motors

Polarization. Contents. Polarization. Types of Polarization

Semi Anechoic Chamber (SAC)

KULLIYYAH OF ENGINEERING

A GTEM BEST PRACTICE GUIDE APPLYING IEC TO THE USE OF GTEM CELLS

Sensor and Simulation Notes Note 548 October 2009

GTEM cells. Emissions and immunity testing in a single, shielded environment

Alternative Radiated Emission Test Methods Progress Achieved in IND60 Project

Performance Analysis of Different Ultra Wideband Planar Monopole Antennas as EMI sensors

Measurement Good Practice Guide

FISCHER CUSTOM COMMUNICATIONS, INC.

Technology in Balance

Model 3140B BiConiLog Antenna User Manual

EQUIPMENT AND METHODS FOR WAVEGUIDE POWER MEASUREMENT IN MICROWAVE HEATING APPLICATIONS

Characteristics of Biconical Antennas Used for EMC Measurements

C E R T I F I C A T E OF C A L I B R A T I O N

Experiment 19. Microwave Optics 1

Correlation Between Measured and Simulated Parameters of a Proposed Transfer Standard

US Council of EMC Laboratories [USCEL] Technical Issues having Significant Cost Implications for EMC Laboratory Owners/Operators

Physics 4C Chabot College Scott Hildreth

Description RF Explorer RFEAH-25 1 is a 25mm diameter, high performance near field H-Loop antenna.

Trees, vegetation, buildings etc.

Waveguides. Metal Waveguides. Dielectric Waveguides

Electromagnetic Compatibility ( EMC )

ECSE 352: Electromagnetic Waves

Ave output power ANT 1(dBm) Ave output power ANT 2 (dbm)

Saturation of Active Loop Antennas

EMC/EMI MEASURING INSTRUMENTS & ACCESSORIES SHORT-FORM CATALOG 2009

Absorbers and Anechoic Chamber Measurements

Ultra-wideband antennas. S. Sczyslo, G. Armbrecht, H. Thye, S. Dortmund and T. Kaiser

TEST REPORT... 1 CONTENT...

Antenna Fundamentals Basics antenna theory and concepts

Internal Model of X2Y Chip Technology

Report Of. Shielding Effectiveness Test For. DefenderShield. Test Date(s): September 1 October 2, 2012

SCATTERING POLARIMETRY PART 1. Dr. A. Bhattacharya (Slide courtesy Prof. E. Pottier and Prof. L. Ferro-Famil)

Double-Ridged Waveguide Horn

Microwave Circuit Design and Measurements Lab. INTRODUCTION TO MICROWAVE MEASUREMENTS: DETECTION OF RF POWER AND STANDING WAVES Lab #2

Harmonizing the ANSI-C12.1(2008) EMC Tests. Harmonizing the ANSI-C12.1(2008) EMC Tests

SCOPE OF ACCREDITATION TO ISO/IEC 17025:2005 & ANSI/NCSL Z

Absorbers and Anechoic Chamber Measurements

Model BiConiLog Antenna. User Manual

EMC/EMI MEASURING INSTRUMENTS & ACCESSORIES SHORT-FORM CATALOG 2011

Characterization of medical devices electromagnetic immunity to environmental RF fields.

OPEN TEM CELLS FOR EMC PRE-COMPLIANCE TESTING

Research Article Isotropic Broadband E-Field Probe

EN61326 EMC COMPLIANCE REPORT on the LP Series Ultrasonic Transmitter Remote Amplifier and Transducer for Hawk Measurement Systems Pty Ltd

EMG4066:Antennas and Propagation Exp 1:ANTENNAS MMU:FOE. To study the radiation pattern characteristics of various types of antennas.

APPLICATION OF SWEPT FREQUENCY MEASUREMENTS TO THE EMBEDDED MODULATED SCATTERER TECHNIQUE

Power Sensors Ltd. PQube 3 AC Analyzer IEC Class 0,2 S Accuracy Compliance Report

Mhow (MP) PIN c/o 56 APO RFI : PROCUREMENT OF FAST TRANSIENT RESPONSE ELECTROMAGNETIC PULSE (EMP) SIMULATOR

How will the third edition of IEC affect your test facility?

Chapter 2. Fundamental Properties of Antennas. ECE 5318/6352 Antenna Engineering Dr. Stuart Long

Intermodulation Distortion and Compression Point Measurement of Active Integrated Antennas Using a Radiative Method

Application Note #60 Harmonic Measurement for IEC And other Radiated Immunity Standards

Numerical Calibration of Standard Gain Horns and OEWG Probes

(i) Determine the admittance parameters of the network of Fig 1 (f) and draw its - equivalent circuit.

7. Experiment K: Wave Propagation

Microwave Optics. Department of Physics & Astronomy Texas Christian University, Fort Worth, TX. January 16, 2014

R&S NRPM Over-the-Air (OTA) Power Measurement Solution For 5G, WLAN IEEE ad and IEEE ay

Physically and Electrically Large Antennas for Antenna Pattern Measurements and Radar Cross Section Measurements in the Upper VHF and UHF bands

GAIN COMPARISON MEASUREMENTS IN SPHERICAL NEAR-FIELD SCANNING

Part 1: Standing Waves - Measuring Wavelengths

Antenna Parameters. Ranga Rodrigo. University of Moratuwa. December 15, 2008

OPEN TEM CELLS FOR EMC PRE-COMPLIANCE TESTING

The Measurement and Uncertainty Analysis of Antenna Factor of Microwave Antennas Based on Standard Site Method

UNIVERSITI MALAYSIA PERLIS

EMC TEST REPORT For MPP SOLAR INC Inverter/ Charger Model Number : PIP 4048HS

EMC Test Facility Sale

Archived 3/18/10 USER MANUAL EMCO MODEL 3141 BICONILOG TM LOG-PERIODIC / T BOW-TIE ANTENNA Rev A 01/97

Conservation of energy during the reflection and transmission of microwaves

EMC TEST REPORT. Report No. : EM/2004/10096 Page : 1 of 19

EN :2007+A1:2011 Electromagnetic compatibility Emission standard for residential, commercial and light-industrial environments

Techniques to reduce electromagnetic noise produced by wired electronic devices

Normalized Site Attenuation Test Report

REVERBERATION CHAMBER FOR EMI TESTING

High frequency electomagnetic field irradiation. Andrea Contin

NIR MEASUREMENTS. Principles and practices of EMF characterization and measurements

A Dual-Polarized MIMO Antenna with EBG for 5.8 GHz WLAN Application

You will need the following pieces of equipment to complete this experiment: Wilkinson power divider (3-port board with oval-shaped trace on it)

CHAPTER 2 MICROSTRIP REFLECTARRAY ANTENNA AND PERFORMANCE EVALUATION

Harmonic Current emission EN :2014 Class A Pass. Voltage Fluctuation and Flicker EN :2013 Clause 5 Pass

The shunt capacitor is the critical element

MICROWAVE MICROWAVE TRAINING BENCH COMPONENT SPECIFICATIONS:

Microwave and optical systems Introduction p. 1 Characteristics of waves p. 1 The electromagnetic spectrum p. 3 History and uses of microwaves and

Comparison of IC Conducted Emission Measurement Methods

Discontinuous Disturbance (Click) EN :2006+A1:2009+A2:2011 Clause N/A** Radiated Emission, 30MHz to 1000MHz

10 Mb/s Single Twisted Pair Ethernet Conducted Immunity Steffen Graber Pepperl+Fuchs

Test and Measurement for EMC

Shielding Effectiveness Summary Results for RadiaShield Technologies, Inc. RadiaShield Fabric

Transcription:

Practical Considerations for Radiated Immunities Measurement using ETS-Lindgren EMC Probes Detectors/Modulated Field ETS-Lindgren EMC probes (HI-6022/6122, HI-6005/6105, and HI-6053/6153) use diode detectors for rectifying electromagnetic fields. The probes are calibrated to report continuous wave (CW) root-mean-square (RMS) electric fields. For electric fields with modulations or complex field with multiple frequency components, these probes may not accurately report the instantaneous field values or the true power of the field. For commercial EMC measurements, such as fields with 1 khz 80% AM as required in IEC 61000-4-3 (EN 61000-4-3), the field readings should be taken with the modulation off (CW or sine wave only). Please see the related standards for details. Probe Orientation ETS-Lindgren EMC probes, such as HI-6022/6122, HI-6005/6105, and HI-6053/6153, are designed with three orthogonal sensing elements. Ideally, the probes will be entirely isotropic, i.e. sensing electric field equally in any directions. Because of interferences from the probe construction and other non-ideal factors, certain non-isotropic behaviors exist. These non-ideal behaviors, however, can be minimized if the end user can take certain precautions. The effect can be mitigated further by mimicking their calibration geometry in their applications. Note that calibrations for all three axes are still required. This is different from calibrating the probe only in one orientation, and producing a composite correction factor (for all three axes) based on the calibration taken in this specific setup. The composite correction method produces incorrect calibration data, as the traceable calibrated field is only valid for the intended polarization (See IEEE 1309 on methods to generate traceable electric field). The composite correction factors are not traceable to national standards. Instead, during the calibration at ETS-Lindgren, all three axes are individually aligned (and electrically peaked) to the NIST traceable incident electric field. Correction factors are reported for each axis. The users are expected to correct the final readings based on: E = ( CF E ) + ( CF E ) + ( CF E ) 2 2 2 x x y y z z Where E is the electric field after correction, E x, y, z CF x, y, z are the magnitudes of the E field readings in x, y or z direction, are the calibration factors provided by the calibration labs. In a typical radiated immunities application, it is best to align the probe similarly to its calibration geometry. This typically means that one axis is dominant, and reads a much higher field value than the other two. The correction factors should still be applied to x, y and z axes separately, and total field summed after the corrections based on the above equation. For HI-6005/6105/6022/6122, the calibration geometry at ETS is as following: X-axis: x aligned with the polarization of the antenna; y pointed towards the transmit antenna; and z is cross polarized (in the H-field direction). See Figure 1 for illustration. Y-axis: y aligned with the polarization of the antenna; z pointed towards the transmit antenna; and x is cross polarized (in the H-field direction).

Z-axis: z aligned with the polarization of the antenna; x pointed towards the transmit antenna; and y is cross polarized (in the H-field direction). See Figure 2 for illustration. For HI-6053/6153, it can be difficult to hold them at the orthogonal angle (see Figure 3) without a special fixture. Also, the axes of these probes are hidden under protective covers. It is not always obvious how the probe elements are positioned. Because of the superior isotropic response of the HI-6053/6153 probes (better than 1 db), it is typically not necessary to orient these two types of probes the same way as the calibration setup. For references, the calibration geometry at ETS is listed below (Probe stalk is at the orthogonal angle, i.e.54.7 from the vertical plane). X-axis: x aligned with the polarization of the antenna; y is longitudinal (in the propagation direction); and z is cross-polarized (in the H-field direction). See figures 3 and 4 for illustration. Y-axis: y aligned with the polarization of the antenna; z is longitudinal (in the propagation direction); and x is cross-polarized (in the H-field direction). See figures 3 and 4 for illustration. Z-axis: z aligned with the polarization of the antenna; x is longitudinal (in the propagation direction); and y is cross-polarized (in the H-field direction). See figures 3 and 4 for illustration. It is important to keep the probe electronics box away from the incident electromagnetic wave. It is recommended the stalk of the probe be parallel to the E or H-field (Figure 4) to minimize any influences from the electronics box. Figure 4 shows a typical recommended setup for this type of probes during a measurement. In this setup, the electronics box is the farthest from the main beam of the antenna. The decision to align with E or H field depends on the characteristics of the transmitting antenna. If the transmitting antenna has a narrower beam width in H direction, the probe stalk should be in H field direction as well. Another technique one might consider is to use microwave absorbers around the electronics box to minimize the reflections. Note that it is generally not a good practice to align the stalk in the field propagation direction (parallel to the Poynting vector). This is because the metallic electronics box will either block or reflect the field to the sensing elements. Setup shown in Figure 5 is not recommended, as the measurement results (Figure 6) are compromised by the interference from the supporting structures.

Figure 1. Measuring horizontally polarized E field: x axis aligned with the incident electric field. S denotes Poynting vector. Figure 2. Measuring vertically polarized E field: z axis aligned with the incident electric field. S denotes Poynting vector.

Figure 3. Orthogonal orientation of a stalk probe during calibration probe stalk is 45 to the side, and 54.7 from the vertical line. S denotes Poynting vector. Figure 4. Recommended orientation for HI-6053/6153 stalk probes during measurements. Probe stalk is parallel to the H field, which minimizes any field pickups from the high-impedance lines inside the stalk. S denotes Poynting vector.

Figure 5 a). The electronics box interferes with the sensor (head on position). Figure 5 b). A handle behind an HI-6005 probe, even made of dielectric material, can interfere with the measurement. Do not orient a probe which can interfere with the measurements.

HI-4433-GRE Frequency Response 2 1 Y axis aligned (orthogonal orientation) head on 0 db -1-2 -3-4 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 frequency (GHz) Figure 6. The frequency response of an HI-4433-GRE probe. The head on position as shown in Figure 5a shows large oscillations in frequency response data because of reflections of the electronic box. Data from an orthogonal orientation as shown in Figure 3 does not show such large oscillations. Selecting the Best Probes for the Application For radiated immunities applications from 10 MHz - 40 GHz, especially in an open air environment, it is recommended to select HI-6053/6153 probes. These probes provide the best isotropic response in this frequency range (provided with probe electronics positioned away from the incident field). The dynamic range is 2 V/m 800 V/m, with an option for 1200 V/m. For applications at lower frequencies, and/or to be used in a TEM cell device, HI-6005/6105/6022/6122 should be used. HI-6022/6122 is specified to operate from 10 khz 1 GHz, whereas HI-6005/6105 operates from 100 khz to 6 GHz. For HI-6022/6122, the isotropic response is better than +/- 0.5 db across the frequency band. HI-6005/6105 has isotropic response of better than +/- 0.5 db bellow 1 GHz. The isotropic response incurs approximately 0.5 db degradation for an increase of every gigahertz. For example, between 1-2 GHz, the isotropic response can be +/- 1 db from the ideal. The measurement uncertainties due to the non-ideal isotropic responses can be reduced if the probes are orientated similarly to their calibration geometries as outlined in the previous section. The self-contained (as opposed to the stalked ) probes, such as HI-6005/6105/6022/6122, are convenient in many applications because there is no need to worry about the placement of the electronics boxes, and are easier to fit in TEM cell devices. The reduced isotropic performance at a higher frequency is simply a compromise as a result of exposing the metallic box in the field of sensing. The degradation in isotropic response at higher frequencies is present for any probes with similar constructions, including those from other manufactures.

Linearity Considerations EMC probes are expected to be accurate for the entire dynamic range of the specifications. The users typically obtain frequency response correction factors for a fixed field level (e.g. 20 V/m) from a calibration lab. The corrections are valid for other field values. This is because the linearity response of the probe changes little with frequency. Each probe (HI-6022/6122/6005/6105/6053/6153) has a customized linearity table loaded at the factory. It is just as important to check the linearity at each calibration cycle as the frequency response.