Mr. Marc Dupuis Director General, Engineering, Planning and Standards Branch Industry Canada 19 th Floor, 300 Slater Street Ottawa ON K1A 0C8

Similar documents
Decisions on the Frequency Bands GHz, GHz and GHz

May 24, Sent via

Spectrum Utilization Policy, Decisions on the Band GHz

Re: Gazette Notice SLPB : Consultation on Releasing Millimetre Wave Spectrum to Support 5G

Director General 25 May 2007 Telecommunications Policy Branch Industry Canada 1612A, 300 Slater St. Ottawa,Ontario K1A 0C8. Dear Mr.

4-4 Is there a continuing need for bands below 3.7 GHz for long-haul systems or could this need be met in bands at 3.7 GHz and above?

March 2, 2018 Via

14 January Mr. Larry Shaw Director General Telecommunications Policy Branch Industry Canada 300 Slater Street Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0C8

Guidelines for the Submission of Applications to Provide Mobile-Satellite Service in Canada

Technical Requirements for Fixed Radio Systems Operating in the Bands GHz and GHz

Consultation on the Use of the Band GHz

Spectrum Utilization Policy Decisions for the Band MHz

ICASA s E-Band and V-Band Proposals (September 2015)

SaskTel Comments: Gazette Notice SLPB Consultation on Releasing Millimetre Wave Spectrum to Support 5G. September 15, 2017.

Spectrum Utilization Policy in the Frequency Range MHZ

Electronic Communications Committee (ECC) within the European Conference of Postal and Telecommunications Administrations (CEPT)

Spectrum Allocation and Utilization Policy Regarding the Use of Certain Frequency Bands Below 1.7 GHz for a Range of Radio Applications

Technical Requirements for Wireless Broadband Services (WBS) in the Band MHz

Spectrum Utilization Policy, Technical and Licensing Requirements for Wireless Broadband Services (WBS) in the Band MHz

Consultation on the Technical and Policy Framework for Radio Local Area Network Devices Operating in the MHz Frequency Band

COMMENTS OF TELESAT CANADA

The Meteorological Service of Canada (MSC) of Environment Canada commends Industry Canada for this very important public consultation.

Licensing Procedure for Automatic Meter Reading Equipment in the 1.4 GHz Band

Canada Gazette Notice No. SLPB : Addendum to the Consultation on Releasing Millimetre Wave Spectrum to Support 5G

SaskTel Comments: Gazette Notice SLPB Consultation on the Spectrum Outlook 2018 to February 16, Page 1

ECC Recommendation (14)01

Gazette Notice SMSE

Technical Requirements for Fixed Line-of-Sight Radio Systems Operating in the Band GHz

Spectrum Management Approach in the GHz and GHz bands Ofcom s decision on the future management approach for the 70/80 GHz bands

Consultation Paper on Using a Portion of the Band GHz for Tactical Common Data Link (TCDL) Systems

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING DECISION

Technical Requirements for Fixed Wireless Access Systems Operating in the Band MHz

Licensing Procedure for Wireless Broadband Services (WBS) in the Frequency Band MHz

ISED Consultation Submission by the Wireless Broadband Alliance

Consultation on Changes to the Canadian Table of Frequency Allocations and to RBR-4 to Allow for Amateur Radio Service Use in the 5 MHz Band

Urban WiMAX response to Ofcom s Spectrum Commons Classes for licence exemption consultation

REGULATORY GUILDELINES FOR DEPLOYMENT OF BROADBAND SERVICES ON THE GHz BAND

Huawei response to the Ofcom call for input: Fixed Wireless Spectrum Strategy

Technical Requirements for Cellular Radiotelephone Systems Operating in the Bands MHz and MHz

Consultation Paper on Public Safety Radio Interoperability Guidelines

Licensing Procedure for Remote Rural Broadband Systems (RRBS) Operating in the Band MHz (TV channels 21 to 51)

DSA Submission to the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India Consultation on Public Wi-Fi

White Space Devices (WSDs)

Policy for Allocation and Assignment of Spectrum 2.5GHz Band (2500MHz MHz)

Information for Operators of Digitally Modulated Radio Systems in Licence-Exempt Radio Frequency Bands

Microwave Licensing Policy Framework

Electronic Communications Committee (ECC) within the European Conference of Postal and Telecommunications Administrations (CEPT)

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, DC 20554

Re: Gazette Notice No. DGSO Consultation on Renewal Process for 2300 MHz and 3500 MHz Licences

February 25, 2011 Government of Alberta Rural Broadband Response to

2 GHz Licence-exempt Personal Communications Service Devices (LE-PCS)

April 12, Mr. Larry Shaw Director General Telecommunications Policy Branch Industry Canada 300 Slater Street Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0C8

Alcatel-Lucent is pleased to submit the attached comments in response to the above-captioned consultation.

Q1. What future uses might this spectrum support?

Technical Requirements for Fixed Line-of-Sight Radio Systems Operating in the Band MHz

Spectrum Utilization Policy, Technical and Licensing Requirements for Broadband Public Safety in the Band MHz

Licensing Procedure for Differential Global Positioning System (DGPS) Stations

SRSP-518 Issue 2 October Spectrum Management and Telecommunications. Standard Radio System Plan

Policy for the Licensing of Very Low Capacity Point to Point Links in the Band MHz

Technical Requirements for Fixed Line-of-Sight Radio Systems Operating in the Band MHz

Technical Requirements for Land Mobile and Fixed Radio Services Operating in the Bands MHz and MHz

Decisions on Spectrum Utilization Policies and Technical Requirements Related to Backhaul

Technical Requirements for Land Mobile and Fixed Radio Services Operating in the Bands / MHz and / MHz

Technical Requirements for Fixed Radio Systems Operating in the Bands GHz and GHz

Kordia Submission on Preparing for 5G in New Zealand. 8 May 2018

Mobile Communication Services on Aircraft Publication date: May /34/EC Notification number: 2014/67/UK

Canadian Network Operators Consortium Inc. Consortium des Operateurs de Réseaux Canadiens Inc.

Technical Requirements for Fixed Line-of-Sight Radio Systems Operating in the Band MHz

Spectrum Management and Telecommunications

Guidance Notes Fixed Point to Point Link Above 1GHz

the regulatory and licensing structure for small-cell Internet access on the 3.5 GHz band. 1

Release of the GHz Band

Use of the 5 GHz Shared Band for the Provision of Public Mobile Services. Consultation Paper. 1 February 2018

IR UK Interface Requirement 2098

JRC Response to the Consultation on. More Radio Spectrum for the Internet of Things

Consultation on the licensing of spectrum in the 800 MHz and 900 MHz bands

IARU Positions on WRC-15 Agenda Items

Spectrum Pricing Comparing Different Concepts for Implementation

Before INDUSTRY CANADA Ottawa, Canada

Advanced Frequency Reuse

SRSP Issue 2 March 3, Spectrum Management. Standard Radio System Plan

Narrowband and Wideband Public Safety Radiocommunication Systems in the Bands MHz and MHz

mmwave Fixed Wireless Regulatory Aspects

Deployment scenarios and interference analysis using V-band beam-steering antennas

Licence Application Submission Procedure for Planned Radio Stations Below 960 MHz

Response to Ofcom consultation: Consultation and information on technical licence conditions for 800MHz and 2 6GHz spectrum and related matters

Technical Requirements for Fixed Radio Systems Operating in the Bands MHz and MHz

Technical Requirements for Fixed Line-of-Sight Radio Systems Operating in the Band MHz

Inmarsat response to Ofcom Consultation: Licence Exemption of Wireless Telegraphy Devices - Candidates for 2011

Arqiva submission to Ofcom s consultation, 5G spectrum access at 26 GHz and update on bands above 30 GHz

April 18, Dear Mr. Proulx,

Consultation on the Technical and Policy Framework for White Space Devices

SRSP-101 Issue 1 May Spectrum Management. Standard Radio System Plan

Industry Canada Spectrum Management and Telecommunications Policy

Huawei response to the Ofcom consultation on Future use of the 700MHz band

Dynamic Spectrum Alliance response to consultation on the ACMA Five-year spectrum outlook

Spectrum and Licensing Policy to Permit Ancillary Terrestrial Mobile Services as Part of Mobile-Satellite Service Offerings

Radio Transmitters and Receivers Operating in the Land Mobile and Fixed Services in the Frequency Range MHz

Canadian 700 MHz Auction

Further Consultation on the Release of the / MHz Sub-band

Transcription:

Rogers Communications 333 Bloor Street East Toronto, Ontario M4W 1G9 Tel. (416) 935-7211 Fax (416) 935-7719 rwi_gr@rci.rogers.com Dawn Hunt Vice-President Regulatory October 21, 2011 Mr. Marc Dupuis Director General, Engineering, Planning and Standards Branch Industry Canada 19 th Floor, 300 Slater Street Ottawa ON K1A 0C8 Sent via email: Spectrum.Engineering@ic.gc.ca Dear Mr. Dupuis, Re: Canada Gazette, Part I, July 23, 2011, Consultation on Spectrum Utilization of Frequency Bands 71-76 GHz, 81-86 GHz and 92-95 GHz by the Fixed Service SMSE-010-11 Rogers Communications Partnership (Rogers) appreciates the opportunity to provide comments on the above-noted consultation. The documents are being sent in Adobe Acrobat Pro X Version 10. The operating system used is Microsoft Windows XP. Regards, Dawn Hunt DH/gt Attach WIRELESS DIGITAL CABLE INTERNET HOME PHONE VIDEO PUBLISHING BROADCASTING

Comments of Rogers Communications Partnership Consultation on Spectrum Utilization of Frequency Bands 71-76 GHz, 81-86 GHz and 92-95 GHz by the Fixed Service Published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, on July 23, 2011 Submitted October 21, 2011

Rogers Communications Partnership Page 1 Executive Summary 1. Rogers Communication Partnership ( Rogers ) strongly supports making the bands 71-76 GHz, 81-86 GHz, 92-94 GHz and 94.1-95 GHz available for pointto-point fixed links use, in order to construct fixed links that are required for our evolving and expanding networks. 2. Rogers recommends the use of a frequency division duplex (FDD) band plan arrangement such as the European CEPT Recommendation ECC/REC/(05)07. This arrangement has the added benefit of allowing for the aggregation of channels to support higher capacities when needed. 3. Measures such as frequency coordination and pre-construction interference analysismust be taken tominimize the risk of harmful interference. Rogers supports the RABC in recommending that the European CEPT technical specifications listed in EN 302 217-3 and in EN 302 217-4-2, which will facilitate the availability of 70 GHz and 80 GHz infrastructure in Canada. 4. A spectrum licence model is the most appropriate authorization approach. Rogers favours a light licensing approach and does not agree with the concept of an independent band manager due to the likely high level of fees that would result. Introduction 5. The Department issued a consultation paper titled Consultation on Spectrum Utilization of Frequency Bands 71-76 GHz, 81-86 GHz and 92-95 GHz by the Fixed Service, Canada Gazette, Part I, Notice No. SMSE-010-11, ( the Consultation ) on July 23, 2011. In the Consultation paper, the Department invited comments on the future use of the bands 71-76 GHz, 81-86 GHz and 92-95 GHz (the Bands ) by the fixed service, including designation, band plan, technical characteristics and the licensing approach. Following are the comments of Rogers. 6. Rogers is pleased to provide the following comments regarding the issues under consideration in the Consultation Paper. Rogers participated in the development of the comments that have been prepared by the Radio Advisory Board of Canada ( RABC ). Rogers support for certain specific positions is identified below.

Rogers Communications Partnership Page 2 Detailed Comments 7. Following are Rogers detailed comments regarding the specific issues raised in the Consultation Paper. Applications in Canada The Department seeks comments on making the bands 71-76 GHz, 81-86 GHz, 92-94 GHz and94.1-95 GHz available for point-to-point fixed links. Comments are also sought on the technical parameters for satellite systems in the 71-76 GHzand 81-86 GHz bands that should be used in the development of measures to coordinate the useof the fixed and satellite services in these bands. 8. Rogers provided comments to the Department s consultation on a Policy and Technical Framework for the 700 MHz Band and Aspects Related to Commercial Mobile Spectrum ( the 700 MHz consultation; SMSE-018-10) 1 in February 2011. Among the questions asked in this consultation was, [w]hat is the general need for additional commercial mobile spectrum at this time and what do you anticipate the future needs to be? 9. In its comments to the 700 MHz consultation, Rogers stated 2 that its commercial mobile network, which serves over nine million Canadians, is undergoing a transformation from providing voice-related services to providing mobile broadband services which require much more bandwidth. 10. Rogers deployment of advanced wireless access technologies, such as HSPA and LTE, which support mobile broadband services, has in turn required an unprecedented network densification and backhaul augmentation program. 3 This technology shift has placed a significant demand on Rogers backhaul network facilities, above and beyond the regular subscriber and traffic growth that we experience each year. As a result, Rogers is in need of access to more spectrum for fixed point-to-point backhaul services. 1 http://www.ic.gc.ca/eic/site/smt-gst.nsf/eng/sf09949.html#s4.1 2 http://www.ic.gc.ca/eic/site/smt-gst.nsf/vwapj/smse-018-10-abridged.pdf/$file/smse-018-10- abridged.pdf 3 http://www.ic.gc.ca/eic/site/smt-gst.nsf/vwapj/smse-018-10-abridged.pdf/$file/smse-018-10- abridged.pdf, paragraph 21.

Rogers Communications Partnership Page 3 11. In addition, the short-distance propagation properties, extremely directional main beam characteristics,and commercially available infrastructure capable of gigabit per second capacity make equipment in the Bands very suitable for deployment in urban environments. These installations typically require short range and high capacity links. For Rogers, it is a good alternative to fiber-based, last mile transport systems due to its relative cost and speed of deployment. 12. For these reasons, Rogers strongly supports making the bands 71-76 GHz, 81-86 GHz, 92-94 GHz and 94.1-95 GHz available for point-to-point fixed link use. 13. Rogers supports the Department s proposal of harmonization with the U.S. technical rules on equipment technical characteristics. Rogers agrees that the fixed servicesuse of the bands 71-76 GHz, 81-86 GHz, 92-94 GHz and 94.1-95 GHz should be permitted only on a licensed basis. Frequency Band Plan Structure and Technical Considerations The Department seeks comments on the band plan structure. 14. Rogers recommends the use of a frequency division duplex (FDD) arrangement for the band plan structure. Rogers notes that the European CEPT Recommendation ECC/REC(05)07 4 has such an arrangement, with the 71-76 GHz frequency band segmented into 19 x 250 MHz channels, and the same segmentation in the 81-86 GHz band. This arrangement allows channel aggregation and simplified interference coordination. Included in the CEPT Recommendation are two 125 MHz guard bands on both sides of the 71-76 GHz and 81-86 GHz bands. 15. The U.S. band plan structure is divided into unpaired segments. After comparing the U.S. and European band plan structure options, and in light of the FDD band segmentation in the European CEPT Recommendation, Rogers favours the European CEPT Recommendation over the U.S. band plan structure. 16. In general, band plans should support expanding fixed link capacity provisioning levels by allowing flexibility in channel aggregation to provide for larger bandwidths when needed. This flexibility will be important for supporting the dramatic growth of mobile broadband traffic over the next several years. The 4 http://www.erodocdb.dk/docs/doc98/official/pdf/rec0507.pdf

Rogers Communications Partnership Page 4 European CEPT Recommendation band plan structure allows for channel aggregation to provide larger bandwidths when needed. 17. By means of the frequency band segmentation, the CEPT Recommendation band plan structure also simplifies interference-reduction coordination which is an important practice to Rogers for the reasons outlined below. Interference Analysis and Mitigation Measures The Department seeks comments, with technical justification and interference analyses, on the likelihood of interference to/from other radio services and on the appropriate mitigation measures that should apply in the bands 71-76 GHz, 81-86 GHz and 92-95 GHz. 18. Rogers recognizes that the likelihood of harmful interference that a proposed link may receive from or impose upon existing linksin the Bands is relatively low due to the high attenuation over short distances and the narrow beam characteristics of microwave signals in the Bands. 19. However, despite the reduced probability of interference, any harmful interference, no matter how brief, would have a significant impact due to the high link capacity. 20. As microwave links in these bands operate at gigabit per second (Gbps) speeds, even a brief outage spanning a few seconds would translate into a huge loss of data intended for transmission. Therefore, Rogers believes that interference analysis should be required by the licensee proposing the new or modified fixed link prior to activating any new or modified fixed linkwithin the Bands. 21. In the event that interference analysis indicates that interference is likely to occur, the licensee proposing the new or modified fixed link must apply common interference mitigation techniques to minimizethe possibility of interference. These methods include antenna discrimination, polarization, frequency offset, shielding and power control. The licensee that is proposing the new or modified link must be required to re-perform and pass the interference analysis again after applying the mitigation techniques to confirm that the possibility of interference has been eliminated prior to construction. Comments are also sought on what requirements would be necessary to facilitate sharing between the various services, such as coordination requirements, operational constraints and/or power flux density (PFD) limits.

Rogers Communications Partnership Page 5 22. Rogers believes that the coordination criteria for the Bands should be similar to those in the 38 GHz band, but with reduced distances to reflect the shorter propagation and narrow beam characteristics of the 70/80/90 GHz Bands. Comments are additionally sought on the feasibility of uncoordinated deployment of fixed systems. If coordination is needed, input is sought on appropriate technical and/or operational mechanisms for coordination. 23. As stated above, Rogers requires a high grade of service on its fixed links so that it can provide high quality mobile broadband services to its customers. Any harmful interference, no matter how brief, would result in huge data transmission losses resulting in degraded services to end users. 24. Rogers believes that uncoordinated deployment of fixed systems would hinder interference analysis prior to the activation of a fixed link in the Bands, which is required to reduce the likelihood of harmful interference. 25. In other words, Rogers believes that uncoordinated deployment of fixed systems within the Bands would lead to harmful interference which would significantly impact its fixed systems and availability of services being backhauled over these links. For this reason, Rogers does not support uncoordinated deployment of fixed systems within the Bands. 26. As stated above, Rogers believes that the coordination criteria for the Bands should be similar to those in the 38 GHz band, but with reduced distances to reflect the shorter propagation and narrow beam characteristics of the 70/80/90 GHz Bands. Technical Specifications Comments are sought on the technical rules for the 71-76 GHz, 81-86 GHz, 92-94 GHz and 94.1-95 GHz bands, as listed above. Interested parties are invited to comment on the technical specifications such as minimum and maximum antenna gain, power spectral density limit, etc. Parties who advocate different service rules for these bands should include a technical analysis and justification.

Rogers Communications Partnership Page 6 27. Rogers recommends that the European CEPT technical specifications found in documents EN 302 217-3 and EN 302 217-4-2 be adopted, in order to facilitate the availability of 70 GHz and 80 GHz infrastructure in Canada. We support the comments of the RABC regarding the use of these technical specifications. 28. Rogers agrees with the RABC s observation that there are currently insufficient technical specifications available for the 90 GHz band to provide the Department with an informed response. Rogers is prepared to work with the Department and the RABC to develop technical rules for the 90 GHz band. Licensing The Department requests comments on the authorization approach to be undertaken for use ofthe 71-76 GHz, 81-86 GHz and 92-95 GHz frequency bands. Should licensing be recommended,comments are requested on the manner in which such authorizations are to be issued(i.e. non-exclusive spectrum licences, FCFS, spectrum auction, etc.). 29. In the Consultation, the Department offers three authorization options: radio licences, spectrum licences or licence exemption. 30. Fixed links in the Bands accommodate high capacity systems. Radio licence fees have a cost structure that is based upon fixed link throughput. As a result, high capacity fixed links in the Bands will drive high spectrum fees. High spectrum fees will jeopardize the business case of any proposed fixed link system. Further, the need for radio licences for each link would require a higher level of administration for both the Department and licensees. Radio licensing is therefore less efficient than other alternatives. 31. Rogers understands that the licence exemption approach assumes no spectrum fees and no frequency coordination. Although the risk of harmful interference in the Bands is less than that of alternate bands that are comprised of lower frequencies, Rogers believes that some form of frequency coordination will be required in order to minimize the risk of harmful interference and to ensure that the necessary operational performance standards will be met to support the high quality of service required by these high-speed transport facilities.

Rogers Communications Partnership Page 7 32. The spectrum licence approach offers a balance between licensing which will prevent harmful interference and a light level of administration. 33. Given the above observations, Rogers believes that the most appropriate authorization approach for the Bands would be the spectrum licence model, which offers a balance of protection from harmful interference and a light licensing approach. 34. In terms of a licensing mechanism, Rogers recommends that the Department adopt a First-Come, First-Served (FCFS) process with a non-exclusive spectrum/area licensing approach. This process will facilitate the timely and cost-effective acquisition of spectrum licenses for fixed links. Whichever mechanism is chosen, it is important that the fee structure supports a high level of deployment and band utilization. Rogers is concerned that, if the current fee schedule used for fixed point to point bands is used, this spectrum will not be an economical candidate for broadband backhaul. For example, under the current fee schedule a link with 1GHz bandwidth would attract annual spectrum fees of $13,456. This is based upon the calculation of 15,625 64 khz voice channels (BD code) multiplied by 4 (to account for transmit and receive at each end of the link)). This is in excess of 650 times more than the fee proposed by the RABC which is based on Ofcom s light licensing regime. 35. Rogers strongly recommends that the Department harmonize its fixed point-topoint backhaul spectrum fees with the more reasonable fees that are currently used in other major jurisdictions such as those in the U.S. or U.K. In the event that any such harmonization cannot be completed in the near term, Rogers urges the Department to waive fees associated with the 70/80/90 GHz bands to facilitate deployment of fixed links in the bands. 36. In order for link deployment to be cost effective, Rogers proposes that the annual fee be based upon utilized bandwidth and reflect a cost recovery mechanism. 37. As a means of encouraging efficient use of the spectrum, Rogers recommends that the licensee be required to place each registered link into service within twelve months from the date stamp of the registration.

Rogers Communications Partnership Page 8 Comments are also sought on the option to allow independent band managers to oversee useraccess and coordination within these bands. 38. In the Consultation, the Department has proposed that independent band managers could be assigned responsibility to facilitate and manage access to the Bands. 39. As stated above, Rogers believes that some form of light licensing should be implemented in order to prevent the possibility of harmful interference. 40. However, Rogers does not support the concept of independent band managers that are licensed as a result of winning a competitive selection process, especially if these parties will be permitted to impose any form of fees upon the licensees. The risk involved with the band manager charging fees to the licensees is that the band managers will seek to earn a profit by charging higher fees than would be applied to merely recover the cost of managing the spectrum. This would unreasonably inflate the fees charged to spectrum users. As stated above, a high fee structure will jeopardize the business case of a proposed fixed link system and will discourage the use of this spectrum to support new and innovative services, including mobile broadband services. Conclusions 41. Rogers strongly supports making the bands 71-76 GHz, 81-86 GHz, 92-94 GHz and 94.1-95 GHz available for point-to-point fixed links use, in order to construct fixed links for our evolving and growing broadband networks. 42. Rogers supports a frequency division duplex (FDD) band plan arrangement such as the European CEPT Recommendation. This arrangement will permit the aggregation of channels to support higher capacities when needed. 43. The risk of harmful interference in these Bands must be minimized through measures such as frequency coordination and interference analysis prior to the construction or modification of a fixed link system that utilizes the Bands. For these reasons, uncoordinated deployment of the Bands should not be permitted. 44. Rogers supports the use of the European CEPT technical specifications listed in EN 302 217-3 and in EN 302 217-4-2, which will facilitate the availability of 70 GHz and 80 GHz infrastructure in Canada. 45. Rogers believes that the most appropriate authorization approach for the Bands is the spectrum licence model, which offers a balance of protection from harmful interference and a light licensing approach that reduces administrative overhead. Rogers supports the use of a First-Come, First-Served process with a non-

Rogers Communications Partnership Page 9 exclusive spectrum/area licensing approach. 46. Rogers does not support the concept of independent band managers that are licensed as a result of a competitive selection process. Rogers believes that this may unreasonably inflate fees charged to spectrum users, which will jeopardize the business case of proposed fixed link systems and will discourage the use of the Bands to support new and innovative services. 47. Rogers Communications Partnership appreciates the opportunity to provide comments to this important consultation.