NEW YORK STOCK EXCHANGE LLC OFFICE OF HEARING OFFICERS

Similar documents
Name of Registrant: - Amanda Gauthier (referred August 8, 2013) Dates of Hearing: January 15 and 16, 2014; March 24, Decision and Reasons

S17Y1593. IN THE MATTER OF JOHN F. MEYERS. This disciplinary matter is before the Court on the report of the Review

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH. Case No. COMPLAINT

Ross Jones vs. Dept. of Mental Health

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 09/07/18 Page 1 of 14

THE MATTER : BEFORE THE SCHOOL

IN THE MATTER OF THE REAL ESTATE SERVICES ACT DENISE RENEE DECARY

FILED BEFORE THE HEARING BOARD

In the ARBITRATION between: Bongani Nunu (Union / Applicant) and. Kansai Plascon (Pty) Ltd (Respondent) PO Box 5217 CAPE TOWN 8000

ALAN G. HEVESI, : Defendant. : DEPUTY CHIEF INVESTIGATOR GREGORY J. STASIUK of the Office of

BEFORE THE SCHOOL IN THE MATTER OF

At its meeting of June 16, 2011, the State Board of Examiners (Board) reviewed

IN THE MATTER OF THE SECURITIES ACT, R.S.O. 1990, c. S.5, AS AMENDED. - and - ROBERT WALTER HARRIS

received from the Criminal History Review Unit (CHRU) regarding Sherrvell A. Johnson. The CHRU

NOTICE OF PUBLICATION BAN

December 5, Activities Following the I-35W Bridge Collapse

NASD REGULATION, INC. OFFICE OF HEARING OFFICERS. Complainant, : Disciplinary Proceeding : No. C v. :

485 DOS 12. The applicant, having been advised of her right to representation, chose to represent herself.

Case No: PSHS /17 Commissioner: Thando Ndlebe Date of award: 20 October 2017 In the matter between:

NASD OFFICE OF HEARING OFFICERS

At its meeting of September 16, 2010, the State Board of Examiners (Board) reviewed

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA I N D I C T M E N T. - against - Cr. No. (T. 15, U.S.C., 78j(b), SANJAY KUMAR and 78m(a) and 78ff; T. 18,

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

INVESTIGATOR GERARD J. MATHESON, SHIELD # 130, of the Office of the

STATE OF FLORIDA FLORIDA ELECTIONS COMMISSION FINAL ORDER. THIS CAUSE came on to be heard at an informal hearing held before the Florida APPEARANCES

Defendant. : INVESTIGATOR GERARD J. MATHESON, SHIELD #130, of the Office of the

BEMPSEY G. CO, being duly sworn, deposes and says that he is a Special Agent with the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and charges as follows:

Courthouse News Service

Defendant. : YOU ARE HEREBY SUMMONED to answer in this action and serve a copy of your

Case 1:14-cv AJS Document 1 Filed 08/21/14 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

14A Social Games Authorization Limited.

THE REAL ESTATE COUNCIL OF BRITISH COLUMBIA. IN THE MATTER OF THE REAL ESTATE SERVICES ACT S.B.C. 2004, c. 42 as amended AND IN THE MATTER OF

DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF NURSES OF ONTARIO. PANEL: April Plumton, RPN Chairperson Karen Laforet, RN Barbara Titley, RPN

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C FORM 8-K

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ORDER

PROVINCE OF NEW BRUNSWICK. Labour and Employment Board

VIRTU FINANCIAL, INC.

ANSWER WITH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES

IN THE VANDERBURGH CIRCUIT COURT

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF ORANGE. Sam Sloan. Petitioner INDEX No against-

DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF NURSES OF ONTARIO. PANEL: Lindsay Hyslop, NP Chairperson Nancy Sears, RN Tammy Hedge, RPN Member

Lawyers sued over advice to board

ALBERTA COLLEGE OF PHARMACISTS IN THE MATTER OF THE HEALTH PROFESSIONS ACT. AND IN THE MATTER OF A HEARING REGARDING THE CONDUCT OF Connie Orbeck

Truckee Fire Protection District Board of Directors

University of West Georgia Summary Report Investigation of Allegations Made Against the Vice President of University Advancement April 8, 2011

ORDER OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA

BEFORE THE MEDICAL BOARD OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS STATE OF CALIFORNIA

In the Matter of the Association of Alfred G. Block (CRD # ) with Buckman, Buckman & Reid, Inc. (CRD # 23407)

Letter to the Workers comp executive regarding the California State Auditor s Investigation Report Issued in March 2019

United States Small Business Administration Office of Hearings and Appeals

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE December 9, 2002 Session

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE BEFORE THE SECRETARY OF AGRICULTURE

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA OFFICE OF THE STATE AUDITOR BETH A. WOOD, CPA ALBEMARLE COMMISSION HERTFORD, NORTH CAROLINA

Case 5:16-cv HRL Document 1 Filed 06/14/16 Page 1 of 10

ORDER. This is the final administrative determination in this matter. Any further review should be pursued in a judicial forum.

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT ************

2018 SCHOLARSHIP APPLICATION

The Players. Mark Zuckerberg. November 2003

Case 3:02-cv EBB Document 34 Filed 01/20/2004 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT. Plaintiff,

IN THE INDUSTRIAL COURT OF SWAZILAND

ADDENDUM D COMERICA WEB INVOICING TERMS AND CONDITIONS

SUPREME COURT OF MISSOURI en banc

TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN S SERVICES, Petitioner, vs. NANCY BETH KASCH, Grievant

TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF MENTAL HEALTH AND SUBSTANCE ABUSE SERVICES, Petitioner, vs. GWENDOLYN STEWART-JEFFERY, Grievant

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

APPEAL TO BOARD OF VETERANS APPEALS

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA. BBK Tobacco & Foods, LLP, an Arizona limited liability partnership, d/b/a HBI International,

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/25/2012 INDEX NO /2012 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/25/2012. Index No.

Case 3:14-cv PK Document 53 Filed 04/23/15 Page 1 of 7

IN THE MATTER OF A DISCIPLINE HEARING HELD PURSUANT TO THE REAL ESTATE AND BUSINESS BROKERS ACT, 2002, S.O. 2002, c. 30, Sch. C

At its meeting of December 13, 2012, the State Board of Examiners (Board) reviewed

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C FORM 8-K

ORDINANCE NO Adopted by the Sacramento City Council. April 14, 2016

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. G STEVEN BROWNING, EMPLOYEE CENTRAL ADJUSTMENT COMPANY, INC.

Submitted August 30, 2017 Decided. Before Judges Rothstadt and Vernoia.

Mansfield & Ashfield Clinical Commissioning Group Newark & Sherwood Clinical Commissioning Group DISCIPLINARY POLICY

MOODY S CORPORATION (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Charter)

PlainSite. Legal Document. Virginia Eastern Bankruptcy Court Case No Amanda Alexx Giovanni- Adversary Proceeding. Document 1.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

JAMES A. KUCHTA, SAL OLIVO,

Volume III. After the Gold Standard,

IDEXX LABORATORIES, INC.

EMPLOYEE SECONDMENT AGREEMENT

At its meeting of June 8, 2006, the State Board of Examiners reviewed information

DNVGL-CG-0214 Edition September 2016

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C FORM 8-K

BEFORE THE CORPORATION COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA. Contempt, Fines and Compliance with Commission Rules

RESIGNATION COMMITTEE REPORT

CIRCUIT COURT OF COLE COUNTY, MISSOURI AMENDED CLASS-ACTION PETITION

CLEAN ENERGY FUELS CORP. Filed by PICKENS BOONE

- 2 - "I HATE MY PC" includes all other joint ventures and licensees of CHEQUERED GECKO Pty Ltd.

New York University University Policies

GAO PENSION BENEFIT GUARANTY CORPORATION. Appearance of Improper Influence in Certain Contract Awards. Testimony

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION. Washington, D.C FORM 8-K CURRENT REPORT. Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the

Terms of Business for ICICI Bank Investment Services (effective from October, 2013)

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/04/2013 INDEX NO /2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/04/2013

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

IVIEWIT HOLDINGS, INC.

Action: Notice of an application for an order under sections 6(c), 12(d)(1)(J), and 57(c) of the

Transcription:

NEW YORK STOCK EXCHANGE LLC OFFICE OF HEARING OFFICERS NYSE Regulation, on behalf of New York Stock Exchange LLC, Complainant, Disciplinary Proceeding No. 2018-03-00016 v. Kevin Kean Lodewick Jr. (CRD No. 4308532), Respondent. COMPLAINT NYSE Regulation ( NYSER ), on behalf of New York Stock Exchange LLC (the NYSE or the Exchange ), alleges: Summary 1. This matter concerns a kickback scheme involving Kevin Kean Lodewick Jr. ( Lodewick ), a former floor broker at Quattro M Securities Inc. ( Quattro ) and current floor broker at Peter Mancuso & Co. L.P. ( Mancuso ), and Lodewick s subsequent attempts to obstruct the investigation into his misconduct. Specifically, Lodewick received dozens of undisclosed cash kickbacks from an employee of a third-party broker-dealer (the BD ) in return for routing millions of dollars of orders to that same employee (the BD Employee ) while employed at Quattro. Lodewick also received undisclosed cash payments from the BD Employee for introducing him to other prospective customers. This scheme was conducted in complete disregard of the interests of Quattro s customers. Once Lodewick learned that he was being investigated by NYSER, he began obstructing NYSER s investigation in an effort to cover up his fraudulent scheme lying to NYSER staff when under oath, failing to produce and/or 1

destroying relevant evidence, and encouraging the BD Employee to deny that Lodewick had ever received kickbacks. 2. During the period when Lodewick employed his fraudulent scheme and cover-up (March 2017 through the present, or the Relevant Period ), Lodewick received dozens of undisclosed kickbacks. By engaging in his kickback scheme, Lodewick violated NYSE Rules 2010 (Standards of Commercial Honor and Principles of Trade) and 2020 (Use of Manipulative, Deceptive or Other Fraudulent Devices). 3. In connection with NYSER s investigation, NYSER, pursuant to NYSE Rule 8210, requested that Lodewick produce certain documents and appear for on-the-record testimony ( OTR ). As detailed below, Lodewick failed to produce and/or destroyed certain documents and other evidence requested by NYSER. Then, during his OTR, Lodewick knowingly provided false testimony and lied to NYSER staff while under oath. Lodewick further attempted to obstruct NYSER s investigation by encouraging the BD Employee to deny that Lodewick had ever received kickbacks. As a result, Lodewick violated NYSE Rule 8210(c) (Provision of Information and Testimony and Inspection and Copying of Books). Respondent and Jurisdiction 4. Lodewick joined Quattro as a floor broker in October 2007, and remained an employee of Quattro until February 2018. Quattro filed a Form U5 for Lodewick on May 14, 2018, in which it claimed his departure from Quattro was voluntary. 5. After being suspended and ultimately terminated by Quattro, Lodewick became a registered representative and an employee of Mancuso, also as a NYSE floor broker, on or about April 30, 2018, and continues in that role at present. 2

6. At all relevant times, Lodewick was a registered representative and an employee of an NYSE member organization. Statement of Facts A. Lodewick s Kickback Scheme 7. In or around October 2016, the BD Employee attended a social event with a number of NYSE floor brokers, including Lodewick. Shortly thereafter, the BD Employee contacted Lodewick to pitch the services that the BD Employee could provide to Lodewick in his role at Quattro. At that time, Quattro was not yet a client of the BD. 8. At some point in late 2016 or early 2017, Lodewick then introduced the BD Employee to others at Quattro, including Eugene Mauro ( Mauro ), the Chief Executive Officer and President of Quattro. Mauro subsequently approved the addition of the BD s strategies to Quattro s NYSE handheld devices. Lodewick was the driving force in Quattro becoming a client of the BD and, subsequently, Lodewick began introducing the BD Employee to a number of other NYSE floor brokers, some of whom ultimately also became clients of the BD. 9. The BD Employee was compensated in large part through commissions earned from NYSE floor brokers order flow. The more orders the NYSE floor brokers routed for execution, the more the BD Employee was paid, and a significant portion of the BD Employee s commissions during the Relevant Period came from Quattro orders. During the period of March 2017 through February 2018, Lodewick routed millions of dollars of orders to the BD Employee. 10. Starting in March 2017, and continuing until at least early February 2018, the BD Employee made numerous payments totaling approximately $2,000 to Lodewick via Venmo, a mobile phone cash transfer application. The payments ranged in size from $10 to $125, and occurred as frequently as four times per day. For example, on January 24, 2018, the BD 3

Employee sent Lodewick four Venmo payments throughout the trading day as more orders came from Lodewick. Lodewick routed almost $500,000 of securities to the BD Employee on that day. 11. The BD Employee made numerous payments to Lodewick for Lodewick s order flow and Lodewick s introductions to other potential clients. 12. For example, on September 15, 2017, the BD Employee transferred $30 to Lodewick via Venmo, along with the message, Thanks for a good week. On January 11, 2018, the BD Employee transferred $20 to Lodewick along with the message Let s go - stop this odd lot shit, to mock Lodewick for the small size of Lodewick s trades that day. 13. Lodewick also affirmatively solicited payments from the BD Employee in return for order flow. For example, Lodewick on multiple occasions called the BD Employee before the market open telling the BD Employee to get his Venmo ready because it was going to be a big day. 14. Lodewick participated in this kickback scheme without disclosing it to Quattro s customers, and in complete disregard of their interests. 15. In addition to the dozens of kickback payments that Lodewick received over the course of a year, the BD Employee also arranged, at Lodewick s request, for Lodewick to accompany a number of BD employees on a trip in December 2017 to a private island in the Bahamas owned by one of the BD s executives. The BD paid for Lodewick s travel to and from the island and also provided for Lodewick s accommodations. Lodewick was the only client of the BD to attend this trip. B. Lodewick s Scheme is Uncovered 16. As Lodewick later described to the BD Employee, on or about the morning of February 13, 2018, Mauro received an anonymous communication informing him that, among 4

other improper conduct, Lodewick was receiving kickbacks from an employee of the BD. A heated argument between Mauro and Lodewick ensued and, as a result, Mauro informed Lodewick that his employment at Quattro was being suspended, and that he had to leave the NYSE floor immediately. Shortly thereafter, Mauro contacted NYSE Operations Staff and requested that the Exchange suspend Lodewick s access to the Exchange s premises and systems. While Lodewick was not formally terminated by Quattro until May 14, 2018, he never returned to the NYSE floor as a broker for Quattro. 17. Shortly after his removal from the NYSE floor on February 13, 2018, Lodewick met with the BD Employee and explained that the anonymous communication received by Mauro had led to his suspension. 18. Lodewick began his current employment as a floor broker at Mancuso on or about April 30, 3018, after Quattro had made the decision to terminate him. C. Lodewick s Obstruction and Cover-Up 19. On March 5, 2018, NYSER initiated an investigation in connection with Lodewick s suspension (the Investigation ). Since then, Lodewick has repeatedly sought to obstruct the Investigation and stop NYSER from learning about his kickback scheme. 20. As will be discussed below, Lodewick has obstructed the Investigation by: (1) providing false testimony, (2) withholding and/or destroying evidence, and (3) encouraging the BD Employee to lie to NYSER staff. 21. During Lodewick s April 10, 2018 OTR in connection with the investigation, Lodewick lied under oath multiple times. a. Lodewick falsely testified that he had never received any payments from the BD or any of the BD s employees (e.g., Q: You ve never been paid any money whatsoever by any employee of [BD]? A: No, we pay them 5

every month. Q: Have you ever received anything of value from any employee of [BD]? A: No. ). b. Lodewick falsely claimed that his suspension had been the result of a disagreement with Mauro concerning Lodewick s attitude and work ethic, and that, to his knowledge, no other issues had contributed to his suspension despite the fact that Lodewick told the BD Employee that he was suspended because Mauro had received an anonymous communication alleging that Lodewick was receiving kickbacks from the BD Employee (among other improprieties). c. Lodewick falsely testified that he had never used his personal cellular phone to conduct business-related communications with the BD Employee (despite the existence of numerous texts proving otherwise). 22. Lodewick was aware that his statements were under oath and were false when he made them. 23. In addition to lying under oath, Lodewick has withheld and/or destroyed documents requested by NYSER. 24. For example, on April 13, 2018, NYSER requested, from Lodewick and Quattro, all text messages sent or received on or after January 1, 2018 between Lodewick s personal cellular phone and any employee of the BD, including the BD Employee. Counsel for Quattro and Lodewick responded in writing on April 18, 2018 that there were no such communications responsive to NYSER s request. 25. In fact, Lodewick traded hundreds of text messages with the BD Employee during the period covered by NYSER s request, including a text message Lodewick sent the BD 6

Employee on the same day that his counsel informed NYSER that no such communications existed. Lodewick and the BD Employee continued to send text messages to each other on a regular basis for months as NYSER s investigation continued, including as recently as a few weeks before the filing of this complaint. Lodewick has not produced a single one of these text messages with the BD Employee, despite the fact that NYSER s request imposes an obligation on Lodewick to continue producing documents as they become available. 26. Also, following his suspension by Mauro on February 13, 2018, Lodewick told the BD Employee that he intentionally deleted his Venmo account. This was a clear effort to purposefully hide the payments he had received from the BD Employee. 27. Lodewick further attempted to cover up his misconduct through his interactions with the BD Employee. For example, on April 4, 2018, while Lodewick was in the process of arranging a new position as a NYSE floor broker with Mancuso, in an effort to prevent his future employer from learning of his kickback scheme, Lodewick instructed the BD Employee Don t say anything to Peter [Mancuso]. 28. Similarly, after NYSER issued an OTR notice to the BD Employee, Lodewick sought to influence the BD Employee s upcoming statements to NYSER staff by urging him to characterize the Venmo payments as personal transactions between friends even though, as discussed above, the BD Employee had sent Lodewick dozens of payments as kickbacks for routing orders to the BD Employee. 29. And, on June 26, 2018, the week before the filing of this Complaint, Lodewick called the BD Employee and asked about the date of the BD Employee s upcoming OTR with NYSER. After the BD Employee informed Lodewick that he could not discuss the ongoing 7

investigation and ended the call, Lodewick continued to harass the BD Employee, calling him five additional times over the following two days. First Cause of Action (Fraudulent Kickback Scheme NYSE Rules 2010 and 2020) 30. NYSE Regulation re-alleges and incorporates by reference each preceding paragraph. 31. NYSE Rule 2010 requires that [a] member or member organization, in the conduct of its business, shall observe high standards of commercial honor and just and equitable principles of trade. 32. NYSE Rule 2020 provides that [n]o member or member organization shall effect any transaction in, or induce the purchase or sale of, any security by means of any manipulative, deceptive or other fraudulent device or contrivance. 33. As discussed above, Lodewick knowingly received kickback payments from the BD Employee in return for routing order flow to the BD to execute certain customer trades, as well as for introductions to other NYSE floor brokers. Lodewick also knowingly hid and did not disclose these kickbacks. 34. By engaging in an undisclosed kickback scheme with the BD Employee, Lodewick knowingly failed to observe high standards of commercial honor and just and equitable principles of trade, and also effected transactions in securities by means of manipulative, deceptive and fraudulent devices. 35. As a result of the foregoing, Lodewick willfully violated NYSE Rules 2010 and 2020. 8

Second Cause of Action (Failure to Provide Testimony and Documents and Obstruction of the Investigation NYSE Rules 8210 and 2010) paragraph. 36. NYSE Regulation re-alleges and incorporates by reference each preceding 37. NYSE Rule 8210(c) provides that No... covered person shall fail to provide information or testimony or to permit an inspection and copying of books, records, or accounts pursuant to this Rule. 38. At all times during the Relevant Period, Lodewick was a registered representative and associated with Quattro or Mancuso. Accordingly, Lodewick was a covered person as defined by NYSE Rule 9120(g). 39. NYSE Rule 2010 requires that [a] member or member organization, in the conduct of its business, shall observe high standards of commercial honor and just and equitable principles of trade. 40. As discussed above, NYSER took Lodewick s sworn testimony, and requested a range of documents pursuant to NYSE Rule 8210. 41. Lodewick made a number of knowing false statements during his April 10, 2018 OTR, including by directly and falsely testifying that he had never received any payments from any employee of the BD. Lodewick also lied in his OTR when he said he did not text with the BD Employee about business, and he also was not accurate and truthful about the reasons why he was suspended from Quattro (namely, because Mauro became aware of the kickback scheme). 42. Lodewick also failed to produce and/or destroyed a range of documents and evidence responsive to NYSER s request for information, including by deleting his Venmo account and failing to provide his text messages with the BD Employee. 9

43. Moreover, as discussed above, Lodewick also encouraged the BD Employee to mislead NYSER staff by denying that Lodewick had ever received kickbacks. 44. As a result of the foregoing, Lodewick willfully violated NYSE Rules 8210 and 2010. RELIEF REQUESTED WHEREFORE, NYSE Regulation, on behalf of NYSE, respectfully requests that the Panel: A. make findings of facts and conclusions of law that Respondent committed the violations charged and alleged herein, and therefore, subject him to discipline pursuant to NYSE Rules 8310(a) and 8311; B. make specific findings that Lodewick willfully violated NYSE Rules 2010, 2020, and 8210; C. order that one or more of the sanctions provided under NYSE Rule 8310, including, without limitation, a bar be imposed against Lodewick; D. order that the Respondent bears such costs of proceeding as are deemed fair and appropriate under the circumstances in accordance with NYSE Rule 8310; and E. grant all further relief, legal or equitable, that is warranted under the circumstances. 10

Date: July 2, 2018 New York, New York Respectfully submitted, NYSE RegulatirV Ce7 William R. Vanderveer Tony M. Frouge NYSE Regulation, on behalf of New York Stock Exchange LLC New York Stock Exchange 11 Wall Street New York, New York 10005 (t) (212) 656-3073 (f) (212) 656-2027 (e) william.vanderveer@theice.com 11