Workshop 7.1 Linear Structural Analysis

Similar documents
Introduction to ANSYS Mechanical

Abaqus CAE (ver. 6.9) Contact Tutorial

pdfpost Tutorial pdfpost & ANSYS Workbench extension (v3) for starters.

TUTORIAL 4: Combined Axial and Bending Problem Sketch Path Sweep Initial Project Space Setup Static Structural ANSYS

Abaqus Beam Tutorial (ver. 6.12)

Solidworks: Lesson 4 Assembly Basics and Toolbox. UCF Engineering

AutoCAD Inventor - Solid Modeling, Stress and Dynamic Analysis

pdfpost Tutorial pdfpost & ANSYS Workbench extension (v2) for starters.

Lesson 4 Holes and Rounds

Abaqus/CAE (ver. 6.14*) Plate/Shell Tutorial

A study of Vibration Analysis for Gearbox Casing Using Finite Element Analysis

Sheet Metal Punch ifeatures

150 ANSYS Workbench Mechanical

Design and Analysis of Spindle for Oil Country Lathe

Development of a Numerical Technique for the Static Analysis of Bolted Joints by the FEM

Failure of Engineering Materials & Structures. Code 34. Bolted Joint s Relaxation Behavior: A FEA Study. Muhammad Abid and Saad Hussain

Harrison Sprague P15571 Sun Tracker Stress Analysis U-Bracket Stress (Rev 1) Analysis

Introduction to ANSYS SIwave

Stress Analysis of Flanged Joint Using Finite Element Method

News Release for the powerful Rollform Software

Quasi-static Contact Mechanics Problem

Effect of Bolt Layout on the Mechanical Behavior of Four Bolted Shear Joint

AN INNOVATIVE FEA METHODOLOGY FOR MODELING FASTENERS

Note: Conditions where bending loads are imposed on the bolt e.g. non-parallel bolting surfaces, should be avoided.

Model Correlation of Dynamic Non-linear Bearing Behavior in a Generator

Design Analysis, Simulation and Fabrication of Spur Gear Cutting Attachment for Lathe Machine

MECHANICAL ASSEMBLY John Wiley & Sons, Inc. M. P. Groover, Fundamentals of Modern Manufacturing 2/e

1/2/2016. Lecture Slides. Screws, Fasteners, and the Design of Nonpermanent Joints. Reasons for Non-permanent Fasteners

UNIVERSITY OF THESSALY

On completion of this exercise you will have:

Fluid-Structure Interaction (FSI) with System Coupling

3-D Finite Element Analysis of Bolted Joint Using Helical Thread Model

Electromagnetic, Thermal and Structural Analysis of the LUX Photoinjector Cavity using ANSYS. Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab

CATIA-5 PART-B: 3D CAD, Mechanisms and Finite Element Analysis

Basic Features. In this lesson you will learn how to create basic CATIA features. Lesson Contents: CATIA V5 Fundamentals- Lesson 3: Basic Features

Dimension Properties. Student Web Site

Pro/E WILDFIRE, week6

Finite Element Analysis of Multi-Fastened Bolted Joint Connecting Composite Components in Aircraft Structures

System Coupling 14.0 Twoway FSI with ANSYS FLUENT and ANSYS Mechanical

Chapter 3: Multi Domain - a servo mechanism

Revit Structure 2012 Basics:

Engineering Technology

1. Enumerate the most commonly used engineering materials and state some important properties and their engineering applications.

CETOL 6σ Tutorial. For Pro/Engineer and Creo Parametric. The table. CETOL 6σ / ProE. Page 1

EXPERIMENT NUMBER 10 TRANSIENT ANALYSIS USING PSPICE

Sheet Metal OverviewChapter1:

BOLTCALC Program. problems. User Guide. Software for the Analysis of Bolted Joints

The Behaviour Of Round Timber Sections Notched Over The Support On The Tension Face. Justin Dewey

SOLIDWORKS 2015 and Engineering Graphics

Generative Drafting Overview What's New Getting Started User Tasks

IJSRD - International Journal for Scientific Research & Development Vol. 4, Issue 05, 2016 ISSN (online):

Prasanth. Lathe Machining

Sheet Metal OverviewChapter1:

Product Modelling in Solid Works

Design and Analysis of Progressive Die for Chain Link Plate

Getting Started Guide

EFFECT OF YARN CROSS-SECTIONAL SHAPES AND CRIMP ON THE MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF 3D WOVEN COMPOSITES

Autodesk Inventor 2016

Applied Precast Concrete Detailing

ME Week 2 Project 2 Flange Manifold Part

DESIGN AND ANALYSIS OF FORM TOOL

Magnitude and Phase Measurements. Analog Discovery

ERECTION & CONSTRUCTION

Finite-Element-Analysis of Mechanical Characteristics of RTM-Tools

Guide Pulley System [GPS]

ANALYSIS OF FATIGUE STRESS IN A HERTZIAN FORM. Prof.dr.eng. Stefan GHIMIŞI, Constantin Brâncuşi University of Târgu Jiu

Shot Peening Small Holes By Bill Barker PROGRESSIVE TECHNOLOGIES

Consideration of Tool Chamfer for Realistic Application of the Incremental Hole-Drilling Method

Introduction to Autodesk Inventor for F1 in Schools (Australian Version)

and Engineering Graphics

Studies on free vibration of FRP aircraft Instruments panel boards

SDC. SolidWorks Tutorial 2001Plus. A Competency Project Based Approach Utilizing 3D Solid Modeling. David C. Planchard & Marie P.

Chair. Bottom Rail. on the Command Manager. on the Weldments toolbar.

AEROPLANE. Create a New Folder in your chosen location called Aeroplane. The four parts that make up the project will be saved here.

TANGENTIAL STRESS FACTOR COMPUTATION IN POINT MOUNTED STRUCTURAL GLASS

Assemble This! [Part 1]

When you complete this assignment you will:

Engineering Design Representation. Use of 2D drawing format: Typical Design Annotation. Standardization. Extracted drawings. General dimensions

Designing in the context of an assembly

DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A Approved for Public Release Distribution Unlimited

Prismatic Machining Preparation Assistant

Typical Group D Rear Acoustical Cover Installation

Lab 15: Lock in amplifier (Version 1.4)

Vectorworks Architect

Interference Fits Interference Fits Reference Lecture 15 Notes

FAST VISUALISATION OF SAFETY MARGINS OF THE W7-X PLASMA VESSEL

Part 8: The Front Cover

[Use Element Selection tool to move raster towards green block.]

Revit Structure 2013 Basics

Autodesk Inventor Drawing Manager Tips & Tricks

Reinforcement with Soil Nails

RIVETING Rivet types Solid rivets Solid rivets are used less and less. They have been replaced in many cases by welding or bonding.

- INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS -

Module 2.1, 2.2 Review. EF101 Analysis & Skills Module 2.3. Sketched Features and Operations. On-line Help Two Locations

Bolt Material Types and Grades 1- Bolts made of carbon steel and alloy steel: 4.6, 4.8, 5.6, 5.8, 6.8, 8.8, 10.9 Nuts made of carbon steel and alloy

Rigidity and Dynamic Analysis of Lathe Bed

A Hybrid Trailing Edge Control Surface Concept

Below are the desired outcomes and usage competencies based on the completion of Project 4.

Double Shear Testing of Bolts

Installing the Partridge RA Extension on Losmandy G11

Transcription:

Workshop 7.1 Linear Structural Analysis 16.0 Release Introduction to ANSYS Mechanical 1 2015 ANSYS, Inc. September 15, 2015

Goals Workshop 7.1 consists of a 5 part assembly representing an impeller type pump. Our primary goals are to analyze the assembly with a load on the belt of 100N to test: That the impeller will not deflect more than 0.075mm with the applied load. That the use of a plastic pump housing will not exceed the material s elastic limits around the shaft bore. 2 2015 ANSYS, Inc. September 15, 2015

Assumptions We ll assume the pump housing is rigidly mounted to the rest of the pump assembly. To simulate this, a frictionless support is applied to the mounting face. Similarly, frictionless surfaces on the mounting hole counter bores will be used to simulate the mounting bolt contacts. (Note if accurate stresses were desired at the mounting holes, a compression only support would be a better choice). Finally, a bearing load (X = 100 N) is used on the pulley to simulate the load from the drive belt. The bearing load will distribute the force over the face of the pulley only where the belt contact occurs. 3 2015 ANSYS, Inc. September 15, 2015

Project Schematic 1. From the Toolbox insert a Static Structural system into the Project Schematic. 2. From the Geometry cell, RMB and Import Geometry > Browse. Import the file Pump_assy_3.stp. 1. 2. 3. Double click the Model cell to start the Mechanical application. 3. 4 2015 ANSYS, Inc. September 15, 2015

Preprocessing 4. On the toolbar within the ANSYS Mechanical environment, select Units, and change the system s unit to Metric (mm, kg, N, s, mv, ma) (Note material data is not being checked but it is good practice to confirm units) 5. Add Polyethylene the Engineering Data (return to Workbench window): a. Double click the Engineering Data cell. b. Activate the Engineering Data Sources toggle and highlight General Materials and click the + sign next to Polyethylene. c. Return to Project by closing down Engineering Data. 5a. 5c. 5b. 5 2015 ANSYS, Inc. September 15, 2015

... Preprocessing 6. Refresh the Model cell: a. RMB > Refresh. Return to the Mechanical window. 7. Change the material on the pump housing: a. Highlight PumpHousing under geometry. b. From details change the material assignment to Polyethylene. 7a. 7b. 6 2015 ANSYS, Inc. September 15, 2015

... Preprocessing 8. Change the contact region behavior for one of the contact regions (shown below): a. Hold the shift key and highlight all the contacts, and RMB>Rename Based on Definition. b. From the detail window change the contact type to no separation for the contact PumpHousing to Shaft The remainder of the contacts will be left as bonded (all default contact condition is set to bonded). 7 2015 ANSYS, Inc. September 15, 2015

Environment 9. Apply the bearing load to the pulley: a. Highlight the Static Structural branch. b. Highlight the pulley s groove surface. c. RMB > Insert > Bearing Load. d. From the detail window change to Components and X = 100 N 8 2015 ANSYS, Inc. September 15, 2015

... Environment 10. Apply supports to the assembly: a. Highlight the mating face on the pump housing (part 1). b. RMB > Insert > Frictionless Support. 9 2015 ANSYS, Inc. September 15, 2015

... Environment Now we will add the frictionless supports to the 8 countersink portions of the mounting holes (shown here). Each of the required surfaces could be selected individually while holding the CTRL key. However, this could be accomplished more swiftly with the use of either Named Selections or macro 10 2015 ANSYS, Inc. September 15, 2015

... Environment 11. Select any one of the countersunk holes: a. RMB, choose Create Named Selection. b. Under Apply geometry items of same, check box for size c. Click ok d. RMB on Static Structural and insert a Frictionless Support e. In the details window switch Scoping Method to Named Selection f. Under Named Selection switch to Selection 11f. 11a. 11b. If the user used this approach, go directly to step 13 (slide 14). Alternative, if the user decides to take the macro approach, continue to the next slide. 11 2015 ANSYS, Inc. September 15, 2015

... Environment (Alternatively) 11. Rather than using Named Selections, the selection can be accomplished by size macro: a. Highlight 1 of the countersink surfaces (arbitrary). b. Choose Tools > Run Macro... and browse to: C:\Program Files\ANSYS Inc\v160\aisol\DesignSpace\DSPages\macros c. In the browser choose selectbysize.js d. Click Open 11a. 11c. 12 2015 ANSYS, Inc. September 15, 2015 11d.

... Environment Constrain the countersunk hole surfaces: 12. From the context menu, click on Supports and choose Frictionless Support or RMB > Insert > Frictionless Support 13 2015 ANSYS, Inc. September 15, 2015

Solution 13. Highlight the Analysis Settings and from the details window change Weak Springs from Program Controlled to Off. 13. Note : Because of the presence of frictionless supports and non bonded contact, Workbench-Mechanical will trigger the use of weak springs during the solution. If we know the model is fully constrained we can turn off this function. 14. Solve the model: Choose solve from the tool bar or RMB Solution branch and choose Solve. 14 2015 ANSYS, Inc. September 15, 2015

Postprocessing 15. Add results to solution: a. Highlight the solution branch: b. From the context menu, choose Stress > Equivalent (von-mises) or RMB > Insert > Stress > Equivalent (von-mises) c. Repeat the step above, choose Deformation > Total Deformation Solve again. Note: adding results and re-solving the model will not cause a complete solution to take place. Requesting new results requires only a re-read of the results file. Alternatively, the requested results can be process by RMB on Solutions and pick Evaluate All Results options 15 2015 ANSYS, Inc. September 15, 2015

... Postprocessing While the overall plots can be used as a reality check to verify our loads, the plots are less than ideal since much of the model is displayed in few colors. (your results may vary slightly due to meshing differences). To improve the quality of results available we will scope results to individual parts. 16 2015 ANSYS, Inc. September 15, 2015

... Postprocessing 16. Scope the results to individual bodies/surfaces: a. Highlight the Solution branch and switch the selection filter to Body select mode. b. Select the impeller (part 2) c. RMB > Insert > Stress > equivalent (von- Mises) 16a. 16b. Notice the detail for the new result indicates a scope of 1 Body. Now the local variation in the results are more visually distinct. 17. Repeat the procedure above to insert Total Deformation results for the impeller part. 18. Repeat to add individually scoped stress and total deformation results to the pump housing (part 1). 17 2015 ANSYS, Inc. September 15, 2015

... Postprocessing 19. To give physically meaningful names to the result objects, it is useful to rename the new results: a. Highlight all results > RMB > Rename Based on Definition. The result objects should now contain more informative names 20. Evaluate All Results 19 18 2015 ANSYS, Inc. September 15, 2015

... Postprocessing By checking the impeller deformation we can verify that one of our goals is met. The maximum deformation is approximately 0.028mm (goal < 0.075mm). 19 2015 ANSYS, Inc. September 15, 2015

... Postprocessing Inspection of the housing stress shows that, overall, the stress levels are below the material s elastic limit (tensile yield = 25 MPa). We could again use scoping to isolate the results in the area of interest. 20 2015 ANSYS, Inc. September 15, 2015

Examining stress results The stress results are often not as smooth as the deformation results, this is due to the fact that the displacement field is continuous across the nodes whereas the stress is not. Therefore the stress results can fluctuate. By default ANSYS takes the averaged stress result to reduce the fluctuation Averaged VS Un-averaged 21 2015 ANSYS, Inc. September 15, 2015

Go further! The Mesh of the bodies is very coarse In order to get more physical results, the user must change the mesh. Here s a suggestion of mesh: 22 2015 ANSYS, Inc. September 15, 2015

... Go further! The user can now re-examine the results: 23 2015 ANSYS, Inc. September 15, 2015

... Go further! 24 2015 ANSYS, Inc. September 15, 2015