Korean Geodetic Datum 2002(KGD2002): Nationwide GPS Network Densification

Similar documents
Table of Contents. Frequently Used Abbreviation... xvii

Multipath Error Detection Using Different GPS Receiver s Antenna

Lecture 14 NAD 83(NSRS), NAD 83(CORS 96), WGS84 and ITRF

The IEODO THEFIRSTRESULTS OFANALYSINGGPS OBSERVATIONS AT IEODO OCEAN RESEARCH STATION IN KOREA

Lecture 16 NAD 83 (1986), NAD 83(1993) and NAD 83 (NSRS 2007) 10 March 2009 GISC3325

Performance of Research-Based N-RTK Positioning System in ISKANDAR Malaysia

Chapter 6 GPS Relative Positioning Determination Concepts

Utilizing A GNSS Network Solution for Utility Applications

Asian Journal of Science and Technology Vol. 08, Issue, 11, pp , November, 2017 RESEARCH ARTICLE

The Performance of RTK GPS Mapping In Urban Environments

From Passive to Active Control Point Networks Evaluation of Accuracy in Static GPS Surveying

New Tools for Network RTK Integrity Monitoring

PROCEDURE FOR GNSS EQUIPMENT VERIFICATION IN STATIC POSITIONING

Positioning by an Active GPS System: Experimental Investigation of the Attainable Accuracy. Werner LIENHART, Andreas WIESER, Fritz K.

Low-cost densification of permanent GPS networks for natural hazard mitigation: First tests on GSI s GEONET network

Standard for the Australian Survey Control Network

Jun CHEN. Differential GNSS positioning with low-cost receivers. Background. Objective: Methods:

Salient Feature of ITRF. Realization of Dubai Emirate Datum. Reference Frame 2000 (Ditr 2000)

National Report of Greece to EUREF 2009

SURVEYORS BOARD OF QUEENSLAND. RTK GNSS for Cadastral Surveys. Guideline

Ionospheric Correction and Ambiguity Resolution in DGPS with Single Frequency

Global IGS/GPS Contribution to ITRF

SIRGAS: the geodetic reference frame for Latin America and the Caribbean

Session 1.2 Regional and National Reference Systems. Asia Pacific. Dr John Dawson Leader - National Geodesy Program Geoscience Australia

PageNET: In Support of the Surveying Community

A NEW GEOCENTRIC DATUM FOR NEW ZEALAND

Philippine Geodetic Infrastructure Status, Challenges and Future Direction

The realization of a 3D Reference System

Testing a Real Time Kinematic Service System Using FM DARC for the Nationwide DGPS Network in Korea

CGG. Office of the Surveyor General of the Federation Federal Capital Territory, Abuja, Nigeria 2

Trimble Business Center:

GPS Geodetic Reference System WGS 84

Impact of Different Tropospheric Models on GPS Baseline Accuracy: Case Study in Thailand

Applications, Products and Services of GPS Technology

GNSS CORS in the Pacific

Who s heard of the GDA2020?

Record 2013/01 GeoCat 75057

APPLICATION OF MARINE GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM USING ANALYSIS OF CONTROL POINTS IN POST PROCESSING DGPS SURVEYING

Record 2011/02. GeoCat # M. Jia, J. Dawson APPLYING GEOSCIENCE TO AUSTR ALIA S MOST IMPORTANT CHALLENGES

What makes the positioning infrastructure work. Simon Kwok Chairman, Land Surveying Division Hong Kong Institute of Surveyors

Testing RTK GPS Horizontal Positioning Accuracy within an Urban Area

Accuracy assessment of free web-based online GPS Processing services and relative GPS solution software

The International Scene: How Precise Positioning Will Underpin Critical GNSS Applications

International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 6, Issue 8, August ISSN

Procedures for Quality Control of GNSS Surveying Results Based on Network RTK Corrections.

GNSS & Coordinate Systems

Assessment of the Accuracy of Processing GPS Static Baselines Up To 40 Km Using Single and Dual Frequency GPS Receivers.

Presentation Plan. The Test of Processing Modules of Global Positioning System (GPS) Softwares by Using Products of International GPS Service (IGS)

Determination of GDA94 coordinates for station PDM1 at BMA s Peak Downs Mine in central Queensland using the June 2013 GPS data set

Record 2013/06 GeoCat 75084

Record 2012/76 GeoCat 74975

Specifications for Post-Earthquake Precise Levelling and GNSS Survey. Version 1.0 National Geodetic Office

Determination of GDA94 coordinates for eight stations of Ultimate Positioning Group Pty Ltd using the May 2013 GPS data set

Application of GNSS Methods for Monitoring Offshore Platform Deformation

FieldGenius Technical Notes GPS Terminology

AN AUSTRALIAN PILOT PROJECT FOR A REAL TIME KINEMATIC GPS NETWORK USING THE VIRTUAL REFERENCE STATION CONCEPT

Supporting GNSS applications in Latin America through the SIRGAS reference frame

The Design and Philosophy of the Tunneling Survey for the Klang Valley Underground Mass Rapid Transit Project

Status and new perspectives of the SIRGAS Reference Frame

Introduction to Datums James R. Clynch February 2006

Using RTK GNSS Wisely

SERVIR: The Portuguese Army CORS Network for RTK

Improved Ambiguity Resolution by an Equatorial Ionospheric Differential Correction for Precise Positioning

Compensation of Time Alignment Error in Heterogeneous GPS Receivers

Geodetic Reference Frame Theory

The Role of F.I.G. in Leading the Development of International Real-Time Positioning Guidelines

Effect of Quasi Zenith Satellite (QZS) on GPS Positioning

DYNAMIC RT TECHNOLOGY

COMPARISON OF GPS COMMERCIAL SOFTWARE PACKAGES TO PROCESSING STATIC BASELINES UP TO 30 KM

Principles of the Global Positioning System Lecture 19

EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS OF LEX CORRECTIONS USING FARMING MACHINE

One Source for Positioning Success

National report of Ukraine

GPS for crustal deformation studies. May 7, 2009

AUSPOS GPS Processing Report

SIRGAS: BASIS FOR GEOSCIENCES, GEODATA, AND NAVIGATION IN LATIN AMERICA

Terrestrial Reference Frame of Serbia and its temporal rate

GNSS Application trends in Central Asia

Performance Evaluation of Multiple Reference Station GPS RTK for a Medium Scale Network

Performance Analysis of GPS Integer Ambiguity Resolution Using External Aiding Information

Datum Transformations: Nightmare on GIS Street. Agenda

GUIDANCE NOTES FOR GNSS NETWORK RTK SURVEYING IN GREAT BRITAIN

Precise positioning in Europe using the Galileo and GPS combination

Connecting a Cadastral Survey to PNG94 using GNSS

Impact of Baseline Distance and Interstation Height Difference On the Accuracy of GPS- Derived Station Coordinates

MULTIPATH MITIGATION BY WAVELET ANALYSIS FOR GPS BASE STATION APPLICATIONS

Accuracy Testing of RTK Service of the Permanent Station Network in the Republic of Serbia

ABSTRACT: Three types of portable units with GNSS raw data recording capability are assessed to determine static and kinematic position accuracy

Rapid static GNSS data processing using online services

GROUND CONTROL SURVEY REPORT

Some of the proposed GALILEO and modernized GPS frequencies.

Exploiting the high precision capabilities of the Hellenic Positioning System - HEPOS

Integrated Quality Indicators and Stochastic Modelling for Real-Time Positioning: Overview and Implementation

Determination of GDA94 coordinates for eighteen C.R. Kennedy Survey Solutions stations using the July and August 2011 GPS data set

An improvement of GPS height estimations: stochastic modeling

GPS for. Land Surveyors. Jan Van Sickle. Fourth Edition. CRC Press. Taylor & Francis Group. Taylor & Francis Croup, an Informa business

Unification of height systems in the frame of GGOS

Determination of GDA94 coordinates for fifteen CORSnet-NSW stations using the October 2012 GPS data sets

DETERMINATION OF VERTICAL DATUM LEVEL FOR TIDAL BENCH MARK USING GNSS BUOY OBSERVATIONS

A Positon and Orientation Post-Processing Software Package for Land Applications - New Technology

Transcription:

Korean Geodetic Datum 2002(KGD2002): Nationwide GPS Network Densification Young-Jin LEE, Hung-Kyu LEE, Kwang-Ho JEONG, and Sang-Hun CHA, Republic of Korea Key words: KGD2002, GPS, Network Densification, Adjustment Computation SUMMARY South Korea has adopted new geocentric geodetic datum (KGD2002) on the 1 st January 2003. For this realization, both very long baseline interferometry(vlbi) and GPS technique were used to determine the coordinates of the 1 st order national geodetic reference network consisting of 14 GPS CORSs (Continuous Operating Reference Stations). The coordinate determination was based on the International Terrestrial Reference Frame 2000 with the reference epoch of 2002.0. Subsequently, as the first phase of the geodetic network densification, the 2 nd order network adjustment was performed in 2006. Therefore, it is necessary to implement the second phase of the datum densification by adjusting the 3 rd order geodetic network comprising about 11,000 points. This network has been observed by GPS from 1997 to 2007. This paper describes details of the network adjustment strategy and procedure adopted in the second phase of the KGD2002 densification. This is followed by presenting recent results of the 3rd order network adjustment, indicating that the accuracy of the adjusted coordinates is better than 1cm and 2cm in horizontal and vertical components, respectively. 1/12

Korean Geodetic Datum 2002(KGD2002): Nationwide GPS Network Densification Young-Jin LEE, Hung-Kyu LEE, Kwang-Ho JEONG and Sang-Hun CHA, Republic of Korea 1. INTRODUCTION According to the revision of the Survey ACT, the Korean geodetic datum was superseded by the new global geodetic datum, Korean Geodetic Datum 2002 - KGD2002, from 1 st January 2003. This datum transition supports modern satellite positioning technologies and ensures that the national spatial data is compatible with the international standard. The KGD2002 is a global geocentric system in which coordinates are aligned to the International Terrestrial Reference Frame 2000(ITRF 2000) with reference epoch of 1st January 2002 (Epoch 2002.0). This was achieved by determining the coordinates of the datum origin and the 1 st order national geodetic control points consisting of 14 GPS Continuous Operating Stations(CORS) through very long baseline interferometry(vlbi) and GPS observations processing. The VLBI observation was conducted through Joint Geodetic Project of Korea and Japan in 1995, and the measurement was sent to NASA to connect to the IVS network on 14th November, 2000. The adjusted coordinates from this work is based on ITRF 2000 with reference epoch of 1997.0. From 17th to 26th January 2002, GPS baseline survey and five geodimeter observations were carried out from the VLBI stations to the datum origin marker. Through these procedures, the coordinates of origin of KGD 2002 was determined with the reference epoch of 2002.0. Hence, the origin coordinates were updated by including the vector of the crustal motion from 1997.0 to 2002.0. The Korean geodetic network comprises three hierarchical levels, such as the 1st, 2nd and 3 rd order control points. The 1 st order network is comprised of 14 GPS CORSs, and all the points of the 2 nd order network were re-surveyed by GPS from 1996 to 2000. On the other hand, the 3 rd order control network is heterogeneous in that both of GPS and EDM were used in the observations. Figure 1-1 presents the adjusted 2 nd order network with absolute confidence regions. As mentioned at the beginning of this section, the KGD2002 coordinates of the 1 st order control points were made during the new datum realization. A nationwide network adjustment was carried out in 2006 so as to densifiy the KGD2002 by determine the KGD2002 coordinates of the 2 nd and 3 rd order control points (Lee, et al., 2006 & 2007). After then, NGII(National Geographical Information Institute of Korea) had performed GPS campaign at the 2,123 points for homogenizing the 3 rd order network from 2006 to 2007, which leads to adjust the 3 rd order geodetic control network. Hence, the main purpose of this project is to adjust the 2nd and the 3rd order networks so as to determine the KGD2002 coordinates. This paper focuses on describing issues related with the 3 rd order GPS network adjustment for the densification of the new Korean geodetic datum. After presenting the overall adjustment procedure, a brief description of GPS observations and their baseline processing is given. As 2/12

the main part of this paper, results of the 3rd order network adjustment are detailed in sequence. Special emphasis will be given to discuss on the quality control, stochastic modelling, and network accuracy. Figure 1-1. Adjusted network with absolute confidence regions (Lee et al., 2006 & 2007) 3/12

Baseline Vectors & VCV Matrices Mimaly Constraned Adjutm entof "C am paign Network" Results Acceptable? (Tau Test) Trableshooting Mimaly Constraned Adjutm entof "B lock Network" Results Acceptable? (Tau Test) Trableshooting Em pirical Stochatic Modeling Over-Constrained Adjustm ent (Applying M odified Stochastic M odel) Figure 2-1. The 3 rd order network adjustment flow 2. THE NETWORK ADJUSTMENT PROCEDURE Figure 2-1 illustrates details on the procedure of the 3 rd order network adjustment procedure. The adjustment began with minimally constrained adjustments with respect to each of the 81 campaign networks to detect outliers and ensure the quality of each network. After that, 20 block networks were constructed as shown in Figure 2-2 and each block network was successively adjusted with minimally constrained technique instead of considering a single nationwide network. After detecting and removing outliers from the observation files, the empirical stochastic modelling techniques were applied to determine the magnitude of absolute and relative errors of the GPS baseline vectors. Finally, the over constrained adjustments were performed, in sequence, with respect to each of the block networks. In these block network adjustments, not only the 2 nd order control points, but also the 3 rd order control points, were overlapped by adjacent networks whose coordinates had been determined from preceding adjustments to avoid a dual coordinate estimation on the overlapped control points. 4/12

Figure 2-2. Composition of block networks 3. GPS OBSERVATIONS AND PROCESSING The National Geographical Information Institute (NGII) of Korea together with a number of surveying contractors had held GPS observation campaign over the 3 rd order geodetic network from 1997 to 2007. During these campaigns, about 10,000 points were observed. The Korean specification for GPS control surveying was applied for the observations so that the campaigns could achieve high levels of surveying efficiency and accuracy. The baseline length and GPS receiver occupation time was mostly 2 to 5km and 4 hours, respectively. All the GPS data was initially processed by the surveying contractors, who made filed observations. Therefore, a number of different commercial software was used. However, in the case of GPS short baseline up to 10km, processing results are almost identical regardless which software is used. This is because applying the double-differencing technique to the GPS observation significantly reduce or even eliminate common error sources between a 5/12

reference and a rover receiver. Hence, for this project, the processed baseline vectors, together with their variance-covariance (VCV) matrices, will be used in the subsequent adjustment unless significant problems (e.g., incorrect antenna heights and/or reference coordinates) exist. Figure 3-1 shows an example of the adjusted block. Figure 3-1. An example of the adjusted block Network (i.e., 2007-TG1, 180 points) 4. MINIMALLY CONSTRAINED ADJUSTMENT Campaign network adjustments were carried out by fixing a single point of the 2 nd order control point. They were performed with respect to all of the 81 campaign networks. After removing all the baselines identified as outliers, block adjustments were performed network by network. In these block adjustments a single 2 nd order control point was held fixed. From the two different levels of the minimally constrained adjustments, a total of 108 baselines were detected as outliers and were removed from the input data files. Table 4-1 shows the number of baselines detected and removed from the two levels of adjustments. The empirical stochastic modelling scheme was applied to the selected campaign network in which GPS observations were processed by both LGO(Leica Geo Office) and TGO (Trimble Geomatics Office) static data processing modules. This process made it possible to determine that the magnitude of the absolute and relative error was 5mm + 0.5PPM and 10mm + 1PPM for the horizontal and vertical component, respectively. 6/12

Table 4-1. Results of outlier detection and identification procedure Num. Number of outlier Num. Block Block Number of outlier of of Name Points Campaign Block Total Name Points Campaign Block Total 1997-L 241 5 1 6 2004-2T 1,057 0 0 0 1998-L 435 4 2 6 2004-L 824 4 6 10 1999-L 292 1 1 3 2004UR-L 43 0 0 0 2000-L 430 12 0 12 2005-T 820 0 1 1 2001-L 1,117 5 10 15 2005-L 1,062 5 6 11 2002-1T 569 0 0 0 2005JJ-L 194 0 0 0 2002-2T 792 3 0 3 2006-1 400 6 3 9 2003-1T 702 1 2 3 2007-1 1,074 13 2 15 2003-2T 1,192 1 0 1 2007-2 469 4 2 6 2004-1T 1,004 3 5 8 2007-SA 180 4 0 0 Table 4-2. Summary of difference between the adjusted and predetermined 2 nd order control points within the block network (unit: m) Component Mean RMS Maximum Minimum Horizontal 0.036 0.044 0.108 0.004 Vertical 0.038 0.048 0.148 0.001 After modifying all of the original VCV matrices using the determined values, all the block networks were readjusted by fixing a single point. In order to examine the block networks overall accuracy, a comparison of the adjusted coordinates to the predetermined 2 nd order control points was made and tabulated in Table 4-2. It was evaluated from these results that the absolute accuracy of the adjusted coordinates averaged 3.6cm in the horizontal and 3.8cm in the vertical component. Relative confidences showing internal accuracy of 16 regions with respect to 95% probability were computed from the estimated parameters VCV matrix and their statistical summaries are given in Table 4-3. It is found from the results that the average values were better than 1cm and 2cm in the horizontal and vertical components, respectively. 7/12

Table 4-3. Statistical summary of absolute confidence regions with 95% probability (unit: m) Block Comp. Mean Std. Max. Block Comp. Mean Std Max. 1997-L 1998-L 1999-L 2000-L 2001-L 2002-1T 2002-2T 2003-1T Hor. 0.006 0.001 0.011 Hor. 0.006 0.001 0.011 2004-2T Ver. 0.014 0.003 0.026 Ver. 0.013 0.002 0.026 Hor. 0.006 0.001 0.009 Hor. 0.006 0.001 0.011 2004-L Ver. 0.013 0.002 0.020 Ver. 0.014 0.002 0.026 Hor. 0.006 0.001 0.009 Hor. 0.006 0.001 0.008 2004UR-L Ver. 0.013 0.002 0.021 Ver. 0.014 0.002 0.018 Hor. 0.006 0.002 0.025 Hor. 0.006 0.001 0.009 2005-T Ver. 0.013 0.004 0.056 Ver. 0.014 0.002 0.020 Hor. 0.006 0.002 0.028 Hor. 0.006 0.001 0.009 2005-L Ver. 0.014 0.003 0.064 Ver. 0.013 0.002 0.021 Hor. 0.006 0.001 0.010 Hor. 0.007 0.001 0.012 2005JJ-L Ver. 0.014 0.002 0.023 Ver. 0.015 0.002 0.027 Hor. 0.006 0.001 0.020 Hor. 0.012 0.003 0.019 2006-1 Ver. 0.014 0.003 0.045 Ver. 0.027 0.006 0.043 Hor. 0.006 0.001 0.020 Hor. 0.007 0.002 0.015 2007-1 Ver. 0.013 0.002 0.023 Ver. 0.016 0.004 0.034 5. OVER CONSTRAINED ADJUSTMENT The final stage of the order network adjustment for determining the KGD2002 coordinate sets, over constrained adjustments were successively performed with respect to the 20 block networks. In these adjustments, all available 2 nd order control points within the block network, and the 3 rd order control points, overlapped with adjacent networks whose coordinates had been estimated from a preceding block network adjustment. This approach avoids the repetitious estimation of the overlapped points between two adjacent block networks. The series of over constrained adjustments estimated KGD 2002 coordinate sets of 10,867 control points. Table 5-1 shows the order of the block network adjustment, the number of baselines and the points adjusted. Table 5-2 shows the absolute confidence regions with respect to 95% probability from the final over constrained adjustments of 3 rd order network. These results indicate that the absolute accuracy of the estimated coordinates of the 3 rd order points averaged better than 1cm and 2cm in the horizontal and vertical components, respectively. However, it is important to note that this accuracy does not reflect the uncertainty of the 2 nd order points fixed in the adjustments 8/12

Table 5-1. Summary of over constrained adjustments Adjust. Order Block Number of points Number of baselines Adjust. Order Block Number of points Number of baselines 1 2003-2T 1,292 5,055 11 1998-L 435 1,790 2 2004-2T 1,057 3,936 12 2001-L 1,116 4,024 3 2004-L 824 2,800 13 1999-L 291 1,139 4 2005-L 1,062 3,852 14 1997-L 240 1,657 5 2005-T 820 2,863 15 2004UR-L 32 83 6 2004-1T 1,004 3,893 16 2005JJ-L 188 606 7 2003-1T 902 3,527 17 2007-1 1,074 3,806 8 2002-1T 569 2,155 18 2007-2 469 1,475 9 2000-L 430 1,657 19 2006-1 400 1,284 10 2002-2T 794 2,816 20 2007-SA 180 447 Table 5-2. Statistical summary of absolute confidence regions (95%) Block Comp. Mean Std. Max. Block Comp. Mean Std Max. Hor. 0.006 0.001 0.011 Hor. 0.007 0.001 0.011 1997-L 2004-2T Ver. 0.023 0.003 0.026 Ver. 0.015 0.003 0.026 1998-L 1999-L 2000-L 2001-L 2002-1T 2002-2T 2003-1T 2003-2T 2004-1T Hor. 0.007 0.002 0.009 Hor. 0.006 0.001 0.011 2004-L Ver. 0.016 0.004 0.020 Ver. 0.015 0.003 0.026 Hor. 0.007 0.002 0.009 Hor. 0.006 0.001 0.008 2004UR-L Ver. 0.015 0.004 0.021 Ver. 0.015 0.003 0.018 Hor. 0.008 0.003 0.025 Hor. 0.006 0.001 0.009 2005-T Ver. 0.017 0.007 0.056 Ver. 0.014 0.002 0.020 Hor. 0.007 0.002 0.028 Hor. 0.006 0.001 0.009 2005-L Ver. 0.017 0.005 0.064 Ver. 0.015 0.003 0.021 Hor. 0.006 0.001 0.010 Hor. 0.007 0.004 0.012 2005JJ-L Ver. 0.015 0.003 0.023 Ver. 0.016 0.009 0.027 Hor. 0.007 0.002 0.020 Hor. 0.009 0.002 0.020 2006-1 Ver. 0.016 0.004 0.045 Ver. 0.021 0.005 0.047 Hor. 0.006 0.001 0.020 Hor. 0.006 0.002 0.019 2007-1 Ver. 0.014 0.003 0.023 Ver. 0.014 0.005 0.043 Hor. 0.006 0.001 0.015 Hor. 0.004 0.001 0.010 2007-2 Ver. 0.014 0.003 0.024 Ver. 0.009 0.002 0.023 Hor. 0.006 0.001 0.012 Hor. 0.008 0.002 0.017 2007-SA Ver. 0.014 0.003 0.027 Ver. 0.019 0.005 0.039 9/12

6. CONCLUDING REMARKS In order to keep in pace with international trend, to support modern space geodetic technologies and ensure that the national spatial data are compatible with the international standard, the Tokyo datum which had been used in Korea was superseded by the new geocentric datum (e.g., KGD2002) from 1st January 2003. The new datum was realized by determining the coordinates of the datum origin and the 1 st order national geodetic control points consisting of 14 GPS Continuous Operating Stations (CORS) through very long baseline interferometry (VLBI) and GPS observations processing. This paper describes issues related with nationwide GPS network adjustment for the 2 nd phase of the densification of the new Korean geodetic datum (e.g., the 3 rd order GPS network adjustment). First of all, general procedure of the GPS network adjustment was outlined. This was followed by giving a brief description of GPS observations and their baseline processing. Both of minimally and over constrained adjustment were performed to derive new KGD2002 coordinate sets for the 3 rd order geodetic control points. It was possible from the results to conclude that the accuracy of the estimated coordinates is was better than 1cm and 2cm in horizontal and vertical component, respectively. In order to re-establish homogenous geodetic network, NGII has continuously carried out GPS observations over about 1,000 control points since 2008(i.e., blank area in figure 2-2). Once the GPS observations are completed, it is planed to simultaneously perform the 3 rd order network adjustment in year 2008/2009, which leads to supersede the old network established by traditional triangulation techniques. REFERENCE Lee, Y. J., Lee, H. K., Jung, G. H.: Realization of new Korean Geodetic Datum: GPS observation and network adjustment, 12 th IAIN World Congress & 2006 International Symposium on GPS/GNSS (IAIN-GNSS 2006), Jeju, Republic of Korea, 18-20 October 2007. Lee, H. K., Lee, Y. J., Jung, G. H.: Nationawide GPS network adjustment for the densificaiton of Korean Geodetic Datum 2002, Joint International Symposium & Exhibition on Geoinformation 2007 & International Symposium on GPS/GNSS 2007 (ISG-GNSS2007), Johor Bharu, Malaysia, 5-7 November 2007. Leick, A.: Least-Squares Adjustments, Chapter 4 of GPS Satellite Surveying for Positioning, 3rd Edition, John Wiley & Sons, 2004, pp. 92-169. Rizos, C.: Elements of GPS Network Processing, Chapter 9 of Principle and Practice of GPS Surveying, School of Surveying & SIS, University of New South Wales, 1996, pp. 389-442. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT This research was supported by a research grant from National Geographic Information Institute of Korea. 10/12

BIOGRAPHICAL NOTES Prof. Young-Jin Lee is currently a professor in the Department of Construction and Geoinformatics Engineering, Kyungil University (KIU), Republic of Korea. He received B.Sc. and M.Sc. in Surveying Engineering from The University of Seoul, Korea, and Ph.D. in Geomatics Engineering from The Hanyang University, Korea in 1981, 1983 and 1989 respectively. He is a directing member of KASM, KSGPC and KCoS. His experience and research interests include network adjustment and GPS/GNSS applications for surveying & geoinformation system. Dr. Hung-Kyu Lee is currently an assistant professor in the Department of Civil Engineering, Changwon National University (CWNU), Republic of Korea. He received B.Sc. and M.Sc. in Geomatics Engineering from Dong-A University, Korea, and Ph.D. in Satellite Navigation and Geodesy from the School of Surveying and Spatial Information Systems, The University New South Wales (UNSW), Australia in 1998, 2000 and 2004 respectively. His experience and research interests include estimation & quality control algorithms for satellitebased navigation systems and GPS/GNSS applications for surveying & geodesy. Mr. Gwang-Ho Jung is a Ph.D. Candidate in Geomatics Engineering, Kyungil University, Republic of Korea. He received B.Sc. and M.Sc. in Geomatics Engineering from Kyungil University. Mr. Sang-Hun Cha is researcher in Geodetic Division, National Geographic Information Institute, Republic of Korea He received B.Sc. and M.Sc. in Geomatics Engineering from Kyungil University. CONTACTS Prof. Young-Jin Lee Department of Construction and Geoinformatics Engineering, Kyungil University 33 Buhori Hayangup Gyeongsansi, Gyeongbuk REPUBLIC OF KOREA Tel: +82-53-850 7313 Fax: +82-53-850 7611 E-mail: yjlee@kiu.ac.kr Dr. Hung-Kyu Lee Department of Civil Engineering, Changwon National University 9 Sarimdong Changwonsi Gyeongnam REPUBLIC OF KOREA Tel: +82-55-279 7597 Fax: +82-55-285 9491 E-mail: hkyulee@changwon.ac.kr 11/12

Mr. Gwang-Ho Jeong Department of Construction and Geoinformatics Engineering, Kyungil University 33 Buhori Hayangup Gyeongsansi, Gyeongbuk REPUBLIC OF KOREA Tel: +82-53-850 7319 Fax: +82-53-850 7611 E-mail: khjeong@kiu.ac.kr Mr. Sang-Hun Cha Geodetic Division, National Geographic Information Institute 111 Woncheon, Yeongtonggu Suwonsi Gyeonggido REPUBLIC OF KOREA Tel: +82-31-210 2651 Fax: +82-31-210 2756 E-mail: sanghunc@moct.go.kr 12/12