Positron Emission Tomography

Similar documents
Instructions for gg Coincidence with 22 Na. Overview of the Experiment

Gamma Ray Spectroscopy with NaI(Tl) and HPGe Detectors

Electronic Instrumentation for Radiation Detection Systems

PH2510 Nuclear Physics Laboratory Use of Scintillation Counters (NP5)

PMT Calibration in the XENON 1T Demonstrator. Abstract

COMPTON SCATTERING. Purpose. Introduction. Fundamentals of Experiment

Physics Laboratory Scattering of Photons from Electrons: Compton Scattering

Study of Silicon Photomultipliers for Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Application

Cosmic Ray Detector Hardware

Experiment 10. The Speed of Light c Introduction Apparatus

DETECTORS Important characteristics: 1) Wavelength response 2) Quantum response how light is detected 3) Sensitivity 4) Frequency of response

Ph 3324 The Scintillation Detector and Gamma Ray Spectroscopy

Scintillators as an external trigger for cathode strip chambers

ORTEC Experiment 13. Gamma-Gamma Coincidence with Angular Correlation. Equipment Required

Testing the Electronics for the MicroBooNE Light Collection System

LIFETIME OF THE MUON

CHAPTER 7 MEDICINE IMAGING DEVICES

Scintillation Counters

The Influence of Crystal Configuration and PMT on PET Time-of-Flight Resolution

Cosmic Ray Muon Detection

Atomic and Nuclear Physics

The Light Amplifier Concept

CHAPTER 8 GENERIC PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Photomultiplier Tube

Final Report Data Acquisition Box

Physics Experiment N -17. Lifetime of Cosmic Ray Muons with On-Line Data Acquisition on a Computer

EXPERIMENT 5. SCINTILLATION COUNTING AND QUENCH CORRECTION.

and N(t) ~ exp(-t/ ),

PHY 123/253 Shot Noise

Characterization of Silicon Photomultipliers and their Application to Positron Emission Tomography. Zhiwei Yang. Abstract

HF Upgrade Studies: Characterization of Photo-Multiplier Tubes

Traditional analog QDC chain and Digital Pulse Processing [1]

1 Purpose of This Lab Exercise:

What s a Counter Plateau. An introduction for the muon Lab


Light Collection. Plastic light guides

Tutors Dominik Dannheim, Thibault Frisson (CERN, Geneva, Switzerland)

Lecture 12 OPTICAL DETECTORS

Radiation Detection Instrumentation

ORTEC Experiment 3. Gamma-Ray Spectroscopy Using NaI(Tl) Equipment Required. Purpose. Gamma Emission

Homework Set 3.5 Sensitive optoelectronic detectors: seeing single photons

GAMMA-GAMMA CORRELATION Latest Revision: August 21, 2007

On the initiation of lightning in thunderclouds (Instrumentation, Supplementary information)

Nuclear Experiment Phys 318/317 Room 208 Instructor Richard Lindgren Room 302 Ext

Simulations of the J-PET detector response with the GATE package

NM Module Section 2 6 th Edition Christian, Ch. 3

CHAPTER 9 POSITION SENSITIVE PHOTOMULTIPLIER TUBES

Development of New Peak Detection method for Nuclear Spectroscopy

EKA Laboratory Muon Lifetime Experiment Instructions. October 2006

MuLan Experiment Progress Report

ORTEC. Research Applications. Pulse-Height, Charge, or Energy Spectroscopy. Detectors. Processing Electronics

Learning Objectives. Understand how light is generated in a scintillator. Understand how light is transmitted to a PMT

Detecting and Suppressing Background Signal

Explain what is meant by a photon and state one of its main properties [2]

A NOVEL CONCEPT FOR A POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY SCANNER

Development of Photon Detectors at UC Davis Daniel Ferenc Eckart Lorenz Alvin Laille Physics Department, University of California Davis

Radionuclide Imaging MII 3073 RADIONUCLIDE IMAGING SYSTEM

PHY 122 Shot Noise. Complete Shot Noise Pre- Lab before starting this experiment

3.003 Lab 3 Part A. Measurement of Speed of Light

Spontaneous Fission Spectrum of Neutrons from 252 Cf with Kinetic Energies Less than 1 MeV. Suraj Bastola. A senior thesis submitted to the faculty of

Victoreen , H, A Gamma Scintillation Detector

High collection efficiency MCPs for photon counting detectors

Purpose This experiment will use the coincidence method for time correlation to measure the lifetime in the decay scheme of 57

LaBr 3 :Ce, the latest crystal for nuclear medicine

ORTEC Experiment 1. Introduction to Electronic Signal Analysis in Nuclear Radiation Measurements. Equipment Required: Purpose. Electronic Circuits

Silicon Photomultiplier Evaluation Kit. Quick Start Guide. Eval Kit SiPM. KETEK GmbH. Hofer Str Munich Germany.

PHYSICS ADVANCED LABORATORY I COMPTON SCATTERING Spring 2002

AN ABSTRACT ON THE THESIS OF. David C. Vasquez for the degree of Master of Science in Radiation Health Physics presented on February 26, 2010.

Exercise 4 - THE OSCILLOSCOPE

e t Development of Low Cost γ - Ray Energy Spectrometer

K 223 Angular Correlation

Silicon Photomultiplier

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS OF THE GEIGER COUNTER

STUDY OF NEW FNAL-NICADD EXTRUDED SCINTILLATOR AS ACTIVE MEDIA OF LARGE EMCAL OF ALICE AT LHC

Digital coincidence acquisition applied to portable β liquid scintillation counting device

PET Detectors. William W. Moses Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory March 26, 2002

Today s Outline - January 25, C. Segre (IIT) PHYS Spring 2018 January 25, / 26

Time-of-flight PET with SiPM sensors on monolithic scintillation crystals Vinke, Ruud

Uniformity and Crosstalk in MultiAnode Photomultiplier Tubes

ORTEC. AN34 Experiment 14 Nuclear Lifetimes and the Coincidence Method. Equipment Needed from ORTEC. Equipment Required from Other Manufacturers

PCS-150 / PCI-200 High Speed Boxcar Modules

The Speed of Light Laboratory Experiment 8. Introduction

Investigation of Solid-State Photomultipliers for Positron Emission Tomography Scanners

Chemistry 985. Some constants: q e 1.602x10 19 Coul, ɛ x10 12 F/m h 6.626x10 34 J-s, c m/s, 1 atm = 760 Torr = 101,325 Pa

Advanced Materials Research Vol

Cosmic Rays in MoNA. Eric Johnson 8/08/03

A high energy gamma camera using a multiple hole collimator

NEEP 427 PROPORTIONAL COUNTERS. Knoll, Chapters 6 & 14 Sect. I & II

Photon Counters SR430 5 ns multichannel scaler/averager

ARTICLE IN PRESS. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research A

Physics 342 Laboratory. Scattering of Photons from Free Electrons: Compton Scattering

A CMOS INTEGRATED CIRCUIT FOR PULSE-SHAPE DISCRIMINATION*

arxiv: v2 [physics.ins-det] 17 Oct 2015

PRELIMINARY RESULTS OF PLASTIC SCINTILLATORS DETECTOR READOUT WITH SILICON PHOTOMULTIPLIERS FOR COSMIC RAYS STUDIES *

CAEN Tools for Discovery

CHAPTER 11 HPD (Hybrid Photo-Detector)

GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung. Station Coincidence

Gamex CR 2.0 Program description and operating manual

80 Physics Essentials Workbook Stage 2 Physics

Method for digital particle spectrometry Khryachkov Vitaly

Transcription:

Positron Emission Tomography UBC Physics & Astronomy / PHYS 409 1 Introduction Positron emission tomography (PET) is a non-invasive way to produce the functional 1 image of a patient. It works by injecting some medicine which contains radioactive tracer material (Fludeoxyglucose is usually used) that emits positrons. The emitted positron annihilates with nearby electrons and produce two photons (gamma rays) with energy of 0.511 MeV travelling at opposite directions. Detectors placed around the patient measure the count rate of gamma rays from different positions and angles. Then an image can be reconstructed to show concentration of the tracer material inside the patient s body. For the case of using Fludeoxyglucose as the tracer, the reconstructed image shows the rate of glucose consumption at different regions of the patient to identify tumors. See ref. 1 for more details of how PET works. In this lab we use a piece of radioactive material (enclosed in a plastic disk) which contains Na-22 as the source of positron emission. Different from most PET machine used in hospitals, our setup has only one pair of detectors, so additional transverse scan is needed at each angle. 2 Apparatus This experiment is partly an exercise in equipment debugging. When doing any experiment, one of your most important responsibilities is to ensure each and every piece of equipment is operating as you expect and understand - never, ever trust anything out of the box! Assume everything is completely broken until you personally confirm otherwise. At each step, check on a digital oscilloscope what the output of each piece of equipment is, draw the waveform in your lab book, and make sure you understand all the features you observe. The hardware used in this experiment can be divided into two main categories: detector hardware and signal processing hardware. The experiment setup is shown in Figure 1. 2.1 Detector Hardware 1 To be distinguished with other nuclear imaging method such as X-ray and NMR which provide structural images. 1

The first tool in any experiment is the detector that responds to the physical phenomena you want to examine. In particle physics experiments, the mechanism for detection is almost always an electromagnetic interaction between a detector (scintillator in our case, see 2.1.1) and a photon or an electrically charged particle; E/M interactions are the easiest to use since they are long range (unlike the strong and weak nuclear forces), and much stronger than the gravitational attraction between objects at this scale. Even so, a single photon or a charged particle will not on its own make a signal big enough to easily measure with typical equipment, so most detectors will have some form of preamplifier that receives the raw signal from the active detector elements and amplifies it to a usable size for the rest of the electronics. In this lab, your preamplification will be done using photomultiplier tubes (see 2.1.2), a very sensitive and widely used device that can produce a large voltage signal output in response to only a few photons worth of stimulus. Figure 1: Experimental setups. 2.1.1 Scintillators The scintillator used in PET is usually a piece of crystal that emits a flash of light when ionizing radiation (gamma ray in our case) travels within it. The scintillator is placed in a metal housing and has an adjustable slit opening to the target. The width of the slit should be determined as a compromise between the special resolution and the count rate. 2.1.2 Photomultiplier Tubes (ORTEC 269) Very little energy is deposited in the scintillator by the gamma rays that travel within them; in order to translate the weak pulse of light produced by the plastic into a convenient signal, you ll use a photomultiplier tubes attached directly to the ends of each of your scintillating blocks. A cartoon of a photomultiplier tube can be seen in Figure 2. At the face of the PMT directly adjacent to the scintillator is a photocathode, which will absorb photons from the scintillator and emit electrons via the photoelectric effect. These photoelectrons are accelerated towards a high voltage dynode; upon impact, this electron causes a shower of additional electrons to be emitted from the dynode. All these electrons are accelerated towards a second dynode, and each make a shower there, thus multiplying the size of the current at each dynode; this process is repeated several times, 2

Figure 2: The inner workings and output voltage shape of a typical PMT. The symbol γ is commonly used by particle physicists to represent a photon. until the current is large enough to be easily measured as a voltage pulse in the anode wire at the end. In order for your PMTs to function in this way, a high voltage must be applied to the dynodes. Make sure both of your PMTs are plugged in: there should be a coax running from the High Voltage terminal on the back of each PMT, to a port on the back of the power supply. Keep the high voltage power supply off and set the voltage to 1700 V. Then turn on the power supply on your worktop from the switch in the front. The most important step in any experiment with a long chain of devices processing your signal, is to make sure you understand the signal shape and response at every step. Get a digital oscilloscope and plug each of your PMT outputs in turn, and examine the signals they are outputting on their ANODE channel. Are they all doing the same thing? Is it what you expect? 3

2.2 Signal Processing Hardware Now that you have healthy raw voltage signals coming out of your PMTs, you can start processing this signal to get the best possible results. The most important roles of signal processing are the rejection of noise and background so you can get the most precise and unbiased measurement possible, signal shaping to facilitate optimal electronics operation, and finally turning these voltages into digitized information that your computer can record for analysis. You will be using a chain of several such devices: Amplifiers will amplify the phototube output voltage to the favorite range of the next stage signal processing devices: single channel analyzer; single channel analyzer will choose the real signals from noise and backgrounds. UNIVERSAL COINCIDENCE will further suppress noise by demanding coincidences between the two PMTs. The signal then goes to the PETLAB module which is connected with the PC via the Labview interface. 2.2.1 Amplifier (ORTEC 485) Amplitude of the signal coming from the PMTs depends the amount of energy deposition in the scintillator and the PMT gain. The PMTs have a very large gain, but the gamma ray from positron annihilation has only a moderate energy. So two amplifiers are used to further amplify the signal to an acceptable range (a few Volts). 2.2.2 Single Channel Ananyzer (ORTEC 416) A single-channel analyzer (SCA) produces an output logic pulse on the condition that the peak amplitude of its input signal falls within the pulse-height window that is established with two preset threshold levels. If you carefully watch the raw output of your PMTs (terminal A as marked in Figure 1) or the amplifier (terminal B), you should see fast streams of signals which are similar in shape, but different in amplitudes. The amplitude of a real signal is proportional to the amount of energy deposited in the scintillator by the gamma rays from positron annihilation. The smallest pulses correspond to noise in the PMT electronics; there could also be high-energy cosmic rays entering the scintillators (which penetrate through the metal housing) and deposits a large amount of energy, so the largest of these PMT pulses correspond to these cosmic rays (you may or may not see them); and the real signals (pulses produced by the gamma rays emitted from positron annihilation) are somewhere in between. The job of the single channel analyzer is to only accept pulses that are at the correct range of the real signal, and reject the many smaller pulses produced by electronics noise and the large pulses from cosmic rays. 4

To correctly set the thresholds of the single channel analyzer, first we should identify the real signals. How? One possible solution is to connect both outputs of the amplifier (terminal B) to both channels of the oscilloscope, then set the trigger of the oscilloscope to both channel 1 and 2. But, wait! I haven t seen an oscilloscope with this trigger function So a simple trick is to use the oscilloscope s stop button to capture the scope and find the cases which have signals coincide with each other in both channels (see Figure 3). Be patient, you may need to press the stop/run button 50 times or more to capture a real signal. (a) (b) Figure 3: (a) two signals which are not in coincidence with each other, notice their difference in arrival time; (b) coinciding (real) signals. A better way to identify the real signal is to get a trigger signal that we need, actually it s just there: the output of the UNIVERSAL COINCIDENCE! Connect one of the UNIVERSAL COINCIDENCE (after making sure it has been setup correctly, see 2.2.3) output to the Ext input of the oscilloscope, then set the oscilloscope trigger to Ext, mode to Normal. Use two BNC splitter at the two signal channel analyzers input, and connect the split signal to the two oscilloscope input channels. Now you should be able to see each of the real coinciding signal on the scope without spending too much efforts. Identify the real signal by testing in the following ways: a) put the target at position 0 mm, where you expect mostly real signal; b) put the target at position 20 mm, where you mostly expect fake signal if it happened; c) use the lead plates to block the detector entrances; when you only expects fake signal. 5

2.2.3 Universal Coincidence (ORTEC 418) Outputs from the two single channel analyzers should be connected to two of the universal coincidence s input, and set both of the two input to COINCIDENCE using the INPUT CONTROLS switches. There are two knobs on the front panel. The RESOLVING TIME is used to setup input A, which accepts an input signal with a width of 50 ns or more and regenerates an internal signal that will be used for coincidence comparisons. The regenerated internal signal width is adjustable for a resolving time of 100 ns to 2 μs (think about the case of Figure 3 (a)). The other knob COINCIDENCE REQUIREMENT tells the device how many input channels need to be in coincidence to produce an output signal. What number should be setup here? Confirm that the answer is 2 by several ways of testing (watch the counter output): a) set the COINCIDENCE REQUIREMENT to 1 ; b) connect only one of the input channel. These tests here can also give you an estimation of the noise level, and help setting up the window of the single channel analyzer. 2.3 PETLab Through the PETLab module, the final output is sent to the PC and stored. The PETlab is also used to adjust the position and angle of the target through an automated mechanism. See the Labview program pages for more information on the measurement setup. 3 Analysis After doing a full scan (position scans at different angles), what you obtain is a 2D sinogram. Image of the target needs to be reconstructed from the sonogram by doing an inverse Radon transformation. There are mainly two methods to reconstruct the image. One of them is filtered back projection, which can be found in Python s Scikit-image module. The other method is an iterative method called Maximum Likelihood - Expectation Maximization (MLEM). Both of the methods are described in ref. 1. Depending on your experiment schedule, you may choose either one or both of the image reconstruction methods. 4 References 1. Adam Alessio and Paul Kinahan, PET Image Reconstruction 6