Committee on Development and Intellectual Property (CDIP)

Similar documents
Committee on Development and Intellectual Property (CDIP)

Committee on Development and Intellectual Property (CDIP)

Committee on Development and Intellectual Property (CDIP)

GENEVA COMMITTEE ON DEVELOPMENT AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY (CDIP) Fifth Session Geneva, April 26 to 30, 2010

Committee on Development and Intellectual Property (CDIP)

Committee on Development and Intellectual Property (CDIP)

The 45 Adopted Recommendations under the WIPO Development Agenda

WIPO Development Agenda

THE WIPO DEVELOPMENT AGENDA. New York February 2011

II. The mandates, activities and outputs of the Technology Executive Committee

DESAin collaboration with the ESCAP, the ECLAC, the ECA, the ESCWAand the ECE ($810,600)

Support for Universities and R&D institutions

COUNTRY: Questionnaire. Contact person: Name: Position: Address:

Standing Committee on the Law of Patents

1. Recognizing that some of the barriers that impede the diffusion of green technologies include:

Extract of Advance copy of the Report of the International Conference on Chemicals Management on the work of its second session

Global Intellectual Property Issues

Intergovernmental Committee on Intellectual Property and Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Folklore

Item 4.2 of the Draft Provisional Agenda COMMISSION ON GENETIC RESOURCES FOR FOOD AND AGRICULTURE

Standing Committee on the Law of Patents

Report on the linkage modalities and the rolling workplan of the Technology Executive Committee for

UNCTAD Ad Hoc Expert Meeting on the Green Economy: Trade and Sustainable Development Implications November

Informal document WP.5 (2016) No. 9

Establishing a Development Agenda for the World Intellectual Property Organization

GENEVA WIPO GENERAL ASSEMBLY. Thirty-First (15 th Extraordinary) Session Geneva, September 27 to October 5, 2004

World Trade Organization Regional Workshop, Hong Kong, November 11 to 13, 2014

November 18, 2011 MEASURES TO IMPROVE THE OPERATIONS OF THE CLIMATE INVESTMENT FUNDS

I. Introduction. Cover note. A. Mandate. B. Scope of the note. Technology Executive Committee. Fifteenth meeting. Bonn, Germany, September 2017

WIPO Development Agenda

Science and technology for development

Global Intellectual Property Issues

2010/3 Science and technology for development. The Economic and Social Council,

Technology Executive Committee

Draft Plan of Action Chair's Text Status 3 May 2008


Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISCs)

Fourth Annual Multi-Stakeholder Forum on Science, Technology and Innovation for the Sustainable Development Goals

Second Annual Forum on Science, Technology and Innovation for the Sustainable Development Goals

Committee on Development and Intellectual Property (CDIP)

Feedback for the budget in 2010 and 2011

E Distr. LIMITED E/ESCWA/TDD/2017/IG.1/6 31 January 2017 ENGLISH ORIGINAL: ARABIC

Technical Assistance. Programme of Activities

WFEO STANDING COMMITTEE ON ENGINEERING FOR INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY (WFEO-CEIT) STRATEGIC PLAN ( )

Draft executive summaries to target groups on industrial energy efficiency and material substitution in carbonintensive

UN GA TECHNOLOGY DIALOGUES, APRIL JUNE

The Use of Technological Information: Presentation of the TISC Platform, WIPO Green and other databases Casablanca November 16, 2017

Systems Approaches to Health and Wellbeing in the Changing Urban Environment

The role of IP and other enabling factors for innovation and uptake of climate relevant technologies WIPO Green technology database and services

UNITED NATIONS FRAMEWORK CONVENTION ON CLIMATE CHANGE DEVELOPMENT AND TRANSFER OF TECHNOLOGIES (DECISION 13/CP.1) Submissions by Parties

History of the WIPO Development Agenda

APSEC President s Report

Rolling workplan of the Technology Executive Committee for

Marine biological diversity of areas beyond national jurisdiction. Legal and policy framework

CREATIVE ECONOMY PROGRAMME. Development through Creativity

NON-PAPER ON THE PROJECT ON INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER COMMON CHALLENGES BUILDING SOLUTIONS (DOCUMENT CDIP/4/7)

TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR CONSULTANTS

Second APEC Ministers' Conference on Regional Science & Technology Cooperation (Seoul, Korea, Nov 13-14, 1996) JOINT COMMUNIQUÉ

The UNISDR Global Science & Technology Advisory Group for the implementation of the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction UNISDR

WG/STAIR. Knut Blind, STAIR Chairman

Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD) Common Implementation Strategy (CIS)

SBI/SBSTA: Parties move forward on economic diversification and just transition work

United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change UNFCCC EXPERT GROUP ON TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER FIVE YEARS OF WORK

Social Innovation and new pathways to social changefirst insights from the global mapping

Technology Executive Committee

British Columbia s Environmental Assessment Process

Technology Needs Assessments under GEF Enabling Activities Top Ups

DRAFT TEXT on. SBI 49 agenda item 14(a) Scope of and modalities for the periodic assessment referred to in paragraph 69 of decision 1/CP.

The Space Millennium: Vienna Declaration on Space and Human Development *

CIPO Update. Johanne Bélisle. Commissioner of Patents, Registrar of Trade-marks and Chief Executive Officer

Whole of Society Conflict Prevention and Peacebuilding

Advance unedited version. Decision -/CP.13. Development and transfer of technologies under the Subsidiary Body for Scientific and Technological Advice

DRAFT TEXT on. SBI 49 agenda item 14(a) Scope of and modalities for the periodic assessment referred to in paragraph 69 of decision 1/CP.

Terms of Reference. Call for Experts in the field of Foresight and ICT

Policy Partnership on Science, Technology and Innovation Strategic Plan ( ) (Endorsed)

GENEVA INTERGOVERNMENTAL COMMITTEE ON INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND GENETIC RESOURCES, TRADITIONAL KNOWLEDGE AND FOLKLORE

Role of Patents in Green Technology Transfer in the Context of Climate Change

CBD Request to WIPO on the Interrelation of Access to Genetic Resources and Disclosure Requirements

Access to Medicines, Patent Information and Freedom to Operate

Brief to the. Senate Standing Committee on Social Affairs, Science and Technology. Dr. Eliot A. Phillipson President and CEO

International Civil Aviation Organization ASSEMBLY 38TH SESSION EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE

Chapter 11 Cooperation, Promotion and Enhancement of Trade Relations

NCRIS Capability 5.7: Population Health and Clinical Data Linkage

Knowledge Exchange Strategy ( )

The Sustainable Tourism Programme of the 10-Year Framework of Programmes on Sustainable Consumption and Production

Article 6 of UNFCCC & The New Delhi Work Programme. An overview. Laurence Pollier, Programme Officer Article 6 Climate Change Secretariat (UNFCCC)

Towards a Consumer-Driven Energy System

Initial draft of the technology framework. Contents. Informal document by the Chair

Reduce cost sharing and fees Include other services. Services: which services are covered? Population: who is covered?

Meeting of International Authorities under the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT)

Stakeholders Acting Together On the ethical impact assessment of Research and Innovation

DANUBE INNOVATION PARTNERSHIP

FCCC/AWGLCA/2011/INF.2

General Assembly. United Nations A/63/411. Information and communication technologies for development. I. Introduction. Report of the Second Committee

Lucinda Longcroft, Head, New York Office, World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO)

Collaboration for Human Rights Due Diligence

Annual Report 2010 COS T SME. over v i e w

The main recommendations for the Common Strategic Framework (CSF) reflect the position paper of the Austrian Council

The Intergovernmental Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES)

Unlocking Countries Design Potential. WIPO Pilot Project on Intellectual Property and Design Management for Business Development

DRAFT TEXT on. Version 2 of 9 September 13:00 hrs

Transcription:

E CDIP/10/13 ORIGINAL: ENGLISH DATE: OCTOBER 5, 2012 Committee on Development and Intellectual Property (CDIP) Tenth Session Geneva, November 12 to 16, 2012 DEVELOPING TOOLS FOR ACCESS TO PATENT INFORMATION PHASE II prepared by the Secretariat 1. The Annex to this document, containing a project proposal on Developing Tools for Access to Patent Information - Phase II addresses Development Agenda Recommendations 19, 30, and 31. The estimated cost for the project amounts to 292,000 Swiss francs. 2. The CDIP is invited to consider and approve the Annex to this document. [Annex follows]

ANNEX PROJECT DOCUMENT 1. SUMMARY Project Code DA_19_30_31_02 Title Developing Tools For Access to Patent Information Phase II Development Agenda Recommendations Recommendation 19: To initiate discussions on how, within WIPO s mandate, to further facilitate access to knowledge and technology for developing countries and LDCs, to foster creativity and innovation and to strengthen such existing activities within WIPO. Recommendation 30: WIPO should cooperate with other intergovernmental organizations to provide developing countries, including LDCs, upon request, advice on how to gain access to and make use of IP-related information on technology, particularly in areas of special interest to the requesting parties. Recommendation 31: To undertake initiatives agreed by Member States, which contribute to the transfer of technology to developing countries, such as requesting WIPO to facilitate better access to publicly available patent information. Brief Description of Project The Patent Landscape Report (PLR) project phase II will be aimed at completing the work already done in the framework of phase I, namely refining standardized instruments developed during phase I, promoting and facilitating collaboration amongst IP offices working in the field of patent analytics, and tracking the utility and impact of the reports. The development objective of the project Developing tools for Access to Patent Information is to promote innovation and economic growth in developing and least developed countries by facilitating better informed policy discussions and decisions related to R&D, investment and technology transfer through the provision of PLRs in relevant areas. The expected outcome of the project is improved access to technologies disclosed in patent publications and better knowledge of patenting trends and innovation patterns in specific areas of technology where PLRs will be prepared, as well capacity building of best practices and patent search methodologies in those areas. Phase II of the project aims to contribute to this outcome and objective by continuing with the preparation of new PLRs in the areas identified in Phase I, i.e., public health, food and agriculture, energy and climate change, and disabilities; and by strengthening dissemination and capacity building activities, in particular by organizing a regional conference on patent analytics with a view to

Annex, page 2 drafting methodological guidelines for preparing PLRs and dissemination and exchange of best practices amongst IP offices and institutions working in this field. Implementing Program(s) Program 14 Links to other related Program(s) Global Infrastructure Sector in cooperation with the Department for Traditional Knowledge and Global Challenges, Innovation Division, and Global IP Issues Division, Economics and Statistics Division. Links to WIPO Programs 1, 5, 9, 16 and 18. Links to Expected Results in the Program and Budget 2012/2013 Expected Result II.2: Enhanced human resource capacities to deal with the broad range of requirements for the effective use of IP for development in developing countries, LDCs and countries with economies in transition. Expected Result IV. 2: Enhanced access to, and use of, IP information and knowledge by IP institutions and the public to promote innovation and increased access to protected creative works and creative works in the public domain. Expected Result VII.3: IP-based tools are used for technology transfer from developed to developing countries, particularly LDCs, to address global challenges. Program 18; Distinctive and practically useful information resources combining policy analysis with enhanced use of patent information for policy-makers and practical tools for open innovation. Project Duration November 2012 to December 2013: 14 months Project Budget Non-personnel ressources: 292,000 Swiss francs

Annex, page 3 2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION 2.1. Results of Phase I During Phase I of the project 9 patent landscape reports have been prepared in the areas of Public Health, Food and Agriculture, and Energy and Environment. Further information about the results achieved during Phase I of the project is provided in the project evaluation report (see document CDIP/10/6). 2.2. Objectives of Phase II and main Outputs The first objective of phase II of the project is an improved access to technologies and better knowledge of patenting trends and innovation patterns in specific areas of technology, Accordingly, the main outputs of Phase II will be the preparation of six new PLRs on specific topics of particular interest and priority for LDCs and developing countries in the areas defined during Phase I to support policy discussions and decisions related to development, innovation, R&D investment and technology transfer in specialized intergovernmental (IGOs), non-governmental organizations (NGOs), governments, institutions, R&D centers, academia and other private sector representatives. Additionally, WIPO s existing website on patent landscaping will be enhanced to further facilitate the access to published PLRs, those prepared by WIPO and other institutions. The second objective of phase II is enhanced capacities in developing country institutions for utilizing and preparing PLRs. One related activity will be the organization of a regional conference to facilitate collaboration among IP offices and institutions working in the field of patent analytics and exchange of best practices. As a further output, methodological guidelines for the preparation of PLRs will be drafted. Targeted beneficiaries of these outputs comprise: individual inventors; researchers in technology centers and universities; small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs); industry; academia; IP professionals; policy-makers in national governments, IGOs or NGOs, decision makers in the area of R&D and technology transfer etc. Phase II of the project will seek to further fine tune and improve the standardized instruments developed during Phase I, e.g., the visualization of the findings of each report. Phase II will also seek to better track the utility and impact of the reports developed in Phase I and II among the targeted beneficiaries. 2.3. Delivery Strategy for Phase II The aforementioned objectives will be met by: A. Cooperation with IGOs, NGOs, Member States and national/regional institutions: The experience gained during the implementation of Phase I has shown that PLRs should be prepared in collaboration with partners that have interest and expertise in the relevant subject areas. This permits an efficient definition of the scope of each report and that certain

Annex, page 4 needs of the collaborating partners can be met. Phase II will continue and expand these successful collaborations and will particularly seek to identify local partnering institutions in developing countries in addition to more globally active partners like IGOs and NGOs. In that context, the cooperation with Member States, and national and regional institutions in developing countries will be enhanced by using various approaches for needs assessment, and the definition of the topics of new PLRs of interest for them. B. Capacity building: Each individual PLR includes a comprehensive explanation of the search and analysis methodology which enables the user to apply, e.g., similar search strategies and repeat the investigation to some extent. It serves therefore as an example of patent search and analysis strategies in its respective field of technology. Furthermore, the collaboration on such a report familiarizes the partner with the value and limitation of patent analytics, and with patent information in general. Phase I has shown that the collaboration on a PLR can be very beneficial for a partner organization in that respect. In the selection of topics for new PLRs particular attention will therefore be given to selecting partners that express a need for training in these matters. C. Strengthening Promotion and Dissemination of Patent Landscaping The dissemination and utilization of reports will be strengthened through participation in conferences related to specific subject areas, and by including patent analytics in various patent information related training seminars and workshops to be organized in the framework of Recommendation 8 in order to educate patent offices, Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISCs), Technology Transfer Offices (TTOs) and other institutions. A separate regional conference on patent analytics will be organized during Phase II in order to provide a forum for the exchange of best practices. The conference will also initiate the preparation of methodological guidelines and a compilation of best practices for the preparation and provision of PLRs. The content of the existing WIPO patent landscape report website (http://www.wipo.int/patentscope/en/programs/patent_landscapes/index.html) will be further enhanced by adding further reports, including such that were prepared by other institutions. Depending on needs, executive summaries of the WIPO reports may be translated in other UN languages and included on the website. 2.4. Risks and Mitigation Strategies Risk: Lack of expression of interest for specific topics for future landscape reports by Member States or institutions in developing countries. Mitigation: Offering assistance to Member States for identification of needs and specific, relevant topics to be addressed in PLRs. Possibly, consultation of national policy and development documents, such as National IP or Development Strategies/Plans. Utilization of the network established during Phase I with IGOs and NGOs working in the relevant fields in order to identify potential users of PLRs in member countries.

Annex, page 5 Risk: Insufficient utilization of the reports. Mitigation: Improved dissemination of the reports through WIPO Publications, TISCs or TTOs as information material, inclusion in the WIPO Academy distance learning courses, and participation in awareness raising and other events related to the topic of the each report. Monitoring the dissemination and use of the completed reports by the partner institution with which the report was prepared. Improving the quality and appropriateness of future reports by soliciting and evaluating feedback from other users of published reports, e.g., after each download. Risk: Appropriateness of scope of each report. Mitigation: Each report will be developed in collaboration with a partner institution and the terms of reference of each report will be tailored to the specific needs of the partner. The scope of each report will also be coordinated with the WIPO units working in the respective thematic areas. 3. REVIEW AND EVALUATION 3.1. Project Review Schedule 1. Monitoring Reports Periodic reports will indicate whether specific objectives and milestones have been reached; in cases of them not being reached, why this happened and how this can be resolved; the reports will make use of results from surveys addressed to cooperation partners and other users of the reports and visitors of the PLRs website. 2. Self-Evaluation Report A report will be drafted at the end of the project period with a view to validating whether the project objectives have been achieved, suggesting future actions and highlighting best practices to provide continued sustainability of the project. This report will provide for regular monitoring of the projects against evaluation criteria like relevance, efficiency and sustainability. The reports will be drafted by the Project Manager.

Annex, page 6 3.2. Project Self-Evaluation Project Outputs 1. PLRs in defined areas of interest. 2. Improved website on PLRs with additional information facilitating dissemination. 3. Exchange of experience and best practices among IP offices and other Institutions dealing with IP (TISCs, TTOs). 4. Draft methodology guidelines for preparation of PLRs. Indicators of Successful Completion (Output Indicators) 6 new PLRs completed during Phase II of the project and in collaboration with at least 2 new cooperation partnerships. 20 additional WIPO and external PLRs added on the website during Phase II. Organization of a regional conference/workshop on patent analytics, and participation in other, e.g. TISC, training events. Completed within 12 months after the launch of Phase II of the project. Project Objective(s) Improved access to technologies and better knowledge of, patenting trends and innovation patterns in specific areas of technology. Enhanced capacities in developing country institutions for utilizing and preparing PLRs. Indicator(s) of Success in Achieving Project Objective (Outcome Indicators) - 75 % of the immediate collaboration partners of each PLR are satisfied with the quality of the respective report; - 75 % of the immediate collaboration partners consider the report useful for their own activities; - At least 60% of other users or readers of the PLRs express satisfaction with the quality of the content of each report (factual findings and search methodologies; only users responding to respective surveys); - 30 % of other users find the reports useful for their own activities (e.g. the search methodology); - At least 20% more page views of the dedicated WIPO PLR website in comparison to Phase I; - 20% higher frequency of downloads in comparison to Phase I. - 75% of participants of the regional conference/workshop find that their understanding of patent analytics has improved considerably; - 75% of the users/readers of the PLR preparation guidelines are satisfied with the quality of the guidelines; - 30% of the users/readers of the PLR preparation guidelines consider the guidelines useful for their own activities.

Annex, page 7 4. IMPLEMENTATION TIMELINE Activity 2012 2013 4 th 1 st 2 nd 3 rd 4th Preparation of 6 PLRs x x x x x Publication of new information on the WIPO website and x x x x x its expansion Regional Conference on Patent Landscaping x x Draft methodology guidelines for preparation of PLRs x x x A proposal for tracking the long term impact on the execution of the project x x 5. BUDGET BUDGET (non-personnel resources) Table 1 Project Budget by Cost Category and Year Cost Category Budget (Swiss Francs) 2012 2013 Total Travel and Fellowships Staff Missions 3 17 20 Third-party Travel 52 52 Fellowships Contractual Services Conferences 5 5 Experts Honoraria 4 4 Publishing 1 1 SSA 1 20 190 210 Commercial Services Equipment and Supplies Equipment Supplies and Materials TOTAL 23 269 292 [End of Annex and of document] 1 10,000 Swiss francs are earmarked for the independent evaluation at the end of the project.