Rushcliffe CCG CCG 360 o Stakeholder Survey

Similar documents
Eastern Cheshire CCG CCG 360 o Stakeholder Survey

Kernow CCG CCG 360 o Stakeholder Survey

Swindon CCG CCG 360 o Stakeholder Survey

Southwark CCG CCG 360 o Stakeholder Survey

Portsmouth CCG. CCG 360 o stakeholder survey 2015 Main report. Version 1 Internal Use Only Version 1 Internal Use Only

South Devon and Torbay CCG. CCG 360 o stakeholder survey 2015 Main report Version 1 Internal Use Only

Enfield CCG. CCG 360 o stakeholder survey 2015 Main report. Version 1 Internal Use Only Version 1 Internal Use Only

Oxfordshire CCG. CCG 360 o stakeholder survey 2015 Main report. Version 1 Internal Use Only Version 1 Internal Use Only

Southern Derbyshire CCG. CCG 360 o stakeholder survey 2015 Main report. Version 1 Internal Use Only Version 1 Internal Use Only

Sutton CCG. CCG 360 o stakeholder survey 2015 Main report. Version 1 Internal Use Only Version 1 Internal Use Only

West Norfolk CCG. CCG 360 o stakeholder survey 2014 Main report. Version 1 Internal Use Only Version 7 Internal Use Only

CCG 360 stakeholder survey 2017/18 National report NHS England Publications Gateway Reference: 08192

Sutton CCG. CCG 360 o stakeholder survey 2014 Summary report. Version 1 Internal Use Only Version 1 Internal Use Only

Enfield CCG. CCG 360 o stakeholder survey 2014 Summary report. Version 1 Internal Use Only Version 1 Internal Use Only

CCG 360 o Stakeholder Survey

Trafford CCG. CCG authorisation 360 o stakeholder survey report. Version 18 Internal Use Only Version 14 Internal Use Only

GOVERNING BOARD. 360 Stakeholder Survey Report. Date of Meeting 17 May 2017 Agenda Item No 9. Title

3. Title NHSE & Ipsos Mori CCG 360 Stakeholder Survey

CCG 360 o stakeholder survey 2017/18

NHS NORTH & WEST READING CCG Latest survey results

NHS BATH AND NORTH EAST SOMERSET CCG Latest survey results

NHS SUTTON CCG Latest survey results

NHS SOUTH NORFOLK CLINICAL COMMISSIONING GROUP COMMUNICATIONS AND ENGAGEMENT STRATEGY

Patient and Community Engagement Indicator (Compliance with statutory guidance on patient and public participation in commissioning health and care)

CCGs one year on: member engagement and primary care development. Ruth Robertson Holly Holder Laura Bennett Shilpa Ross Jennifer Gosling

Understanding and demonstrating variation through use of national data tools

SAFEGUARDING ADULTS FRAMEWORK. Prevention and effective responses to neglect, harm and abuse is a basic requirement of modern health care services.

Accountable Officer Report

GOVERNING BODY MEETING in Public 25 April 2018 Agenda Item 3.2

A review of the role and costs of clinical commissioning groups

City and Hackney CCG Clinical Governance Framework. Approved by the CCG Board November 2014

Cheshire, Warrington and Wirral Area Team Commissioning for Value Pack

Cancer. Overview. average 2 It is also important to remember that this assessment is relative: a CCG might make improvements on all

Workforce and Governing Body Members Equality Information (incorporating the WRES progress report) For further information please contact:

Both strategies are available on the CCG s website:

GPC update on co-commissioning of primary care: Important Guidance for CCG member practices and LMCs

CCG Improvement and Assessment Framework 2016/17. Briefing Document

The NHS England Assurance Framework: national report for consultation Chief Officer, Barnet Clinical Commissioning Group

NHS HMR CCG and NHS England Primary Care Joint Commissioning Committee 2015/16

CCG Assurance Framework. England

Title: care.data Pathfinder Stage CCG Recruitment and Selection Process

Policies for the Commissioning of Health and Healthcare

Patient Choice and Resource Allocation Policy. NHS South Warwickshire Clinical Commissioning Group (the CCG)

NHS Sutton CCG. Interim CCG code. This CCG has 29 practices¹, based on those with a registered population in April 2011.

Summary Results of auditors work 2016/17: NHS bodies

NHS South Kent Coast. Clinical Commissioning Group. Complaints, Comments and Compliments Policy

NHS Ipswich and East Suffolk CCG

REPORT TO MERTON CLINICAL COMMISSIONING GROUP GOVERNING BODY

YouGov Survey Results

Doing, supporting and using public health research. The Public Health England strategy for research, development and innovation

Innovation & health connected. Business plan summary

NHS West London (K&C & QPP) CCG

An interpretation of NHS England s Primary Care Co-commissioning: Regional Roadshows questions and answers Rachel Lea, Beds & Herts LMC Ltd

Continuing Healthcare Patient Choice and Resource Allocation Policy

Lambeth Clinical Commissioning Group

NHS Islington CCG. Interim CCG code. This CCG has 43 practices¹, based on those with a registered population in April 2011.

Project Status Update

Herefordshire CCG Patient Choice and Resource Allocation Policy

March 2018 CCG localities profile for Hertfordshire

NHS South Tees Clinical Commissioning Group. Governing Body. Agenda Item:

Twenty-Thirty Health care Scenarios - exploring potential changes in health care in England over the next 20 years

REPORT ON THE EUROSTAT 2017 USER SATISFACTION SURVEY

Herts Valleys Clinical Commissioning Group. Review of NHS Herts Valleys CCG Constitution

Led by clinicians, accountable to local people. East Lancashire Clinical Commissioning Group: Equality & Inclusion Annual Report

Patient involvement and complaints systems

The Friends and Family Test score is calculated as outlined in the NHS England guidance issued in Oct-14. The calculation is as follows:

Community Pharmacy Patient Questionnaire Results for Miltons Chemists

CCG Organisational Structure

Taking the Pulse. How well are you supported?

NHS England London Region Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG) Safeguarding Deep Dive 2015/16 Report

Clinical Commissioning Groups HR Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Please also note that this is an annual survey, so many of these questions will be familiar to you if you completed a survey last year.

SHTG primary submission process

The risks and opportunities for CCGs when co commissioning primary care: Things to consider when making your decision

PRIMARY CARE CO-COMMISSIONING

census 2016: count yourself in

NHS CONTINUING HEALTH CARE:

Evaluation report. Evaluated point Grade Comments

ABHI Response to the Kennedy short study on Valuing Innovation

Report to Frack Free Frodsham & Helsby. Survey Analysis and Report of Residents Attitudes Towards Shale Gas Fracking in Helsby Parish Council Area

Research Specification: understanding consumer experience of first tier complaints

Personal Medical Services (PMS) Contract Review Update

Special Eurobarometer 460. Summary. Attitudes towards the impact of digitisation and automation on daily life

SWL Primary Care Quality, Prevention and Innovation Working Group

The digital journey 2025 and beyond

CONSTITUTION. Version: 5.1 Effective Date: May 2017

Gender Pay Gap report. March 2018

Clinical Commissioning Groups: Basic decision making around delegation

Report to Guilden Sutton Parish Council. Survey Analysis and Report of Residents Attitudes Towards Fracking in Guilden Sutton

Full file at

2. Why did you apply to the Bristol Home Energy Upgrade project? Please rank in order of importance with 1 being the most important.

NHS Vale of York CCG TURNAROUND ACTION PLAN

H5ST 04 (SCDHSC0370) Support the Use of Technological Aids to Promote Independence 1

NHS Bedfordshire Clinical Commissioning Group Constitution. December 2012 version 7

IAPT What Now? What Next? Kevin Mullins Head of Mental Health 2 nd October 2015

Overview. Scotland s Census. Development of methods. What did we do about it? QA panels. Quality assurance and dealing with nonresponse

Gloucestershire Clinical Commissioning Group s Effective Clinical Commissioning Policies list Frequently Asked Questions

Public consultation on Europeana

Consumer and Community Participation Policy

1 Pay Gap Report 2018

Transcription:

CCG 360 o Stakeholder Survey 207-8 Findings

Table of contents Slide 3 Summary Slide 6 Introduction Slide 7 Background and objectives Slide 8 Methodology and technical details Slide 0 Interpreting the results Slide Using the results Slide 3 Combined stakeholder findings Slide 36 Upper tier and unitary local authorities Slide 40 Healthwatch and voluntary/patient groups Slide 43 GP member practices Slide 55 NHS providers Slide 62 Appendix CCG cluster 2

Summary 3

Summary This report presents the results from s 360 Stakeholder Survey 207-8. The annual CCG 360 Stakeholder Survey, which has been conducted online and by telephone since 204, allows a range of key stakeholders to provide feedback on working relationships with their CCG. The results are used to support CCGs ongoing development and feed into improvement and assessment conversations with NHS England. The following chart presents the summary findings across the CCG for the questions asked of all stakeholders. This provides the percentage of stakeholders responding positively to the key questions, including year-on-year comparisons where the question was also asked in 207 and 206. Base = all stakeholders except CQC (208; 25, 207; 29, 206; 3) unless otherwise stated Overall Engagement 208 207 206 Overall, how would you rate the effectiveness of your working relationship with the CCG? 84% 93% 94% % very/fairly good How satisfied or dissatisfied are you with how the CCG involves patients and the public?* 80% - - % very/fairly satisfied Commissioning services 208 207 206 The CCG involves the right individuals and organisations when commissioning/decommissioning services The CCG provides adequate information to explain the reasons for the decisions it makes when commissioning/decommissioning services % strongly/tend to agree % strongly/tend to agree 80% 83% 87% 76% - - I have confidence the CCG s plans will deliver high quality services that demonstrate value for money 72% - - % strongly/tend to agree I have confidence in the CCG to commission/decommission services appropriately % strongly/tend to agree 84% - - The CCG demonstrates it has considered the views of patients and the public when making commissioning decisions* 68% - - % strongly/tend to agree *Base = all stakeholders (208; 25, 207; 29, 206; 3) Fieldwork: 5th January - March 4

Summary cont. Leadership of the CCG 208 207 206 How effective, if at all, do you feel your CCG is as a local system leader? 88% 97% 94% The leadership of the CCG has the necessary blend of skills and experience* 76% 93% 94% There is clear and visible leadership of the CCG* 84% 97% 97% I have confidence in the leadership of the CCG to deliver its plans and priorities* 80% 97% 94% The leadership of CCG is delivering high quality services within the available resources* 80% - - I have confidence in the leadership of the CCG to deliver improved outcomes for patients* 80% 97% 94% % strongly/tend to agree The leadership of the CCG is contributing effectively to local partnership arrangements (including Sustainability Transformation Partnerships (STPs), Accountable Care Systems (ACSs) where 88% - - applicable and/or other local partnership arrangements)* % strongly/tend to agree I have confidence that the CCG monitors the quality of the services it commissions in an effective manner If I had concerns about the quality of local services I would feel able to raise my concerns within the CCG % very/fairly effective % strongly/tend to agree % strongly/tend to agree % strongly/tend to agree % strongly/tend to agree Monitoring and reviewing services 208 207 206 % strongly/tend to agree % strongly/tend to agree 80% 79% 90% 92% 97% 94% I have confidence in the CCG to act on feedback it receives about the quality of services 84% 90% 90% % strongly/tend to agree Plans and priorities 208 207 206 How much would you say you know about the CCG s plans and priorities? % a great deal/fair amount 84% 93% 90% I have been given the opportunity to influence the CCG s plans and priorities 68% 76% 74% % strongly/tend to agree When I have commented on the CCG s plans and priorities I feel that my comments have been considered (even if the CCG has not been able to act on them) % strongly/tend to agree 76% 76% 74% The CCG has effectively communicated its plans and priorities to me 80% 83% 87% % strongly/tend to agree Base = all stakeholders except CQC (208; 25, 207; 29, 206; 3) unless otherwise stated Fieldwork: 5th January - March 5

Introduction 6

Background and objectives Clinical Commissioning Groups (CCGs) need to have strong relationships with a range of stakeholders in order to be successful commissioners within their local health and care systems. These relationships provide CCGs with valuable intelligence to help them make the effective commissioning decisions for their local populations. The CCG 360 o Stakeholder Survey enables stakeholders to provide feedback about their CCGs. The results of the survey serve two purposes:. To provide a wealth of data for CCGs to help with their ongoing organisational development, supporting them to build strong and productive relationships with stakeholders. The findings can provide a valuable tool for all CCGs to evaluate their progress, and inform the way that they work and make decisions. 2. To help NHS England to assess CCGs stakeholder relationships and leadership within their local health and care systems, and how effectively they commission services to improve service quality and health outcomes. 7

Methodology and technical details It was the responsibility of each CCG to provide the list of stakeholders to invite to take part in the CCG 360 o stakeholder survey. At the time of fieldwork, the four Nottinghamshire CCGs (Nottingham City CCG, Nottingham North & East CCG, Nottingham West CCG and ) were part of a shadow Accountable Care System (now termed an Integrated Care System ), working in close partnership with one another. They identified the stakeholders they had in common, and those stakeholders were asked to respond across the group of CCGs, rather than for an individual CCG. The results in this report therefore represent a combination of the views of the stakeholders which are common across the group of CCGs in the Nottinghamshire ICS, and those which are unique to this particular CCG, i.e. their GP member practices. CCGs were provided with a specification of core stakeholder organisations to be included in their stakeholder list. Beyond this, however, CCGs had the flexibility to determine which individual within each organisation was the most appropriate to nominate. CCGs were also given the opportunity to add up to ten additional stakeholders they wanted to include locally (they are referred to in this report as wider stakeholders ). These included: Commissioning Support Units, Health Education England, lower tier local authorities, MPs, private providers, Public Health England, local care homes, GP out-of-hours providers and others. Stakeholders were sent an email inviting them to complete the survey online. Stakeholders who did not respond to the email invitation, and stakeholders for whom an email address was not provided, were telephoned by an Ipsos MORI interviewer who encouraged response and offered the opportunity to complete the survey by telephone. Nottingham City CCG 8

Methodology and technical details Within the survey, stakeholders were asked a series of questions about their working relationship with the CCG. In addition, to reflect each core stakeholder group s different area of expertise and knowledge, they were presented with a short section of questions specific to the stakeholder group they represented. Fieldwork was conducted between 5 th January and 28th February. 25 of the CCG s stakeholders completed the survey. The overall response rate was 7%, which varied across the stakeholder groups as shown in the table opposite. Survey response rates for Stakeholder group GP member practices One from every member practice* Health and wellbeing boards Up to two per HWB* Local Healthwatch/voluntary patient groups Up to three per local Healthwatch* NHS providers Up to two from each acute, mental health and community health providers* Invited to take part in survey Completed survey Response rate 2 2 00% 2 0 0% 4 3 75% 3 3 00% Other CCGs Up to five* 5 4 80% Upper tier or unitary local authorities Up to five per LA* 9 3 33% Wider stakeholders 0 0 N/A *Specification from the core stakeholder framework 9

Interpreting the results For each question, the response to each answer is presented as both a percentage (%) and as a number (n). The total number of stakeholders who answered each question (the base size) is also stated at the bottom of each chart and in every table. For questions with fewer than 30 stakeholders answering, we strongly recommend that you look at the number of stakeholders giving each response rather than the percentage, as the percentage can be misleading when based on so few stakeholders. This report presents the results from s stakeholder survey. Throughout the report, the CCG/your CCG refers to. Where results do not sum to 00%, or where individual responses (e.g. tend to agree; strongly agree) do not sum to combined responses (e.g. strongly/tend to agree) this is due to rounding. 0

Using the results the reports This report contains a summary section, a section on overall views of relationships and a section for each of the main stakeholder groups who were invited to complete the survey. The overall summary slides show the results at CCG level for the questions asked of all stakeholders (i.e. only those in section of the questionnaire). This provides CCGs with an at a glance visual summary of the results for the key questions, including direction of travel comparisons where appropriate. The stakeholder specific sections of the report contain those questions which were targeted at individual groups of stakeholders only. These questions were often around specific issues which were only relevant to the specific group of stakeholders. The remainder of the report shows the results for all questions in the survey including any local questions where CCGs included them. The results for each question are provided at CCG level with a breakdown also shown for each of the core stakeholder groups where relevant. This allows CCGs to interrogate the data in more detail.

Using the results comparisons The comparisons are included to provide an indication of differences only and should be treated with caution due to the low numbers of respondents and differences in stakeholder lists. Any differences are not necessarily statistically significant differences; a higher score than the cluster average does not always equate to better performance, and a higher score than in 207 does not necessarily mean the CCG has improved. The comparisons offer a starting point to inform wider discussions about the CCG s ongoing organisational development and its relationships with stakeholders. For example, they may indicate areas in which stakeholders think the CCG is performing relatively less well, for the CCG to discuss internally and externally to identify what improvements can be made in this area, if any. 2

Combined stakeholder findings 3

Overall, how would you rate the effectiveness of your working relationship with the CCG? All stakeholders By stakeholder group 3 2% 4% Stakeholder group No. of respondents Very good/ Fairly good Fairly poor/ Very poor GP member practices 2 83% (0) 8% () Health & wellbeing boards 0 - - 6 24% 60% 5 Healthwatch and voluntary/patient groups 3 67% (2) - NHS providers 3 67% (2) - Other CCGs 4 00% (4) - Upper tier/unitary LA 3 00% (3) - Very good Fairly good Neither good nor poor Fairly poor Very poor Don't know CCG change across time Percentage of stakeholders saying very good/fairly good Wider stakeholders 0 - - Regional and cluster comparisons Percentage of stakeholders saying very good/fairly good 94% 93% 84% CCG 208 National Cluster* DCO** 84% 76% 83% 73% 206 207 208 Number of respondents: 208 (25), 207 (29), 206 (3) Number of respondents: CCG 208 (25), National (788), Cluster (58), DCO (545). *A cluster is the group of CCGs that are most similar to the CCG based on several population characteristics.. **The DCO is the group of local CCGs that fall under the same Director of Commissioning Operations as the CCG. Fieldwork: 5th January - 28th February 4

To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements about the way in which the CCG commissions/decommissions services? The CCG involves the right individuals and organisations when commissioning/decommissioning services All stakeholders 4 6% 4% By stakeholder group Stakeholder group No. of respondents Strongly/Tend to agree Strongly/Tend to disagree GP member practices 2 83% (0) 8% () 48% 2 Health & wellbeing boards 0 - - Healthwatch and voluntary/patient groups 3 67% (2) - 32% NHS providers 3 33% () - 8 Other CCGs 4 00% (4) - Upper tier/unitary LA 3 00% (3) - Strongly agree Tend to agree Neither agree nor disagree Tend to disagree Strongly disagree Don't know Wider stakeholders 0 - - CCG change across time Regional and cluster comparisons 87% 83% 80% CCG 208 National Cluster* DCO** 57% 59% 5% 80% 206 207 208 Number of respondents: 208 (25), 207 (29), 206 (3) Number of respondents: CCG 208 (25), National (788), Cluster (58), DCO (545). *A cluster is the group of CCGs that are most similar to the CCG based on several population characteristics. **The DCO is the group of local CCGs that fall under the same Director of Commissioning Operations as the CCG. Fieldwork: 5th January - 28th February 5

To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements about the way in which the CCG commissions/decommissions services? The CCG provides adequate information to explain the reasons for the decisions it makes when commissioning/decommissioning services All stakeholders 3 2 2% 8% 4% 44% By stakeholder group Stakeholder group No. of respondents Strongly/Tend to agree Strongly/Tend to disagree GP member practices 2 83% (0) 7% (2) Health & wellbeing boards 0 - - Healthwatch and voluntary/patient groups 3 33% () - 8 32% NHS providers 3 33% () 33% () Other CCGs 4 00% (4) - Upper tier/unitary LA 3 00% (3) - Strongly agree Tend to agree Neither agree nor disagree Tend to disagree Strongly disagree Don't know Wider stakeholders 0 - - CCG change across time Regional and cluster comparisons There is no trend data available for this question, as it was asked for the first time in 208. CCG 208 National Cluster* DCO** 55% 56% 5% 76% Number of respondents: CCG 208 (25), National (788), Cluster (58), DCO (545). *A cluster is the group of CCGs that are most similar to the CCG based on several population characteristics. **The DCO is the group of local CCGs that fall under the same Director of Commissioning Operations as the CCG. Fieldwork: 5th January - 28th February 6

To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements about the way in which the CCG commissions/decommissions services? I have confidence the CCG s plans will deliver high quality services that demonstrate value for money All stakeholders 5 20% 4% 4% By stakeholder group Stakeholder group No. of respondents Strongly/Tend to agree Strongly/Tend to disagree GP member practices 2 83% (0) 7% (2) Health & wellbeing boards 0 - - 56% 4 Healthwatch and voluntary/patient groups 3 33% () - 6% NHS providers 3 - - 4 Other CCGs 4 00% (4) - Upper tier/unitary LA 3 00% (3) - Strongly agree Tend to agree Neither agree nor disagree Tend to disagree Strongly disagree Don't know Wider stakeholders 0 - - CCG change across time Regional and cluster comparisons There is no trend data available for this question, as it was asked for the first time in 208. CCG 208 National Cluster* DCO** 59% 59% 52% 72% Number of respondents: CCG 208 (25), National (788), Cluster (58), DCO (545). *A cluster is the group of CCGs that are most similar to the CCG based on several population characteristics.. **The DCO is the group of local CCGs that fall under the same Director of Commissioning Operations as the CCG. Fieldwork: 5th January - 28th February 7

To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements about the way in which the CCG commissions/decommissions services? I have confidence in the CCG to commission/decommission services appropriately All stakeholders 2 4% 4% 8% By stakeholder group Stakeholder group No. of respondents Strongly/Tend to agree Strongly/Tend to disagree GP member practices 2 83% (0) 7% (2) 9 36% 48% 2 Health & wellbeing boards 0 - - Healthwatch and voluntary/patient groups 3 33% () - NHS providers 3 00% (3) - Other CCGs 4 00% (4) - Upper tier/unitary LA 3 00% (3) - Strongly agree Tend to agree Neither agree nor disagree Tend to disagree Strongly disagree Don't know CCG change across time Wider stakeholders 0 - - Regional and cluster comparisons There is no trend data available for this question, as it was asked for the first time in 208. CCG 208 National Cluster* DCO** 60% 62% 56% 84% Number of respondents: CCG 208 (25), National (788), Cluster (58), DCO (545). *A cluster is the group of CCGs that are most similar to the CCG based on several population characteristics.. **The DCO is the group of local CCGs that fall under the same Director of Commissioning Operations as the CCG. Fieldwork: 5th January - 28th February 8

To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements about the leadership of the CCG? The leadership of the CCG has the necessary blend of skills and experience All stakeholders 4 6% 4% 4% 48% 2 By stakeholder group Stakeholder group No. of respondents Strongly/Tend to agree Strongly/Tend to disagree GP member practices 2 83% (0) 7% (2) Health & wellbeing boards 0 - - Healthwatch and voluntary/patient groups 3 33% () - 7 28% NHS providers 3 33% () - Other CCGs 4 00% (4) - Upper tier/unitary LA 3 00% (3) - Strongly agree Tend to agree Neither agree nor disagree Tend to disagree Strongly disagree Don't know Wider stakeholders 0 - - CCG change across time Regional and cluster comparisons 94% 93% 76% CCG 208 National Cluster* DCO** 59% 63% 53% 76% 206 207 208 Number of respondents: 208 (25), 207 (29), 206 (3) Number of respondents: CCG 208 (25), National (7884), Cluster (58), DCO (545). *A cluster is the group of CCGs that are most similar to the CCG based on several population characteristics. **The DCO is the group of local CCGs that fall under the same Director of Commissioning Operations as the CCG. Fieldwork: 5th January - 28th February 9

To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements about the overall leadership of the CCG? There is clear and visible leadership of the CCG All stakeholders 2 8% 4% 4% By stakeholder group Stakeholder group No. of respondents Strongly/Tend to agree Strongly/Tend to disagree GP member practices 2 83% (0) 8% () Health & wellbeing boards 0 - - 6 24% 60% 5 Healthwatch and voluntary/patient groups 3 67% (2) - NHS providers 3 67% (2) 33% () Other CCGs 4 00% (4) - Upper tier/unitary LA 3 00% (3) - Strongly agree Tend to agree Neither agree nor disagree Tend to disagree Strongly disagree Don't know Wider stakeholders 0 - - CCG change across time Regional and cluster comparisons 97% 97% 84% CCG 208 National Cluster* DCO** 69% 69% 6% 84% 206 207 208 Number of respondents: 208 (25), 207 (29), 206 (3) Number of respondents: CCG 208 (25), National (7884), Cluster (58), DCO (545). *A cluster is the group of CCGs that are most similar to the CCG based on several population characteristics.. **The DCO is the group of local CCGs that fall under the same Director of Commissioning Operations as the CCG. Fieldwork: 5th January - 28th February 20

To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements about the clinical leadership of the CCG? I have confidence in the leadership of the CCG to deliver its plans and priorities All stakeholders 2 7 2 8% 28% 8% 4% 52% 3 By stakeholder group Stakeholder group No. of respondents Strongly/Tend to agree Strongly/Tend to disagree GP member practices 2 83% (0) 7% (2) Health & wellbeing boards 0 - - Healthwatch and voluntary/patient groups 3 33% () 33% () NHS providers 3 67% (2) - Other CCGs 4 00% (4) - Upper tier/unitary LA 3 00% (3) - Strongly agree Tend to agree Neither agree nor disagree Tend to disagree Strongly disagree Don't know Wider stakeholders 0 - - CCG change across time Regional and cluster comparisons 94% 97% 80% CCG 208 National Cluster* DCO** 62% 64% 54% 80% 206 207 208 Number of respondents: 208 (25), 207 (29), 206 (3) Number of respondents: CCG 208 (25), National (7884), Cluster (58), DCO (545). *A cluster is the group of CCGs that are most similar to the CCG based on several population characteristics.. **The DCO is the group of local CCGs that fall under the same Director of Commissioning Operations as the CCG. Fieldwork: 5th January - 28th February 2

To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements about the leadership of the CCG? The leadership of the CCG is delivering high quality services within the available resources All stakeholders 3 2% 4% 4% By stakeholder group Stakeholder group No. of respondents Strongly/Tend to agree Strongly/Tend to disagree GP member practices 2 83% (0) 7% (2) Health & wellbeing boards 0 - - 5 20% 60% 5 Healthwatch and voluntary/patient groups 3 67% (2) - NHS providers 3 33% () - Other CCGs 4 00% (4) - Upper tier/unitary LA 3 00% (3) - Strongly agree Tend to agree Neither agree nor disagree Tend to disagree Strongly disagree Don't know Wider stakeholders 0 - - CCG change across time Regional and cluster comparisons There is no trend data available for this question, as it was asked for the first time in 208. CCG 208 National Cluster* DCO** 63% 65% 59% 80% Number of respondents: CCG 208 (25), National (7884), Cluster (58), DCO (545). *A cluster is the group of CCGs that are most similar to the CCG based on several population characteristics.. **The DCO is the group of local CCGs that fall under the same Director of Commissioning Operations as the CCG. Fieldwork: 5th January - 28th February 22

To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements about the leadership of the CCG? I have confidence in the leadership of the CCG to deliver improved outcomes for patients All stakeholders 3 2% 4% 4% By stakeholder group Stakeholder group No. of respondents Strongly/Tend to agree Strongly/Tend to disagree GP member practices 2 83% (0) 7% (2) Health & wellbeing boards 0 - - 7 28% 52% 3 Healthwatch and voluntary/patient groups 3 33% () - NHS providers 3 67% (2) - Other CCGs 4 00% (4) - Upper tier/unitary LA 3 00% (3) - Strongly agree Tend to agree Neither agree nor disagree Tend to disagree Strongly disagree Don't know Wider stakeholders 0 - - CCG change across time Regional and cluster comparisons 94% 97% 80% CCG 208 80% National Cluster* DCO** 6% 6% 54% 206 207 208 Number of respondents: 208 (25), 207 (29), 206 (3) Number of respondents: CCG 208 (25), National (7884), Cluster (58), DCO (545). *A cluster is the group of CCGs that are most similar to the CCG based on several population characteristics.. **The DCO is the group of local CCGs that fall under the same Director of Commissioning Operations as the CCG. Fieldwork: 5th January - 28th February 23

To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements about the leadership of the CCG? The leadership of the CCG is contributing effectively to local partnership arrangements (including Sustainability Transformation Partnerships (STPs), Accountable Care Systems (ACSs) where applicable and/or other local partnership arrangements). All stakeholders By stakeholder group 2 8% 4% Stakeholder group No. of respondents Strongly/Tend to agree Strongly/Tend to disagree GP member practices 2 83% (0) 8% () 6 24% 64% 6 Health & wellbeing boards 0 - - Healthwatch and voluntary/patient groups 3 00% (3) - NHS providers 3 67% (2) - Other CCGs 4 00% (4) - Upper tier/unitary LA 3 00% (3) - Strongly agree Tend to agree Neither agree nor disagree Tend to disagree Strongly disagree Don't know Wider stakeholders 0 - - CCG change across time Regional and cluster comparisons There is no trend data available for this question, as it was asked for the first time in 208. CCG 208 National Cluster* DCO** 62% 62% 56% 88% Number of respondents: CCG 208 (25), National (7884), Cluster (58), DCO (545). *A cluster is the group of CCGs that are most similar to the CCG based on several population characteristics. **The DCO is the group of local CCGs that fall under the same Director of Commissioning Operations as the CCG. Fieldwork: 5th January - 28th February 24

To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements about the way in which the CCG monitors and reviews the quality of the services it commissions? I have confidence that the CCG monitors the quality of the services it commissions in an effective manner All stakeholders 2 2 8% 8% 4% By stakeholder group Stakeholder group No. of respondents Strongly/Tend to agree Strongly/Tend to disagree GP member practices 2 75% (9) 25% (3) Health & wellbeing boards 0 - - 6 24% 56% 4 Healthwatch and voluntary/patient groups 3 67% (2) - NHS providers 3 67% (2) - Other CCGs 4 00% (4) - Upper tier/unitary LA 3 00% (3) - Strongly agree Tend to agree Neither agree nor disagree Tend to disagree Strongly disagree Don't know Wider stakeholders 0 - - CCG change across time Regional and cluster comparisons 90% 79% 80% CCG 208 National Cluster* DCO** 63% 66% 6% 80% 206 207 208 Number of respondents: 208 (25), 207 (29), 206 (3) Number of respondents: CCG 208 (25), National (788), Cluster (58), DCO (545). *A cluster is the group of CCGs that are most similar to the CCG based on several population characteristics. **The DCO is the group of local CCGs that fall under the same Director of Commissioning Operations as the CCG. Fieldwork: 5th January - 28th February 25

To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements about the way in which the CCG monitors and reviews the quality of the services it commissions? If I had concerns about the quality of local services I would feel able to raise my concerns within the CCG All stakeholders 6 24% 4% 4% By stakeholder group Stakeholder group No. of respondents Strongly/Tend to agree Strongly/Tend to disagree GP member practices 2 83% (0) 8% () Health & wellbeing boards 0 - - 68% 7 Healthwatch and voluntary/patient groups 3 00% (3) - NHS providers 3 00% (3) - Other CCGs 4 00% (4) - Upper tier/unitary LA 3 00% (3) - Strongly agree Tend to agree Neither agree nor disagree Tend to disagree Strongly disagree Don't know Wider stakeholders 0 - - CCG change across time Regional and cluster comparisons 94% 97% 92% CCG 208 National Cluster* DCO** 92% 83% 88% 82% 206 207 208 Number of respondents: 208 (25), 207 (29), 206 (3) Number of respondents: CCG 208 (25), National (788), Cluster (58), DCO (545). *A cluster is the group of CCGs that are most similar to the CCG based on several population characteristics.. **The DCO is the group of local CCGs that fall under the same Director of Commissioning Operations as the CCG. Fieldwork: 5th January - 28th February 26

To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements about the way in which the CCG monitors and reviews the quality of the services it commissions? I have confidence in the CCG to act on feedback it receives about the quality of services All stakeholders 4% 4% 4% 4% By stakeholder group Stakeholder group No. of respondents Strongly/Tend to agree Strongly/Tend to disagree GP member practices 2 83% (0) 7% (2) Health & wellbeing boards 0 - - 6 24% 60% 5 Healthwatch and voluntary/patient groups 3 67% (2) - NHS providers 3 67% (2) - Other CCGs 4 00% (4) - Upper tier/unitary LA 3 00% (3) - Strongly agree Tend to agree Neither agree nor disagree Tend to disagree Strongly disagree Don't know Wider stakeholders 0 - - CCG change across time Regional and cluster comparisons 90% 90% 84% CCG 208 National Cluster* DCO** 64% 67% 6% 84% 206 207 208 Number of respondents: 208 (25), 207 (29), 206 (3) Number of respondents: CCG 208 (25), National (788), Cluster (58), DCO (545). *A cluster is the group of CCGs that are most similar to the CCG based on several population characteristics. **The DCO is the group of local CCGs that fall under the same Director of Commissioning Operations as the CCG. Fieldwork: 5th January - 28th February 27

How much would you say you know about the CCG s plans and priorities? All stakeholders By stakeholder group 3 2% 4% 24% 6 Stakeholder group No. of respondents A great deal/ a fair amount Not very much/ nothing at all GP member practices 2 83% (0) 7% (2) Health & wellbeing boards 0 - - Healthwatch and voluntary/patient groups 3 67% (2) 33% () NHS providers 3 67% (2) 33% () 60% 5 A great deal A fair amount Not very much Nothing at all Other CCGs 4 00% (4) - Upper tier/unitary LA 3 00% (3) - Wider stakeholders 0 - - CCG change across time Percentage of stakeholders saying a great deal/a fair amount Regional and cluster comparisons Percentage of stakeholders saying a great deal/a fair amount 90% 93% 84% CCG 208 National Cluster* DCO** 84% 78% 8% 74% 206 207 208 Number of respondents: 208 (25), 207 (29), 206 (3) Number of respondents: CCG 208 (25), National (788), Cluster (58), DCO (545). *A cluster is the group of CCGs that are most similar to the CCG based on several population characteristics.. **The DCO is the group of local CCGs that fall under the same Director of Commissioning Operations as the CCG. Fieldwork: 5th January - 28th February 28

To what extent do you agree or disagree with each of the following statements about the CCG s plans and priorities? I have been given the opportunity to influence the CCG s plans and priorities All stakeholders 2 By stakeholder group Stakeholder group No. of respondents Strongly/ Tend to agree Strongly/ Tend to disagree 4% 8% 9 GP member practices 2 75% (9) 7% (2) 5 20% 36% Health & wellbeing boards 0 - - Healthwatch and voluntary/patient groups 3 33% () - NHS providers 3 33% () 33% () 32% Other CCGs 4 75% (3) - 8 Strongly agree Tend to agree Neither agree nor disagree Tend to disagree Strongly disagree Don't know Upper tier/unitary LA 3 00% (3) - Wider stakeholders 0 - - CCG change across time Regional and cluster comparisons 74% 76% 68% CCG 208 National Cluster* DCO** 68% 53% 57% 50% 206 207 208 Number of respondents: 208 (25), 207 (29), 206 (3) Number of respondents: CCG 208 (25), National (788), Cluster (58), DCO (545). *A cluster is the group of CCGs that are most similar to the CCG based on several population characteristics. **The DCO is the group of local CCGs that fall under the same Director of Commissioning Operations as the CCG. Fieldwork: 5th January - 28th February 29

To what extent do you agree or disagree with each of the following statements about the CCG s plans and priorities? When I have commented on the CCG s plans and priorities I feel that my comments have been considered (even if the CCG has not been able to act on them) All stakeholders 2 2 4% 8% 4% 0 8% 40% By stakeholder group Stakeholder group No. of respondents Strongly/ Tend to agree Strongly/ Tend to disagree GP member practices 2 75% (9) 7% (2) Health & wellbeing boards 0 - - Healthwatch and voluntary/patient groups 3 67% (2) - 36% 9 Strongly agree Tend to agree Neither agree nor disagree Tend to disagree Strongly disagree Don't know NHS providers 3 67% (2) - Other CCGs 4 75% (3) - Upper tier/unitary LA 3 00% (3) - Wider stakeholders 0 - - CCG change across time Regional and cluster comparisons 74% 76% 76% CCG 208 National Cluster* DCO** 53% 59% 55% 76% 206 207 208 Number of respondents: 208 (25), 207 (29), 206 (3) Number of respondents: CCG 208 (25), National (788), Cluster (58), DCO (545). *A cluster is the group of CCGs that are most similar to the CCG based on several population characteristics.. **The DCO is the group of local CCGs that fall under the same Director of Commissioning Operations as the CCG. Fieldwork: 5th January - 28th February 30

To what extent do you agree or disagree with each of the following statements about the CCG s plans and priorities? The CCG has effectively communicated its plans and priorities to me All stakeholders 2 8% 3 2% 40% 0 By stakeholder group Stakeholder group No. of respondents Strongly/ Tend to agree Strongly/ Tend to disagree GP member practices 2 83% (0) 8% () Health & wellbeing boards 0 - - Healthwatch and voluntary/patient groups 3 67% (2) 33% () 40% 0 Strongly agree Tend to agree Neither agree nor disagree Tend to disagree Strongly disagree Don't know NHS providers 3 33% () 33% () Other CCGs 4 00% (4) - Upper tier/unitary LA 3 00% (3) - Wider stakeholders 0 - - CCG change across time Regional and cluster comparisons 87% 83% 80% CCG 208 National Cluster* DCO** 62% 62% 56% 80% 206 207 208 Number of respondents: 208 (25), 207 (29), 206 (3) Number of respondents: CCG 208 (25), National (788), Cluster (58), DCO (545). *A cluster is the group of CCGs that are most similar to the CCG based on several population characteristics. **The DCO is the group of local CCGs that fall under the same Director of Commissioning Operations as the CCG. Fieldwork: 5th January - 28th February 3

How effective, if at all, do you feel the CCG is as a local system leader? By local system leader we mean that the CCG works proactively and constructively with the other partners in its local health and care economy, prioritising tasks-in-common over formal organisational boundaries, for example as part of an STP/ACS/other local partnership. All stakeholders 4% 4% 4% By stakeholder group Stakeholder group No. of respondents Very/fairly effective Not very/ not at all effective GP member practices 2 83% (0) 8% () 6 24% 64% 6 Health & wellbeing boards 0 - - Healthwatch and voluntary/patient groups 3 00% (3) - NHS providers 3 67% (2) 33% () Other CCGs 4 00% (4) - Upper tier/unitary LA 3 00% (3) - Very effective Fairly effective Not very effective Not at all effective Don't know Wider stakeholders 0 - - CCG change across time Percentage of stakeholders saying very/fairly effective Regional and cluster comparisons Percentage of stakeholders saying very/fairly effective 94% 97% 88% CCG 208 National Cluster* DCO** 72% 74% 70% 88% 206 207 208 Number of respondents: 208 (25), 207 (29), 206 (3) Number of respondents: CCG 208 (25), National (788), Cluster (58), DCO (545). *A cluster is the group of CCGs that are most similar to the CCG based on several population characteristics. **The DCO is the group of local CCGs that fall under the same Director of Commissioning Operations as the CCG. Fieldwork: 5th January - 28th February 32

How satisfied or dissatisfied are you with how the CCG involves patients and the public? This may be done in various ways, for example through public meetings, focus groups, working with Patient Participation Groups (PPGs), voluntary organisations and local Healthwatch, and through the CCG s website, newsletters, and communications in GP surgeries. All stakeholders By stakeholder group 2 2 4% 8% 8% Stakeholder group No. of respondents Very/fairly satisfied Fairly/very dissatisfied GP member practices 2 75% (9) 8% () Health & wellbeing boards 0 - - 5 20% 60% 5 Healthwatch and voluntary/patient groups 3 67% (2) - NHS providers 3 00% (3) - Other CCGs 4 75% (3) - Upper tier/unitary LA 3 00% (3) - Very satisfied Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied Very dissatisfied CCG change across time Fairly satisfied Fairly dissatisfied Don't know Percentage of stakeholders saying very/fairly satisfied Wider stakeholders 0 - - Regional and cluster comparisons Percentage of stakeholders saying very/fairly satisfied There is no trend data available for this question, as it was asked for the first time in 208. CCG 208 National Cluster* DCO** 80% 64% 68% 62% Number of respondents: CCG 208 (25), National (7884), Cluster (58), DCO (545). *A cluster is the group of CCGs that are most similar to the CCG based on several population characteristics.. **The DCO is the group of local CCGs that fall under the same Director of Commissioning Operations as the CCG. Fieldwork: 5th January - 28th February 33

To what extent do you agree or disagree that the CCG demonstrates it has considered the views of patients and the public when making commissioning decisions? All stakeholders By stakeholder group 2 4% 8% Stakeholder group No. of respondents Strongly/Tend to agree Strongly/Tend to disagree GP member practices 2 75% (9) 8% () 5 20% 48% 2 Health & wellbeing boards 0 - - Healthwatch and voluntary/patient groups 3 33% () - 20% NHS providers 3 33% () - Other CCGs 4 75% (3) - 5 Strongly agree Tend to agree Neither agree nor disagree Tend to disagree Strongly disagree Don't know Upper tier/unitary LA 3 00% (3) - Wider stakeholders 0 - - CCG change across time Regional and cluster comparisons There is no trend data available for this question, as it was asked for the first time in 208. CCG 208 National Cluster* DCO** 68% 56% 59% 52% Number of respondents: CCG 208 (25), National (7884), Cluster (58), DCO (545). *A cluster is the group of CCGs that are most similar to the CCG based on several population characteristics. **The DCO is the group of local CCGs that fall under the same Director of Commissioning Operations as the CCG. Fieldwork: 5th January - 28th February 34

To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement? How effective is the CCG at working with others to improve health outcomes? All stakeholders 2 8% 4% By stakeholder group Stakeholder group No. of respondents Very/fairly effective Not very/at all effective GP member practices 2 83% (0) 8% () 6 24% 64% 6 Health & wellbeing boards 0 - - Healthwatch and voluntary/patient groups 3 67% (2) 33% () NHS providers 3 00% (3) - Other CCGs 4 00% (4) - Upper tier/unitary LA 3 00% (3) - Very effective Fairly effective Not very effective Not at all effective Don't know Wider stakeholders 0 - - CCG change across time Percentage of stakeholders saying very/fairly effective Regional and cluster comparisons Percentage of stakeholders saying very/fairly effective There is no trend data available for this question, as it was asked for the first time in 208. CCG 208 National Cluster* DCO** 74% 74% 68% 88% Number of respondents: CCG 208 (25), National (7884), Cluster (58), DCO (545). *A cluster is the group of CCGs that are most similar to the CCG based on several population characteristics. **The DCO is the group of local CCGs that fall under the same Director of Commissioning Operations as the CCG. Fieldwork: 5th January - 28th February 35

Upper tier and unitary local authorities 36

How well, if at all, would you say the CCG and your local authority are working together to plan and deliver integrated commissioning? All upper tier/unitary local authority stakeholders 33% 2 67% Very well Fairly well Not very well Not at all well Don't know Total responses: All upper tier / unitary local authority stakeholders (3) Fieldwork: 5th January - 28th February 37

How effective, if at all, has the CCG been as part of the Local Safeguarding Children Board? All upper tier/unitary local authority stakeholders 33% 67% 2 Very effective Fairly effective Not very effective Not at all effective Don't know Total responses: All upper tier / unitary local authority stakeholders (3) Fieldwork: 5th January - 28th February 38

How effective, if at all, has the CCG been as part of the Safeguarding Adults Board? All upper tier/unitary local authority stakeholders 00% 3 Very effective Fairly effective Not very effective Not at all effective Don't know Total responses: All upper tier / unitary local authority stakeholders (3) Fieldwork: 5th January - 28th February 39

40 Healthwatch and voluntary/patient groups

To what extent, if at all, do you feel that the CCG has engaged with hard to reach groups? Hard to reach groups are those who may experience barriers to accessing services or who are underrepresented in healthcare decision making, for example, black and minority ethnic (BME) groups, Gypsies and Travellers, lesbian, gay, bisexual and trans (LGBT) people, asylum seekers, and young carers. All Healthwatch and voluntary/patient group stakeholders 33% 67% 2 A great deal A fair amount Just a little Not at all Don't know Total responses: All healthwatch and voluntary/ patient groups (3) Fieldwork: 5th January - 28th February 4

To what extent do you agree or disagree that the CCG demonstrates that it considers and acts appropriately in response to concerns, complaints or issues raised by patients and the public? All Healthwatch and voluntary/patient group stakeholders 33% 2 67% Strongly agree Tend to agree Neither agree nor disagree Tend to disagree Strongly disagree Don't know Total responses: All healthwatch and patient group stakeholders (3) Fieldwork: 5th January - 28th February 42

GP member practices 43

To what extent, if at all, do you feel able to influence the CCG s decision-making process? All member practices 3 25% 33% 4 58% (7) 64% (7) A great deal/fair amount 208 A great deal/fair amount 207 75% (9) A great deal/fair amount 206 7% 2 25% 3 A great deal A fair amount Just a little Not at all Don't know Total responses: All member practices (208: 2; 207: ; 206: 2) Fieldwork: 5th January - 28th February 44

To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements about the clinical leadership of your CCG/CCG? I have confidence in the clinical leadership of the CCG All member practices 8% 8% 83% (0) Strongly/Tend to agree 208 8% 9% (0) Strongly/Tend to agree 207 92% () Strongly/Tend to agree 206 75% 9 Strongly agree Tend to agree Neither agree nor disagree Tend to disagree Strongly disagree Don't know Total responses: All member practices (208: 2; 207: ; 206: 2) Fieldwork: 5th January - 28th February 45

To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements about the clinical leadership of your CCG/CCG? There is clear and visible clinical leadership of the CCG All member practices 8% 8% 83% (0) Strongly/Tend to agree 208 2 7% 67% 8 Strongly agree Tend to agree Neither agree nor disagree Tend to disagree Strongly disagree Don't know Total responses: All member practices (208: 2) Fieldwork: 5th January - 28th February 46

To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements about the clinical leadership of your CCG/CCG? The clinical leadership of my CCG has effective influence within local partnerships (STPs/ACSs/other) All member practices 8% 8% 75% (9) Strongly/Tend to agree 208 8% 7% 58% 7 2 Strongly agree Tend to agree Neither agree nor disagree Tend to disagree Strongly disagree Don't know Total responses: All member practices (208: 2) Fieldwork: 5th January - 28th February 47

How well, if at all, would you say that you understand? The financial implications of the CCG s plans All member practices 8% 8% 8% 33% 4 75% (9) 9% (0) Very/Fairly well 208 Very/Fairly well 207 75% (9) Very/Fairly well 206 42% 5 Very well Fairly well Not very well Not at all well Don't know Total responses: All member practices (208: 2; 207: ; 206: 2) Fieldwork: 5th January - 28th February 48

How well, if at all, would you say that you understand? The implications of the CCG s plans for service improvement All member practices 2 7% 25% 3 83% (0) 9% (0) Very/Fairly well 208 Very/Fairly well 207 75% (9) Very/Fairly well 206 58% 7 Very well Fairly well Not very well Not at all well Don't know Total responses: All member practices (208: 2; 207: ; 206: 2) Fieldwork: 5th January - 28th February 49

How well, if at all, would you say that you understand? The referral and activity implications of the CCG s plans All member practices 8% 8% 33% 4 83% (0) 9% (0) Very/Fairly well 208 Very/Fairly well 207 83% (0) Very/Fairly well 206 50% 6 Very well Fairly well Not very well Not at all well Don't know Total responses: All member practices (208: 2; 207: ; 206: 2) Fieldwork: 5th January - 28th February 50

How well, if at all, would you say that you understand? The CCG s plans to improve the health of the local population and reduce health inequalities All member practices 2 7% 4 83% (0) Very/Fairly well 208 33% 50% 6 Very well Fairly well Not very well Not at all well Don't know Total responses: All member practices (208: 2) Fieldwork: 5th January - 28th February 5

To what extent do you agree or disagree that value for money is a key factor in decision-making when formulating the CCG s plans and priorities? All member practices 8% 8% 83% (0) Strongly/Tend to agree 208 9% (0) Strongly/Tend to agree 207 2 7% 67% 83% (0) Strongly/Tend to agree 206 8 Strongly agree Tend to agree Neither agree nor disagree Tend to disagree Strongly disagree Don t know Total responses: All member practices (208: 2; 207: ; 206: 2) Fieldwork: 5th January - 28th February 52

How familiar are you, if at all, with the financial position of the CCG? All member practices 8% 92% () Very/Fairly familiar 208 42% 5 82% (9) Very/Fairly familiar 207 50% 75% (9) Very/Fairly familiar 206 6 Very familiar Fairly familiar Not very familiar Not at all familiar Don t know Total responses: All member practices (208: 2; 207: ; 206: 2) Fieldwork: 5th January - 28th February 53

To what extent do you agree or disagree that representatives from member practices are able to take a leadership role within the CCG if they want to? All member practices 8% 8% 83% (0) Strongly/Tend to agree 208 9% (0) Strongly/Tend to agree 207 2 7% 67% 83% (0) Strongly/Tend to agree 206 8 Strongly agree Tend to agree Neither agree nor disagree Tend to disagree Strongly disagree Don t know Total responses: All member practices (208: 2; 207: ; 206: 2) Fieldwork: 5th January - 28th February 54

NHS Providers 55

How well, if at all, would you say the CCG and your organisation are working together to develop long-term strategies and plans? All NHS providers 33% 2 67% Very well Fairly well Not very well Not at all well Don't know Total responses: All NHS providers (3) Fieldwork: 5th January - 28th February 56

Would you say that the amount of monitoring the CCG carries out on the quality of your services is too much, too little or about right? All NHS providers 33% 2 67% Too much About right Too little Don't know Total responses: All NHS providers (3) Fieldwork: 5th January - 28th February 57

To what extent do you agree or disagree that when there is an issue with the quality of services, the response of the CCG is proportionate and fair? All NHS providers 33% 2 67% Strongly agree Neither agree nor disagree Strongly disagree There has never been an issue with the quality of services Tend to agree Tend to disagree Don't know Total responses: All NHS providers (3) Fieldwork: 5th January - 28th February 58

How involved, if at all, would you say clinicians from the CCG are in discussions with your organisation about: Quality All NHS providers 00% 3 Very involved Fairly involved Not very involved Not at all involved Don't know Total responses: All NHS providers (3) Fieldwork: 5th January - 28th February 59

How involved, if at all, would you say clinicians from the CCG are in discussions with your organisation about: Service redesign All NHS providers 00% 3 Very involved Fairly involved Not very involved Not at all involved Don't know Total responses: All NHS providers (3) Fieldwork: 5th January - 28th February 60

How well, if at all, would you say the CCG understands the challenges facing your provider organisation? All NHS providers 00% 3 Very well Fairly well Not very well Not at all well Don't know Total responses: All NHS providers (3) Fieldwork: 5th January - 28th February 6

Appendix 62

CCG clusters Each CCG is compared to a cluster of the other CCGs to which they are most similar. The clusters are based on the following variables: Index of Multiple Deprivation averages (overall and health domain) Population registered with practices Age of population Population density Ethnicity Ratio of registered population to overall population Based on these variables, the following CCGs form the CCG cluster for Eastern Cheshire CCG East Surrey CCG South Eastern Hampshire CCG Mid Essex CCG South Cheshire CCG High Weald Lewes Havens CCG East Leicestershire and Rutland CCG Stafford and Surrounds CCG South Lincolnshire CCG South East Staffs and Seisdon Peninsular CCG Redditch and Bromsgrove CCG Harrogate and Rural District CCG Surrey Heath CCG South West Lincolnshire CCG North Hampshire CCG Horsham and Mid Sussex CCG Fieldwork: 5th January - 28th February 63

For more information ccg360stakeholder@ipsos-mori.com Version Internal Use Only This work was carried out in accordance with the requirements of the international quality standard for market research, ISO 20252:2006 and with the Ipsos MORI Terms and Conditions which can be found here CCG 360 Stakeholder Survey 208 - Report April 208 Public 64