Solutions Brief 1 KU VS. KA

Similar documents
High-performance inflight connectivity for business aviation

Rocket Science made simple

2Ku. High-performance inflight connectivity. Gogo 2Ku specifications

Inflight Connectivity Presentation

Expert Dialogue on Real-time Monitoring of Flight Data. Patrick M. French Head, Business Development Asia-Pacific 26 May 2014

Airborne Satellite Communications on the Move Solutions Overview

Global Xpress. Global Mobile Broadband. Yulia Koulikova, Laura Roberti Almaty, September 2012

Next-gen ATG. The next-generation Air-to-Ground solution

An Introduction to Airline Communication Types

Rockwell Collins Connectivity Overview. October 11, 2011

SPACE-BASED SOLUTIONS & ANALYTICS

UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS STUDY GROUP (UASSG)

I. BACKGROUND - Viasat s current and future Ka-band satellite fleet and network operations and service.

Satellite Industry Update New System and Regulatory Issues. Spectrum Management 2014

Inmarsat Maritime A different approach

COMMENTS OF TELESAT CANADA

Satisfying growth demands for offshore communications

Satisfying growth demands for maritime communications. Michael Carter, Sales Director Network & Data Services

Cobham SATCOM Marine. Chris Insall Manager, Commercial Programmes. Hamburg, 28 th Feb Digital Ship Hamburg - 28 February 2013

Dimov Stojče Ilčev. CNS Systems

Dear Sir, Regards. Dr Mike Willis. Head of Spectrum Policy, UK Space Agency

Question 1: Do you have any comments on our approach to this review?:

RRS-17 Africa Forum Emerging Innovative Technologies

Leadership built upon facts Cobham SATCOM Maritime communication solutions

AIRBORNE SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS ON THE MOVE

SATELLITES & SPECTRUM

An insight in the evolution of GEO satellite technologies for broadband services

High Throughput Satellite Networks

Gilat Goes Aero: What's Behind Its Surprising IFC Success

SMARTER SOLUTIONS FOR AN UNKNOWN FUTURE

Great Momentum In Technology, Financing and Commercialization

SATELLITE SUBSYSTEMS. Networks and Communication Department. Dr. Marwah Ahmed

WHAT PUSHED US INTO HTS SYSTEMS?

Ground Segment Technology Developments at ESA for Maritime Communications

Satellite Industry Update New Systems and Regulatory Issues. Spectrum Management 2013

SwiftBroadband Oceanic Safety Implementation and Trials

New Solutions for Cruise with Jo De Loor, VP. Business Development at Newtec High Capacity Modems, Channel Bonding and New Waveforms

Delivering More for Less Where You Want It, When You Want It!

Future IMT Bands: WRC-15 & C-band Satellite Solutions for the Caribbean. David Hartshorn Secretary General GVF

Potential Markets for Optical Communications SkyLight Workshop ESTEC, 08/02/2017 D. Mignolo, P. Haines

Quality counts. ...Q&A C-COM Satellite Systems

KVH mini-vsat Broadband Redefining Satellite Communications at Sea

Feb 7, 2018 A potential new Aeronautical Mobile Satellite Route Service system in the 5 GHz band for the RPAS C2 link ICAO WRC19 Workshop, Mexico

SAMARA Satellite communication system for Atm service

35th AIAA ICSSC Colloquium: High Throughput Satellite (HTS) Broadband Opportunities: Orbits, Architectures, Interference and Markets

NEW Ka band HTS Solutions for Offshore Communications

Advancements in SATCOM for Airborne C2 and ISR Networks

Selecting the Optimal 700MHz LTE Antenna for Public Safety Communications. By Jerry Posluszny, Director of Engineering, Mobile Mark

communication systems Almaty, Kazakhstan, 5-7 September 2012 Konstantin Lanin

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2007/ A1

Opportunistic Vehicular Networks by Satellite Links for Safety Applications

RECOMMENDATION ITU-R M.1391 METHODOLOGY FOR THE CALCULATION OF IMT-2000 SATELLITE SPECTRUM REQUIREMENTS

Ka Band and Broadband Satellite service

Satellite Services Regulatory Issues and Broadband Internet

Frequency Migration Regulation ICASA Hearings. The risks of proposed migration plan on the satellite bands

Exploring Trends in Technology and Testing in Satellite Communications

Iridium NEXT SensorPODs: Global Access For Your Scientific Payloads

RECOMMENDATION ITU-R M.1181

Satellite Technology for Future Applications

Satellite services and products for Automatic Weather Stations. Sophie Baudel

Phone: Fax: Mentor Radio, LLC. Airport Wireless Integrated Connectivity System (AWICS)

ARTICLE DEVELOPMENT OF NEW SATELLITE SOLUTIONS FOR MILITARY APPLICATIONS

Technology and Market Trends in Millimeter Waves

Satellite Regulation to Foster Broadband Access

We are IntechOpen, the first native scientific publisher of Open Access books. International authors and editors. Our authors are among the TOP 1%

AIREON SPACE-BASED ADS-B

Two-way satellite Internet consists of:

18-20 Mbps Down 8-10 Mbps Up Low Power Req. (3-4W ) Smaller Antennas Lower-Priced Hardware Lower-Cost Bandwidth

SpaceDataHighway. Commercial Data Relay Service and its Evolution

Global Xpress Ultrafast data with world s smallest antenna. jrceurope.com/gx

Flat Panel Antennas State of the Art

Dimov Stojče Ilčev. CNS Systems

SOLUTIONS Paper Wi4 Fixed: Point-to-Point Wireless Broadband Solutions. Point-to-Point Connectivity in the 4.9 GHz Public Safety Band

Satellite Orbit & Spectrum Resources for Future Innovation WRC-15 OUTCOME

Demonstration of Decimeter-level Real-time Positioning of an Airborne Platform

Maritime SatCom Glossary & Certification Projects

Sharing scenarios of 5G (IMT-2020) networks with the incumbent and future satellite communication systems

Satcom for Railway Communications - Benefits in a Bearer Flexible Scenario

SUPPORT OF NETWORK FORMATS BY TRIMBLE GPSNET NETWORK RTK SOLUTION

Optimising a Unified Space and Ground Segment

MARITIME SERVICE >> GOING GLOBAL

GPS/WAAS Program Update

Avanti Ka-Band IP Broadcast Bundle 24 (EMEA Coverage)

EE Chapter 14 Communication and Navigation Systems

MEO Satellite Applications to Support Mobility

Using Variable Coding and Modulation to Increase Remote Sensing Downlink Capacity

Basic Satellite Communication. Thaicom Customer and Network Services Department

Outline. What is WAIC. Why is WAIC Important. Regulatory Process Update Status of ITU Documents Proposal CPM Text Topics.

Wireless Avionics Intra-Communications (WAIC)

WRC19 Preparatory Workshop

SwiftBroadband Technical workshop

Point to Multipoint Topologies

Going Beyond RF Coverage: Designing for Capacity

Useful Definitions. The two books are:

ICAO Handbook on Radio Frequency Spectrum Requirements for Civil Aviation Vol. I - ICAO Spectrum Strategy Vol. II - Frequency Planning

Wireless replacement for cables in CAN Network Pros and Cons. by Derek Sum

GOVERNMENT AND DEFENSE COTS SATCOM

AGENDA ITU Regional Workshop Current Trends and Best Practices of Satellite Communications Minsk, May ATDI Experience

Regional and Inter-Regional Seminar and Workshop on Search and Rescue

ATDI Software Use for Space Services Yerevan, 15 December 2017

Transcription:

Solutions Brief 1

WHY THE RIGHT SATELLITE TECHNOLOGY MATTERS FOR AIRBORNE CONNECTIVITY When selecting a service provider for onboard internet, most aircraft owners rightfully focus on product features, business benefits, and cost. These factors play a critical role in choosing the best inflight Wi-Fi service, but are not the only considerations. Technology matters, too; specifically, whether your service provider has the right technical systems in place to support your business now and in the future. That s where Ku vs. Ka comes in. These abbreviations refer to frequency bands on the radio spectrum that are used by inflight internet providers to deliver Wi-Fi to aircraft via satellite. They sound similar, but they re not created equal and the difference can make or break your onboard internet experience. KU AND KA DEFINED Ku and Ka are abbreviations used to designate particular ranges, or bands, of the global radio spectrum. The names come from German; the K from Kurz, which means short a reference to the wavelength used by the signal that travels between the satellite and the antenna and the u and a from Unter (under) and Above, respectively. Ku, or Kurz Unter, is the frequency band under the original K-band satellite frequency, while Ka, or Kurz Above, is the band above it. The Ku band covers the radio frequencies from 11.7 to 14.5GHz The Ka band covers the radio frequencies of 26.5-40GHz Why does this matter for inflight connectivity? There are two ways to get internet on an airplane: an air to ground network and via satellite. Air to ground is less technically complex, but satellite offers far greater coverage, including over the ocean. It works by transmitting data to and from satellites over designated frequency bands that vary depending on the satellite operator, including Ku and Ka. Which band an internet service provider uses can make a significant impact on the quality of the satellite connection. L-BAND 1-2 GHZ L-band spectrum is provided by Inmarsat and Iridium. Ku-BAND 12-18 GHZ Ku-band spectrum is provided by a number of different satellite operators, including Intelsat, SES, Eutelsat, and Hughes, among others. Ka-BAND 26-40 GHZ Ka-band spectrum is provided by ViaSat s Exede service, Inmarsat s Global Xpress, and Eutelsat. 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 Frequency, GHz 2

KU-BAND VS. KA-BAND: WHAT S THE DIFFERENCE? From a technical perspective, neither Ku or Ka is necessarily better than the other; they simply refer to different parts of the radio spectrum. The differences between the two bands become relevant when you look at factors other than frequency range that relate to usage and infrastructure. These include: Capacity: Is there enough capacity on the satellite network dedicated to aviation that will serve my passengers today AND in the future? Coverage: Are there enough satellites covering ALL of my flight routes? Availability: Can I ensure my passengers stay connected if something goes wrong? IS A KU OR KA NETWORK BETTER? There is a common perception that when it comes to satellite networks, newer must be better. This is not necessarily the case. While there are pros and cons of each network, the emphasis for business aviation should be on capacity and coverage. In these respects, Ku delivers: it is a mature satellite network with an existing worldwide constellation of satellites and high capacity beams. CAPACITY When it comes to capacity, the winner is clear: Ku offers much more capacity to serve aviation because there are so many more Ku than Ka satellites. Major hub cities like Chicago, New York, London, Tokyo, and other areas of heavy aircraft concentration rely on multiple Ku satellites to ensure redundancy, while the same regions are only served by a small fraction of one satellite on the Ka band. Redundancy is the key word here. Ku satellites can operate high throughput satellite (HTS) beams or wide regional beams. HTS uses spot beams to concentrate a high bandwidth Ku beam into a small area where aviation traffic is high as well as wide regional beams across lower use routes. These beams typically overlap, providing redundancy in coverage. At Gogo, for instance, we have access to more than 100 Gbps of capacity on our Ku-band network, which is exclusively dedicated to the aviation market. Ka satellite providers share bandwidth with numerous other markets. In fact, one operator of Ka band satellite internet in the United States also serves an additional 675,000 residential customers. That puts a significant dent in its capacity capabilities. 3

COVERAGE Ku outperforms Ka on coverage for the same reason: there are many more Ku satellites positioned around the globe that can provide dedicated resources to aviation. That means that organizations like Gogo can source airtime from multiple satellite operators to build a network with greater capacity and a high level of redundancy. By using the hundreds of existing Ku band satellites orbiting the Earth, Gogo covers 98% of global flight hours today. Service providers that use the Ka band, on the other hand, must rely on far fewer satellites, with predictable results. There are currently two Ka satellite providers serving aviation, both of whom only use satellites in the network that they own. Ka Provider 1 has four satellites in orbit providing near global coverage. However, capacity is shared across each region with land and maritime terminals, which are usually located in the same high demand areas for aviation. Ka Provider 2 has no global coverage. They have one satellite in orbit covering different portions of North America, one with coverage over the Atlantic, and plan to add three more by 2020 for a total of five satellites. This will still be insufficient to provide high quality global coverage and meet the capacity needs of hub cities for aviation. 4

Ka Provider 1 Ka Provider 2 5

AVAILABILITY The third consideration, availability, results from the previous two. With the better capacity and coverage of more satellites, a Ku band system can deliver greater bandwidth, consistency, and reliability. An abundance of supply ensures consistent satellite handoffs and optimal service for passengers and crew. Diversity of supply means the Ku network is highly redundant, so if one satellite fails, the service provider can quickly re-route traffic to maintain continuous service. Interoperability of the Ku network allows service to easily scale as demand increases, even with future Ku satellites, like HTS and LEO satellites. These features translate to a connection that your passengers and crew can trust, whether they are streaming YouTube or accessing critical weather or navigation data. GOGO KU VS. KA SATELLITE PROVIDERS GOGO KU KA SATELLITE PROVIDERS Number of satellites Hundreds 2-4 Redundancy High Low Satellites dedicated to aviation? Yes No Proprietary satellite network? No; greater flexibility Yes; limited coverage Uniform, high-quality global coverage? Yes Yes Ability to scale with demand? Yes No Takeoff-to-landing coverage? Yes Yes GOGO KU: KEY REASONS TO INVEST Gogo has provided commercial airlines with the power of a Ku-based network for years. In 2018, those same capabilities will come to business aviation with the Gogo Ku satellite-based solution. With new antennas designed specifically for private aircraft, next-gen modems that enhance performance and speed, regulatory approvals in 200+ countries, and over 180 satellites and two data centers, Gogo Ku provides the infrastructure and service you need for high-speed connectivity with zero compromise. Comprehensive. 180+ satellites deliver reliable, redundant coverage around the globe. Scalable. The rapidly growing network of Ku satellites and forward-compatible technology ensure supply now and in the future. Exclusive. A network dedicated exclusively to aviation eliminates performance issues from sharing capacity with other industries. 6

Proven. Gogo Ku powers more than 600 commercial aircraft today, meeting high consumer demand without issue. Differentiating. Takeoff-to-landing connectivity means executive passengers won t miss a minute. The Gogo Ku network is built on an open architecture, supporting high-throughput satellite (HTS) platforms and future Ku satellites. READY TO LEARN MORE? For more information about Gogo Ku for business aviation, visit our website or get in touch with a Gogo inflight connectivity consultant today. 7

Connect with us: 105 Edgeview Drive, Suite 300 Broomfield, CO 80021 USA +1 888.328.0200 Toll-free +1 303.301.3271 Worldwide connect@gogoair.com Email business.gogoair.com