Retrieving Focal Mechanism of Earthquakes Using the CAP Method

Similar documents
A hybrid method of simulating broadband ground motion: A case study of the 2006 Pingtung earthquake, Taiwan

QC TX Network. Introduction. R. B. Herrmann, Saint Louis University

EXPLOITING AMBIENT NOISE FOR SOURCE CHARACTERIZATION OF REGIONAL SEISMIC EVENTS

28th Seismic Research Review: Ground-Based Nuclear Explosion Monitoring Technologies

Magnitude determination using duration of high frequency energy radiation for the 2011 Off the Pacific Coast of Tohoku Earthquake

EPICENTRAL LOCATION OF REGIONAL SEISMIC EVENTS BASED ON EMPIRICAL GREEN FUNCTIONS FROM AMBIENT NOISE

Regional and Far-Regional Earthquake Locations and Source Parameters Using Sparse Broadband Networks: A Test on the Ridgecrest Sequence

A Rayleigh wave back-projection method applied to the 2011 Tohoku earthquake

New Metrics Developed for a Complex Cepstrum Depth Program

Geophysical Journal International

29th Monitoring Research Review: Ground-Based Nuclear Explosion Monitoring Technologies

2008 Monitoring Research Review: Ground-Based Nuclear Explosion Monitoring Technologies

Here I briefly describe the daily seismicity analysis procedure: Table 1

Source inversion of W phase: speeding up seismic tsunami warning

Characterizing average properties of Southern California ground motion envelopes

TOWARD A RAYLEIGH WAVE ATTENUATION MODEL FOR CENTRAL ASIA

27th Seismic Research Review: Ground-Based Nuclear Explosion Monitoring Technologies

The COMPLOC Earthquake Location Package

Some observations of data quality at global seismic stations

=, (1) Summary. Theory. Introduction

Geophysical Journal International

Geophysical Journal International

Identification of High Frequency pulse from Earthquake asperities along Chilean subduction zone using strong motion

Coda Waveform Correlations

27th Seismic Research Review: Ground-Based Nuclear Explosion Monitoring Technologies

DATABASE: SUMMARY, STATUS AND GROUND MOTION PRODUCTS

Supplementary Materials for

TOWARD A RAYLEIGH WAVE ATTENUATION MODEL FOR EURASIA AND CALIBRATING A NEW M S FORMULA

We calculate the median of individual (observed) seismic spectra over 3-hour time slots.

Chapter 8 3 September 2002 M = 4.75 Yorba Linda, California, earthquake

RAPID MAGITUDE DETERMINATION FOR TSUNAMI WARNING USING LOCAL DATA IN AND AROUND NICARAGUA

Short Notes Characterization of a Continuous, Very Narrowband Seismic Signal near 2.08 Hz

Anisotropic Frequency-Dependent Spreading of Seismic Waves from VSP Data Analysis

INFLUENCE OF STATIC DISPLACEMENT ON PEAK GROUND VELOCITY AT SITES THAT EXPERIENCED FORWARD-RUPTURE DIRECTIVITY

ASSESSING LOCATION CAPABILITY WITH GROUND TRUTH EVENTS: THE DEAD SEA AND SOUTH AFRICA REGIONS. Clifford Thurber, Haijiang Zhang, and William Lutter

Multicomponent seismic polarization analysis

29th Monitoring Research Review: Ground-Based Nuclear Explosion Monitoring Technologies REGIONAL EVENT IDENTIFICATION RESEARCH IN ASIA

Observations and origin of Rayleigh-wave amplitude anomalies

27th Seismic Research Review: Ground-Based Nuclear Explosion Monitoring Technologies

Th P6 01 Retrieval of the P- and S-velocity Structure of the Groningen Gas Reservoir Using Noise Interferometry

Cascadia Amphibious Array Ocean Bottom Seismograph Horizontal Component Orientations

P and S wave separation at a liquid-solid interface

Cmin. Cmax. Frac volume. SEG Houston 2009 International Exposition and Annual Meeting. Summary (1),

A COMPARISON OF SITE-AMPLIFICATION ESTIMATED FROM DIFFERENT METHODS USING A STRONG MOTION OBSERVATION ARRAY IN TANGSHAN, CHINA

Study of Low-frequency Seismic Events Sources in the Mines of the Verkhnekamskoye Potash Deposit

AVO processing of walkaway VSP data at Ross Lake heavy oilfield, Saskatchewan

Geophysical Journal International

Cascadia Amphibious Array Ocean Bottom Seismograph Horizontal Component Orientations

Spatial coherency of earthquake-induced ground accelerations recorded by 100-Station of Istanbul Rapid Response Network

Using W phase for regional tsunami warning and rapid earthquake hazard assessment

TOWARD A RAYLEIGH WAVE ATTENUATION MODEL FOR ASIA AND SURROUNDING REGIONS. Sponsored by National Nuclear Security Administration

CDAAC Ionospheric Products

Contents of this file 1. Text S1 2. Figures S1 to S4. 1. Introduction

SURFACE WAVE SIMULATION AND PROCESSING WITH MATSEIS

Performance of the GSN station SSE-IC,

Simulated Strong Ground Motion in Southern China based on Regional Seismographic Data and Stochastic Finite-Fault Model

The Vertical Component P-Wave Receiver Function

Group Velocity Measurement

Estimation of the Earth s Impulse Response: Deconvolution and Beyond. Gary Pavlis Indiana University Rick Aster New Mexico Tech

Amplitude balancing for AVO analysis

Real-time testing of the on-site warning algorithm in southern California and its performance during the July M w 5.4 Chino Hills earthquake

is our source image of the 2010 Haiti earthquake? Henriette Sudhaus & Sebastian Heimann Frank Krüger, Thomas R. Walter

Tomostatic Waveform Tomography on Near-surface Refraction Data

A COMPARISON OF TIME- AND FREQUENCY-DOMAIN AMPLITUDE MEASUREMENTS. Hans E. Hartse. Los Alamos National Laboratory

Multiple attenuation via predictive deconvolution in the radial domain

Refinements to the method of epicentral location based on surface waves from ambient seismic noise: Introducing Love waves

DETERMINATION OF FAULT PLANE SOLUTIONS USING WAVEFORM AMPLITUDES AND RADIATION PATTERN

Preseismic TEC changes for Tohoku Oki earthquake

Here the goal is to find the location of the ore body, and then evaluate its size and depth.

Manual of ASWMS. Contents. Ge Jin 1 and James Gaherty 1. April 25, Introduction 2

Optimize Full Waveform Sonic Processing

Lecture 3 Complex Exponential Signals

Polarization Filter by Eigenimages and Adaptive Subtraction to Attenuate Surface-Wave Noise

Numerical Simulation of Seismic Wave Propagation and Strong Motions in 3D Heterogeneous Structure

Hector Mine, California, earthquake

Estimating the epicenters of local and regional seismic sources, using the circle and chord method (Tutorial with exercise by hand and movies)

1.Earthquake Early Warning System. Japan Meteorological Agency

A Combined Multi-Temporal InSAR Method: Incorporating Persistent Scatterer and Small Baseline Approaches. Andy Hooper University of Iceland

Approaches for Angle of Arrival Estimation. Wenguang Mao

Experiment 19. Microwave Optics 1

SOURCE SPECTRA, MOMENT, AND ENERGY FOR RECENT EASTERN MEDITERRANEAN EARTHQUAKES: CALIBRATION OF INTERNATIONAL MONITORING SYSTEM STATIONS

Data-Driven Earthquake Location Method Project Report

2011 Monitoring Research Review: Ground-Based Nuclear Explosion Monitoring Technologies

Complementary PPT tutorial to IS 8.7:

Site Response from Incident Pnl Waves

2008 Monitoring Research Review: Ground-Based Nuclear Explosion Monitoring Technologies TOWARD A RAYLEIGH WAVE ATTENUATION MODEL FOR ASIA

THE ALTERNATIVE APPROACH FOR SEISMIC MONITORING DATA IDENTIFICATION EXCLUDING MASTER EVENTS

Introduction to SEISAN and Computer exercises in processing earthquake data

U.S. Department of the Interior. Geological Survey. Experiments with SRO and GRF-array data. George L. Choy. Open-File Report

25th Seismic Research Review - Nuclear Explosion Monitoring: Building the Knowledge Base

AGN 008 Vibration DESCRIPTION. Cummins Generator Technologies manufacture ac generators (alternators) to ensure compliance with BS 5000, Part 3.

Guided Wave Travel Time Tomography for Bends

PASSIVE ACOUSTIC AND SEISMIC TOMOGRAPHY WITH OCEAN AMBIENT NOISE IN ORION

The Idea of the Early Warning

Datasheet DS USGS NEIC-data: OT 11:56: N 23.55E h = 10km mb = 5.8

A TECHNIQUE FOR AUTOMATIC DETECTION OF ONSET TIME OF P- AND S-PHASES IN STRONG MOTION RECORDS

29th Monitoring Research Review: Ground-Based Nuclear Explosion Monitoring Technologies

Green s Function Extraction from Ambient Seismic Field: Analysis of Seasonal Variations

Micro-Seismic Interpretation of Hydraulic Fracture Treatments. Hans de Pater Pinnacle Technologies Delft

Infrasonic Observations of the Hekla Eruption of February 26, 2000

Transcription:

Retrieving Focal Mechanism of Earthquakes Using the CAP Method Hongfeng Yang April 11, 2013 1 Introduction Waveforms recorded at a seismic station, W (t), compose of three components: W (t) = S(t) G(t) I(t), (1) where S(t) represents the source, G(t) stands for the Green s functions, and I(t) is the instrument response. Therefore, retrieving source parameters of one earthquake S(t) requires deconvolving instrument response I(t) and Green s functions G(t) from the actual data W (t). We generally remove instrument responses after obtaining the waveform data. Therefore, we have the data in displacement or in velocity, u(t) = S(t) G(t). The corresponding synthetic displacement s(t) for a douple-couple source can be expressed as s(t) = M 0 Ai (φ θ, δ, λ)g i (t), (2) where G i are the Green s functions, A i are the radiation coefficients, and φ is the station azimuth, M 0 is scalar moment, θ, δ, and λ are strike, dip, and rake, respectively. Then we perform a grid search in all possible solutions of strike, dip, and rake to obtain the best fit by finding the minimal residual between the data and synthetics. This procedure consists of the following three steps, (1) computing Green s functions, (2) preparing data seismograms, and (3) deriving focal mechanism solutions. This tutorial will mostly cover step (3). Here we compute focal mechanism solutions using the Cut and Paste method (CAP) [Zhu and Helmberger, 16]. This method decomposes seismograms and uses amplitude information in different time windows (e.g., P nl/surface wave) to increase the stability and resolution of focal mechanism solution. Please refer to [Zhu and Helmberger, 16] for details of the CAP method. The earthquake example used in this tutorial is the 2008 Illinois M w 5.2 earthquake. It is a left-lateral strike-slip event based on focal mechanism solutions and aftershock locations [Yang et al., 2009]. 2 Procedure 2.1 Computing Green s functions The Green s functions are computed using a Haskell propagator matrix (fk) method [Zhu and Rivera, 2002]. An appropriate 1-D velocity model is needed to compute Green s functions. In this tutorial, we use a 1-D velocity model for central US. 1

The Green s functions are named as xxx.grn.[0-8] where xxx is the distance. All Green s functions from one source depth are placed in a single directory named as model depth. They are in SAC format with two time marks set: t1 for the first P arrival and t2 for the first S arrival. All Green s functions have been computed using a velocity model of cus and are put in the directory: /home/hyang/teaching/captut/glib/cus. 2.2 Preparing seismogram In this tutorial I use the 2008/04/18 earthquake as an example and have already processed waveform data as required by the CAP. All the processed data are located at /home/hyang/teaching/captut/20080418093700. The waveform data can be requested from IRIS and processed by your own. One needs to process the data as the following. 1. General processing Waveforms must be in SAC format with header information including event latitude and longitude, station latitude and longitude. Reference time shall be set at origin time. Epicentral distance and azimuth should also be set. I filtered the waveforms from 0.5 to 2 Hz. Generally you need to apply a filter from 5-10 seconds to a few Hz, depending on the magnitude of the event. The smaller the event is, the higher the frequency band can be applied. 2. Remove instrument responses Three-component seismograms need to be in velocity with units of cm/s or displacement in cm in order to obtain meaningful magnitudes. 3. Cut and rotate Waveforms at each station need to be cut into same length, and named as r, t, z convention. The two horizontal components shall be rotated. 4. Arrival header information You need to pick first P arrival time at each station and save it to A in the sac header. 2.3 CAP The source codes of the CAP package are from Dr. Lupei Zhu at Saint Louis University. The main code is written in C and the compilation requires a number of dependencies and environmental settings. Pre-compiled executable, cap, is located in /home/hyang/bin on the computers in the geophysics lab. The input file for the original executable, cap, is rather complicated. Dr. Zhu generously provides a user-friendly script, cap.pl, to use the CAP with ease. In this tutorial, we will only use cap.pl. To use the above command and scripts, add /home/hyang/bin and /home/hyang/src/cap into your directory. 1. weight.dat Before we run cap.pl, we need to prepare the weight.dat file under the event directory. This file is in the following format: station name dist w1 w2 w3 w4 w5 tp ts. 2

It contains station information and weights for different time windows during the moment tensor inversion. The dist specifies the names of Green s functions (in format of dist.grn.?) to be used. w1 to w5 are the weights for 5 segments of waveforms: PnlZ, PnlR, Z, R, T. tp is first P arrival time if it s set to a positive value. ts is the initial time shift for the surface waves, positive meaning that the data is delayed. If w2 is set to -1, it indicates that the station is at teleseimic distances and only the P (PnlZ) and SH (T) are used. In this case, ts is the S arrival time when it is positive. To turn off certain components, e.g. parameters (w1-w5) to be 0. 2. Options in cap.pl surface waves, then set the corresponding weighting There are many options for running cap.pl. Please refer to cap.pl for details. 3. Output The inversion results are saved in a file named model depth.out, where model represents the velocity model and depth stands for the focal depth at which a grid search of strike, dip, and rake is performed. The first line of model depth.out is in the following format: Event 20080418093700 Model cus 15 FM 115 90-2 Mw 5.19 rms 1.341e-02 110 ERR 1 3 4. This means that the best-fit fault plane solution is strike 115, dip 90, and rake -2 degrees, with the axial lengths of the 1-σ error ellipsoid of 1, 3, and 4 degrees. The rest of the output file shows rms, cross-correlation coef., and time shift of individual waveforms starting with station epicentral distance/constant shift. cap.pl will also generate a plot of waveforms at each stations (Figure 1). 4. Find best-fit focal depth Usually the grid search needs to be performed for a number of focal depths, such as 5, 10, 15, 20, and 25 km. At each depth, cap will generate an output file. There is a script to extract the best fit focal depth by taking all output files together. See /home/hyang/teaching/captut/getdepth.sh The results are shown in Figure 2. References Yang, H., L. Zhu, and R. Chu, Fault-plane determination of the 18 April 2008 Mt. Carmel, Illinois, earthquake by detecting and relocating aftershocks, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., (6), 3413 3420, doi:10.1785/0120090038, 2009. Zhu, L., and D. V. Helmberger, Advancement in source estimation techniques using broadband regional seismograms, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 86, 1634 1641, 16. Zhu, L., and L. A. Rivera, A note on the dynamic and static displacements from a point source in multi-layered media, Geophys. J. Int., 148, 619 627, 2002. 3

Event 20080418093700 Model cus_15 FM 2 90 2 Mw 5.21 rms 2.007e-02 308 ERR 1 2 2 ISO 9 1 P V P R Surf. V Surf R SH IU_WCI 141.7/-1.35 0.80 0.80 1.80 92 1.80 1.20 96 NM_SIUC 142.2/-1.05 82 80 NM_BLO 143.3/-1.10 86 91 87 NM_SLM 205.6/-0.37 64 55-0.80-0.80 NM_FVM 228.0/-0.43 34 74 86 87 0.40 89 IU_WVT 257.5/-1.11 70 81-75 - 76 98 NM_PVMO 277.0/0.85-33 - 46 92 57 98 IU_CCM 296.9/0.69 55 74-97 Figure 1: An example plot of CAP solutions. 4

100 80 60 40 20 0 0 20080418093700 h=14.6 0.4 5.21 Figure 2: An example plot of best fit depth. 5