Technology and Manufacturing Readiness Levels [Draft]

Similar documents
Applying for and reporting FFI projects

Jerome Tzau TARDEC System Engineering Group. UNCLASSIFIED: Distribution Statement A. Approved for public release. 14 th Annual NDIA SE Conf Oct 2011

Turning low carbon propulsion technologies into products developed in the UK

Moving from R&D to Manufacture

Moving from R&D to Manufacture

TRLs and MRLs: Supporting NextFlex PC 2.0

Manufacturing Readiness Level Deskbook

Technology & Manufacturing Readiness RMS

A Roadmap for Connected & Autonomous Vehicles. David Skipp Ford Motor Company

Meet the (Innovation) Funder

DMTC Guideline - Technology Readiness Levels

Navigating the Healthcare Innovation Cycle

ARTES Competitiveness & Growth Full Proposal. Requirements for the Content of the Technical Proposal. Part 3B Product Development Plan

THEFUTURERAILWAY THE INDUSTRY S RAIL TECHNICAL STRATEGY 2012 INNOVATION

Manufacturing Readiness Level (MRL) Deskbook Version 2016

Other Transaction Authority (OTA)

Manufacturing Readiness Assessment (MRA) Deskbook

Dr George Gillespie. CEO HORIBA MIRA Ltd. Sponsors

Manufacturing Readiness Assessment Overview

Examples of Public Procurement of R&D services within EU funded Security Research actions

Technology readiness applied to materials for fusion applications

Manufacturing Readiness Assessments of Technology Development Projects

Surrey Knowledge Transfer Account

A Science & Innovation Audit for the West Midlands

GEAR 2030 WORKING GROUP 2 Roadmap on automated and connected vehicles

Riser Lifecycle Monitoring System (RLMS) for Integrity Management

EU Support for SME Innovation: The SME Instrument

Aerospace Software* Cost and Timescale Reduction *and complex electronic hardware

Robotics in Horizon 2020 ICT Work Programme

Transitioning Technology to Naval Ships. Dr. Norbert Doerry Technical Director, SEA 05 Technology Group SEA05TD

TRL Corollaries for Practice-Based Technologies

How technology can enable the fourth industrial revolution. Lynne McGregor 28 February 2018

Ai Group Submission. in response to the REVIEW OF ELECTRICITY (CONSUMER SAFETY) ACT 2004 ISSUES PAPER

Transmission Innovation Strategy

Business Models Summary 12/12/2017 1

APEC Internet and Digital Economy Roadmap

Technology Roadmapping An Overview for MAA Thrust Area Work Groups

Guidance on TRL for renewable energy technologies

Trends in the Defense Industrial Base. Office of the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense Manufacturing and Industrial Base Policy

A EUROCONTROL View on the Research Needs & the Network of Centres of Excellence

High Value Manufacturing Catapult

Arshad Mansoor, Sr. Vice President, Research & Development INNOVATION SCOUTS: EXPANDING EPRI S TECHNOLOGY INNOVATION NETWORK

Innovation Management & Technology Transfer Innovation Management & Technology Transfer

Electronics the hidden sector. Dr Kathryn Walsh Director, Electronics-enabled Products KTN

Assessment of Smart Machines and Manufacturing Competence Centre (SMACC) Scientific Advisory Board Site Visit April 2018.

Manufacturing Readiness Levels (MRLs) Manufacturing Readiness Assessments (MRAs) In an S&T Environment

The role of Lidar in offshore wind measurement

Transmission Innovation Strategy

U.S. ARMY RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT AND ENGINEERING COMMAND

Guidelines: Review and evaluation of high-end infrastructure proposals and award of funding allocations

Reducing Manufacturing Risk Manufacturing Readiness Levels

Understand that technology has different levels of maturity and that lower maturity levels come with higher risks.

Mid Term Exam SES 405 Exploration Systems Engineering 3 March Your Name

Low Carbon Vehicles Innovation Platform

Intermediate Systems Acquisition Course. Lesson 2.2 Selecting the Best Technical Alternative. Selecting the Best Technical Alternative

SESAR EXPLORATORY RESEARCH. Dr. Stella Tkatchova 21/07/2015

Where smart, connected and autonomous vehicles come to life

Manufacturing Readiness Levels (MRLs) and Manufacturing Readiness Assessments (MRAs)

learning progression diagrams

Clean Energy Smart Manufacturing Innovation Institute

Air Force Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) Program

Manufacturing Systems Engineering Key Expertise Theme. astutewales.com

The Value of Membership.

The marginalisation of cross-cutting issues in CCUS Mission Innovation PRDs

GUIDELINE DOCUMENT FOR FUNDING APPLICATION

REQUEST FOR INFORMATION (RFI) United States Marine Corps Experimental Forward Operating Base (ExFOB) 2014

DfT Maritime Directorate Our work on port policy

Leverage 3D Master. Improve Cost and Quality throughout the Product Development Process

TIA Overview (Offerings & Funding Application Process) TIA Eastern Cape Roadshow August 18, 2016

EXPEN$IVE. abundant. lucrative CHALLENGING $$$ Curious? See Next Page. FACT 1 Space activity is: FACT 2 Business Models are: Evolving

Technology readiness evaluations for fusion materials science & technology

Engaging UK Climate Service Providers a series of workshops in November 2014

Technology Readiness Assessment of Department of Energy Waste Processing Facilities: When is a Technology Ready for Insertion?

WAVE & TIDAL SERVICES WAVE & TIDAL

Intellectual Property, Vaccine Production and Technology Transfer

Conclusions on the future of information and communication technologies research, innovation and infrastructures

Office of Small and Medium Enterprises (OSME) Bureau des petites et moyennes entreprises (BPME)

ARTES Competitiveness & Growth Full Proposal. Requirements for the Content of the Technical Proposal

Accelerating the Introduction of CAVs through Appropriate Testing Professor Paul Jennings. September 12th 2018

COSMOS 2020 Infoday Bratislava Space Call 2015

Constructing our future. Product Improvement and Innovation Strategy

Six steps to measurable design. Matt Bernius Lead Experience Planner. Kristin Youngling Sr. Director, Data Strategy

Västra Götaland pilot project (I)

Committee on Astrobiology & Planetary Science (CAPS) Michael H. New, PhD Astrobiology Discipline Scientist

Three dimensions of maturity required to achieve future state, technology enabled manufacturing. supply chains

Pre-commercial procurement in robotics HORIZON ICT 27(d)

Impact and Innovation in H2020 Proposals and projects

Horizon Work Programme Leadership in enabling and industrial technologies - Introduction

Driving down the costs of decommissioning through technology. Malcolm Banks & Susi Wiseman Offshore Decommissioning Conference, November 2017

The Sherwin-Williams Company

National Policy Implications

ECSEL JU Update. Andreas Wild Executive Director

Findings of the Artist2 Workshop Beyond Autosar

Technology Readiness for the Smart Grid

NERA Innovation Cluster Workshop Miranda Taylor, November 2016

Facilitate. Collaborate. Innovate.

The Role of Public Procurement in Low-carbon Innovation in Infrastructure

Wave Energy Systems Technology Readiness Levels ESBIoe-WAV Rev. 2 Oct 2012

Climate Change Innovation and Technology Framework 2017

scinnovation-global.com Innovative Engineering Robust Solutions

Transcription:

MC-P-10-53 This paper provides a set of scales indicating the state of technological development of a technology and its readiness for manufacture, derived from similar scales in the military and aerospace sectors and developed in consultation with the Automotive Council. It is for approval prior to adoption by Automotive Council. Technology and Manufacturing Readiness Levels [Draft] A Guide to Recognised Stages of Development Version 5.3

Published by Automotive Council Produced by LowCVP The authors Roy Williamson (LowCVP) and Jon Beasley (GKN) wish to thank and acknowledge the support contributed by the UK automotive sector in developing this guide. Introduction to Technology and Manufacturing Readiness Levels A recurring issue to developers and adopters of new technologies lies in managing and communicating the expectations for different stages of technology development and establishment of manufacturing capability. The aim of a set of Automotive TRLs and MRLs is to help facilitate technology commercialisation, engaging suppliers, partners and customers at suitable stages, accelerating time to market and reducing costs, through the use of a common understanding. Readiness levels have proven their usefulness in the aerospace and defence sectors, which involve similar supply chain structure to those of the automotive sector. TRLs and MRLs provide a common language to define technology from concept, to commercial production and through to End of Life disposal. The use of standard terminology and understandings can assist with selfreview, programme development, knowledge and research transactions and collaboration. Benefits Using common scales and terms allows: Emergent supply chain companies to have a framework through which they can better understand the engagement needs of TIer1s/VMs. VMs, Tier1s and Funding agencies are presented with clearer definition of propositions and their development status. A framework which can be used to provide clearer direction regarding engagement of the most appropriate public sector support An investment Framework for angels/vc investor engagement. Self assessment provides guidance on next steps (trials, certification etc) relevant to their Level and could also signpost sources of support suitable to the various stages. Industry bodies to better define the status of development portfolios in supporting industry roadmaps. Integrated Assemblies When technologies are brought together and integrated, TRL and MRLs of individual components contribute to the readiness of the assembly overall, helping to assess risks, develop strategies and plan resources. It could be the case that integrated systems may hold more than one TRL / MRL status, recognising the development of the next generation or derivatives of a product with respect to the currently established product.

TRL Technology Readiness MRL Manufacturing Readiness 1 Basic Principles have been observed and reported. Scientific Research and beginning of translation into applied research and development. Paper studies and experimentation Performance/capabilities have been predicted. 2 Speculative applications have been identified Ongoing exploration into key principles Application specific simulations/experiments Performance predictions have been refined 3 Analytical and experimental identify critical functionality and/or characteristics Analytical and laboratory studies physically validate predictions of separate elements of the technology. Examples include components that are not yet integrated or representative. Performance is investigated through analytical experimentation and/or simulations. 4 Technology component and/or basic subsystem have been validated in the laboratory / test house Basic concept has been observed in other industry sectors (eg Space, Aerospace), potential transition opportunity if it can adapted to industry requirements (Volume and cost) Examples include integration of ad hoc hardware in a laboratory / test house. Requirements and interactions with relevant vehicle systems determined. 5 Technology component and/or basic subsystem validated in relevant environment (potentially through a mule or adapted current production vehicle). Basic technological components are integrated with reasonably realistic supporting elements so that the technology can be tested with equipment that can simulate and validate all system specifications within a laboratory / test house / test track setting with integrated components Design rules established. Performance results demonstrate viability and confidence to select for new vehicle programme consideration. High level assessment of manufacturing opportunities 1 Basic Manufacturing Implications Identified. Materials for manufacturing characterised and assessed. 2 Manufacturing Concepts Identified. Manufacturing feasibility determined and processes identified. Produce-ability assessments commenced, including advanced design for manufacturing considerations. 3 Manufacturing Proof of Concept developed Analytical or laboratory experiments validate paper studies. Experimental hardware or processes have been created, but are not yet integrated or representative. Materials and/or processes have been characterized for manufacturability and availability. Initial Manufacturing cost projections Supply chain requirements determined.

6 Technology system/ subsystem model or prototype demonstration as part of a vehicle that can simulate and validate all system specifications within a test house, test track or similar operational Performance results viability for specific vehicle class. 7 Multiple prototypes demonstrated in an operational, on-vehicle Performance of technology meets requirements. Limit testing and ultimate performance characteristics now determined. Technology suitable to be incorporated into specific vehicle platform development programmes. 8 Test and demonstration phases completed to customer satisfaction. Technology has been proven to work in its final form and under expected conditions. Performance is validated, and confirmed Pre-production vehicle status. 4 Capability to produce the technology in a laboratory or prototype Required Series production investments, such as manufacturing technology development identified. Processes to ensure manufacturability, producibility and quality are in place and are sufficient to produce demonstrators. Manufacturing risks identified for prototype build. Cost drivers confirmed. Design concepts optimised for production. APQP processes scoped and initiated. 5 Capability to produce prototype components in a production relevant Critical technologies and components are identified. Prototype materials, tooling and test equipment, as well as personnel skills have been demonstrated on components in a production relevant environment FMEA and DFMA initiated. 6 Capability to produce integrated system or subsystem in a production relevant Majority of manufacturing processes have been defined and characterized. Preliminary design of critical components completed. Prototype materials, tooling and test equipment, as well as personnel skills have been demonstrated on subsystems/ systems in a production relevant Detailed cost analysis includes design trades. Cost targets allocated and approved as viable. Producibility considerations shape system development plans. Long lead and key supply chain elements identified.

9 Actual technology system qualified through operational experience. Actual application of the technology in its final form and under real-world conditions. Real-world performance of the technology is successful. Vehicle / product launch into the market place Scaled up/down technology in development for other classes of vehicle. 7 Capability to produce systems, subsystems or components in a production representative Material specifications are approved. Materials available to meet planned pilot line build schedule. Pilot line capability demonstrated including run at rate capability Unit cost reduction efforts underway. Supply chain and supplier QA assessed. Long lead procurement plans in place. Production tooling and test equipment design & development initiated FMEA and DFMA completed. 8 Initial production underway Manufacturing and quality processes and procedures proven in production environment, Initial / Early supply chain established and stable. Manufacturing processes are validated. 9 Full / Volume rate Production capability demonstrated. Major system design features are stable and proven in test and evaluation. Materials are available to meet planned rate production schedules. Manufacturing processes and procedures are established and controlled to threesigma or some other appropriate quality level to meet design key characteristic tolerances in a low rate production Manufacturing control processes validated. Actual cost model developed for full rate production

10 The technology is successfully in service in multiple application forms vehicle platforms and geographic regions. In-service and life time warranty data is available, confirming actual market life time performance and reliability 10 Full Rate Production demonstrated Lean production practices in place and continuous process improvements ongoing. Engineering/design changes limited to quality and cost improvements. System, components or items are in rate production and meet all engineering, performance, quality and reliability requirements. All materials, manufacturing processes and procedures, inspection and test equipment are in production and controlled to sixsigma or some other appropriate quality level. Unit cost meets goal, applicable to multiple markets, manufacturing capability globally deployable. Continuous improvement to processes and planning.

Examples Composite Structures (for automotive applications) TRL Technology Readiness MRL Manufacturing Readiness 8 Customer test and demonstration 4 Capability to produce the technology in a phases successfully completed. laboratory or prototype Technology has been proven to work in Required Series production investments, its final form and under expected conditions. such as manufacturing technology development identified. Performance is validated, and Processes to ensure manufacturability, confirmed design rules established. Pre-production vehicle status. producibility and quality are in place and are sufficient to produce demonstrators. Manufacturing risks identified for prototype build. Cost drivers confirmed. Producibility assessments of design concepts have been completed. Key design performance parameters confirmed through testing. APQP processes scoped and initiated. ABS (for multiple vehicle class, automotive applications) TRL Technology Readiness MRL Manufacturing Readiness 10 The technology is successfully in service 10 Full Rate Production demonstrated in multiple application forms vehicle Lean production practices in place and platforms and geographic regions. Inservice and life time warranty data is going. continuous process improvements on- available, confirming actual market life Engineering/design changes limited to time performance and reliability quality and cost improvements. System, components or items are in rate production and meet all engineering, performance, quality and reliability requirements. All materials, manufacturing processes and procedures, inspection and test equipment are in production and controlled to sixsigma or some other appropriate quality level. Unit cost meets goal, applicable to multiple markets, manufacturing capability globally deployable. Continuous improvement to processes and planning.