Planetary Science Division Update

Similar documents
U.S. Space Exploration in the Next 20 NASA Space Sciences Policy

Decadal Survey Process and Mars Program Introduction

NASA Mars Exploration Program Update to the Planetary Science Subcommittee

Technology Capabilities and Gaps Roadmap

Technology Capabilities and Gaps Roadmap

The International Lunar Network (ILN) and the US Anchor Nodes mission

Technologies for Outer Solar System Exploration

Uranus Exploration Challenges

VEXAG Report. Planetary Science Subcommittee Meeting June, Ellen Stofan

Reducing the Challenges Posed by Titan Missions

Planetary CubeSats, nanosatellites and sub-spacecraft: are we all talking about the same thing?

Overview of Recent Lunar Robotic Science and Exploration Studies at JPL

Ocean Worlds Robert D. Braun

Planetary Decadal Steering Committee Meeting February 22-24, Open Sessions

Planetary Science Sub-committee Meeting. 9 July

Planetary Protection Subcommittee Mars Brief May 1, 2012 Doug McCuistion Director, Mars Exploration Program

The JPL A-Team and Mission Formulation Process

Planetary Protection, NASA, the Science Mission Directorate, and Everything

Benefiting government, industry and the public through innovative science and technology

ESA Human Spaceflight Capability Development and Future Perspectives International Lunar Conference September Toronto, Canada

The CNES French Space Agency Planetary Program Low cost perspectives

The Mars Exploration Program

Daring Mighty Things. AFCEA Los Angeles. Larry James (Lt. Gen. USAF, Ret.), Deputy Director. a presentation to. January 14, 2015

Exploration Systems Mission Directorate: New Opportunities in the President s FY2011 Budget

NASA s Space Launch System: Powering the Journey to Mars. FISO Telecon Aug 3, 2016

Planetary Science Division Status. Jim Adams September 14, 2010

OPAG Responses to AO RFI RPS-Related Submissions

International Planetary Probe Workshop. Presentation to VEXAG

PLANETARY SCIENCE SUBCOMMITTEE. March 12, 2014 NASA Headquarters Washington, D.C.

NASA s X2000 Program - an Institutional Approach to Enabling Smaller Spacecraft

Mission to Earth Moon Lagrange Point by a 6U CubeSat: EQUULEUS

Dan Dvorak and Lorraine Fesq Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology. Jonathan Wilmot NASA Goddard Space Flight Center

Meeting the Challenge of Low Cost Lunar Exploration

Europa Lander Science Definition Team Update

PSD Technology Planning. Pat Beauchamp, JPL-Caltech Leonard Dudzinski, NASA PSD

LLCD Accomplishments No Issues with Atmospheric Effects like Fading and Turbulence. Transmitting Data at 77 Mbps < 5 above the horizon

Planetary Science Division Significant Changes

March 3-4, 2008 Carnegie Institute Washington, D.C.

Navigation and Ancillary Information Facility What s Up at NAIF? Chuck Acton August 2010 Rev. 1

NASA Mission Directorates

MSL Lessons Learned Study. Presentation to NAC Planetary Protection Subcommittee April 29, 2013 Mark Saunders, Study Lead

The Global Exploration Roadmap International Space Exploration Coordination Group (ISECG)

Low-Cost Innovation in the U.S. Space Program: A Brief History

NASA and Earth Science Enterprise Overview

Analysis of European Architectures for Space Exploration

Voyage to Mars Space Simulation

Penetrators for Europa

Lisa Pratt, MEPAG Chair Report to PSS March 10-11, 2016

Planetary R&A Review Charge and Expectations. Jim Green NASA, Planetary Science Division May 12, 2016

Thomas H. Zurbuchen Associate

National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Robotics for Space Exploration Today and Tomorrow. Chris Scolese NASA Associate Administrator March 17, 2010

Future DSN Capabilities

Deep Space cubesats a nanosats at JPL. Tony Freeman Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology

National Aeronautics and Space Administration. The Planetary Science Technology Review Panel Final Report Summary

Outpost Optimizing Science & Exploration Working Group (OSEWG) - Lunar Surface Science Scenarios

Update on ESA Planetary Protection Activities

Near Earth Asteroid (NEA) Scout CubeSat Mission

Future Plans for the Deep Space Network (DSN)

Overview of Recent CAPS Meeting. Christopher House Bill McKinnon. CAPS Co-chairs. SSB Meeting May 2, 2016

Call for Ideas. for the Next Exploration Science and Technology Mission of the European Space Exploration Programme - Aurora

NanoSwarm: CubeSats Enabling a Discovery Class Mission Jordi Puig-Suari Tyvak Nano-Satellite Systems

Panel Session IV - Future Space Exploration

HEOMD Update NRC Aeronautics and Space Engineering Board Oct. 16, 2014

Guidance, Navigation, and Control Technology Assessment for Future Planetary Science Missions

AstroBus S, the high performance and competitive Small Satellites platform for Earth Observation

Lecture 27: The Future of Space Exploration

Future Directions: Strategy for Human and Robotic Exploration. Gary L. Martin Space Architect

Science Plenary II: Science Missions Enabled by Nuclear Power and Propulsion. Chair / Organizer: Steven D. Howe Center for Space Nuclear Research

Model-based Systems Engineering Mission Formulation and Implementation

Solar System Exploration Decadal Survey: Mars Panel Tempe, AZ Sept 9-11 Serina Diniega, University of Arizona

CubeSat Proximity Operations Demonstration (CPOD) Mission Update Cal Poly CubeSat Workshop San Luis Obispo, CA

Mars Exploration Program Status Planetary Sciences Subcommittee of NAC 9 July 2009 Doug McCuistion Mars Exploration Program, Director

Future DSN Capabilities

JHU/APL CubeSat Initiatives. Andy Lewin 19 April 2007

RETURN TO THE LUNAR SURFACE Lunar Exploration Campaign. Next COTS Project?

Office of Chief Technologist - Space Technology Program Dr. Prasun Desai Office of the Chief Technologist May 1, 2012

JPL Spectrum Management Process

National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Chair, Planetary Science Subcommittee. of the NASA Advisory Council

National Aeronautics and Space Administration Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology

NASA Keynote to International Lunar Conference Mark S. Borkowski Program Executive Robotic Lunar Exploration Program

C. R. Weisbin, R. Easter, G. Rodriguez January 2001

Enabling Technologies for robotic and human Exploration

An Explore Mars BE BOLD technical project. Sanford Morton Emily Briere Cassidy Chan


SmallSat Access to Space

Asteroid Redirect Mission and Human Exploration. William H. Gerstenmaier NASA Associate Administrator for Human Exploration and Operations

ESA PREPARATION FOR HUMAN LUNAR EXPLORATION. Scott Hovland European Space Agency, HME-HFH, ESTEC,

SPACE STUDIES BOARD MEETING NASA Science Overview. Thomas H. Zurbuchen Associate Administrator Science Mission Directorate,

NASA s Human Space Exploration Capability Driven Framework

Robotics in Space. Ian Taylor MP. Co-Chair, UK Parliamentary Space Committee VIIIth European Interparliamentary Space Conference

Small Body Technology Roadmap

For Winter /12/2006

BEYOND LOW-EARTH ORBIT

Exploration Systems Research & Technology

Science Enabled by the Return to the Moon (and the Ares 5 proposal)

G/MOWG Report to HPS. 7 July 2006 Presented by tbd

Introduction to Principles of Autonomy and Decision Making. Today s Assignment

Planetary Protection at NASA: Overview and Status

NASA Mars Science Laboratory Mission: Safety Review. Sayavur I. Bakhtiyarov, PhD, DSc US Air Force Safety Center Space Safety Division

Transcription:

Planetary Science Division Update Jim Adams Deputy Director, Planetary Science NASA Headquarters May 10, 2011 Presentation to the Planetary Protection Subcommittee

Outline PSD Plan to Respond to the Decadal Survey Recent Discovery Selections

Planetary Program Architecture Recommended by the Planetary Decadal Survey Large Missions ( Flagship -scale) Recommended Program (budget increase for JEO new start) 1) Mars Astrobiology Explorer-Cacher descoped 2) Jupiter Europa Orbiter (JEO) descoped 3) Uranus Orbiter & Probe (UOP) 4/5) Enceladus Orbiter & Venus Climate Mission Cost Constrained Program (based on FY11 Request) 1) Mars Astrobiology Explorer- Cacher descoped 2) Uranus Orbiter & Probe (UOP) Less favorable budget picture than assumed (e.g., outyears in FY12 request) Descope or delay Flagship mission Discovery $500M (FY15) cap per mission (exclusive of launch vehicle) and 24 month cadence for selection New Frontiers $1B (FY15) cap per mission (exclusive of launch vehicle) with two selections during 2013-22 Research & Analysis (5% above final FY11 amount then ~1.5%/yr) Technology Development (6-8%) Current Commitments (ie: Operating Missions)

Planetary Funding Profiles FY11 and FY12 Requests President s FY11 Budget + inflation Decadal planning budget R&A President s FY12 Budget* Disco NF Lunar Assumed Flat Budget Mars *Notional Budget in RY$ Outer Planets

Decadal Decision Rules Page 9-6: NASA s suite of planetary missions should consist of a balanced mix of Discovery, New Frontiers, and Flagship missions, enabling both a steady stream of new discoveries and challenges Page 9-21: It is also possible that the budget picture could turn out to be less favorable If cuts to the program are necessary, the committee recommends that the first approach should be descoping or delaying Flagship missions. Changes to the New Frontiers or Discovery programs should be considered only if adjustments to Flagship missions cannot solve the problem. Actions based on Decadal Guidance: Maintain a balanced program small, medium, large missions Maintain a partnership with ESA Descope flagship missions as a first resort due to tight budgets If flagship descopes are not sufficient then stretch out New Frontiers and Discovery A/Os

PSD Decadal Budget Planning Lay In Current Commitments All Operating Missions Through Expected End of Life Current R&A Awards All missions in development or competition Juno, GRAIL, MSL, LADEE, MAVEN, EMTGO New Frontiers-3, and Discovery 12 In-Space Propulsion Technology Radioisotope Power System Program Pu-238 Production Accommodate Decadal Recommendations Maintain a healthy R&A program Discovery AO s on 2 year Cadence New Frontiers AO s on 5 year Cadence Mars 2018 Cache Rover Directly Tied to MSR Includes initiation of MSR high-priority technologies wedge Per OMB $10M/year set aside for cooperative activities with Human Exploration Full decadal recommendations greatly exceed President s FY12 Budget Must use decision rules from decadal to develop a balanced budget

Approach to Develop new Notional Budget Capped R&A at $200M/year Next Discovery AO on current <36 month cadence All subsequent AO s accelerated to 24 Month Cycle Select NF-3 planned for NF-4 and NF-5 within decade Will maintain New Frontiers schedule Extended Mission budget for ALL operating missions Senior Review used for determining which missions to be extended Dedicated Lunar R&A wedge transferred to PSD R&A Residual Lunar Quest Program moved to Discovery JEO Descoped to Studies Funded FY11/12 No JEO Instrument AO Budget for some radiation technology efforts

Overall Program Content Mars Exploration Program (Negotiated with ESA) EMTGO, MOMA, Mars 2018 (JR-1), Management, Future missions Discovery Program Strofio, LaRa, Disc-12, Management, Future missions New Frontiers Program NF-3, Management, Future missions Technology Program PIDDP, ASTID, ISP, RPS, MSR Tech, OP Tech Planetary R&A Move PIDDP and ASTID to Technology Program Mission Commitments (operating etc.) GRAIL, Juno, MSL, MAVEN, LADEE, MER, MRO, Odyssey, Mars Express, Dawn, New Horizons, LRO, MESSENGER, Deep Impact, Stardust, ASPERA-3, Rosetta, Cassini Other Commitments Pu-238, AMMOS, OPF studies, JGO/ESA MOO, Joint coordination w/hsf Operating Development In Competition

9 A PSD Notional Decadal Budget

Road to Response March 7, 2011 Decadal Survey Released at LPSC April 5, 2011 Response Strategy Briefing to OMB Budget Guidelines and DS Objectives Reconciled Cataloging of Recommendations (200+) Completed Consolidated into 37 Actionable Recommendations Writing Assignments May 6, 2011 Rough Draft Assembled June 12, 2011 Draft Supplied to PSS June 26, 2011 PSS Comments on PSD Response July, 2011 Final Response Delivered to NRC

Discovery 12 Selections

031- CHopper: Comet Hopper PI: Jessica M. Sunshine Mission & Science Team: PI: Jessica Sunshine, UMD Deputy PI: M. A Hearn, UMD Project Management: GSFC S/C: LM Mission Ops: LM Science Ops: UMD Mission: Comet Wirtanen rendezvous and landing mission using LM S/C. 4 sorties between 4.5 and 1.5 AU from Sun. Goals: Map spatial heterogeneity of gas & dust emissions and surface solids Determine nucleus structure, geologic processes, coma mechanisms Document changes w/ increasing isolation Instruments: CHIRS- CHopper Infrared Spectrometer CHIMS- CHopper Ion/Neutral Mass Spectrometer CHI- CHopper Imager CHEX- CHopper Heating Experiment PanCams- Panoramic Cameras Mission Details: Flight: 2016 launch with Standard 4m LV, 34-day launch period Mission: 7.3-yr mission, 2022 rendezvous / science ops Science Phase: Remote survey and multiple in situ surface measurements Cruise/Parked Ops: Quiescent ops during cruise and between sorties, science data downlink Spacecraft: high-heritage spacecraft design, flightproven components for reliability and long life, large systems margins, dust covers for robustness in cometary environment, two ASRGs supply continuous power during all mission phases 12

008- GEMS: GEophysical Monitoring Station PI: Bruce Banerdt Mission & Science Team: PI: Bruce Banerdt, JPL PM: Tom Hoffman, JPL Deputy PI: Sue Smrekar, JPL Spacecraft: Lockheed-Martin (LM) Operations: JPL/LM Payload: JPL, IPGP (France), DLR (Germany) Mission: Geophysical (seismology, heat flow, planetary rotation) lander mission on Mars using Phoenix heritage spacecraft Goals: Understand formation/evolution of terrestrial planets via interior structure/processes of Mars Determine present tectonic activity and meteorite impact rate Payload: Seismic Experiment for Interior Structure (SEIS) Rotation & Interior Structure Experiment (RISE) Heat Flow & Physical Properties Probe (HP 3 ) Instrument Deployment Arm (IDA) Instrument Deployment Camera (IDC) Mission Details: Flight: 3/2016 launch w/elv, 4m fairing; 9/2016 landing; ~6.5 mo cruise, 1 Mars yr surface ops Selected Systems Features (Phoenix-based design): Cruise: 3-axis stabilized, 3.2 m 2 UTJ solar array, X- band telecom; EDL: Landing radar, UHF telecom; Surface: 4.3 m 2 UTJ solar array, 2 Li-ion batteries, UHF telecom, Rad 750-based avionics Mass: 597.6kg dry launch, margin 31% (depending on ELV) Surface Ops Energy: 881Wh/sol, margin 180% Schedule: 39 mo B/C/D, 98 days sched reserve Threshold Mission: Descope: HP 3, SEIS SP sensors 13

TiME: Titan Mare Explorer PI: Ellen Stofan Mission & Science Team: PI: Ellen Stofan, Proxemy Project Mgmt: APL S/C: LM Ops: LM, JPL (nav) Payload: APL, GSFC, MSSS Deputy PI: J. Lunine, UA Project Scientist: R. Lorenz, APL Mission: Lander msn to Titan s Ligeia Mare methaneethane polar sea, 96 days on surface Goals: Understand Titan s methane cycle through study of a Titan sea. Investigate Titan s history & explore the limits of life Instruments: Meteorology & physical properties (MP3) Mass Spec for Lake Chemistry (NMS), Descent and Surface Imaging Cameras Efficient Trajectory: Launch 2016 Cruise 7.5 years (EGA, JGA) Entry 2023 Mission Features: Focused science objectives High-heritage instruments Simple cruise, no flyby science Simple surface operations ASRGs, launch vehicle are GFE 14

Flyby, Orbit, Land, Rove, and Return Samples NASA s 15