IMPLEMANTATION OF D FLIP FLOP BASED ON DIFFERENT XOR /XNOR GATE DESIGNS

Similar documents
Leakage Power Reduction in 5-Bit Full Adder using Keeper & Footer Transistor

IC Layout Design of 4-bit Universal Shift Register using Electric VLSI Design System

AND 5GHz ABSTRACTT. easily detected. the transition. for half duration. cycle highh voltage is send. this. data bit frame. the the. data.

A NOVEL 4-Bit ARITHMETIC LOGIC UNIT DESIGN FOR POWER AND AREA OPTIMIZATION

A Low Power Array Multiplier Design using Modified Gate Diffusion Input (GDI)

Comparative analysis of different designs of Manchester Encoder based on 45nm UMC CMOS Technology

Design and Performance Analysis of High Speed Low Power 1 bit Full Adder

ISSN:

Low Power &High Speed Domino XOR Cell

Design & Simulation of Half Adder Circuit Using AVL technique based on CMOS Technology

Investigation on Performance of high speed CMOS Full adder Circuits

International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 6, Issue 7, July ISSN

II. Previous Work. III. New 8T Adder Design

ISSN Vol.04, Issue.05, May-2016, Pages:

Design of Low Power Flip Flop Based on Modified GDI Primitive Cells and Its Implementation in Sequential Circuits

Design of an Energy Efficient, Low Power Dissipation Full Subtractor Using GDI Technique

Technology, Jabalpur, India 1 2

Low-Power Digital CMOS Design: A Survey

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY (IJCET)

A Low-Power 12 Transistor Full Adder Design using 3 Transistor XOR Gates

Domino CMOS Implementation of Power Optimized and High Performance CLA adder

Circuit level, 32 nm, 1-bit MOSSI-ULP adder: power, PDP and area efficient base cell for unsigned multiplier

Design and Implementation of Low Power Dynamic Thermometer Encoder For Flash ADC

A Comparative Analysis of Low Power and Area Efficient Digital Circuit Design

Implementation of Carry Select Adder using CMOS Full Adder

Implementation of Full Adder using Cmos Logic

PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OF LOW POWER FULL ADDER CELLS USING 45NM CMOS TECHNOLOGY

Low Power Adiabatic Logic Design

3. COMPARING STRUCTURE OF SINGLE GATE AND DOUBLE GATE MOSFET WITH DESIGN AND CURVE

A HIGH SPEED & LOW POWER 16T 1-BIT FULL ADDER CIRCUIT DESIGN BY USING MTCMOS TECHNIQUE IN 45nm TECHNOLOGY

Design of Low power and Area Efficient 8-bit ALU using GDI Full Adder and Multiplexer

Sophisticated design of low power high speed full adder by using SR-CPL and Transmission Gate logic

A SUBSTRATE BIASED FULL ADDER CIRCUIT

Low Power 32-bit Improved Carry Select Adder based on MTCMOS Technique

Comparison of High Speed & Low Power Techniques GDI & McCMOS in Full Adder Design

Pass Transistor and CMOS Logic Configuration based De- Multiplexers

Implementation of High Performance Carry Save Adder Using Domino Logic

Implementation of dual stack technique for reducing leakage and dynamic power

DESIGNING OF SRAM USING LECTOR TECHNIQUE TO REDUCE LEAKAGE POWER

LOW POWER NOVEL HYBRID ADDERS FOR DATAPATH CIRCUITS IN DSP PROCESSOR

ADIABATIC LOGIC FOR LOW POWER DIGITAL DESIGN

Low Power Realization of Subthreshold Digital Logic Circuits using Body Bias Technique

Design and Analyse Low Power Wallace Multiplier Using GDI Technique

Modelling Of Adders Using CMOS GDI For Vedic Multipliers

CHAPTER 6 GDI BASED LOW POWER FULL ADDER CELL FOR DSP DATA PATH BLOCKS

Design Analysis of 1-bit Comparator using 45nm Technology

CPE/EE 427, CPE 527 VLSI Design I: Homeworks 3 & 4

Design of High Performance Arithmetic and Logic Circuits in DSM Technology

4-BIT RCA FOR LOW POWER APPLICATIONS

EMT 251 Introduction to IC Design

Minimizing the Sub Threshold Leakage for High Performance CMOS Circuits Using Stacked Sleep Technique

The Design of SET-CMOS Hybrid Logic Style of 1-Bit Comparator

Implementation of Low Power High Speed Full Adder Using GDI Mux

POWER DELAY PRODUCT AND AREA REDUCTION OF FULL ADDERS USING SYSTEMATIC CELL DESIGN METHODOLOGY

Enhancement of Design Quality for an 8-bit ALU

A Low Power and Area Efficient Full Adder Design Using GDI Multiplexer

Power Optimization for Ripple Carry Adder with Reduced Transistor Count

A Low-Power High-speed Pipelined Accumulator Design Using CMOS Logic for DSP Applications

DESIGN OF PARALLEL MULTIPLIERS USING HIGH SPEED ADDER

Design and Analysis of Sram Cell for Reducing Leakage in Submicron Technologies Using Cadence Tool

P. Sree latha, M. Arun kumar

LOW POWER CMOS CELL STRUCTURES BASED ON ADIABATIC SWITCHING

A REVIEW PAPER ON HIGH PERFORMANCE 1- BIT FULL ADDERS DESIGN AT 90NM TECHNOLOGY

Gdi Technique Based Carry Look Ahead Adder Design

Analysis of Different CMOS Full Adder Circuits Based on Various Parameters for Low Voltage VLSI Design

Sub-threshold Leakage Current Reduction Using Variable Gate Oxide Thickness (VGOT) MOSFET

Design of low threshold Full Adder cell using CNTFET

Design and Implementation of Complex Multiplier Using Compressors

A Novel Approach for High Speed and Low Power 4-Bit Multiplier

A High Performance Asynchronous Counter using Area and Power Efficient GDI T-Flip Flop

International Journal of Advance Engineering and Research Development

Performance Comparison of CMOS and Finfet Based Circuits At 45nm Technology Using SPICE

A Novel Dual Stack Sleep Technique for Reactivation Noise suppression in MTCMOS circuits

Implementation and Performance Analysis of a Vedic Multiplier Using Tanner EDA Tool

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED RESEARCH IN ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY (IJARET)

Design of Low Power Low Voltage Circuit using CMOS Ternary Logic

DESIGN OF EXTENDED 4-BIT FULL ADDER CIRCUIT USING HYBRID-CMOS LOGIC

Design and Analysis of Low-Power 11- Transistor Full Adder

A Literature Survey on Low PDP Adder Circuits

Integration of Optimized GDI Logic based NOR Gate and Half Adder into PASTA for Low Power & Low Area Applications

Low power high speed hybrid CMOS Full Adder By using sub-micron technology

[Vivekanand*, 4.(12): December, 2015] ISSN: (I2OR), Publication Impact Factor: 3.785

POWER EFFICIENT CARRY PROPAGATE ADDER

2-BIT COMPARATOR WITH 8-TRANSISTOR 1-BIT FULL ADDER WITH CAPACITOR

Introduction. Digital Integrated Circuits A Design Perspective. Jan M. Rabaey Anantha Chandrakasan Borivoje Nikolic. July 30, 2002

Power-Area trade-off for Different CMOS Design Technologies

Low Power High Performance 10T Full Adder for Low Voltage CMOS Technology Using Dual Threshold Voltage

Performance Analysis of Novel Domino XNOR Gate in Sub 45nm CMOS Technology

12-nm Novel Topologies of LPHP: Low-Power High- Performance 2 4 and 4 16 Mixed-Logic Line Decoders

Comparative Study of Different Low Power Design Techniques for Reduction of Leakage Power in CMOS VLSI Circuits

Implementation of Efficient 5:3 & 7:3 Compressors for High Speed and Low-Power Operations

Design & Analysis of Low Power Full Adder

Comparative Analysis of Array Multiplier Using Different Logic Styles

Low Power 8-Bit ALU Design Using Full Adder and Multiplexer

Low-Power High-Speed Double Gate 1-bit Full Adder Cell

Reduced Area & Improved Delay Module Design of 16- Bit Hamming Codec using HSPICE 22nm Technology based on GDI Technique

MACGDI: Low Power MAC Based Filter Bank Using GDI Logic for Hearing Aid Applications

Design and Analysis of Energy Efficient MOS Digital Library Cell Based on Charge Recovery Logic

Minimization of 34T Full Subtractor Parameters Using MTCMOS Technique

CHAPTER 5 DESIGN AND ANALYSIS OF COMPLEMENTARY PASS- TRANSISTOR WITH ASYNCHRONOUS ADIABATIC LOGIC CIRCUITS

Transcription:

IMPLEMANTATION OF D FLIP FLOP BASED ON DIFFERENT XOR /XNOR GATE DESIGNS 1 MADHUR KULSHRESTHA, 2 VIPIN KUMAR GUPTA 1 M. Tech. Scholar, Department of Electronics & Communication Engineering, Suresh Gyan Vihar University, Jaipur 2 Assistant Professor, Department of Electronics & Communication Engineering, Suresh Gyan Vihar University, Jaipur ABSTRACT Rapid growth in electronics market in last three decades has increased pressure on the VLSI industry to continuously upgrade its technology, in terms of chip design systems, very high integration density and increasing operating frequencies beyond few GHz, along with their benefits some critical concerns has arisen i.e. increase in power consumption of the devices and another to reduce it as much as possible. Due to the drastically changing market, increasing demand and great popularity of portable electronic devices, designers are optimizing their system designs in order to get greater speeds, higher packing density, and good battery life with more reliability. Power consumption is the figure of merit in electronic goods. So power is the primary concern any designer to save it while system designing. The circuits, XOR XNOR are the basic building blocks in many electronic circuits such as combinational circuits (Full adder, multipliers, parity checkers, comparators, error detecting codes, phase detectors circuit in PLL, code converters) etc. Since the permance of the individual circuit i.e. XOR XNOR directly affects the complex logic circuits. Theree, very careful designing and analysis has to be done using XOR XNOR circuits. The XOR XNOR circuits should give less power consumption, less power dissipation, complete output voltage swing and optimized delay in propagation or in critical path. In addition to that, lesser number of transistors has to be used designing purpose of XOR XNOR circuits and simultaneous generation of two non skewed outputs. The amazing improvement in microelectronics industry have taken place in last 30 years and it is steadily moving and upgrading ward to achieve a prime position in the system design of modern electronics. It has penetrated its roots all over the world so largely in such a short period of time because of its continuous advancements in the permance of the device while being pocket friendly to each level of customer. The entire some efts of the designers have enabled them to make devices having the desired features like fewer delays, less power consumption and high packing density. The continuation of Moore s law has been proved due to increased clock speeds and small features size. The Moore s law states that the transistor density on integrated circuits doubles every 18 months. Different designs of XOR/XNOR gate has been designed using different components like Transmission Gates, NMOS switches, Pass Transistors & GDI (Gate Diffusion Input) cell that can be operated at higher frequencies. All designs have been designed using 32nm UMC CMOS technology and compared the supply voltage range from 0.9V to 1.5V. These designs are simulated in HSPICE tool the successful function. Best optimized design of XOR/XNOR gate is found out. It is being widely used in a high speed microprocessors like adders, comparators etc perming different arithmetic operations. Improved features of XOR/XNOR circuit increases the permance of full adder and other circuits. 1. INTRODUCTION Rapid growth in electronics market in last three decades has increased pressure on the VLSI industry to continuously upgrade its technology, in terms of chip design systems, very high integration density and increasing operating frequencies beyond few GHz, along with their benefits some critical concerns has arisen i.e. increase in power consumption of the devices and another to reduce it as much as possible. Due to the drastically changing market, increasing demand and great popularity of portable electronic devices, designers are optimizing their system designs in order to get greater speeds, higher packing density, and good battery life with more reliability. Power consumption is the figure of merit in electronic goods. So power is the primary concern any designer to save it while system designing. The circuits, XOR XNOR are the basic building blocks in many electronic circuits such as combinational circuits (Full adder, multipliers, parity checkers, comparators, error detecting codes, phase detectors circuit in PLL, code converters) etc. Since the permance of the individual circuit i.e. XOR XNOR directly affects the complex logic circuits. Theree, very careful designing and analysis has to be done using XOR XNOR circuits. The XOR XNOR circuits should give less power consumption, less power dissipation, complete output voltage swing and optimized delay in propagation or in critical path. In addition to that, lesser number of transistors has to be used designing purpose of XOR XNOR circuits and simultaneous generation of two nonskewed outputs. The amazing improvement in microelectronics industry have taken place in last 30 years and it is steadily moving and upgrading ward to achieve a prime position in the system design of modern electronics. It has penetrated its roots all over the world so largely in such a short period of time because of its continuous advancements in the permance of the device while being pocket friendly to each level of customer. The entiresome efts of the designers have enabled them to make devices having the desired features like fewer INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENCE, ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY- www.ijset.in 39

delays, less power consumption and high packing density. The continuation of Moore s law has been proved due to increased clock speeds and small features size. The Moore s law states that The transistor density on integrated circuits doubles every 18 months. CMOS Technology has been successful due to the fact that it has compact designs and the scaling factor is much smaller the CMOS transistor when compared to other technologies. In VLSI i.e. (Very Large Scale Integration) circuits CMOS technology is dominating because of its improved permance at power consumption. involves modelling of circuit, then synthesis of the circuit and verification will be required at the each and every level of abstraction. Manual design techniques are not that much efficient and it cannot keep pace with every level of design cycle of product and hence the manual design techniques are replaced with automated design techniques. Figure 2: MOSFET Gate length versus year Figure 1: CPU clock speed versus year The ITRS (International Technology Roadmap Semiconductor) was established by an expert group serving various purposes in the field of its main objective has been the specification of design parameter values of device so as to cope up with device technology in near future. Secondly, it highlights those challenges that coming generations might face in the field of device scaling. The ITRS s main projection in the front end process areas and MOSFET has been greater permance with very low power logic. Memory IC s and digital logic IC s serve as the major element in the production of semiconductor devices. The main feature of the devices is high speed at low power consumption. There may be different approaches to reach the goal better permance logic such as computer s microprocessors etc. TCAD (Technology Computer Aided Design) is a powerful tool. TCAD helps a designer to reduce design cost, improve productivity of device design and to obtain better due to the increasing demand of customers price reduction of high quality electronic goods; computation power has become cheap compared to earlier times. Another reason price reduction is Moore s law and the resulting improvements seen in the latest designs at relatively low expenditure. The development of IT infrastructure has drastically transmed lives of people and society. development in inmation technology has brought up by the (EDA) electronic design automation technology which is a computer aided design of VLSI circuits. EDA has many distinct features like unique collection of methodologies, tools algorithms which helps in assisting and automating designs, then in verifying and conducting various tests of electronic systems a successful design. A lower level detailed logical and physical implementation of any electronic circuit can be obtained from a high level description of an electronic circuit using EDA. process Computer simulation is cheap and time saving fabrication process. It can be used study and predict the various electrical characteristics of a designed circuit of a device. The various steps of fabrication process like modelling and simulation can be predicted and studied so as to study the electronic as well as physical characteristics of the device that is designed. Some of its physical characteristics are thickness of oxide and doping distribution. As TCAD is providing numerous advantages to its users gradually it has been accepted as main tool modelling as well as simulation of device designs. To obtainaccurate computer simulations and service modelling designer must give proper input and use calibrated physical models. 1.1 Motive of the Research The main aim of this research work is to study, examine and note all the similarities and differences of various designs of D flip flop based on XOR/XNOR circuits that have appropriate transistor characteristics by applying it to UMC 32nm CMOS technology supply voltage ranging from 0.9V to 1.5V and also to find out the finest optimized design of D flip flop circuits that is providing with all good characteristics like less power consumption, higher duty cycle and less time delay. The optimized design must be such that it can be easily implemented in combinational circuits such as adders, subtractors, comparators, parity checkers, multipliers etc. 2. PROPOSED WORK Today CMOS XOR/XNOR gates and D flip flop are being frequently used in high speed microprocessor like adder, multiplier etc to perm various arithmetic operations. These gates are crucial part of the circuit and affects overall permance of the device. PMOS circuit (pull up network) is a complex network theree the CMOS circuits consisting of PMOS network consumes high power and gives less speed. Today the main concern issues designing any CMOS circuit are power, delay and silicon area of the chip. Transmission gate is also used in INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENCE, ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY- www.ijset.in 40

designing of D flip flop based on XOR/XNOR circuit because transmission gate has high switching speed, requires less power and gives less delay. Delay can be easily predicted by Spice simulations. These simulations help in minimizing chip area, power consumption, time delay and maximizing reliability. All internal capacitances are ignored. The maximum number of loading circuits that can be connected to the output of D flip flop based on XOR/XNOR circuit is called fan out of a circuit which helps to drive the output signal. 0. When AB=11, M3, M4, M7, M8 gets on, at this stage M3 & M4 gives output 0 and M7 & M8 gives output 1. circuit works as a D flip flop based on Table 2 shows the transistors characteristics at 32nm design I. Table2: Transistors Characteristics Design I In this chapter I have explained and designed five CMOS structures of D flip flop based on XOR/XNOR circuits using different design styles and compared the main factors all the designs. All circuits are designed technology. using 32nm UMC CMOS Many papers are published in this area but I have designed D flip flop using different XOR/XNOR gate circuits. Table 1 mentions the initial parameters that are taken to make the pulse A & B. Table 1: Initial Parameters V dd = 0.9V, L = 32nm Input Delay (sec) Rise Time (sec) Fall Time (sec) A & B 0.025F 0.3P 0.3P 2.1 D Flip Flop Design I Figure 4: Output Design I 2.2 D Flip Flop Design II Figure 3: D flip flop design I When AB=00, M1, M2, M5, M6 gets ON. At this stage M1 & M2 gives XOR output 0 and M5 & M6 gives XNOR output Vdd as 1. Since B (Clock) is off so Q will be previous value of output. When AB=01, M2, M3, M5, M8 gets ON. At this stage M2 gives XOR output B as 1 and M8 gives XNOR output A as 0. Since B (Clock) is high so Q will be value of A. When AB=10, M1, M4, M6, M7 gets on, at this stage M1 gives XOR outpu A as 1 and M7 gives XNOR output B as Figure 5: D flip flop design II INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENCE, ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY- www.ijset.in 41

When AB=00, M1, M3, M5 gets ON. At this stage I1 produces output B and I2 produces outpu A. Output of I2 switches M9 & M10 on and output of M10 switches M7 on making XOR output 0 and XNOR output Vdd as 1. Since B (Clock) is off so Q will be previous value of output. When AB= 01, M1, M4, M6 gets ON. At this stage I1 & I2 produces output B and I3 produces output A making XNOR output 0. Output of I3 switches M8making XOR output 1. Since B (Clock) is high so Q will be value of A. When AB=10, M2, M3, M5 gets on, at this stage I1 & I3 produces outpu 0 making XNOR output 0. I2 produces output A making XOR output 1. When AB=11, M2, M4, M6 gets ON. At this stage I1& I2 produces output 0 making XOR output 0 and I3 produces output A. Output of I2 switches M9 & M10 on and output of M10 switches M7 on making XNOR output Vdd as 1. 2.3 D Flip Flop Design III circuit works as a D flip flop based on Figure 7: D flip flop design III Table 3 shows the transistors characteristics at 32nm design II. Table 3: Transistors Characteristics Design II When AB=00, M1, M3, M9 gets ON. At this stage M3 produces output B (0) as an XOR output& M1 produces output 1 and provides it to M9 making XNOR outpu 1. Since B (Clock) is off so Q will be previous value of output. When AB=01, M2, M3, M9 gets ON. At this stage M3 produces outpu B (1) as XOR output &M2 produces output 0 and provides it to M9 making XNOR outpu 0. Since B (Clock) is high so Q will be the value of A. When AB= =10, M1, M4, M10 gets on, at this stage M1 produces output 1 whichh flows through M4 making XOR outpu 1. XOR output switches M8 on and produces output 0 & M10 also produces output 0 as XNOR output. When AB=11, M2, M4, M10 gets ON. At this stage M2 produces output 0 which flows through M4 and makes XOR output 0. XOR output switches M5 on and produces output 1 & M10 also produces outputt 1 making XNOR output 1. circuit works as a D flip flop based on Table 4 shows the transistors characteristics at 32nm design III. Table 4: Transistors Characteristics Design IIII Figure 6: Outpu Design II INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENCE, ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY- www.ijset.in 42

Figure 8 shows the output wavem design III Table5: Transistors Characteristics Design IV Figure 10 showss the output wavem design IV Figure 8: Outpu Design III 2.4 D Flip Flop Design IV Figure 9: D flip flop design IV When AB=00, M1, M2, M5 gets ON. At this stage M1 produces outputt 1 which transfers M5 & M10 in ON condition and produces output B(0) as XOR output. XOR output is passed through inverter making XNOR outpu 1. Since B (Clock) is off so Q will be previous value of output. When AB=01, M1, M7, M5 gets ON. At this stage M1 produces outputt 1 which transfers M5 & M10 in ON condition and produces output B(1) as XOR output. XOR output is passed through inverter making XNOR outpu 0. Since B (Clock) is high so Q will be the value of A. When AB= 10, M2, M6, M9 gets on, at this stage M6 produces output 0 which transfers M4 in ON condition. M2 produces output 1 which flows through M4 & M9 making XOR output 1. XOR outputt is passed through inverter making XNOR output 0. When AB=11, M6, M7, M9 gets on, at this stage M6 produces output 0 whichh transfers M4 in ON condition. M7 produces output 0 which flows through M4 & M9 making XOR output 0. XOR output is passed through inverter making XNOR output 1. Figure 10: Output Design IV 2.5 D Flip Flop Design V circuit works as a D flip flop based on Table 5 shows the transistors characteristics at 32nm design IV. Figure 11: D flip flop design V INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENCE, ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY- www.ijset.in 43

When AB=00, M1, M3, M5 gets ON. At this stage M1 gives output B which flows upto XOR node making XOR output 0. M3gives output 1 & XOR output switches M8 on which makes XNOR output 1. Since B (Clock) is off so Q will be previous value of output. When AB=01, M1, M3, M6 gets ON. At this stage M1 gives XOR output B as 1.M3 gives output 1 but due to M6 XNOR output becomes 0. Since B (Clock) is high so Q will be the value of A. When AB=10, M2, M4, M5 gets on, at this stage M5 gives XOR output A as 1. M4 gives output B(0) as XNOR output. When AB=11, M2, M4, M6 gets on, at this stage M2 gives output 0 as XOR output which switches M8 on and M6 also gives output 1 as XNOR output. 3. RESULTS & SIMULATION All designs are simulated using 32nm UMC CMOS technology different values of Vdd. Comparison table each design is mentioned below: Table 7: Comparison table design I different Vdd circuit works as a D flip flop based on Table6 shows the transistors characteristics at 32nm design V. Table 8: Comparison table design II different Vdd Table 6: Transistors Characteristics Design V Table 9: Comparison table design III different Vdd Table 10: Comparison table design IV different Vdd Figure 12 shows the output wavem design V Table 11: Comparison table design V different Vdd Figure 12: Output Design V INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENCE, ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY- www.ijset.in 44

These simulation results show that as we increase the power supply (Vdd), propagation time delay and power delay product increases. Through these tables I have shown the different parameters of each D flip flop design based on XOR/XNOR circuit. 4. CONCLUSIONS & FUTURE SCOPE In this thesis, I have designed different circuits of D flip flop based on XOR/XNOR gate using CMOS inverters, NMOS digital switches, pass transistors and GDI cell. Each circuit structure has been designed using 32nm UMC CMOS technology. All the designs have been simulated in HSPICE and the results are checked the voltage range from 0.9V to 1.5V and 25 degree centigrade. Design I is considered to be the best optimized design of D flip flop based on XOR/XNOR gate with average power = 0.38µW and power delay product (PDP) = 0.078fJ at Vdd = 0.9V. I have studied the comparison between different designs of D flip flop based on XOR/XNOR gate circuits in detail. Thus high speed microprocessors this best optimized design can be used to perm various arithmetic operations. In future D flip flop based on XOR/XNOR circuits can be designed more efficiently. As technology is getting advanced, power consumption, delay time, chip area are the main concern issues which we have to improve, theree these circuits can be designed to solve these issues more efficiently to reduce the total cost of the system by optimizing transistors sizes. REFERENCES 5. Frank Schwierz, Hei Wong, Juin J. Liou, Nanometer CMOS, Pan Stand Publishing, 2010. 6. Behzad Razavi, Design of Analog CMOS Integrated Circuits, 2002. 7. Wayne Wolf, Modern VLSI Design, Pearson Education 2 nd Edition, 2007. 8. HSPICE User's Manual Meta Software, 1996. 9. Hamed Sadeghi, Hamed Mohammadi Jirandeh, Ali Zakeri, Improvement in Sub circuit of Full Adder Cell (XOR and XNOR) by GDI and Fin FET Structure, International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 5, Issue 5, May, 2014. 10. Nabihah Ahmad, Rezaul Hasan, A New Design of XOR XNOR gates low power application, International Conference on Electronic Devices, Systems & Applications, 2011. BIOGRAPHY Madhur Kulshrestha, is a final year student of M. Tech(Dual Degree) EC+VLSI from Gyan Vihar School of Engineering and Technology Jaipur, Rajasthan, India. 1. J.M. Rabaey, A. Chandrakasan, B. Nikolic, Digital integrated circuits: a design perspective, Prentice Hall, 2002. 2. Sung Mo Kang, Yusuf Leblebici, CMOS Digital Integrated Circuits: Analysis and Design, 2003. 3. Neil H.E. Weste, David F. Harris, CmosVlsi Design: A Circuits and Systems Perspective, 2005. 4. K. Roy and S. Prasad, Low Power CMOS VLSI Circuit Design. Vipin Kumar Gupta received the B.E. Degree in Electronics and Communication from Sri Balaji College of Engineering and Technology Jaipur in 2008 and M.Tech in VLSI Design from MNIT Jaipur in 2011.Currently Assistant Professor at Suresh Gyan Vihar University in EC Deparment. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENCE, ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY- www.ijset.in 45