Stakeholder Expectations Definition Process

Similar documents
Exploration Partnership Strategy. Marguerite Broadwell Exploration Systems Mission Directorate

NASA s Exploration Plans and The Lunar Architecture

The Global Exploration Roadmap International Space Exploration Coordination Group (ISECG)

A RENEWED SPIRIT OF DISCOVERY

Exploration Systems Research & Technology

Constellation Systems Division

ESA Strategic Framework for Human Exploration

estec PROSPECT Project Objectives & Requirements Document

NASA Mission Directorates

A Call for Boldness. President Kennedy September 1962

A RENEWED SPIRIT OF DISCOVERY

A SPACE STATUS REPORT. John M. Logsdon Space Policy Institute Elliott School of International Affairs George Washington University

NASA Keynote to International Lunar Conference Mark S. Borkowski Program Executive Robotic Lunar Exploration Program

Mid Term Exam SES 405 Exploration Systems Engineering 3 March Your Name

2009 Space Exploration Program Assessment

The Hybrid Space Program: A Commercial Strategy for NASA s Constellation Program

NASA Space Exploration 1 st Year Report

Future Directions: Strategy for Human and Robotic Exploration. Gary L. Martin Space Architect

Addressing International Lunar Surface Operations Click to edit Master title style

Secretary-General of the European Commission, signed by Mr Jordi AYET PUIGARNAU, Director

QUEST Vision for Exploration of Space

Credits. National Aeronautics and Space Administration. United Space Alliance, LLC. John Frassanito and Associates Strategic Visualization

Testimony to the President s Commission on Implementation of the United States Space Exploration Policy

The NASA-ESA. Comparative Architecture Assessment

Exploration Systems Mission Directorate: New Opportunities in the President s FY2011 Budget

Global Exploration Strategy (GES): A Framework for Coordination, Progress, and Future Opportunities

Global Exploration Strategy. Jeff Volosin Strategy Development Lead NASA Exploration Systems Mission Directorate

ESA Human Spaceflight Capability Development and Future Perspectives International Lunar Conference September Toronto, Canada

Panel Session IV - Future Space Exploration

ISHM Testbeds and Prototypes (ITP) Project

Design for Affordability in Complex Systems and Programs Using Tradespace-based Affordability Analysis

The Future of the US Space Program and Educating the Next Generation Workforce. IEEE Rock River Valley Section

Human Spaceflight: The Ultimate Team Activity

HEOMD Update NRC Aeronautics and Space Engineering Board Oct. 16, 2014

NASA Human Spaceflight Architecture Team Cis-Lunar Analysis. M. Lupisella 1, M. R. Bobskill 2

Typical Project Life Cycle

Introduction To Cognitive Robots

Earth is the cradle of the mind, but one cannot live in the cradle forever

Perspectives on human and robotic spaceflight. Steve Squyres Chairman, NASA Advisory Council Cornell University

Where are the Agencies Human Space Flight (HFR) Programs Heading? USA (NASA) System Description Goal Remarks * Space Launch System (SLS) Program

Lunar Exploration Science Campaign: A commercial-leveraged lunar mission program

Future technologies for planetary exploration within the European Exploration Envelope Programme at the European Space Agency

Science Enabled by the Return to the Moon (and the Ares 5 proposal)

Physical Science Summer Reading Assignment

The Lunar Exploration Campaign

Space Architecture MARYLAND U N I V E R S I T Y O F. Space Architecture. ENAE 483/788D - Principles of Space Systems Design

U.S. Exploration EVA: Architecture and ConOps Overview. NASA-JSC EVA Office/J. Buffington

Human Exploration Systems and Mobility Capability Roadmap. Chris Culbert, NASA Chair Jeff Taylor, External Chair

CYLICAL VISITS TO MARS VIA ASTRONAUT HOTELS

Dream Chaser for European Utilization (DC 4 EU):

SYMPOSIUM ON HUMAN SPACE ENDEAVOURS IAC-11.B3.1.8 THE GLOBAL EXPLORATION ROADMAP

IAC-13-A THE ISECG GLOBAL EXPLORATION ROADMAP: STRENGTHENING EXPLORATION THROUGH INCREASED HUMAN ROBOTIC PARTNERSHIP

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

Exploration Systems. Program Overview. July 15, 2004 Associate Administrator, Office of Exploration Systems Rear Admiral Craig E. Steidle (Ret.

ESA UNCLASSIFIED - Releasable to the Public. ESA Workshop: Research Opportunities on the Deep Space Gateway

Focus Session on Commercial Crew

High Level Forum, November Masazumi Miyake Director of International Relations Dept. JAXA

John P. Holdren, Director, Office of Science and Technology Policy

Outpost Optimizing Science & Exploration Working Group (OSEWG) - Lunar Surface Science Scenarios

Plans for Human Exploration Beyond Low Earth Orbit. Doug Cooke, AA ESMD March 4, 2011

Statement of Michael D. Griffin Administrator National Aeronautics and Space Administration before the Committee on Science House of Representatives

The Global Exploration Roadmap

When Failure Means Success: Accepting Risk in Aerospace Projects NASA Project Management Challenge 2009

The Global Exploration Roadmap

The Cooperation of Alcatel Alenia Space Italia and Politecnico di Torino on Space Exploration Scenarios

NEO Science and Human Space Activity. Mark V. Sykes Director, Planetary Science Institute Chair, NASA Small Bodies Assessment Group

GLEX x12693 ASTEROID NEXT: A VIEW TO THE ROLE OF ASTEROID MISSIONS IN THE 2 ND ITERATION OF THE ISECG GLOBAL EXPLORATION ROADMAP

Kennedy Space Center. Connecting Space Grant with Spaceport and Range Technology and Science Thrust Areas

Status and Outlook for the European Exploration Envelope Programme

The Future of Space Exploration in the USA. Jakob Silberberg

Office of Chief Technologist - Space Technology Program Dr. Prasun Desai Office of the Chief Technologist May 1, 2012

Preliminary Report Regarding NASA s Space Launch System and Multi-Purpose Crew Vehicle

and : Principles of Autonomy and Decision Making. Prof Brian Williams, Prof Emilio Frazzoli and Sertac Karaman September, 8 th, 2010

Understand that technology has different levels of maturity and that lower maturity levels come with higher risks.

Chapter 2 Planning Space Campaigns and Missions

Prof. Daniel Roos ESD 10

ESA PREPARATION FOR HUMAN LUNAR EXPLORATION. Scott Hovland European Space Agency, HME-HFH, ESTEC,

Analysis of European Architectures for Space Exploration

On January 14, 2004, the President announced a new space exploration vision for NASA

ASTRA ERA and Future Robotics (for Exploration)

System Architecture Module Exploration Systems Engineering, version 1.0

Value-Based System of System Development

GAO. NASA Issues Surrounding the Transition from the Space Shuttle to the Next Generation of Human Space Flight Systems

Update on R&M Engineering Activities: Rebuilding Military Readiness

2009 ESMD Space Grant Faculty Project

WHAT WILL AMERICA DO IN SPACE NOW?

The NASA-ESA Comparative Architecture Assessment (CAA)

Fault Management Architectures and the Challenges of Providing Software Assurance

NASA s Human Space Exploration Capability Driven Framework

Written Statement of. Dr. Sandra Magnus Executive Director American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Reston, Virginia

NASA All-Hands Address on Support of the FY2011 Budget Proposal NASA Johnson Space Center Houston, TX April 28, 2010

NASA s Space Launch System: Powering the Journey to Mars. FISO Telecon Aug 3, 2016

IAC-11-D3.1.2 ISECG MISSION SCENARIOS AND THEIR ROLE IN INFORMING NEXT STEPS FOR HUMAN EXPLORATION BEYOND LOW EARTH ORBIT

Asteroid Redirect Mission and Human Exploration. William H. Gerstenmaier NASA Associate Administrator for Human Exploration and Operations

ASSEMBLY AND SERVICING OF SPACE TELESCOPES

MOON Outcome of the Symposium on a New Era of Human and Robotic Exploration

S P A C E TOURISM II Lecture Series given by Dr.-Ing. Robert Alexander Goehlich 2003 by Robert A. Goehlich ようこそ

Evolvable Mars Campaign & SKGs

Commission for Moon, Mars and Beyond

FY 2004 Budget Request. February 3, 2003

Transcription:

Stakeholder Expectations Definition Process Stakeholder Expectations Definition Requirement 5 (Section 3.2..) The Center Directors or designees shall establish and maintain a process, to include activities, requirements, guidelines, and documentation, for the definition of stakeholder expectations for the applicable WBS model. Part Andrew I Part I (3 Mar 09) I -

Suddenly There Is A Heated Argument! Why? Far Side cartoon of two cavemen arguing removed due to copyright restrictions. Part Andrew I Part I (3 Mar 09) I - 2

Stakeholder Expectation Definition Purpose and Importance The Stakeholder Expectation Definition Process is used to: Identify who Stakeholders are (for all phases of the project) Identify how the product is intended to be used by the stakeholders Elicit and define stakeholder expectations (including use cases, scenarios, operational concepts) in ways we can measure (validate) the appropriateness of our system when completed. Result is the foundation from which the system is designed and the product realized. Part Andrew I Part I (3 Mar 09) I - 3

Who is a Stakeholder? A group or an individual who is affected by or is in some way accountable for the outcome of an undertaking Stakeholders can be classified as: Customers An organization or individual that has requested a product and will receive the product to be delivered. Examples: An end user of the product The acquiring agent for the end user The requestor of the work product from a technical effort Other interested parties who provide broad overarching constraints within which the customers needs must be achieved, or who have influence on success of the system. Examples: Those affected by the resulting product Those affected by the manner in which the product is realized or used Those who have a responsibility for providing life-cycle support services (e.g. design, manufacturing, operations, maintenance) Part Andrew I Part I (3 Mar 09) I - 4

Example Technical Stakeholders Relative to Org External Internal Customer Stakeholder Subcontractors/vendors Local, State, National Public Org Management PM Technical Team members Functional Organizations (e.g., test) Typical Expectations Expected level of product quality, delivered on time, affordable, life cycle support & services Well defined requirements Products must not contaminate the environment Internal Commitments met (cost, schedule), good status provided, compliance with org policies, directives and procedures Expected technical work products delivered on time and can be used for decision making clear tasks, job security, rewards, teamwork Test support products available, clear test requirements, recognition for project help Part Andrew I Part I (3 Mar 09) I - 5

Stakeholders are Everywhere... Capabilities Functions Priorities Reliability System Performance Technical Effectiveness Maintainability Supportability Producibility Operations Maintenance Logistics System Availability Process Efficiency System Effectiveness Affordable Operational Effectiveness Life Cycle Cost/Total Ownership Cost Part Andrew I Part I (3 Mar 09) I - 6

The Vision for Space Exploration: Foundations for Exploration Complete the International Space Station Safely fly the Space Shuttle until 200 Develop & fly the Crew Exploration Vehicle no later than 204 Return to the Moon no later than 2020 Extend human presence across the solar system & beyond Implement a sustained & affordable human & robotic program Promote international & commercial participation in Exploration NASA Authorization Act of 2005 The Administrator shall establish a program to develop a sustained human presence on the Moon, including a robust precursor program to promote exploration, science, commerce and U.S. preeminence in space, and as a stepping stone to future exploration of Mars and other destinations. Part Andrew I Part I (3 Mar 09) I - 7

Stakeholder Expectations Definition Guidance Concept of Operations One of the major outputs for capturing stakeholder expectations is the Concept of Operations or ConOps The ConOps is an important component in capturing expectations, forming requirements and developing the architecture of a project Should be addressed early in the project Thinking through the ConOps and use cases often reveals requirements and design functions that might be otherwise overlooked Part Andrew I Part I (3 Mar 09) I - 8

Constellation ConOps for Mission to ISS SM Expended CEV Docked for ~ 6 Months Landing Continue Missions Earth ISS DRM Image by MIT OpenCourseWare. DRM = Design Reference Mission Source: CxP 70007 Cx Design Reference Missions Part Andrew I Part I (3 Mar 09) I - 9

Design Reference Missions Mission Key Driving Requirements Image by MIT OpenCourseWare. Part Andrew I Part I (3 Mar 09) I - 0

Concept of Operations Developed at Lower Decomposition Levels Orion Low Impact Docking System (LIDS) Image by MIT OpenCourseWare. Part Andrew I Part I (3 Mar 09) I -

Example of Constellation Stakeholder Expectation MOEs Ability to transport six crew members to/from the ISS. Ability to deliver four crew members to the lunar surface and return them to Earth. Ability to deliver six crew members to the surface of Mars and return them to Earth. Part Andrew I Part I (3 Mar 09) I - 2

Shakeholder Expectations Definition Discussion How do we identify what the stakeholders really want? How do we prevent stakeholders from designing the system? Part Andrew I Part I (3 Mar 09) I - 3

Stakeholder Expectations Definition - Best Practice Process Flow Diagram Input Activities Output Part Andrew I Part I (3 Mar 09) I - 4

Interrelationships Among the System Design Processes SP-2007-605, Figure 4.0- Part Andrew I Part I (3 Mar 09) I - 5

What are the Benefits of the Stakeholder Expectations Process? Build a system that meets customers expectations Operators requirements Support from Congress and public Build a system that can be tested, operated and maintained Ensure Stakeholder commitments are obtained and realized. Part Andrew I Part I (3 Mar 09) I - 6

Stakeholder Expectations Definition - Summary Stakeholders can be classified as customers or other interested parties who affect the product Stakeholder Expectations can be captured in a Concept of Operations or ConOps and with Measures of Effectiveness (MOEs) Stakeholders should be involved throughout the product lifecycle Stakeholder expectations can be found in multiple layers of the product decomposition Part Andrew I Part I (3 Mar 09) I - 7

MIT OpenCourseWare http://ocw.mit.edu 6.842 Fundamentals of Systems Engineering Fall 2009 For information about citing these materials or our Terms of Use, visit: http://ocw.mit.edu/terms.