Engaging UK Climate Service Providers a series of workshops in November 2014

Similar documents
Engaging Stakeholders

Please send your responses by to: This consultation closes on Friday, 8 April 2016.

MILAN DECLARATION Joining Forces for Investment in the Future of Europe

Integrated Transformational and Open City Governance Rome May

RESEARCH AND INNOVATION STRATEGY. ANZPAA National Institute of Forensic Science

Conclusions on the future of information and communication technologies research, innovation and infrastructures

Technology Platforms: champions to leverage knowledge for growth

Written response to the public consultation on the European Commission Green Paper: From

The main recommendations for the Common Strategic Framework (CSF) reflect the position paper of the Austrian Council

Concept of Periodic Synthesis Report

A New Platform for escience and data research into the European Ecosystem.

Conclusions concerning various issues related to the development of the European Research Area

Supportive publishing practices in DRR: Leaving no scientist behind

COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 9 December 2008 (16.12) (OR. fr) 16767/08 RECH 410 COMPET 550

10246/10 EV/ek 1 DG C II

Research Infrastructures and Innovation

Doing, supporting and using public health research. The Public Health England strategy for research, development and innovation

Scoping Paper for. Horizon 2020 work programme Societal Challenge 4: Smart, Green and Integrated Transport

No. prev. doc.: 9108/10 RECH 148 SOC 296 Subject: Social Dimension of the European Research Area - Adoption of Council conclusions

Joint Programming Initiative Healthy and Productive Seas and Oceans

SCAR response to the 2 nd Foresight Expert Group Report

Consultation on Long Term sustainability of Research Infrastructures

Initial draft of the technology framework. Contents. Informal document by the Chair

I. Introduction. Cover note. A. Mandate. B. Scope of the note. Technology Executive Committee. Fifteenth meeting. Bonn, Germany, September 2017

Our Corporate Strategy Digital

Societal engagement in Horizon 2020

Water, Energy and Environment in the scope of the Circular Economy

Digital Innovation Hubs & Smart Specialisation

Roadmap for European Universities in Energy December 2016

COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT STRATEGY FOR EUROPEAN TECHNOLOGY PLATFORMS: ETP 2020

Green Paper - From Challenges to Opportunities: Towards a Common Strategic Framework. for EU Research and Innovation Funding

Media Literacy Policy

Horizon 2020 Towards a Common Strategic Framework for EU Research and Innovation Funding

EuropeAid. Sustainable and Cleaner Production in the Manufacturing Industries of Pakistan (SCI-Pak)

Horizon 2020 and CAP towards 2020

CIVIC EPISTEMOLOGIES Civic Epistemologies: Development of a Roadmap for Citizen Researchers in the age of Digital Culture Workshop on the Roadmap

Whole of Society Conflict Prevention and Peacebuilding

An Innovative Public Private Approach for a Technology Facilitation Mechanism (TFM)

SEAS-ERA STRATEGIC FORUM

Project presentation Lampros Stegioulas. NEM General Assembly, Brussels 1 April 2014

A Science & Innovation Audit for the West Midlands

Welcome to the future of energy

LTS of Ris - Action plan - prospects for the future programming period

ANU COLLEGE OF MEDICINE, BIOLOGY & ENVIRONMENT

VSNU December Broadening EU s horizons. Position paper FP9

Our position. ICDPPC declaration on ethics and data protection in artificial intelligence

Programme. Social Economy. in Västra Götaland Adopted on 19 June 2012 by the regional board, Region Västra Götaland

United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change UNFCCC EXPERT GROUP ON TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER FIVE YEARS OF WORK

UN GA TECHNOLOGY DIALOGUES, APRIL JUNE

International Collaborative Initiative. Enhancing Foresight and Scenario Analysis for Global Food Systems

COST FP9 Position Paper

First MyOcean User Workshop 7-8 April 2011, Stockholm Main outcomes

European Circular Economy Stakeholder Conference Brussels, February 2018 Civil Society Perspectives

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES

Robotics: from FP7 to Horizon Libor Král, Head of Unit Unit A2 - Robotics DG Communication Networks, Content and Technology European Commission

How to write a Successful Proposal

Report on the Results of. Questionnaire 1

MEDLAB Mediterranean Living Lab for Territorial Innovation. Panagiotis Georgopoulos Region of Central Macedonia

EIP Water European Innovation Partnership on Water

Knowledge Exchange Strategy ( )

University of Dundee. Design in Action Knowledge Exchange Process Model Woods, Melanie; Marra, M.; Coulson, S. DOI: 10.

LSCB Pan-Lancashire LSCB Online Safeguarding Strategy

Towards a Consumer-Driven Energy System

REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL. on the evaluation of Europeana and the way forward. {SWD(2018) 398 final}

1 st EU Dialogue on Ecodesign and New Business Models for a Circular Economy. Introduction to the COBALT project

UK High-Field NMR Funding and the UKRI Infrastructure Roadmap

The UNISDR Global Science & Technology Advisory Group for the implementation of the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction UNISDR

The New Delhi Communiqué

Committee on Development and Intellectual Property (CDIP)

CREDITING-RELATED READINESS ACTIVITIES UNDER THE PMR: UPDATE AND SUGGESTED NEXT STEPS

STRATEGY IMPLEMENTATION PLAN

TENTATIVE REFLECTIONS ON A FRAMEWORK FOR STI POLICY ROADMAPS FOR THE SDGS

Scoping Paper for. Horizon 2020 work programme Leadership in Enabling and Industrial Technologies Space

THE BLUEMED INITIATIVE AND ITS STRATEGIC RESEARCH AGENDA

FP9 s ambitious aims for societal impact call for a step change in interdisciplinarity and citizen engagement.

Open Science for the 21 st century. A declaration of ALL European Academies

Social Innovation and new pathways to social changefirst insights from the global mapping

Information & Communication Technology Strategy

"How to ensure a secure supply of raw materials in the global economy"

Technology and Innovation in the NHS Scottish Health Innovations Ltd

Climate Change Innovation and Technology Framework 2017

ICT : Internet of Things and Platforms for Connected Smart Objects

RECOMMENDATIONS. COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION (EU) 2018/790 of 25 April 2018 on access to and preservation of scientific information

Australian Museum Research Institute Science Strategy

Post : RIS 3 and evaluation

Expectations around Impact in Horizon 2020

16502/14 GT/nj 1 DG G 3 C

EU-PolarNet connecting science with society

April 2015 newsletter. Efficient Energy Planning #3

PRESENTATION OUTLINE

THEFUTURERAILWAY THE INDUSTRY S RAIL TECHNICAL STRATEGY 2012 INNOVATION

CERN-PH-ADO-MN For Internal Discussion. ATTRACT Initiative. Markus Nordberg Marzio Nessi

THE ROLE OF TRANSPORT TECHNOLOGY PLATFORMS IN FOSTERING EXPLOITATION. Josef Mikulík Transport Research Centre - CDV

Meeting Report (Prepared by Angel Aparicio, Transport Advisory Group Rapporteur) 21 June Introduction... 1

From FP7 towards Horizon 2020 Workshop on " Research performance measurement and the impact of innovation in Europe" IPERF, Luxembourg, 31/10/2013

Copyright: Conference website: Date deposited:

Copernicus Evolution: Fostering Growth in the EO Downstream Services Sector

Hamburg, 25 March nd International Science 2.0 Conference Keynote. (does not represent an official point of view of the EC)

PACIFIC SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY ADVISORY GROUP TO UNISDR (PSTAG)

TOURISM INSIGHT FRAMEWORK GENERATING KNOWLEDGE TO SUPPORT SUSTAINABLE TOURISM. IMAGE CREDIT: Miles Holden

Transcription:

Engaging UK Climate Service Providers a series of workshops in November 2014 Belfast, London, Edinburgh and Cardiff Four workshops were held during November 2014 to engage organisations (providers, purveyors and users) within the UK that have a role or interest in providing climate services to users to support decision making and other activities. In addition to providing an opportunity to better understand the climate service community across the UK, and current developments and opportunities within the UK and Europe, the workshops aimed to: Identify the nature of the demand and supply of climate services and associated barriers and enablers; Contribute to identifying research needs, knowledge gaps and innovations that would support organisations in providing climate related services, and consider how these can be linked to UK and European Horizon 2020 initiatives; and Explore links, partnership opportunities and challenges, including the role that a network or community of providers of climate services could play at the national, UK and European levels. Scope of Climate Services For the purpose of these workshops, climate services were defined as: The transformation of climate related data together with other relevant information and data into customised products such as projections, forecasts, information, trends, economic analyses, assessments (including technology assessments), counselling on best practices, development and evaluation of solutions, and other services in relation to climate or responding to climate change that are of use to society. The uses to society considered are in the context of climate change impacts, risk and vulnerability assessments, as well as adaptation, mitigation, and disaster risk management. It was noted that many users are not familiar with the use of the term climate services (some even believe it is similar to ecosystem good and services) and that there are data, information and knowledge being provided and used that are not called climate services. Types and scope of participants The workshops attracted representatives from academic institutions, consultancies, industry, policy makers (government departments at different levels), government agencies and knowledge exchange organisations. A total of 92 participants were engaged (Belfast 18; London 33; Edinburgh 22; and Cardiff 19). They represented a wide spectrum of providers, purveyors and users of climate services.

It was noted that although participants were all interested and saw themselves playing a role in climate services, they were not necessarily aware of the roles of other participants nor did they see themselves as being engaged as a community. There were differences in this level of awareness and engagement across the four workshops that for the most part reflected the relative maturity of the climate service markets represented at the different workshops and the extent of previous collaborations among participants. These differences were also reflected in the range of expressed needs for collaborative links and in the nature and roles of the required climate service community. Discussions with participants revealed that many played different roles within the climate service space and this was seen as particularly important where climate services are user- driven and science informed. There is often not a clear boundary between users and providers/purveyors. Individuals and the organisations they represented saw themselves as both users of climate services, but also providers/purveyors in that they provide data and information and add value to that of others before making products available to users. As such, they recognised that their roles often spanned and needed to span a range of roles (e.g., knowledge and data production, synthesis, translation, mobilisation, and the provision of advice and guidance). The Climate Service Market Looking across the organisations and sectors represented at the workshops, there is the potential for a wider range of private and public organisations to use climate services. Overall, the current market could be described as immature but evolving slowly due to a lack of demand and limited awareness of the services and providers available. It was also noted that for many organisations, responding to climate change is not perceived as an immediate need with economic and other drivers taking priority. This could reduce the demand for climate services and hinder the development of the market. It was noted that the state of the market is not yet driving/informing supply and more action is needed to both improve awareness and understanding of their potential along with stimulating uptake and use of climate services. Further contributing to the status of the market is the limited capacity within the user community in terms of ability to access and use climate services. Additionally, for the most part there is not a clear understanding of who are the providers, purveyors and users (customer base) of climate services. The maturity of the market in the water and transport sectors was noted as being relatively high, whilst the housing and health sectors were identified as particularly low. It was also noted that the potential for growth of climate services may be higher in those sectors (e.g., agriculture, forestry and disaster risk management) that traditionally use weather services, in which long- term decision- making is the norm and where major, long- term investments are being made (e.g., infrastructure).

The growth in the demand for climate services can be attributed to the recent requirements of EU, UK and other regulations and policies and an increasing awareness by organisations of the potential implications of climate change, including extreme weather events. At present, climate services (supply and demand) are primarily comprised of data and information on climate change science (e.g., model and scenario projections and observations) and products derived from this science. There appears to be a lack of availability (or demand for) services that integrate this data and information with those from other relevant areas (e.g., hydrology and land- use change). In addition, much of what is available is generic for the UK, with a lack of local data and information specific to a particular region or sector. Participants expressed the need for greater engagement of the customer base in the co- design, co- development and co- evaluation of climate services, greater consideration of the type and/or level of information needed to inform decisions and a better understanding of the varied capacities of users to work with climate services. Research needs, knowledge gaps and innovations Drawing across the discussions at the four workshops, the following overarching elements can be highlighted: Demonstration to stimulate action and learning and to highlight the added value of climate services Includes peer- to- peer work, case studies and pilot studies looking at both the specific outcomes and the processes used to achieve impact. Demonstrate the value of climate services (e.g. through the use of demonstration projects and case studies) to leverage wider engagement and demand. Start with those organisations already involved and which have case studies and examples to share. Overcoming the barriers of lack of appropriate and relevant knowledge and information would promote the use of climate services within decision making. Demonstrating the value of climate services in the context of existing decision- making frameworks. Integration of data and information to support decision making Integration of climate data, information and knowledge with other data and information that are specific to decision making in priority sectors Identifying the data and information needs to support assessment and decision making related to life- cycle management, hot spots and interdependencies within and across sectors/systems Increase the understanding and application of uncertainty relevance, clarity and integration of uncertainties that impact on decisions, including those associated with climate, socio- economic, hydrological and ecosystem impacts, and adaptation. Understanding and improving links within the climate service landscape Identifying what data, information and knowledge is available (including baseline data) and where (who are the providers/purveyors), and ensuring that the appropriate infrastructure is in place to provide access by the intended users. Promoting and demonstrating to users the added value of climate services to their decision- making and the resulting decisions. Identifying what can be done to facilitate better working across sectors to support the development of climate services, including within private/public partnerships and within regions.

Improving engagement of early adopter users with the provider/purveyor community to facilitate co- design, co- development and co- evaluation. Understanding users and their decisions Designing, developing and evaluating climate services by starting with an understanding of the targeted decisions and how the risk- based approach works in practice, including understanding where decisions are/can be influenced by climate services. Understanding users needs and how these manifest themselves in terms of the climate services (e.g., levels of information, scales needed) and access required. Understanding data and information gaps and their implications for decision making as a means to prioritise further action Supportive tools and resources, and training Develop and provide user- friendly interactive platforms that provide access to climate services that reflect that there are a number of such platforms (e.g., collaboration and a common framework) Building the capacity to use climate services to inform decisions, including knowledge and skills development as well as supportive infrastructure (e.g., IT) Tools and resources to enable consideration of social and economic implications in the short and longer terms Messaging and communication of data, information and knowledge, but also of decisions, including consideration of uncertainties. Need to consider means and mechanisms for targeting sectors and disciplines Educational and awareness- raising resources to support professional training and education The specifics associated with the above research needs, knowledge gaps and innovations often reflected the relative maturity of the climate service market (use and provision) represented by the participants, but also specific issues of concern within the different regions of the UK. There were similarities and differences [http://www.ukcip.org.uk/projects/engaging- with- climate- services- providers/] that in themselves support the suggestion for at least a UK- focused climate services, but also the need for a specific focus at a more regional level. It was suggested that there is space for research councils and other funding agencies to stimulate and support this work, but support from government departments and end- users is also needed to drive developments. This includes long- term funding to support the capturing and transferring of evidence and information for the development of climate service science and services. There was a question as to whether something similar to the UK Water Research and Innovation Programme (http://www.ukwrip.org) was needed. Climate Service network or community There is support for a climate service community, possibly at the UK level, but with elements that focus on the specific contexts and issues relevant to NI, Scotland, England and Wales. This could be linked and/or similar to the European Climate Services Partnership, but focussing on specific national and regional needs. The roles and advantages of such a community include: Opportunity to share learning and sharing of perspectives on challenges, opportunities and innovations Identify and map current activities, stakeholders and information needs Strong engagement of users, providers and purveyors

Fostering links and collaborations (enabling partnership opportunities) at both the research and innovation project level and beyond, including with those in other countries tackling barriers and disconnects Opportunity to support capacity building Creating a cohesive climate service community could help drive growth and avoid the risk of activities being side- lined or siloed, and grow capacities across the UK Providing a stronger national voice promoting priorities within and across the UK There is an overall preference to use existing and trusted mechanisms and structures rather than inventing new organisations avoiding duplications of effort, and stimulating and supporting working with others. Specific mention was made of organisations within the respective countries Climate Northern Ireland, Adaptation Scotland and ClimateXchange, Natural Resources Wales, the Climate Change Commission for Wales and the Climate Change Consortium for Wales, and the Environment Agency as well as the need to re- examine the nature and scope of Climate Services UK in this context. Such an approach would need to recognise that additional resources would be required, and that flexibility would be needed to allow suitable responses to meet emerging requirements. Next Steps Each of the workshops identified next steps [http://www.ukcip.org.uk/projects/engaging- with- climate- services- providers/ ]. These included the dissemination of the reports from the individual workshops (to be shared with participants of all the workshops) and of this summary report. They also included continuing to inform the workshop participants of developments around the Horizon 2020 Roadmap on Climate Services, including the launch workshop (Tuesday, 17 th March 2015 in Brussels), and keeping the participants informed of relevant research and innovation calls. Also identified was the need for further action related to continuing the dialogues on climate services and developing an appropriate climate service community. The use of existing mechanisms and providing occasional updates were seen as a first step, but there was also a strongly expressed need for continued engagement. Towards better understanding the need, participants were asked to share their thoughts on the nature and scope of the climate service community that would best meet their needs and support the growth of the UK climate service market. In doing so, deliberations at and following the workshops emphasised the need for targeted action towards establishing and supporting such a community. Specifically, it was suggested that there is a need for further discussions involving, as a starting point, NERC and Innovate UK to explore and identify possible mechanisms and opportunities. In addition the Environment Agency has indicated that it will be consulting on developing a proposal for a UK- wide providers' network to inform national capability and enable partnership opportunities.