Exploration Partnership Strategy. Marguerite Broadwell Exploration Systems Mission Directorate

Similar documents
NASA s Exploration Plans and The Lunar Architecture

Global Exploration Strategy (GES): A Framework for Coordination, Progress, and Future Opportunities

Constellation Systems Division

NASA Keynote to International Lunar Conference Mark S. Borkowski Program Executive Robotic Lunar Exploration Program

NASA Space Exploration 1 st Year Report

The Global Exploration Roadmap International Space Exploration Coordination Group (ISECG)

ESA Strategic Framework for Human Exploration

Global Exploration Strategy. Jeff Volosin Strategy Development Lead NASA Exploration Systems Mission Directorate

The NASA-ESA. Comparative Architecture Assessment

Exploration Systems Research & Technology

Exploration Systems Mission Directorate: New Opportunities in the President s FY2011 Budget

Human Spaceflight: The Ultimate Team Activity

The NASA-ESA Comparative Architecture Assessment (CAA)

RETURN TO THE LUNAR SURFACE Lunar Exploration Campaign. Next COTS Project?

High Level Forum, November Masazumi Miyake Director of International Relations Dept. JAXA

NASA Mission Directorates

Lunar Exploration Science Campaign: A commercial-leveraged lunar mission program

NASA s Human Space Exploration Capability Driven Framework

A RENEWED SPIRIT OF DISCOVERY

ESA Human Spaceflight Capability Development and Future Perspectives International Lunar Conference September Toronto, Canada

Stakeholder Expectations Definition Process

Testimony to the President s Commission on Implementation of the United States Space Exploration Policy

estec PROSPECT Project Objectives & Requirements Document

Office of Chief Technologist - Space Technology Program Dr. Prasun Desai Office of the Chief Technologist May 1, 2012

Earth is the cradle of the mind, but one cannot live in the cradle forever

Panel Session IV - Future Space Exploration

Status and Outlook for the European Exploration Envelope Programme

Analysis of European Architectures for Space Exploration

HEOMD Update NRC Aeronautics and Space Engineering Board Oct. 16, 2014

Science Enabled by the Return to the Moon (and the Ares 5 proposal)

Expanding human activities beyond LEO

Outpost Optimizing Science & Exploration Working Group (OSEWG) - Lunar Surface Science Scenarios

Once Explorers, Always Explorers Europe s Space Exploration Vision

Future technologies for planetary exploration within the European Exploration Envelope Programme at the European Space Agency

Plans for Human Exploration Beyond Low Earth Orbit. Doug Cooke, AA ESMD March 4, 2011

International Space Exploration Coordination Group Science White Paper Space Studies Board 2015 Fall Meeting 4 November 2015

Statement of Michael D. Griffin Administrator National Aeronautics and Space Administration before the Committee on Science House of Representatives

A RENEWED SPIRIT OF DISCOVERY

Future Directions: Strategy for Human and Robotic Exploration. Gary L. Martin Space Architect

C. R. Weisbin, R. Easter, G. Rodriguez January 2001

SPACE EXPLORATION AS A DRIVER FOR GROWTH ESA INITIATIVE TO PARTNER WITH PRIVATE SECTOR

NASA s Joint Robotic Precursor Activity: Providing Strategic Knowledge to Inform Future Human Exploration

2009 Space Exploration Program Assessment

X PRIZE Foundation.

Space Technology FY 2013

A SPACE STATUS REPORT. John M. Logsdon Space Policy Institute Elliott School of International Affairs George Washington University

ESA PREPARATION FOR HUMAN LUNAR EXPLORATION. Scott Hovland European Space Agency, HME-HFH, ESTEC,

Secretary-General of the European Commission, signed by Mr Jordi AYET PUIGARNAU, Director

NASA s Changing Human Spaceflight Exploration Plans

The Global Exploration Roadmap

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

SYMPOSIUM ON HUMAN SPACE ENDEAVOURS IAC-11.B3.1.8 THE GLOBAL EXPLORATION ROADMAP

The Global Exploration Roadmap

European Space Agency Aurora European Space Exploration Programme EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

U.S. Exploration EVA: Architecture and ConOps Overview. NASA-JSC EVA Office/J. Buffington

The Role of a Lunar Development Corporation in facilitating Commercial Partnerships in Lunar Exploration

National Space Exploration Campaign Report. Pursuant to Section 432(b) of the NASA Transition Authorization Act of 2017 (P.L.

ESA UNCLASSIFIED - Releasable to the Public. ESA Workshop: Research Opportunities on the Deep Space Gateway

Asteroid Redirect Mission (ARM) Update to the Small Bodies Assessment Group

Asteroid Redirect Mission and Human Exploration. William H. Gerstenmaier NASA Associate Administrator for Human Exploration and Operations

National Aeronautics and Space Administration

The Hybrid Space Program: A Commercial Strategy for NASA s Constellation Program

The Lunar Exploration Campaign

Workshop Summary. Presented to LEAG Annual Meeting, October 4, Kelly Snook, NASA Headquarters

IAC-13,B3.1,8x Bernhard Hufenbach ESA ESTEC, Noordwijk, Netherlands,

Beijing Lunar Declaration ILEWG Report

NASA Office of the Chief Technologist

estec REQUEST FOR INFORMATION Technologies, science payloads, and commercial services for lunar missions ESA UNCLASSIFIED - For Official Use

Status and Outlook for European Exploration Envelope Programme

Dream Chaser for European Utilization (DC 4 EU):

GLEX x12693 ASTEROID NEXT: A VIEW TO THE ROLE OF ASTEROID MISSIONS IN THE 2 ND ITERATION OF THE ISECG GLOBAL EXPLORATION ROADMAP

QUEST Vision for Exploration of Space

Exploration Systems. Program Overview. July 15, 2004 Associate Administrator, Office of Exploration Systems Rear Admiral Craig E. Steidle (Ret.

IAC-13-A THE ISECG GLOBAL EXPLORATION ROADMAP: STRENGTHENING EXPLORATION THROUGH INCREASED HUMAN ROBOTIC PARTNERSHIP

BEYOND LOW-EARTH ORBIT

IAC-13-A3.1.3.x17944 COORDINATED ANALYSIS OF TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT INTERESTS FOR THE GLOBAL EXPLORATION ROADMAP: THE GER TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT MAP

LEAG. Report to: Commercial Development Summit on NASA s Lunar Activities. May 13, 2008 Washington, DC

A Call for Boldness. President Kennedy September 1962

WHO WE ARE: Private U.S. citizens who advocate at our own expense for a bold and well-reasoned space agenda worthy of the U.S.

61 st International Astronautical Congress, Prague, CZ. Copyright 2010 by the International Astronautical Federation. All rights reserved.

ASTRA ERA and Future Robotics (for Exploration)

From ISS to Human Space Exploration: TAS-I contribution and perspectives

When Failure Means Success: Accepting Risk in Aerospace Projects NASA Project Management Challenge 2009

Evolvable Mars Campaign & SKGs

Credits. National Aeronautics and Space Administration. United Space Alliance, LLC. John Frassanito and Associates Strategic Visualization

Lunar Mission Operations Global Cooperation

Dream Chaser Frequently Asked Questions

16502/14 GT/nj 1 DG G 3 C

Structuring Global International Cooperation in Space Exploration

GROUP OF SENIOR OFFICIALS ON GLOBAL RESEARCH INFRASTRUCTURES

Climate Change Innovation and Technology Framework 2017

Update on UK lunar exploration plans

The Cooperation of Alcatel Alenia Space Italia and Politecnico di Torino on Space Exploration Scenarios

IAC-14.D2.8-A5.4.2 COOPERATIVE SCENARIOS FOR HUMAN EXPLORATION BEYOND LOW EARTH ORBIT

Martian Outpost. Erik Seedhouse. The Challenges of Establishing a Human Settlement on Mars

European GNSS Evolution

ISS and beyond: What is in there for You?

Legal Aspects of Space Exploration

A TECHNOLOGY ROADMAP TOWARDS MINERAL EXPLORATION FOR EXTREME ENVIRONMENTS IN SPACE

Where are the Agencies Human Space Flight (HFR) Programs Heading? USA (NASA) System Description Goal Remarks * Space Launch System (SLS) Program

Transcription:

Exploration Partnership Strategy Marguerite Broadwell Exploration Systems Mission Directorate October 1, 2007

Vision for Space Exploration Complete the International Space Station Safely fly the Space Shuttle until 2010 Develop and fly the Crew Exploration Vehicle no later than 2014 Return to the Moon no later than 2020 Extend human presence across the solar system and beyond Implement a sustained and affordable human and robotic program Develop supporting innovative technologies, knowledge, and infrastructures Promote international and commercial participation in exploration 2

Exploration Roadmap 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Initial Capability Orion (CEV) Mars Expedition 2030(?) Lunar Robotic Missions Lunar Outpost Buildup Commercial Crew/Cargo for ISS Space Shuttle Operations SSP Transition Ares I Development Orion Development Orion Production and Operation Lunar Lander Development Ares V & Earth Departure Stage Surface Systems Development 3

What is a Global Exploration Strategy? The compelling answer to the following questions: Why we are going back to the moon? - Themes What do we hope to accomplish when we get there? - Objectives Not a definition of how we will explore (operations & architecture) Global - refers to the inclusion of all stakeholders in the strategy development process - to ensure that as NASA moves forward in planning for future exploration missions - we understand the interests of: International Space Agencies Academia Private Sector Private Citizens Includes the Moon, Mars, and beyond as potential destination for exploration: Initially focused on human and robotic exploration of the Moon An evolving plan that will expand to include Mars and other destinations 4

NASA Exploration Lunar Activities addressing Themes Human Civilization Global Partnerships Scientific Knowledge Economic Expansion Exploration Preparation Public Engagement 5

Architecture Desired Attributes Enable lunar sustained presence early Develop infrastructure while actively engaged in science and exploration Ensure architecture is flexible to redirection Ensure architecture supports Objectives Support the establishment of Mars analog Allow the earliest partnership opportunities for commerce and International Partners Continuous and measurable progress Continuous and focused public engagement 6

Architecture Driven By A Strategy LAT-1 Global Exploration Strategy Development National Priorities Defined Architecture Assessment LAT-2 Detailed Requirements Defined Detailed Design Themes & Objectives Reference Architecture & Design Reference Mission Outpost First at one of the Poles Elements critical to US Operations Concept, Technology Needs, Element Requirements Maintain flexibility 7

Open Architecture: Infrastructure Open for Potential External Cooperation Lander and ascent vehicle EVA system CEV and Initial Surface capability Long duration surface suit Power Basic power Augmented Habitation Mobility Basic rover Pressurized rover Other; mules, regolith moving, module unloading Navigation and Communication Basic mission support Augmented High bandwidth ISRU Characterization Demos Production Robotic Missions LRO- Remote sensing and map development Basic environmental data Flight system validation (Descent and landing) Lander Small sats Rovers Instrumentation Materials identification and characterization for ISRU ISRU demonstration ISRU Production Parallel missions Logistics Resupply Specific Capabilities Drills, scoops, sample handling, arms Logistics rover Instrumentation Components Sample return ** US/NASA Developed hardware 8

Exploration Domestic Progress In December 2006, we released the exploration themes and objectives developed with input and participation from U.S. industry, academia, and science communities, NASA and 13 other space agencies. In 2007, our collective and individual communities have continued to make progress in determining how we will achieve our exploration objectives. U.S. A new space industry is developing and achieving new milestones in flight. Both domestically and internationally, the science communities enthusiasm and support for lunar science has grown and many research objectives have been identified. We continue to have executive and legislative branch support for exploration. We all must continue to meet our performance commitments and communicate the importance of this nation s space program to our stakeholders. 9

Exploration Domestic Progress NASA and Industry: NASA applauds the creativity and commitment by private industry to make investments to build our nation s capabilities. NASA Interest and Approach: We continue to provide assistance and opportunities to U.S. industry to augment their investment in building new capabilities that will also benefit NASA. Innovative Partnership Program SBIR/STTR being one of the larger sources of technology development funding in the Agency; supports mission directorate technology portfolios. Centennial Challenges Prize contests to stimulate innovation in NASA mission areas. Commercial Orbital Transportation System Space Act Agreements ESMD Commercial Development Policy To encourage the development of commercial space capabilities and markets and accomplish NASA s exploration missions at a lower cost and risk. Next Steps: Dialogue with industry through US Chamber of Commerce, conferences, workshops to identify specific needs and opportunities for collaboration. 10

Exploration Domestic Progress Mission Directorates: NASA s mission directorates are working very closely and collaboratively as we focus on the Moon and beyond. Discussing needs, exploring synergies, developing strategies and identifying partnership opportunities. ESMD & SMD working collectively on lunar missions and jointly utilizing the Science Mission Directorate s competitive selection process of notice of intent (NOI) and Mission of Opportunity (MOO). ESMD & SOMD are working closely on designing efficient operational systems and communication and navigation; identifying opportunities for utilizing the Shuttle and ISS for risk reduction for Constellation; performing technology demonstrations; and transitioning of personnel and infrastructure to support Constellation. 11

Exploration Global Progress International: US and representatives from 13 other international space agencies produced GES Framework Document, released May 31, 2007. Many countries developing national space exploration plans that include lunar exploration. Space agencies of China, Japan and India implementing lunar robotic programs. ESA and space agencies of France, Germany, Italy, and the UK are each studying lunar robotic missions for the 2012-2017 time frame. NASA Interest and Approach: NASA is committed to providing the transportation system beyond LEO. We seek to engage the GES 13 as well as other international space agencies in human and robotic exploration activities on the Moon. We will not be prescriptive in our approach we seek to coordinate plans in a manner that will advance our mutual goals for space exploration. Next Steps: Forming the Exploration Coordination Group Developing an international space exploration coordination tool Advancing potential partnerships through bilateral and multilateral discussions 12

A Look Ahead 2008 Identify opportunities for collaboration with the international community as both NASA and other countries identify their interests and priorities for lunar space exploration. Demonstrate On-Going Progress through NASA s LRO/LCROSS missions, participation in international missions to the Moon, and development of NASA s Constellation systems. Leverage resources and interests across other U.S. federal agencies to maximize synergies and capabilities. Engage industry for creative, cost-effective, innovative approaches to achieve our nation s exploration goals and objectives as suppliers, partners and stakeholders. 13

Working Together 14