DISRUPTIVE SPACE TECHNOLOGY. Jim Benson SpaceDev Stowe Drive Poway, CA Telephone:

Similar documents
Commission for Moon, Mars and Beyond

Space Exploration. Summary. Contents. Rob Waring. Level 3-1. Before Reading Think Ahead During Reading Comprehension... 5

Low-Cost Innovation in the U.S. Space Program: A Brief History

NASA s Space Launch System: Powering the Journey to Mars. FISO Telecon Aug 3, 2016

Tropnet: The First Large Small-Satellite Mission

WHAT WILL AMERICA DO IN SPACE NOW?

SHOULD SPACE TRAVEL BE LEFT TO PRIVATE COMPANIES?

A SPACE STATUS REPORT. John M. Logsdon Space Policy Institute Elliott School of International Affairs George Washington University

Stratolaunch FAQ Q. What was the inspiration for Stratolaunch? A. Q. What is the history of this project? A. Q. Why do this now? A.

Credits. National Aeronautics and Space Administration. United Space Alliance, LLC. John Frassanito and Associates Strategic Visualization

Billionaires want to help Trump send rockets to the moon again

John Klein: Tulsa's NASA connection made us a city of rocket scientists

Beyond CubeSats: Operational, Responsive, Nanosatellite Missions. 9th annual CubeSat Developers Workshop

STEM Teacher Roundtable Aerospace Engineering Sean Tully CRS/Cygnus Systems Engineering Manager

On July 8th, 2011, STS 135, the final space shuttle mission, launched from the

A NEW WAY TO LOOK AT THINGS. George C. Nield

Dream Chaser Frequently Asked Questions

Testimony to the President s Commission on Implementation of the United States Space Exploration Policy

The Hybrid Space Program: A Commercial Strategy for NASA s Constellation Program

NASA and private businesses must cooperate if Mars mission is to succeed

Human Spaceflight: The Ultimate Team Activity

Robotics in Space. Ian Taylor MP. Co-Chair, UK Parliamentary Space Committee VIIIth European Interparliamentary Space Conference

STATEMENT OF TIM HUGHES SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT FOR GLOBAL BUSINESS & GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS SPACE EXPLORATION TECHNOLOGIES CORP.

SpaceX launches a top-secret spy satellite for NASA

DID you hear about the guy who took off into outer space

HUMAN ENDEAVORS IN SPACE! For All Mankind

NEPTUNE 30. Micro Satellite Launch Vehicle. Interorbital Systems

60 YEARS OF NASA. Russia and America. NASA s achievements SPECIAL REPORT. Look Closer

10/29/2018. Apollo Management Lessons for Moon-Mars Initiative. I Have Learned To Use The Word Impossible With The Greatest Caution.

Abstract- Light Kite. things, finding resources and using them for our own use.

ESPA Satellite Dispenser

The Lunar Exploration Campaign

Flexibility for in Space Propulsion Technology Investment. Jonathan Battat ESD.71 Engineering Systems Analysis for Design Application Portfolio

The Future of Space Exploration in the USA. Jakob Silberberg

Orbital ATK JT File Use Case Matt Johnston. 5-Oct-16

THE UW SPACE ENGINEERING & EXPLORATION PROGRAM: INVESTING IN THE FUTURE OF AERONAUTICS & ASTRONAUTICS EDUCATION AND RESEARCH

SSC01-V-8 STATUS OF CHIPS: A NASA UNIVERSITY EXPLORER ASTRONOMY MISSION

Space Tourism: Risks & Rewards. J. Duncan Law-Green University of Leicester & National Space Centre

CUBESAT an OVERVIEW AEOLUS AERO TECH, Pvt. Ltd.

CubeSat Integration into the Space Situational Awareness Architecture

MAVEN continues Mars exploration begun 50 years ago by Mariner 4 5 November 2014, by Bob Granath

SPACE. (Some space topics are also listed under Mechatronic topics)

A n I n t e r v i e w w i t h P e t e r D i a m a n d i s. By Tim Ventura & Peter Diamandis, April 12, 2005

Sally Ride. LEVELED READER BOOK OA Sally Ride. Visit for thousands of books and materials.

Alan Shepard, : The First American to Travel into Space

Physical Science Summer Reading Assignment

NASA s X2000 Program - an Institutional Approach to Enabling Smaller Spacecraft

SPACE. DG GROW Internal Market, Industry Entrepreneurship and SMEs GROW/I1 - Space Policy and Research Unit

The Future for CubeSats Present and Coming Launch Opportunities 18th Annual AIAA / USU Conference on Small Satellites CubeSat Workshop

Understand that technology has different levels of maturity and that lower maturity levels come with higher risks.

Small Satellites for Space Weather Research

NASA Mission Directorates

A Feasibility Study of Techniques for Interplanetary Microspacecraft Communications

Where are the Agencies Human Space Flight (HFR) Programs Heading? USA (NASA) System Description Goal Remarks * Space Launch System (SLS) Program

National SG Directors Meeting October 17-20, 2007 Las Cruces, NM

Our team at the Big Idea Competition forum (NASA)

In the summer of 2002, Sub-Orbital Technologies developed a low-altitude

Stratolaunch FAQ Q. What was the inspiration for Stratolaunch? A. Q. What is the history of this project? A. Q. Why do this now? A.

IN SPACE SINCE One of those young space enthusiasts was Peter Reid, a UK-based LEGO fan who continues to build today as

X PRIZE Foundation.

A CubeSat-Based Optical Communication Network for Low Earth Orbit

Martin County s Astronaut

Sponsored Educational Materials Grades 6 8 TALENT FOR TOMORROW

A RENEWED SPIRIT OF DISCOVERY

Introduction. Contents. Introduction 2. What does spacefaring mean?

Two Presidents, Two Parties, Two Times, One Challenge

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

Scientists warn of space junk danger

Astronaut Edwin Buzz Aldrin climbing down the ladder of Apollo 11 and onto the surface of the Moon on July 20, (National Aeronautics

Space Challenges Preparing the next generation of explorers. The Program

Lunar Exploration Science Campaign: A commercial-leveraged lunar mission program

Design of a Remote-Cockpit for small Aerospace Vehicles

From ISS to Human Space Exploration: TAS-I contribution and perspectives

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

THE HISTORY CHANNEL PRESENTS Save Our History : Apollo: The Race Against Time An original documentary

Dave Podlesney Program Director Lockheed Martin Space Systems Company

Shooting for the Moon

Fleet Engagement. Mission Objective. Winning. Mission Special Rules. Set Up. Game Length

Istanbul Technical University Faculty of Aeronautics and Astronautics Space Systems Design and Test Laboratory

Space Shuttle Challenger Disaster A Personal Perspective. Stephen Coester

Rome, Changing of the Requirements and Astrofein s Business Models for Cubesat Deployer

Ozobot Bit. Computer Science Engineering Program

First Results From the GPS Compact Total Electron Content Sensor (CTECS) on the PSSCT-2 Nanosat

CubeSat Launch and Deployment Accommodations

Mr. Mike Pley. President and CEO,

ODU CEEVC and SAME Fall 2009 Seminar

A Call for Boldness. President Kennedy September 1962

RETURN TO THE LUNAR SURFACE Lunar Exploration Campaign. Next COTS Project?

Platform Independent Launch Vehicle Avionics

The U.S. Space Program: Rising to New Heights

Satellite Testing. Prepared by. A.Kaviyarasu Assistant Professor Department of Aerospace Engineering Madras Institute Of Technology Chromepet, Chennai

Current and Future Missions to the Moon

NASA Keynote to International Lunar Conference Mark S. Borkowski Program Executive Robotic Lunar Exploration Program

TEMPO Apr-09 TEMPO 3 The Mars Society

Chapter 6. Technology Development Options

NASA s Exploration Plans and The Lunar Architecture

Key Areas for Collaboration

Planetary CubeSats, nanosatellites and sub-spacecraft: are we all talking about the same thing?

A RENEWED SPIRIT OF DISCOVERY

JHU/APL CubeSat Initiatives. Andy Lewin 19 April 2007

Transcription:

SSC04-II-4 DISRUPTIVE SPACE TECHNOLOGY Jim Benson SpaceDev 13855 Stowe Drive Poway, CA 92064 Telephone: 858.375.2020 Email: jim@spacedev.com In 1997 "The Innovator s Dilemma" by Clayton M. Christensen became a popular book in the small satellite and launch vehicle communities. But like the weather, every one talks about Disruptive Technology but few do anything about it. In the 70s and 80s, people were looking for Paradigm Shifts, and since the resurrection of Donald Rumsfeld, a recent watchword has been Transformational Technology. But today s buzzword is now Responsive Space Systems. What does all this mean? It means buyers or users of space systems are craving innovative, timely, reliable, and affordable systems with state-of-the-art technology, not billion dollar pork barrel jobs programs that take five years to think about, then ten or more years to build, therefore relying on heavy, power-hungry, twenty year old technology. To illustrate the current schizophrenia surrounding space technology, a pair of Transformational (laser) Communications paper studies, worth $472 million each, have recently been initiated. This billion dollars worth of paper studies is due in 2007, but already the contractors are saying they might be late! Ironically, it is likely that a set of three microsats, at only $7 million each, utilizing industry standard laser communications technology in a space-based Wide Area Network configuration, could be flying before those studies are complete. This is disruptive technology it disrupts business as usual by leaping ahead of currently available or planned products. Last year saw some good examples of truly disruptive small sat technology and human space flight technology, and more is on the drawing boards for implementation in the next few short years. In January of 2003, NASA launched CHIPSat, a UNEX program won by a science team at Berkeley. SpaceDev designed the mission and the spacecraft, and built, tested and operated CHIPSat after its launch. The original fixed price for CHIPSat was $4.9 million, and it was to be developed over a period of only two years. After NASA lost two Mars missions, headquarters implemented an overly tough review regime, which

contributed to a total cost of about $7.5 million, and a development time of about three years instead of two still cheap and fast by then existing standards. Some Proud Fathers of CHIPSat Upon its successful launch, CHIPSat became this country s smallest high performance low cost satellite, the world s first orbiting Internet node, and the world s first satellite whose mission control and operations center can be any laptop computer located anywhere in the world that has a dial tone. Furthermore, flying in the face of the perceived need of the old heritage concept, nothing on CHIPSat had flown before none of the hardware, and none of the software. SpaceDev developed most of the critical subsystems from scratch, including our miniature high performance flight computer, our modular power conditioning and distribution system, our general purpose microsat operating system, and our Internetbased command and control software. We also developed space qualified an S-band transmitter and receiver, and successfully flew Dynacon s then unproven ACS system. With four reaction wheels to permit pointing and tracking of CHIPSat s targets, CHIPSat has been an unqualified success and has exceeded its planned life, and continues to do science for UCB and NASA. This is an example of disruptive space technology.

In March of this year, the Missile Defense Agency awarded a contract worth up to $43 million to SpaceDev to develop up to two sets of three formation flying microsats. At an average price of about $7 million each, these microsats will be cheaper than CHIPSat, yet will provide about twice the performance and capabilities of CHIPSat. This is disruptive technology, much like in the microcomputer industry, when you purchase a new computer every few years, you pay about the same, but get dramatically increased performance and capabilities. SpaceDev is consciously bringing the microcomputer way of doing business to the space industry, which has been bogged down for decades in the old mainframe way of thinking that bigger is better. Local Are Networked, Formation-flying High PEWrformance Microsats for MDA In 1999, Burt Rutan of Scaled Composites contacted SpaceDev and inquired about obtaining a rocket motor for a small space ship he was thinking about developing to win the $10 million X-Prize. After months of iterative design modifications to the motor and space ship, one fully integrated design for SpaceShipOne emerged, capable of winning the X-Prize, and using unique and proprietary hybrid rocket motor technology designed, developed and produced by SpaceDev.

A major aerospace company representative testified before the President s Commission On Implementation of United States Space Exploration Policy that they had developed the only new rocket motor in the United Space in the last thirty years, that it cost only $500 million, and took only five years. He then indicated that they could man rate it in a few more years and for a couple of hundred million dollars. Following this testimony was SpaceDev, which described that with only $1 million, and within one year of being awarded a propulsion contract, SpaceDev successfully developed and test fired the world s largest hybrid rocket of its kind. After only two years of development, SpaceShipOne launched its first human toward space, powered by SpaceDev technology, and in less than three years, SpaceShipOne, powered by SpaceDev, created the world s first private sector astronaut.. The Paul Allen SpaceShipOne team went from concept to man in space in three years for less than $30 million, less than it takes the government to even think about a serious project. In comparison to the typical aerospace giant way of doing things, this is a good example of disruptive technology. First Firing of World s Largest Hybrid Rocket Motor of its Kind

SpaceDev Hybrid Technology at Work - First Powered Flight on December 17, 2003 SpaceDev is currently under contract with the Air Force to develop a family of small, low cost, responsive expendable launch vehicles. Included in the SpaceDev Streaker family are: two sounding rockets or targets; an air launch capability to orbit one 60 kg microsat like CHIPSat for less than $3 million; and the ground launched version capable of orbiting 1,000 pounds for less than $5 million. The orbit insertion stage of Streaker is a variation of the space tug being developed by SpaceDev for the Air Force, and based on successful motors developed under an earlier NRO contract. This motor was recently test fired at SpaceDev facilities in Poway, California. The upper stage will produce about the same thrust as our technology proven for SpaceShipOne, but will be packaged differently for Streaker. The Common Core Booster will combine six existing techniques and technologies to produce hybrid performance equaling solid rocket motors, and exceeding that of pressure fed LOX Kerosene, while retaining their non-explosive nature and other positive aspects of hybrid rocket technology.

SpaceDev High Performance Streaker Family of Expendable Small Launch Vehicles SpaceDev plans to incrementally evolve a space plane design through a series of development cycles, from towed, to sub-orbital and finally to orbit. This country is in need of an affordable and safe human transportation to orbit, and I believe SpaceDev has the technology to get us there safely and affordably in the not too distant future. That would truly be disruptive technology. At SpaceDev, we believe that a space technology revolution is already underway, and we are happy to be a small part of it. Over the next decade I believe that all human space flight will be conducted in the private sector, that commercial deep space science missions will become common, that commercial space habitats will be orbiting earth and that near earth objects will begin to be utilized for their natural resources, in a variation on the theme popularized by Bob Zubrin in 1996 as living off the land. Only with such disruptive developments, primarily in the private sector, will humanity finally be able to soar above the horizons of Earth to the Moon, the Asteroids and Mars, and beyond to the starts. And the exciting things is, we can all help make this happen, in our own lifetimes.