Richard A. Fischer, Ph.D. U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center Environmental Laboratory

Similar documents
Cat Island Chain Restoration Project Brown County Port & Resource Recovery Department

T.S Roberts Bird Sanctuary Improvements Project

A Rising Tide: Conserving Shorebirds and Shorebird Habitat within the Columbia River Estuary

Tualatin River NWR and Wapato Lake BCS number: 47-37

Jackson Bottom Wetlands Preserve BCS Number: 47-14

Mud Slough Wetland Reserve BCS number: 47-19

Expansion Work Has Begun The perimeter dike for Cell 7 is now visible

Sauvie Island Wildlife Area BCS number: 47-28

Dredging, Beach Nourishment and. Bird Conservation Workshop Atlantic Coast Region

Chesapeake Bay adaptation Designing marshes for David Curson, National Audubon Society Erik Meyers, The Conservation Fund

Catalog of Upper Mississippi River and Great Lakes Region Joint Venture GIS Data March 2009 Version 1

Smith River Mouth BCS number: 86-6

Humboldt Bay NWR BCS number: 86-4

Klamath Marsh National Wildlife Refuge BCS number: 48-16

Oregon Dunes National Recreation Area BCS Number: 47-5

McKay Creek National Wildlife Refuge BCS number: 48-19

Black-crowned Night-heron Minnesota Conservation Summary

Malheur National Wildlife Refuge BCS number: 48-18

Corps Dredge Plan 2016 Emily Hughes Env Resources, USACE BUILDING STRONG

Killin Wetland (Cedar Canyon Marsh) BCS number: 47-15

Baskett Slough National Wildlife Refuge BCS number: 47-4

Smith and Bybee Wetlands Natural Area BCS number 47-33

Siuslaw River Estuary BCS number 47-32

Coos Bay BCS number: 47-8

Tahkenitch Creek Estuary BCS number: 47-35

Upper Klamath National Wildlife Refuge Complex Upper Klamath Unit and Hank s Marsh Unit BCS Number: 48-29

Collaboration and Planning to Implement the South San Diego Bay Restoration and Enhancement Project

Fernhill Wetlands BCS number: 47-13

Siletz Bay BCS number: 47-29

Title Marsh Bird Habitat Restoration and Management on Private and Public land in Arkansas Mississippi Alluvial Valley

Warner Wetlands / Warner Valley BCS number: 48-31

2012 STATUS REPORT NJ BEACHES AND INLETS PHILADELPHIA DISTRICT, USACE

TEXAS NAWCA PROJECTS

Stopover sites for migratory birds in the western Lake Erie basin. David Ewert The Nature Conservancy

OVERVIEW INTRODUCTION TO SHOREBIRDS MANAGEMENT FOR SHOREBIRDS TVA REGIONAL SHOREBIRD PROJECT ESTIMATING SHOREBIRD NUMBERS

Maryland Coastal Bays Colonial Waterbird and Islands Report 2018

American Bittern Minnesota Conservation Summary

RESTORE Act Bucket 2 Planning Public Meeting

REVISED DRAFT - 8/21/00 BIOLOGICAL OPINION ON THE OPERATION OF THE MISSOURI RIVER MAIN STEM RESERVOIR SYSTEM,

NAPA MARSHES RESTORATION Coastal Ecosystem Restoration Through Collaborative Partnerships

River s End Ranch BCS number: 48-21

Tiered Species Habitats (Terrestrial and Aquatic)

Red-breasted Merganser Minnesota Conservation Summary

Northeast Florida Coastal Wetland Restoration Program A Partnership Based Regional Approach for Estuary Habitat Restoration

New Jersey PRESERVING OUR WATERFOWLING TRADITION THROUGH HABITAT CONSERVATION!

Toronto s Urban Wilderness

U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service. My project. IPaC Trust Resource Report. Generated May 07, :40 AM MDT

Habitat Stewardship Series N E W H A M P S H I R E W I L D L I F E A C T I O N P L A N

Marine Corps Support Facility-Blount Island: Integrated Natural Resources Program Successes. E2S2 Conference May 12, 2011

Gulf of Mexico Avian Monitoring Network: Birds of Conservation Concern (August 2017)

RELATING TO THE MANAGEMENT OF CONSERVATION LANDS LOCATED ON THE SOUTHERN TIP OF THE EASTERN SHORE IN NORTHAMPTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

Priority Bird Species and Habitats U.S. Gulf Coast

Distribution of Piping Plover and Coastal Birds in Relation to Federal Activities on the Southern Coast of Long Island

Lake St. Clair Coastal Wetlands in 2050: Modelling Wetland Community Responses to Climate Change Water Level Scenarios

PART FIVE: Grassland and Field Habitat Management

IBA Monitoring Guide

APPENDIX K US FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE FINAL COORDINATION ACT REPORT

SENATE CONCURRENT RESOLUTION No. 158 STATE OF NEW JERSEY. 217th LEGISLATURE INTRODUCED JUNE 26, 2017

Ensuring habitat considerations in beach and shoreline management along Delaware Bay a bay wide perspective.

Erie County Van Trip. Pipe Creek Wildlife Area

Course 1- Salt Marsh Exploration

Project Summary. Predicting waterbird nest distributions on the Yukon-Kuskokwim Delta of Alaska

Wanaket Wildlife Area BCS number: 48-30

Species of Greatest Conservation Need Priority Species for NYC Audubon. May 12, Susan Elbin Director of Conservation and Science

Wetland Restoration at Blackwater NWR. Dixie Birch November 2, 2006

Matagorda Island Marsh Restoration An Adaptive Management Approach by Coastal Bend Bays & Estuaries Program

Conservation Design. Land Protection Plan PPP Lands Targeted for Protection within Focus Areas

Minnesota BCR 12 Assessment Summary

Piping Plovers - An Endangered Beach Nesting Bird, and The Threat of Habitat Loss With. Predicted Sea Level Rise in Cape May County.

Sound CARE Project Portfolio

Mannington Meadows Important Bird Area (IBA) Conservation and Management Plan

HUNGRYLAND BIRD LIST

The North American Wetlands Conservation Act: Working for Maine

North American Wetlands Conservation Act

Paulina Marsh BCS number: 48-20

Listed Birds along the Stony Brook Corridor Impacted by BMS Zoning Change

Washington Crossing Audubon Society Comments on the PennEast draft EIS

Marsh Bird and Amphibian Communities in the Thunder Bay AOC,

LOUISIANA NAWCA PROJECTS

Egg Dates for Species that Breed in the SAAS Chapter Area

Bird Conservation Priorities for the Mid-Atlantic & New England Coast Mitschka Hartley & Melanie Steinkamp

Protecting biodiversity at Great Salt Lake. On the ground at Kennecott Utah Copper

1. Monitoring Breeding Colonial Waterbirds in the U.S. Great Lakes Francie Cuthbert, University of Minnesota

National Audubon Society. Coastal Bird Conservation Program

ENDANGERED PLOVERS SINGING PRAISE FOR NEW NATURE TRUST LANDS

Great Lakes Coastal Wetland Monitoring: Providing a Basis for Prioritizing and Evaluating Restoration

ASSESSING HABITAT QUALITY FOR PRIORITY WILDLIFE SPECIES IN COLORADO WETLANDS

1. Qualitative Assessment... II-101

Ladd Marsh Wildlife Area BCS number: 49-3

Restoration of Emergent Wetlands on Steve N. Wilson Raft Creek Bottoms WMA in the Mississippi Alluvial Plain Ecoregion

Wings N Wetlands Bird List

Blue-winged Teal. Blue-winged Teal Minnesota Conservation Summary

Dynamic Forest Management: Forestry for the Birds

Wildlife Habitat Management on State Forest and Wildlife Lands

ASSEMBLY JOINT RESOLUTION No. 48 STATE OF NEW JERSEY. 218th LEGISLATURE INTRODUCED JANUARY 29, 2018

Bird Habitat Conservation at Various Scales in the Atlantic Coast Joint Venture 1

Upper Mississippi River and Great Lakes Region Joint Venture. Waterbird Habitat Conservation Strategy

Status of the Great Lakes Piping Plover & the Emerging Threat of Type-E E Botulism

GREAT LAKES/ATLANTIC REGION CONSERVATION

UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER RESTORATION LAKE ODESSA HABITAT REHABILITATION AND ENHANCEMENT PROJECT OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE MANUAL APPENDIX F

Transcription:

Regional Sediment Management - Beneficial Uses of Dredged Material Along Lake Erie and Tributaries Section 204 of the 1992 Water Resources Development Act Richard A. Fischer, Ph.D. U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center Environmental Laboratory Craig Forgette U.S. Army Engineer District, Buffalo Great Lakes and Ohio River Division

Buffalo District, Great Lakes and Ohio River Division Acknowledgements U.S. Army Engineer District, Buffalo Craig Forgette Regional Sediment Management, Program Manager Martin Wargo Craig Podsiadlo Jay Miller Andrew Hannes

Authority Section 204 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 established a program for the Corps to use of dredged material for ecosystem restoration. This provision authorizes projects for the protection, restoration, and creation of aquatic and ecologically related habitats, including wetlands, in connection with dredging in new project construction, and maintenance of existing Federal navigation projects, including harbors and inland waterways. Cost Sharing: Feasibility: 100% Federal as of April 2008 Implementation: 65% Federal, 35% non-federal $5 million max Federal Share

Historical Context Great Lakes Region Migratory birds are of great ecological and economic value to the area. Healthy ecosystems are necessary to provide places where birds can nest and raise their young, spend their winters, and rest and rejuvenate during migration. Since 1850, Lake Erie marshland from Vermilion, OH to the Detroit River has been reduced from over 1,500 square miles to less than 58 square miles Loss of wetlands and open-sandy beaches along Great Lakes shorelines, and riparian habitat along tributaries to the Great Lakes, have resulted in regional population reductions of many species of birds. Spawning, nursery, and feeding habitat for a wide variety of game fish and forage fish species contributes to healthy sport fisheries essential to economic vitality of the region.

Great Lakes Regional Habitats Wetland and riparian habitats important to regional bird communities: 1. Wet meadows, often dominated by sedges, whose soils tend to remain saturated or are very shallowly flooded. 2. Emergent wetlands, characterized by perennial rooted herbaceous vegetation. The term hemi-marsh is used to describe emergent wetlands with approximately 50% of the area in open water and 50% wetland vegetation. Dominant vegetation in emergent wetlands includes cattails (Typha), bulrushes (Scirpus), and sedges (Carex). 3. Shrub wetlands, dominated by woody vegetation < 6 m in height, including bogs, early-successional forested wetlands, and shrub-swamps (Cowardin et al. 1979). 4. Bottomland hardwood forests and riparian areas along tributaries

Great Lakes Regional Habitats Wetland-associated priority species: American Black Duck, American Bittern, Black Tern, Yellow-crowned Night Heron, Marsh Wren, Least Bittern, Virginia Rail, Bald Eagle, Common Snipe, Osprey, Pied-billed, Grebe, Common Moorhen, Sora.

Great Lakes Regional Habitats Riparian priority species: Associated priority species: Cerulean Warbler, Worm-eating Warbler, Wood Thrush, Louisiana Waterthrush, Black-billed Cuckoo, Scarlet Tanager, Eastern Wood-pewee, Red-headed Woodpecker, Kentucky Warbler, Red-shouldered Hawk, Long-eared Owl, Cooper s Hawk.

Regional Significance Shorebirds Most shorebirds using the region are long-distance migrants that require suitable wetlands where they can periodically stop to replenish their fat reserves. These staging areas must have shallow water (<20 cm or 8 in deep) and/or mud flat habitats with sparse vegetation (<25 % cover), undisturbed resting areas, and abundant invertebrate food resources to meet the high energetic demands of migration. The region has a wide variety of habitats that provide, or have the potential to provide, these requirements, including natural and managed wetlands, lake shorelines, river floodplains

Regional Significance - Waterfowl In winter, large numbers of waterfowl are supported along the Lake Erie shoreline portions of Ohio and Pennsylvania. Included are significant wintering populations of American Black Duck, as well as large numbers of Canvasback and Redhead.

Regional Significance Landbirds

Regional Significance Landbirds From Diehl et al., 2003

Regional Significance T&E Species Piping Plover Federally-listed as Endangered in 1985 (Great Lakes Popn.) Occurs in the western Great Lakes region, but not along Lake Erie. By 1973 nesting Piping Plovers had been extirpated from their former breeding range along the great lakes coastlines of Ohio, Pennsylvania and New York. Charadrius melodus

Regional Significance Piping Plover Preservation of existing beaches along the Great Lakes is important for this species. Protecting large areas of sandy, undisturbed habitat is required if the plover is to return as a nester. Limiting factor appears to be lack of suitable undisturbed breeding habitat. Mudflats are needed as migration feeding areas during April May and August September. Recovery efforts are attempting to expand the range of the Great Lakes populations; portions of region where the species formally bred have been designated as critical habitat by the USFWS.

Beneficial Uses of Dredged Material Along Lake Erie and Tributaries Design Guidelines for Avian Habitat on Islands Created with Dredgedmaterial, Maumee Bay, Lake Erie Wynn Road Section 204 Dredgedmaterial Disposal Project, Oregon, Ohio Open-lake Disposal Native Vegetation Community Establishment Bird and Fisheries habitat creation Onshore Disposal - Riparian Create/restore native coastal wetlands Bird and Fisheries habitat creation

Beneficial Uses of Dredged Material Along Lake Erie and Tributaries Presque Isle, PA Gull Point Ashtabula River, OH Onshore disposal/ Beach nourishment Open sandy beach habitat maintenance T&E Species considerations Shoreline disposal Rehabilitate riparian and wetland habitats

Beneficial Uses of Dredged Material Along Lake Erie and Tributaries Buffalo/Niagara Rivers, NY Onshore and near-shore disposal Native vegetation community establishment Bird and fisheries habitat creation

Design Guidelines for Avian Habitat on Islands Created with Dredgedmaterial, Maumee Bay, Lake Erie MAUMEE BAY This project is essential to the regional sediment management strategy for Western Lake Erie and Toledo Harbor where over 1,000,000 cubic yards (CY) of material is scheduled to be dredged annually and placed in the open lake.

Habitat Type XX

Challenges State of Ohio has expressed concerns about open lake placement of dredged materials from Toledo Harbor which may ultimately prevent dredging of Toledo Harbor unless beneficial use activities are expanded. Opportunities Beneficial Use of Dredged Material for avian and fish habitat Maumee Bay

Conceptual Habitat Restoration Unit Concept

Conceptual Habitat Restoration Unit Cross Section * Scale exaggerated for visual effect Buffalo District, Great Lakes and Ohio River Division

Succession on dredged material Islands Year 0-1 Year 3-4 Year 4-5 Year 7-10 Slide courtesy of Walker Golder, National Audubon

Maumee Bay Schedule Feasibility FY08-FY10 (100% Federal) Detailed Project Report NEPA Coordination Design FY11 (65% Federal, 35% non-federal) Plans & Specifications Construction FY12 (65% Federal, 35% non-federal)

Maumee Bay Feasibility Study: Where are we now? PROCESS Inventory existing conditions Problem identification Determine planning objectives and constraints Develop measures Combine measures to formulate alternative plans Evaluate alternative plans Select a plan DOCUMENTS Detailed Project Report Environmental Assessment or Environmental Impact Statement

Wynn Road Beneficial Use of Dredged Material Regional Sediment Management, Section 204 Project MAUMEE BAY

Wynn Road, Oregon, OH

Wynn Road - Project Alternatives Map Opportunities: Ecosystem Restoration

Habitat Type XX

Habitat Type XX

Heckman Ditch Wetland Creation

Habitat Type XX

Habitat Type XX

Project Partners City of Oregon Ohio Dept. of Natural Resources (ODNR) Toledo-Lucas County Port Authority Ohio Environmental Protection Agency US Fish & Wildlife Service Industry Interests Toledo University Lake Erie Waterkeeper Ducks Unlimited

Buffalo District, Great Lakes and Ohio River Division Ashtabula River, Ohio Section 204 Regional Sediment Management BUILDING STRONG SM

Ashtabula River Upstream of Project Area BUILDING STRONG SM

Ashtabula River Project Area BUILDING STRONG SM

Buffalo District, Great Lakes and Ohio River Division Presque Isle Section 204 Regional Sediment Management Beneficial Use of Dredged Material for Ecosystem Restoration BUILDING STRONG SM

204 Presque Isle Gull Point Erie, PA Atlantic Flyway High use by migratory birds Piping Plover Habitat Accretion & Erosion Lost 5 acres ( 91-06) Shore Protection to reduce storm damage to property Buffalo District, Great Lakes and Ohio River Division

Buffalo District, Great Lakes and Ohio River Division Problems Ongoing shoreline erosion along Presque Isle has resulted in the need for annual beach nourishment in order to maintain the public beaches for recreation. Erosion has resulted in reduced habitat for piping plover including USFWS designated Critical Habitat. Accretion of new habitat has been reduced due to limited sediment in the nearshore littoral system. BUILDING STRONG SM

Migratory Birds Presque Isle listed as Important Bird Area (IBA) Position on the landscape provides important resting stop for migrants: waterfowl shorebirds wading birds neotropical migrants More than 325 species of birds have been documented Supports State-threatened and endangered species, such as least bittern, American bittern, and Osprey

Buffalo District, Great Lakes and Ohio River Division State and Federal Habitat Areas

Buffalo District, Great Lakes and Ohio River Division Gull Point Example Current Conditions Historically, Presque Isle served as a nesting site for the Federally endangered piping plover, having supported approximately 15 nesting pairs annually until the 1950s. Despite Presque Isle s status as a historic nesting site for piping plover, vegetation encroachment and minimum sand replenishment has degraded habitat previously used by piping plovers and other migratory shorebirds, particularly on the eastern end of the peninsula, at an area known as Gull Point. BUILDING STRONG SM

Buffalo District, Great Lakes and Ohio River Division Gull Point Status and Habitat Listed as Designated Critical Habitat for the Piping Plover (USFWS 2001) Listed as Natural Area by PA-DCNR and is an Important Bird Area High use by many species of shorebirds, wading birds, gulls, and waterfowl. Important stop-over area during migration. Ranks as most suitable of plover habitat at PISP but additional enhancement/creation would increase habitat quality Current available habitat limited by reduced beach accretion and encroaching vegetation (mostly willows/cottonwoods) Invasive species also reducing available habitat (Phragmites)

Presque Isle Piping Plover Piping Plover Federally-listed as Endangered in 1985 (Great Lakes Popn.) Critical Habitat designated in 2001

Buffalo District, Great Lakes and Ohio River Division USACE Piping Plover Habitat Creation Cape May National Wildlife Refuge BUILDING STRONG SM

Buffalo District, Great Lakes and Ohio River Division USACE Piping Plover Habitat Creation Cape May National Wildlife Refuge BUILDING STRONG SM

We are here Buffalo District, Great Lakes and Ohio River Division Schedule & Budget Feasibility Design Construct 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Feasibility FY09-FY11 Determination of Federal Interest Detailed Project Report National Environmental Policy Act Coordination 100% Federal Design FY11 or FY 12 (65% Federal, 35% non-federal Plans & Specifications Construction FY12 or FY13 (65% Federal, 35% non-federal) $7.5 million Total

Buffalo District, Great Lakes and Ohio River Division Buffalo River Section 204 Beneficial Use of Dredge Material BUILDING STRONG SM

Buffalo District, Great Lakes and Ohio River Division Section 204 Buffalo River Overview Riverine ecosystem restoration Buffalo River and possibly portions of the Niagara River near Buffalo Brownfield Restoration Consider with Existing Conditions

BUILDING STRONG SM

PRESQUE ISLE

Questions? Richard A. Fischer, Ph.D. U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center Environmental Laboratory 502-315-6707