Technology, Innovation and Sustainability Hopes for a Green Revolution? Fred Steward Director: ESRC Sustainable Technologies Programme

Similar documents
The role of radical and systemic changes for green transformation

A Brief Introduction to the Multi-Level Perspective (MLP) T. Steward - November 2012

Transition to sustainable cities a sociotechnical approach for transformative innovation. Fred Steward Sustainable Innovation 2014, Copenhagen

Co-evolutionary of technologies, institutions and business strategies for a low carbon future

Policy Evaluation as if sustainable development really mattered: Rethinking evaluation in light of Europe s 2050 Agenda

An institutional approach to socioecological. agency, structure and evolutionary political economy

A transition perspective on the Convention on Biological Diversity: Towards transformation?

A network perspective on sociotechnical transitions : the emergence of the electronic book

Exploring elements for a transformative biodiversity agenda post-2020

Understanding the Web of Constraints on Resource Efficiency in Europe Lessons for Policy

THE ROLE OF GOVERNMENTS IN A CIRCULAR ECONOMY, A TRANSITION NARRATIVE

From disruptive technologies to transformative socio-technical change

New challenges and the future of NIS approaches Conceptual Considerations

SI-DRIVE POLICY DECLARATION: SOCIAL INNOVATION ON THE RISE CHALLENGES FOR A FUTURE INNOVATION POLICY

TRANSFORMATIVE (INNOVATION) POLICY

Customising Foresight

Experiments in climate governance lessons from a systematic review of case studies in transition research

Innovation in Governance:

Scoping Paper for. Horizon 2020 work programme Societal Challenge 4: Smart, Green and Integrated Transport

Sociotechnical Imaginaries in Research and Innovation Policy

What is backcasting & why do we need it

The Social Innovation Dynamic Frances Westley October, 2008

Transformation Dynamics in Utility Systems

Innovation Policy For Transformative change An Overview

A SYSTEMIC APPROACH TO KNOWLEDGE SOCIETY FORESIGHT. THE ROMANIAN CASE

Please send your responses by to: This consultation closes on Friday, 8 April 2016.

Werner Wobbe. Employed at the European Commission, Directorate General Research and Innovation

Stakeholder and user involvement in backcasting and how this influences follow-up and spin-off

"How to ensure a secure supply of raw materials in the global economy"

Introduction to the Special Section. Character and Citizenship: Towards an Emerging Strong Program? Andrea M. Maccarini *

Written response to the public consultation on the European Commission Green Paper: From

Foresight and Scenario Development

Enacting Transformative Innovation Policy: A Comparative Study

Technology Assessment. Global challenges and European prospects. Ortwin Renn June, 18, 2012 Copenhagen

Participatory backcasting: A tool for involving stakeholders in long term local development planning

Essay: The remarkable similarities in emerging Design research approaches and emerging Sustainable Development approaches

Challenge-led and participatory learning process to facilitate urban strategies for innovation on low carbon futures

Cooperation and Control in Innovation Networks

Climate Change, Energy and Transport: The Interviews

Creating Successful Public Private Partnerships Examining External Success Factors

MILAN DECLARATION Joining Forces for Investment in the Future of Europe

Data users and data producers interaction: the Web-COSI project experience

Enhancing Government through the Transforming Application of Foresight

Innovations in fuel cells and related hydrogen technology in Norway

Technology Platforms: champions to leverage knowledge for growth

System innovation for sustainable built environments

Research and Innovation Strategy for the Smart Specialisation of Catalonia. Brussels March 20th, 2014

RE-FRAMING ENVIRONMENTAL BEHAVIOUR CHANGE:

The Implications of 21st Century Transitions for Government Policy

Barriers to Research and Innovation for Solving Social Challenges

PhD course: Current issues in sustainability research (7.5 ECTS)

THE IMPLICATIONS OF THE KNOWLEDGE-BASED ECONOMY FOR FUTURE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY POLICIES

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES

Designing for recovery New challenges for large-scale, complex IT systems

TRANSITIONSCAPE: GENERATING COMMUNITY-BASED SUSTAINABLE TRANSPORT INITIATIVES

Firms Strategies in Alternative Energy Markets

Industry 4.0 and Implications for European Regions

Corporate Futures. Doing it Differently. Josephine Green Philips Design, Royal Philips Electronics

Online publication date: 15 July 2010

Re-thinking communication & dissemination strategies: towards practices of engagement & co-production in TRANSIT

Refining foresight approaches to crisis, inertia and transition

10 themes for eco-innovation policy

Information Societies: Towards a More Useful Concept

New Pathways to Social Change - Creating Impact through Social Innovation Research

The Impact of Foresight on policy-making - Drawing the landscape

Socio-technical transitions in farming: key concepts

POLICY BRIEF. Open and respectful stakeholder dialogue for sustainable raw materials management in Europe

Socio-Economic Sciences and Humanities. First Call for proposals. Nikos Kastrinos. Unit L1 Coordination and Horizontal Aspects

Colombia s Social Innovation Policy 1 July 15 th -2014

How can public and social innovation build a more inclusive economy?

FP 8 in a new European research and innovation landscape. A reflection paper

European Circular Economy Stakeholder Conference Brussels, February 2018 Civil Society Perspectives

Conclusions on the future of information and communication technologies research, innovation and infrastructures

Challenges and Expectations for Today s Innovation Support

The future agenda of research for sustainable development

Russian S&T Foresight 2030: Methodology, Structure, Place in S&T Policy

What is co-rri? Position paper on the conceptual framework underlying co-rri.

Designing Design Education for 21st Century India Contexts + Concerns + Challenges. author of

Susan Baker. Cardiff School Social Sciences Sustainable Places Research Institute Cardiff University

Disasters and the continental shelf: Exploring new frontiers of risk

Integrated Transformational and Open City Governance Rome May

6/14/2017. Engineering Future Cities The Value of Extreme Scenario Methodologies

Prof. Geraint Ellis. School of Planning, rand Civil Engineering Queen s University,

8365/18 CF/nj 1 DG G 3 C

Sustainable home heating practices Visions for 2050

1. Publishable final activity report

Technology Roadmaps as a Tool for Energy Planning and Policy Decisions

2nd Call for Proposals

Strategic Policy Intelligence setting priorities and evaluating impacts Ireland

"Promoting innovation and entrepreneurship in the North Sea Region and our knowledge base

OECD Green Growth Studies. Fostering Innovation for Green Growth

United Nations Environment Programme 12 February 2019* Guidance note: Leadership Dialogues at fourth session of the UN Environment Assembly

Science, Technology, and Innovation for Sustainable Development: National Policy Frameworks in Asia and the Pacific Apiwat Ratanawaraha

Community Innovation in Sustainable Energy

Developing Smart Specialisation through Targeted Support

Climate change and technology: innovation policy gaps

ORGANISING SUSTAINABLE TRANSITION: UNDERSTANDING THE PRODUCT, PROJECT AND SERVICE DOMAIN OF THE BUILT ENVIRONMENT

Moving Towards a Territorialisation of European R&D and Innovation Policies

MEGATRENDS THE TREND TOWARDS

Electric vehicle integration. Stakeholder engagement in the innovation process of electric vehicle integration

Transcription:

Technology, Innovation and Sustainability Hopes for a Green Revolution? Fred Steward Director: ESRC Sustainable Technologies Programme

Tony Blair - November 2004 we need a green technological revolution

David Cameron - April 2006 I want to lead a new green revolution that brings forward the best technology

The peculiarities of this mainstream discourse of green revolution Seems strangely at odds with the political battle for the centre ground But maybe revolution is OK, if it is confined to technology Anyway, reassuringly it confirms the political salience of our ESRC research programme

3m social science research programme 2002-2006 20 universities 50 researchers www.sustainabletechnologies.ac.uk

The intersection of two long standing ESRC research strands Environment Innovation

Sustainable Technologies Programme: Objectives Explicit To identify & explain the social and economic forces that shape, foster or inhibit sustainable technologies To evaluate policy options & influence policy to promote major improvements to resource productivity [Implicit] [Can we reconcile the broad societal objectives of sustainability & competitiveness?] [Is green growth a viable strategy?]

Two proposals arising from the research programme Technological revolution The idea that revolutionary change in technology is needed to address the global issue of environmental sustainability is right Social transformation The notion that radical technological innovation is separate from, or a comfortable alternative to, social transformation is wrong

The limits of incrementalism Greening of technology incrementalism does deliver but The constraints of the win-win enterprise level paradigm Relative improvements in resource use & pollution impact eg: household appliances, cars, aeroplanes Yet, environmental impact of household and personal transport continue to increase - the rebound effect

Diverse routes to green innovation & competitive success Biodegradeable pyrethroid insecticides 20% of global market Wind turbines 36% global market Aquabase water based paints Global leader

The social dimension of innovation The interactional vs pipeline model of innovation Coupling of technological and market opportunities The lingering death of technology push User driven models of innovation The entrepreneur Disruptive models of innovation

Technological determinism Emerging bio & nano technologies will deliver sustainability Key policy issue is research investment in new emerging technologies The knowledge economy/ sustainable society virtuous circle Relies on technology push model

Ecological modernisation Emerging technologies are more sustainable Upstream support is main policy concern Consumption downplayed

The paradox of digital dematerialisation The microchip The paperless office Pake 1975 The electronic cottage Alvin Toffler 1981 The World Wide Web Being digital Negroponte 1996 The death of distance Cairncross 1997 The weightless economy Quah 1996 The last book Jacobson 1997

World paper consumption

Social determinism Change will only result from social crisis Crises requires social interpretation sewage in the Thames: air pollution from smoke Societal collapse if interpretation fails A covert discourse?

A new socio-technical terrain Beyond technology push or social crisis Consumption and production forced to confront each other Multiple arenas of innovation and stakeholder engagement

Theme 1 Consumption as social practice Theories of consumption (Jackson) Social embeddedness of the consumer Kitchens & bathrooms (Southerton/Shove) Materiality and discourse in social practice Food systems (Green/ Flynn) frozen pea, chicken, chips network analysis of consumption/production systems & alternative trajectories for stakeholders

Theme 2 Innovation systems & governance National innovation systems (Winskel) Scotland & wave power; (Toke) wind & planning Local systems (Frederickson) waste recycling, (Walker) community energy schemes Policy on sustainable innovation (Pearson/Foxon) systemic reorientation of policy Sociotechnical systems Governance of transitions (Smith, Berkhout)

Theme 3: Emerging technology & sustainable transitions Nanotechnology (McNaghten/Wilsdon) upstream engagement Fuel cells (Hendry) entrepreneurs & incumbents Appropriate technology (Smith) ecological entrepreneurs Microgeneration (Watson) disruptive network change Dematerialisation of the paper text (Steward) networks & discourse in contestation between radical technologies gm trees vs the electronic book

Issues Consumers to be involved in innovation Multiple social sites influencing innovation Policies relevant to early phases of transition

Challenges for research and practice The dynamics of transformative decoupling innovation Systemic in nature Takes several decades Embraces social as well as technological innovation Diversity of actors

The limits of the greening of technology paradigm Incrementalism Path dependence/lock in Narrow technological definition of innovation

The specialness of revolutionary innovation Discontinuity Crucial importance for global competitiveness of disruptive, radical innovation Decoupling Critical need for global sustainability to decouple economic growth from environmental degradation Distributedness Systemic change in production & consumption

System innovations & technology transitions Focus on system innovation in contrast to either General socioeconomic change eg Freeman technoeconomic paradigm Or Specific new technological artefacts eg management literature on green products

Contrasted framings of innovation and entrepreneurship System focus Sociotechnical transitions Management of innovation Enterprise focus

Contrasts in innovation models Traditional Transitional Ego centred network The business enterprise Incremental Years Competitiveness Sociocentred network Sociotechnical system Radical Decades Sustainability

The merits of the transition approach Conceptualises innovation in relation to a prevailing domain of sociotechnical practice in contrast to technologies or sectors Embraces the complexity of a system and a diversity of actors Focuses on radical reconfigurations over periods of several decades Recognises wider range of reconfiguration in addition to substitution

A useful reframing Retrospective studies suggest that we can break out of lock in A new shared problem focus Theoretical plurality Challenge to move from the retrospective to the prospective

The building blocks of transition theory Systemic innovation Dominant regime Evolutionary economics meets constructionist sociology Niches & networks strategic niche management Scenarios & expectations - backcasting

Networks of transition

The multilevel approach

Emphasis on niche as source of novelty

Organisational actors in transitions Niche actors (Kemp, Geels) Path creators (Garud & Karnoe) Disruptive innovators (Christensen) Yet emphasis on evolutionary institutionalism

A new consensus Diversity of transition paths Multiplicity of levels

Policy needs A social equivalent of the coupling role in management of innovation New arenas bringing together upstream & downstream stakeholders Boundary spanning intermediaries

Current European context Need to resolve conflict between competitiveness (Lisbon) & sustainability (Gothenburg) agendas Investment in technology & appropriate regulations, important but not the whole story New focus on business and entrepreneurship capabilities for eco-innovation (Green papers on innovation & entrepreneurship) ETAP, IHDP, UNEP

Future orientation Green foresight? Not technocratic prediction but creation of dialogue about the future Acceptance of uncertainty and contestation Business as stakeholder More synergy between DTI & DEFRA Turn the revolutionary rhetoric plus research insight into radical policy innovation