Stage 2: eligibility screening. Stage 3: prioritisation. Stage 4: selection

Similar documents
Development funding allocation

IAPT What Now? What Next? Kevin Mullins Head of Mental Health 2 nd October 2015

SHTG primary submission process

CCG Improvement and Assessment Framework 2016/17. Briefing Document

Policy for the Surgical Release of Trigger Finger Policy Number 32 (Pan Lancashire)

ABHI Response to the Kennedy short study on Valuing Innovation

Critical and Social Perspectives on Mindfulness

Research Assignment for PSY x and 07x

Mindfulness-based Cognitive Therapies

NHS South Tees Clinical Commissioning Group. Governing Body. Agenda Item:

Evidence for Effectiveness

NHS Blackpool Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG) Policies for the Commissioning of Healthcare

Objectives. Background 10/25/2017

Enfield CCG. CCG 360 o stakeholder survey 2015 Main report. Version 1 Internal Use Only Version 1 Internal Use Only

Oxfordshire CCG. CCG 360 o stakeholder survey 2015 Main report. Version 1 Internal Use Only Version 1 Internal Use Only

Southern Derbyshire CCG. CCG 360 o stakeholder survey 2015 Main report. Version 1 Internal Use Only Version 1 Internal Use Only

South Devon and Torbay CCG. CCG 360 o stakeholder survey 2015 Main report Version 1 Internal Use Only

Portsmouth CCG. CCG 360 o stakeholder survey 2015 Main report. Version 1 Internal Use Only Version 1 Internal Use Only

Parenteral Nutrition Down Under Inc. (PNDU) Working with Pharmaceutical Companies Policy (Policy)

CCG Assurance and the Balanced Scorecard Balanced Scorecard An overview of the tool, and its role in CCG assurance. Khadir Meer Richard Wells

Sutton CCG. CCG 360 o stakeholder survey 2015 Main report. Version 1 Internal Use Only Version 1 Internal Use Only

Depression in adults: treatment and management

December Eucomed HTA Position Paper UK support from ABHI

Sutton CCG. CCG 360 o stakeholder survey 2014 Summary report. Version 1 Internal Use Only Version 1 Internal Use Only

Enfield CCG. CCG 360 o stakeholder survey 2014 Summary report. Version 1 Internal Use Only Version 1 Internal Use Only

13 December A NERA Briefing: Expert Workshop on HTA Workshop Sponsored by Pfizer

The NHS England Assurance Framework: national report for consultation Chief Officer, Barnet Clinical Commissioning Group

Mindfulness and Compassion as the Foundations of Well-being

Extract of Advance copy of the Report of the International Conference on Chemicals Management on the work of its second session

Presented by Menna Brown

CCG Organisational Structure

West Norfolk CCG. CCG 360 o stakeholder survey 2014 Main report. Version 1 Internal Use Only Version 7 Internal Use Only

Mindfulness in Mind 2019

NHS Vale of York CCG TURNAROUND ACTION PLAN

Herefordshire CCG Patient Choice and Resource Allocation Policy

Global Harmonization Task Force

An interpretation of NHS England s Primary Care Co-commissioning: Regional Roadshows questions and answers Rachel Lea, Beds & Herts LMC Ltd

Mindfulness Training in Kent

Innosup Supporting Experimentation in Innovation Agencies

Patient Choice and Resource Allocation Policy. NHS South Warwickshire Clinical Commissioning Group (the CCG)

NHS HMR CCG and NHS England Primary Care Joint Commissioning Committee 2015/16

Recast de la législation européenne et impact sur l organisation hospitalière

Horizon Societal Challenge 1: Health, demographic change and wellbeing. Jeremy Bray DG Research & Innovation European Commission

This factsheet covers:

Justice Select Committee: Inquiry on EU Data Protection Framework Proposals

GOVERNING BODY MEETING in Public 25 April 2018 Agenda Item 3.2

3. Title NHSE & Ipsos Mori CCG 360 Stakeholder Survey

United Lincolnshire Hospitals NHS Trust. Occupational Health & Wellbeing Service. Mindfulness for Wellbeing Courses Overview.

The future is here: Gaming, Gambling and the new challenges of treatment

Accountable Officer Report

E5 Implementation Working Group Questions & Answers (R1) Current version dated June 2, 2006

Gloucestershire Clinical Commissioning Group s Effective Clinical Commissioning Policies list Frequently Asked Questions

headspace Bairnsdale Private Practitioners: Model for Operations and Support

Both strategies are available on the CCG s website:

WG/STAIR. Knut Blind, STAIR Chairman

CCG 360 o Stakeholder Survey

Making It Your Own A PUBLIC ART POLICY AND PLANNING TEMPLATE. Arts North West Creative Opportunities 2012

Cambridge Cognition. Neuroscience Digital Health. 30 January 2018

IMPROVING WELLNESS WITH MINDFULNESS

Classroom Mindfulness

Life ahead plan. An aid to planning your long term recovery from cancer

Draft Plan of Action Chair's Text Status 3 May 2008

Title: care.data Pathfinder Stage CCG Recruitment and Selection Process

Web seminars make events more accessible to people as you avoid the time and cost involved in travelling to an event.

Using European Joint HTAs in local settings to adopt or to adapt, that is

IMHA Research. In short it is addressing two questions:

Health Technology Assessment of Medical Devices in Low and Middle Income countries: challenges and opportunities

An Essential Health and Biomedical R&D Treaty

What to expect at your outpatient consultation. Hospitals + Health Checks + Physio + Gyms

Subject Description Form

A review of the role and costs of clinical commissioning groups

Led by clinicians, accountable to local people. East Lancashire Clinical Commissioning Group: Equality & Inclusion Annual Report

MINDFUL NATION UK. Report by the Mindfulness All-Party Parliamentary Group (MAPPG)

South West Public Engagement Protocol for Wind Energy

What happens when you are referred by your GP to see a specialist?

CCG Assurance Framework. England

Taking the Pulse. How well are you supported?

Andalusian Agency for Health Technology Assessment (AETSA)

Eastern Cheshire CCG CCG 360 o Stakeholder Survey

Preparing for your Doctor s Appointment

GPC update on co-commissioning of primary care: Important Guidance for CCG member practices and LMCs

Webinar IMI2 - Call 15 Digital endpoints in neurodegenerative and immunemediated

Kernow CCG CCG 360 o Stakeholder Survey

Parkinson s World A transformational project by The Cure Parkinson s Trust

A brief introduction to... Evidence-informed policymaking

Relationships among formal mindfulness practice, mindfulness skills, worry, and quality of life

Population Based Needs Assessment for Specialised Palliative Care

The Scout Association Census 2018 Guidance for Completion

Immersive VR as a Tool to Enhance Relaxation for Undergraduate Students with the Aim of Reducing Anxiety A Pilot Study

4.1. Accurate: The information is a true reflection of the original observation.

HTA Position Paper. The International Network of Agencies for Health Technology Assessment (INAHTA) defines HTA as:

Guidance on the anonymisation of clinical reports for the purpose of publication in accordance with policy 0070

Report OIE Animal Welfare Global Forum Supporting implementation of OIE Standards Paris, France, March 2018

Engineering Grand Challenges. Information slides

Doing, supporting and using public health research. The Public Health England strategy for research, development and innovation

TWO BY TWO: A METHODOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVE ON THE USE OF EVIDENCE TO SUPPORT THE VALUE OF A HEALTH TECHNOLOGY

Mutual Learning Programme Database of National Labour Market Practices. Step-by-Step Guide

IMISA. A Course for Professionals. Next Intake: February Post-Graduate Certification Training in Mindfulness-Based Interventions

Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions Individual Fellowships. Cross-cutting issues in MSCA

The MindOptions approach to Mindfulness Skills Training

Transcription:

Digital therapy technology endorsement for IAPT project eligibility and prioritisation criteria NICE has been commissioned by NHS England to assess selected, digitally enabled therapies for depression and anxiety using ongoing data collection to determine whether there are improvements in service efficiency, and whether patient outcomes are at least as good as those achieved by NICE recommended, non-digital therapy. The NICE and NHS England digital therapy technology endorsement for IAPT programme has 3 workstreams: selection and assessment, developmental support, testing in practice. The eligibility screening and prioritisation criteria for selecting digital IAPT technologies for assessment are part of four stages briefly outlined below. For those technologies that NICE selects at stage 4, NICE will develop a digital IAPT assessment briefing (IAB) which an expert panel will review. The 4 stages in selection for assessment are: Stage 1: identification Stage 2: eligibility screening Stage 3: prioritisation Stage 4: selection 1

Eligibility screening NICE will complete an eligibility screen for all identified technologies. The aim of the screening is to identify those technologies that meet set eligibility criteria (see below), including having all the elements of an intervention recommended by NICE and that address a condition currently managed by the IAPT programme. To progress to the prioritisation stage, the digital IAPT technology will need to meet all six eligibility criteria (Table 1). The exclusion criteria shown in the table will also be applied and if any are relevant to a specific technology it will not progress to prioritisation. Table1: Eligibility and exclusion criteria for digital IAPT technologies to proceed to prioritisation for IAB programme Eligibility criteria Eligibility Exclusion 1. Condition treated by IAPT Designed to treat one of the 13 clinical conditions covered by IAPT. These are: Not designed to treat a condition covered by IAPT o Depression o Generalized Anxiety Disorder o Social Anxiety Disorder o Panic Disorder o Agoraphobia o Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder o Health Anxiety (hypochondriasis) o Specific Phobia o Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder o Body Dysmorphic Disorder o Irritable Bowel Syndrome o Chronic Fatigue Syndrome o Medically Unexplained Symptoms not otherwise specified A digital treatment which is not a psychological therapy (e.g. digital programmes which are designed to promote wellbeing, but are not treatment packages for depression, anxiety or medically unexplained symptoms covered by IAPT) 2

2. In line with NICE guidance Designed to deliver a treatment modality with content that is in line with NICE guidance for the relevant condition Not in line with NICE guidance 3. Product Designed to be delivered as part of a blended model of care, supported by an appropriately trained IAPT therapist Standalone products (e.g. mood diaries, leaflets) o Digital channels without clinical content (e.g. skype, email, SMS) o Products that rely solely on therapists to provide all of the clinical content o Platforms through which multiple digital therapy packages and other digital tools are available 4. Eligible population Adults Specifically designed for children 5. Evidence base There is at least one randomised controlled trial available on the technology in the condition under assessment No published RCT available 6. Technology accountability Supplied by an organisation committing to retain ownership and responsibility to maintain and update the digital therapy technology. No clear accountability for the technology 3

Prioritisation Digital therapy technologies that meet the eligibility criteria will progress to an Assessment Briefing, following a prioritisation process. Technology owners will be required to provide appropriate access to the technology for this purpose. They will also be invited to submit details of any evidence that evaluates the clinical effectiveness of the technology. NICE will collate available information and develop a summary of the elements in Table 2 to enable the NICE digital IAPT expert panel to prioritise digital IAPT technologies for an IAB. The NICE IAPT expert panel will consider these factors, to help them reach a consensus view of the priority in which technologies will be assessed. Technology owners will be contacted to advise them of when their product will be prioritised for assessment. Table 2: IAB prioritisation considerations Consideration to be given to the following elements 1. Potential impact of the technology to increase access to psychological therapy The technology is designed to target a small population currently underserved, e.g. hard to reach groups. The technology is designed to manage a condition for which there are currently limited digital therapy options. The technology has the potential to reach a large sub-population. 2. Evidence base There are multiple trials relevant to the technology which can be made publicly available to summarise and critically appraise There are non-inferior randomised control trials against face to face treatment and not against a waiting list control. 4

Consideration to be given to the following elements 3. Resource impact There is evidence that a cost consequences analysis has been undertaken by the technology developer There is potential that the digital therapy technology will improve efficiency compared with current management Selection The NICE IAPT expert panel will identify technologies for the NICE team to assess and develop an IAB. NICE will contact the technology developers to inform them of the prioritisation outcome. Assessment The IAB will include an assessment of evidence of effectiveness, resource impact, technical reliability conducted by NHS Digital and content conducted by clinical experts. The IAB will be considered by the expert panel to make a recommendation for inclusion, or not, in the IAPT programme. Those with a positive recommendation will be labelled Assessed as provisionally suitable for IAPT. Developmental support Promising products which do not meet required standards for use in IAPT as identified by NICE may apply for developmental funding administered by NHS England. When developmental work is complete, technology owners will be invited to re-apply for reassessment by NICE. Evaluation in practice Suitable products will be allocated, by NHS England, to a set of local IAPT services that express an interest in using the products and already achieve clinical outcomes that are not markedly below expectation. Each service will be responsible for identifying and training therapists in how to deliver each digitally enhanced therapy. Data will be collected as part of the ongoing data collection for the IAPT programme, and will be reviewed by the expert panel on a quarterly basis for 2 years. Analysis will be based on a before and after comparison. 5