OWL Phase A Review - Garching - 2 nd to 4 th Nov Adaptive Optics. (Presented by N. Hubin) European Southern Observatory

Similar documents
Adaptive Optics lectures

MAORY E-ELT MCAO module project overview

Modeling the multi-conjugate adaptive optics system of the E-ELT. Laura Schreiber Carmelo Arcidiacono Giovanni Bregoli

The Extreme Adaptive Optics test bench at CRAL

MAORY ADAPTIVE OPTICS

Design parameters Summary

Calibration of AO Systems

AVOIDING TO TRADE SENSITIVITY FOR LINEARITY IN A REAL WORLD WFS

GMT Instruments and AO. GMT Science Meeting - March

Content. Instrumentation Programmes at ESO Mark Casali. Instrumentation at ESO. Future Instrument Programmes

The MCAO module for the E-ELT.

Non-adaptive Wavefront Control

Optimization of coupling between Adaptive Optics and Single Mode Fibers ---

Robo-AO: Robotic Laser Guide Star Adaptive Optics on the Palomar 60 in Christoph Baranec (PI) & Nick Law (PS)

GRAAL on-sky performance with the AOF

Wavefront sensor design for NGAO: Assumptions, Design Parameters and Technical Challenges Version 0.1

Potential benefits of freeform optics for the ELT instruments. J. Kosmalski

Adaptive Optics Lectures

Wavefront control for highcontrast

Focal Plane and non-linear Curvature Wavefront Sensing for High Contrast Coronagraphic Adaptive Optics Imaging

GROUND LAYER ADAPTIVE OPTICS AND ADVANCEMENTS IN LASER TOMOGRAPHY AT THE 6.5M MMT TELESCOPE

MAORY for E-ELT. Emiliano Diolaiti (INAF Osservatorio Astronomico di Bologna) On behalf of the MAORY Consortium

Adaptive Optics Overview (Astronomical)

A prototype of the Laser Guide Stars wavefront sensor for the E-ELT multi-conjugate adaptive optics module

Raven a scientific and technical Multi-Object Adaptive Optics (MOAO) demonstrator

PhD Defense. Low-order wavefront control and calibration for phase-mask coronagraphs. Garima Singh

High-contrast imaging with E-ELT/HARMONI

Bruce Macintosh for the GPI team Presented at the Spirit of Lyot conference June 7, 2007

PYRAMID WAVEFRONT SENSOR PERFORMANCE WITH LASER GUIDE STARS

Wide-field Adaptive Optics for MOSAIC

Development of a Low-order Adaptive Optics System at Udaipur Solar Observatory

Designing Adaptive Optics Systems

Ultra-Flat Tip-Tilt-Piston MEMS Deformable Mirror

12.4 Alignment and Manufacturing Tolerances for Segmented Telescopes

MALA MATEEN. 1. Abstract

PCS: E-ELT Planet finder

ΘΘIntegrating closedloop adaptive optics into a femtosecond laser chain

Fratricide effect on ELTs

Proposed Adaptive Optics system for Vainu Bappu Telescope

Adaptive Optics for LIGO

Segmented deformable mirrors for Ground layer Adaptive Optics

GPI INSTRUMENT PAGES

Status of the DKIST Solar Adaptive Optics System

The Adaptive Optics Facility Module GRAAL on its Way to Final Validation

What is the source of straylight in SST/CRISP data?

Effect of segmented telescope phasing errors on adaptive optics performance

Science Detectors for E-ELT Instruments. Mark Casali

Wavefront Sensing In Other Disciplines. 15 February 2003 Jerry Nelson, UCSC Wavefront Congress

UCLA Adaptive Optics for Extremely Large Telescopes 4 Conference Proceedings

NGAO NGS WFS design review

Keck Telescope Wavefront Errors: Implications for NGAO

Effect of segmented telescope phasing errors on adaptive optics performance

On-sky validation of LIFT on GeMS

CHARA AO Calibration Process

High-contrast imaging with E-ELT/METIS. Olivier Absil Université de Liège

MODULAR ADAPTIVE OPTICS TESTBED FOR THE NPOI

Puntino. Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensor for optimizing telescopes. The software people for optics

High contrast imaging lab

The MOAO System of the IRMOS Near-Infrared Multi-Object Spectrograph for TMT

A Ground-based Sensor to Detect GEOs Without the Use of a Laser Guide-star

ELT Instrument Roadmap Mark Casali

Infrared detectors for wavefront sensing

OWL OPTICAL DESIGN, ACTIVE OPTICS AND ERROR BUDGET

Gemini 8m Telescopes Instrument Science Requirements. R. McGonegal Controls Group. January 27, 1996

Optimization of Apodized Pupil Lyot Coronagraph for ELTs

E-ELT Programme Science drivers

Wavefront sensing for adaptive optics

1.6 Beam Wander vs. Image Jitter

Payload Configuration, Integration and Testing of the Deformable Mirror Demonstration Mission (DeMi) CubeSat

Wavefront sensing for adaptive optics

Design of wide-field imaging shack Hartmann testbed

Predicting the Performance of Space Coronagraphs. John Krist (JPL) 17 August st International Vortex Workshop

Breadboard adaptive optical system based on 109-channel PDM: technical passport

The Self-Coherent Camera : a focal plane sensor for EPICS?

SHARK-NIR overview and optomechanical design: an update

The NAOS visible wave front sensor

Design and test of a high-contrast imaging coronagraph based on two. 50-step transmission filters

M1/M2 Ray Tracer. for High-Speed Mirror Metrology in the E-ELT. Ron Holzlöhner, 21 Sep 2016 European Southern Observatory (ESO)

Tenerife, Canary Islands, Spain International Conference on Space Optics 7-10 October 2014 THE LAM SPACE ACTIVE OPTICS FACILITY

OPTICON Firenze Meeting 8-10 November 2004

OPTINO. SpotOptics VERSATILE WAVEFRONT SENSOR O P T I N O

The First Light of the Subaru Laser Guide Star Adaptive Optics System

ABSTRACT 1. INTRODUCTION

The E-ELT Instrumentation Roadmap Presentation to the Project Science Team

Reference and User Manual May, 2015 revision - 3

Lecture 7: Wavefront Sensing Claire Max Astro 289C, UCSC February 2, 2016

Evaluation of Performance of the MACAO Systems at the

GLAO instrument specifications and sensitivities. Yosuke Minowa

Ocular Shack-Hartmann sensor resolution. Dan Neal Dan Topa James Copland

Phase Retrieval Techniques for Adaptive Optics

Towards Contrast for Terrestrial Exoplanet Detection:

AgilOptics mirrors increase coupling efficiency into a 4 µm diameter fiber by 750%.

Comparative Performance of a 3-Sided and 4-Sided Pyramid Wavefront Sensor. HartSCI LLC, 2555 N. Coyote Dr. #114, Tucson, AZ

Report presented by the ELT Telescope Design Working Group (WG4) May 4th Issue 3

MAD the ESO multi-conjugate adaptive optics demonstrator

The SPHERE XAO system SAXO: integration, test and laboratory performance.

An Update on the Installation of the AO on the Telescopes

The Wavefront Control System for the Keck Telescope

FFREE: a Fresnel-FRee Experiment for EPICS, the EELT planets imager

Subject headings: turbulence -- atmospheric effects --techniques: interferometric -- techniques: image processing

Transcription:

OWL Phase A Review - Garching - 2 nd to 4 th Nov 2005 Adaptive Optics (Presented by N. Hubin) 1

Overview Adaptive Optics concepts and performances Single Conjugate Adaptive Optics (SCAO) Ground Layer Adaptive Optics (GLAO) Multi Object Adaptive Optics (MOAO) Multi-Conjugate Adaptive Optics (MCAO) High Contrast Adaptive Optics (EPICS) Demonstrators & pathfinders MCAO demonstrator (MAD) High Order Test bench (HOT) VLT Adaptive Optics Facility VLT Planet Finder Required field tests on Laser Guide Star issues Enabling technology roadmap Deformable mirrors & wavefront sensor detectors Real Time Computers & algorithms Lasers and beam transport/projection 2

ADAPTIVE OPTICS CONCEPTS & PERFORMANCE 3

Single Conjugate AO concept On-axis, NIR, medium Strehl ratio AO using NGSs Visible Shack-Hartmann WFS IR pyramid WFS 97 2 sub-apertures Zero noise 582 2 pixels CCD Low noise 194 2 pixels IR detector 500 Hz update frequency 2 patrolled field 98 2 actuators 2.5 m Deformable Mirror at M6 Computing power: 2000 x NAOS Or 10 x VLT AO Facility 4

SCAO Wavefront sensor pick-up arm Patrolling pick-up arm in the Adapter-rotator Same wavefront unit (s) for all 6 focal stations 300mm 5

Single Conjugate AO performance * Good seeing: 0.53 Bad seeing: 1 K, H, J K, H, J K, H, J Strehl ratio Strehl ratio Strehl ratio Strehl ratio Photons/sub-aperture/frame Photons/sub-aperture/frame K, H, J *AO only Off-axis angle ( ) 6 Off-axis angle ( )

Ground Layer AO concept 3-6 FoV Near IR Seeing Reducer using NGSs 6 Visible Shack-Hartmann WFSs 97 2 sub-apertures (id. SCAO) 6 Patrolled FoV Zero noise 582 2 pixels CCD 500 Hz update frequency 2.5 m Deformable Mirror at M6 3-6 and narrow FoV modes Computing power: 10 x VLT AO Facility 0.3 10 4 x AOF with full reconst. 7

Ground Layer AO performance* Gain in EE in 50 mas pixel Good seeing: 0.53 K, H, J Gain in EE in 50 mas pixel Bad seeing: 1 K, H, J Photons/sub-aperture/frame Photons/sub-aperture/frame K-band Lo=25m 6 K-band Lo=25m *AO only Position in ( ) 8 Position in ( )

Multi-Conjugate AO concept 1-2 FoV, Near IR, medium Strehl ratio AO using NGSs 6 Visible Shack-Hartmann WFSs 97 2 sub-apertures (SCAO) 6 Patrolled FoV Zero noise 582 2 pixels CCD 500 Hz update frequency 2.5 m Deformable Mirror at M6 3.5 m Deformable Mirror at 7km 145 2 actuators over meta-pupil Computing power 10 4 x VLT AOF 1 corrected FoV 9

Multi-Conjugate AO performance* Good seeing: 0.53, 1 FOV 6 2 Strehl ratio K, H, J Bad seeing: 1, 1 FOV Photons/sub-aperture/frame Strehl ratio K, H, J Strehl ratio K, H, J *AO only Position from center ( ) Position from center ( ) 10 NGS flux: 1ph/subap/frame

Sky coverage (%) 80 60 40 20 GLAO & MCAO sky coverage using NGSs North Galactic Pole, 6 FoV Sr(K) = 6% EE(K) x 3 Sr(K) = 25% EE(K) x 3.5 Sr(K) = 29% EE(K) x 4.5 Left to right m R <16 m R <17 m R <18 m R <19 l=0, b=50, 6 FoV Sr(K) = 29% EE(K) x 4.5 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 Number of Natural Guide Stars Sr(K) = 6% EE(K) x 3 MCAO GLAO Sky coverage (%) 80 60 40 20 Sr(K) = 25% EE(K) x 3.5 11 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 Number of Natural Guide Stars

Multi Conjugate AO Point Spread Functions Good seeing, 0.5 K-Band on-axis [1,0 ] [30, 30 ] Log stretch 24% 23% 23% Bad seeing, 1 on-axis [1,0 ] [30, 30 ] 4.0% 3.7% 3.7% NGS flux: 1 ph / subap / frame 12

Multi Conjugate AO Point Spread Functions Good seeing, 0.5 J-Band on-axis [1,0 ] [30, 30 ] 1.4% 1.3% 1.3% Bad seeing, 1 on-axis [1,0 ] [30, 30 ] 8.5 e-5 8.7e-5 8.5e-5 NGS flux: 1 ph / subap / frame 13

Multi-Object AO concept Multi narrow field AO over 6 FoV using NGSs 10 Vis. WFSs patrolling 6, f=500hz 1 st stage GLAO using M6 DM 10 kact. MDMs for WFSs & IFUs Optimized correction in N directions Linear MDMs; pseudo closed loop Computing power 3 10 5 x NAOS x10 14

Multi-Object AO performance 30 20 10 1 seeing H band AC114 Abell 1689 UDF COSMOS CFHTLS-d1 AC114 Abell 1689 UKIDSS-XMM-LSS UDF COSMOS CFHTLS-d1 EE Gain in 50 mas pixel 15 10 5 8 NGSs 1 seeing H band 8 NGSs 3 NGSs 3 NGSs 15 EE in 50 mas pixel (%) UKIDSS-XMM-LSS

EPICS: Earth-like Planets Imaging Camera Spectrograph Primary science goal: Rocky planets in habitable zone up to 25 pc in VIS and NIR Goal: contrast of 2 10-10 at 50 mas Need high Strehl Ratio large number of actuators: 1.7x10 5 Need high halo rejection fast correction Double stage system Shack-Hartmann 500 2 at 1 khz, Fourier reconstructor Pyramid 150 2 at 3 khz, Matrix-Vector reconstructor Computationally feasible with OWL/SPARTA + ~10 years Very tight error budget for systematic errors control Need active correction of non common-path errors at 0.3 nm rms (similar achieved with HCIT) for spat. freq. 10 75 cycles/pupil *HCIT: High Contrast Imaging Test bed TPFC 16

EPICS Adaptive Optics performance (AO only) Mv=7 G2 star at 25 pc Strehl (J band) 91 % Perfect Coronagraph Normalized halo intensity 10-6 10-7 10-8 10-9 Area dominated by chromatic seeing Area corrected by PYR system Area corrected by SH system +high Strehl Uncorrected area 0.01 0.1 1.00 Separation ( ) 12 st stage AO stages only λ=1400nm 0.4 1.6 17

Reduction of Co-phasing residuals after XAO Effect on coronagraphic image, λ = 1600 nm PSF without corono - - - Coro. PSF without correction of cophasing errors _. _. Coro. PSF after correction by DM 2 Initial co-phasing errors: piston, tip-tilt: 20 nm rms Corrected by DM 2 +PYR with d=65 cm inter-actuator spacing 6 nm rms. 18

Laser Guide Star Adaptive Optics: GLAO Use single LGS on ELT Cone effect Low Strehl ratio Ground layer Correction High sky coverage 1 st analysis shows promising results Assumed ELT LGSs issues solved (spot elongation, ) EE gain in 50 mas Good seeing: 0.53 LGS Height [km] K, H, J 19

Multi Conjugate AO with Laser Guide Stars Good seeing: 0.53 5 LGSs High sky coverage High WFS flux More sub-apertures More DMs Assumed ELT LGSs issues solved (spot elongation, ) Strehl ratio K-Band Optimized FoV: 2 Position from center ( ) 20

Demonstrators and Pathfinders 21

MAD: The GLAO & MCAO demonstrator Demonstrate Ground Layer and Multi Conjugate AO Star Oriented 3 SH WFSs Layer Oriented pyr. WFS Study control algorithms 3 D turbulence generator MAD status: SCAO GLAO loop: 06.05 MCAO loop:10.05 Layer oriented: 2Q 06 On-sky 3Q 06 Study calibration issues: Non-common aberrations Interaction matrix 22

MAD design & implementation 23

MAD preliminary results Star oriented mode 3 Visible SH WFSs 8 2 sub-apertures K-band GS #1 45 on-axis 45 45 GS #3 GS #2 24

MCAO closed loop of MAD K Band; Seeing 0.7 ; τo=3.3 ms GS #1 45 on-axis 45 45 GS #3 GS #2 Gs magnitudes = 8 200Hz frame rate 25

HOT: High Order Test bench Demonstrate Extreme AO & High contrast imaging Study optimum wavefront sensor for high contrast imaging Spatially filtered SH WFS with weighted centre of Gravity Pyramid WFS in diffraction regime w &w/o modulation Study error sources & final contrast: misregistration, aliasing,..) Study Point Spread Function characteristics & residual aberrations Investigate coronagraph concepts Study pupil segmentation effect on final PSF after AO correction Validate new components: Micro Deformable mirrors New low noise CCD for WFS ESO Real Time computer platform New control algorithms Focal plane WFS Super polished filters for differential imaging 26

HOT: a high contrast imaging test bench 60 actuators bimorph mirror as woofer Turbulence Generator 32x32 actuators MACAO test bench Pyramid & Shack Hartmann WFS IR Camera Real-Time Computer Phase screens 27 0 noise CCD

VLT AO Facility: A Pathfinder for OWL Deformable M2 Concept of Active/Adaptive Telescope Four Sodium Laser Guide Stars 2 GLAO syst. (GALACSI, GRAAL) 10 NIR seeing reducer (HAWK-I) 1 visible seeing reducer (MUSE) Laser Tomography AO: Sr(v)~10% Enabling technologies: 1.1 m convex aspherical Deformable M2, 1170 act. 2 mm Zerodur thin shell Raman fibre laser ~0 noise, 240 2 pix., 1kHz WFS-CCD Computing power 200 x NAOS Laboratory testing facility (ASSIST) GALACSI MUSE 4 LGSs GRAAL Hawk-I Laser Room 28

VLT Planet Finder: An XAO Pathfinder for OWL Planet detection with contrast 10-5 at 0.1 separation Detection Extreme AO (SR ~ 90% in H band) Coronagraphy (contrast at 0.1 separation) Differential imaging (residual halo) Characterization Integral Field Spectroscopy Visible Channel Imaging / Polarimetry (SR 90% in H at 65% in R) 29 INSU Courtesy J. L. Beuzit ETH Zurich

Required field tests on LGS issues Perspective spot elongation sodium layer H =10km Cone effect Defocus FP6 H=100km D = 100m θ 10 Dynamic refocusing Custom CCD ELT Number of LGSs Dynamic refocusing WFS spot aberrations: Optical corrector in WFS Fratricide effects: Number of launch telescopes, Pulsed lasers Low order with NGS: In some cases, helped by outer scale NEW LGS CONCEPTS BETTER SUITED FOR ELTs NEEDED?

Enabling technology roadmap 31

Large Deformable mirrors: from VLT to OWL Hexapod for centring & fine focusing Cold Plate; heat evacuation & act. attachment VLT Deformable M2 Ø 1.1m convex 1170 actuators 29 mm pitch 1 ms response Stroke 50 / 1.5 µm OWL M6 2.6 x 2.4 m flat 7000 actuators 24 mm pitch 1 ms response Stroke 25-90 µm Inter-stroke:3-6 µm 2mm Thin Shell Reference body Lightweight reference body Zerodur or SiC 32

CILAS High density Deformable Mirror roadmap VLT Planet Finder 41 2 act. Piezo DM (1370) 4.5 mm pitch; 10 KHz 8 µm stroke 19 actuators; continuous membrane 1mm pitch 4.5 µm mech. stroke for 60V WF error: 1.5nm rms Funded by OPTICON OWL Planet Finder & MOAO 10k & 100 k actuators 1 mm pitch; 3-5 KHz 1-5 µm stroke WF error: 1-10 nm rms 2k actuators with 1mm pitch 5-10 µm mechanical stroke 1-2 µm inter-actuator stroke 10 nm rms 33

Wavefront Sensor detectors roadmap MPI VLT Planet Finder 240 2 pix. L3CCD 8 outputs 1.5 kfr/s, 90 Mpixels/s 0.2 e - RON Blue QE low depletion IR WFS detector R&D OPTICON-JRA3 264 2 pixels 528 outputs 1.1 kfr/s 3 e - RON High QE deep depletion OWL SC- GL- MC- MO- X AO 600 2 to 1000 2 pixels 500 to 1 kfr / s (goal 3kHz) 0 e - RON High QE Good PSF 34

Real-Time Computers roadmap SPARTA-for-OWL concept shows feasibility of the RTC for OWL projecting the current architecture for VLT 2 ng Gen AO Even better architecture will be available at that time Gigabit Ethernet VITA-46 VXS LCU CPU CPU CPU CPU Monitoring XMC FPGA FPGA XMC XMC FPGA FPGA XMC Hard Real Time System Size (grad. * act. * freq) G-FMAC Ratio SCAO GLAO MOAO MCAO 13800*7600@500Hz 13800*7600@500Hz 82800*7600@500Hz 14400*7600@500Hz 43200*7600@500Hz 82800*24000@500Hz 52 52 314 54 164 993 1 1 6 1 3 19 SCAO@52 GMAC achievable in 3-4Y Moore s law in 10 Y factor 100 SCAO@52 5200 G-FMAC: Giga Floating Point Multiply accumulate XAO 400.000*200.000@1kHz 35000*18000@3 khz 80000 2000 1500 40 35

Computer power & new algorithms All RTCs but X-AO possible with standard methods (Matrix Vector Multiply) New algorithms reducing computing power needed for X-AO Can be retrofitted to the other systems to lower their cost Current portfolio of methods: Method/gain 98x98 250x250 500x500 Precision f(d) Direct sparse Iterative Multi-grid -PCG 1-50 1-30 7-340 4-200 10-1300 15-800 Perfect High k D 2 α D 2 N iter Iterative FD-PCG & Fourier-domain Local & hierarchic 45-230 ~600 250-1250 ~3700 1250-5000 ~15000 High low 2 D log( D k 2 ) PCG: Pre-conditioned Conjugate Gradients 36

Laser Guide Stars enabling Technologies Components being developed: Fiber laser sources (Raman and Sum-frequency [LLNL]) (IPF Technologies, Volius) Photonic Crystal Fiber to relay pulsed lasers (Crystal Fiber AG) 37

System design roadmap Explore actual limit of classical Laser schemes for GLAO, LTAO, MCAO & MOAO systems Study promising novel LGS-AO concepts & field test (FP6, FP7) Science cases instrument & AO designs trade-offs Fully design SCAO with M6 adaptive mirror NGS- LGS design trade-offs for GL-LT-MC-MO AO Pursue AO key technologies roadmap (FP7, OWL Phase B): Large & micro deformable mirrors Visible & NIR WFS detectors Lasers & beam projectors New control algorithms and Real Time Computers Feedback from VLT AO systems & demonstrators Explore fundamental limits of EPICS with HOT 38

Conclusions Several AO concepts studied; performance evaluated LGSs - NGSs trade-off to be explored further Ground Layer & Multi-Conjugate Demonstrators on-track VLT AO Facility & Planet Finder pathfinders for OWL EPICS design study calls for several bread boards (HOT) LGS-ELT demonstrators needed Aggressive roadmap for AO key technologies (OPTICON, FP6) CCD, IR WFSs Large & µ DMs (two competitive M6 feasibility studies; CfT out) Control & algorithms Lasers Strong involvement of the AO community; THANKS.! Active preparation of a FP7 AO R&D program (2007-2014) 33% of the OWL R&D effort for AO 39