Guidance on the anonymisation of clinical reports for the purpose of publication

Similar documents
Guidance on the anonymisation of clinical reports for the purpose of publication in accordance with policy 0070

EMA Technical Anonymisation Group (TAG)

Enpr EMA. Enpr-EMA. European Network of Paediatric Research at the European Medicines Agency

How Paediatric Research Networks can help drug development

EU s Innovative Medical Technology and EMA s Measures

Extension application* assessment timetables

The General Data Protection Regulation and use of health data: challenges for pharmaceutical regulation

Informed consent and multiple application*

Safety Signal - Assessment of responses to Request for Supplementary Information (RSI)

Reflection Paper on synergies between regulatory and HTA issues. DG SANTE Unit B4 Medical products: safety, quality, innovation

Convergence and Differentiation within the Framework of European Scientific and Technical Cooperation on HTA

ENCePP Work Plan

Ethical Governance Framework

The EFPIA Perspective on the GDPR. Brendan Barnes, EFPIA 2 nd Nordic Real World Data Conference , Helsinki

Interaction btw. the GDPR and Clinical Trials Regulation

clarification to bring legal certainty to these issues have been voiced in various position papers and statements.

Justice Select Committee: Inquiry on EU Data Protection Framework Proposals

MA/INS/GMP/735037/2014 Annex 1 of the GMP Guidelines on Good Manufacturing Practice - Manufacture of Sterile Medicinal Products

Workshop on anonymization Berlin, March 19, Basic Knowledge Terms, Definitions and general techniques. Murat Sariyar TMF

ENCePP Work Plan

European Network for Health Technology Assessment (EUnetHTA) Joint Action 3

'INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS FOR RESEARCH IN HEALTHCARE' Developing a novel approach to deliver better precision medicine in Europe The EMA standpoint

Towards a 21 st Century Regulator s role EMA Early Access Toolbox

EMA experience with the review of digital technology proposals in medicine development programmes

Draft Plan of Action Chair's Text Status 3 May 2008

SHTG primary submission process

EMA/EC multi-stakeholder workshop to further improve the implementation of the Paediatric Regulation

Finn Børlum Kristensen, MD, PhD Director, EUnetHTA Secretariat Danish Health and Medicines Authority (EUnetHTA Coordinator) Copenhagen, Denmark

COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT. pursuant to Article 294(6) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

Andalusian Agency for Health Technology Assessment (AETSA)

Ministry of Justice: Call for Evidence on EU Data Protection Proposals

Health Based Exposure Limits (HBEL) and Q&As

25 th Workshop of the EURORDIS Round Table of Companies (ERTC)

DRAFT. Cardiac Safety Research Consortium CSRC. Membership Committee Charter. 12September2018. Table of Contents

Submission of comments on Review of the Variations Guidelines (EC 1234/2008)

EMA-HTA workshop Bringing together stakeholders for early dialogue in medicines development

Overview on Medicines Regulation: regulatory cooperation and harmonization in focus

IAB Europe Guidance THE DEFINITION OF PERSONAL DATA. IAB Europe GDPR Implementation Working Group WHITE PAPER

Global Alliance for Genomics & Health Data Sharing Lexicon

New Approaches to Safety and Risk Management

Getting the evidence: Using research in policy making

BBMRI-ERIC WEBINAR SERIES #2

ABHI Response to the Kennedy short study on Valuing Innovation

Final Minutes of EMA/EUnetHTA meeting

Table Of Content. Stichting Health Action International... 2 Summary... 3 Coordinator, Leader contact and partners... 6 Outputs...

ICH Q12 (Pharmaceutical Product Lifecycle Management): PMDA Perspective

PRIVACY ANALYTICS WHITE PAPER

Data protection and INSPIRE: an uncomfortable combination?

9 October Opportunities to Promote Data Sharing UCL and the YODA Project. Emma White. Associate Director

NCRIS Capability 5.7: Population Health and Clinical Data Linkage

ICC POSITION ON LEGITIMATE INTERESTS

Data Anonymization Related Laws in the US and the EU. CS and Law Project Presentation Jaspal Singh

Mutual Learning Programme Database of National Labour Market Practices. Step-by-Step Guide

(EC) ), 11(8) 347/ /2009, (EC)

FDA Centers of Excellence in Regulatory and Information Sciences

ARTICLE 29 Data Protection Working Party

RADIO SPECTRUM COMMITTEE

Agenda Industry stakeholder platform on research and development support

OMCL Network of the Council of Europe GENERAL DOCUMENT

EN Official Journal of the European Union L 117/176 REGULATION (EU) 2017/746 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL.

E5 Implementation Working Group Questions & Answers (R1) Current version dated June 2, 2006

RADIO SPECTRUM COMMITTEE

Progressive Licensing and the Modernization of the Canadian Regulatory Framework

Software as a Medical Device (SaMD)

Pharmacovigilance System - EU

Documentary Heritage Development Framework. Mark Levene Library and Archives Canada

EU Research Integrity Initiative

Recast de la législation européenne et impact sur l organisation hospitalière

The Evolution of Policy 0070: EMA Clinical Data Publication

13 December A NERA Briefing: Expert Workshop on HTA Workshop Sponsored by Pfizer

Tool for reducing uncertainties in the evidence generation for specialised treatments for rare diseases

Claus Mortensen, Medicines Inspector. Danish Medicines Agency. Member of the EMEA PAT team

Considerations in Conforming Data from Multiple Implantable Medical Devices to CDISC Standards Using SAS Julia Yang, Medtronic plc.

ISO/TR TECHNICAL REPORT. Intelligent transport systems System architecture Privacy aspects in ITS standards and systems

Ethical issues raised by big data and real world evidence projects. Dr Andrew Turner

A review of the role and costs of clinical commissioning groups

Central Cancer Registry Geocoding Needs

An Essential Health and Biomedical R&D Treaty

The HL7 RIM in the Design and Implementation of an Information System for Clinical Investigations on Medical Devices

A Focus on Health Data Infrastructure, Capacity and Application of Outcomes Data

EDQM COUNCIL OF EUROPE CONFERENCE CERTIFICATION PROCEDURE : 20 YEARS OF EXPERIENCE March EDQM, Strasbourg, France ABSTRACTS

Annual report of the Good Manufacturing and Distribution Practice Inspectors Working Group 2017

Technology Needs Assessments under GEF Enabling Activities Top Ups

Council of the European Union Brussels, 15 June 2016 (OR. en)

The General Data Protection Regulation

Topic: Centre Of Excellence Remote Decentralised Clinical Trials

CMC Topics and PMDA s activities Yoshihiro Matsuda, Ph.D.

PROTECT Project. Joanna Groves Chief Executive Officer 27 April 2010 EFPIA Patient Think-Tank Brussels, Belgium

The HL7 RIM in the Design and Implementation of an Information System for Clinical Investigations on Medical Devices

COST FP9 Position Paper

THE ASEAN FRAMEWORK AGREEMENT ON ACCESS TO BIOLOGICAL AND GENETIC RESOURCES

Parenteral Nutrition Down Under Inc. (PNDU) Working with Pharmaceutical Companies Policy (Policy)

Supporting medical technology development with the analytic hierarchy process Hummel, Janna Marchien

The NHS England Assurance Framework: national report for consultation Chief Officer, Barnet Clinical Commissioning Group

ASD EUROSPACE RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY COMMITTEE (SRTC)

Mobilisation and Mutual Learning (MML) Action Plans on Societal Challenges

Robert Bond Partner, Commercial/IP/IT

Supporting Innovation through Regulation and Science

Regulation on medicinal products for paediatric use

SMA Europe Code of Practice on Relationships with the Pharmaceutical Industry

Transcription:

Guidance on the anonymisation of clinical reports for the purpose of publication Stakeholder meeting 6 July 2015, London Presented by Monica Dias Policy Officer An agency of the European Union

Scope and objectives The Agency developed draft guidance to pharmaceutical industry on anonymisation of clinical reports, in the context of phase 1 of the policy; The guidance aims at assisting companies by recommending methodologies and a process that could be applied to clinical reports, for the purpose of achieving adequate anonymisation while retaining a maximum of scientifically useful information on medicinal products for the benefit of the public. 1

Background MAHs/Applicants have the responsibility for submitting clinical reports that have been rendered anonymous for the purpose and use of the clinical reports, i.e. publication under policy 0070 subject to Terms of Use (ToU). The anonymised clinical reports should be a copy of the clinical reports submitted in the context of the scientific evaluation procedure, stripped of sufficient elements such that the participants can no longer be identified. The data in the clinical reports must be processed in such a way that it can no longer be used to identify a natural person by using all the means likely reasonably to be used by either the controller or a third party, as described in Directive 95/46/EC. 2

Legal framework and available standards EU data protection legislation Article 29 Data Protection Working Party opinion of anonymisation techniques (Opinion 05/2014) Information Commissioner s Office (ICO) Code of Practice. Anonymisation: managing data protection risk Sharing clinical trial data: Maximizing benefits, minimizing risk. Institute of Medicine (IOM) Pharmaceutical Users Software Exchange (PhUSE) de-identification standards for CDISC SDTM 3.2 Transcelerate BioPharma Inc., Clinical Study Reports Approach to Protection of Personal Data and Data De-identification and Anonymisation of Individual Patient Data in Clinical Studies A Model Approach 3

Article 29 Working Party Opinion on anonymisation techniques Article 29 Opinion on anonymisation provides two options to establish if a dataset is anonymised: 1. Demonstrate that after anonymisation it is no longer possible to: Singling out: possibility to isolate some records of an individual in the dataset*; Linkability: ability to link, at least, two records concerning the same data subject or a group of data subjects (in the same database or in two different databases); Inference: the possibility to deduce, with significant probability, the value of an attribute from the values of a set of other attributes OR 2. Perform an analysis of re-identification risk. * In the context of phase 1 of policy 0070, dataset are the set of clinical reports published by the Agency 4

Anonymisation techniques Several anonymisation techniques* are available to MAHs/Applicants It is a field of active research and rapidly evolving From the anonymisation techniques described by the Article 29 Working Party, examples of techniques that could be applicable to clinical reports are: Masking Randomisation - noise addition and permutation (data utility limitations) Generalisation - aggregation and k-anonymity *The legislation is not prescriptive about the techniques to be used by data controllers. 5

Anonymisation of direct and quasi identifiers Anonymisation of direct identifiers e.g. patient ID Anonymisation of quasi identifiers (not always necessary to redact all quasi identifiers) Dates individual patient dates can be offset Geographical location - aggregate or generalise from country to region or continent Small populations and rare diseases risk assessment is key to ensure adequate anonymisation 6

EMA recommendation to MAHs/Applicants on how to best achieve anonymisation (1/2) Guidance is not intended to mandate any specific methodology but to highlight to MAHs/Applicants the available techniques and those the EMA considers most relevant in the context of the anonymisation of clinical reports Masking is likely to be used by MAHs/Applicants initially since pharmaceutical companies will have to anonymise their data retrospectively, i.e. after the clinical report has already been written. However, redaction is more likely to decrease the clinical utility of the data compared to other techniques Therefore, randomisation and generalisation techniques are recommended in order to optimise the clinical usefulness of the information published 7

EMA recommendation to MAHs/Applicants on how to best achieve anonymisation (2/2) It is up to a company taking due account of the ultimate purpose and use of the clinical reports (i.e. publication subject to ToU) on the basis of the guidance made available to decide Which option to use (demonstrate that after anonymisation all three criteria are fulfilled - singling out, linkability and inference, or perform a risk assessment) Which anonymisation techniques to use in order to achieve adequate anonymisation while retaining a maximum of scientifically useful information 8

Anonymisation process In order to facilitate the company s approach it is recommended to follow the anonymisation process described below: 1. Determination of direct identifiers and quasi-identifiers 2. Identification of possible adversaries and plausible attacks on the data 3. Data utility considerations 4. Determining the risk of re-identification threshold and evaluation of the actual risk of re-identification 5. Anonymisation methodology 6. Documenting the anonymisation methodology and process 9

Reporting on the anonymisation process Anonymisation report to be submitted to the Agency together with the anonymised clinical reports The report should contain information on: The anonymisation process, including the methodology (techniques used and the rationale for using them), Outcome of the analysis of the risk of re-identification or alternatively confirmation that the three criteria for anonymisation have been fulfilled Report to be published by the Agency together with the anonymised clinical reports 10

Thank you for your attention Further information European Medicines Agency 30 Churchill Place Canary Wharf London E14 5EU United Kingdom Telephone +44 (0)20 3660 6000 Facsimile +44 (0)20 3660 5555 Send a question via our website www.ema.europa.eu/contact Follow us on @EMA_News