Performance Comparison of the Prototype. Reconfigurable Antenna with Commercial LMR. Antennas

Similar documents
A Prototype Simple Reconfigurable Antenna for the. Multiband LMR Antenna System

Measurements of Elements of an LMR Multiband Antenna System Design

Candidate Design for a Multiband LMR Antenna System Using a Rudimentary Antenna Tuner

Description and Laboratory Evaluation of a Prototype LMR Multiband Antenna System

Estimation of Predetection SNR of LMR Analog FM Signals Using PL Tone Analysis

Methodology for Analysis of LMR Antenna Systems

Measurement and Analysis of Multiband Mobile Antennas for Portable Radio Applications

A Prototype Analog Receiver for LWA

MULTIBAND PUBLIC SAFETY RADIO USING A MULTIBAND RFIC WITH AN RF MULTIPLEXER-BASED ANTENNA INTERFACE

Multiband Public Safety Radio using a Multiband RFIC with an RF Multiplexer-based Antenna Interface

EVLA Memo 172 The Modified J-Pole Antenna

A Candidate RF Architecture for a Multiband Public Safety Radio

The Rise of All-Band All-Mode Radio

EVLA Memo 173 Strut-Straddling Arrays for the VLA 4-meter Observing System

On-the-Air Demonstration of a Prototype LWA Analog Signal Path

Interaction Between an Antenna and a Shelter

MFJ-208 VHF SWR Analyzer

Optimum Noise Figure Specification

Assembly Manual. Mobile Communications ANTENNA SYSTEMS LBI ERICSSONZM ERICSSONZM

The Amazing MFJ 269 Author Jack Tiley AD7FO

Basic Transceiver tests with the 8800S

LWA Analog Signal Path Planning

A Covert Tracking System Using the DDF5931

Technician License Course Chapter 3 Types of Radios and Radio Circuits. Module 7

Least understood topics by most HAMs RF Safety Ground Antennas Matching & Feed Lines

INSTALLATION MANUAL TELEVISION DEMODULATOR MODEL S-890-D

MAKING TRANSIENT ANTENNA MEASUREMENTS

MFJ-2389 Compact 8 Band Vertical

Lateral Position Dependence of MIMO Capacity in a Hallway at 2.4 GHz

A High-Resolution Survey of RFI at MHz as Seen By Argus

Users Manual. 200W HF/50MHz Band Auto Antenna Tuner. Model HC-200AT

Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks N

Tracking of Moving Targets with MIMO Radar

Spectral Occupancy at VHF: Implications for Cognitive Radios

Input Return Loss, db > 26 Narrowband to Narrowband Isolation, db > 30

EXPERIMENT EM3 INTRODUCTION TO THE NETWORK ANALYZER

Applications: FM wireless audio, USB PC audio broadcasting, wireless microphones, maternal and child care.

THE EFFECT OF RANGE LENGTH ON THE MEASUREMENT OF TRP

LWA Beamforming Design Concept

EMERGENCY SERVICE ANTENNA MULTIFUNCTION MiMo ANTENNA

TC-2300B DAB/DMB Tester

I Only to be used by a licensed radio amateur I

A Novel UWB Antenna with Multiple Notched Bands for WiMAX and WLAN Applications

VHF WIRELESS MICROPHONE SYSTEM

AN388. Si470X/1X/2X/3X/4X EVALUATION BOARD TEST PROCEDURE. 1. Introduction. Table 1. Product Family Function

Chapter 5 DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION OF SWASTIKA-SHAPED FREQUENCY RECONFIGURABLE ANTENNA ON FR4 SUBSTRATE

Testing a Prototype Blade Antenna at the LWDA Site

EE 3324 Electromagnetics Laboratory

Newcomers and Elmers Net: Scanning with Amateur Radios Robert AK3Q

Technician Licensing Class. Lesson 4. presented by the Arlington Radio Public Service Club Arlington County, Virginia

UNIVERSITY OF TRENTO A QUAD-BAND PATCH ANTENNA FOR GALILEO AND WI-MAX SERVICES. Edoardo Zeni, Renzo Azaro, Paolo Rocca and Andrea Massa.


ID-5100 User Evaluation & Test Report

TC-2300B DAB/DMB Tester

ASPiSYS DQAM AM Stereo Decoder

Technician Licensing Class T9

Class II Permissive Change Report

TC-2300B DAB/DMB Tester

AUTOTUNE USER GUIDE. R8000 Series Communications System Analyzer. Motorola MOTOTRBO Portable Motorola MOTOTRBO Mobile

db = 10 log10 (P1/P2) where P1 and P2 are two power levels

Chapter 6 Antenna Basics. Dipoles, Ground-planes, and Wires Directional Antennas Feed Lines

Welcome to AntennaSelect Volume 34 October UHF and VHF Stacked Antenna Pylons

Transmit Combiners. To view the catalog online or download, go to Aurora Rd. Solon, OH Phone

Welcome to Ham Radio 201 New General / Extra Session

Technician License Course Chapter 2. Lesson Plan Module 3 Modulation and Bandwidth

Selecting the Optimal 700MHz LTE Antenna for Public Safety Communications. By Jerry Posluszny, Director of Engineering, Mobile Mark

Installed Radio Testing with the 3500

Test sites for EMC measurements

LWA Station Design. S. Ellingson, Virginia Tech N. Kassim, U.S. Naval Research Laboratory. URSI General Assembly Chicago Aug 11, 2008 JPL

NXDN Signal and Interference Contour Requirements An Empirical Study

Class Overview. Antenna Fundamentals Repeaters Duplex and Simplex Nets and Frequencies Cool Radio Functions Review

Electronics Design Laboratory Lecture #10. ECEN 2270 Electronics Design Laboratory

DMR Application Note Testing MOTOTRBO Radios On the R8000 Communications System Analyzer

4/25/2012. Supplement T9. 2 Exam Questions, 2 Groups. Amateur Radio Technician Class T9A: T9A: T9A: T9A:

Characterization of medical devices electromagnetic immunity to environmental RF fields.

Application Note: Testing P25 Conventional Radios Using the Freedom Communications System Analyzers

RFID Reader Frontends for a Dual-Frequency (13 MHz and 868 MHz) Rapid Prototyping Environment

William Stallings Data and Computer Communications. Bab 4 Media Transmisi

Cray Valley Radio Society. Real Life Wire Antennas

Code No: R Set No. 1

800 MHz Test Fixture Design

William Stallings Data and Computer Communications 7 th Edition. Chapter 4 Transmission Media

Application Note: DMR Application Note Testing MOTOTRBO Radios On the Freedom Communications System Analyzer

The Stub Loaded Helix: A Reduced Size Helical Antenna

Testing Motorola P25 Conventional Radios Using the R8000 Communications System Analyzer

International journal of Systems and Technologies ISSN

Remote Site Monitoring

IC-R8500 Test Report. By Adam Farson VA7OJ/AB4OJ

Technician License. Course

TY-1440A 400W UHF Analog TV Transmitter Adjacent Channel Exciter (Optional) Technical Specification V3.01

Supplemental Slides: MIMO Testbed Development at the MPRG Lab

Transmission lines. Characteristics Applications Connectors

Ascent Ground and Satellite Demonstration

IC-F7000. Advanced selective call and ALE make HF communication easier than ever!

Welcome to the Symposium, I am [name and title] from Keysight technologies.

Cupertino ARES Training

November 3, Saw Sun Hock, Giorgi Bit-Babik, Ph.D., and Antonio Faraone, Ph.D. Motorola Solutions EME Research Lab, Plantation, Florida

LOW PROFILE ANTENNA MHz NEMO A10AA1441A. Electrical NEMO SI. Mechanical Data

& REACTIVE RCIED JAMMING

SDA-01A USER MANUAL 1. Attention before use 1).Only professional technicians are allowed to do maintainence of the transmitter 2).Please set anti-thun

Transcription:

Performance Comparison of the Prototype Reconfigurable Antenna with Commercial LMR Antennas Mahmud Harun, Akshay Kumar and S.W. Ellingson April 10, 2012 Bradley Dept. of Electrical & Computer Engineering, 444 Durham Hall, Virginia Polytechnic Institute & State University, Blacksburg, VA 24061 USA. E-mail: mharun@vt.edu 1

Contents 1 Introduction 3 2 Comparison of s 11 4 3 Comparison of Audio SNR 8 4 Conclusion 11 2

1 Introduction In [1] a prototype reconfigurable antenna is developed for use in land mobile radio (LMR) antenna systems. In this document, we compare the performance of the reconfigurable antenna with several commercially available LMR antennas in the VHF High (138-174 MHz), UHF (406 512 MHz) and 800 MHz (764 862 MHz) bands. At one selected frequency in each of the three bands, the performance of the reconfigurable antenna is compared with commercial antennas developed for that particular band. The commercial antennas considered in this report are from Laird Technologies 1 ; the antenna with model number C150/450C is designed for the frequency ranges of 150 174 MHz and 450 474 MHz, and the antenna with model number B8065C is designed for the range of 806 896 MHz. Two different metrics are used to compare the performance of the antennas from a system perspective. They are: 1) transmit VSWR, and 2) receiver sensitivity. The transmit VSWR is evaluated by measuring s 11 at the antenna terminals upon a 50 Ω termination (a smaller s 11 implies a lower VSWR). A lower VSWR is desired to protect the transmitter from damage. We assume VSWR < 3 to be a sufficient condition. The receiver sensitivity is quantified in terms of the post-detection SNR (signal to noise ratio), i.e., the audio SNR achieved with the antennas. It is observed that the reconfigurable antenna along with a tuner (described in [2]) is comparable to commercial LMR antennas with respect to transmit VSWR. The detailed comparison of VSWR is reported in Section 2. Moreover, the reconfigurable antenna offers comparable sensitivity to the commercial antennas. The detailed comparison of sensitivity is described in Section 3. 1 http://www.lairdtech.com/ 3

2 Comparison of s 11 In this section, we compare s 11 of the reconfigurable antenna with the C150/450C and B8065C antenna upon a 50 Ω termination. The frequencies selected for comparison are: 1) 155.535 MHz (Virginia Tech Police), 2) 453.625 MHz (Blacksburg Transit fixed route buses), and 3) 851.150 MHz (Blacksburg Police). The frequencies are selected based on the availability of on-the-air signal. As described in [1], the relay of the reconfigurable antenna is in the switched off -mode for use in the UHF and 800 MHz band, and in the switched on -mode for the VHF High band. The s 11 of the reconfigurable antenna in the relay switched off mode is shown in Figure 1. Also shown in the figure is the s 11 measured for the C150/450C and the B8065C antenna. It is observed that at 851.535 MHz the s 11 of the reconfigurable antenna is 7 db which is much larger than the s 11 of 15 db observed with the B8065C antenna. However, a s 11 value of 7 db, i.e., a VSWR of 2.6 meets the requirement of VSWR < 3. It is also observed from Figure 1 that at 453.625 MHz the s 11 for the reconfigurable antenna is about 4 db, which is larger than the s 11 of 8 db of the C150/450C antenna. In order to improve the s 11, the reconfigurable antenna is tuned using the tuner described in [2]. We experimented with several stub lengths at several distances from the antenna terminal. The antenna is connected to the tuner using a 97 cm long cable, as might be required for a trunk mounted antenna to connect to a tuner located in the trunk. From our experiment a 33.4 cm long open stub connected parallel to the line at a distance of 1.05 m from the antenna terminal is eventually selected. This corresponds to the 8th switching position in the tuner (see [2]), with the 1st switching position being the position closest to the antenna (shown in Figure 2). The results of s 11 measurement are shown in Figure 3. The measured s 11 for the C150/450C antenna is also shown for comparison. It is observed that the tuned reconfigurable antenna exhibits a s 11 value of 18 db at 453.625 MHz corresponding to an improvement of 14 db from the un tuned antenna. Also, the performance of the tuned antenna is better than the C150/450C antenna in the range 445 457 MHz and 484-520 MHz. 4

0 2 4 6 s 11 (db) 8 10 12 VSWR=3 14 16 18 20 Recon. open C150/450C B8065C 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 Freq (MHz) Figure 1: Comparison of s 11 of the reconfigurable antenna in the relay switched off mode with the C150/450C and the B8065C antenna. Note that the solid brown line indicates s 11 corresponding to VSWR=3; s 11 below this line is associated with VSWR < 3. 5

Figure 2: Open stub connected in parallel to improve s11 of the reconfigurable antenna around 455 MHz. 6

0 2 Tuned Reconfigurable Antenna C150/450C Antenna 4 6 s 11 (db) 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 400 420 440 460 480 500 520 Freq (MHz) Figure 3: Comparison of s 11 of the tuned reconfigurable antenna with the C150/450C antenna. 7

The antenna tuner described in [2] proposed a closed loop for controlling the stub matching based on the monitored VSWR. However, for the results presented in this report, we didn t use the closed loop. Our objective in this report is to investigate the usefulness of tuning, and any stub matching that is observed to improve performance can easily be incorporated with the closed loop antenna tuner in the final design. The s 11 of the reconfigurable antenna in the relay switched on mode is shown in Figure 4. Also shown in the figure is the s 11 measured for the C150/450C antenna. It is observed that at 155.535 MHz, the C150/450C antenna shows a s 11 value of 11 db; whereas the reconfigurable antenna shows a s 11 values of 8 db, which is again small enough to protect the transmitter from damage. Thus, the reconfigurable antenna along with the tuner (if required) is comparable to commercial LMR antennas from a transmit VSWR perspective. The next section investigates the performance from a sensitivity perspective. 3 Comparison of Audio SNR In this section we report the comparison of performance of the reconfigurable antenna with the C150/450C and B8065C antenna in terms of the corresponding audio SNR. The experimental setup for capturing the audio signal is shown in Figure 5. First, the reconfigurable antenna and the B8065C antenna are simultaneously mounted above a ground plane (constructed of 3 aluminium panels as described in [1]) as shown in Figure 5. The reconfigurable antenna is in the relay switched off mode in this case. Each of the antennas is connected to an Icom receiver which communicates with a laptop. Software provided by the vendor of Icom receiver runs on the laptop to record the audio signals. The receivers are tuned at 851.150 MHz and the on-the-air signals from Blacksburg Police are recorded. The recorded audio signals are analyzed using the parametric estimation and subtraction (PE/S) method as described in [3], and the audio SNR is computed. The results are shown in Table 1. It is 8

0 2 4 6 s 11 (db) 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 Reconfig. short C150/450C 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 Freq (MHz) Figure 4: Comparison of s 11 of the reconfigurable antenna in the relay switched on mode with the C150/450C antenna. 9

Figure 5: Experimental setup of the reconfigurable antenna and the commercial antenna being simultaneously mounted above the ground plane in order to capture on the air signals. 10

observed that the audio SNR for the two antennas are comparable. For the next set of measurements the B8065C antenna is replaced by the C150/450C antenna, and the reconfigurable antenna is tuned using the stub as described in the previous section. The receivers are then tuned at 453.625 MHz, and the audio signals are recorded. The results of audio SNR calculation are shown in Table 1. It is observed that the audio SNR with the tuned reconfigurable antenna is comparable to the C150/450C antenna. For the last set of measurements, the reconfigurable antenna is set in the relay switched on mode and the receivers are tuned at 155.535 MHz. The audio signals are recorded, and the audio SNRs are analyzed. The results are again shown in Table 1. It is observed that the audio SNRs are comparable. Therefore, at all the three frequencies the reconfigurable antenna offers comparable sensitivity to commercially available antennas. 4 Conclusion The performance of the prototype reconfigurable antenna is compared with the Laird Technology s C150/450C and B8065C antenna in terms of s 11 and audio SNR. It is observed that the reconfigurable antenna can be tuned to perform as good as or even better than the C150/450C antenna in the UHF band. As mentioned, the tuning can be automatically performed using a closed loop antenna tuner already developed for this application. Also, the antenna in the relay switched off mode has comparable performance to the B8065C antenna at 851.150 MHz; and in the relay switched on mode the performance at 155.535 MHz is comparable to the C150/450C antenna. Therefore, the single reconfigurable antenna of [1] (and [2]) along with a tuner (described in [2]) performs comparably to the band specific antennas, as are currently used in LMR antenna systems. 11

Freq. Reconfig. Antenna Commercial Antenna Audio SNR Audio SNR 851.150 MHz Relay Switched Off B8065C 22.9 db 23.0 db 453.625 MHz Relay Switched Off, Antenna Tuned C150/450C 24.9 db 24.8 db 155.535 MHz Relay Switched On C150/450C 21.6 db 21.9 db Table 1: Comparison of audio SNR. 12

References [1] M. Harun, S. W. Ellingson, A Prototype Simple Reconfigurable Antenna for the Multiband LMR Antenna System, Project Report, Virginia Polytechnic Inst. & State U., April 4, 2012. [2] S. Ellingson, Phase II Design for a Multiband LMR Antenna System, Project Report No. 18, Virginia Polytechnic Inst. & State U., August 30, 2011. [online] http://www.ece.vt.edu/swe/asmr/. [3] A. Kumar, S.W. Ellingson, Characterization of LMR Analog FM Audio Quality Using PL Tone Analysis, Project Report No. 15, Virginia Polytechnic Inst. & State U., July 25, 2011. [online] http://www.ece.vt.edu/swe/asmr/. 13