Expanding the Frontiers of Geotechnical Engineering

Similar documents
Should We Upgrade to Phase 2 6.0?

Module 10 : Improvement of rock mass responses. Content

Reinforcement with Soil Nails

NALYSIS OF STABILIZING SLOPES USING VERTICAL PILES

Modelling of Rebar and Cable Bolt Behaviour in Tension/Shear

Practices and Challenges. For Open Pit Geotechnical Characterization, Design and Execution

INFLUENCE OF PILES ON LOAD- SETTLEMENT BEHAVIOUR OF RAFT FOUNDATION

optimisation of pre-cast support beams

MASE 321 Lab. RISA 3D Introduction. Global Parameters. Click the button to start drawing members.

Journal of American Science 2015;11(8) Soil Nailing For Radial Reinforcement of NATM Tunnels

The effect of underground cavities on design seismic ground motion

GEO-SLOPE International Ltd, Calgary, Alberta, Canada Relief Well Spacing

IDEA CSS 7 General cross-section

HACETTEPE UNIVERSITY MINING ENGINEERIN DEPARTMENT

Predicting the temperature and strength development within cemented paste backfill structures

Analysis of a Nailed Soil Slope Using Limit Equilibrium and Finite Element Methods

Ground Improvement Prof. G. L. Sivakumar Babu Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore. Lecture No.

ANALYSIS OF LATERAL STIFFNESS FOR INFILLED FRAME WITH OPENING

Optimum Design of Nailed Soil Wall

CONSIDERATIONS IN THE OPTIMISATION OF BENCH FACE ANGLE AND BERM WIDTH GEOMETRIES FOR OPEN PIT MINES

For more information on how you can download and purchase Clickteam Fusion 2.5, check out the website

Numerical Modeling of Grouted Soil Nails

A study of Vibration Analysis for Gearbox Casing Using Finite Element Analysis

Support Tutorial. Project Settings. Adding Bolts. Select: File New. Select: Analysis Project Settings. Select: Support Add Bolt

Study on embedded length of piles for slope reinforced with one row of piles

Corporate Subscription. NAFEMS reference library at the click of a button

Finite Element Study of Using Concrete Tie Beams to Reduce Differential Settlement Between Footings

Lawrence A. Soltis, M. and Robert J. Ross, M. 1

BE4E PLPAK Towards more realistic structural modeling

Seismic Response of Cellwise Braced Reinforced Concrete Frames

Abaqus Beam Tutorial (ver. 6.12)

Key Techniques of Expert System for Rock Bolting in Coal Mine Roadways

WREF 2012: ADVANCED PARABOLIC CONCENTRATOR FOR GRID COMPETITIVENESS

IDEA Connection 8. User guide. IDEA Connection user guide

ECON 312: Games and Strategy 1. Industrial Organization Games and Strategy

GPR SURVEY METHOD. Ground probing radar

Advancement simulation of parallel tunnels and their interchange with two other subway lines using a new FEM approach, a case study

Secondary Consolidation (Creep)

Learning Guide. ASR Automated Systems Research Inc. # Douglas Crescent, Langley, BC. V3A 4B6. Fax:

Prying of a Large Span Base Plate Undergoing a Moment Load Applied by a Round Pier

Experimental investigation of crack in aluminum cantilever beam using vibration monitoring technique

ECO 220 Game Theory. Objectives. Agenda. Simultaneous Move Games. Be able to structure a game in normal form Be able to identify a Nash equilibrium

Advance Steel. Tutorial

Lecture 8: Introduction to Hybrid FEM IE

Advance Concrete. Tutorial

FENCE INSTALLATION GUIDE 8 HIGH WALLS

PTC Technical Specialists E-Newsletter Date: April 1, 2006

AutoCAD Inventor - Solid Modeling, Stress and Dynamic Analysis

IDEA Connections. User guide

In-line eddy current testing of wire rod

Effect of crack depth of Rotating stepped Shaft on Dynamic. Behaviour

Solution of Pipeline Vibration Problems By New Field-Measurement Technique

TANGENTIAL STRESS FACTOR COMPUTATION IN POINT MOUNTED STRUCTURAL GLASS

B422 - PRECAST REINFORCED CONCRETE BOX CULVERTS AND BOX SEWERS - OPSS 422

AN INNOVATIVE FEA METHODOLOGY FOR MODELING FASTENERS

Applied Precast Concrete Detailing

Modeling Multi-Bolted Systems

SIMULATION AND EXPERIMENTAL WORK OF SINGLE LAP BOLTED JOINT TESTED IN BENDING

The Behaviour Of Round Timber Sections Notched Over The Support On The Tension Face. Justin Dewey

Mesh density options. Rigidity mode options. Transform expansion. Pin depth options. Set pin rotation. Remove all pins button.

Digital Land Surveying and Mapping (DLS and M) Dr. Jayanta Kumar Ghosh Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Roorkee

A New Type of Very High Reliability Torsion IDC Which Can Accept A Large Range of Wire Gauges

Determining Dimensional Capabilities From Short-Run Sample Casting Inspection

Best practices in product development: Design Studies & Trade-Off Analyses

Unlimited work preparation of beams & bars

Hydraulic Tensioner Assembly: Load Loss Factors and Target Stress Limits

Real time monitoring method for the longitudinal settlement of shield tunnel using wireless inclinometer YIN Jianguo1, a *, HUANG Hongwei1,b

Double Shear Testing of Bolts

StereoSTATIKA. Main Features:

Autodesk University Precast Building Design Using Revit, Robot Structural Analysis, and Dynamo

Nonlinear behavior of Reinforced Concrete Infilled Frames using ATENA 2D

Abaqus/CAE (ver. 6.14*) Plate/Shell Tutorial

Monopile as Part of Aeroelastic Wind Turbine Simulation Code

Release Notes - Fixes in Tekla Structures 2016i PR1

Getting the Best Performance from Challenging Control Loops

Development of Stochastic Methods for Helicopter Crash Simulation

Drilling solutions for Construction,Mining and Quarrying Industy

Introduction to Game Theory

CHAPTER 5 FAULT DIAGNOSIS OF ROTATING SHAFT WITH SHAFT MISALIGNMENT

Integrated Forming Simulations and Die Structural Analysis for Optimal Die Designs

Scratch Coding And Geometry

The Air Bearing Throughput Edge By Kevin McCarthy, Chief Technology Officer

FEKO-Based Method for Electromagnetic Simulation of Carcass Wires Embedded in Vehicle Tires

Proposal. Analysis of Parallel Vibration Paths with Potential Application to Vehicle Noise. Reduction. Submitted to. The Engineering Honors Committee

Autodesk Advance Steel. Drawing Style Manager s guide

Relationship to theory: This activity involves the motion of bodies under constant velocity.

EFFECT OF SETBACK RATIO ON SEISMIC PERFORMANCE OF RC STRUCTURES

midas Dshop (Basic Tutorial) Basic Tutorial Reinforced Concrete Structure - 1 -

Module 2 WAVE PROPAGATION (Lectures 7 to 9)

Dynamic Analysis of Infills on R.C Framed Structures

Skewed connections result when members frame to each

Settlement Analysis of Piled Raft System in Soft Stratified Soils

Advance Steel. Drawing Style Manager s guide

Experimental Investigation of Crack Detection in Cantilever Beam Using Natural Frequency as Basic Criterion

FENCE INSTALLATION GUIDE 6 HIGH FENCE

DESIGN AND MODELLING OF ORPHAN HOME

Ground motion and structural vibration reduction using periodic wave bamer as a passive isolation

Numerical investigation of soil nail wall during construction

IMPROVED AGC CONTROL IN COLD ROLLING USING LEARNING TECHNOLOGY. Gunnar BENGTSSON First Control Systems AB, Ängsgärdg. 4, S Västerås, Sweden

Drilling and Blasting Technology Prof. Kaushik Dey Department of Mining Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur

Transcription:

Expanding the Frontiers of Geotechnical Engineering Software development is not an exact science. When a new version of a Rocscience program is being planned, what are the decisions that have to be made by the developers and where do the ideas come from? You may be surprised to read how much influence our users have had in the recent software development process of this new version, Phase 2 7.0. Geomechanics software used worldwide by geotechnical engineers software tools for rock and soil Article prepared for RocNews Fall 2008

Phase 2 7.0: Expanding the Frontiers of Geotechnical Engineering Instead of working harder, work smarter. Quote from Microsoft ad It was September 2007, in the boardroom of Rocscience s Toronto office, and an intense debate was is progress. No one wanted to leave the room; outside distractions had been banished; important decisions had to be made in order to map out the final Phase 2 7.0 development plan. Under discussion was nothing but software: the next generation of finite element modelling tools for geotechnical engineering. The Rocscience team, huddled around the boardroom table, was poring over suggestions and requests from many users, and proposals from team members. Some of these documents stemmed from meetings with clients from as far away as Australia and South Africa. They all described proposed ideas for the tools needed to make Phase 2, the Rocscience flagship product for finite element modelling, even more useful for geotechnical engineering practice. 2

No one knew just what would be best to implement out of the multitude of suggestions and ideas. Some estimated that adding automatic joint network generation should be tackled first. Some felt improving computational speed was paramount. Others thought perhaps enhancing support modelling capabilities was best. As discussions progressed the team realized it was tough: so many choices to make, yet resources were not infinite. It felt as if we were settlers at the frontiers of geotechnical civilization, deciding on how to advance into uncharted territory with only what we had, recalls Brent Corkum, software manager, who guided the discussions. That day the team committed to four major groups of additions for version 7 of Phase2 enabling automatic generation and modelling of large networks of discrete fractures, substantially improving support design functionalities, speeding up computations anywhere from 25% to 50%, and enhancing model building capabilities. All 70 testers of the beta version of Phase2 7.0, who have reported back, have expressed great pleasure with the new version. They believe the program has hit its mark. But our attempt to create a cutting-edge geotechnical engineering software tool could have turned out differently. Your efforts in regularly letting us know what was required to make finite element modelling most practical to everyday engineering paid off. The rest of this article briefly describes the rationale behind the major enhancements made to Phase2. Phase 2 7.0 Beta Testing Program had the highest user participation so far. 3

Automatic Generation of Discrete Fracture Networks In blocky rock masses, discontinuities such as joints, bedding planes, faults and foliations can dominate behaviour and cause radical departures from predictions based on continuum analysis. Adequate description of the size and locations of joints is difficult, mostly because of their three-dimensional nature and partial exposure in outcrops or excavations. It is however understood that their dissemination throughout a domain can be approximated with statistical distributions. As a result, Phase2 7.0 comes with tools for automatically generating networks of joints that are consistent with some statistical model. The automatic joint network generator allows users to very easily ungroup the joints in a network. It also has tools for changing the end-conditions of any number of these joints, and has the intelligence to specify locations at which joints intersect with free surfaces (such as the ground surface or excavations) as open joint ends. The new automatic joint generation tool enables Phase2 to Discrete joint networks can now be easily generated 4

model problems that previously would have been analyzed only with discrete element approaches. By generating new instances of randomly distributed joints with just a mouse click, the generator enables engineers to examine ranges of possible failure mechanisms and behaviour, which can occur in a rock mass. This feature paves the way for robust designs that can accommodate deviations from expected behaviour. It also provides guidance on risks associated with a design. Improved Support Modelling The support elements liners, reinforcement members, etc. for subsurface and underground structures interact with surrounding ground. This interaction forces support design to be iterative. The process may go like this: specify a particular support, check to see whether it helps an excavation meet design requirements; if it does not then change its dimensions, stiffness, size, etc. If it does then maybe it is too conservative and therefore try a less conservative design. Support-ground interactions also mean that the design of support for structures such as tunnels cannot be left to the structural engineer alone. To facilitate improved design of support, Phase2 7.0 comes with a number of important new features, including: Reinforced concrete liner this new liner type simplifies the task of modeling twocomponent liner systems such as reinforced concrete, or the combination of steel sets and shotcrete. Phase2 uses the input properties specified for the concrete and steel reinforcement to calculate a homogeneous cross-section of equivalent properties. Reinforced concrete liner properties 5

Comprehensive library of steel sections for reinforced concrete liners the sections in the library range from standard rebar and I-beams to wire meshes widely available in Europe and North America. Phase2 7.0 also allows users to create customized libraries with additional reinforcement types. Support capacity envelopes for reinforced liners Phase2 plots two types of strength envelope, a moment-thrust envelope and a shear forcethrust envelope, for defined reinforcement and concrete Reinforcement database Support capacity envelopes for liner on circular tunnel 6

sections. Each strength envelope plot is based on the properties of the support components and a userspecified factor of safety. Also shown on each plot are points that indicate the actual moments, thrust and shear forces calculated at various locations along the reinforced liners of interest. Points falling outside an envelope indicate failure or unsatisfactory performance. Explicit modelling of jointbolt interactions in the real world, whenever a bolt crosses a joint and the joint slips or opens, forces develop in the bolt to resist the movements. In the new version of Phase2, this important behaviour is explicitly captured and leads to more realistic results. Computational Speedup Incorporation of Fast Intel Solver Routines Phase2 7.0 enables users to make the most of their time by speeding up calculations by as much 1-1/2 times (compared to previous program versions). As well, the new program can compute models with much larger degrees of freedom and numbers of elements. In one test case, Phase2 performed a shear strength reduction (SSR) stability analysis (consisting of 11 separate model runs) of a jointed rock slope with 69,000 six-noded elements and 310,000 degrees of freedom in 8-1/2 hours! Of also great importance is the fact that version 7 is less affected by the presence of elements with poor aspect ratios. These enhancements were accomplished through incorporation of Intel s library of matrix solver routines. Enhanced Model-Development Capabilities Quite often, geotechnical engineers, especially at feasibility stages, do not have adequate information on the properties of rock masses and soils. As a result, reasonable first estimates of input properties are of great benefit. Phase2 7.0 can directly access RocLab and RocData (Rocscience programs for determining or estimating the parameters of linear and non-linear strength envelopes for rock and soil). It can then import strength and deformation data from these programs directly into a finite element model. This feature enables engineers to make better use of the database of intact rock properties from over 700 credible, published test records included in RocData. Calculation times have decreased by up to 1-1/2 times, with the ability to handle much larger files. 7

Easily import material properties from RocData to Phase 2 Alternatively, you can use the GSI parameter calculator dialog built into Phase2, to assist with determination of parameters for the Generalized Hoek-Brown criterion. GSI parameter calculator for Generalized Hoek-Brown criterion 8

To reduce the amount of user effort spent on creating Slide (Rocscience s conventional limit equilibrium slope stability program) equivalents of Phase2 SSR slope models, version 7 has a one-click option for generating Slide files. The version also includes enhancements such as the ability to: Specify an SSR search area of arbitrary polygonal shape Shrink or expand an external boundary Change the overall slope angle Insert stages into an existing model or delete stages from it Define staged pore pressure grids Save results for stages which have been completely analyzed, if a user chooses to abort a computation Indicate the directions of slip of opposing joint surfaces Display a property table for all soil and rock materials to enhance screen captures and reports Concluding Remarks In this article, we have seen how user input played a defining role in determining new features for Phase2 7.0. We have briefly covered a few of the major features in this version. Using their own practical problems as test cases, 70 beta testers have thoroughly evaluated the program and verified its enhanced capabilities. They experienced how Phase2 can help expand the frontiers of geotechnical design and analysis. Now that the final version has been released, would you consider downloading your trial version today and exploring things for yourself? 9