AN-DPP-003 Rev A2: Using the DP5 with HPGe USING THE DP5 WITH GERMANIUM DETECTORS

Similar documents
Amptek Silicon Drift Diode (SDD) at High Count Rates

Amptek Inc. Page 1 of 7

Summary. Introduction

nanomca 80 MHz HIGH PERFORMANCE, LOW POWER DIGITAL MCA Model Numbers: NM0530 and NM0530Z

nanomca datasheet I. FEATURES

PX4 Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Keyser, Ronald M., Twomey, Timothy R., and Bingham, Russell D. ORTEC, 801 South Illinois Avenue, Oak Ridge, TN 37831s

nanodpp datasheet I. FEATURES

nanomca-sp datasheet I. FEATURES

CAEN Tools for Discovery

nanomca-ii-sp datasheet

TB-5 User Manual. Products for Your Imagination

DSA-LX. Digital Signal Analyzer. Radiation Safety. Amplified.

ORTEC. Research Applications. Pulse-Height, Charge, or Energy Spectroscopy. Detectors. Processing Electronics

PX5 User Manual and Operating Instructions

Design and performance of the X-123 compact X-ray and Gamma-ray spectroscopy system

GAMMA-RAD5 User Manual

XRF Instrumentation. Introduction to spectrometer

Gamma Ray Spectroscopy with NaI(Tl) and HPGe Detectors

ORTEC. High-Count-Rate Spectroscopy with Ge Detectors: Quantitative Evaluation of the Performance of High-Rate Systems 1. I.

M. K. Schultz, R. M. Keyser, R. C. Trammell, and D. L. Upp

AMPTEK INC. 14 DeAngelo Drive, Bedford MA U.S.A FAX:

DP5 User Manual and Operating Instructions

A digital method for separation and reconstruction of pile-up events in germanium detectors. Abstract

Real Time Pulse Pile-up Recovery in a High Throughput Digital Pulse Processor

Comparisons of the Portable Digital Spectrometer Systems

Amptek sets the New State-of-the-Art... Again! with Cooled FET

K 223 Angular Correlation

TROUBLESHOOTING GUIDE FOR AMPTEK DIGITAL PULSE PROCESORS

Comparisons Between Digital Gamma-Ray Spectrometer (DSPec) and Standard Nuclear Instrumentation Methods (NIM) Systems

A MONTE CARLO CODE FOR SIMULATION OF PULSE PILE-UP SPECTRAL DISTORTION IN PULSE-HEIGHT MEASUREMENT

CC2 Charge Sensitive Preamplifier: Experimental Results and Ongoing Development

Chapter 6 Pulse Processing


Lynx Digital Signal Analyzer

Electronic Instrumentation for Radiation Detection Systems

Digital Signal Processing for HPGe Detectors

ORTEC Experiment 13. Gamma-Gamma Coincidence with Angular Correlation. Equipment Required

SPECTROMETRIC CHARACTERISTIC IMPROVEMENT OF CdTe DETECTORS*

CDTE and CdZnTe detector arrays have been recently

INDEX. Firmware for DPP (Digital Pulse Processing) DPP-PSD Digital Pulse Processing for Pulse Shape Discrimination

Simulation of Algorithms for Pulse Timing in FPGAs

Traditional analog QDC chain and Digital Pulse Processing [1]

Gamma Spectrometer Initial Project Proposal

ARTICLE IN PRESS. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research A

Physics Laboratory Scattering of Photons from Electrons: Compton Scattering

ORTEC Experiment 3. Gamma-Ray Spectroscopy Using NaI(Tl) Equipment Required. Purpose. Gamma Emission

Final Results from the APV25 Production Wafer Testing

SUMMARY/DIALOGUE 2 PRESHAPE PIXEL OVERVIEW 3 BRIEF OPERATING INSTRUCTIONS 3 PRESHAPE PIXEL SIMULATION: EXAMPLE OPERATION 4 PRESHAPE PIXEL SIMULATION:

COMPARISON OF A DIGITAL AND AN ANALOGICAL GAMMA SPECTROMETER AT LOW COUNT RATES

Model 673 Spectroscopy Amplifier and Gated Integrator Operating and Service Manual

Real-Time Digital Signal Processors with radiation detectors produced by TechnoAP

ORTEC. AN34 Experiment 14 Nuclear Lifetimes and the Coincidence Method. Equipment Needed from ORTEC. Equipment Required from Other Manufacturers

Bipolar Pulsed Reset for AC Coupled Charge-Sensitive Preamplifiers

Charge Sensitive Preamplifiers (CSP) for the MINIBALL Array of Detectors

GAMMA-GAMMA CORRELATION Latest Revision: August 21, 2007

NIM. ADCs (Peak Sensing) Analog Pulse Processors Amplifiers (Fast) Amplifiers (Spectroscopy) Attenuators Coincidence/Logic/Trigger Units

Analysis and performance Evaluation of trapezoidal filter in pulse shaping

Author(s) Osamu; Nakamura, Tatsuya; Katagiri,

A Prototype Amplifier-Discriminator Chip for the GLAST Silicon-Strip Tracker

Preliminary simulation study of the front-end electronics for the central detector PMTs

NIM INDEX. Attenuators. ADCs (Peak Sensing) Discriminators. Translators Analog Pulse Processors Amplifiers (Fast) Amplifiers (Spectroscopy)

Readout Electronics. P. Fischer, Heidelberg University. Silicon Detectors - Readout Electronics P. Fischer, ziti, Uni Heidelberg, page 1

Purpose This experiment will use the coincidence method for time correlation to measure the lifetime in the decay scheme of 57

Photon Counters SR430 5 ns multichannel scaler/averager

USE of High-Purity Germanium (HPGe) detectors is foreseen

Energy Measurements with a Si Surface Barrier Detector and a 5.5-MeV 241 Am α Source

Analysis of 1=f Noise in CMOS Preamplifier With CDS Circuit

Quad Analog-to-Digital Converter Technical Documentation

A NOVEL FPGA-BASED DIGITAL APPROACH TO NEUTRON/ -RAY PULSE ACQUISITION AND DISCRIMINATION IN SCINTILLATORS

Dual 500ns ADC User Manual

Simulation of Charge Sensitive Preamplifier using Multisim Software

Silicon Drift Detector. with On- Chip Ele ctronics for X-Ray Spectroscopy. KETEK GmbH Am Isarbach 30 D O berschleißheim GERMANY

Digital Dual Mixer Time Difference for Sub-Nanosecond Time Synchronization in Ethernet

Silicon Photomultiplier Evaluation Kit. Quick Start Guide. Eval Kit SiPM. KETEK GmbH. Hofer Str Munich Germany.

Removing Dead Time Variations Due to Detector Pulse Width in Ion Counting Systems

Comparisons of the DSPEC and DSPEC Plus Spectrometer Systems

Chapter 2 Signal Conditioning, Propagation, and Conversion

AD8232 EVALUATION BOARD DOCUMENTATION

Journal of Radiation Protection and Research

Analog-to-Digital-Converter User Manual

SC5307A/SC5308A 100 khz to 6 GHz RF Downconverter. Datasheet SignalCore, Inc.

Evaluating the Performance of a Commercial Silicon Drift Detector for X-ray Microanalysis

A high energy gamma camera using a multiple hole collimator

Today s Outline - January 25, C. Segre (IIT) PHYS Spring 2018 January 25, / 26

Chemistry 985. Some constants: q e 1.602x10 19 Coul, ɛ x10 12 F/m h 6.626x10 34 J-s, c m/s, 1 atm = 760 Torr = 101,325 Pa

Simultaneous Ballistic Deficit Immunity and Resilience to Parallel Noise Sources: A New Pulse Shaping Technique 1

A PC104 Multiprocessor DSP System for Radiation Spectroscopy Applications

New Technique Accurately Measures Low-Frequency Distortion To <-130 dbc Levels by Xavier Ramus, Applications Engineer, Texas Instruments Incorporated

Laser Diode Characterization and Its Challenges

Figure 1: Schematic diagram of Analog Pulse Processing Architecture. Figure 2: Schematic diagram of Digital Pulse Processing (DPP) Architecture

Week 11: Chap. 16b Pulse Shaping

SPECTROMETRIC DETECTION PROBE Model 310. Operator's manual

Using Frequency Diversity to Improve Measurement Speed Roger Dygert MI Technologies, 1125 Satellite Blvd., Suite 100 Suwanee, GA 30024

Stand Alone RF Power Capabilities Of The DEIC420 MOSFET Driver IC at 3.6, 7, 10, and 14 MHZ.

Testing of the NSC Electronics Module with the GSI Clover Detector

9 Feedback and Control

The 2017 IEEE NSS-MIC. Industrial Presentation

SPEAR BTS Toroid Calibration

COMPTON SCATTERING. Purpose. Introduction. Fundamentals of Experiment

Transcription:

Normalized Counts USING THE DP5 WITH GERMNIUM DETECTORS N-DPP-3 Rev : Using the DP5 with HPGe The DP5 is a high performance digital pulse processor which can be used with high purity germanium (HPGe) gamma-ray detectors. Figure 1 shows spectra which were obtained using an HPGe detector and a DP5 digital pulse processor [ 1 ]. Quantitatively, we found better resolution and higher throughput using the DP5 than an analog solution (a Canberra 5 spectroscopy amplifier with an mptek MC8). The DP5 is far more compact, has much greater configurability, and supports modern networking (Ethernet and USB interfaces). In this application note, we will first show the advantages that we observed with the DP5 system and then will discuss how the DP5 should be configured to obtain the best performance. 1.E+ 1.E+1 1.E+ UO3 Lantern Mantle Background Counts/sec 1.E-1 1.E- 1.E-3 1.E-4 5 1, 1,5,,5 Energy (kev) Figure 1. Spectra of low intensity material obtained with an HPGe detector and a DP5 signal processor. 5.E+4 4.E+4 6Co Co 137Cs Cs 133Ba Ba Na Na 3.E+4.E+4 1.E+4.E+ 4 6 8 1 1 14 16 Energy (kev) Figure. Spectra of laboratory radioisotopes obtained with an HPGe detector and a DP5 signal processor. Figure 1 and Figure show spectra measured with an HPGe detector and a DP5 signal processor. Figure 1 shows spectra of low intensity materials:.5 kg of UO 3 at a distance of 1 cm, a lantern mantle containing 1 The data taken in this application notes were taken using a coaxial HPGe detector from Canberra, a reverse electrode diode with dimensions of about 4 cm (dia) x 4 cm, cooled to liquid nitrogen temperatures. It included an internal preamplifier with a 5 s time constant and a gain of 5 mv/mev. The analog shaping amplifier was a Canberra 5 spectroscopy amplifier, using quasi-triangular shaping, and an mptek MC8 multichannel analyzer. Page 1 of 8

thorium, and the laboratory background. Figure shows spectra measured from common laboratory radioisotopes. These figures show the capabilities of an HPGe detector with a DP5. DVNTGES OF DIGITL PROCESSING Digital pulse processing has intrinsic advantages over analog processing, which are discussed in detail elsewhere [, 3 ]. For a comparable pulse width, the digital pulse shape should theoretically simultaneously improve electronic noise, reduce ballistic deficit, permit higher throughput, and reduce pile-up. The digital pulse processor (DPP) reduces electronic noise because the truly trapezoidal shape in a DPP is closer to the theoretically ideal shape than can be achieved with conventional analog filters. The table below shows the noise indices for several shapers for the same pulse width (defined as the FWHM). Series Noise Semi- Gaussian.5 nalog Triangle. Digital Trapezoid. Parallel Noise T FW T 3 FW T FW 7 T 8 FW T T FW T 3 P F The flat top in the DPP trapezoid should theoretically eliminate ballistic deficit, which is commonly seen in coaxial HPGe detectors due to variation in risetime with the long charge collection time. The top of the digital pulse is truly flat and can be adjusted independently of peaking time. When the flat top is longer than the maximum charge collection time in the detector, ballistic deficit is eliminated. The finite duration of the pulse, and the absence of an exponential tail, should theoretically lead to improved throughput. The difference in the shapes can be seen in Figure 3. Pile-up in the DPP is reduced due to the properties of the triangular shaping in the fast channel, used in pile-up rejection. Figure 3. Oscilloscope traces for a 66 kev gamma-ray. The green trace is the preamp output, while the light blue trace is the input to the DC in the DP5. The pink trace shows the trapezoidal pulse used in the DP5 while the blue trace shows the analog approximation. The plot on the right shows the two pulses overlaid (the gain was adjusted to show the flat top). Note particularly (1) the flat top in the digital pulse and () the exponential tail in the analog pulse continuing after the digital pulse has terminated. G.F. Knoll, Radiation detection and measurement, 4 th ed, John Wiley & Sons, 1, p 669. 3 R. Redus, "Digital pulse processors: Theory of operation", mptek application note N-DPP-1, 9. Page of 8

Data were taken with this coaxial HPGe detector, the Canberra 5 and MC8, and the DP5 to verify these theoretical advantages. Table 1 shows the energy resolution, in kev FWHM, measured by the two systems at several gamma-ray energies using common isotopes. t low energy, the resolution is dominated by electronic noise and the two systems yield very similar results. t higher energies, the resolution of the DP5 is better than the analog system. This is due to ballistic deficit: with a shorter flat top but fixed peaking time, the DP5 resolution became worse. Extending the flat top beyond.8 s led to no additional resolution improvements. The ability to eliminate ballistic deficit and the near decoupling of peaking time (which determines noise) and flat top is another key advantage of the DPP. Energy (kev) 14.4 1 66 1173 1333 DP5 1.4 1.3 1.7.5.19 nalog 1.5 1.36 1.85.18.49 Table 1. Chart showing the resolution, in kev FWHM, measured at various gamma-ray energies with the digital and analog systems. Figure 4 shows spectra taken using the HPGe detector with both the DP5 and the analog signal processor at an incoming count rate (ICR) of 85 kcps, for about a 6% dead time in both systems. The insert is a zoomed view of the sum peak at 133 kev. The shape of the primary spectrum is very similar in the two systems. But notice the difference in the pile-up spectrum. The digital system has fewer piled up events, between the main and sum peak, particularly at the lower amplitudes. The sum peak has both a lower intensity and is narrower. The DP5 used a 1 ns peak time in the fast channel. Figure 5 shows throughput, sum peak fraction, and pile-up peak fraction for the two systems. These data were obtained using a.5 mci 57 Co source at distances up to 1 meter. The throughput was defined as the total counts divided by the real time for the analog system and the acquisition time for the DP5. The pileup fraction was defined as the ratio of pile-up counts (gross counts between the 136 kev peak and the sum peak) to the photopeak, while the sum peak fraction is the ratio of counts in the sum peak to the photopeak. The DP5 provides a higher throughput and fewer counts in the sum peak and in the pile-up peak. 1.E+5 1.E+4 ICR = 85 kcps (6% dead time) nalog DP5 nalog DP5 1.E+3 Counts 1.E+ 18 13 13 134 136 1.E+1 1.E+ 4 6 8 1 1 14 Energy (kev) Figure 4. 137 Cs spectra measured with the analog and digital systems at 85 kcps (6% dead time), The insert zooms in on the sum peak at 133 kev. Page 3 of 8

1.E+5 16% DP5 OCR nalog OCR 1% OCR (s -1 ) 1.E+4 nalog Pile-Up DP5 Pile-Up 8% Pile-up Fraction nalog Sum Peak 4% DP5 Sum Peak 1.E+3 % 1.E+3 1.E+4 1.E+5 1.E+6 ICR (s -1 ) Figure 5. Plot showing the throughput and the fraction of counts in the sum peak and piled up for the analog and digital systems. Live Time Correction The live time correction in the DP5 works slightly differently than in conventional analog systems [ 4 ]. In the analog system, there is a free-running real time clock. The live time clock is obtained by gating off the real time when the incoming pulse is above threshold. To get the true rate of photopeak counts, the measured counts are divided by the live time rather than the real time. In the DP5, the real time is replaced by the acquisition time. Data acquisition must be stopped in the DP5 when data are read out from memory (and during preamplifier resets, with a reset-style preamp). The acquisition time is a real time clock which is gated off when the system is not acquiring data. It is not gated off by pulses so does not correct for count rate or pile-up. It represents the actual duration of data acquisition. In the DP5, the fast channel is used to directly measure the incoming count rate (ICR): the ICR is the number of counts measured in the fast channel divided by the acquisition time. The output count rate (OCR) is the total number of counts in the spectrum (after counts are eliminated due to pile-up, etc) divided by acquisition time. The ratio OCR/ICR is the live time fraction. To obtain the true photopeak count rate, the number of counts in the photopeak is multiplied by this fraction: ICR N fast Rcorr Rmeas Rmeas OCR Ntot where R meas is the measured photopeak counts, N fast is the number of counts in the fast channel (input counts), N tot is the total number of counts in the spectrum, ICR is the incoming count rate (N fast / T acq ), OCR is the output count rate (N tot /T acq ), and T acq is the acquisition time. second order improvement can be obtained by correcting the ICR measured by the fast channel for dead time in the fast channel: N fast _ corr N N 1 T fast fast acq FST [1] [] 4 Redus, R.H.,.C. Huber, D.J. Sperry, "Dead time correction in the DP5 digital pulse processor", IEEE Nucl. Sci. Symp. Conf. Rec., Oct 8, pp 3416-34 (9). Page 4 of 8

where FST is the fast channel peaking time. This method requires the fast and slow channels to measure the same pulses so the thresholds must be the same. The plot below shows data taken using a 57 Co source to validate this approach. Spectra were taken at source distances between 4 and 4 inches. The black curve shows the expected count rate. This was computed for a point source and a detector with circular apertures [ 5 ], normalized to the farthest measurement. s the source is moved closer, the photopeak count rate should increase according to this curve. The dashed red line shows the uncorrected photopeak count rate in the DP5, that is, the net counts in the photopeak divided by the accumulation time. The solid red line shows the result of applying Eq. [1] and [], and the resulting corrected photopeak count rate is in excellent agreement with the data. Data were also taken using the analog system with.5 and s shaping time constants. The analog system is in good agreement at the shorter shaping time. Normalized Photopeak Count Rate (with livetime correction) 1. 1. 1/r DP5 nalog ( us) nalog (.5 us) DP5 uncorrected 1.. 5. 1. 15.. 5. 3. 35. 4. 45. Distance (inches) Figure 6. Plot demonstrating live time correction in the digital and analog systems. This measurement shows the validity of using the fast channel count rate, the ICR, to correct for dead time in the DP5. It also shows that the results of the DP5 are in better agreement than the analog system. 5 N. Tsoulfanidis, Measurement and Detection of Radiation, Hemisphere Publishing, 1983, p 51 Page 5 of 8

HOW TO CONFIGURE THE DP5 FOR HPGE N-DPP-3 Rev : Using the DP5 with HPGe To configure the DP5 for an HPGe detector, the first step is adding components to implement a polezero circuit. The second step is to tune the software adjustable signal processing parameters. POLE ZERO CNCELLTION Most HPGe detectors use preamps with resistive feedback, producing a tail pulse, while the DP5 is configured from the factory for a reset type preamplifier. To use the DP5 with a tail pulse input, the pole in the preamp response must be zeroed, which requires changing the front end circuit slightly. Section 7.3 of the DP5 User's Manual discusses this in general, for any tail pulse input. In this section, we will show a specific example, changing the circuit for a 5 s preamp tail. The first step is to add a pot at R1 to cancel the input pole. The DP5 manual says to estimate a value from R1 = /6.8 nf, where is the preamp pole. For =5 s, this gives R1=7.35 k. We placed a 1 k pot for R1 to give some adjustment. The second step is to estimate a value for R13 (R6 will be removed). The requirement is that the parallel combination of R1, with the series combination of R3 and R13, should be 47, as shown in Eq. 3. For this example, we compute R1=14. We removed R6 and placed a 5 pot for R13. 1 1 1 = R1= -R3 1 1 47 1 1 + - R13 R1+R3 47 R13 The third step is to adjust these pots. In the software, set the flat top duration to the longest available for your chosen peaking time (the long flat top makes adjustment easy). Connect an oscilloscope to the DC output, J8 (pin 1 is the signal, pin is ground). You will see a pulse shape like that in Figure 8 (left), with a long tail and a visible slope to the flat top. djust R1 until the long tail vanishes, as shown in the middle trace. There will still be a slope on the top and a small tail at the return to baseline. Now adjust R13 until the top is flat and the pulse returns smoothly to baseline, as shown on the right. When this shape is seen, the pots are adjusted properly. The circuit can be used with the pots, or they can be removed and fixed resistors of equal value installed, if you prefer. C7 [3] R11 R19 R1 Input from Preamp 1 3 J4 R HEDER 3 R77 TP1 SIGNL_IN R51 R139 R R5 R14 9 D1 1 4 3-5.5V 6 - +VS 5.5V /PD + -VS -5.5V 5 1 R U16 D4841-1YRJZ R5 C7 C69 6.8NF, NPO, 1% R13 R3 36 1PPM R6 11 1PPM TP15 HIGHPSS GIN4 GIN3 GIN GIN1 3 5.5V + - C86-5.5V 1PF 5.5V U DG611YRUZ 1 VDD 3 16 14 15 9 11 1 8 6 7 GND VSS 5 4 5 7 1 8 13 4 6 U19 D89R R3 499 1PPM -5.5V R38 54.9 1PPM G = 1.91 Figure 7. Schematic of the first stage in the DP5 analog prefilter circuit. more complete schematic is in Figure 7-4 of the DP5 User Manual. Page 6 of 8

Figure 8. Scope traces illustrating the pole-zero adjustment. GIN RNGE CHNGE full scale signal on the MC corresponds to a pulse into the DC of about 1.V, and at the DP5's minimum gain of.75, this is 1.3V. With a preamplifier gain of 5 mv/mev, this means that the maximum full scale signal is.6 MeV. To increase the maximum full scale signal, the input network to U16 can be used to attenuate the signal. For example, if the preamp has a 93 output resistor and a resistor is installed in R5, the signal is attenuated by about 1%, increasing the maximum signal commensurately. By selecting appropriate resistors in R5 and R51, the maximum scale can be adjusted. But the preamp output resistor must be included in the calculation because it becomes part of the divider. CONFIGURING THE SIGNL PROCESSING PRMETERS Figure 3 shows typical oscilloscope traces. It is convenient to connect an oscilloscope to the DP5, to see these pulses as the parameters are adjusted. For this figure, the scope was connected to the MP3OUT test point (this shows the DC input) and to the DC output (J8, pin 1 is signal) to see the shaped pulse. The fast channel pulse can also be displayed by the DC. Key Parameters Input Polarity: NEGTIVE (for the preamp configuration here). Input Offset: DEFULT was used here. Reset Lockout: Set to OFF for a tail pulse preamp. Gain: This obviously depends on the energy range to be measured. It was set to.75 for the measurements here, with.6 MeV full scale. Pile-up rejection: We usually take spectra with pile-up rejection enabled. However, it is often helpful to turn this off initially: if the software is not configured correctly, it may reject all pulses, leading to much confusion. Once everything is adjusted right, then turn on pile-up rejection. Risetime discrimination: We recommend disabling this discrimination initially. Once the system is working properly, RTD can be used to reject slowly rising pulses, if this is desired. Shaping Time Parameters There are three different parameters related to pulse shaping: peaking time, flat top, and fast channel peaking time. Their selection impacts performance quite a bit and differs from analog shaping: Flat Top: The flat top duration is quite important in large coaxial HPGe detectors. The charge collection time can be quite long (see Figure 9), and if it is longer than the duration of the flat top, resolution is degraded (an effect called ballistic deficit). The digital processor has two advantages over the analog system: (1) if the flat top is set longer than collection time, there is zero ballistic deficit, and () the flat top can be adjust separately from the peaking time. Peaking Time: The peaking time largely determines the rms electronic noise and the pulse duration, hence throughput and pile-up. digital processor with peaking time T peak has characteristics similar to, and slightly better than, that of an analog shaper with time constant.4 T peak. Page 7 of 8

Fast Channel Peaking Time: The fast channel resolves pulses which overlap in the slow channel. It is used in the pile-up reject logic (PUR) and to estimate the incoming count rate (ICR). The fast channel peaking can be set to 5, 1 or 4 nsec (, 4, 16) for an 8 ( MHz) DC clock. Setting this to a short value will generally help the circuits to distinguish closely spaced peaks. However, there are a few disadvantages to setting it too short: (1) Electronic noise increases, so the noise threshold is higher, so both PUR and ICR circuits fail to detect small events. () The fast channel pulse duration becomes a strong function of the charge collection time so varies significantly from one event to the next. This can make understanding the throughput and pile-up more difficult. Figure 9. Plot showing risetime variability with an HPGe detector. The green trace is the preamp output. The light blue trace is the DC input. The pink trace is the "fast channel" of the DP5, set to 1 nse peaking time. The dark blue trace is the output of a Canberra 5 with.5 s shaping time constant. The trace on the left shows a fast preamp risetime (<5 ns). In the middle trace, the risetime is ns, which leads to a smaller and wider fast channel pulse. The trace on the right has a 35 ns risetime and a curved edge, leading to distorted fast channel pulse. Page 8 of 8