French sodium-cooled fast reactor Simulation Program

Similar documents
Technology Readiness Levels for Partitioning and Transmutation of Minor Actinides in Japan

June Phase 3 Executive Summary Pre-Project Design Review of Candu Energy Inc. Enhanced CANDU 6 Design

SIX REQUIREMENTS FOR NUCLEAR ENERGY SYSTEM AND CANDLE REACTOR ABSTRACT

THE NURESAFE PROPOSAL

CD/1895 Conference on Disarmament 14 September 2010

Translation University of Tokyo Intellectual Property Policy

International Confidence to Japanese Nuclear Activities

Draft executive summaries to target groups on industrial energy efficiency and material substitution in carbonintensive

POWER FLATTENING FOR SODIUM COOLED METALLIC FUEL CANDLE REACTOR BY ADDING THORIUM IN INNER CORE

A roadmap to the realization of fusion energy

Rosatom Approach to IPR Management in Collaborative Projects on Innovations

Control and maintenance of the Superphenix knowledge and its specific sodium skills through an innovative partnership between EDF and AREVA

Technology readiness evaluations for fusion materials science & technology

The EUR: a great achievement and still on its way Eric de FRAGUIER, EDF EUR Steering Committee Chairman

ETSON: Role and activities for harmonizing safety assessment practices. Benoit De Boeck ETSON President. N2017 ETSON - Pitesti (May 2017) 1

NUGENIA position paper. Ageing of Low Voltage Cable in Nuclear Environment. 12 February 2015

Fuel Cycle Options Analysis

Foundations for Knowledge Management Practices for the Nuclear Fusion Sector

The use of technical readiness levels in planning the fusion energy development

NSNI Priorities related to Advanced Nuclear Designs

A Pathway to DEMO - Activities for DEMO in Korea

INPRO Dialogue Forum on Legal and Institutional Issues in the Global Deployment of SMRs

2.1. The tools needed today, to train tomorrow s researchers

Space in the next MFF Commision proposals

COST FP9 Position Paper

Use of the Graded Approach in Regulation

ESNII: European Sustainable Nuclear Industrial Initiative

Special Newsletter Best Practices

BRI R&D Initiative on Housing Safety to Mitigate Earthquake Disasters in Collaboration with Research Institutes

FUTURE IAEA ROLES IN SUPPORT OF SUSTAINABLE NUCLEAR ENERGY. Roberto Cirimello Argentina

(INPRO CP SYNERGIES)

TCP on Solar Power and Chemical Energy Systems (SolarPACES TCP)

Overview of U.S. DOE Nuclear Energy Instrumentation and Control R&D

Tools of strategic governance of industrial innovation: Smart specialisation. 24 October, ECRN Jan Larosse

Franco German press release. following the interview between Ministers Le Maire and Altmaier, 18 December.

THE EM LEAD LABORATORY: PROVIDING THE RESOURCES AND FRAMEWORK FOR COMPLEXWIDE ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANUP-STEWARDSHIP ACTIVITIES

NEPIO s Role in Incorporating 3S into the Nuclear Power Programme

INFCIRC/57. 72/Rev.6. under. Safetyy. read in. Convention. involve. National Reports. on Nuclear 2015.

Neil Hyatt* Department of Materials Science & Engineering, University of Sheffield, UK

Applying systems thinking to safety assurance of Nuclear Power Plants

Development of the Strategic Research Agenda of the Implementing Geological Disposal of Radioactive Waste Technology Platform

Harmonization of Nuclear Codes & Standards Pacific Nuclear Council Working and Task Group Report

Enhancing SMEs Participation in Global Production Chains by Creation of Common Database

Phase 2 Executive Summary: Pre-Project Review of AECL s Advanced CANDU Reactor ACR

Evolution of Knowledge Management: From Expert Systems to Innovation 2.0

Application of Safeguards Procedures

ECCA survey on clusters` Circular Construction portfolio

Wind Energy Technology Roadmap

INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY TECHNICAL MEETING ON FUEL DESIGN AND LICENSING OF MIXED CORES FOR WATER COOLED REACTORS

UN GA TECHNOLOGY DIALOGUES, APRIL JUNE

1. Recognizing that some of the barriers that impede the diffusion of green technologies include:

Please send your responses by to: This consultation closes on Friday, 8 April 2016.

Proposing a European Partnership in HORIZON EUROPE

LICENSING THE PALLAS-REACTOR USING THE CONCEPTUAL SAFETY DOCUMENT

IAEA-SM-367/13/07 DEVELOPMENT OF THE PHYSICAL MODEL

HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY NATIONAL NUCLEAR ENERGY AGENCY INDONESIA For FNCA Human Resource Development 2003 Guritno Lokollo

WSIS+10 REVIEW: NON-PAPER 1

the relevant needs of the existing power stations remains the mainstay of the Cooperation.

Organization Outline & Present Activities of. Nuclear Decommissioning (IRID)

2. At its meeting on 3 November 2008, the Working Party reached agreement on the attached draft conclusions.

Asia Disaster Reduction Science and Technology Forum on December 4, 2006 BPPT Building II, Jakarta, Indonesia. Tatsuo Narafu

Chapter 11 Cooperation, Promotion and Enhancement of Trade Relations

Global citizenship at HP. Corporate accountability and governance. Overarching message

Contents of Presentation

Building the ERA of Knowledge for Growth. Proposals for the 7 th Research Framework Programme

A Roadmap toward Fusion DEMO Reactor (first report)

CNSC s Regulatory Approach to Small Modular Reactors and Other Advanced Technologies Presentation to UK Nuclear Graduates

INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY 58TH GENERAL CONFERENCE (22 26 September 2014)

City of Sparks. Fiscal Year 2008 Strategic Plan Progress Report

RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT PERFORMANCE INNOVATION ENVIRONMENT

COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 18 May /06 Interinstitutional File: 2005/0044 (CNS) RECH 130 ATO 48 COMPET 129

Accelerating Growth and Cost Reduction in the PV Industry

Trends in the Defense Industrial Base. Office of the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense Manufacturing and Industrial Base Policy

WORKSHOP ON EUROPEAN INDUSTRIAL LEADERSHI IN ICT

Contribution of civil society to industrial safety and safety culture: lessons from the ECCSSafe European research project

June 6 9, 2016 Alexander Glaser Princeton University. CVT Consortium for Verification Technology. Revision 2

International Cooperation in Strengthening Nuclear Security Capacities within Public Company Nuclear Facilities of Serbia

PGNiG. Code. of Responsible Gas and Oil Production

The ARCHER Project. NC2I Workshop, 18 March, Brussels. The pied ARCHER de page Project, NC2I Workshop, 18 March 2015, Brussels

Joint Declaration of Intent. of the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry of Japan, the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications of Japan

Interagency Collaboration: Barriers / Solutions

ITF Subsea Processing Initiative. Ian McCabe - Technology Project Team Leader

Section 1: Internet Governance Principles

UTILIZING RESEARCH REACTOR SIMULATORS FOR REACTOR OPERATOR TRAINING AND LICENSING ABSTRACT

Brief presentation of the results Ioana ISPAS ERA NET COFUND Expert Group

Europe as a Global Actor. International Dimension of Horizon 2020 and Research Opportunities with Third Countries

Project Territorial Strategies for Innovation

Flexibility in materials processing

Co-operative Programme on Decommissioning Projects CPD. Jean-Guy Nokhamzon CEA/DEN/DPA

Roadmap of Cooperative Activities

Towards EU-US Collaboration on the Internet of Things (IoT) & Cyber-physical Systems (CPS)

Instrumentation and Control

Horizon 2020 Towards a Common Strategic Framework for EU Research and Innovation Funding

Prepared by the Working Group on the Use of Nuclear Power Sources in Outer Space

16502/14 GT/nj 1 DG G 3 C

Joint Research Centre (JRC)

Consultancy on Technological Foresight

Results and Achievements of the ARCHER Project

Statement of Corporate Intent

Presentation of the results. Niels Gøtke, Chair of the expert group and Effie Amanatidou, Rapporteur

Transcription:

資料 1 French sodium-cooled fast reactor Simulation Program Dr. Nicolas Devictor Program manager «Generation IV reactors» Nuclear Energy Division French Alternative Energies and Atomic Energy Commission www.cea.fr Audition by the Fast Reactor Strategic Working Group June 1st, 2018 Tokyo www.cea.fr 31 MAI 2018 CEA 10 AVRIL 2012 PAGE 1

The French fast reactor program until 2017 31 MAI 2018 PAGE 2

FRENCH NUCLEAR POLICY: THE RATIONALE FOR A CLOSED FUEL CYCLE AND ITS EVOLUTION TOWARDS MORE SUSTAINABILITY TOWARDS INCREASING SUSTAINABILITY Gen. II & III Pu-monorecycling GenIV : Pu + Minor Actinides multi-recycling Pu mono-recycling - LWR reactors - Pu-recycling in MOX fuel Pu multi-recycling Breakthroughs on cycle and fast reactors are needed Main incentives for Gen IV development Major resource saving Pu stockpile minimization Energetic independence and economic stability Decrease of waste burden and optimization of the disposal Public acceptance - Multi-Through Cycle - Fast-Reactors (FR) The French Multi-annual Energy Plan (MEP) is updated every 5 years. An update will be issued end of 2018 after the on-going public debate. The governmental document issued to support the public debate on energy confirms the closed fuel cycle strategy, as it allows for Pu management and ensures sustainability of nuclear energy. Reference of the French roadmap is based on the reprocessing of oxide fuel (hydrometallurgy) and the use of Fast Reactors. Priority is given to Sodium-cooled Fast Reactors (mature technology). Active survey is performed on other technologies through collaborations. PAGE 3

CONTENT OF THE ASTRID PROGRAM (FRENCH STATE CEA AGREEMENT SIGNED IN 2010) ASTRID aims to validate breakthroughs on cycle and SFR. The Agreement covers the period 2010-2019 (until basic design studies for reactor) and considers 4 pillars. ASTRID design studies Integrated Technology Demonstrator 600 MW(e) 4 th generation reactor Irradiation tool Core fabrication workshop (MOX fuel) R&D Development of new generation of simulation tools Use of information from Phénix and Superphénix Full scale component testing Large test sodium loops Refurbishment of zero power reactor MASURCA Severe accidents experimental program PAGE 4

ASTRID (ADVANCED SODIUM TECHNOLOGICAL REACTOR FOR INDUSTRIAL DEMONSTRATION) ASTRID is a technological reactor (pre-foak of commercial reactor) for Gen IV demonstration at an industrial scale (~600 MWe) of the relevancy and performances of innovations in the fields of safety and operability. The technology of ASTRID allows to have a very resilient design to external events (earthquake, flooding, loss of power, airplane crash ) Based on the feedback experiences of past Sodium-cooled Fast Reactors operated in the world, examples of innovations Mitigation devices (core catcher ) Larger in-service inspection capabilities Core with an improved intrinsic behavior Industrial partners Leaders in nuclear and high-tech PAGE 5

ASTRID: THE JAPANESE CONTRIBUTION May 2014: General Arrangement between CEA, METI and MEXT. That arrangement covers the cooperation until the end of the Basic Design (until end of 2019) August 2014: Implementing Arrangement between CEA, Framatome, JAEA, MHI and MFBR with a contribution to: Design Acknowledgment of excellent cooperation and decision to extend the scope of Japanese contribution to ASTRID nuclear island design. Topics have been included as component manufacturability studies in Japan (above core structure, polar table ), transients assessment, behavior of main vessels Japanese partners are making recommendations for ASTRID design improvements based on the on-going joint evaluation on safety function and their feedback experience. Since 2017, joint review of Astrid specifications to assess the conditions to develop a joint design that could be applicable in France and in Japan. R&D Topics: fuel qualification, core and structure materials (exchanges of database, joint development of technological process), instrumentations, severe accidents (joint development of SIMMER-V), thermalhydraulic analysis. Feasibility studies for qualification experiments in Japanese facilities (Joyo, ATHENA, Takasago facilities, ) have been performed with positive conclusions. Plandtl2 experiments are on-going. Japanese skills, knowledge and experimental facilities are very valuable to the ASTRID program. PAGE 6

Evolution in the French program 31 MAI 2018 PAGE 7

FRENCH CONTEXT AT THE END OF 2017 Context at the end of 2017: the need for commercial deployment of fast neutron reactors is seen as much less urgent, due to the current context of the uranium market. In this new context, the French Government asked questions to CEA about the current definition of the ASTRID program. In answer to that questioning, CEA proposed a Sodium Fast neutron Reactor Simulation Program, including experimental facilities, among which a demonstration reactor in the range of 100-200 emw. The SFR Simulation program should be consistent with a sustainable expenses chronicle for next years. High-level objectives of the Sodium Fast neutron Reactor Simulation Program remain the same as those of ASTRID program: Maintain open, over the long term, the strategy of the closed fuel cycle. Capability of deployment of a safe, performing and competitive industrial fleet of large size SFR network (economical aspect has to be considered under the «electricity production» and «fuel cycle and fissile material Pu and U - management» aspects). The SFR Simulation Program work program should permit to obtain data, at cheaper cost than the previous ASTRID program, allowing to start design and licensing of a commercial reactor of 1GWe with a fulfilment of utilities specifications (for instance for France: 60 years useful lifetime, 80% for the load factor, (U,Pu)O 2 core burn-up of 120GWd/tHM with Pu from spent MOX fuel and ODS cladding). The work program will permit to develop validated numerical simulation tools that will allow to speedup design and licensing phases of commercial SFR thanks to the combination with experimental program 31 MAI 2018 and the feedback experience from the operation of the demonstration reactor. PAGE 8

SFR SIMULATION PROGRAM Scientific and technological issues identified for the development of industrial SFR Improvement of knowledge on SFR (neutronics, fuel, material, technologies, ) and fuel cycle related R&D on physics Improvment of basic knowledge on fuel, nuclear data, neutronics, materials, key technologies Numerical simulation program Capability to simulate all situations (normal operation, incidental and accidental situations), to justify the design and to support a robust safety demonstration. The simulation tools should have performances in terms of predictability to shorten design and construction phases, and later on to support the operation and optimize the maintenance. Improvement of simulation codes, their qualification level, coupling, margins. Integration of benefits of HPC progresses in next decades. Experimental qualification program Acquisition of experimental data to support the validation of physical models and the qualification of simulation codes Experimental platforms in France and abroad Smaller size demonstration reactor ( New-ASTRID ) 31 MAI 2018 PAGE 9

OBJECTIVES FOR SFR SIMULATION PROGRAM Use for design and licence Qualification for New-ASTRID will use available or under design facilities New ASTRID Contribution to validation Pu burner and transmutation fuels qualification Decision to invest in 1eGW SFR Justification of target performances on core, 60 years useful lifetime, load factor, Justification of technologies performances Implementation of policy for U, Pu and minor actinides management Current knowledge in 2018 Contribution to validation Outputs of current ASTRID program Available databases, numerical simulation tools, and facilities in operation or under design (Joyo, ATHENA, JHR, Plinius2, Zephyr, ) Feedback experience of Rapsodie, Phénix, Superphénix, Joyo, Monju, projects as SPX2, EFR, JSFR R&D on physics and experimental program in Japanese and French facilities PAGE 10

EXAMPLES OF EXTRAPOLATION Large core behavior: Progresses in Monte-Carlo tools + use of SuperPhénix neutronics database for qualification Qualification of performances of commercial reactor core or transmutation cores or burner core: irradiation of set of subassemblies in New-ASTRID + physics experiments in mockups (Zephyr) Justification of 60 years of lifetime: Exploitation of material samples from Phénix and Superphénix Development of the coupling of CFD and thermomechanical models to assess the behavior of structures of the whole nuclear island, taken into account progresses in HPC, and experimental data from specific instrumentation in several locations in New-ASTRID Large size components: use of feedback experience of manufacturing and operation. In case of doubt, tests on specific loops are always possible. Same strategy for the New-ASTRID licensing than for the commercial reactor for severe accidents situations, sodium leakage, practically eliminated situations, Topics with a small influence of the reactor power: inspection under sodium, provisions for sodium leakage, severe accidents analysis (as a large part of experiments will be performed in specific reactor or facilities), optimization of design codes (RCC-MRx or JSME for instance), PAGE 11

NEW-ASTRID OBJECTIVES IN THE SFR SIMULATION PROGRAM Capability to demonstrate fuel performances depending on the different options of management of the uranium and actinides (multirecycling of plutonium, Pu burner, support to the development of fuels for transmutation ) Qualification of components and performances of French and Japanese cores for future SFRs Contribution to the experimental part through the characterization of the behavior of SFR (for instance performance of natural convection tests) and of systems and components in real condition (irradiation conditions, integral demonstration, ) Confirmation in real conditions that industrial performances can be reached by SFR, especially considering in service inspection and reparation and maintenance Due to its coupling with the electrical network, qualification of the performances of the steam generator As past realizations in France and in Japan are now rather old, the feedback experience from the different phases of the project will allow to set up an updated safety and normative frame validated by safety authorities for future commercial SFR, and to support skills preservation in all the actors (engineering, vendors, supply chain, management, safety authority, R&D) PAGE 12

SFR SIMULATION PROGRAM: IMPLEMENTATION 2018: preparation of the 1 st strategic roadmap for SFR Simulation program, including the following items : objectives, preliminary assessment of the cost, New-ASTRID specifications, assessment of potential partnerships 2019 will be used to implement the SFR Simulation program for an effective start-up in 2020. The SFR Simulation program will be implemented with successive phases of 5-years duration, the content of which will be describe in a 5-years operational roadmap. A commitment of a partner in one phase will not oblige it to continue in the next phases. During the 1 st phase 2020-2024, forecast work program includes, in addition to numerical simulation and R&D activities, the end of design of the New-ASTRID at a level allowing to start detailed design. A milestone will be set-up in 2024 to check if conditions are fulfilled to decide to launch detailed design and administrative processes to obtain the authorization for construction. PAGE 13

SFR SIMULATION PROGRAM: PARTNERSHIPS FOR 2020-2024 French proposal is that Japan should be the main foreign partner of the whole SFR Simulation program as the two countries have similar nuclear policies and the technical collaboration from 2014 is successful. Examples of part of joint program for 2020-2024: Pursuing and enlarging joint development of numerical simulation tools, as for instance the development of SIMMER V and SEASON platform Implementation of a joint roadmap on experimental platforms (for instance ATHENA, MTL-3, Joyo in Japan, Plinius2 in France) and pursuing joint experimental programs New-ASTRID: sharing design studies. The Japanese answer in the year 2018 will be an important input for French government. Other partnership? USA and France signed in April 2018 a Statement of Intent on a future collaboration on SFR. CEA will work with DOE during 2018 to confirm possibilities for a US participation to the SFR Simulation program. PAGE 14

2017-03-20: Declaration of Intent between FRANCE and JAPAN including the proposal to strengthen future ASTRID collaboration PAGE 15