Other Transaction Authority (OTA)

Similar documents
Other Transactions (OTs) for Prototypes and the Information Warfare Research Project (IWRP) Consortium OT

AF Life Cycle Management Center

Information Warfare Research Project

Other Transaction Agreements. Chemical Biological Defense Acquisition Initiatives Forum

U.S. ARMY RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT AND ENGINEERING COMMAND

DEFENSE AUTOMOTIVE TECHNOLOGIES CONSORTIUM (DATC) WORKSHOP OCTOBER 12, 2017

A Translation of the Contracting Alphabet: From BAAs to OTAs

Defense Microelectronics Activity (DMEA) Advanced Technology Support Program IV (ATSP4) Organizational Perspective and Technical Requirements

Technology and Manufacturing Readiness Levels [Draft]

Foundations Required for Novel Compute (FRANC) BAA Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) Updated: October 24, 2017

DoD Research and Engineering Enterprise

Air Force Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) Program

RAPID FIELDING A Path for Emerging Concept and Capability Prototyping

DoD Research and Engineering

Arshad Mansoor, Sr. Vice President, Research & Development INNOVATION SCOUTS: EXPANDING EPRI S TECHNOLOGY INNOVATION NETWORK

How to Establish and Manage a Technology Transfer Office

Technology Roadmapping. Lesson 3

Distribution Restriction Statement Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.

COMMERCIAL INDUSTRY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT BEST PRACTICES Richard Van Atta

Incentive Guidelines. Aid for Research and Development Projects (Tax Credit)

Module 1 - Lesson 102 RDT&E Activities

TECHNOLOGY INNOVATION LEGISLATION HIGHLIGHTS

Cooperative Agreements and Other Transactions Entered for Fiscal Year 2005

A New Way to Start Acquisition Programs

The Naval Undersea Warfare Center Division Newport

Workshop. Debbie Lilu, CTMA Director Bill Chenevert, Senior Program Manager Marc Sharp, Project Manager

OTHER TRANSACTIONS AGREEMENTS. John Nunziat o jnunziat sosseci nc. com

Program Success Through SE Discipline in Technology Maturity. Mr. Chris DiPetto Deputy Director Developmental Test & Evaluation October 24, 2006

Lesson 17: Science and Technology in the Acquisition Process

DoD Research and Engineering Enterprise

NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL

David N Ford, Ph.D.,P.E. Zachry Department of Civil Engineering Texas A&M University. Military Acquisition. Research Project Descriptions

Strategic Guidance. Quest for agility, innovation, and affordability. Distribution Statement A: Approved for Public Release

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED. EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification DATE: February 2005

CPC Essentials I Part A Introduction to CPC Essentials and Patent Classification Systems

LOGICAL FRAMEWORK MATRIX LFM

CRS Report for Congress

Digital Engineering Support to Mission Engineering

Report to Congress regarding the Terrorism Information Awareness Program

Army Research Laboratory -Orlando TSIS 2017

Test & Evaluation Strategy for Technology Development Phase

OTHER TRANSACTION AGREEMENTS FOR BASIC, APPLIED AND ADVANCED 1

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 Shopping List Item No. 127 Page 1 of 1

Our Acquisition Challenges Moving Forward

DANUBE INNOVATION PARTNERSHIP

Under the Patronage of His Highness Sayyid Faisal bin Ali Al Said Minister for National Heritage and Culture

Developing S&T Strategy. Lesson 1

Technology & Manufacturing Readiness RMS

Manufacturing Readiness Assessment Overview

Fact Sheet IP specificities in research for the benefit of SMEs

Department of Energy Technology Readiness Assessments Process Guide and Training Plan

Intellectual Property

Mission Capability Packages

FACTORS INFLUENCING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER

ECBC Update for Chemical Biological Defense Acquisition Initiatives Forum (CBDAIF)

Technology transactions and outsourcing deals: a practitioner s perspective. Michel Jaccard

Moving from R&D to Manufacture

LAW ON TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER 1998

Reducing Manufacturing Risk Manufacturing Readiness Levels

Innovation for Defence Excellence and Security (IDEaS)

An Assessment of Acquisition Outcomes and Potential Impact of Legislative and Policy Changes

DEFENSE ACQUISITION UNIVERSITY EMPLOYEE SELF-ASSESSMENT. Outcomes and Enablers

Terms of Reference. Call for Experts in the field of Foresight and ICT

The Eco-Patent Commons

DOD Technology Innovation & Transition

Violent Intent Modeling System

NASA s Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) and Small Business Technology Transfer (STTR) Programs. May 2, 2007

Prototyping: Accelerating the Adoption of Transformative Capabilities

Volume 4, Number 2 Government and Defense September 2011

Manufacturing Readiness Level Deskbook

SPACE EXPLORATION AS A DRIVER FOR GROWTH ESA INITIATIVE TO PARTNER WITH PRIVATE SECTOR

Space and Missile Systems Center

Jerome Tzau TARDEC System Engineering Group. UNCLASSIFIED: Distribution Statement A. Approved for public release. 14 th Annual NDIA SE Conf Oct 2011

Manufacturing Readiness Level (MRL) Deskbook Version 2016

International Cooperation for Small Satellite Development

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE F: NAVSTAR Global Positioning System User Equipment Space

UNITAID The HIV/AIDS Medicines Patent Pool Initiative Overview

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Office of Secretary Of Defense Page 1 of 5 R-1 Line #102

The Fourth Industrial Revolution in Major Countries and Its Implications of Korea: U.S., Germany and Japan Cases

SUBJECT: Army Directive (Acquisition Reform Initiative #3: Improving the Integration and Synchronization of Science and Technology)

_prop_lab_partner.htm

POLICY BRIEF. Defense innovation requires strong leadership coupled with a framework of

Technology Readiness Assessment of Department of Energy Waste Processing Facilities: When is a Technology Ready for Insertion?


Future of New Capabilities

ARTES Competitiveness & Growth Full Proposal. Requirements for the Content of the Technical Proposal. Part 3B Product Development Plan

Best Practices for Technology Transition. Technology Maturity Conference September 12, 2007

Management of Toxic Materials in DoD: The Emerging Contaminants Program

Presented at the 2017 ICEAA Professional Development & Training Workshop. TRL vs Percent Dev Cost Final.pptx

DoD Technology Transfer Program

Your SBIR Data Rights and How to Protect Them

Dear Prof Morelli, 1. Structure of the Network. Place: Att:

Manufacturing Readiness Levels (MRLs) and Manufacturing Readiness Assessments (MRAs)

Disruptive Aerospace Innovation Aeronautics and Space Engineering Board National Academy of Engineering

Clean Energy Smart Manufacturing Innovation Institute

IM - Innovation Management

Technology Transfer Principles: Methods, Knowledge States and Value Systems Underlying Successful Technological Innovation

Michigan State University College of Engineering; Dept. of Electrical and Computer Eng. ECE 480 Capstone Design Course Project Charter Fall 2017

KT for TT Ensuring Technologybased R&D matters to Stakeholders. Center on Knowledge Translation for Technology Transfer University at Buffalo

Transcription:

Other Transaction Authority (OTA) Col Christopher Wegner SMC/PK 15 March 2017

Overview OTA Legal Basis Appropriate Use SMC Space Enterprise Consortium Q&A Special Topic. 2

Other Transactions Authority Statutory Authority: 10 U.S.C. 2371b and Section 815 NDAA 2016 grants service level authority for prototype projects above $50M and less than $250M carry out prototype projects directly relevant to enhancing the mission effectiveness of military personnel and the supporting platforms, systems, components or materials proposed to be acquired or developed by the DoD, or to improvement of platforms, systems, components, or materials in use by the armed forces. Not part of the Federal Acquisition Regulation Provides more access to non-traditional contractors Allows traditional defense contractors to participate with certain constraints Provides ability for follow-on production contract or transaction* Given competitive selection of original OT and Successful completion of prototype project * Never exercised before under OT new authority added to NDAA 2016 3

Other Transactions - Appropriate Use Need to meet one of the following conditions: There is at least one nontraditional defense contract participating to a significant extent in the prototype project OR All significant participants in the transaction other than the Federal Government are small businesses or nontraditional defense contractors OR At least one third of the total cost of the prototype project is to be paid out of funds provided by parties to the transaction other than the Federal Government OR The senior procurement executive for the agency determines in writing that exceptional circumstances justify the use of a transaction that provides for innovative business arrangements or structures that would not be feasible or appropriate under a contract, or would provide an opportunity to expand the defense supply base in a manner that would not be practical or feasible under a contract 4

OT Advantages Rapid requirement-to-award process Broader access to innovative solutions (small business, traditional and nontraditional companies) Prototype development environment Proof of concept quickly (succeed or fail fast) Incorporate latest technology in real time No FAR or supplemental process/coordination to follow Requires appropriate organizational oversight Encourages open interaction throughout process May include requirements refinement to better scope project Aids in realizing the correct time to test or adjust vector Directly affects should cost & schedule initiatives for programs 5

Prototypes As defined by the 2017 OT Guide: Described as a preliminary pilot, test, evaluation, demonstration, or agile development activity used to evaluate the technical or manufacturing feasibility or military utility of a particular technology process, concept, end item, effect, or other discrete feature May include systems, subsystems, components, materials, methodology, technology, or processes Examples may include a proof of concept; a pilot; a novel application of commercial technologies for defense purposes; a creation, design, development, demonstration of technical or operational utility; or combinations of the foregoing, related to a prototype Quantity developed is limited to that needed to prove technical or manufacturing feasibility or evaluate military utility Shared investment OT agreements should be limited to those situations where there are commercial or other benefits to the awardee Must exclude duplicate work in previous efforts 6

Space Enterprise Consortium Overview SMC/AD is standing up a Space Enterprise Consortium (SpEC) Other Transaction (OT) to benefit the DoD Space Community The plan is currently underway, pending SAF/AQ approval This is not a standard DoD acquisition program Plan similar to Air Force Research Laboratory s C4ISR Consortium OT awarded in Jan 2016 This is a plan to facilitate space-related prototype development Establish a consortium by selecting manager as the liaison between the government and the consortium Consortium model encourages innovative solutions from nontraditional contractors and small businesses Low risk approach - intend to award small value prototype projects 7

Benefits of the Consortium Model A consortium arrangement will provide access to broader technology areas that support space enterprise development The SpEC will be a collective pool of Space technology developers from industry and academia The Consortium Manager ensures success by: Mentoring nontraditional and small businesses Encouraging and facilitating cooperative teaming Monitoring and executing payment for work Conducting industry outreach to build consortium membership Ensuring security and intellectual property protection Liaising with government customers and industry to build relationships 8

Scope of SpEC OT Wide range of space-related technology for prototype development: Technology areas includes space, ground, launch, propulsion, communication, range utilization, etc. Supports whole spectrum of acquisition life cycle Intended to process classified projects as required Prototypes may or may be related to Space Enterprise Vision Unique variables to be determined for each prototype Payment terms Data rights Classification 9

Summary Questions? 10