MOON Outcome of the Symposium on a New Era of Human and Robotic Exploration

Similar documents
estec PROSPECT Project Objectives & Requirements Document

The Global Exploration Roadmap International Space Exploration Coordination Group (ISECG)

Secretary-General of the European Commission, signed by Mr Jordi AYET PUIGARNAU, Director

1. Introduction. defining and producing new materials with advanced properties, or optimizing industrial processes.

Consultation on Long Term sustainability of Research Infrastructures

EU businesses go digital: Opportunities, outcomes and uptake

Confidence in SKYLON. Success on future engine test would mean "a major breakthrough in propulsion worldwide"

IAC-13-A THE ISECG GLOBAL EXPLORATION ROADMAP: STRENGTHENING EXPLORATION THROUGH INCREASED HUMAN ROBOTIC PARTNERSHIP

SPACE EXPLORATION AS A DRIVER FOR GROWTH ESA INITIATIVE TO PARTNER WITH PRIVATE SECTOR

Human Spaceflight: The Ultimate Team Activity

Christina Miller Director, UK Research Office

ESA Human Spaceflight Capability Development and Future Perspectives International Lunar Conference September Toronto, Canada

International Space Exploration Coordination Group Science White Paper Space Studies Board 2015 Fall Meeting 4 November 2015

A Call for Boldness. President Kennedy September 1962

Exploration Partnership Strategy. Marguerite Broadwell Exploration Systems Mission Directorate

European Space Agency Aurora European Space Exploration Programme EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Munkaanyag

Implementing the International Safety Framework for Space Nuclear Power Sources at ESA Options and Open Questions

ESA Strategic Framework for Human Exploration

Public Consultation: Science 2.0 : science in transition

ESA UNCLASSIFIED - Releasable to the Public. ESA Workshop: Research Opportunities on the Deep Space Gateway

High Level Forum, November Masazumi Miyake Director of International Relations Dept. JAXA

A RENEWED SPIRIT OF DISCOVERY

OECD s Innovation Strategy: Key Findings and Policy Messages

BEYOND LOW-EARTH ORBIT

Future technologies for planetary exploration within the European Exploration Envelope Programme at the European Space Agency

The NASA-ESA. Comparative Architecture Assessment

estec REQUEST FOR INFORMATION Technologies, science payloads, and commercial services for lunar missions ESA UNCLASSIFIED - For Official Use

H2020 Excellent science arie Skłodowska-Curie Actions. Your research career in Europe. 17 November 2015

SYMPOSIUM ON HUMAN SPACE ENDEAVOURS IAC-11.B3.1.8 THE GLOBAL EXPLORATION ROADMAP

Chem & Bio non-proliferation

Analysis of European Architectures for Space Exploration

NASA Mission Directorates

European Connected Health Alliance Bringing needs and solutions together for the Future of Health. ECHAlliance Update

General Questionnaire

HEOMD Update NRC Aeronautics and Space Engineering Board Oct. 16, 2014

OBN BioTuesday: Sources of Public Non-Dilutable Funding & Export Support to UK R&D Companies

Report on the European Commission's Public On-line Consultation. "Shaping the ICT research and innovation agenda for the next decade"

THE DIGITALISATION CHALLENGES IN LITHUANIAN ENGINEERING INDUSTRY. Darius Lasionis LINPRA Director November 30, 2018 Latvia

SatNav and SatCom Interfaces with GMES

New era for Eureka - relations with ETPs

Satellite Environmental Information and Development Aid: An Analysis of Longer- Term Prospects

Constellation Systems Division

TECHNOLOGY VISION 2017 IN 60 SECONDS

Realising the FNH-RI: Roadmap. Karin Zimmermann (Wageningen Economic Research [WUR], NL)

Munkaanyag

ESA PREPARATION FOR HUMAN LUNAR EXPLORATION. Scott Hovland European Space Agency, HME-HFH, ESTEC,

Innovation in Europe: Where s it going? How does it happen? Stephen Roper Aston Business School, Birmingham, UK

IAC-13,B3.1,8x Bernhard Hufenbach ESA ESTEC, Noordwijk, Netherlands,

Central and Eastern Europe Statistics 2005

Expanding human activities beyond LEO

Economic crisis, European Welfare State Models and Inequality

OBSTACLES AND OPPORTUNITIES FOR THE PECS INDUSTRY TO PARTICIPATE IN ESA PROGRAMMES SPACE4SME PROJECT. Prague April 25, 2008

KICK START ACTIVITY Augmented / Virtual Reality

Framework Programme 7 and SMEs. Amaury NEVE European Commission DG Research - Unit T4: SMEs

Current state of the debate regarding the role of Social Sciences and Humanities in Research and Innovation in the EU 1

Trade Barriers EU-Russia based in technical regulations

Public Private Partnerships & Idea selection

GLEX x12693 ASTEROID NEXT: A VIEW TO THE ROLE OF ASTEROID MISSIONS IN THE 2 ND ITERATION OF THE ISECG GLOBAL EXPLORATION ROADMAP

Pre-Commercial Procurement (PCP) Actions

Structuring Global International Cooperation in Space Exploration

EU Ecolabel EMAS Environmental Technology Verification (ETV) State-of-play and evaluations

Status and Outlook for European Exploration Envelope Programme

Joint Convention on the Safety of Spent Fuel Management and on the Safety of Radioactive Waste Management

Rebuilding for the Community in New Orleans

Background material 1

Business Clusters and Innovativeness of the EU Economies

The NASA-ESA Comparative Architecture Assessment (CAA)

SECTEUR Ascertaining user needs

ARTEMIS Industry Association. ARTEMIS Joint Undertaking ARTEMIS INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION & JOINT UNDERTAKING

Centralised Services 7-2 Network Infrastructure Performance Monitoring and Analysis Service

NASA Keynote to International Lunar Conference Mark S. Borkowski Program Executive Robotic Lunar Exploration Program

KICK START ACTIVITY Augmented / Virtual Reality

16502/14 GT/nj 1 DG G 3 C

FINAL DRAFT TECHNICAL REPORT CLC/FprTR RAPPORT TECHNIQUE TECHNISCHER BERICHT January English version

Poland: Competitiveness Report 2015 Innovation and Poland s Performance in

Exploration Systems Research & Technology

A RENEWED SPIRIT OF DISCOVERY

The Global Exploration Roadmap

Securing Canada s Place in Space: Key to Canada s Competitiveness

The Global Exploration Roadmap

Connecting to Grow the Space Economy

CDP-EIF ITAtech Equity Platform

Who Reads and Who Follows? What analytics tell us about the audience of academic blogging Chris Prosser Politics in

Earth is the cradle of the mind, but one cannot live in the cradle forever

July 25 th 2017, Webinar L. Duquerroy, R. Rinaldo ESA UNCLASSIFIED - For Official Use

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

Innovation policy mixes and implications on HEIs - emerging conclusions from the OECD innovation policy reviews

A TECHNOLOGY ROADMAP TOWARDS MINERAL EXPLORATION FOR EXTREME ENVIRONMENTS IN SPACE

Status and Outlook for the European Exploration Envelope Programme

OECD Science, Technology and Industry Outlook 2008: Highlights

5.0% 0.0% -5.0% -10.0% -15.0% 10.0% 5.0% 0.0% -5.0% -10.0% -15.0% 10.0% 5.0% 0.0% -5.0% -10.0% 16.00% 13.00% 10.00% 7.00% 4.

ERA-Net Smart Grids Plus

61 st International Astronautical Congress, Prague, CZ. Copyright 2010 by the International Astronautical Federation. All rights reserved.

ASSESSMENT OF DYNAMICS OF THE INDEX OF THE OF THE INNOVATION AND ITS INFLUENCE ON GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT OF LATVIA

NASA s Human Space Exploration Capability Driven Framework

Science-Driven Scenario for Space Exploration

Report of the. Standing Committee on. Traffic Psychology

Science at UK Space Agency

Enterprise architecture approach at European Space Agency (ESA)

Transcription:

MOON 2020-2030 Outcome of the Symposium on a New Era of Human and Robotic Exploration

European Space Agency From the beginnings of the space age, Europe has been actively involved in spaceflight. Today it launches satellites for Earth observation, navigation, telecommunications and astronomy, sends probes to the far reaches of the Solar System, and cooperates in the human exploration of space. Space is a key asset for Europe, providing essential information needed by decision-makers to respond to global challenges. Space provides indispensable technologies and services, and increases our understanding of our planet and the Universe. Since 1975, the European Space Agency (ESA) has been shaping the development of this space capability. The Member States are: 20 states of the EU (Austria, Belgium, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Spain, Sweden and the United Kingdom) plus Norway and Switzerland. Seven other EU states have Cooperation Agreements with ESA: Bulgaria, Cyprus, Lithuania, Malta, Latvia, Slovenia and Slovakia. Croatia is negotiating a Cooperation Agreement. Canada takes part in some programmes under a Cooperation Agreement. By pooling the resources of 22 Member States, ESA undertakes programmes and activities far beyond the scope of any single European country, developing the launchers, spacecraft and ground facilities needed to keep Europe at the forefront of global space activities. Cover image credit: NASA SVS

An ESA Human Spaceflight and Robotics Exploration production ESTEC, PO Box 299 2200 AG Noordwijk The Netherlands ESA and the ESA logo are trademarks of the European Space Agency. Images copyright European Space Agency unless stated otherwise. Permission to reproduce or distribute material identified as copyright of a third party must be obtained from the copyright owner concerned. www.esa.int @esa 4 CONTEXT 5 OBJECTIVES 6 PARTICIPANTS 7 THE ESA MOON CHALLENGE 8 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 11 OUTLOOK youtube.com/esa facebook.com/europeanspaceagency Copyright 2016 European Space Agency

Public domain Dylan O Donnell CONTEXT The next decade will likely see a renewed and sustained international effort to engage in exploration missions beyond low Earth-orbit. ESA and international partners are already involved in developing systems that enable this effort. The Space Launch System and Orion for example will carry astronauts to the Moon by the end of this decade. One driver of this renewed interest in the Moon is to assess the economic feasibility of using lunar resources for sustaining human surface exploration activities. We have already found evidence for frozen volatiles from lunar orbit including water ice inside permanently shaded regions near the lunar poles. How and in what form these compounds are distributed is not yet clear. Understanding where they are and whether we could access and use them is important for a sustainable long-term space exploration strategy. There is a strong scientific case for lunar surface exploration. Data from recent orbital missions and new analysis of Apollo samples using modern techniques show that the Moon is the closest place to Earth where we can find clues to the history of the Solar System, including that of the early Earth and of the formation of the Earth-Moon system. Insights into the environment, in which life began on Earth more than three billion years ago could be preserved in previously unexplored areas, such as the poles, the highlands and the far side of the Moon. 4 The International Space Station has been permanently inhabited since 2000 and will operate until at least 2020. The Space Station programme has demonstrated the importance of a robust international partnership for development, assembly, operations and effective utilisation. It has also shown the importance of communicating the programme s outcomes and benefits. Now that the development and assembly work is complete, it is time to build on this partnership and open it to new partners to continue the journey beyond low Earth-orbit. ESA s exploration strategy, in line with the Global Exploration Roadmap drawn up by the International Space Exploration Coordination Group, considers the Moon as the next destination for humans venturing beyond low Earth-orbit and an integral part of the roadmap towards human missions to Mars. This will be a global endeavour, achieved through cooperation and a shared international vision, building on the success of the International Space Station. Multiple partners will contribute capabilities and expertise towards common goals while pursuing their own priorities and strategic goals.

OBJECTIVES Committees Programme Committee The International Symposium on Moon 2020 2030: a New Era of Human and Robotic Exploration held at the European Space Agency s ESTEC centre in December 2015 brought European and international stakeholders together to lay the groundwork for a common scenario of increasingly integrated lunar exploration. The scenario includes an initial phase of robotic precursor missions followed by the return of human explorers to the surface of the Moon Co-Chairs Bernhard Hufenbach (ESA) James Carpenter (ESA) Ideas were sought for implementing approaches to human-robotic integration for better mission performance. In particular, the following questions were asked: Members Ian Crawford (Birkbeck University of London, UK) Kip Hodges (Arizona State University, USA) Ralf Jaumann (DLR, Germany) Katherine Joy (University of Manchester, UK) Michelle Lavagna (Politecnico di Milano, Italy) Dan Lester (University of Texas, USA) Igor Mitrofanov (IKI, Russia) Clive Neal (University of Notre Dame, USA) Armin Wedler (DLR, Germany) Organisation Committee Co-Chairs How can we move beyond separate mission planning of automated and human missions to a combination of both? How do we evolve our thinking about planetary exploration to models that include collaborations among space agencies, academia, and private enterprise? How do we build a flexible and sustained strategy for lunar exploration that looks beyond a single mission and envisions multiple missions of increasing complexity? Markus Landraf (ESA) Alessandro Bergamasco (ESA) ESA Moon Challenge Jury Markus Landgraf (Mission Scenarios) Shahrzad Hosseini (Operations) André Schiele (Telerobotics) James Carpenter (Science) Nigel Savage (Education) 5

PARTICIPANTS The symposium engaged a diverse and impactful audience. More than 200 colleagues from 25 countries representing the communities of academia, space agencies, industry and private sector gathered at ESTEC, ESA s technology centre in Noordwijk, The Netherlands, 14 16 December 2015 to discuss the future of lunar exploration in the next decade. To broaden the discussion beyond the space community, the participant list included economists, healthcare professionals and artists. There were also 22 students who were members of three teams that won the ESA Moon Challenge. As part of the symposium, ESA challenged teams of university students at the Bachelor, Master and PhD level to design a mission scenario for exploring the Moon using human-robotic integrated operations for increased mission performance. A total of 234 students from 56 countries responded to the call. 6

THE ESA MOON CHALLENGE At the kick-off of the ESA Moon Challenge in September 2015, students were introduced to the ESA-led mission architecture concept study that aims for the next steps in lunar exploration. Called Human-Enhanced Robotic Architecture and Capabilities for Lunar Exploration and Science, or HERACLES, it defines a series of teleoperated missions to the lunar surface for sampling and in-situ investigations based on a cis-lunar habitat. These missions will prepare human missions to the Moon in terms of technology and operations. The HERACLES concept served both as inspiration and as a set of constraints for the teams. Each team submitted their design in the form of a technical report containing the goals, design details, expected cost and timeline of the concepts. The teams also submitted a simulation illustrating activities on the lunar surface and its vicinity. The team members had to propose a potential contribution of their home country and that of their other team members. In November 2015, the jury selected three finalists, who were invited to ESA s Moon 2020-2030 symposium for the finals. ESA astronaut Jean- Francois Clervoy joined the sessions during the symposium as a guest jury member and co-host of the award ceremony. With members from the United Kingdom, Poland, the United States, Japan and Italy, team HECATE won the ESA Moon Challenge by unanimous vote from the jury. The ESA Moon Challenge proved very successful and showed there is potential for further contests and engagement activities. The aim should be to inform university students and other academic parties about space-exploration activities, inspire them and involve them in ESA s activities through different forms of contribution and participation. The ESA Moon Challenge also demonstrated that there is a high level of expectation from a new generation of space explorers. They would like to see space agencies make significant progress towards implementing a significant international programme of lunar exploration. 7

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Strategic value of cis-lunar space There is a broad international consensus regarding the high strategic value and benefit of investment in cislunar infrastructure as an intermediate step towards sustainable human lunar surface access and missions to more distant destinations. Make maximum use of lunar orbit infrastructure already planned by agencies to advance lunar exploration goals. Partnerships Some elements of exploration-enabling infrastructure and services may be best delivered by the private sector, allowing agencies to focus on enabling strategic technologies and infrastructure addressing scientific questions. The private sector is ready to invest and requires commitments from governments to ensure that a market exists. One of the goals of lunar exploration is to prepare the international partnership s capabilities for a future journey to Mars. Work with the private sector to establish areas where commercial services can improve efficiency and provide the programmatic certainties to unlock private investments. Use missions to the Moon for demonstrating Partner capabilities and roles critical for enabling human missions to Mars. Mission scenarios Robotic missions to the lunar surface should be implemented in the early 2020 s. These surface missions should be coordinated internationally to ensure that a maximum benefit is derived for human missions, for example by returning pristine samples obtained by robotic missions with the crew. Once an infrastructure is in place near the Moon, precursors to human visits to the lunar surface can include teleoperations of assets on the surface like proposed in the frame of the HERACLES architecture. HERACLEStype approaches are suitable for the final step before human missions to the surface, building confidence in operations, technology, and international partnerships. Using local resources on the lunar surface is expected to be important for lunar exploration and exploration to more distant destinations. Cold-trapped volatiles have been confirmed and need to be investigated through a sequence of surface missions to establish their viability for harvesting. Other resources exist that need to be characterised, too. The investigation of volatile deposits also increases the understanding of Solar System processes. Current remote-sensing data are sufficient for detailed planning of surface missions. Given the quality of existing orbital measurements, newer high-resolution orbital data could provide valuable information but are not required for future surface missions. Invest in near-term surface missions with an emphasis on scientific research, resource prospecting at several location, and relevant technology demonstrations. Consider the accessibility of local resources as part of exploration roadmaps. The topics are listed in no particular order 8

Vision Building on the Global Exploration Roadmap, an international vision for a scenario and architecture by 2030 is needed to guide near-term investments by agencies and the private sector. The areas invested in need to be coordinated at international level along with defining standards to allow interoperability. The participants positively received the ESA Director General s vision of a lunar village. Coordinate plans and investments at international level to provide a vision for lunar exploration after 2030 and a coordinated approach for the 2020-2030 period. Scientific Opportunities Lunar exploration offers tremendous opportunities for scientific research across multiple disciplines, through early precursors followed by an increasingly comprehensive and integrated exploration architecture. If these opportunities are to be realised then the requirements and expectations of scientific users need to be considered from the outset and appropriate investments made. Collaborate with the scientific community throughout the process to ensure that exploration strategies will yield key data regarding the geologic evolution of the Moon, and all terrestrial planets that cannot be obtained elsewhere. The collaboration should also consider the establishment of unique astrophysical observatories on the lunar far side, as well as opportunities for investigations in life science. Technologies The technologies presented in the ESA Technology Roadmap cover what is required to engage in an effective Space Exploration Programme. Careful planning is required to guarantee availability for missions while minimising risks for technologies with a long development time. Quantitative research into the engineering aspects of teleoperations is required, as well as effective teleoperations procedures for scientific research, lunar resource development, and the building and maintenance of surface infrastructure. Resource extraction, processing, and utilisation, as well as autonomous power sources for vehicles on cold, dark planetary surfaces are less strongly covered in the technology roadmap and require additional attention by technology planners. Prioritise research into enabling technologies: Navigation sensors and control for rendezvous and surface operations with an emphasis on lightweight, efficient navigation systems for human and human-robotic integrated systems Propulsion systems - in particular, in Europe, the high-thrust chemical propulsion systems, but also other approaches to efficient chemical propulsion. Power and thermal systems for cold, dark destinations (e.g. the lunar poles or Mars), such as radio-thermal generators and fission power Teleoperations and shared autonomy as an operational concept for exploration 9

Benefits Human lunar exploration has broad societal benefits through public engagement, inspiration and education, leveraging on from the Moon s unique cultural significance and proximity. Evidence from previous studies of the socioeconomic benefits of general investments in space suggest that specific investments in lunar exploration will deliver not only unprecedented scientific opportunities, but also broad economic returns which are beyond the direct and indirect returns on investment. Continue to consider, analyse, document, and communicate broader societal benefits related to economics, public engagement and education from the outset and ensure that plans are made which account for these. Core message to agencies Together, grow towards sustainable and affordable human lunar exploration for the benefit of science, economy, and society by implementing missions of increasing capability and without artificial barriers between exploration communities. The decade 2020 2030 lays the foundation for human exploration of the Moon. The participants support space agencies making significant progress towards implementing a significant international programme of lunar exploration. 10

OUTLOOK Building on the momentum generated by the symposium, several partners and agencies have initiated activities that will advance the common findings and implement the recommendations. Informed by the input received at the symposium, existing international coordination bodies are working on a common vision for the cis-lunar habitat as an international gateway to the horizon goal of sending humans to the surface of Mars. The vision accommodates different pathways towards that goal. Many agencies are in the process of prioritising their engagement in technology developments required for exploration missions beyond low Earth orbit. This process benefits from the discussions among the academic, industrial and private sector as well as space agencies and the political community that met at the symposium. A common, coordinated approach to developing key enabling technologies is recommended. These technologies include highthrust propulsion and navigation for landing, ascent, and rendezvous, surface power in cold and dark environments and high-bandwidth delay-tolerant space-to-space communications. The discussions at the symposium resulted in clear goals for technology and operations preparation and for applied and fundamental science to be done from the surface of the Moon. Ultimately, the coordination of precursor scenarios will culminate in a simplified, affordable approach to prepare for human missions to the surface of the Moon. Robust cargo and logistics service International Lunar Communication Service Multiple options for crew access and return International Gateway Human access and return capability with re-usable ascent element International automated access and sample return capability with re-usable ascent element Long range pressurised rover Long range tele-operated surface rover 11

CONTACT ESA/ESTEC explorationstrategy@esa.int An ESA Human Spaceflight and Robotics Exploration production Copyright 2016 European Space Agency