Lab 2: Common Emitter Design: Part 2

Similar documents
Experiment #8: Designing and Measuring a Common-Collector Amplifier

2. SINGLE STAGE BIPOLAR JUNCTION TRANSISTOR (BJT) AMPLIFIERS

UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA EE 206

Experiment #7: Designing and Measuring a Common-Emitter Amplifier

E84 Lab 3: Transistor

Experiment #6: Biasing an NPN BJT Introduction to CE, CC, and CB Amplifiers

Experiment 6: Biasing Circuitry

Experiment 6: Biasing Circuitry

EXPERIMENT 10: SINGLE-TRANSISTOR AMPLIFIERS 11/11/10

Experiment No. 9 DESIGN AND CHARACTERISTICS OF COMMON BASE AND COMMON COLLECTOR AMPLIFIERS

Lab 2: Common Base Common Collector Design Exercise

FREQUENCY RESPONSE OF COMMON COLLECTOR AMPLIFIER

Integrators, differentiators, and simple filters

UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHARLOTTE Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering

Page 1 of 7. Power_AmpFal17 11/7/ :14

The George Washington University School of Engineering and Applied Science Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering ECE 20 - LAB

Experiment 8 Frequency Response

ECE 2201 PRELAB 6 BJT COMMON EMITTER (CE) AMPLIFIER

Revised: January 26,

Homework Assignment 12

7. Bipolar Junction Transistor

ECEN 325 Lab 11: MOSFET Amplifier Configurations

Chapter 6. BJT Amplifiers

Lab 4. Transistor as an amplifier, part 2

EE 330 Laboratory 8 Discrete Semiconductor Amplifiers

Prelab 10: Differential Amplifiers

Lab 2: Discrete BJT Op-Amps (Part I)

Frequency Response of Common Emitter Amplifier

5.25Chapter V Problem Set

Well we know that the battery Vcc must be 9V, so that is taken care of.

I1 19u 5V R11 1MEG IDC Q7 Q2N3904 Q2N3904. Figure 3.1 A scaled down 741 op amp used in this lab

EXPERIMENT 5 CURRENT AND VOLTAGE CHARACTERISTICS OF BJT

University of Michigan EECS 311: Electronic Circuits Fall 2008 LAB 4 SINGLE STAGE AMPLIFIER

EXPT NO: 1.A. COMMON EMITTER AMPLIFIER (Software) PRELAB:

The George Washington University School of Engineering and Applied Science Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering ECE 20 - LAB

PHYSICS 330 LAB Operational Amplifier Frequency Response

Prelab 6: Biasing Circuitry

UNIVERSITY OF UTAH ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT

BJT Characteristics & Common Emitter Transistor Amplifier

EE 330 Laboratory 8 Discrete Semiconductor Amplifiers

Objectives The purpose of this lab is build and analyze Differential amplifier based on NPN transistors.

Experiment 9- Single Stage Amplifiers with Passive Loads - MOS

EXPERIMENT 10: SINGLE-TRANSISTOR AMPLIFIERS 10/27/17

ECE 3274 Common-Collector (Emitter-Follower) Amplifier Project

EE 3111 Lab 7.1. BJT Amplifiers

Designing an Audio Amplifier Using a Class B Push-Pull Output Stage

ECE 310L : LAB 9. Fall 2012 (Hay)

ECE3204 D2015 Lab 1. See suggested breadboard configuration on following page!

ANALOG FUNDAMENTALS C. Topic 4 BASIC FET AMPLIFIER CONFIGURATIONS

Experiment 8 - Single Stage Amplifiers with Passive Loads - BJT

Lab 2 Operational Amplifier

Lab Experiment #2 Differential Amplifiers. Group Members

Physics 623 Transistor Characteristics and Single Transistor Amplifier Sept. 12, 2017

Module 4 Unit 4 Feedback in Amplifiers

DC Bias. Graphical Analysis. Script

Common-Source Amplifiers

Linear electronic. Lecture No. 1

15EEE282 Electronic Circuits and Simulation Lab - I Lab # 6

A 3-STAGE 5W AUDIO AMPLIFIER

4 Transistors. 4.1 IV Relations

3-Stage Transimpedance Amplifier

.dc Vcc Ib 0 50uA 5uA

Lab 3: BJT Digital Switch

ECE 3274 Common-Emitter Amplifier Project

LABORATORY MODULE. Analog Electronics. Semester 2 (2005/2006)

Document Name: Electronic Circuits Lab. Facebook: Twitter:

Experiment 8&9 BJT AMPLIFIER

BME 3512 Bioelectronics Laboratory Two - Passive Filters

ECE4902 C Lab 7

CHARACTERIZATION OF OP-AMP

FREQUENCY RESPONSE OF COMMON COLLECTOR AMPLIFIER

UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHARLOTTE Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering

EE 2274 DIODE OR GATE & CLIPPING CIRCUIT

I C I E =I B = I C 1 V BE 0.7 V

ESE 319 MT Review

EE 233 Circuit Theory Lab 3: First-Order Filters

Electronic Devices. Floyd. Chapter 9. Ninth Edition. Electronic Devices, 9th edition Thomas L. Floyd

THE UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG. Department of Electrical and Electrical Engineering

In a cascade configuration, the overall voltage and current gains are given by:

Small signal ac equivalent circuit of BJT

Chapter 13 Output Stages and Power Amplifiers

EE 210 Lab Exercise #5: OP-AMPS I

Lab 2: Diode Characteristics and Diode Circuits

ANALOG ELECTRONIC CIRCUITS LABORATORY MANUAL (CODE: EEE - 228)

Theory: The idea of this oscillator comes from the idea of positive feedback, which is described by Figure 6.1. Figure 6.1: Positive Feedback

EK307 Active Filters and Steady State Frequency Response

Chapter 6: Transistors and Gain

In-Class Exercises for Lab 2: Input and Output Impedance

ECE 3274 Common-Emitter Amplifier Project

BJT Fundamentals and Applications JOR

SAMPLE FINAL EXAMINATION FALL TERM

Common-source Amplifiers

Transmit filter designs for ADSL modems

BJT AC Analysis CHAPTER OBJECTIVES 5.1 INTRODUCTION 5.2 AMPLIFICATION IN THE AC DOMAIN

CIRCUIT DIAGRAM Half Wave Rectifier. Half Wave Rectifier with filter 2012/ODD/III/ECE/EC I/LM 1

Massachusetts Institute of Technology Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Circuits & Electronics Spring 2005

TTL LOGIC and RING OSCILLATOR TTL

Dr. Charles Kim ELECTRONICS I. Lab 6 Bipolar Junction Transistor (BJT) II TRADITIONAL LAB

LABORATORY 5 v3 OPERATIONAL AMPLIFIER

EQUIVALENT EQUIPMENT CIRCUITS

Transcription:

Lab 2: Common Emitter Design: Part 2 ELE 344 University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI 02881-0805, U.S.A. 1 Linearity in High Gain Amplifiers The common emitter amplifier, shown in figure 1, will provide an equivalent linear circuit for small ac signals; however, if the gain is high then the linearity of the highest output signal levels must be measured. VCC V CC R S R 1 R C C 2 V i R 2 C 1 R E Q 1 C E R L V o Figure 1. Common Emitter Amplifier. The problem is that the operating point is set by the DC values of I C, V CE and V BE. The operating point is expected to remain constant over the entire range of ac signal voltages at the output of the amplifier. In order to understand how this works we must have a look at the total voltage between the collector and the emitter. The total voltage (ac and DC) is given by v CE (t) = V CE v ce (t) (1) where V CE is the DC voltage between the collector and the emitter, v ce (t) is the ac signal voltage between collector and the emitter, and v CE (t), is the sum of the two voltages. 1 Tel: (401) 874-5482; fax: (401) 782-6422; e-mail: davis@ele.uri.edu ELE 344 Spring 2009 1 February 2009

The amplifier in figure 1 is generally a non-linear device; however, linear operation is expected if v CE V CE or V CE {v ce } peak. If this approximation does not hold then the collector current will change as the input signal changes during the ac cycle. Once this occurs then the operation will become nonlinear. 2 Quantifying Nonlinearity Linearity assumes that the relation between the output voltage and the input voltage is given by the following relation: v o (t) = A VS v s (t) (2) where v o (t) is the output voltage, v s (t) is the input from the source and A VS is the voltage gain with respect to the signal source. If the system is linear then A VS will remain constant over ALL input voltage levels. The graph, {v o (t)} peak vs. {v s } peak would be a straight line. Unfortunately, the voltage gain for the amplifier shown in figure 1 is only linear over a small range of ac input voltages. This means that A VS is a constant for only a small range of input voltages. Thus, a linear voltage gain is a reasonable approximation as long as V CE {v ce (t)} peak (e.g. the ac signal voltage is much smaller than the DC bias voltage). There are many methods which can be used for quantifying linearity. One method is to observe the input and output signals with an oscilloscope. Nonlinearity can be detected once the shape of the output signal, a sine wave for instance, becomes distorted. The drawback with this method is that it is difficult to detect a distorted waveform with an oscilloscope in the early stages of nonlinear operation. A second method is to use an analog or a digital spectrum analyzer. These are probably the most accurate and common methods used to make a direct measurement of distortion. There is a third method, one can measure the peak positive ac amplitude and the peak negative ac amplitude for the input and output signals. This allows one to measure the actual gain for the positive swing and the negative swing of an output signal. The amplifier gain at the peak positive and peak negative swings will be equal in a linear system; however, these values will differ for small signal levels in a high gain amplifier. In order to measure the linear gain of an amplifier, the output signal must be very small. For the system which you were required to design in the previous lab the gain should have been at least 100. This means that you will need to generate ac output signal levels much less than 1V peak in order to determine the effective gain. Then the input signal level will need to be increased from that point until the measured gain is no longer constant. 2

3 Measuring Nonlinearity The two tools you have to perform this measurement are the SPICE simulator in MultiSim and the bread-boarded circuit. Transient analysis is required for the SPICE simulator; this requires that an input sine wave is generated in SPICE, passed through the amplifier, and then measured at the output. Thus, in MultiSim, you will: 1) Measure v s (t) at the positive and negative peak voltages. 2) Measure v o (t) at the positive and negative peak voltages. 3) Compute A vs, the ratio of the output voltage to the source voltage. The same steps will be followed for your breadboard circuit. There are some practical problems. For the amplifier shown in figure 1 with a gain of 100, you will want the first peak values of v o (t) to be no greater than several hundred mv s. This means that the input signal level must be 100 less!! While this is not difficult to do in a SPICE simulator, you do want to reproduce these results on your breadboard circuit. The problem with the breadboard is the signal generators. Most of the signal generators used in our labs will not allow one to reliably produce sine waves with amplitudes of 1mV or less. This is also difficult to measure directly with an oscilloscope. You will need to create a source which divides the output voltage by a large value but maintains an equivalent resistance of 300Ω in order to comply with the requirements for R S. The source in figure 2 will produce a small Thevenin Equivalent voltage if R S1 R S2. If R S2 in figure 2 is set to R S in figure 1, and R S1 R S2, then an equivalent signal source can be realized. R S1 1 R S2 Figure 2. Modified signal source. 3

4 Lab Description Using the method described in the previous sections measure the linearity of your amplifier design from Lab1 using the SPICE simulator in MultiSim and the bread-boarded circuit. 1) Using the method described in the previous sections measure the linearity of your amplifier design from Lab1 using the SPICE simulator in MultiSim and the bread-boarded circuit. 2) Select R S1 values of 1MΩ, 100kΩ and 10kΩ. Find an expression for v s (t) as a function of v 1 s(t) and your effective source resistance, R S as a function of R S1 and R S2. Note that R S = 300Ω!! 3) Measure and record the values of each resistor, e.g. the 1MΩ, 100kΩ and 10kΩ resistors used for R S1 and R S2. Compute the effective R S (for each R S1 value). 4) Record the values of v s (t) and v o (t) for each sinusoidal input voltage for both positive and negative peak voltage levels. 5) Estimate the linear voltage swing of your amplifier. 6) Redesign your amplifier; this time set the DC operating point for 1.5mA and recompute the values of R 1, R 2 and R E. Set V CC = 15V and select an appropriate value for R C. 7) Verify the operating point for a range of β DC values. 8) Compute the amplifier gain and input impedance. 9) Verify the operating point using the SPICE simulator in MultiSim. 10) Add a resistor, R x, with a value of approximately 160Ω. Connect R x as shown in figure 3. 11) Find the new value of I C. 12) Find the ac equivalent small signal model for the amplifier in figure 3. 13) Compute g m & r π. 14) Find an expression for A Vin, A VS and Z in. 4

VCC V CC R 1 R C C 2 R S V i C 1 R 2 R E Q 1 C E R L V o R x Figure 3. Modified Common Emitter Amplifier. 15) Compute these values and verify them using the SPICE simulator in MultiSim. 16) Measure the linearity of the amplifier in figure 3 using the SPICE simulator in MultiSim and the bread-boarded circuit. 5 Write Up Include the following results in your write up: 1) Record the values of the resistors from steps 2 and 3. 2) Record the expressions for v s (t) as a function of vs 1 (t) and your effective source resistance, R S as a function of R S1 and R S2. Note that R S = 300Ω!! 3) Estimate the effective value of R S for each resistor used in the voltage divider, using R S1 and R S2. 4) Create a table with 3 columns, {v 1 s(t)} peak, {v o (t)} peak, and A VS ; remember to record the positive and negative peak values. 5) Plot {v o (t)} peak vs. {v 1 s(t)} peak using the measured values; overlay this plot with the line used from the small input voltages used to estimate the actual amplifier gain. For the second part of this lab with the amplifier in figure 3: 5

1) Record the steps used in your design. 2) Record the values of R 1, R 2, R E and R C. 3) Show your work for the computed I C vs. β DC. 4) Record the computed values for g m and r π. 5) Show your expressions for A Vin, A VS and Z in ; also show the computed values. 6) Create a table with 3 columns, {v 1 s(t)} peak, {v o (t)} peak, and A VS ; remember to record the positive and negative peak values. 7) Plot {v o (t)} peak vs. {v 1 s(t)} peak using the measured values; overlay this plot with the line used from the small input voltages used to estimate the actual amplifier gain. Compare the two amplifiers, your design of the amplifier in figure 1 and the amplifier designed using the schematic in figure 3. Answer the following questions: 1) Does the inclusion of the resistor, R x, improve the overall linearity? 2) What is the cost of adding R x? 3) Would you expect that A Vin, that is the voltage with respect to V in (or V i in the schematics) will also change when A VS is changing? 4) Does it seem possible to have a peak output voltage swing of 3V for either amplifier topology? 6