NASA Mars Exploration Program Update to the Planetary Science Subcommittee

Similar documents
Planetary Protection Subcommittee Mars Brief May 1, 2012 Doug McCuistion Director, Mars Exploration Program

Lisa Pratt, MEPAG Chair Report to PSS March 10-11, 2016

Decadal Survey Process and Mars Program Introduction

The Mars Exploration Program

Planetary CubeSats, nanosatellites and sub-spacecraft: are we all talking about the same thing?

U.S. Space Exploration in the Next 20 NASA Space Sciences Policy

NASA s Space Launch System: Powering the Journey to Mars. FISO Telecon Aug 3, 2016

The Application of SE Methodologies to the design and development of a Space Telescope

Meeting the Challenge of Low Cost Lunar Exploration

Daring Mighty Things. AFCEA Los Angeles. Larry James (Lt. Gen. USAF, Ret.), Deputy Director. a presentation to. January 14, 2015

The Global Exploration Roadmap International Space Exploration Coordination Group (ISECG)

HEOMD Update NRC Aeronautics and Space Engineering Board Oct. 16, 2014

Jet Propulsion Laboratory

Voyage to Mars Space Simulation

Space Technology FY 2013

The Lunar Exploration Campaign

NASA Mission Directorates

Asteroid Redirect Mission (ARM) Update to the Small Bodies Assessment Group

Heading back to Mars with a thermal control system developed using NX

NASA s X2000 Program - an Institutional Approach to Enabling Smaller Spacecraft

JPL. Heading back to Mars with thermal control system developed using NX. Aerospace. Product NX

A RENEWED SPIRIT OF DISCOVERY

Dream Chaser Frequently Asked Questions

Exploration Systems Research & Technology

Mars Exploration Program Status Planetary Sciences Subcommittee of NAC 9 July 2009 Doug McCuistion Mars Exploration Program, Director

Status and Outlook for the European Exploration Envelope Programme

Planetary Science Division Update

Human Spaceflight: The Ultimate Team Activity

ESA Human Spaceflight Capability Development and Future Perspectives International Lunar Conference September Toronto, Canada

Exploration Systems Mission Directorate: New Opportunities in the President s FY2011 Budget

Future DSN Capabilities

RETURN TO THE LUNAR SURFACE Lunar Exploration Campaign. Next COTS Project?

When Failure Means Success: Accepting Risk in Aerospace Projects NASA Project Management Challenge 2009

PACE Science Definition Team Kickoff Meeting. Paula Bontempi, Betsy Edwards, Eric Ianson, Hal Maring, Woody

SPACE STUDIES BOARD MEETING NASA Science Overview. Thomas H. Zurbuchen Associate Administrator Science Mission Directorate,

Call for Ideas. for the Next Exploration Science and Technology Mission of the European Space Exploration Programme - Aurora

MAVEN continues Mars exploration begun 50 years ago by Mariner 4 5 November 2014, by Bob Granath

Technology Capabilities and Gaps Roadmap

Lunar Exploration Science Campaign: A commercial-leveraged lunar mission program

Perspectives on human and robotic spaceflight. Steve Squyres Chairman, NASA Advisory Council Cornell University

Space Challenges Preparing the next generation of explorers. The Program

Outpost Optimizing Science & Exploration Working Group (OSEWG) - Lunar Surface Science Scenarios

The NASA-ESA Comparative Architecture Assessment (CAA)

A TECHNOLOGY ROADMAP TOWARDS MINERAL EXPLORATION FOR EXTREME ENVIRONMENTS IN SPACE

Uranus Exploration Challenges

Constellation Systems Division

Office of Chief Technologist - Space Technology Program Dr. Prasun Desai Office of the Chief Technologist May 1, 2012

NASA Earth Science Division Status and Decadal Survey Thoughts Michael H. Freilich

MSL Lessons Learned Study. Presentation to NAC Planetary Protection Subcommittee April 29, 2013 Mark Saunders, Study Lead

Planetary Science Sub-committee Meeting. 9 July

WHO WE ARE: Private U.S. citizens who advocate at our own expense for a bold and well-reasoned space agenda worthy of the U.S.

NASA s Human Space Exploration Capability Driven Framework

Asteroid Redirect Mission and Human Exploration. William H. Gerstenmaier NASA Associate Administrator for Human Exploration and Operations

Technology Capabilities and Gaps Roadmap

NASA and Earth Science Enterprise Overview

The NASA-ESA. Comparative Architecture Assessment

A RENEWED SPIRIT OF DISCOVERY

The Global Exploration Roadmap

The Global Exploration Roadmap

NOAA Satellite and Information Service

An Explore Mars BE BOLD technical project. Sanford Morton Emily Briere Cassidy Chan

NASA s Exploration Plans and The Lunar Architecture

Planetary Protection at NASA: Overview and Status

The JPL A-Team and Mission Formulation Process

Community Perspective: GeoSpace Observations and Analysis

NASA Office of the Chief Technologist

Space Technology Mission Directorate. NASA's Role in Small Spacecraft Technologies: Today and in the Future

The International Lunar Network (ILN) and the US Anchor Nodes mission

John P. Holdren, Director, Office of Science and Technology Policy

National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Space Challenges Preparing the next generation of explorers. The Program

Thomas H. Zurbuchen Associate

Low-Cost Innovation in the U.S. Space Program: A Brief History

Understand that technology has different levels of maturity and that lower maturity levels come with higher risks.

Lecture 27: The Future of Space Exploration

chairs IEEE EMC symposium technical sessions. He is often tutorial workshops and technical demonstrations at IEEE EMC international symposiums.

European Space Agency Aurora European Space Exploration Programme EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Cover. DLR-ESA Workshop on ARTES-11. SGEO: Implementation of of Artes-11. Dr. Andreas Winkler

Overview of Recent CAPS Meeting. Christopher House Bill McKinnon. CAPS Co-chairs. SSB Meeting May 2, 2016

Science Plenary II: Science Missions Enabled by Nuclear Power and Propulsion. Chair / Organizer: Steven D. Howe Center for Space Nuclear Research

Chapter 6. Technology Development Options

ExoMars and Beyond. Thales Alenia Space. Feb 28th, 9:00 AM. Follow this and additional works at:

MISSION TO MARS: A Project Management Retrospective Analysis

C. R. Weisbin, R. Easter, G. Rodriguez January 2001

ARMADILLO: Subsystem Booklet

IAC-13-A THE ISECG GLOBAL EXPLORATION ROADMAP: STRENGTHENING EXPLORATION THROUGH INCREASED HUMAN ROBOTIC PARTNERSHIP

Ocean Worlds Robert D. Braun

Analysis of European Architectures for Space Exploration

NASA Ground and Launch Systems Processing Technology Area Roadmap

Innovation Needs Support: Two Examples of German Support Strategy in Satcom

A DEEP SPACE COMPANY BY A WORLD TEAM THE FED EXPRESS OF THE 21ST CENTURY TONY SPEAR OCTOBER 2007

Reducing the Challenges Posed by Titan Missions

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

Dan Dvorak and Lorraine Fesq Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology. Jonathan Wilmot NASA Goddard Space Flight Center

NOAA Satellite Observing System Architecture (NSOSA) Study Update

Model-based Systems Engineering Mission Formulation and Implementation

Red Dragon. Feasibility of a Dragon-derived Mars lander for scientific and human-precursor missions. May 7, 2013

For Winter /12/2006

NASA Space Exploration 1 st Year Report

Here s some of what I wrote in 2013:

Transcription:

NASA Mars Exploration Program Update to the Planetary Science Subcommittee Jim Watzin Director MEP March 9, 2016

The state-of-the-mep today Our operational assets remain healthy and productive: MAVEN has successfully completed its prime science mission and is now continuing investigations in an extended mission Odyssey, our oldest Mars asset, continues to be healthy and contribute thermal imagery and data relay services MRO continues to provide invaluable reconnaissance imaging and mineralogical mapping, supporting science investigations, rover operations, and exploring potential human landing sites Opportunity continues to provide important ground truth data, recently scaling 30 deg slopes of Knudsen Ridge atop the southern flank of Marathon Valley, to investigate red zones Curiosity continues exploring Gale Crater, generating important insights into Martian chemistry Mars Express continues operating our collaborative deep radar sounder (MARSIS) M2020 development on-track and proceeding well: PDR successfully completed Feb 2016 Heritage H/W fabrication underway; some delivered Sampling system development labs up and running We are meeting our foreign commitments: Our two Electra payloads on the TGO are ready for flight MOMA is proceeding in development for the ExoMars Lander Financially, the program is doing well: This fiscal year all our planned activities are funded Earlier this month the President's FY17 budget was released and Mars fared well again, supporting our development, operational, and future mission activities Overall, the state-of-the-mep is good 2/17/16 2

M2020 Mission Overview M2020 mission elements 3

M2020 Project Status Summary The Mars 2020 Project has conducted successfully the lower level instrument, subsystem, and Office level PDR s necessary to provide confidence in a full understanding of the requirements, design response, and associated cost estimates Cost estimates for new developments, particularly the instrument payload and SCS, include acceptable financial and schedule margins to support a 2020 launch The Mars 2020 Project has conducted successfully the mission system PDR Cost performance on heritage HW continues to perform under plan Project is progressing on-schedule within cost target 4

PSS Findings from the October 5-6, 2015 re: Mars Orbiter FINDING - Preliminary information from a MEPAG science analysis group that studied functions for a Mars 2022 orbiter to be inserted into the overall plans for Mars exploration indicates a large and complex mission set merging goals of human exploration, technology demonstration, and planetary science. Coordination across multiple NASA Directorates will be necessary for funding the proposed mission architecture without placing an undue burden on other Planetary Science missions. At the next meeting of the PSS, we would like to hear details about the anticipated funding wedge and management plan for the currently envisioned set of highly collaborative missions on the path to humans at Mars. RESPONSE - While supportive of cross-directorate collaboration preparing for NASA s Journey to Mars, the President s FY2017 Budget provided funding to SMD to lead early work on a future Mars Orbiter focused on ensuring continuity of data relay capabilities for future Mars missions Recognizing the strong need for such capability, MEP is targeting the earliest launch opportunity Owing to the potential for substantial cost efficiency, formulation studies will consider enhancing the orbiter with scientific and exploration capabilities as has been our history, consistent with approved mission budget

2/17/16 Pre-Decisional - For Planning and Discussion Purposes Only 6?

Operating At and Around Mars 20 Operating Time at Mars (years) 15 10 5 Mariner 9 Viking Orbiters Viking Landers Pathfinder MGS Odyssey Opportunity Spirit MRO Phoenix Curiosity MAVEN 1970 1975 1995 2000 2005 2010 Arrival at Mars 2015 MEP has operated successfully and with longevity, but our infrastructure is aging, placing the decade of the 2020s at risk 2/17/16 7

Strategic View Forward US National Research Council (NRC) Planetary Science Decadal Survey (2012) gave the highest priority to elements of the Mars Sample Return Campaign The Mars 2020 mission and its payload begin this process with the characterization of a site and the careful selection and documentation of a suite of samples acquired and encapsulated for return The President s NASA Budget Request for FY2017 provides $10M to begin early work on a future Mars orbiter missions beyond 2020 with an emphasis on emplacing the infrastructure for the next decade MEP planning strives to integrate these realities into a viable plan for the future 2/17/16 8

Next Orbiter Can Provide Capabilities that enable Many Future Pathways Infrastructure Continuity Next Mars Orbiter Decadal Priorities The Future Aging Orbiter Missions Resource Prospecting for future Landing Sites On-going and future Surface Missions need orbital support Timely Renewal and Enhancement of Infrastructure is needed to Support Future Missions 2/17/16 9

Desired Orbiter Capabilities Renew and Update Aging Communications Infrastructure Essential to the future of Mars exploration; Laying the foundation for missions to come, while supporting ongoing missions in the early 2020 s Provide Continuity of High Resolution Imaging Scientific Investigations for Landing Site Certification Essential Orbital Support for Sample Return Potential Resource Prospecting for future Landing Sites and Exploration planning Continuity of Relevant Remote Sensing 2/17/16 10

Building from a Modest (Discovery-Class) Core Vehicle Many examples exist of architecturally flexible and adaptable spacecraft capable of supporting this mission Provide Core Technical Functionality Capable of Operating in Deep Space Long Lifetime Autonomous Operations 3-axis pointing for imaging and communications Adaptable to Solar Electric Propulsion, providing mission flexibility Lowest cost launch vehicle Increased mass delivery capability Return to Earth capability Deep Impact DAWN MAVEN 2/17/16 11

Notional Orbiter Project Lifecycle Planning Timeline Phase A start in 2017 is essential, given that an orbiter arriving at Mars at the earliest opportunity would join Odyssey in its 22 nd year of service and MRO in its 18 th 2/17/16 12

Next Steps Path to Orbiter Phase A Establish Partnerships Prepare for MCR Concept Refinement Communication with imewg and MEPAG communities Explore potential International & Commercial Partnerships by May 2016 Establish baseline project architecture Establish key partnerships Refine technical trades Conduct ORDT, identify opportunities to openly compete selected instrumentation Summer 2016 Detailed spacecraft studies, assess available aerospace capabilities Proceed with Phase A implementation Fall 2016+ ORDT (Objectives & Requirements Definition Team) 2/17/16 13

View from our Journey to the Foothills of Mount Sharp compliments of Curiosity rover - Sept 2015