VISUAL INSPECTION CHECKLIST FOR GENERAL NPDES PERMIT FOR STORMWATER DISCHARGES ASSOCIATED WITH CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES (PAG-02)

Similar documents
Section 1. Introduction

CONSTRUCTION CERTIFICATION PACKAGE

City of Massillon Site Plan Checklist

GCG ASSOCIATES, INC. February 8, Mr. Nathaniel Strosberg, Town Planner 101 Main Street Town of Ashland Ashland, MA 01721

Documents: Response letter and attachments, Prepared by: AMEC Massachusetts, Inc., Dated February 17, 2016.

Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC. Response to Technical Deficiency Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection

SECTION 58 PRECAST CONCRETE BOX CULVERT. This work consists of furnishing and installing Pre-cast Concrete Box Culverts.

Stormwater & Water Quality Training Programs for Colorado

Grading, Erosion and Sediment Control (GESC) Checklist

MSD STANDARD DRAWINGS LOUISVILLE AND JEFFERSON COUNTY METROPOLITAN SEWER DISTRICT 700 WEST LIBERTY STREET LOUISVILLE, KENTUCKY

MULTIPLE-FAMILY DESIGN REVIEW SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST

MILL HILL ARTS VILLAGE

VICINITY MAP LOCATION MAP GRAPHIC SCALES

A. Dewatering observation wells are part of dewatering allowance.

APPENDIX K DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND CODE ENFORCEMENT SUBDIVISION APPLICATION CENTER SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST

SECTION DEWATERING PART 1 - GENERAL 1.1 RELATED DOCUMENTS

B422 - PRECAST REINFORCED CONCRETE BOX CULVERTS AND BOX SEWERS - OPSS 422

CITY OF TUMWATER 555 ISRAEL RD. SW, TUMWATER, WA (360)

Authorized Agent: City of Manassas Check List Attached: Contact: Address: Phone Number: Fax Number: Developer s Name: Phone Number:

Attachment A Construction Inspection Log (Required for initial certification of stormwater treatment facilities)

Pipe Product Catalog Table of Contents

Part 1 - Common Comments on Erosion and Sediment Control Plans (Walter Hamilton, SDID)

Minor Site Plan Application and Checklist Land Disturbing Activities

SECTION DEWATERING TANKAGE PART 1 - GENERAL 1.1 RELATED DOCUMENTS

SUBDIVISION APPLICATION FOR DRT SUBMITTAL PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT

Porter County Plan Commission

VARIANCE APPLICATION (NO SITE PLAN OR SUBDIVISION)

TOWN OF DOUGLAS EARTH REMOVAL SPECIAL PERMIT APPLICATION FORM Pursuant to Section 6.1 of the Douglas Zoning Bylaw

Essential Skills: Reading and Interpreting Maps and Plans

PO Box 1089 Apex NC

SUMMIT COUNTY PLANNING AND ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT

APPENDIX 4. Checklists. Township of King Design Criteria and Standard Detail Drawings

MINOR SUBDIVISION. [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] B. Dimensions, bearings and curve data for all property lines and easements.

b. Building Areas or Building Pads having an average grade steeper than 5% (some elevation information may be required to verify grade).

Information for File # RMM

CITY OF DANA POINT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW

SECTION MANHOLES

ATTACHMENT H TACOMA HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT FEATURES

DESIGN GUIDELINES (SD) COUNTY OF ALAMEDA PUBLIC WORKS AGENCY 399 ELMHURST STREET HAYWARD, CA

STORM M ANHOLE FOR 42" PIPE AND SM ALLER JOB NO. SHEET NO. DATE MARCH 2015 OF MIN OF 3 CRSES MAX OF 5 CRSES 30"MAX 3 OR 3.5 PRECAST ECCENTIC CONC

STANDARD CATCH BASIN GUTTER LINE CB INLET FRAME & GRATE, GROUTED TO GRADE RINGS AS REQ'D CONCRETE CURB FINISHED GRADE ASPHALT MAX 50 MIN

CHAPTER 11. Plan Standards

SECTION 100 PRELIMINARY CONSIDERATIONS & INSTRUCTIONS

Subdivision Application Checklist

STANDARD BID ITEM NUMBERS

DECK PERMIT APPLICATION PACKET

Anne Arundel County Dept. of Inspections and Permits Storm Drain Checklist

MAJOR GRADING PLAN CHECKLIST

Before you begin. Rain Barrel Building Instructions

ROUTES: 65 SECTIONS: miles in length. THE FOLLOWING ITEMS AND APPROXIMATE QUANTITIES ARE INVOLVED:

King And Queen County, VA P.O. Box 177 King and Queen Courthouse, VA (804) (804) (fax)

11/06/2014 Pay Items - 1

SEWER CORRECTION SHEET

Town of Westlake Construction Plans Review Checklist

CHECKLIST THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION AND DOCUMENTATION MUST BE SUBMITTED TO DEVELOPMENT SERVICES BEFORE YOUR APPLICATION CAN BE PROCESSED.

Phone Number: Address:

Town of Apex, North Carolina

erosion control HasTec KGW 400 advantages: usage: For surface protection and greening of slopes in landscaping and traffic route engineering.

Slope analysis & Grading. Earth shape and earthwork Topographic map Slope form Slope analysis Grading

PART 4 STANDARD DRAWINGS FOR CONSTRUCTION

DETAIL CROFT FARM OUTBUILDING RESTORATION TOWNSHIP OF CHERRY HILL, NEW JERSEY

Government Of Newfoundland & Labrador Municipal Water, Sewer And Roads Master Construction Specifications

SECTION MANHOLES

Ecological Restoration Drafting & Design Guidelines

I. GENERAL: The Bidding and Contract Documents for Riverside North Parking Lot are modified as described in this Addendum.

MAY J. Collins Engineering Associates, LLC San Jose Blvd. Jacksonville, Florida 32223

Manhole or Catch Basin Type A & B Cone Sections Precast - Design F Manhole or Catch Basin Cover (Reducer Cone Section Precast) Design D

Oil-Water Separator Design Checklist

Appendix C Photo Plates

Crow Wing County Mound Design

Application for Site Plan Review

East Chaska Creek Restoration Project

CRAFTSMAN EXAMINATION, JUNE 2008 PLUMBING QUESTION AND ANSWER BOOKLET. Time allowed THREE hours

Zoning District: R-1, R-2, and R-4 Applicant: Exeter Rose Farm, LLC, 953 Islington Street #23D Portsmouth, NH 03801

PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT

CHECKLIST 9-O. 24. Area of project in square feet and acres? C-1 d

DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMENTS LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT (LDP) CLEARING CLEARING & GRUBBING GRADING. Date Reviewed by. Project Name

City of Regina Standard Construction Specification SECTION 2999 LISTING OF ROADWAY STANDARD DRAWINGS

INSTALLATION OF PYRAMAT FOR CHANNELS

CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION FOR PRECAST REINFORCED CONCRETE BOX CULVERTS AND BOX SEWERS

CITY OF PITTSBURG ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT CONTRACT NO A WATER TREATEMENT PLANT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PHASE 1A ADDENDUM #1 FENCE AND DITCH AUGUST

SUBJECT: Standard Plate Turf Establishment Areas (at Pipe Culvert Ends)

PART 2 PRODUCTS Equipment... 5

1 MUNICIPAL INFRASTRUCTURE

Guide to the Single Family Site Development Process

APPENDIX A-1. Site Development Application for DRT Submittal

HEXAGONAL DOUBBLE TWISTED GABION & ROCK FALL MATRESSES

August 23, Gary Savage Faith Energy, LLC. P. O. Box 894 Shreveport, LA

SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS FOR USE PROCESS III OR PROCESS IV

SECTION 9.00 AS-BUILT DRAWING REQUIREMENTS SUB-INDEX

REGISTRATION EXAMINATION, JUNE 2008 DRAINLAYING ANSWER SCHEDULE

APPLICATION FOR SITE PREPARATION PERMIT

UTILITY AND STREET CONSTRUCTION PLAN REQUIREMENTS SECTION 1

2. Remove from the Standard Plate manual: Standard Plate Index, Sheets 1-4 of 4, Numerical Index of Standard Plates (August 31, 2012)

B.2 MAJOR SUBDIVISION PRELIMINARY PLAN CHECKLIST

Slope Stabilization System

List of Figures. List of Forms

Dewatering. Deep Wells Vacuum Wellpoints Eductor Wells Artesian Conditions System Design Water Treatment.

Engineering Design Standards for Public Improvements. Developed jointly by the Cities of Ashland and Medford

3. The PAC (Permit Application Center) will notify the design professional of plan review results.

Transcription:

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION BUREAU OF WATERSHED MANAGEMENT VISUAL INSPECTION CHECKLIST FOR GENERAL NPDES PERMIT FOR STORMWATER DISCHARGES ASSOCIATED WITH CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES (PAG-02) Note: It is a condition of NPDES permits that a visual inspection is conducted by the permittee and all copermittees on a weekly basis and after every measurable rainfall event. Failure to conduct the required inspection may result in permit suspension or the imposition of civil penalties. Inspection Type (check one): Weekly Post Rain Event Date: Time: Inspector Name: 1. Approved (stamped & signed) E & S plan and PCSM plan present on site? 2. Are there activities occurring outside of the limits of disturbance shown on the plan drawings? 3. Are areas intended for PCSM BMP s protected from compaction? 4. Identify the Stage(s) of Construction (BMP) Sequence the jobsite is at? E & S BMPs identified in the Sequence up to that stage installed properly? 5. Construction Entrance(s) installed correctly at locations shown on plan drawings? a. Construction entrance(s) installed as per the plan detail(s)? b. Construction entrance(s) properly maintained? c. Public roadways kept clean of tracked mud? - 1 -

6. Off-site discharges a. Turbid water leaving site? b. Turbid water entering a surface water? c. Evidence of sediment pollution from accelerated erosion entering a surface water? d. Evidence of previous undocumented sediment pollution to a surface water? 7. Clearing & Grubbing a. Perimeter BMPs installed concurrently with clearing operations? b. Are perimeter BMPs installed prior to general site clearing and grubbing? c. Are/were stabilized crossings (as specified in the plan) used at all stream/wetland crossings? 8. Work within stream channels/wetlands being conducted as specified in the plans? a. Base flow bypassing work area as per plans? b. Disturbed areas returned to original contours and stabilized as per plan upon completion of work? 9. Water pumped from work areas treated in the manner prescribed by the plan prior to discharge to a surface water? a. Filter bags installed, used, & maintained properly? b. Vegetated filter strips functioning properly and maintained properly? c. Other devices installed, used, & maintained properly? 10. Silt fence installed where shown on plan drawings? a. Installed on existing level grade? b. Properly anchored? c. Stakes meet plan specifications? - 2 -

d. Fences properly maintained? i. Sediment removed when at ½ above-ground height of fence? ii. Undercut or overtopped fence replaced with rock filter outlet? iii. Torn or weathered fence replaced? 11. Compost socks installed where shown on plan drawings? a. Socks installed on level grade? b. Properly staked? c. Properly maintained? i. Sediment removed when ½ height of sock? ii. Undercut or overtopped socks repaired & concentrated flows directed away from sock? iii. Torn or damaged sock repaired/replaced? 12. Stabilized access provided to trap and/or basin locations as shown on plan drawings? a. Any evidence of runoff problems due to the access roads? 13. Sediment traps installed where shown on plan drawings? a. Embankment properly constructed? i. Does the embankment lack compaction? ii. Side slopes over steep? iii. Any low points? iv. Embankment vegetated or blanketed (if newly constructed)? v. Any tension cracks evident along the top? vi. Any evidence of piping (holes in embankment)? b. Barrel/Riser Spillways located where shown on plan? i. Any elevation problems (e.g. riser higher than embankment, etc.)? ii. Any perforation problems (holes located at bottom of trap, too many holes, holes larger or smaller than 1 dia.)? iii. Trash rack & antivortex device shown on plan drawings provided? iv. Riser has water-tight connection to outlet barrel? v. Any leaking problems (scouring or holes at base of riser, sound of running water with water level below lowest hole)? - 3 -

vi. vii. Any piping around outlet barrel? Spillway properly maintained? 1. Holes not plugged? 2. Damaged risers repaired/replaced? c. Embankment spillways located where shown on plan? i. Stone is the correct size per the plan? ii. Stone lower in center than at sides? iii. Layer of filter stone on inside face of spillway? iv. Filter fabric securely staked on top of filter stone up to top of sediment storage elevation? v. Spillway properly maintained? 1. Clogged spillway repaired/replaced? 2. Damaged/displaced filter cloth replaced/restaked? d. Skimmers installed as per plan details? i. Attachment to permanent riser or outlet barrel appears to be water-tight? ii. Skimmer has a stable landing place? iii. Any problems with the flexible hose? e. Outlet protection installed as shown on plan drawings? i. Stone is the correct size per the plan? ii. Discharges are safely conveyed to receiving surface water? iii. Outlet protection properly maintained? 1. Any signs of rock displacement? 2. Any sediment deposits on apron? 3. Any erosion around or below apron? f. Trap interior stabilized? g. Any evidence of slope failure inside the trap? h. Any evidence of sink holes developing inside the trap? i. Are baffles, silt curtains, forebays provided as shown on the plan drawings? j. Has suitable protection been provided at the inflows as shown on the plans? 14. Sediment Basins installed where shown on the plan drawings? a. Embankment properly constructed? i. Does the embankment lack compaction? ii. Side slopes over steep? iii. Any low points? iv. Embankment vegetated or blanketed (if newly constructed)? - 4 -

v. Any tension cracks evident along the top? vi. Any evidence of piping (holes in embankment)? b. Barrel/Riser Spillways located where shown on plan? i. Any elevation problems (e.g. riser higher than embankment, etc.)? ii. Any perforation problems (holes located at bottom of basin, too many/few holes, holes larger or smaller than 1 dia.)? iii. Trash rack & antivortex device shown on plan drawings provided? iv. Riser has water-tight connection to outlet barrel? v. Any leaking problems (scouring or holes at base of riser, sound of running water with water level below lowest hole)? vi. Any piping around outlet barrel? vii. Riser properly maintained? 1. Holes not plugged? 2. Damaged risers repaired/replaced? c. Skimmers installed as per plan details? i. Attachment to permanent riser or outlet barrel appears to be water-tight? ii. Skimmer has a stable landing place? iii. Any problems with the flexible hose? d. Emergency Spillway constructed at the location shown on the plan drawings? i. Any dimension problems (width of spillway, size of rock, depth of spillway)? ii. Was the spillway choked with rock? iii. Has an outlet channel been provided for the emergency spillway as shown on the plan drawings? e. Outlet protection installed as shown on plan drawings? i. Stone is sized properly per the plan? ii. Discharges are safely conveyed to receiving surface water? iii. Outlet protection properly maintained? 1. Any signs of rock displacement? 2. Any sediment deposits on apron? 3. Any erosion around or below apron? f. Basin interior stabilized? g. Any evidence of slope failure inside the basin? h. Any evidence of sink holes developing inside the basin? i. Are baffles, silt curtains, forebays provided as shown on the plan drawings? j. Has suitable protection been provided at the inflows as shown on the plans? 15. Are all channels constructed at the locations shown on the plan drawings? a. Any dimension or shape problems (smaller than details show, V-channel instead of trapezoid, etc.)? b. Have the protective linings been installed as specified? - 5 -

c. Are there any gradient problems (standing water, sediment deposits)? d. Are there any flow obstructions (large rocks, soil slips, straw bales, non-culverted crossings, etc.)? e. Any erosion problems? f. Any out-of-channel flow problems (erosion trails leading away downslope from the channel)? g. Any failures of the channel linings? h. Do collector channels enter basins/traps on the upslope sides? i. Any disturbed areas above diversion channels? j. Any disturbed areas below collector channels with no additional BMPs? 16. Are slope pipes installed where shown on the plans? a. Are they water-tight? b. Are they anchored? c. Has runoff been directed to the head of the pipe? d. Has outlet protection been provided per the plans? 17. Are trenching operations being conducted at the locations & in the manner shown on the plan drawings? a. Are area limitations being followed? b. Are stream crossings being conducted in the proscribed manner? i. Base flow bypassed as specified? ii. Disturbed areas within 50 of top-of-bank blanketed? c. Are trench plugs being used as specified? d. Are waterbars being installed on backfilled areas? 18. Has inlet protection been installed at the locations shown on the plans? a. Is the type of inlet protection shown in the approved plans installed? b. Was it installed according to the details? c. Does any of the inlet protection need to be cleaned or replaced? - 6 -

19. Is stabilization being kept current with final grade? a. Cut & fill slopes stabilized in regular vertical increments. b. Erosion control blanketing installed where shown on the plans & according to the plan details? c. Erosion gullies addressed & stabilized in a timely manner? d. Poorly vegetated areas reseeded? 20. Final stabilization achieved? a. Vegetated areas meet uniform 70%, perennial vegetation requirement? b. Non-vegetated areas have a stable erosion-resistant surface? 21. Pictures taken to document findings of the inspection (good and bad)? 22. Inspection report completed on site? a. All parts of the report filled out? b. Contents of the report discussed with site representative along with possible means to correct deficiencies where needed? 23. Are the measures or activities that are installed (or being installed) to address postconstruction stormwater runoff properly installed and maintained to function as designed after the site has been stabilized? Signature Title - 7 -