A GBAS Testbed to Support New Monitoring Algorithms Development for CAT III Precision Approach

Similar documents
Calculation of the received voltage due to the radiation from multiple co-frequency sources

To: Professor Avitabile Date: February 4, 2003 From: Mechanical Student Subject: Experiment #1 Numerical Methods Using Excel

NATIONAL RADIO ASTRONOMY OBSERVATORY Green Bank, West Virginia SPECTRAL PROCESSOR MEMO NO. 25. MEMORANDUM February 13, 1985

A Simple Satellite Exclusion Algorithm for Advanced RAIM

Dynamic Optimization. Assignment 1. Sasanka Nagavalli January 29, 2013 Robotics Institute Carnegie Mellon University

Research of Dispatching Method in Elevator Group Control System Based on Fuzzy Neural Network. Yufeng Dai a, Yun Du b

Techniques for Graceful Reversion from Dual to Single Frequency WAAS

antenna antenna (4.139)

MTBF PREDICTION REPORT

Uncertainty in measurements of power and energy on power networks

Walsh Function Based Synthesis Method of PWM Pattern for Full-Bridge Inverter

WAAS-Based Threat Monitoring for a Local Airport Monitor (LAM) that Supports Category I Precision Approach

Optimal Placement of PMU and RTU by Hybrid Genetic Algorithm and Simulated Annealing for Multiarea Power System State Estimation

Define Y = # of mobiles from M total mobiles that have an adequate link. Measure of average portion of mobiles allocated a link of adequate quality.

Priority based Dynamic Multiple Robot Path Planning

NOVEL ITERATIVE TECHNIQUES FOR RADAR TARGET DISCRIMINATION

Empirical Assessment and Modelling of RFI Impact on Aviation GPS/SBAS Receiver Performance

Adaptive Modulation for Multiple Antenna Channels

Test 2. ECON3161, Game Theory. Tuesday, November 6 th

Performance Analysis of Multi User MIMO System with Block-Diagonalization Precoding Scheme

Phasor Representation of Sinusoidal Signals

Point Real-Time Kinematic Positioning

Signal Deformation Monitoring for Dual- Frequency WAAS

PRACTICAL, COMPUTATION EFFICIENT HIGH-ORDER NEURAL NETWORK FOR ROTATION AND SHIFT INVARIANT PATTERN RECOGNITION. Evgeny Artyomov and Orly Yadid-Pecht

Parameter Free Iterative Decoding Metrics for Non-Coherent Orthogonal Modulation

Comparative Analysis of Reuse 1 and 3 in Cellular Network Based On SIR Distribution and Rate

1 GSW Multipath Channel Models

Digital Transmission

Development of an UWB Rescue Radar System - Detection of Survivors Using Fuzzy Reasoning -

Control Chart. Control Chart - history. Process in control. Developed in 1920 s. By Dr. Walter A. Shewhart

Discussion on How to Express a Regional GPS Solution in the ITRF

TECHNICAL NOTE TERMINATION FOR POINT- TO-POINT SYSTEMS TN TERMINATON FOR POINT-TO-POINT SYSTEMS. Zo = L C. ω - angular frequency = 2πf

MASTER TIMING AND TOF MODULE-

Chaotic Filter Bank for Computer Cryptography

Analysis of Time Delays in Synchronous and. Asynchronous Control Loops. Bj rn Wittenmark, Ben Bastian, and Johan Nilsson

Rejection of PSK Interference in DS-SS/PSK System Using Adaptive Transversal Filter with Conditional Response Recalculation

Figure.1. Basic model of an impedance source converter JCHPS Special Issue 12: August Page 13

Guidelines for CCPR and RMO Bilateral Key Comparisons CCPR Working Group on Key Comparison CCPR-G5 October 10 th, 2014

@IJMTER-2015, All rights Reserved 383

High Speed ADC Sampling Transients

A Comparison of Two Equivalent Real Formulations for Complex-Valued Linear Systems Part 2: Results

A study of turbo codes for multilevel modulations in Gaussian and mobile channels

Topology Control for C-RAN Architecture Based on Complex Network

GLONASS Double Difference Ambiguity Resolution in Real-Time

High Speed, Low Power And Area Efficient Carry-Select Adder

Algorithms and Performance of the EGNOS CPF Independent Check Set

Space Time Equalization-space time codes System Model for STCM

IEE Electronics Letters, vol 34, no 17, August 1998, pp ESTIMATING STARTING POINT OF CONDUCTION OF CMOS GATES

Review: Our Approach 2. CSC310 Information Theory

A NSGA-II algorithm to solve a bi-objective optimization of the redundancy allocation problem for series-parallel systems

RC Filters TEP Related Topics Principle Equipment

Network Reconfiguration in Distribution Systems Using a Modified TS Algorithm

A Novel Optimization of the Distance Source Routing (DSR) Protocol for the Mobile Ad Hoc Networks (MANET)

A MODIFIED DIRECTIONAL FREQUENCY REUSE PLAN BASED ON CHANNEL ALTERNATION AND ROTATION

DESIGN OF OPTIMIZED FIXED-POINT WCDMA RECEIVER

Passive Filters. References: Barbow (pp ), Hayes & Horowitz (pp 32-60), Rizzoni (Chap. 6)

Satellite Attitude Determination Using GPS Receiver Based on Wahba Cost Function

NEW ALGORITHM FOR ATTITUDE DETERMINATION USING GPS SIGNALS

Optimizing a System of Threshold-based Sensors with Application to Biosurveillance

A Fuzzy-based Routing Strategy for Multihop Cognitive Radio Networks

Sensors for Motion and Position Measurement

On Channel Estimation of OFDM-BPSK and -QPSK over Generalized Alpha-Mu Fading Distribution

DESIGN OF OPTIMIZED FIXED-POINT WCDMA RECEIVER

Time-frequency Analysis Based State Diagnosis of Transformers Windings under the Short-Circuit Shock

熊本大学学術リポジトリ. Kumamoto University Repositor

New Approach to Achieving Stand Alone GPS Attitude Determination using Dual Short Baselines for Small-Satellite

GPS Attitude Determination Reliability Performance Improvement Using Low Cost Receivers

On-the-fly GPS-based attitude determination using single- and double- differenced carrier phase measurements

Efficient Large Integers Arithmetic by Adopting Squaring and Complement Recoding Techniques

A Spreading Sequence Allocation Procedure for MC-CDMA Transmission Systems

GNSS Airborne Multipath Errors Distribution Using the High Resolution Aeronautical Channel Model and Comparison to SARPs Error Curve

Image analysis using modulated light sources Feng Xiao a*, Jeffrey M. DiCarlo b, Peter B. Catrysse b, Brian A. Wandell a

A Novel GNSS Weak Signal Acquisition Using Wavelet Denoising Method

Prevention of Sequential Message Loss in CAN Systems

Webinar Series TMIP VISION

Monitoring large-scale power distribution grids

Graph Method for Solving Switched Capacitors Circuits

Air Exchange and Ventilation in an Underground Train Station

Application of Intelligent Voltage Control System to Korean Power Systems

POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY Electrical Engineering Department. EE SOPHOMORE LABORATORY Experiment 1 Laboratory Energy Sources

Resource Allocation Optimization for Device-to- Device Communication Underlaying Cellular Networks

Distributed Fault Detection of Wireless Sensor Networks

Intelligent pipeline control - a simulation study in the automotive sector

Low-Cost Attitude Determination Using GPS Signals for the University Microsatellite PalaMede

Weighted Penalty Model for Content Balancing in CATS

Comparison of Two Measurement Devices I. Fundamental Ideas.

Robust TDOA Passive Location Using Interval Analysis and Contractor Programming

Detection and Mitigation of GPS Spoofing Based on Antenna Array Processing

DETERMINATION OF WIND SPEED PROFILE PARAMETERS IN THE SURFACE LAYER USING A MINI-SODAR

Adaptive System Control with PID Neural Networks

A New Type of Weighted DV-Hop Algorithm Based on Correction Factor in WSNs

Improved corner neutron flux calculation for Start-up Range Neutron Monitor

Understanding the Spike Algorithm

Ergodic Capacity of Block-Fading Gaussian Broadcast and Multi-access Channels for Single-User-Selection and Constant-Power

Learning Ensembles of Convolutional Neural Networks

Latency Insertion Method (LIM) for IR Drop Analysis in Power Grid

On the Feasibility of Receive Collaboration in Wireless Sensor Networks

A New Ranging Method for OFDMA Systems

Novel Sampling Clock Offset Estimation for DVB-T OFDM

An Adaptive Over-current Protection Scheme for MV Distribution Networks Including DG

Transcription:

A GBAS Testbed to Support New Montorng Algorthms Development for CAT III Precson Approach B. Belabbas, T. Dautermann, M. Felux, M. Rppl, S. Schlüter, V. Wlken, A. Hornbostel, M. Meurer German Aerospace Center (DLR. e.v.) Insttute of Communcatons and Navgaton Abstract The development of new montorng algorthms needs to have access to a platform that offers flexblty, operatonal evaluaton facltes, test and valdaton capactes. DLR s GBAS test bed offers all these features wth addtonal smulaton capablty. Ths paper llustrates these propertes by showng an applcaton of the recently developed absolute onosphere gradent montor by takng advantage of a network of three reference recevers located n the DLR s research arport at Braunschweg. Ths paper presents a frst draft of an absolute onosphere gradent montor capable of detectng gradents from 300 mm/km to 000 mm/km n order to fulfll the GAST-D requrements n terms of onospherc gradent montorng for the ground subsystem. The three recevers gve the possblty to buld two ndependent Absolute Slant Ionosphere Gradent Montors (ASIGM). The performances acheved depend on the performances of the recevers, ther relatve locaton and the orentaton of ther baselnes wth respect to the runway drecton. ASIGM wth baselne n the drecton of the runway provde the best observablty of an onsphere gradent that a GBAS user can experence durng the approach phase (for straght-n approaches). The smaller the angle between the runway and the consdered montor baselne s, the lower the uncertanty of the gradent n the drecton of the runway. Dstrbuton of recevers parallel to the runway provdes the best observablty condtons. Ths paper gves the optmal relatve locaton of recevers n order to acheve 00% detectablty n the 300 to 000 mm/km range of the absolute slant onosphere gradent. Two confguratons were nvestgated: one wth 3 and another one wth 4 recevers lnearly dstrbuted. The results obtaned are extremely promsng for the GAST-D requrements fulfllment and the correspondng archtectures can easly be mplemented. Introducton The Ground Based Augmentaton System Testbed developed by DLR uses three recevers wth separatons of 740, 760 and 770 m from each other (see Fgure 3). In ths paper we explore the capabltes of the absolute onosphere gradent montor as proposed n [] and adapt t for the mult recever (>) case. Intally, we present the dual baselne onosphere gradent montor and we defne the varables and parameters of the problem. Then we nvestgate the performance acheved wth the exstng archtecture of 3 recevers. Thrd, we adapt the montor for the exstng confguraton of the GBAS test bed and analyze the smulaton results of ths confguraton. Fnally, n the last part of ths manuscrpt, we nvestgate the specal case of co-lnearly dstrbuted recevers and propose optmal separaton strateges when usng 3 or 4 algned recevers. A concluson summarzes the results obtaned and gves drectons of future work.

Dual baselne absolute slant onosphere gradent montor The absolute slant onosphere gradent montor proposed n [] s based on sngle frequency double dfference carrer phase observatons. Assumng a precse knowledge of the recevers postons (and thus ther baselne separaton vector), t s possble to determne double dfference resdual bases lke the onospherc decorrelaton between recevers. These bases can be estmated as long as they are not wthn the measurement uncertanty to an nteger multple of a wavelength. In the followng, we keep the same notatons as n [] and descrbe the dual baselne absolute slant onosphere gradent montor. Fgure : Confguraton scheme and notatons. b j s the baselne vector defned by the reference recever RR and RR j. s the angle between b and the runway drecton, s the angle between the two baselnes Let s denote as the standard devaton of the overbound carrer phase resdual error (nose and multpath) of recever. In order to study the senstvty of the montor performances to recever carrer phase error, we keep the standard devaton of each recever ndependent and we defne rj j / the standard devaton rato between recever j and recever. Let s call j the standard devaton of the double dfference phase error when consderng recever j and recever as reference. Then j j r () Furthermore, we assume that the phase resdual errors are ndependent from satellte to satellte wth respect to one recever and ndependent from recever to recever wth respect to one satellte. We also assume that the errors or, more precsely, the error overbounds are Gaussan dstrbuted. Snce our nterest s to montor the onosphere gradent component n the drecton of the runway, t s necessary to adapt the ndvdual test statstcs by projectng the baselnes. The double dfference carrer phase observaton equaton can be wrtten as follow (see []): e b n b () T j j j j j j The left hand sde can be measured at each epoch and s composed of j the double dfference carrer phase measurement between recever and recever j, the dfferental recever T to satellte unt vector e (whch can be determned usng the navgaton message of the consdered satelltes) and the baselne vector between the recevers b j. The rght hand sde of the equaton s unknown and correspond to the sum of double dfference carrer phase cycle ambguty nj, the onosphere gradent j between recever and j tmes baselne b j, and the double dfference carrer phase resdual error j whose dstrbuton s overbounded by the Gaussan dstrbuton wth standard devaton j mentoned prevously. The ASIGMs measure the gradent n the baselne drectons whch are not necessarly algned wth the runway. Fgure descrbes ths schematcally: Fgure : Ionosphere gradent projectons from both montors. j s the gradent estmated usng RR and RR j and s the projecton of j n the o j drecton of the runway. and are the same angles as n Fgure.

From Fgure, we can see that o o 3, 3. (3) cos cos For each baselne, an absolute onosphere gradent montor usng the test statstc as defned n [] can be mplemented. We assume that these montors are ndependent and that each onosphere gradent detected by one of them s projected nto the runway drecton. One needs to be careful wth the fact that the montor can t observe drectly the gradent n the runway drecton but only the component n the drecton of the baselne. An extreme case s a baselne perpendcular to the runway. Ths would drve to an nfnte gradent when projected n the drecton of the runway. Therefore the angles and should be kept as close as possble to zero. The detectable onosphere gradents are those fulfllng the followng nequaltes: ffd md ( ) ffd md n k k n k k o (3) b cos b cos n' kffd kmd 3 ( n' ) o kffd kmd 3 3 (4) b cos b cos 3 3 wth n and n beng ndependent ntegers, s the wavelength of the consdered sgnal, k ffd s the nflaton factor for fulfllng the requred probablty of false alarm and k md s the nflaton factor for fulfllng the requred probablty of mssed detecton. Detals can be found n [].These expressons are symmetrc wth respect to n and n respectvely. Applcaton to DLR s GBAS Testbed For our smulatons, we used the actual recever locatons of the DLR s GBAS Testbed as shown n Fgure 3. Ths GBAS Test bed s composed of 3 recevers wth a plan to nstall a 4 th one. Fgure 3: GBAS reference recever locaton at Braunschweg arport The locatons of the recevers n ECEF coordnate system are gven n Table : Rx X n m Y n m Z n m RR 384069.039 75604.8 504909.863 RR 3840835.3 7486.969 504848.587 RR3 3840.939 7549.959 504488.675 Table : Recevers locatons n ECEF coordnates From these locatons we can determne the lengths of the baselnes as well as the angles between baselnes and runway drecton. We consder as a varable and for each value of the scalng factors r and r 3 are varyng from 0. to 0 (carrer phase nose of RR or RR 3 ranges from 0 tmes better to 0 tmes worse than carrer phase nose of RR ). There are dfferent approaches for takng beneft of both montors: BR 34 760m BR 50 770m 740m BR 98 A slant onosphere gradent s consdered detected f at least one montor can detect t (mnmze the mssed detecton probablty) A slant onosphere gradent s consdered detected only f both montors smultaneously detect t (mnmze the false alarm probablty) These two dfferent approaches represent exptreme cases for a commbned dual baselne montor.e ther applcaton gves upper and lower performance bounds. Smulaton and Analyss of Results The senstvty of the montor performance wth respect to the recever accuracy s plotted n Fgure 4a:

both montors can detect (represented by ) and Fgure 4d demonstrates the detectablty when at least one montor can detect (represented by ) Fgure 4a: Absolute slant ono gradent montor avalablty functon of standard devaton of phase error for baselne b. Red marks areas of slant gradent that the montor cannot detect for a gved The largest baselne b provdes the largest avalablty at the GBAS testbed. As only the regon 300-000 mm/km s relevant for GAST-D [], we decded to show only ths area n all our results. As geometry screenng [3] and [4] would nduce an unacceptable level of unavalablty of the system, the extreme onosphere gradents must be montored n an effcent way. Studes have been conducted to analyse the mpact of an onosphere montor n GBAS applcatons [5] and drve to the fact that n certan crcumstances an absolute onosphere gradent s necessary. Fgure 4c: ASIGM ASIGM3 detecton functonalty dependent on slant gradent and the level of double dfference carrer phase resdual error. Whte areas are detectable gradents. Mnmum Fgure 4d: ASIGM ASIGM3 detecton functonalty dependent on slant gradent and the level of double dfference carrer phase resdual error. Whte areas are detectable gradents. Fgure 4b: Absolute slant ono gradent montor avalablty functon of standard devaton of phase error for baselne b 3. Both Fgure 4c and 4d show a loss of perodcty at least for the range of nterest. The avalablty area s better n Fgure 4d than n Fgure 4c, as expected. The mpact of an addtonal montor wth a dfferent baselne reduces the area of undetectablty. An mportant aspect s the Fgures 4c and 4d show the montor results wth the logc as defned n the prevous paragraph. Fgure 4c shows results of detectablty when

Fgure 5: Percentage of detectablty area (color scale from 0 to 00%) functon of / (x axs) and 3/ (y axs) for ASIGM ASIGM3 combnaton ( st raw) and for ASIGM ASIGM3 combnaton ( nd raw) and for =0.5,, and 3 mm ( st, nd, 3 rd and 4 th column) mnmum for whch 00% of the gradents n the range 300-000 mm/km are detectable. Ths mnmum ~ mm s shown n Fgure 4d for the DLR GBAS Testbed. Ths s an mportant parameter as ths wll provde requrements for the antennas, recevers and level of multpath n the neghborhood of the antennas. The baselne for the addtonal antenna should be chosen n a way that the mnmum that provdes 00% detectablty s as large as possble. From Fgure 4d, an addtonal montor wth a maxmum detectablty around 500 mm/km wll mprove sgnfcantly the mnmum allowed carrer phase double dfference resdual error to acheve 00% detectablty. Fgure 5 shows the mpact of the level of the double dfference carrer phase error n the performance of a dual baselne montor. We have on x axs the carrer phase error standard devaton rato varaton / and on the y axs 3/. The colorbar represents the percentage of detectablty area covered by the gven confguraton. As expected the senstvty to the reference recever carrer phase error s very hgh (colomn to 4) for both confguratons. We used the same axs for all plots. We can see that the curves are symmetrc wth respect to the lne. 3 Optmal lnear dstrbuton of montors We consder n ths chapter that the recevers are all algned and parallel to the runway (co-lnear). Let m be the total number of recevers wth m. Let s fx the largest baselne b m B and consder one of the recevers at the edge to be the reference recever. Fgure 7 shows a schematc descrpton of ths confguraton. Fgure 6: Schematc descrpton of the lnear dstrbuton of recevers and notatons Suppose that the recevers have all the same performances: j {, j},,..., m where we have nserted the factor ½ for easer algebrac manpulaton. We defne b to be the baselne from recever to recever. Let s defne the baselne rato b / b m. There are m- ratos to be consdered wth 0 m.

We would lke to fnd the optmal that allows 00% detectablty n the range 300-000 mm/km usng the recevers wth the hghest values. The avalablty areas of the montor ASIGM (Absolute Slant Ionospherc Gradent Montor between recever RR and recever RR ) are defned usng the followng nequalty: ffd md ffd md n k k n k k (5) B B s the slant onosphere gradent detectable by the montor. Ths nequalty defnes the area where s detectable. It s defned for all ntegers n. We can observe that f 0, for any there exst an nteger n for whch n n and such an deal B B montor wth no carrer phase error would have 00% detectablty. The mnmum of for whch we have 00% of detectablty s obtaned n for n. The mnmum of for B whch we have 0% detectablty s obtaned for. It s nterestng to notce kffd kmd that ths s a constant. Ths s obtaned for n / n. The functon B g delmtng the area of avalablty of the montor ASIGM s a perodcally pecewse lnear functon that can be wrtten n the followng form: n f n (6) n n n n f n n (7) n n For m=3, we keep B and as varable. We search the optmal B of B and of that maxmze the level of double dfference carrer phase error and mantanng a 00% detectablty of an absolute slant onosphere gradent n the range 300-000 mm/km. A gradent must be at least detected by one montor to be consdered wthn the detecton range by the whole system. The second possble combnaton (detectablty when all montors detect) s not consdered n ths chapter. The optmal problem, defned through the objectve functon that we want to maxmze s taken as the carrer phase error that provdes 00 % of detectablty n the range 300-000 mm/km. The am s to fnd the baselnes that drve to ths maxmum and the value of the objectve funcon at ths optmum. The determnaton of ths optmum s done numercally by consderng dscrete values for each baselne. The functons defned by equatons 6 and 7 are calculated for each dscretzed baselne and for each nteger values correspondng to the 300-000 mm/km range. The monotors are then fused by takng the maxmum values of the functons correspondng to each montor for each slant onosphere gradent. For each dscrete value of the baselnes we fnd the mnmum of for whch 00% of detectablty s guaranted. The results are plotted n Fgure 7. Fgure 7: Maxmum standard devaton carrer phase error (color scale from 0 to 7 mm) that provdes 00 % detectablty n the range 300-000 mm/km functon of the largest baselne n meter n the x axs and b /B n the y axs We can notce n Fgure 7 a superposton of symmetrc trend wth respect to b /B and a dssymmetrc trend probably due to the dssymmetry of the range of slant onopshere gradents. For B below 8 meter, there s an ndependancy wth respect to. For B 90 m and 0.5 (recever n the mddle of the nterval), takes very low values and ths

archtecture although symmetrcal should be avoded. The values fund for the optmum are: 6.97 mm, B 77 m, 0.387. Ths confguraton provdes the followng detectablty area: Fgure 0a: Mnmum carrer phase error for 00% B, gradent detecton 3 Fgure 9: Slant onosphere gradent detecton area for m=3 recevers optmally lnearly dstrbuted. The hgh level of double dfference carrer phase nose allowed ( ) can be acheved wth a well calbrated antenna. The stng crtera should take nto consderaton the multpath envronment as usual. Attenton should be pad to the possble multpath correlaton between RR and RR due to the shorter baselne. If we apply these results to propose a possble locaton of a 4 th recever at Braunschweg research arport to acheve GAST-D requrements and consder the recevers RR and RR for the largest baselne ( B 770 m ), the optmal locaton for RR4 would be 77 m from RR and the maxmum allowed double dfference carrer phase error standard devaton would be 4.5 mm to acheve 00% of onosphere gradent detectablty. Fgure 0a: Mnmum carrer phase error for 00% B, gradent detecton 3 For m=4 and supposng all 4 recevers are algned. We fnd the followng optmal surfaces: Fgure 0c: Mnmum carrer phase error for 00%, gradent detecton B 3

The optmum s obtaned for 0.8, 3 0.53 m B, The result s a maxmum tolerable carrer phase error of 8.65 mm and t provdes the followng detectablty area: range as baselnes are necessary to estmate the front tself. A lnear dstrbuton of recevers n the drecton of the runway shows very promsng results. The optmal dstrbuton can be mplemented n a majorty of arports. Future work conssts of defnng an optmal combnaton of ndvdual montors to meet overall CAT III ntegrty and contnuty requrements valdated through measurements and hardware smulatons. Dependng on the combnaton strategy, ntegrty and contnuty allocatons can be derved at each recever level and therefore by balancng the weghtng decson, t wll be possble to exactly ft the overall performance requrements of the combned montor. Fgure : Slant onosphere gradent detecton area for m=4 recevers optmally dstrbuted As expected the addton of one recever provdes hgher maxmum allowable double dfference carrer phase error and the maxmum baselne remans acceptable for a majorty of arports. Concluson and future work A frst analyss gves us an estmate for the maxmum level of allowable carrer phase error at each recever and an onosphere based stng crtera for the fourth recever n Braunschweg. The thrd recever defnes a baselne that s not n the drecton of the runway. Therefore ts test statstc can t be drectly lnked to a gradent that could be experenced by a ground system or an Arcraft durng a CAT III precson approach. It s n that case necessary to adopt a conservatve approach consderng the gradent observed as the projecton of a gradent n the drecton of the runway. Ths would drve to a large number of false alarms and therefore can t fulfl the contnuty requrements. A possblty to use the non co lnearty of the baselnes could be n a complementary way for detectng addtonal characterstcs of the onosphere front lke ts drecton. In that case addtonal baselnes are necessary to ensure the 00% of detectablty n the 300-000 mm/km References [] S. Khanafseh and F. Yang and B. Pervan, Carrer Phase Ionosphere Gradent Ground Montor for GBAS wth Expermental Valdaton, ION GNSS 00, September 00 [] Internatonal Standards and Recommended Practces Aeronautcal Telecommuncatons Annex 0, Chapter 3, Appendx B + Attachment D. [3] Jyun Lee and Mng Luo and Sam Pullen and Young Shn Park and Per Enge and Mats Brenner, Poston-Doman Geometry Screenng to Maxmze LAAS Avalablty n the Presence of Ionosphere Anomales, ION GNSS, 006 [4] M. Harrs and T. Murphy, Geometry Screenng for GBAS to Meet CAT III Integrty and Contnuty Requrements, ION NTM, January 007 [5] M. Harrs and T. Murphy, Puttng the Standardzed GBAS Ionospherc Anomaly Montors to the Test, n Proceedngs of the ION GNSS 009, Savannah, GA, Sep 009.