Neural Coding of Multiple Stimulus Features in Auditory Cortex

Similar documents
Magnetoencephalography and Auditory Neural Representations

Modulation Encoding in Auditory Cortex. Jonathan Z. Simon University of Maryland

Concurrent Encoding of Frequency and Amplitude Modulation in Human Auditory Cortex: Encoding Transition

Concurrent Encoding of Frequency and Amplitude Modulation in Human Auditory Cortex: MEG Evidence

Spectro-Temporal Methods in Primary Auditory Cortex David Klein Didier Depireux Jonathan Simon Shihab Shamma

Physiological evidence for auditory modulation filterbanks: Cortical responses to concurrent modulations

Beyond Blind Averaging Analyzing Event-Related Brain Dynamics

Pressure vs. decibel modulation in spectrotemporal representations: How nonlinear are auditory cortical stimuli?

ABSTRACT. Tracking Sound Dynamics in Human Auditory Cortex: New macroscopic perspectives from MEG. Huan Luo, PhD, 2007

Introduction to Computational Neuroscience

Neuronal correlates of pitch in the Inferior Colliculus

Spectro-Temporal Processing of Dynamic Broadband Sounds In Auditory Cortex

PSYC696B: Analyzing Neural Time-series Data

Wide band pneumatic sound system for MEG

Neural Processing of Amplitude-Modulated Sounds: Joris, Schreiner and Rees, Physiol. Rev. 2004

Ripples in the Anterior Auditory Field and Inferior Colliculus of the Ferret

Detecting spread spectrum pseudo random noise tags in EEG/MEG using a structure-based decomposition

40 Hz Event Related Auditory Potential

EEG frequency tagging to study active and passive rhythmic movements

Parallel De-Noising of Biological Signals Emily Sosin. May 19, 2008

Brain Computer Interfaces for Full Body Movement and Embodiment. Intelligent Robotics Seminar Kai Brusch

EE4512 Analog and Digital Communications Chapter 6. Chapter 6 Analog Modulation and Demodulation

19 th INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON ACOUSTICS MADRID, 2-7 SEPTEMBER 2007 AUDITORY EVOKED MAGNETIC FIELDS AND LOUDNESS IN RELATION TO BANDPASS NOISES

Complex Sounds. Reading: Yost Ch. 4

HBM2006: MEG/EEG Brain mapping course MEG/EEG instrumentation and experiment design. Florence, June 11, 2006

I R UNDERGRADUATE REPORT. Stereausis: A Binaural Processing Model. by Samuel Jiawei Ng Advisor: P.S. Krishnaprasad UG

TNS Journal Club: Efficient coding of natural sounds, Lewicki, Nature Neurosceince, 2002

Machine recognition of speech trained on data from New Jersey Labs

Amplitude Modulation, II

A template-free approach for determining the latency of single events of auditory evoked M100

Large-scale cortical correlation structure of spontaneous oscillatory activity

from signals to sources asa-lab turnkey solution for ERP research

BCI for Comparing Eyes Activities Measured from Temporal and Occipital Lobes

Microelectronic sensors for impedance measurements and analysis

19 th INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON ACOUSTICS MADRID, 2-7 SEPTEMBER 2007

AM Limitations. Amplitude Modulation II. DSB-SC Modulation. AM Modifications

KYMATA DATASET 3.01: README

780. Biomedical signal identification and analysis

Amplitude Modulation II

Spectral and temporal processing in the human auditory system

Encoding of Naturalistic Stimuli by Local Field Potential Spectra in Networks of Excitatory and Inhibitory Neurons

SIMULATING RESTING CORTICAL BACKGROUND ACTIVITY WITH FILTERED NOISE. Journal of Integrative Neuroscience 7(3):

Phase and Feedback in the Nonlinear Brain. Malcolm Slaney (IBM and Stanford) Hiroko Shiraiwa-Terasawa (Stanford) Regaip Sen (Stanford)

Interference in stimuli employed to assess masking by substitution. Bernt Christian Skottun. Ullevaalsalleen 4C Oslo. Norway

The elicitation of audiovisual steady-state responses: multisensory signal congruity and phase effects

PERCEIVING MOTION CHAPTER 8

Optical Illusions and Human Visual System: Can we reveal more? Imaging Science Innovative Student Micro-Grant Proposal 2011

A Novel EEG Feature Extraction Method Using Hjorth Parameter

IEEE 802.3aq Task Force Dynamic Channel Model Ad Hoc Task 2 - Time variation & modal noise 10/13/2004 con-call

B.Tech II Year II Semester (R13) Supplementary Examinations May/June 2017 ANALOG COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS (Electronics and Communication Engineering)

Temporal Recalibration: Asynchronous audiovisual speech exposure extends the temporal window of multisensory integration

A Cross-Platform Smartphone Brain Scanner

Chapter 7 Multiple Division Techniques for Traffic Channels

Exploiting envelope fluctuations to achieve robust extraction and intelligent integration of binaural cues

Non Invasive Brain Computer Interface for Movement Control

CMPT 468: Frequency Modulation (FM) Synthesis

Master Thesis Proposal: Chess Brain-Computer Interface Design and Optimization for Low-Bandwidth and Errors

2014 M.S. Cohen all rights reserved

Brain Computer Interfaces Lecture 2: Current State of the Art in BCIs

Introduction to Amplitude Modulation

Brain and Art. Guiomar Niso. December 15, Guiomar Niso C3GI 2017

Motor Imagery based Brain Computer Interface (BCI) using Artificial Neural Network Classifiers

(Time )Frequency Analysis of EEG Waveforms

FREQUENCY TAGGING OF ELECTROCUTANEOUS STIMULI FOR OBSERVATION OF CORTICAL NOCICEPTIVE PROCESSING

Perception of pitch. Importance of pitch: 2. mother hemp horse. scold. Definitions. Why is pitch important? AUDL4007: 11 Feb A. Faulkner.

Chapter 8: Perceiving Motion

AUDL GS08/GAV1 Auditory Perception. Envelope and temporal fine structure (TFS)

Perception of pitch. Definitions. Why is pitch important? BSc Audiology/MSc SHS Psychoacoustics wk 5: 12 Feb A. Faulkner.

The psychoacoustics of reverberation

Micro-state analysis of EEG

Using PCA to Remove Biological Noise from MEG Data. Magnetoencephalography (MEG) is a promising new technique for observing

Psycho-acoustics (Sound characteristics, Masking, and Loudness)

Physics of RFID. Pawel Waszczur McMaster RFID Applications Lab McMaster University

Determination of human EEG alpha entrainment ERD/ERS using the continuous complex wavelet transform

Denoising based on time-shift PCA

COMMUNICATIONS BIOPHYSICS

Perception of pitch. Definitions. Why is pitch important? BSc Audiology/MSc SHS Psychoacoustics wk 4: 7 Feb A. Faulkner.

Week 1: EEG Signal Processing Basics

CN510: Principles and Methods of Cognitive and Neural Modeling. Neural Oscillations. Lecture 24

Pitch estimation using spiking neurons

Communications IB Paper 6 Handout 2: Analogue Modulation

Modulation is the process of impressing a low-frequency information signal (baseband signal) onto a higher frequency carrier signal

Principles of Communications ECS 332

SQUID - Superconducting QUantum Interference Device. Introduction History Operation Applications


Development of a Time-Restricted Region-Suppressed ER-SAM Beamformer and its Application to an Auditory Evoked Field Study

Temporal resolution AUDL Domain of temporal resolution. Fine structure and envelope. Modulating a sinusoid. Fine structure and envelope

Psych 333, Winter 2008, Instructor Boynton, Exam 1

BRAIN COMPUTER INTERFACES FOR MEDICAL APPLICATIONS

EE 791 EEG-5 Measures of EEG Dynamic Properties

Characterization of Auditory Evoked Potentials From Transient Binaural beats Generated by Frequency Modulating Sound Stimuli

Predicting discrimination of formant frequencies in vowels with a computational model of the auditory midbrain

Lauri Parkkonen. Jyväskylä Summer School 2013

6.551j/HST.714j Acoustics of Speech and Hearing: Exam 2

AUDL 4007 Auditory Perception. Week 1. The cochlea & auditory nerve: Obligatory stages of auditory processing

Surround suppression effect in human early visual cortex contributes to illusory contour processing: MEG evidence.

University of West Bohemia in Pilsen Department of Computer Science and Engineering Univerzitní Pilsen Czech Republic

Linear Frequency Modulation (FM) Chirp Signal. Chirp Signal cont. CMPT 468: Lecture 7 Frequency Modulation (FM) Synthesis

Outline. Communications Engineering 1

Transcription:

Neural Coding of Multiple Stimulus Features in Auditory Cortex Jonathan Z. Simon Neuroscience and Cognitive Sciences Biology / Electrical & Computer Engineering University of Maryland, College Park

Computational Sensorimotor Systems Laboratory Students Juanjuan Xiang Maria Chait Nayef Ahmar Minsuk Park Victor Grau-Serrat Faculty David Poeppel Shihab Shamma Cindy Moss Huan Luo Ling Ma Claudia Bonin Murat Aytekin Raul Esteban Alain de Cheveigné Catherine Carr Postdocs Yadong Wang Mounya Elhilali Lab Staff Jeff Walker Ray Shantanu Supported by NIH (NIDCD/NIBIB/NIA) 1R03DC004382, 1R01EB004750, 1R01AG027573, 1R01DC007657, 1F31NS055589 Luo, H., Y. Wang, D. Poeppel & J. Z. Simon (2006), J. Neurophysiology

Outline Magnetoencephalography (MEG) as a tool of Non-Invasive Auditory Physiology MEG in the Frequency Domain Neural Encoding of Modulations

Magnetoencephalography (MEG) Non-invasive, Passive, Silent Neural Recordings Simultaneous Whole-Head Recording (~200 sensors) Sensitivity high: ~100 ft (10 13 Tesla) low: ~10 4 ~10 6 neurons Temporal Resolution: ~1 ms Spatial Resolution coarse: ~1 cm ambiguous

Functional Imaging Hemodynamic techniques Non-invasive recording from human brain (Functional brain imaging) Electromagnetic techniques Functional magnetic resonance imaging fmri Positron emission tomography PET Electroencephalography EEG Magnetoencephalography MEG Excellent spatial resolution ( ~ 1-2 mm) Poor temporal resolution ( ~ 1 s) PET, EEG require across-subject averaging fmri and MEG can capture effects in single subjects Poor spatial resolution ( ~ 1 cm) Excellent temporal resolution ( ~ 1 ms)

Primary Neural Current Photo by Fritz Goro

MEG Measures Neural Currents SQUID Gradiometer Sink Source Magnetic Dipolar Field (Projection) Direct electrophysiological measurement not hemodynamic real-time No unique solution for distributed source

MEG Response Flattened Isofield Contour Map Sink Source t = 98 ms 40 ft/step Instantaneous Magnetic Field

MEG Response 3-D Isofield Contour Map Chait, Poeppel and Simon, Cerebral Cortex 2006

MEG Response Spatial Map of Time Series 500 (ft) 500 (ms)

MEG Response Butterfly Plot 400 t = 98 ms 200 0-200 -400-100 0 100 200 300 400 Time (ms)

Time Course of MEG Responses Evoked Responses MEG Events Time-Locked to Stimulus Event Pure Tone Broadband Noise

Spatial Auditory MEG Responses Auditory Responses Robust Strongly Lateralized M50 Change Onset SSR ICA

MEG as Auditory Physiology Tool Advantages of humans over animals Subjects can be rented (by the hour) Subjects can be trained in minutes Better grasp of subjects perceptual space (?) Access to Speech & Language processing (?) Advantage of Whole Head Recording Disadvantage of Neural Source Localization Coarseness/Ambiguity in Source Location Blindness to Many Kinds of Coding Neutral Aspects Neural Source is Dendritic Current (not Spikes) Humans not typical mammals (?) New Technique/Immature Analysis Tools

Outline Magnetoencephalography (MEG) as a tool of Non-Invasive Auditory Physiology MEG in the Frequency Domain Neural Encoding of Modulations

An Alternative to Time: Frequency Use Stimuli localized in Frequency rather than time Examine Response at Same Frequency Steady State Response (SSR) Frequency Response/Transfer Function

Frequency Response 32 Hz Modulation 400 Hz tone carrier 100 trials @ 1 s (concatenated) Single MEG Channel Precise Phase-Locking: 0.01 Hz Little trial-to-trial jitter Amplitude + Phase...

Whole Head Steady State Response 32 Hz

Complex Magnetic Field

V = V + j V Re Im V(θ) = V cos(θ) + V sin(θ) Re Im V Re V Max θ Max 90 90 V Im V Min Intensity: V Max Phase: θ Max Sharpness: η = V Min /V Max Simon and Wang, J. Neurosci. Methods 2005

Outline Magnetoencephalography (MEG) as a tool of Non-Invasive Auditory Physiology MEG in the Frequency Domain Neural Encoding of Modulations

Modulation Encoding Simple Modulations Simple Cortical Encoding Simple Amplitude Modulation coding often used for slower modulations Rate coding (invisible to MEG) often used for faster modulations Applies to general modulations: AM, FM, other Simple Amplitude Modulation coding is easily detectable in Fourier/Spectral domain (SSR) = Spectral Peak at Modulation Frequency Coding for multiple modulations of different kinds?

Sample Dual Modulation Stimuli f FM = 3.1 Hz f AM = 37 Hz f FM = 8 Hz f AM = 37 Hz 2 1 0 0.5 1.0 1.5 0.5 1.0 1.5 time (s) time (s)

SSR Carrier Dependence SSR Amplitude SSR Phase Ross et al. (2000) SSR Phase Follows Carrier Phase Modulation Encoding Patel & Balaban (2004) 0.08 Hz

Neural Modulation Models Stimulus Carrier Frequency (FM) Stimulus Envelope Amplitude (AM) Amplitude Modulation (AM) Coding Neural Modulation Coding Phase Modulation (PM) coding time Neural Averaged Response Lower Sideband SSR Frequency Upper Sideband Neural Response Spectrum c.f. Patel & Balaban (2004) α AM = 0 or 2π α = (ϕ upper ϕ SSR ) (ϕ SSR ϕ lower ) Neural Response Phase Encoding Parameter α PM = π

Spectral Sideband Responses 37 Hz 37.3 Hz upper sidebands 37.5 Hz 37.8 Hz 0.3 Hz 0.5 Hz 0.8 Hz 36 38 40 42 44 36 38 40 42 44 36 38 40 42 44 Frequency (Hz) Frequency (Hz) Frequency (Hz) 37 Hz 38.0 Hz 38.7 Hz 1.0 Hz 39.1 Hz 1.7 Hz 2.1 Hz 36 38 40 42 44 36 38 40 42 44 36 38 40 42 44 Frequency (Hz) Frequency (Hz) Frequency (Hz) 40.0 Hz 42.0 Hz 45.0 Hz 3.0 Hz 5.0 Hz 8.0 Hz 37 Hz 36 38 40 42 44 36 38 40 42 44 36 38 40 42 44 Frequency (Hz) Frequency (Hz) Frequency (Hz)

Sideband Responses Normalized Upper Sideband Responses Chance Response Level Only Upper Sideband contributes Lower Sideband Responses Chance Response Level f FM (Hz) Modulation Encoding, with coding transition at f FM ~ 5 Hz

Modulation Encoding Type 2π π 0 f FM (Hz) Phase Modulation Encoding below f FM ~ 5 Hz

Neural Population Model S( t) = ( 1 + mcos( 2 f t + )) cos(2 f t + cos( 2 f t )) 8 + GWN

Model Results Experimental Results Model Results θ θ 2π π adj Upperdiff adj Lowerdiff 2π π adj Upperdiff adj Lowerdiff θ 2 π π θ 2π 2π 2 π 0 0.4 0.8 0 0.4 0.8 α π π π 1 2 π AI 0 π -1 0.3 0.5 0.8 1.0 1.7 2.1 3.1 5.1 8.0 10.3 15.1 Stimulus condition f (Hz) AM Modulation index m AM modulation index m S(t)= (1 + mcos(2π f t +θ)) cos(2π f t + π FM AM 8 cos(2π f FM t )) + GWN Amplitude Modulation AM in quadrature with PM Why? Phase Modulation

Summary Combined AM/FM modulations are encoded in Auditory Cortex Phase Modulation seen at lowest FM rates Modulation Encoding changes at higher rates Single Sideband Modulation unexpected Speculate: Single Modulation Encoding type? Or: Two populations of AM and PM encoding neurons whose phase happens to cancel in lower sideband? Magnetoencephalography (MEG) Directly generated by neural currents Excellent time/frequency resolution Spatial Localizability an open question

Thank You