Similar documents
Fourth Annual Multi-Stakeholder Forum on Science, Technology and Innovation for the Sustainable Development Goals

The work under the Environment under Review subprogramme focuses on strengthening the interface between science, policy and governance by bridging

Committee on Development and Intellectual Property (CDIP)

II. The mandates, activities and outputs of the Technology Executive Committee

Expert Group Meeting on Exponential Technological Change, Automation, and Their Policy Implications for Sustainable Development

I. Introduction. Cover note. A. Mandate. B. Scope of the note. Technology Executive Committee. Fifteenth meeting. Bonn, Germany, September 2017

Chapter 6. Conclusion 95 CHAPTER CONCLUSION

Annotated Chapter Outline

Second Annual Forum on Science, Technology and Innovation for the Sustainable Development Goals

The Space Millennium: Vienna Declaration on Space and Human Development *

Inter and Transdisciplinarity in Social Sciences. Approaches and lessons learned

Committee on Development and Intellectual Property (CDIP)

Systems Approaches to Health and Wellbeing in the Changing Urban Environment

Sustainable Development Goals and Science: An Opportunity

UN GA TECHNOLOGY DIALOGUES, APRIL JUNE

Perspectives of Scientists on technology and the SDGs 61 scientists 3 tasks 20 countries 45 disciplines. 97 scientists 58 briefs

Rolling workplan of the Technology Executive Committee for

European Commission. 6 th Framework Programme Anticipating scientific and technological needs NEST. New and Emerging Science and Technology

Science for Sustainable Development. Policy Brief by the Scientific Advisory Board of the UN Secretary-General

The UNISDR Global Science & Technology Advisory Group for the implementation of the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction UNISDR

Initial draft of the technology framework. Contents. Informal document by the Chair

Global horizon scanning on Science, Technology and Innovation (STI) issues for the post-2015 development agenda

GENEVA COMMITTEE ON DEVELOPMENT AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY (CDIP) Fifth Session Geneva, April 26 to 30, 2010

Written response to the public consultation on the European Commission Green Paper: From

Whole of Society Conflict Prevention and Peacebuilding

TENTATIVE REFLECTIONS ON A FRAMEWORK FOR STI POLICY ROADMAPS FOR THE SDGS

Policy Partnership on Science, Technology and Innovation Strategic Plan ( ) (Endorsed)

How to identify and prioritise research issues?

The Intergovernmental Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES)

Foresight and Scenario Development

DRAFT TEXT on. Version 2 of 9 September 13:00 hrs

Briefing on the preparations for the Oceans Conference

Original: English Rio de Janeiro, Brazil June 2012

The Policy Content and Process in an SDG Context: Objectives, Instruments, Capabilities and Stages

Customising Foresight

General Assembly. United Nations A/63/411. Information and communication technologies for development. I. Introduction. Report of the Second Committee

SIXTH REGIONAL 3R FORUM IN ASIA AND THE PACIFIC, AUGUST 2015, MALE, MALDIVES

Item 4.2 of the Draft Provisional Agenda COMMISSION ON GENETIC RESOURCES FOR FOOD AND AGRICULTURE

G20 Initiative #eskills4girls

November 18, 2011 MEASURES TO IMPROVE THE OPERATIONS OF THE CLIMATE INVESTMENT FUNDS

Agenda Item 4: Transport Strategy: Vision and Objectives

Extract of Advance copy of the Report of the International Conference on Chemicals Management on the work of its second session

Standing Committee on the Law of Patents

The New Delhi Communiqué

Principles and structure of the technology framework and scope and modalities for the periodic assessment of the Technology Mechanism

IV/10. Measures for implementing the Convention on Biological Diversity

Programme. Social Economy. in Västra Götaland Adopted on 19 June 2012 by the regional board, Region Västra Götaland

Reflections on progress made at the fifth part of the second session of the Ad Hoc Working Group on the Durban Platform for Enhanced Action

SBI/SBSTA: Parties move forward on economic diversification and just transition work

Article 6 of UNFCCC & The New Delhi Work Programme. An overview. Laurence Pollier, Programme Officer Article 6 Climate Change Secretariat (UNFCCC)

Technology Executive Committee

AP-FAST: Facility for Accelerating Science & Technology Knowledge Services for SDGs into National Development Plans in Asia and the Pacific

Distinguished Co-facilitators, Ambassadors, delegates and representatives from capitals,

Please send your responses by to: This consultation closes on Friday, 8 April 2016.

United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change UNFCCC EXPERT GROUP ON TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER FIVE YEARS OF WORK

Draft resolution on Science, technology and innovation for. Technology for Development as the United Nations torch-bearer

Goal 14. Geneva, July 2018

CREDITING-RELATED READINESS ACTIVITIES UNDER THE PMR: UPDATE AND SUGGESTED NEXT STEPS

Torsti Loikkanen, Principal Scientist, Research Coordinator VTT Innovation Studies

1. Recognizing that some of the barriers that impede the diffusion of green technologies include:

The Method Toolbox of TA. PACITA Summer School 2014 Marie Louise Jørgensen, The Danish Board of Technology Foundation

Priority Theme 1: Science, Technology and Innovation (STI) for the Post-2015 Agenda

MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE, LIVESTOCK & FISHERIES STATE DEPARTMENT OF FISHERIES AND BLUE ECONOMY

COUNTRY: Questionnaire. Contact person: Name: Position: Address:

The Omani Economic Association Sixth Conference on: Sustainable Development and Equity; Between Planning and Reality

Science, Technology and Innovation for the MDGs and the Post-2015 Development Agenda

Tourism and Sustainable Development Agenda

Towards a Consumer-Driven Energy System

New Strategic Partnerships: Knowledge Frontiers & Enabling Technologies

Science Impact Enhancing the Use of USGS Science

FINLAND. The use of different types of policy instruments; and/or Attention or support given to particular S&T policy areas.

International dimension: resource efficiency in the Sustainable Development Goals

Informal document WP.5 (2016) No. 9

EU-European Arctic Dialogue Seminar Information

WhyisForesight Important for Europe?

Report on the linkage modalities and the rolling workplan of the Technology Executive Committee for

BES. Intergovernmental Science-Policy. Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services

Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD) Common Implementation Strategy (CIS)

THE WIPO DEVELOPMENT AGENDA. New York February 2011

The 45 Adopted Recommendations under the WIPO Development Agenda

Expert group meeting on the science policy interface. Summary. New York, 5 September 2013

United Nations Environment Programme 12 February 2019* Guidance note: Leadership Dialogues at fourth session of the UN Environment Assembly

Terms of Reference. Call for Experts in the field of Foresight and ICT

10246/10 EV/ek 1 DG C II

Satellite Environmental Information and Development Aid: An Analysis of Longer- Term Prospects

70 th World Health Assembly May 2017 MSF Briefing on Medical Research and Development

2010/3 Science and technology for development. The Economic and Social Council,

Research strategy

WIPO Development Agenda

Science and technology for development

ACP/84/047/02 Final Cape Town, 28 July 2002 PAHD Dept. CAPE TOWN DECLARATION ON RESEARCH FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT

PARIS, 7 March 2008 Original: English REPORT BY THE DIRECTOR-GENERAL ON THE UPDATING OF THE EVALUATION OF THE ANTICIPATION AND FORESIGHT PROGRAMME

High level Policy Dialogue on the Strategic Regional Partnership for 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development in Asia and the Pacific

CREATIVE ECONOMY PROGRAMME. Development through Creativity

Social sciences, user engagement and co-production of climate services

Combining Regional Innovation Strategy and Foresight: Experiences with the FOR-RIS approach

MILAN DECLARATION Joining Forces for Investment in the Future of Europe

CO-ORDINATION MECHANISMS FOR DIGITISATION POLICIES AND PROGRAMMES:

STI Roadmaps incorporating SDGs and Implications for Policy and Capacity Building. Klaus Tilmes & Naoto Kanehira World Bank Group November 30, 2017

Report OIE Animal Welfare Global Forum Supporting implementation of OIE Standards Paris, France, March 2018

Transcription:

UN Global Sustainable Development Report 2013 Annotated outline UN/DESA/DSD, New York, 5 February 2013 Note: This is a living document. Feedback welcome! Forewords... 1 Executive Summary... 1 I. Introduction... 2 II. Assessments for sustainable development... 2 A. Mapping of SD assessments and related processes... 2 B. Science digests... 2 C. Emerging issues identified by science... 2 III. Review of progress... 2 A. Sustainable development trends vs. goals suggested by science... 2 B. Trends in policy, institutions and implementation of commitments... 3 C. Making sense of the debate on sustainable development progress... 3 D. Geography of sustainable development progress... 3 IV. Future pathways toward sustainable development... 3 A. If we continue like in the past: a dynamics-as-usual scenario... 3 B. A better world we can achieve: a sustainable development scenario... 4 C. Note on global scenarios at the science-policy interface... 4 D. Lessons-learned and policy solutions... 4 V. Making and measuring progress... 4 A. Input needs and market potentials... 4 B. Follow-up to Rio+20 on the means of implementation... 4 C. Measuring and monitoring progress... 5 VI. Special theme: The climate-land-energy-water-development nexus... 5 A. Rationale and nexus examples... 5 B. National case studies... 5 C. Regional case studies... 5 D. Global case study... 5 E. Towards coherent policy menus... 5 VII. Issues for consideration... 5 References... 6 Annexes... 6 A. Young scientists collaborative group... 6 B. List of experts, reviewers and contributors... 6 C. Briefs of assessments and related processes... 6 D. List of background reports... 6 E. Data tables... 6 F. Web resources... 6 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Forewords [Forewords by SG, USG, DSD, Heads of collaborating agencies (e.g., Executive Secretaries of Regional Commissions), eminent scientists, and assessment initiatives, including a representative of the young scientists collaborative group to this report, as appropriate.] Executive Summary [To be provided by Secretariat and peer-reviewed by all contributors] - 1 -

I. Introduction [The brief introduction will provide the context, mandate, methodology and outline of the report. It includes a guide for various readers and acknowledgements for contributions to the report, as well as a call for contributions to the next report. It will be provided by the Secretariat.] II. Assessments for sustainable development [The overall objective of this chapter is to map the universe of assessments related to sustainable development, in order to provide a quick one-stop entry point for policy makers trying to understand the scientific basis of their decisions.] A. Mapping of SD assessments and related processes [While the focus is on fairly recent scientific assessments, the difficulty in separating politics and science is acknowledged and described. The section will essentially be a summary of selfdescriptions of SD assessments and related processes that will be sought by DESA. The focus is on global assessments, but salient regional and national assessments will be covered to the extent possible. The full text of descriptions will be made available as background documents and put up for public online feedback. Descriptions will follow a common format, covering the institutional set-up (incl. selection of experts and funding), important scientific findings, policy recommendations put forward, and ongoing internal and public debates on the assessment/process. Received descriptions will be edited and - if needed- supplemented with additional info.] B. Science digests [The purpose of this section is to put together concise digests of latest science on selected SD issues of major concern to policy makers, especially at the global level. This will be based on existing digests, such as those by PNAS and PIK, and supplemented by briefs commissioned from scientists. The focus will be in on cross-sectoral, cross-thematic issues of planetary importance only. In particular, the section will include digests of the latest findings on the existence and quantification of potential tipping points and Earth-System-relevant as well as socio-economic elements, with a view of informing the ongoing deliberations on global sustainable development goals.] C. Emerging issues identified by science [Based on the assessments and science-digests above, this section will provide a list of emerging issues as identified by science, with a view to inform policy making. Clearly such list is expected to differ from issues considered emerging by global politics. Such differences will be highlighted, but in a descriptive way. If time permits, the identified list of emerging issues will be put up for feedback by the global science community, e.g., through and online survey, with comments published in full. Again, such list might be important input both for planning the future deliberations of the High-level political forum] III. Review of progress [This chapter might become a standard element of all future editions of the Global SD Report, as it relates closely to a core function of the HLPF. The objective is to provide a comprehensive - yet brief - summary of SD progress from 1950 to 2013, with a specific focus on the past ten years. The chapter will provide a basis for future editions of the Global Sustainable Development Report which might focus on the most recent trends and progress.] A. Sustainable development trends vs. goals suggested by science [This section provides a summary of SD trends. Where appropriate, the trends will be compared with goals suggested by science. The focus will be on the global level, with - 2 -

references to regions or countries where appropriate. It will cover the time period of 1950 to 2013, with a particular focus on the past ten years. The section will follow the approach by Kates and Parris (2003), which was based on NRC (1999) 1, provided an excellent, concise (6 pages) overview of global progress towards sustainable development from 1950-2000, in all its dimensions. Overall results will also be presented in the form of a table covering all six SD quadrants of Kates (2005). Naturally, the section will need to include an overview of SDGs suggested by science. A first draft will be commissioned and peer-reviewed.] B. Trends in policy, institutions and implementation of commitments [This sections sketches important trends in (a) policy making, (b) institutional change and the (c) progress in implementation of commitments. Inputs will be collected from policy assessments, including UN reports. The part on implementation of commitments will draw upon the ground work conducted in preparation for Rio+20 by the UN Secretariat (in particular the SD 21 study on progress and selected issue briefs. Again, the idea is to provide a concise overview of which direction we are heading to, leaving aside specific and sectoral details. The section will take a long-term perspective and review implementation with a focus on progress since 1992 and include selected references to the 1972-1992 time period. In contrast, future editions of this report might provide a scientific review of shorter-term trends and progress against the future SDGs/post-2015 development goals. Being scientific and expert-driven and with a larger scope, such a review would be different from potential future official reports on the official SDGs/post-2015 development goals.] C. Making sense of the debate on sustainable development progress [This section introduces the SD21 framework, in order to organize the ongoing debate on the extent and direction of sustainable development progress. The idea is not to provide an exhaustive account of the debate, but rather dissect the different levels of discussion, in order to systematically show where there is agreement and where not. Different perspectives will be made explicit, with their description based on the consultations and open review of sections A and B above. Note: The five-levels of the SD21 framework include: (i) ultimate goal (views on SD as the ultimate goal); (ii) visions (what to sustain and what to develop); (iii) goals and strategies (themes, goals, targets); (iv) policies, programmes and action plan (pathway characteristics); and (v) implementation (projects, actions, and investments).] D. Geography of sustainable development progress [This section will illustrate the geography of SD progress with the help of instructive maps. It will be based on produced in partnership with ongoing SD geography initiatives, such as that of Lund University. Inequality] IV. Future pathways toward sustainable development [The objective of this chapter is to provide semi-quantitative narratives of future, alternative pathways towards sustainable development ( pathways to a better world in 2050 ) and to contrast them with what would happen, if we continued as we did in the past. The narratives will be fully based on the state-of-the-art of SDG scenario modelling, in particular the scenario work for Rio+20. The chapter s focus will be on the global level, but it will selectively refer to regions, thematic groups of countries, and individual countries where appropriate. Narratives will be reviewed also through and open data, open assumptions process, including a call for modelling contributions.] A. If we continue like in the past: a dynamics-as-usual scenario [This sections provides a semi-quantitative narrative of the future pathway that the world would embark on, if it continues like in the past. It is a dynamics-as-usual scenario for 2010 1 Prepared by the US Academy of Sciences as their informal contribution to Johannesburg. - 3 -

to 2050, as it includes expected improvements and policy changes and not just business as usual. The narrative would be based on scenario model runs. It will focus on the global level, but selectively refer to regions and countries where appropriate. The feasibility of including sub-narratives on special country groups (e.g., LDCs, SIDS, LLDCs, etc.) will be explored. An important result is a description of the sustainable development performance of the world in 2020 and 2030.] B. A better world we can achieve: a sustainable development scenario [This section provides a semi-quantitative narrative of the future pathway towards sustainable development from 2010 to 2050. The narrative would be based on scenario model runs and a list of sustainable development goals used in these model runs. Hence, they are consistent descriptions of what would be possible. An important part of the section will be a description of the trade-offs and synergies that the world will face in its pursuit to simultaneously achieving multiple sustainable development goals. The feasibility of including sub-narratives on special country groups (e.g., LDCs, SIDS, LLDCs, etc.) will be explored. An important result is a description of the achievable sustainable development performance of the world in 2020 and 2030, compared to the dynamics-as-usual scenario.] C. Note on global scenarios at the science-policy interface [This section will provide policy makers with background information and a cautionary note on how to read outputs of global scenario models, what they can say and what not. It will illustrate in which ways scenarios can be used to support decision-making and to identify areas for further scientific research. Among others, the question will be addressed what the most likely world would be in 2050. Most importantly, the potential implications for the policy conclusions of issues and feedbacks not covered in the models will be discussed, in particular the issues of rare events and tipping points. This will include the peace and conflict dimension, including the role of security of natural resources supply.] D. Lessons-learned and policy solutions [This brief concluding section draws lessons and suggests solutions for policy makers that are derived from the above narratives and their underlying global scenario models. Among others, the section will provide an identification of feasible sets of SDGs, in the sense that we know how to achieve them. Other sets might be more desirable, but infeasible with currently known means, due to trade-offs, feedbacks or due to large scale.] V. Making and measuring progress [While chapter IV provides a picture of potential pathways towards sustainable development and feasible endpoints by mid-century, this chapter aims to outline contours of the inputs needed to achieve such desirable future and the potential ways of measuring and monitoring future progress.] A. Input needs and market potentials [The section will outline the minimum inputs in terms of means of implementation (such as science, technology, finance, trade, education and international institutions) that are needed in order to achieve the desirable future outlined in chapter IV. These needs could alternatively be seen as future market potentials.] B. Follow-up to Rio+20 on the means of implementation [The section will provide an update on progress in terms of the means of implementation, whether they have matched actual needs, and in terms of expectations for the future. In particular, inputs will sought from leaders of the follow-up processes to Rio+20, in particular with respect to technology, finance and SDGs.] - 4 -

C. Measuring and monitoring progress [This section will provide a brief overview of the most useful comprehensive means and ways of measuring and monitoring progress toward sustainable development. Inputs will sought from the World Bank and the UN Statistics Division, including on their work on beyond GDP and environmental accounts.] VI. Special theme: The climate-land-energy-water-development nexus [This chapter introduces the special theme for the first session of the High-level Political Forum. To date, no decision has been taken on a theme. However, various senior officials have expressed their interest in the climate-land-energy-water-development nexus.] A. Rationale and nexus examples [This introductory section explains the rationale for the nexus as a useful perspective for coherent policy and planning across sectors. The climate-land-energy-water-development nexus is used as an example, but other thematic clusters are discussed (in lesser detail), depending on inputs received.] B. National case studies [A number of national case studies are presented to highlight the usefulness of the Nexus perspective to implement sustainable development perspectives. Policy solutions identified are compared with alternative ones derived from sectoral or thematic planning approaches, as well as a green economy perspective. In particular, the series of national CLEWS case studies carried out recently will be featured.] C. Regional case studies [A number of regional case studies are presented to highlight the usefulness of the Nexus perspective. Policy solutions identified are compared with alternative ones derived from sectoral/thematic and national planning approaches.] D. Global case study [This section will attempt a mapping/compilation of policy recommendations from sectoral and thematic assessments (including the SD21 studies) and compare them with findings of cross-sectoral/thematic feedbacks. It will highlight trade-offs and synergies at the global level and compared them to national studies. The result is expected to be a call for caution, in that the challenges highlighted in global assessments might require greater efforts and different approaches than implied by global assessments.] E. Towards coherent policy menus [This section will be a modest, first attempt at identifying criteria for policy menus that are coherent across the climate-land-energy-water-development cluster.] VII. Issues for consideration [This concluding chapter will be normative, in contrast to the primarily descriptive main body of the report. The objective is to highlight a number of big issues that arise from the analysis presented in the preceding chapters. It will include policy issues or action items for consideration by policy makers and scientists alike, with a view to strengthen the sciencepolicy interface in the follow-up to Rio+20. In line with the overall report, recommendations will not focus on individual sectors, but on broader thematic clusters and inter-linkages. Issues of intra- and inter-generational equity will be included. In addition to established issues that are currently on the global policy agenda and analyzed by scientific communities, an attempt will be made to also highlight issues that are: (a) rarely on the policy agenda but were - 5 -

identified by scientists as important; and (b) issues on the policy agenda which are rarely subject of in-depth scientific research. Policy issues for consideration will be put forward in the form of options and menus to choose from. Similarly, issues in need of scientific analysis will be directed at an interdisciplinary, scientific audience. In particular, policy-relevant areas will be highlighted for which existing assessments lack an integrated, sustainable development perspective. Details and priorities will emerge upon completion of the aforementioned chapters.] References Annexes A. Young scientists collaborative group [List of young scientists included in the collaborative group.] B. List of experts, reviewers and contributors [List of experts and contributors, including affiliations.] C. Briefs of assessments and related processes [This comprises of a compilation of descriptions of assessments received and edited] D. List of background reports [This provides a list of all official background reports, including those of a regional, thematic and sectoral nature, to be made available on the GSDR Website. The objective of these reports is to highlight the commonalities and differences in sustainable development challenges and progress between regions and among groups of countries with special needs. In particular, all UN Regional Commissions (RCs) and selected UN Specialized Organizations and entities will be encouraged to provide their input. At the same time, it is acknowledged that it is unlikely that a comprehensive list would be received for the first edition. Yet, it will provide a more "bottom up" view of proposed policies and actions -- and some way of testing the level of ambition of policies and actions against what is needed to get us to a desirable state of the world.] E. Data tables [This will include a selection of data tables, providing time series data for both the past trends and the SD narrative.] F. Web resources [List of pointers and Web links, including to the online discussions conducted in preparation of the present report] - 6 -