MASTER DATA MANAGEMENT 7 QUESTIONS TO CONSIDER

Similar documents
Confidently Assess Risk Using Public Records Data with Scalable Automated Linking Technology (SALT)

Object-oriented Analysis and Design

Six Steps to MDM Success

Climate Change Innovation and Technology Framework 2017

ADVANCING KNOWLEDGE. FOR CANADA S FUTURE Enabling excellence, building partnerships, connecting research to canadians SSHRC S STRATEGIC PLAN TO 2020

This document is a preview generated by EVS

STRATEGIC FRAMEWORK Updated August 2017

Terms of Reference. Call for Experts in the field of Foresight and ICT

DoD Information Enterprise Strategic Plan and Roadmap

Digital Medical Device Innovation: A Prescription for Business and IT Success

Information & Communication Technology Strategy

Committee on Development and Intellectual Property (CDIP)

WHAT SMALL AND GROWING BUSINESSES NEED TO SCALE UP

Potential effect on employment in developed and developing countries

What Works Cities Brief: The City Hall Data Gap

National Innovation System of Mongolia

ENGINEERING SERVICES CONSULTANCY

Automated Machine Guidance An Emerging Technology Whose Time has Come?

Score grid for SBO projects with a societal finality version January 2018

2 nd Mileage-Based User Fee Symposium. Transition Issues and Research Needs. Paul Sorensen, RAND Corporation

Using the power of art to heal, inspire, provoke, challenge, offer hope and MOST of all, to connect to remind us of our common humanity.

HP Laboratories. US Labor Rates for Directed Research Activities. Researcher Qualifications and Descriptions. HP Labs US Labor Rates

MedTech Europe position on future EU cooperation on Health Technology Assessment (21 March 2017)

How machines learn in healthcare

Comments of Shared Spectrum Company

Innovative Approaches in Collaborative Planning

Privacy and the EU GDPR US and UK Privacy Professionals

An introduction to software development. Dr. C. Constantinides, P.Eng. Computer Science and Software Engineering Concordia University

National Medical Device Evaluation System: CDRH s Vision, Challenges, and Needs

THE INTELLIGENT REFINERY

Convergence and Differentiation within the Framework of European Scientific and Technical Cooperation on HTA

Agile Non-Agile. Previously on Software Engineering

Gerald G. Boyd, Tom D. Anderson, David W. Geiser

SMART PLACES WHAT. WHY. HOW.

Elements in decision making / planning 4 Decision makers. QUESTIONS - stage A. A3.1. Who might be influenced - whose problem is it?

FUTURE NOW Securing Digital Success

How to write an RFP for website design

2020 Census Update. Presentation to the Council of Professional Associations on Federal Statistics. December 8, 2017

Review of the University vision, ambition and strategy January 2016 Sir David Bell KCB, Vice-Chancellor

The Freelance Surge Is The Industrial Revolution Of Our Time

From the Experts: Ten Tips to Save Costs in Patent Litigation

Score grid for SBO projects with an economic finality version January 2019

Inclusion: All members of our community are welcome, and we will make changes, when necessary, to make sure all feel welcome.

FORUM MEETING #2: JULY 8-9, 2018; SAN FRANCISCO, CA. Forum on Preparing for Automated Vehicles & Shared Mobility

Reduce cost sharing and fees Include other services. Services: which services are covered? Population: who is covered?

December Eucomed HTA Position Paper UK support from ABHI

Opportunities and Challenges for Open Innovation

GOVERNING BODY MEETING in Public 25 April 2018 Agenda Item 3.2

TOURISM INSIGHT FRAMEWORK GENERATING KNOWLEDGE TO SUPPORT SUSTAINABLE TOURISM. IMAGE CREDIT: Miles Holden

10 th APEC TRANSPORTATION MINISTERIAL MEETING 7 th October 2017 Port Moresby, Papua New Guinea Ministerial Statement

Brief to the. Senate Standing Committee on Social Affairs, Science and Technology. Dr. Eliot A. Phillipson President and CEO

Loyola University Maryland Provisional Policies and Procedures for Intellectual Property, Copyrights, and Patents

UNIT VIII SYSTEM METHODOLOGY 2014

IEEE IoT Vertical and Topical Summit - Anchorage September 18th-20th, 2017 Anchorage, Alaska. Call for Participation and Proposals

What We Heard Report Inspection Modernization: The Case for Change Consultation from June 1 to July 31, 2012

Applying Regional Foresight in the BMW Region A Practitioner s Perspective

With you from pit to port. Mining & Metallurgy

Innovation for Defence Excellence and Security (IDEaS)

free library of philadelphia STRATEGIC PLAN

Innovation Management and Technology Adoption. Dr. Mircea Mihaescu, P.Eng. March 7, 2012

Digital Government and Digital Public Services

EXTRAORDINARY EVENTS CALL FOR EXTRAORDINARY DESIGNERS

. Faye Goldman. July Contents

TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR CONSULTANTS

CIVIC EPISTEMOLOGIES Civic Epistemologies: Development of a Roadmap for Citizen Researchers in the age of Digital Culture Workshop on the Roadmap

OPEN CALL FOR NIGHT LIGHTS AS PART OF SINGAPORE NIGHT FESTIVAL 2016

LAW ON TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER 1998

NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Addendum 3 to RFP July 28, 2017

A manifesto for global sustainable health. Sustainable Health Symposium Cambridge, UK 25th July 2017

Improving Application Development with Digital Libraries

Regulatory Science and Innovation: FDA s Role in Transformation of the MCM Enterprise

Ensuring Innovation. By Kevin Richardson, Ph.D. Principal User Experience Architect. 2 Commerce Drive Cranbury, NJ 08512

SMART CITIES Presentation

USING THE INDUSTRIAL INTERNET OF THINGS TO TRANSFORM HUMAN SAFETY AND ENERGY CONSUMPTION IN THE MINING INDUSTRY

2016 Smart Cities Survey Summary Report of Survey Results

Principles and structure of the technology framework and scope and modalities for the periodic assessment of the Technology Mechanism

The Health Informatics Process

Ingham County Request for Proposals Public Safety Radio System Project Manager and Consulting Services Packet #120-18

Analogy Engine. November Jay Ulfelder. Mark Pipes. Quantitative Geo-Analyst

Esri and Autodesk What s Next?

Earth Cube Technical Solution Paper the Open Science Grid Example Miron Livny 1, Brooklin Gore 1 and Terry Millar 2

Case studies on specific organizations will include, but are not limited to, the following elements:

The Impact of Smartphone Technology in Clinical Practice Session 46, March 6, 2018 Dr. Sean P Spina, BScPharm, ACPR, PharmD, FCSHP Clinical Pharmacy

Why, How & What Digital Workplace

Essay Questions. Please review the following list of questions that are categorized by your area of certification. The six areas of certification are:

SALFORD CITY COLLEGE. Case Study ICT S TAT E O F T H E A RT D I G I TA L. SECTOR Education LEARNING EXPERIENCES. SOLUTIONS IT Package

DEFENSE ACQUISITION UNIVERSITY EMPLOYEE SELF-ASSESSMENT. Outcomes and Enablers

GIE response to public consultation Interoperability NC of ENTSOG

Digital Divide and Afghanistan Muhammad Aimal Marjan

Ministry of Industry. Indonesia s 4 th Industrial Revolution. Making Indonesia 4.0. Benchmarking Implementasi Industri 4.0 A.T.

MODELING COMPLEX SOCIO-TECHNICAL ENTERPRISES. William B. Rouse November 13, 2013

Fostering Innovative Ideas and Accelerating them into the Market

Aviation Week Program Excellence Award NGC/IAL. Northrop Grumman Corporation F-35 Integrated Assembly Line

Agenda Item 4: Transport Strategy: Vision and Objectives

Using Technology to Increase the Effectiveness and Efficiency of Community Based Services

It all starts here. Format fermé : 9" x 12" Format ouvert : 18 x 12 Marges : 0,125" Couleurs : CMYK

Technology and Innovation in the NHS Scottish Health Innovations Ltd

Business Plan Summary

The Brand s Pocket Guide to UX & Usability Research

Digitisation Plan

Transcription:

MASTER DATA MANAGEMENT 7 QUESTIONS TO CONSIDER Building Master Data Management Solutions for ACO s: 7 Questions to Consider While healthcare has always been dependent on data, the transition to value-based reimbursement dramatically raises the stakes. Specifically, it requires a degree of integration between data sources that previously was not required under a fee-for services regime. It also raises the ante for data quality. It is not enough to simply bring disparate sources of data together and hope that the inherent variability of the sources is somehow reconciled. To be useful, integrated data must adhere to a common set of standards and nomenclature so that it can be effectively put to work. This is especially critical for Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs). One approach to this issue is the deployment of a Master Data Management system (MDM). An MDM solution allows a healthcare enterprise to standardize and pool critical data into a single database, providing a common point of reference for ACO reporting and management. This white paper discusses 7 questions to consider in preparing for and implementing an MDM for ACOs.

1. Is your data ready? To be effective, an ACO must not only modify clinical operational practices the way care is provided but it also needs to report on the outcomes of these modifications. Did they work? Specifically, were the modifications effective in terms of the requirements of the ACO? A primary source of data to answer these questions resides with payers in the form of claims, eligibility and pharmacy benefits information. While data standards exist for these items, the way they are implemented at the individual payer level is highly variable. Managing this variability is not only labor intensive, but potentially impedes the ability of an ACO to effectively assess its performance. Master Data Management directly addresses the issue of data quality and data variability by introducing processes and technology that standardize and normalize large data sets coming from multiple data sources. These normalized data sets provide the basis for ACO performance analysis and management. 2. Are your people ready? Implementing a Master Data Management solution is both a technical and organizational endeavor. Issues of data stewardship and data governance assume a new level of importance when pooling and transforming data from multiple sources. The MDM needs to reflect both ACO requirements, as well as the practical considerations of the data sources. As a result, an MDM team representing the diverse stakeholders of the organization must be established to oversee the design and implementation of the solution. Additionally, once the MDM is in place, staff and leadership are required to manage the system from both an operational and data stewardship perspective. 3. Do you understand your requirements? Since the primary use case for MDM (at least within the context of an ACO) is providing for data for reporting and other clinical or financial tools, the first step is understanding these requirements. This means bringing together ACO subject matter experts, business owners of third party tools that will consume the MDM data, and IT staff that will be tasked with managing it. MDM service providers can be very helpful in this process by providing an outside, objective perspective. The combination of internal and external teams help facilitate a thorough vetting of the core assumptions and requirements of the project. 4. What tools and services do you need? And where will you get them? An MDM is not an off-the-shelf project. It is highly customized to meet an organization s specific requirements. As a result, an MDM is typically deployed by third party service providers that bring together a unique combination of healthcare domain knowledge, data integration tools and project management skills. Here are some of the characteristics that one should consider in an MDM service provider. 1 - Data Management Solutions

Healthcare domain knowledge and experience: Healthcare is unique, with idiosyncrasies and requirements that will be challenging for service providers with limited healthcare experience. Ideally, your MDM service provider has a grasp on both the technical aspects of the project (data integration and standardization) and organizational needs (defining requirements, data governance and data stewardship). Your service provider should be able to guide you on the subtleties of MDM design & support as well overseeing the technical implementation. Experience with organizations of similar size to yours is also essential from a technical and project perspective. Can they handle your data requirements? Can they manage complex projects with many moving parts? Data tools: The heart of an MDM system is the deployment of sophisticated data tools that are capable of consuming and modifying source data in a manner that meets the project requirements. In contrast to traditional ETL (extract/transfer/load), an MDM system raises the bar in terms of data quality and management. As a result, service providers should have tools that not only offer robust data cleansing and validation, but also means of evaluating data completeness (what data is missing), as well as data lineage and audit tracking (where did the data come from, who has touched it). These tools are necessary for ensuring the quality of incoming data, while providing efficient data management tools when exceptions occur. Programming capability: It is reasonable to assume that not all the myriad requirements of an MDM project will be met by the deployment of established tools. Therefore, it makes sense to contract with MDM service providers capable of developing customized components. This capability helps ensure a robust solution that is fully integrated within the project. Vendor support and agility: Deployment of an MDM is an iterative process requiring dynamic feedback between the healthcare organization and the service provider. This favors smaller, focused service provider teams capable of understanding nuanced and changing requirements with the ability to respond quickly and creatively. Your service provider needs to be agile and innovative enough to successfully support you. Expense: As one evaluates different service providers, it will be critical to get apples to apples proposals so that one can effectively compare costs. This can be challenging if different vendors have pricing models that do not match. A way to manage this is to develop requirements documents that define the end state of the project. Since it is reasonable to assume that an MDM project will have some modifications from the original plan, it is essential to understand how vendors deal with change orders. Data Management Solutions - 2

5. What does implementation look like? How long does it take? While an MDM project will be new to most organizations, the implementation steps are like other IT projects. They include : Defining Requirements: What do you want your system to do? For ACOs, this a complex question that requires a coalescing of financial, organizational, technical and clinical elements. The requirements document is both a vision statement plus a detailed guide to what is necessary to achieve the vision. Requirements should also include staffing for support & maintenance and specifying computing resources to power the MDM solution. Analysis of Existing IT infrastructure: An MDM is an add-on to an existing IT infrastructure, not only consuming and transforming data but also populating third party tools. Mapping the existing systems and how they will interact with the MDM provides a practical guide to deployment. Plan: The plan brings together your findings into a blueprint for deployment. The duration of the project is related to its complexity (i.e. the number of data feeds, variability among data sources, scope of requirements, and the status of the IT infrastructure). Project timelines can vary from 4 to 18 months. An MDM project plan should be a detailed but dynamic document, subject to modifications as issues present themselves during deployment. Implementation: Making the transition from planning to implementation immediately tests all the core assumptions about the project. In the early stages, implementation offers the opportunities to refine and hone working relationships, both internally and with third party service providers. Practical considerations reign, such as providing data access to third party service providers (and completing required paperwork) and overcoming the inevitable system obstacles that are part of probing a complex and secure IT system. Iterations are likely, putting a premium on securing nimble and agile internal teams and external service providers. 3 - Data Management Solutions

6. How much will this project cost? Third Party Service and Software providers: A vendor quote should provide a clear understanding of how it is priced (project vs. hours), what is included (list of services), what is not included and change order management if the scope of the project changes. Additional fees for software and related maintenance should be included. IT Expense: MDM is a processing and storage intensive system that may exceed the capabilities of your current resources. Your MDM service provider should be able help you scope IT requirements so that you can budget and procure. Internal Resources: An MDM project requires internal leadership and active participation of key staff members, particularly in the planning stage where requirements are being scoped and defined. As the heavy lifting of planning transitions to implementation, project leads and staff will need to be allocated to work in concert with third party service providers. Since the plan will be iterative based on implementation activity, overall project leadership needs to remain in place through go-live, ultimately transitioning to an active support mode (data stewardship and governance) charged with maintaining the health and vitality of the MDM system. 7. What is the return on investment? The cost of low quality data is very high. Managing and correcting exceptions is labor intensive and often complex. Persistent data anomalies also undermine confidence in the data and may constrain the organization in its ability to comply with ACO reporting or management requirements. An MDM solution promises higher quality data with less rework, more efficient data management tools and a foundation for improved ACO management and reporting. The net return: lower labor costs for exception handling and more effective performance against ACO contracts. While ultimately it is the success of clinical operations that will determine return on ACO contracts, it is impossible to assess clinical effectiveness without high-quality data. The two are inextricably entwined.

Summary ACOs and other value-based reimbursement methods increase the importance of data quality. However, variability among data sources makes achieving this difficult using traditional ETL (extract, transform, load) methodologies. A Master Data Management system increases the quality of incoming data while providing more efficient data management when exceptions occur. Deploying an MDMS system is both a technical and organization endeavor that involves internal project leadership, careful requirements planning among the various stakeholders, and a clear understanding of the existing IT infrastructure. MDM service providers can assist in both the planning and implementation process. Services providers should have rich healthcare domain expertise in addition to technical capabilities. Additionally, they should be both nimble and technically creative in response to both challenges and obstacles that can occur within the project. Master Data Management provides a return on investment by lowering the cost of managing data quality issues and by increasing the ability of the organization to effectively monitor and report on ACO related performance objectives. If you are interested in a more technical discussion or scoping of your conversion project, we urge you to contact Steve Buttitta of Byte Sized Solutions at sbuttitta@bytesizedsolutions.com Steve Buttitta President 5 - Data Management Solutions Byte Sized Solutions Headquarters 8318 Lochlaven Lane Chapel Hill, NC 27516 Tel: 773.859.7172 Fax: 773.435.6673 sales@bytesizedsolutions.com