Ka Band Channelized Receiver

Similar documents
US Army Research Laboratory and University of Notre Dame Distributed Sensing: Hardware Overview

Thermal Simulation of a Silicon Carbide (SiC) Insulated-Gate Bipolar Transistor (IGBT) in Continuous Switching Mode

ARL-TN-0835 July US Army Research Laboratory

Simulation Comparisons of Three Different Meander Line Dipoles

ARL-TN-0743 MAR US Army Research Laboratory

Thermal Simulation of Switching Pulses in an Insulated Gate Bipolar Transistor (IGBT) Power Module

Evaluation of the ETS-Lindgren Open Boundary Quad-Ridged Horn

Effects of Fiberglass Poles on Radiation Patterns of Log-Periodic Antennas

Acoustic Change Detection Using Sources of Opportunity

Gaussian Acoustic Classifier for the Launch of Three Weapon Systems

Validated Antenna Models for Standard Gain Horn Antennas

Ultrasonic Nonlinearity Parameter Analysis Technique for Remaining Life Prediction

Electronic Warfare Closed Loop Laboratory (EWCLL) Antenna Motor Software and Hardware Development

Effects of Radar Absorbing Material (RAM) on the Radiated Power of Monopoles with Finite Ground Plane

Remote-Controlled Rotorcraft Blade Vibration and Modal Analysis at Low Frequencies

Digital Radiography and X-ray Computed Tomography Slice Inspection of an Aluminum Truss Section

A Cognitive Agent for Spectrum Monitoring and Informed Spectrum Access

Summary: Phase III Urban Acoustics Data

ARL-TR-7455 SEP US Army Research Laboratory

Physics Based Analysis of Gallium Nitride (GaN) High Electron Mobility Transistor (HEMT) for Radio Frequency (RF) Power and Gain Optimization

0.15-µm Gallium Nitride (GaN) Microwave Integrated Circuit Designs Submitted to TriQuint Semiconductor for Fabrication

Feasibility Study for ARL Inspection of Ceramic Plates Final Report - Revision: B

Capacitive Discharge Circuit for Surge Current Evaluation of SiC

Holography at the U.S. Army Research Laboratory: Creating a Digital Hologram

USAARL NUH-60FS Acoustic Characterization

Simultaneous-Frequency Nonlinear Radar: Hardware Simulation

IREAP. MURI 2001 Review. John Rodgers, T. M. Firestone,V. L. Granatstein, M. Walter

Characterizing Operational Performance of Rotary Subwoofer Loudspeaker

A Novel Approach for Making Dynamic Range Measurements in Radio Frequency Front Ends for Software Controlled Radio Architectures

Evaluation of Bidirectional Silicon Carbide Solid-State Circuit Breaker v3.2

Thermal Simulation of a Diode Module Cooled with Forced Convection

Super-Resolution for Color Imagery

Characteristics of an Optical Delay Line for Radar Testing

RCS Measurements of a PT40 Remote Control Plane at Ka-Band

A Comparison of Two Computational Technologies for Digital Pulse Compression

Army Acoustics Needs

DIELECTRIC ROTMAN LENS ALTERNATIVES FOR BROADBAND MULTIPLE BEAM ANTENNAS IN MULTI-FUNCTION RF APPLICATIONS. O. Kilic U.S. Army Research Laboratory

REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE

Coherent distributed radar for highresolution

Hybrid QR Factorization Algorithm for High Performance Computing Architectures. Peter Vouras Naval Research Laboratory Radar Division

Signal Processing Architectures for Ultra-Wideband Wide-Angle Synthetic Aperture Radar Applications

Spectral Discrimination of a Tank Target and Clutter Using IBAS Filters and Principal Component Analysis

A HIGH-PRECISION COUNTER USING THE DSP TECHNIQUE

Spectrum Monitoring Using SpectrumAnalysis LabVIEW Software, Nanoceptors, and Various Digitizing Solutions

MINIATURIZED ANTENNAS FOR COMPACT SOLDIER COMBAT SYSTEMS

Methodology for Designing and Developing a New Ultra-Wideband Antenna Based on Bio-Inspired Optimization Techniques

Strategic Technical Baselines for UK Nuclear Clean-up Programmes. Presented by Brian Ensor Strategy and Engineering Manager NDA

Investigation of a Forward Looking Conformal Broadband Antenna for Airborne Wide Area Surveillance

Analysis of MEMS-based Acoustic Particle Velocity Sensor for Transient Localization

AFRL-RY-WP-TR

Performance Comparison of Top and Bottom Contact Gallium Arsenide (GaAs) Solar Cell

Infrared Imaging of Power Electronic Components

0.18 μm CMOS Fully Differential CTIA for a 32x16 ROIC for 3D Ladar Imaging Systems

Presentation to TEXAS II

Innovative 3D Visualization of Electro-optic Data for MCM

Computational Fluid Dynamic (CFD) Study of an Articulating Turbine Blade Cascade

Performance Assessment: University of Michigan Meta- Material-Backed Patch Antenna

Non-Data Aided Doppler Shift Estimation for Underwater Acoustic Communication

August 9, Attached please find the progress report for ONR Contract N C-0230 for the period of January 20, 2015 to April 19, 2015.

Loop-Dipole Antenna Modeling using the FEKO code

Calibration Data for the Leaky Coaxial Cable as a Transmitting Antenna for HEMP Shielding Effectiveness Testing

Best Practices for Technology Transition. Technology Maturity Conference September 12, 2007

Quadrifilar Helix Antenna for Enhanced Air-to- Ground Communications

ULTRASTABLE OSCILLATORS FOR SPACE APPLICATIONS

VHF/UHF Imagery of Targets, Decoys, and Trees

Experimental Observation of RF Radiation Generated by an Explosively Driven Voltage Generator

COM DEV AIS Initiative. TEXAS II Meeting September 03, 2008 Ian D Souza

Two-Way Time Transfer Modem

RCS Measurements and High-Range Resolution Profiles of Three RPGs at Ka-Band

ADVANCED CONTROL FILTERING AND PREDICTION FOR PHASED ARRAYS IN DIRECTED ENERGY SYSTEMS

REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE. A peer-to-peer non-line-of-sight localization system scheme in GPS-denied scenarios. Dr.

Conversion of Radio-Frequency Pulses to Continuous-Wave Sinusoids by Fast Switching and Narrowband Filtering

Reconfigurable RF Systems Using Commercially Available Digital Capacitor Arrays

Active Denial Array. Directed Energy. Technology, Modeling, and Assessment

REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE. Thermal transport and measurement of specific heat in artificially sculpted nanostructures. Dr. Mandar Madhokar Deshmukh

AFRL-SN-WP-TM

Lensless Synthetic Aperture Chirped Amplitude-Modulated Laser Radar for Microsystems

14. Model Based Systems Engineering: Issues of application to Soft Systems

Ship echo discrimination in HF radar sea-clutter

Report Documentation Page

Frequency Stabilization Using Matched Fabry-Perots as References

Future Trends of Software Technology and Applications: Software Architecture

PSEUDO-RANDOM CODE CORRELATOR TIMING ERRORS DUE TO MULTIPLE REFLECTIONS IN TRANSMISSION LINES

Underwater Intelligent Sensor Protection System

Acoustic Localization of Transient Signals with Wind Compensation

Adaptive CFAR Performance Prediction in an Uncertain Environment

REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE

Radar Detection of Marine Mammals

Lattice Spacing Effect on Scan Loss for Bat-Wing Phased Array Antennas

Wafer Level Antenna Design at 20 GHz

Report Documentation Page

AFRL-RX-WP-TP

BIOGRAPHY ABSTRACT. This paper will present the design of the dual-frequency L1/L2 S-CRPA and the measurement results of the antenna elements.

REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE

PULSED POWER SWITCHING OF 4H-SIC VERTICAL D-MOSFET AND DEVICE CHARACTERIZATION

INTEGRATIVE MIGRATORY BIRD MANAGEMENT ON MILITARY BASES: THE ROLE OF RADAR ORNITHOLOGY

REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE

SA Joint USN/USMC Spectrum Conference. Gerry Fitzgerald. Organization: G036 Project: 0710V250-A1

Improved Performance of Silicon Carbide Detector Using Double Layer Anti Reflection (AR) Coating

REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE

Transcription:

ARL-TR-7446 SEP 2015 US Army Research Laboratory Ka Band Channelized Receiver by John T Clark, Andre K Witcher, and Eric D Adler Approved for public release; distribution unlilmited.

NOTICES Disclaimers The findings in this report are not to be construed as an official Department of the Army position unless so designated by other authorized documents. Citation of manufacturer s or trade names does not constitute an official endorsement or approval of the use thereof. Destroy this report when it is no longer needed. Do not return it to the originator.

ARL-TR-7446 SEP 2015 US Army Research Laboratory Ka Band Channelized Receiver by John T Clark, Andre K Witcher, and Eric D Adler Sensors and Electron Devices Directorate, ARL Approved for public release; distribution unlimited.

REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing the burden, to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports (0704-0188), 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. PLEASE DO NOT RETURN YOUR FORM TO THE ABOVE ADDRESS. 1. REPORT DATE (DD-MM-YYYY) Sep 2015 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE Ka Band Channelized Receiver 2. REPORT TYPE Final 3. DATES COVERED (From - To) 5a. CONTRACT NUMBER 5b. GRANT NUMBER 5c. PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER 6. AUTHOR(S) John T Clark, Andre K Witcher, and Eric D Adler 5d. PROJECT NUMBER 5e. TASK NUMBER 5f. WORK UNIT NUMBER 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER US Army Research Laboratory ATTN: RDRL-SER-M ARL-TR-7446 2800 Powder Mill Road Adelphi, MD 20783-1138 9. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSOR/MONITOR'S ACRONYM(S) 11. SPONSOR/MONITOR'S REPORT NUMBER(S) 12. DISTRIBUTION/AVAILABILITY STATEMENT Approved for public release; distribution unlimited. 13. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES 14. ABSTRACT The design of a 30-channel Ka band receiver is described in detail including both the radio frequency (RF) down-conversion architecture and the digital signal processing platform to be used. The system, which is composed entirely of commercial-offthe-shelf (COTS) components, is capable of covering 44% of the entire Ka band including the Future Combat Systems Radar and Communications Band in real time with the capability of determining the input signal spectrum location. 15. SUBJECT TERMS Channelization, Ka band, receiver 16. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF: a. REPORT b. ABSTRACT c. THIS PAGE Unclassified Unclassified Unclassified 17. LIMITATION OF ABSTRACT UU 18. NUMBER OF PAGES 18 19a. NAME OF RESPONSIBLE PERSON John T Clark 19b. TELEPHONE NUMBER (Include area code) 301-394-3800 Standard Form 298 (Rev. 8/98) Prescribed by ANSI Std. Z39.18 ii

Contents List of Figures List of Tables iv iv 1. Introduction 1 2. Approach 1 3. RF Design and RF Parts 2 3.1 Ka Antenna 4 3.2 Ka LNA 4 3.3 Ka Mixer 4 3.4 Power Divider 5 3.5 Baseband Mixer 5 3.6 Baseband Amplifier 5 3.7 Local Oscillators 5 4. Signal Processing Design 6 4.1 National Instruments (NI) Digitizer 6 4.2 Digital Filtering 8 5. Conclusion 9 List of Symbols, Abbreviations, and Acronyms 10 Distribution List 11 iii

List of Figures Fig. 1 RF schematic (note the reference distribution network is shown in lower left corner)...3 Fig. 2 Real-time system processes and integration plan...4 Fig. 3 PXIe-5171R 8-channel reconfigurable oscilloscope (reproduced with permission)...7 Fig. 4 PXIe-1085 18 slot chassis (reproduced with permission)...7 Fig. 5 Real-time system process and integration plan incorporating FIR filter banks...8 List of Tables Table 1 Scope correlation index for the detection input frequency...2 Table 2 Parts list for the RF components...3 Table 3 Signal processing cost estimates...9 iv

1. Introduction For electronic warfare (EW) requirements covering the Ka band spectrum, a channelized receiver is highly desirable. Additionally the Future Combat Systems (FCS) Radar and Communications allocations reside in this band of the spectrum. This report defines a first-order system analysis of constructing an analog radio frequency (RF) channelized receiver that converts the spectrum from 34 to 40 GHz into thirty 200-MHz channels. The RF design caters to the state of the art in digital signal processing hardware and software algorithms. RF commercial-off-the-shelf (COTS) parts are selected in order to develop a system baseline for size, weight, power, and cost requirements (SWaP-C). Data acquisition of the selected Ka band span is accomplished by translating each 200-MHz channel down to a common intermediate frequency (IF) and sampling with a multi-channel reconfigurable oscilloscope from a National Instruments (NI) PXI platform. 2. Approach The NI digitizer PXIe-5171R is a 14-bit, 8-channel reconfigurable oscilloscope with 300 MHz of analog bandwidth per channel. This signal processing architecture is capable of sampling eight 200-MHz channels simultaneously. Four of these cards allow a design that covers the full spectrum where the sampling occurs at a common IF from 100 300 MHz in all 30 channels. The processing algorithm, channel, and card position within the PXIe chassis determines the detected input frequency. Table 1 provides a correlation index between the detection input frequency and an applied frequency offset generated with a coherent array of external phase locked dielectric resonator oscillators (EPLDROs). 1

Table 1 Scope correlation index for the detection input frequency Card Channel Offset (GHz) Input Frequency (GHz) 1 1 33.9 34.0 34.2 1 2 34.1 34.2 34.4 1 3 34.3 34.4 34.6 1 4 34.5 34.6 34.8 1 5 34.7 34.8 35.0 1 6 34.9 35.0 35.2 1 7 35.1 35.2 35.4 1 8 35.3 35.4 35.6 2 1 35.5 35.6 35.8 2 2 35.7 35.8 36.0 2 3 35.9 36.0 36.2 2 4 36.1 36.2 36.4 2 5 36.2 36.4 36.6 2 6 36.3 36.6 36.8 2 7 36.5 36.8 37.0 2 8 36.7 37.0 37.2 3 1 36.9 37.2 37.4 3 2 37.1 37.4 37.6 3 3 37.3 37.6 37.8 3 4 37.5 37.8 38.0 3 5 37.7 38.0 38.2 3 6 37.9 38.2 38.4 3 7 38.1 38.4 38.6 3 8 38.3 38.6 38.8 4 1 38.5 38.8 39.0 4 2 38.7 39.0 39.2 4 3 38.9 39.2 39.4 4 4 39.1 39.4 39.6 4 5 39.3 39.6 39.8 4 6 39.5 39.8 40.0 3. RF Design and RF Parts The total spectrum bandwidth from 34 to 40 GHz is received with a COTS antenna and low-noise amplifier (LNA), followed by down-conversion to a 2 8 GHz IF, where the channelization takes place through COTS power dividers. The LNA has sufficient gain that the overall receiver noise figure is not degraded by subsequent components and its noise figure, when added to the thermal noise, is the minimum detectable signal. Each channel is further down-converted into a common IF 2

(100 300 MHz) through the coherent array of ERDROs. Figure 1 illustrates the RF components needed to perform this action. These components are detailed below. All filtering is performed digitally. Table 2 lists the total RF parts cost, size, and power requirements. It is expected that all RF hardware, including power supplies, can be integrated into a 19-inch rack that is 24 inches deep and 4 inches high. RF TEST PORT S2-1 M2-1 A2-1 ANT 34-40 GHz A1 M1 2-8 GHz R I L 1:8 S1-1 1:4 R I L O2-1 1.9 GHz TO CARD 1, Channel 1 (All CARDS, All Channels 100 MHz to 300 MHz) S1-2 O3 200 MHz IRDRO 1:8 REFERENCE TEST PORT A2-31 A2-38 1:4 O1 S2-9 O1 32 GHz O2-1 O2-2 O2-3 S2-16 O2-28 1:4 02-29 02-30 1:4 S2-8 RFTEST PORT M2-30 R I L O2-30 7.5 GHz A2-30 TO CARD 4, Channel 6 Fig. 1 RF schematic (note the reference distribution network is shown in lower left corner) Table 2 Parts list for the RF components Part Make Model Qty Unit Cost Total Cost Size (L X W X H) in Vdc (V) Idc(A) Pdc(W) ANT Quinstar QWH-Ka 1 $1,450.00 $1,450.00 4.2 X 1.87 X1.87 0 0 0 A1 Miteq JS44-18004000-33-8P 1 $2,850.00 $2,850.00 0.74X 0.93 X 0.35 15 0.4 6 O1 Lucix ERDRO (32 GHz) 1 $2,175.00 $2,175.00 2 X 1.883 X 0.652 15 0.2 3 M1 Miteq TB0440LW1 1 $795.00 $795.00 0.52 X 0.56 X0.29 0 0 0 S1 MCL ZN8PD-113+ 2 $300.00 $600.00 6.6 X 3.28 X 0.75 0 0 0 S2 Crane PDM-44M-10G 16 $525.00 $8,400.00 2 X 2 X 0.38 0 0 0 O2 Lucix ERDRO (1.9:0.2:7.5) 30 $795.00 $23,850.00 2 X 1.883 X 0.652 15 0.325 146.25 M2 MCL ZX05-ED12902/7 30 $350.00 $10,500.00 0.75 X 0.9 X 0.54 0 0 0 A2 MCL ZKL-2+ 38 $139.95 $5,318.10 1.5 X 1.38 X 0.5 12 0.12 54.72 O3 Lucix IRDRO (200 MHz) 1 $1,350.00 $1,350.00 2 X 1.883 X 1.28 12 0.67 8.04 TOTAL 120 $57,288.10 218.01 V and I are per unit quantities, Power is for QtyUnit (VI) Note: MCL=Mini-Circuits, Crane is the owner of the formerly Merrimac products; L3 Communications is the owner of the formerly MITEQ products. 3

3.1 Ka Antenna Quinstar s QWH-Ka model covers 26.5 to 40 GHz with a max voltage standing wave ratio (VSWR) of 1:10:1 and a gain of 21 db in a conical form factor (24 db in a pyramidal form factor). The conical version is shown in Fig. 2. Fig. 2 Real-time system processes and integration plan 3.2 Ka LNA MITEQ s JS44-18004000-33-8P has at least 48 db of gain from 18 to 40 GHz a maximum noise figure of 3.3 db and an output 1-dB compression point (1dBCO) of +8 dbm. It consumes 6 W of DC power. The compression power referred to the input requires input signals to be no greater than 40 dbm. 3.3 Ka Mixer MITEQ s TB044LW1 triple balanced mixer can mix RF input signals from 34 to 40 GHz with a local oscillator (LO) to produce IF outputs anywhere between 500 MHz to 20 GHz. The conversion loss is at most 13 db (the overall gain is now 35 db). Using a single ERDRO at 32 GHz, the input range of 34 to 40 GHz is downconverted to 2 to 8 GHz and then presented for channelization. 4

3.4 Power Divider Thirty channels are created by dividing the input 32 ways, which provides 2 extra ports that can be used as test ports or terminated (channels 7 and 8 on card 4). To avoid custom parts, the 32-way division is accomplished with 1 COTS 8-way divider followed by 8 COTS 4-way dividers: Mini Circuit s ZN8PD-113+ and Crane s PDM-44M-10G, respectively. They have insertion losses of 11.9 and 8 db, respectively (the overall gain is now 15.1dB). 3.5 Baseband Mixer There are 30 instances of this mixer: Mini-Circuits ZX05-ED12902/7, which has a typical conversion loss of 6 db (the overall gain is now 9.1 db). These mixers are mated with a series of offset ERDROs that mix all inputs down to 100 to 300 MHz. The first ERDRO is at 1.9 GHz, the next steps by 200 MHz to 2.1 GHz, and so on until the last one, which is at 7.5 GHz. The frequency offset, shown in Table 1, is the sum of the first 32-GHz ERDRO and the second ERDRO used at the baseband mixer (i.e., for card 1, channel 1, 32 GHz+1.9 GHz=33.9 GHz). For the test ports, there is no baseband mixing, so the frequency offset is simply 32 GHz. 3.6 Baseband Amplifier There are 30 instances of this amplifier, a Mini-Circuits ZKL-2+, which has a minimum gain of 31 db, a 1dBCO of +16.4 db, and a noise figure of 3.5 db. This is the last component in the receiver before presentation to the PXI card channels. At this point, the overall gain is 40.1 db, the overall noise figure is 3.83 db, and the receiver compresses for all input signals above 40 dbm. This maximum input signal is amplified to approximately 0 dbm at the signal processor input. The signal processor has an effective number of bits of at least 10.2, so a dynamic range of at least 61 db is achievable. 3.7 Local Oscillators Lucix s EPLDROs provide the best phase noise performance and accuracy available to drive the mixers. All units lock to a 200-MHz reference that is provided by an internal reference DRO (IRDRO). The IRDRO determines the phase noise of the EPLDRO. The IRDRO has the following phase noise characteristics: at a 100-Hz offset = 94 dbc/hz, at a 1-kHz offset = 119 dbm/hz, at a 10-kHz offset = 129 dbm/hz, 5

at a 100-kHz offset = 140 dbc/hz, and at a 1-MHz offset = 144 dbc/hz. This reference uses another 8-way divider followed by 8 baseband amplifiers and then 8 more 4-way dividers to distribute the reference at an appropriate level to all 31 ERDROs. The remaining port is a test port to verify the presence and strength of the reference. There is one 32-GHz ERDRO and 30 ERDROs ranging from at 1.9 to 7.5 GHz in 200-MHz steps. See Table 2 for a parts list for the RF design. 4. Signal Processing Design Figure 2 depicts the system process flow from the 100 to 300 MHz, baseband IF through an 8-channel x 4 digitizer cards, for a total of 30 dedicated channels, each with a bandwidth of 200 MHz. Each channel converts the incoming signal to 14-bit digital words for further system processing. Those processes consist of frequency, time-domain analysis, threshold and level detection protocols, or other user-defined processes. 4.1 National Instruments (NI) Digitizer The PXIe-5171R, shown in Fig. 3, is a 14-bit, 8-channel reconfigurable oscilloscope with 300 MHz of analog bandwidth per channel. A reconfigurable oscilloscope means that the scope s embedded software can be replaced by a custom real-time instrument design for customized real-time signal analysis running on a field-programmable gate array (FPGA). This gives the user the flexibility of performing system and signal processing tasks deterministically, which minimizes the dead time and overhead constraints usually associated with a modern central processing unit (CPU) or embedded software. Four digitizer cards are needed to meet the 30-channel requirements. The digitizer samples signals at a rate of 250 MS/s per channel simultaneously. The spurious free dynamic range (SFDR) is specified at 70 dbc. The digitizer effective number of bits (ENOBs) is specified at 10.2 bits. From the ENOB specification, the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) for the digitizer can be calculated as 6 db per bit for a 61-dB SNR. 6

Fig. 3 PXIe-5171R 8-channel reconfigurable oscilloscope (reproduced with permission) The 5171R has a 3.2-GB/s throughput rate when installed in a NI PXIe-1085 chassis, depicted in Fig. 4. The 1085 is an 18-slot chassis with 16 hybrid slots, which mean that other modules outside of the NI product family can be incorporated to take advantage of their capability to expand the overall user capability of the system. Two slots are reserved for the system controller to be determined (TBD). The overall system bandwidth of the chassis is 12 GB/s. Fig. 4 PXIe-1085 18 slot chassis (reproduced with permission) Once the incoming baseband signal is detected and processed, further analysis can be performed in determining, for example, the frequency of the detected signal by measuring the offset of signal and adding it to the frequency of the LO for that channel. If, for example, a signal is present in card 3, channel 1 of the system at 7

210 MHz, the offset frequency (determined by a lookup-word derived from Table 1) of 36.9 GHz would be added to 210 MHz yielding 37.11 GHz as the received input signal frequency. Other system parameters can be measured and functions performed depending on user requirements. 4.2 Digital Filtering To further mitigate the components of SWaP-C, it is proposed that all filtering be performed in software after down-conversion to baseband. Through the use of inband finite impulse response (FIR) filter banks, as depicted in Fig. 5 as FL1 to FL30, the signal appearing in that pre-configured and dedicated band would be processed to determine, for example, the center frequency of that signal and also any other parameter defined by the user. Each filter would be band passed to tightly filter 100 to 300 MHz while excluding all other frequencies. Adjacent channels would mix into the DC 100 or 300 MHz and above range, thus the channel selectivity would be accomplished at this point via the FIR filters. This would also serve to mitigate false alarms. Each of these bands could be further subdivided for further signal identification and classification queries. The signal processing cost estimates are provided in Table 3. Fig. 5 Real-time system process and integration plan incorporating FIR filter banks 8

Table 3 Signal processing cost estimates Manufacturer Type Part No. Qty Cost Total NI ADC/Digitizer PXIe-5171R 4 11,999.00 $47,996.00 NI Chassis PXIe-1085 1 8,999.00 $8,999.00 NI System Controller PXIe-8135 1 6,149.00 $6,149.00 $63,144.00 Note: Software TBD. 5. Conclusion A market analysis and design study was conducted to determine the feasibility of implementing an EW requirement for a Ka band channelized receiver with a spectrum coverage from 34 to 40 GHz in thirty 200-MHz-wide bands. The market analysis revealed that a COTS implementation to meet the requirement would be a most practical and cost-effective solution. The estimated hardware cost of the baseline design, which includes the RF framework and digital signal processing unit, would be approximately $125K. The complete size and weight would be dependent on the integration, power requirements, final assembly, and packaging of the complete system. The system would consume approximately 1.5 kw of AC power. Higher levels of RF integration could be achieved to shrink the system, yet it would involve a nonrecurring engineering (NRE) investment. The cascade analog RF analysis yields a maximum signal of 40 dbm and a thermal noise floor of 91 dbm (with a 200-MHz final IF). Adding a system noise figure of 3.5 db raises that floor to 87.5 dbm. Thus, the analog dynamic range is 47.5 db across the selected 6 GHz of the Ka band. However, the digital signal processing has a dynamic range of 61 db, thus approximately 13.5 db of processing gain is expected from the channelized receiver. 9

List of Symbols, Abbreviations, and Acronyms 1dBCO COTS CPU ENOBs EPLDROs EW FIR IF IRDRO LNA LO NI NRE RF SFDR SNR SWaP-C TBD VSWR Output 1-dB compression point commercial-off-the-shelf central processing unit effective number of bits external phase locked dielectric resonator oscillators electronic warfare finite impulse response intermediate frequency internal reference Dielectric Resonator Oscillator low-noise amplifier local oscillator National Instruments non-recurring engineering radio frequency spurious free dynamic range signal-to-noise ratio size, weight, power, and cost to be determined voltage standing wave ratio 10

1 DEFENSE TECHNICAL (PDF) INFORMATION CTR DTIC OCA 2 DIRECTOR (PDF) US ARMY RSRCH LAB RDRL CIO LL RDRL IMAL HRA RECORDS MGMT 1 GOVT PRINTG OFC (PDF) A MALHOTRA 3 DIRECTOR (PDF) US ARMY RSRCH LAB RDRL SER M JOHN T CLARK ANDRE K WITCHER ERIC D ADLER 11

INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK. 12