Cooperative versus Full-Duplex Communication in Cellular Networks: A Comparison of the Total Degrees of Freedom. Amr El-Keyi and Halim Yanikomeroglu

Similar documents
Interference Alignment for Heterogeneous Full-Duplex Cellular Networks. Amr El-Keyi and Halim Yanikomeroglu

Interference Alignment for Heterogeneous Full-duplex Cellular Networks

Cloud-Based Cell Associations

Analog and Digital Self-interference Cancellation in Full-Duplex MIMO-OFDM Transceivers with Limited Resolution in A/D Conversion

Lecture LTE (4G) -Technologies used in 4G and 5G. Spread Spectrum Communications

MIMO Systems and Applications

Interference Management in Two Tier Heterogeneous Network

Interference Management in Wireless Networks

3G Evolution. Outline. Chapter: Multi-antenna configurations. Introduction. Introduction. Multi-antenna techniques. Multiple receiver antennas, SIMO

Chapter 10. User Cooperative Communications

Coordinated Multi-Point Transmission for Interference Mitigation in Cellular Distributed Antenna Systems

Asymptotic Analysis of Full-Duplex Bidirectional MIMO Link with Transmitter Noise

Full-Duplex Communications for Wireless Links with Asymmetric Capacity Requirements

Massive MIMO Full-duplex: Theory and Experiments

EE360: Lecture 6 Outline MUD/MIMO in Cellular Systems

Multi-Input Multi-Output Systems (MIMO) Channel Model for MIMO MIMO Decoding MIMO Gains Multi-User MIMO Systems

MATLAB COMMUNICATION TITLES

Full-Duplex Non-Orthogonal Multiple Access for Modern Wireless Networks

Adaptive Modulation, Adaptive Coding, and Power Control for Fixed Cellular Broadband Wireless Systems: Some New Insights 1

PERFORMANCE OF TWO-PATH SUCCESSIVE RELAYING IN THE PRESENCE OF INTER-RELAY INTERFERENCE

Performance of Amplify-and-Forward and Decodeand-Forward

5G: Opportunities and Challenges Kate C.-J. Lin Academia Sinica

Aalborg Universitet. Emulating Wired Backhaul with Wireless Network Coding Thomsen, Henning; Carvalho, Elisabeth De; Popovski, Petar

MIMO I: Spatial Diversity

arxiv: v2 [cs.it] 29 Mar 2014

ISSN Vol.03,Issue.17 August-2014, Pages:

Communications Theory and Engineering

Multiple Antennas. Mats Bengtsson, Björn Ottersten. Basic Transmission Schemes 1 September 8, Presentation Outline

On the Value of Coherent and Coordinated Multi-point Transmission

Background: Cellular network technology

Non-Orthogonal Multiple Access (NOMA) in 5G Cellular Downlink and Uplink: Achievements and Challenges

ELEC E7210: Communication Theory. Lecture 11: MIMO Systems and Space-time Communications

Lecture 8 Multi- User MIMO

MIMO in 4G Wireless. Presenter: Iqbal Singh Josan, P.E., PMP Director & Consulting Engineer USPurtek LLC

Beamforming for 4.9G/5G Networks

Beamforming on mobile devices: A first study

CDMA & WCDMA (UMTS) AIR INTERFACE. ECE 2526-WIRELESS & CELLULAR COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS Monday, June 25, 2018

Power and Bandwidth Allocation in Cooperative Dirty Paper Coding

What is the Role of MIMO in Future Cellular Networks: Massive? Coordinated? mmwave?

Resource Allocation in Full-Duplex Communications for Future Wireless Networks

LTE-A Carrier Aggregation Enhancements in Release 11

Interference: An Information Theoretic View

On the Capacity Regions of Single-Channel and Multi-Channel Full-Duplex Links. Jelena Marašević and Gil Zussman EE department, Columbia University

Location Aware Wireless Networks

Smart Scheduling and Dumb Antennas

Spectrum Efficiency for Future Wireless Communications

Analysis of massive MIMO networks using stochastic geometry

IJSRD - International Journal for Scientific Research & Development Vol. 4, Issue 03, 2016 ISSN (online):

Full-Duplex Cellular Networks: It Works!

Interference Model for Cognitive Coexistence in Cellular Systems

Relay Scheduling and Interference Cancellation for Quantize-Map-and-Forward Cooperative Relaying

Coordinated Multi-Point (CoMP) Transmission in Downlink Multi-cell NOMA Systems: Models and Spectral Efficiency Performance

In-band Full Duplex Radios and System Performance

Technical Aspects of LTE Part I: OFDM

Addressing Future Wireless Demand

Interference Mitigation by MIMO Cooperation and Coordination - Theory and Implementation Challenges

Testing Carrier Aggregation in LTE-Advanced Network Infrastructure

Interference management Within 3GPP LTE advanced

Wireless Systems Laboratory Stanford University Pontifical Catholic University Rio de Janiero Oct. 13, 2011

Degrees of Freedom of Multi-hop MIMO Broadcast Networks with Delayed CSIT

Demo: Non-classic Interference Alignment for Downlink Cellular Networks

Opportunistic Communication in Wireless Networks

Division Free Duplex in Small Form Factors. Leo Laughlin,ChunqingZhang, Mark Beach, Kevin Morris, and John Haine

Channel Estimation for Downlink LTE System Based on LAGRANGE Polynomial Interpolation

Breaking Spectrum Gridlock With Cognitive Radios: An Information Theoretic Perspective

System Performance of Cooperative Massive MIMO Downlink 5G Cellular Systems

Cooperative Relaying Scheme for Orthogonal Frequency and Code Division Multiple Access Uplink System

Beamforming and Binary Power Based Resource Allocation Strategies for Cognitive Radio Networks

#8 Adaptive Modulation Coding

EasyChair Preprint. A User-Centric Cluster Resource Allocation Scheme for Ultra-Dense Network

Dynamic Frequency Hopping in Cellular Fixed Relay Networks

Reference Receiver Based Digital Self-Interference Cancellation in MIMO Full-Duplex Transceivers

Hype, Myths, Fundamental Limits and New Directions in Wireless Systems

Fractional Frequency Reuse Schemes and Performance Evaluation for OFDMA Multi-hop Cellular Networks

Performance Evaluation of the VBLAST Algorithm in W-CDMA Systems

Further Vision on TD-SCDMA Evolution

WiMAX/ Wireless WAN Case Study: WiMAX/ W.wan.6. IEEE 802 suite. IEEE802 suite. IEEE 802 suite WiMAX/802.16

Superposition Coding in the Downlink of CDMA Cellular Systems

(R1) each RRU. R3 each

Low-Complexity Beam Allocation for Switched-Beam Based Multiuser Massive MIMO Systems

MIMO Enabled Efficient Mapping of Data in WiMAX Networks

Level 6 Graduate Diploma in Engineering Wireless and mobile communications

Downlink Throughput Enhancement of a Cellular Network Using Two-Hopuser Deployable Indoor Relays

Optimizing Multi-Cell Massive MIMO for Spectral Efficiency

Wireless WAN Case Study: WiMAX/ W.wan.6

K.NARSING RAO(08R31A0425) DEPT OF ELECTRONICS & COMMUNICATION ENGINEERING (NOVH).

THESIS. Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University

MULTI-HOP RADIO ACCESS CELLULAR CONCEPT FOR FOURTH-GENERATION MOBILE COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS

Beamforming algorithm for physical layer security of multi user large scale antenna network

Optimal Power Allocation over Fading Channels with Stringent Delay Constraints

Radio Interface and Radio Access Techniques for LTE-Advanced

Multiple Antenna Processing for WiMAX

UPLINK SPATIAL SCHEDULING WITH ADAPTIVE TRANSMIT BEAMFORMING IN MULTIUSER MIMO SYSTEMS

LTE-Advanced and Release 10

Wireless Communication

flexicon.ee.columbia.edu Harish Krishnaswamy, Gil Zussman, Jin Zhou, Jelena (Marašević) Diakonikolas, Tolga Dinc, Negar Reiskarimian, Tingjun Chen

Performance Evaluation of Uplink Closed Loop Power Control for LTE System

Submission on Proposed Methodology for Engineering Licenses in Managed Spectrum Parks

Degrees of Freedom of the MIMO X Channel

One Cell Reuse OFDM/TDMA using. broadband wireless access systems

Transcription:

Cooperative versus Full-Duplex Communication in Cellular Networks: A Comparison of the Total Degrees of Freedom Amr El-Keyi and Halim Yanikomeroglu

Outline Introduction Full-duplex system Cooperative system Cooperative full-duplex system DoF Comparison and Conclusion

Introduction Cellular Full-duplex Transmission Advantages: Increases throughput and system capacity. Allows more flexible usage of the spectrum. Reduces the delay in the feedback of control information, channel state information and acknowledgment messages. Challenges Self-interference; over 100 db suppression is required. Inter-user interference; careful design of efficient interference management techniques is required.

Introduction Implementation of full-duplex transceivers Shared antenna Same antenna used both for transmission and reception Separate antenna Propagation-domain isolation can be used for self-interference cancellation Shared- and separate -antenna full-duplex transceivers* * A. Sabharwal, P. Schniter, Dongning Guo, D.W. Bliss, S. Rangarajan, and R. Wichman, In-band full-duplex wireless: Challenges and opportunities, IEEE JSAC, vol. 32, pp. 1637 1652, September 2014.

Introduction Related work In [1], single-cell system with full-duplex shared antenna BS and multiple half-duplex UEs, the DoF of the system are doubled. In [2], single-cell system with full-duplex separate antenna BS (M T,M R ) and multiple half-duplex UEs achieves higher DoF than a half-duplex system employing max(m T,M R ) antennas. [1] S.H. Chae and S.H. Lim, Degrees of freedom of cellular networks: Gain from full-duplex operation at a base station, in IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM), Austin, TX, December 2014, pp. 4048 4053. [2] K. Kim, S. Jeon, and D.K. Kim, The feasibility of interference alignment for full-duplex MIMO cellular networks, IEEE Communications Letters, vol. 19, no. 9, pp. 1500 1503, September 2015. For a given number of antennas at each node, what is the DoF gain that can be achieved by full-duplex operation in cellular systems, e.g., a two-cell system?

Full-Duplex System System Model Two-cell system Each BS uses orthogonal resources to communicate with its attached UEs. Each BS has M full-duplex separate antennas. Each UE has N full-duplex separate antennas. Perfect self-interference cancellation at each node. No interference between the BSs Inter-cell and inter-ue interference What is the optimal allocation of transmit/receive antennas at each node?

Full-Duplex System Total Degrees of Freedom The total DoF of a network is defined as log(1 (SNR The DoF represents the rate of growth of network capacity with the logarithm of the signal-to-noise ratio. In most networks, the DoF represents the number of interference-free streams that can be transmitted in the network. The optimal antenna allocation (M T,M R,N T,N R ) is chosen to maximize the total DoF by solving D SNR lim C ) SNR)

Full-Duplex System Equivalent System Model d f : DoF of downlink d r : DoF of uplink D= 2 d f +2 d r Separating the transmit and receive sections of each transceiver: Equivalent system: 4-user partly-connected IC Encoder Decoder

Full-Duplex System Bounding the DoF of the system Eliminating inter-ue inference:

Full-Duplex System Bounding the DoF of the system Eliminating messages from B 2 and U 1 Grouping B 1, B 2, and U 1 transmitters Grouping B 1, B 2, and U 2 receivers

Full-Duplex System Bounding the DoF of the system The total DoF can be bounded by solving A closed-form solution was obtained to the above non-convex problem

Cooperative System System Model Two-cell system Each UE is served by both BSs. Each BS has M antennas. Each UE has N antennas. Uplink and downlink use orthogonal resources D= 2df Results System is equivalent to a 2-user MXN MIMO X-Channel whose DoF is given by

Cooperative Full-Duplex System System Model Two-cell system The two BSs communicate with the two UEs Each BS has M full-duplex separate antennas. Each UE has N full-duplex separate antennas. Perfect self-interference cancellation at each node. No interference between the BSs Inter-cell and inter-ue interference Results Same technique can be used to obtain an upper bound on the DoF of the system

DoF Comparison Full-duplex system Cooperative system Full-duplex cooperative system DoF versus the ratio between the number of antennas at BS and UE

DoF Comparison The achievable DoF of the cooperative system is always greater than or equal to the upper bound on the DoF of the full-duplex system. At M/N=1.5, the cooperative system yields at least 25% gain in DoF compared to the full-duplex system. Adding the full-duplex capability to the cooperative case does not yield significant gain; the maximum DoF gain cannot exceed 12:5% of the DoF of the half-duplex cooperative system DoF versus the ratio between the number of antennas at BS and UE

Future Work Macro cell Full duplex BS employs L full-duplex separate antennas Perfect self-interference cancellation Femto cell Half-duplex (only downlink is operational) M antennas at BS BS transmits with low power All UEs are half-duplex with N antennas each We assume that L M N Fig. System Model What is the optimum antenna allocation at the Macro BS and the DoF?

Future Work Fig. : DoF of the system Fig. : DoF gain over half-duplex macro BS