Technical information Release 07/2010. Cable management systems for improvement of EMC

Similar documents
Power Quality. Case Study. Conrad Bottu Laborelec January 2008

EMC filters. Mounting instructions. Date: January 2006

Overview of the ATLAS Electromagnetic Compatibility Policy

Introduction EMC. Filter parameters. Definition of EMC / EMI. X-Capacitor. Sources of EMI. Coupling mechanism. Y-Capacitor.

Alternative Coupling Method for Immunity Testing of Power Grid Protection Equipment

Heat sink. Insulator. µp Package. Heatsink is shown with parasitic coupling.

150Hz to 1MHz magnetic field coupling to a typical shielded cable above a ground plane configuration

Signal and Noise Measurement Techniques Using Magnetic Field Probes

Electromagnetic and Radio Frequency Interference (EMI/RFI) Considerations For Nuclear Power Plant Upgrades

technical bulletin UTP vs STP Shielded data cables make the grade Unshielded data cables reach the limits of their performance

The Role of the Grounding System in Electronics Lightning Protection

KNX Powerline PL 110. KNX Association

3.7 Grounding Design for EAST Superconducting Tokamak

The Problem of Interference

ECE 528 Understanding Power Quality

Overview of EMC Regulations and Testing. Prof. Tzong-Lin Wu Department of Electrical Engineering National Taiwan University

Copenhagen, May 17 th Light Rail and EMC. Dr.-Ing. Lorenz Jung, Siemens AG, Mobility Division. Siemens AG 2016 All rights reserved.

Understanding and Optimizing Electromagnetic Compatibility in Switchmode Power Supplies

Solution of EMI Problems from Operation of Variable-Frequency Drives

EDBEMV!PZi. Ä!PZiä. Electromagnetic compatibility. Global Drive Basic information on controller applications in plants and machinery

Use optocouplers for safe and reliable electrical systems

10 Mb/s Single Twisted Pair Ethernet Conducted Immunity Steffen Graber Pepperl+Fuchs

An Introduction to EMC Testing (what can be done with scopes) Vincent Lascoste EMC Product Manager - RSF

The Impact Of Signal Jumping Across Multiple Different Reference Planes On Electromagnetic Compatibility

G019.A (4/99) UNDERSTANDING COMMON MODE NOISE

Investigation on the Performance of Different Lightning Protection System Designs

Electromagnetic Compatibility of Power Converters

1 Introduction. 1.1 General installation information

Earthing for EMC in Installations

Reduction of RFI for the Mobile User

A statistical survey of common-mode noise

6. Internal lightning protection

Implement lightning survivability in the design of launch vehicles to avoid lightning induced failures.

Technician License. Course

Power Quality Issues from an EMC Point of View

Modeling of Conduction EMI Noise and Technology for Noise Reduction

Cable Solutions for Servo and Variable Frequency Drives (VFD)

External Drive Hardware

ITU-T K.97. Lightning protection of distributed base stations SERIES K: PROTECTION AGAINST INTERFERENCE. Recommendation ITU-T K.

Vacon Baltic Days Tallinn, Estonia

AP7301 ELECTROMAGNETIC INTERFERENCE AND COMPATIBILITY L T P C COURSE OBJECTIVES:

Field Instrument Cable. Electrical Noise

Lightning Induced Transient Susceptibility A Primer

CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION

) ROTECTION AGAINST,%-0 IN TELECOMMUNICATIONS CENTRES SERIES K: PROTECTION AGAINST INTERFERENCE. ITU-T Recommendation K.40

CHAPTER ELECTROMAGNETIC COMPATIBILITY. Contents of this Chapter...

Analogue circuit design for RF immunity

HAMEG EMI measurement tools

Course Introduction. Content 16 pages. Learning Time 30 minutes

Comparison of IC Conducted Emission Measurement Methods

Source: EMP environnement MIL-STD-464

KwikLink Radiated Immunity Testing

Electromagnetic Compatibility

Determination of EMI of PWM fed Three Phase Induction Motor. Ankur Srivastava

TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS FOR ELECTROMAGNETIC DISTURBANCES EMITTED FROM LIGHTING EQUIPMENT INSTALLED IN TELECOMMUNICATION CENTERS

Telecommunication Wiring Questions

KRF EMC Filters Installation, Operation and Maintenance Manual

EMC in the railway environment Hans Bängtsson

ELECTRICAL FILTERS. (Command Control Communications Computer & Intelligence) E 3 LINE FILTERS EMI LEMP NEMP HEMP TEMPEST

2007 DEHN + SÖHNE / protected by ISO EXFS / 5392

TEST REPORT... 1 CONTENT...

Installation and Operational Instructions for ROBA -switch Type 017._00.2

Improving the immunity of sensitive analogue electronics

ELECTROMAGNETIC COMPATIBILITY HANDBOOK 1. Chapter 8: Cable Modeling

Power Cables and their Application

Chapter 16 PCB Layout and Stackup

Understanding the Unintended Antenna Behavior of a Product

EMC and Variable Speed Drives

7P Series - Surge Protection Device (SPD) Features 7P P P

Combination Wave Test System

Nonlinear Shielded Multipair Railway Cable Modeling with COMSOL Multiphysics

Noise Mitigation for Control Panels

Chapter 9 Power Quality

ELEC3106 Electronics. Lab 3: PCB EMI measurements. Objective. Components. Set-up

EMC Near-field Probes + Wideband Amplifier

Type CP-S, CP-C & CP-A Switch mode

USER MANUAL. DC 13kHz High Voltage Amplifier WMA V to +175V output. Stable with all capacitive loads, generates no overshoot

Internal Model of X2Y Chip Technology

EMC Overview. What is EMC? Why is it Important? Case Studies. Examples of calculations used in EMC. EMC Overview 1

Thyristor power controller B DI1002 V1.0 Manual/Operating instructions

WHY YOU NEED A CURRENT BALUN

Technician License Course Chapter 4. Lesson Plan Module 9 Antenna Fundamentals, Feed Lines & SWR

EMC Data Sheet CSD100 Model size 4 to 6. Variable Speed AC drive for permanent magnet motors

Technical Requirements for Resistibility of Telecommunications Equipment to. Overvoltage and Overcurrent

Installation instructions and notes on implementation of an intermeshed equipotential bonding system with EMClots

3-PHASE EMI/RFI FILTERS

ICEpower125ASX2 Designer s Manual 2x125W or 1x500W ICEpower Amplifier with integrated ICEpower Supply

Technical Report Printed Circuit Board Decoupling Capacitor Performance For Optimum EMC Design

Peak Reducing EMI Solution

One-day Conference 18 March Power Supply, EMC and Signalling, in Railway Systems

Introduction to Electromagnetic Compatibility

Sources of transient electromagnetic disturbance in medium voltage switchgear

Diagnostic testing of cast resin transformers

AC Motor Drives EMC Standard Installation Guide EMC Compliance Practice

A review of shielding performance By Albert R. Martin

QFM21... Duct sensors. Symaro. for relative humidity and temperature

Understanding Noise Cut Transformers

Noise guarding and shielding

Room Sensors. for relative humidity and temperature

By order of American Power Conversion Holdings Inc. at New Taipei City, Taiwan

Transcription:

Technical information Release 07/2010 Cable management systems for improvement of EMC

Definition of electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) In recent years, the use of electronic circuits has increased continually. Whether in industrial systems, medicine, households, in telecommunications systems or electrical building installations everywhere, we see powerful electric equipment and systems, which switch ever greater currents, achieve greater radio ranges and transport ever more energy in smaller spaces. Path of faults Fault source (transmitting emissions) For example - Mobile telephones - Switching components - Ignition systems - Frequency converters - Lighting strike - Welding devices However, the use of state-of-the-art technology means that the complexity of applications also increases. The consequence of this is that ever more opposing influences (electromagnetic interference) can occur from system parts and cables, causing damage and economic losses. Here, we talk of electromagnetic compatibility. Electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) is the ability of an electrical unit to function satisfactorily in its electromagnetic environment, without inappropriately influencing this environment, to which other units also belong (VDE 0870-1). In terms of standardisation, electromagnetic compatibility is dealt with by the EMC directive 2004/108/EC. This means that electrical resources emit electromagnetic interferences (emission), Coupling of interference variables (spreading of interference) - Galvanic - Inductive - Capacitive - Electromagnetic which are picked up by other devices or units (immission) which act as receivers (interference sink). This means that the function of an interference sink can be severely reduced, meaning, in the worst case, total failure and economic losses. The interferences can spread along cables or in the form of electromagnetic waves. Fault sink (receiving emissions) - Process computer - Radio receiver systems - Controllers - Converters - Measuring units 2 OBO

Guarantee of EMC Guarantee of EMC A systematic planning process is necessary to guarantee EMC. The interference sources must be identified and quantified. The coupling describes the spread of the interference from the interference source up to the influenced device, the interference sink. The task of EMC planning is to ensure the compatibility at the source, coupling path and sink using suitable measures. During their daily work, planners and installation engineers are confronted with this subject on an increasingly regular basis. This means that EMC is a basic factor to be taken into consideration during the planning of installations and cabling systems. Due to the high complexity of electromagnetic compatibility, the problems of EMC must be analysed and solved using simplifying hypotheses and models as well as experiments and measurements. Cable support systems and their contribution to EMC Cable support systems can make an important contribution to the improvement of EMC. They are passive and can thus make a safe, long-lasting contribution to EMC through the fact that cables are run within cable support systems or are shielded by them. Routing cables inside cable support systems greatly reduces the galvanic decoupling and coupling due to electrical and magnetic fields in the cables. Thus cable support systems can make a contribution to the reduction of coupling from the source to the sink. The shielding action of cable support systems can be quantified by the coupling resistance and the shield attenuation. This gives the planner important engineering parameters for cable support systems for the EMC engineering. Lightning discharge From the analysis of the effectiveness of EMC in buildings (EN 62305-4), we know that lightning discharge is one of the greatest sources of interference to be expected. This causes a direct current feed into the entire equipotential bonding system in the building and/or to magnetic decoupling of interference currents in electrical cables. With regard to these couplings, cable support systems can offer an effective contribution to the reduction of interference voltages. OBO 3

Magnetic shield insulation of cable support systems The magnetic field (H) of strength 3 ka/m in a defined experimental setup: without cable support system on the left, with cable support system on the right. 1 = Field H, 2 = V 1 LzuPE The magnetic shield insulation of cable support systems is the ratio in decibels (db) of an induced voltage into an unprotected cable to the induced voltage into the same cable, when this is in a cable support system. Experimental structure to determine the magnetic shield insulation of cable support systems: An unshielded cable (NYM-J 5x6 mm²) is subjected to an 8/20 magnetic field with a strength of 3 ka/m. Here, the induced voltage V1 is measured in the unshielded cable. The same cable is Magnetic shield insulation 8/20 db then positioned in the centre of a cable support system (once with a cover, once without) and subjected to the same magnetic field of 3 ka/m. Here, the induced voltage V2 is measured in the unshielded cable. The magnetic shield insulation is calculated from the measured values according to the formula: α S = 20 log (V1/V2) db Experiment result: The magnetic shield effect α S of a cable support system could be clearly proved by the experiments and the simulation with an FEM program. The best result of around 50 db was achieved with cable support systems (cable trays) with covers. Note: The shield insulation against electrical fields is almost perfect, like a Faraday cage. Type, cable tray/cable ladder Without cover With cover RKSM 630 FS 20 50 MKS 630 FS 20 50 MKS 630 FT 20 50 MKSU 630 FS 20 50 MKSU 630 FT 20 50 MKSU 630 VA 20 50 GRM 55/300 FS 15 25 LG 630 NS FT 10 15 4 OBO

Transfer impedance of cable support systems Experimental structure for transfer impedance: 1 = Length l, 2 = U, 3 = I, 4 = Pulse source 8/20 V Interference : Interference voltage measured in cable I Interference : Interference current, fed into the shied from outside (KTS) L : Length of the cable support system Transfer impedance (coupling resistance) of cable support systems The transfer impedance of a cable support system is the ratio of the measured voltage V Interference, measured in the lengthwise direction within the cable support system, to the coupled current I Interference. The transfer impedance is determined in the same way as with the measurement of the electrical conductivity properties in Chapter 11.1. (DIN EN 61537). If there is a lightning strike in a building, partial currents will flow through the entire equipotential Transfer impedance 8/20 mohm/m bonding system. Installed cables are best run within a cable support system. Installed cable support systems are always included in the equipotential bonding system. In so doing, the partial current flows via the cable support system. A very small component can therefore still flow along the cables laid within the cable support system. This component is determined by the transfer impedance of the cable support system. The following applies for the transfer impedance: Z T = V Interference Interference /(I x L) [mω/m] The values given are based on measurements, in which a pulse current of the wave shape 8/20 was passed through a defined length of a cable support system. Experiment result: The effect of the cable support against galvanic coupling was clearly proved by the experiments! The best result was achieved with cable support systems (cable trays) with covers. Type, cable tray/cable ladder Without cover With cover MKS 630 FS 1,14 0,71 MKS 630 FT 1,14 0,71 MKSU 630 FS 0,44 0,09 MKSU 630 FT 0,44 0,09 GRM 55/300 FS 6,17 5,5 OBO 5

6 OBO

ble OBO 7

OBO Bettermann Best.-Nr. 9163160 07/2010 EN