Steady State Operating Curve

Similar documents
Steady State Operating Curve

University of Tennessee at. Chattanooga

Lab Report 4: Root Locus and Proportional Controller

University of Tennessee at Chattanooga. Stead State Operating Curve Report. Engr 3280L/Week 3. William Disterdick. Brown Team

Course: ENGR 329 Section: 001 Date: 02/26/2010 Instructor: Dr. Jim M. Henry

University of Tennessee at Chattanooga. Step Response Modeling. Control Systems Laboratory

Using Root Locus Modeling for Proportional Controller Design for Spray Booth Pressure System

University of Tennessee at Chattanooga. Steady State and Step Response. By: Alex Bedley. Engineering 3280L. Buff. (Alexander Hudson, Ashley Poe)

Steady State Operating Curve Voltage Control System

Proportional-Integral Controller Performance

UTC. Engineering 329. Frequency Response for the Flow System. Gold Team. By: Blake Nida. Partners: Roger Lemond and Stuart Rymer

Aerator Mixer Speed Control System Step Response Modeling

Frequency Response for Flow System

Steady-State and Step Response for the Flow System

Steady-State and Step Response for the Flow System

AERATOR MIXING STATION

Appendix C: Graphing. How do I plot data and uncertainties? Another technique that makes data analysis easier is to record all your data in a table.

AERATOR MIXING STATION

LAB Week 7: Data Acquisition

ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM EET 433 CONTROL SYSTEMS ANALYSIS AND DESIGN LABORATORY EXPERIENCES

Remote Laboratory Operation: Web Technology Successes

General Department PHYSICS LABORATORY APHY 112 EXPERIMENT 2: OHMS LAW. Student s name... Course Semester. Year.Reg.No

Each individual is to report on the design, simulations, construction, and testing according to the reporting guidelines attached.

Tutorial #2: Simulating Transformers in Multisim. In this tutorial, we will discuss how to simulate two common types of transformers in Multisim.

Experiment 9 : Pulse Width Modulation

Performance Characteristics

Ultrasonics. Introduction


( ). (9.3) 9. EXPERIMENT E9: THE RLC CIRCUIT OBJECTIVES

Graphing Techniques. Figure 1. c 2011 Advanced Instructional Systems, Inc. and the University of North Carolina 1

Project Proposal. Low-Cost Motor Speed Controller for Bradley ECE Department Robots L.C.M.S.C. By Ben Lorentzen

Experiment 3. Ohm s Law. Become familiar with the use of a digital voltmeter and a digital ammeter to measure DC voltage and current.

Experiment 2. Ohm s Law. Become familiar with the use of a digital voltmeter and a digital ammeter to measure DC voltage and current.

MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY /6.071 Introduction to Electronics, Signals and Measurement Spring 2006

Ohm s Law and Electrical Circuits

Physics 303 Fall Module 4: The Operational Amplifier

ECE 2006 University of Minnesota Duluth Lab 11. AC Circuits

Instructors. Web Site. Textbook. Grading Policy. Lecture. Lab. Examinations MAE 334 INTRODUCTION TO COMPUTERS AND INSTRUMENTATION

RLC Frequency Response

King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals. Department of Electrical Engineering

Ohm's Law and DC Circuits

Ohm s Law. 1 Object. 2 Apparatus. 3 Theory. To study resistors, Ohm s law, linear behavior, and non-linear behavior.

Introduction to the Op-Amp

The National Curriculum and the Centre for Computing History

Appendix III Graphs in the Introductory Physics Laboratory

Chabot College Physics Lab Ohm s Law & Simple Circuits Scott Hildreth

LABORATORY 7 v2 BOOST CONVERTER

CSE 3215 Embedded Systems Laboratory Lab 5 Digital Control System

Experiment P01: Understanding Motion I Distance and Time (Motion Sensor)

Analysis and Measurement of a Resistor Bridge Circuit with Three Voltage Sources

Experiment 2 Electric Circuit Fundamentals

Chapter 3 THE DIFFERENTIATOR AND INTEGRATOR Name: Date

Physics 1051 Laboratory #4 DC Circuits and Ohm s Law. DC Circuits and Ohm s Law

DC Circuits and Ohm s Law

Using Voltage Dividers to Design a Photo-Sensitive LED Circuit. ( Doug Oliver & Jackie Kane. May be reproduced for non-profit classroom use.

Science Binder and Science Notebook. Discussions

CHAPTER 4 FUZZY BASED DYNAMIC PWM CONTROL

DC Motor Speed Control using PID Controllers

DC Circuits and Ohm s Law

Name Date: Course number: MAKE SURE TA & TI STAMPS EVERY PAGE BEFORE YOU START EXPERIMENT 10. Electronic Circuits

ECE 317 Laboratory #1 Force Sensitive Resistors

Chapter 1: DC circuit basics

DC SERVO MOTOR CONTROL SYSTEM

Optimal Control System Design

SRV02-Series Rotary Experiment # 3. Ball & Beam. Student Handout

Experiment #3: Experimenting with Resistor Circuits

Fuzzy Based Control Using Lab view For Temperature Process

Engineering Fundamentals and Problem Solving, 6e

Mechatronics. Analog and Digital Electronics: Studio Exercises 1 & 2

Experiment 8: Semiconductor Devices

Motomatic Servo Control

EE 330 Experiment 7 Fall Diodes and Diode Applications

Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Lab 2: Characterization of Lab System Components

Experiment G: Introduction to Graphical Representation of Data & the Use of Excel

ET 438B Sequential Digital Control and Data Acquisition Laboratory 4 Analog Measurement and Digital Control Integration Using LabVIEW

Pre-LAB 5 Assignment

Chapter 1: DC circuit basics

Design of PID Control System Assisted using LabVIEW in Biomedical Application

Experiment 8: An AC Circuit

II. Experimental Procedure

Fuzzy Based Control Using Lab view For Temperature Process

OHM S LAW. Ohm s Law The relationship between potential difference (V) across a resistor of resistance (R) and the current (I) passing through it is

Pre-Lab 10. Which plan or plans would work? Explain. Which plan is most efficient in regard to light power with the correct polarization? Explain.

In-Depth Tests of Faulhaber 2657CR012 Motor

Experiment P55: Light Intensity vs. Position (Light Sensor, Motion Sensor)

Operational Amplifier

2.0 AC CIRCUITS 2.1 AC VOLTAGE AND CURRENT CALCULATIONS. ECE 4501 Power Systems Laboratory Manual Rev OBJECTIVE

Figure 1: Unity Feedback System. The transfer function of the PID controller looks like the following:

Simulating Simple Reaction Mechanisms

Physics 4C Chabot College Scott Hildreth

Graph Matching. walk back and forth in front of. Motion Detector

Lab E2: B-field of a Solenoid. In the case that the B-field is uniform and perpendicular to the area, (1) reduces to

Lab 1. Motion in a Straight Line

EK 307 Lab: Light-Emitting Diodes. In-lab Assignment (Complete Level 1 and additionally level 2 if you choose to):

Operational Amplifiers

PHY 132 LAB : Ohm s Law

Physics 131 Lab 1: ONE-DIMENSIONAL MOTION

Uncovering a Hidden RCL Series Circuit

The AD620 Instrumentation Amplifier and the Strain Gauge Building the Electronic Scale

Revision: April 18, E Main Suite D Pullman, WA (509) Voice and Fax

Transcription:

Steady State Operating Curve By Lanze Berry University of Tennessee at Chattanooga Engineering 3280L Blue Team (Khanh Nguyen, Justin Cartwright) Course: ENGR 3280L Section: 001 Date: September 4, 2012 Instructor: Dr. Jim Henry 1

Introduction This laboratory was used to understand a single-input, single-output system and to observe the relationship between the two in a steady state condition. A motor generator is used by a single input to provide constant power and the single output is current that was also generated by the motor generator. The input and output are measured as functions of time by a computer program and further analyzed. The results obtained will be used to observe the steady state performance of the system. The main objective of this laboratory is to develop and interpret a steady state curve of the system and how it will respond to varying power input. The background and theory of the experiment is discussed. Following the background and theory is the procedure of the experiment. The results are then presented and followed by the discussion of the results. The last two sections will include the conclusions and recommendations and the appendices, which will be at the end of the report containing all the raw data. Initially, the Background and Theory section will present the physical and mathematical models used to represent and analyze the data. The Procedure section will then describe how the laboratory was conducted and the method in which it was performed. The Results section will include graphs and tables to explain how the experimental data relates to the initial objective of the laboratory. The Discussion will contain the significance of the results. The Conclusions and Recommendations section will describe the principles that were demonstrated by the results and the discussion. The Appendices will be the last section containing all the remaining data and graphs involved with the results. 2

Background and Theory: This laboratory shows the relationship between a single-input and single-output of a control system in steady state conditions. A steady state operating curve is developed by using the data acquired by sensors and a computer. This operating curve will help show when steady state is reached. Then the average values of the output will be analyzed using statistics to find uncertainties in the measurements. The materials used in this lab are a computer, motor, generator, controller, transmitters and light bulbs. A computer program called LabVIEW is used to graph the readings of the experiment. The computer is used to send a constant input power signal to the motor. The motor will then cause the generator to produce amps. A signal will then be sent back to the computer as an output. Once the signal is received by the computer, LabVIEW will then graph the input and output readings. Once this has been done, the data can be read by EXCEL, which will help in the analysis of the data. Figure 1 shows the schematic of the motor-generated system. Light Bulbs JRC 101 Motor Generator JT 101 Computer ERT 101 Figure 1: Schematic of the Motor- Generated System 3

Figure 1 demonstrates in schematic form the procedure of sending an input and receiving the output. The computer sends a signal to the power transmitter (JT 101) which in turn relays it to the power-recording controller (JRC 101). Once the signal is received, it is sent to the motor where the percentage power is the input. The motor begins to turn and the mechanical energy is converted to electrical energy. The generator uses electromagnetic induction to convert the energy. The new electrical energy is then used to create current to the light bulbs. The generator then sends an amps output signal back to the (ERT) and relays the signal to the computer where it is interpreted in LabVIEW as a graph. The block diagram is shown in Figure 2. Input M(t) Motor Power (%) Motor- Generator System Output C(t) Generated Voltage (V) Generated Amps (A) Figure 2: Block Diagram of the Motor-Generated System Figure 2 shows the input to the system on the left hand side of the block. The input is the time allotted (in seconds) for the experiment and the motor power (in a percentage from 0 to 100). The output response from the system is shown on the right side of the block. The output C(t) demonstrates that it is a function of time. The output also contains the generated amps. The system responds by giving a different amp output to each different input containing the time and motor power percentage used. 4

Procedure The experiment begins with using a computer. A program called LabVIEW is used as system control and it collects data throughout the duration of the experiment. This program was accessible through the internet and the Control Systems class website. Once the Current Information Systems group was selected, a choice appeared to begin collected data for the Constant input function. Once this was selected, a screen appeared with credentials to fill out (name, email, etc ). Also, a space was provided to enter the how many seconds the experiment was to last and there was also a space to enter at what percentage the power should be. Once the criterion was complete, the program would conduct the experiment according to the time and percentage entered. The program then records and plots the data into a data base. The experiment was conducted five times at various percentages to provide an output between three to four amps. The data was then translated into excel to plot a steady state operating curve and to statistically analyze the data. Figure 3 shows the flow of information in LabVIEW. Figure 3: Flow of Information to and from LabVIEW 5

Results The experimental data was collected using LabVIEW. LabVIEW measured the current in amps of the input percentage. Once it was collected, it was compiled into graphs using excel. These graphs represented the power input percentages from 72.5% - 74%. The target output was 3 to 4 amps. Figure 4 is a sample graph that was created using a power input percentage of 72.5%. Figure 4: Time(s) vs. Input(%) vs. Output(Amps) for 72.5% Power Figure 4 shows that the system reached steady state around 39 to 40 seconds. Therefore, any data collected previous to that can be neglected. From 0 seconds to 39 seconds, the data was not included to find the average or the standard deviation. The average came out to be about 3.6 amps and the standard deviation was calculated to be about 0.007 amps. At 72.5% input power, the system took about 39 seconds to reach a consistent level thus reaching steady state. Graphs 6

were created for power input percentages of 72.5% - 74% in 0.5% intervals and can be found in the appendix. The results of the experiments can be represented in Table 1. Table 1 Input Percentage (%) Output (Amps) Uncertainty (Amps) 72.5 3.6 0.006 73 3.7 0.005 73.5 3.8 0.005 74 3.9 0.006 The average amps and standard deviations in Table 1 were used to create a graph. This graph is a representation of the steady state operating curve (SSOC). Figure 5 is the graph of the SSOC for the current system from 72.5% - 74% power inputs at 0.5% intervals. Figure 5: SSOC 7

Figure 5 shows that the system is stable between 72.5% and 74%. The system output current through the steady state operating range is 3.6-3.9 amps. The graph shows a linear line with a constant slope having the equation Amps = 0.2input% - 10.9. This validates the linearity and constant slope. 8

Discussion After obtaining the results, this experiment indicates that at a constant steady state is obtained in the current system with varying input percentages. The steady state operating curves are linear within the 72.5% - 74% range. This is the primary point of interest of this experiment. The maximum standard deviation within the steady state operating curve was 0.06 amps. This shows that the data and the mean of the data had a very close relationship and validates that the output reached a constant or steady state. The steady state operating curve provides confidence to the numbers that were obtained in the experiment. It is proven that the motor in the system can be forced to operate within a desired region of performance. The motor is able to generate the desired current. Since the motor level determines the output amps, it was necessary that the motor could produce 3 to 4 amps and make it steady state. The motor was able to do this for all the tested percentages between 72.5% and 74%. When working with a system, it is important that the system can operate within a steady state region. 9

Conclusions and Recommendations Initially, this experiment was to determine the output in volts using a power input percentage. After some complications, the experiment changed to measuring current. After this change was made, data was collected on a system by a power input percentage that gave an output in amps. The results that were obtained in the experiment clearly showed what was necessary for a steady state operational curve for the system. The experiment validated that a current system with a constant input has an operating range where steady state can be attained. The main objective of the lab was to determine a steady state operating curve for a current system with an input power percentage and an output in amps. To do this, a computer was used to generate the motor and produce a current. The results obtained clearly present the necessity for a system to operate within the steady state region of the curve. 10

Appendix Figure 6: Amps vs. Time for 73% Input Power Figure 7: Amps vs. Time for 73.5% Input Power 11

Figure 8: Amps vs. Time at 74% Input Power References: 1) http://chem.engr.utc.edu/329/ 2) Carlos A. Smith and Armanso Corripio, Principles and Practice of Automatic Process Control., John Wiley & Sons Inc., 3 rd Edition, 2006 (Appendix A) 12