MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING ON BILATERAL CO-OPERATION

Similar documents
IMPLEMENTING AGREEMENT NON-NUCLEAR ENERGY SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNOLOGICAL CO-OPERATION

Chapter 11 Cooperation, Promotion and Enhancement of Trade Relations

CHAPTER TWENTY COOPERATION. The objective of this Chapter is to facilitate the establishment of close cooperation aimed, inter alia, at:

The 45 Adopted Recommendations under the WIPO Development Agenda

WIPO Development Agenda

Committee on Development and Intellectual Property (CDIP)

Facilitating Technology Transfer and Management of IP Assets:

(Acts whose publication is obligatory) of 9 March 2005

CREATIVE ECONOMY PROGRAMME. Development through Creativity

THE WIPO DEVELOPMENT AGENDA. New York February 2011

TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR CONSULTANTS

Rosatom Approach to IPR Management in Collaborative Projects on Innovations

Committee on Development and Intellectual Property (CDIP)

Impact of international cooperation and science and innovation strategies on S&T output: a comparative study of India and China

WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION

The role of IP and other enabling factors for innovation and uptake of climate relevant technologies WIPO Green technology database and services

The Science and Technology Basic Law (Unofficial Translation)

Joint Declaration of Intent. of the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry of Japan, the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications of Japan

UN GA TECHNOLOGY DIALOGUES, APRIL JUNE

CIPO Update. Johanne Bélisle. Commissioner of Patents, Registrar of Trade-marks and Chief Executive Officer

Committee on Development and Intellectual Property (CDIP)

Realizing Developmental Objectives of The IP System: LDC Priority Needs for Technical and Financial Cooperation Lao PDR Experiences

GZ.:BMWF-8.105/5-II/1/2010

CAPACITIES. 7FRDP Specific Programme ECTRI INPUT. 14 June REPORT ECTRI number

THE AMERICAN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW ASSOCIATION RECOMMENDATIONS REGARDING QUALIFICATIONS FOR

Facilitating Technology Transfer and Management of IP Assets: Country Experience

Committee on Development and Intellectual Property (CDIP)

COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 9 December 2008 (16.12) (OR. fr) 16767/08 RECH 410 COMPET 550

IMHA Research. In short it is addressing two questions:

Programme. Social Economy. in Västra Götaland Adopted on 19 June 2012 by the regional board, Region Västra Götaland

CDP-EIF ITAtech Equity Platform

GENEVA COMMITTEE ON DEVELOPMENT AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY (CDIP) Fifth Session Geneva, April 26 to 30, 2010

WIPO Development Agenda

WIPO Intergovernmental Committee on Intellectual Property, Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Folklore, Sixth Session, March 2004

Project Areas : Project Associate

IP KEY SOUTH EAST ASIA ANNUAL WORK PLAN FOR 2018

Australia/Taiwan Electronics and ICT Industry Strategic Framework Agreement (ATSFA) Creating New Industries Together

Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights Frequently Asked Questions

No. prev. doc.: 9108/10 RECH 148 SOC 296 Subject: Social Dimension of the European Research Area - Adoption of Council conclusions

THE INTERNATIONAL COSPAS-SARSAT PROGRAMME AGREEMENT

Patents. What is a patent? What is the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)? What types of patents are available in the United States?

COST FP9 Position Paper

Promoting European clean technologies in India & tackling climate change 1

PCT Related Matters IP Information Roundtable

Subregional Seminar on the Legal Protection of Biotechnology and Genetic Resources Banska Bystrica, May 2 and 3, Access and Benefit Sharing

ACTIVITY REPORT OF THE NATIONAL INDUSTRIAL COMPETITIVENESS COMMISSION PRAMONĖ 4.0 OF 2017

GREECE. Policy environment. General approaches to information technology and infrastructure

Second Annual Forum on Science, Technology and Innovation for the Sustainable Development Goals

The Enterprise Europe Network. in Hungary Zita Majoros, Consultant. Title. Sub-title. 28 th January, Kiev, Ukraine

ONE DAY Awareness Programme on. Intellectual Property Rights for MSME s

Lawrence T. Welch Eli Lilly and Company INDUSTRY COMMENTS

TERMS OF REFERENCE Supporting Implementation of HPNSDP. Technical Assistance for Improving TA Mechanism for the next Health Sector Programme

The Biological Weapons Convention and dual use life science research

( ) Page: 1/5 TECHNICAL COOPERATION ACTIVITIES: INFORMATION FROM OTHER INTERGOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATIONS

General Assembly. United Nations A/63/411. Information and communication technologies for development. I. Introduction. Report of the Second Committee

D.2.2 Concept and methodology for ICT Fora

Article 6 of UNFCCC & The New Delhi Work Programme. An overview. Laurence Pollier, Programme Officer Article 6 Climate Change Secretariat (UNFCCC)

Why the Gulf of Finland Year 2014?

European Union - New Zealand SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY COOPERATION ROADMAP Research and Innovation Priorities

Mutual Learning Programme

Report on the linkage modalities and the rolling workplan of the Technology Executive Committee for

INTERSECTIONALITY AND NEW GOVERNANCE FOR CULTURE AND DEVELOPMENT IN MEXICO CITY PUBLIC REPORT

Stakeholders Conference. Conclusions. EU-EECA S&T cooperation: The way forward. Athens June 2009

Table Of Content. Stichting Health Action International... 2 Summary... 3 Coordinator, Leader contact and partners... 6 Outputs...

I. Introduction. Cover note. A. Mandate. B. Scope of the note. Technology Executive Committee. Fifteenth meeting. Bonn, Germany, September 2017

Implementation of IP Policy Methodological Issues: Establishing Action Plans with Specific Indicators

RENEW-ESSENCE Position Paper on FP9 September Michele Guerrini, Luca Moretti, Pier Francesco Moretti, Angelo Volpi

Standing Committee on the Law of Patents

TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER: SUCCESSFUL PHILIPPINE EXPERIENCE

COLLABORATIVE R&D & IP ISSUES IN TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER IN UNIVERSITY SYSTEM

Rules of Usage for the BESSY II Electron Storage Ring and the BER II Neutron Source at the Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin für Materialien and Energie GmbH

The Seventh China-EU Summit Held in The Hague, the Netherlands

25 July 2017 Without prejudice [PROVISIONS IN RELATION TO TRADE IN GOODS ALREADY INCLUDED IN THE EU TEXT PROPOSAL FOR THE TRADE IN GOODS CHAPTER]

CPC Essentials I Part A Introduction to CPC Essentials and Patent Classification Systems

The main recommendations for the Common Strategic Framework (CSF) reflect the position paper of the Austrian Council

Societal engagement in Horizon 2020

1. Recognizing that some of the barriers that impede the diffusion of green technologies include:

XXVII MINISTERIAL CONFERENCE - COMMUNIQUE MADRID, 30 JUNE 2017

1 Enhancement of Intellectual Property-Related Activities at Universities and Public Research Institutes

Lithuania: Pramonė 4.0

Committee on Development and Intellectual Property (CDIP)

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING On Cooperation Among APEC Financial Institutions Dealing with SMEs

Pending issues arising from the work of the second Meeting of the Conference of the Parties

UNITED NATIONS OFFICE OF LEGAL AFFAIRS

EuropeAid. Sustainable and Cleaner Production in the Manufacturing Industries of Pakistan (SCI-Pak)

REGIONAL WORKSHOP THE DEVELOPMENT OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS (IPR) AND THE VALORISATION OF INTANGIBLE ASSETS IN THE MEDITERRANEAN

Meeting of International Authorities under the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) : QUALITY SUBGROUP 8 th Informal Session

Translation University of Tokyo Intellectual Property Policy

Committee on Development and Intellectual Property (CDIP)

Innovative performance. Growth in useable knowledge. Innovative input. Market and firm characteristics. Growth measures. Productivitymeasures

Patent Cooperation Treaty Pct

Period of Report: March, Country: INDIA

Country Profile: Israel

INTERGOVERNMENTAL COMMITTEE FOR THE PROTECTION AND PROMOTION OF THE DIVERSITY OF CULTURAL EXPRESSIONS

Roadmap of Cooperative Activities

MEASURES TO INCREASE THE EFFICIENCY OF CIF COMMITTEES. CTF-SCF/TFC.11/7/Rev.1 January 27, 2014

Essential requirements for a spectrum monitoring system for developing countries

The New Delhi Communiqué

Digitization and Dissemination of Intellectual Property (IP) Information and Utilization of Effective Search Tools

Conducted by Centre for Intellectual Property Rights (CIPR), Anna University, Chennai

Transcription:

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING ON BILATERAL CO-OPERATION between The Office of the Controller General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks, Department of Industrial Policy and Promotion, Ministry of Commerce and Industry of the Republic of India and The United States Patent and Trademark Office, U.S. Department of Commerce The Office of the Controller General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks, Department of Industrial Policy and Promotion (DIPP), Ministry of Commerce and Industry of the Republic of India, on the one hand, and the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), U.S. Department of Commerce, on the other hand, Hereinafter called the Parties, Considering: - The Joint Statement made by the Governments of India and the United States of America on the 2 nd of March, 2006, on the occasion of the visit of the President of the United States of America to India, to work together to promote innovation, creativity and technological advancement by providing a vibrant intellectual property rights regime, and to cooperate in the field of intellectual property rights in capacity building activities, human resource development and public awareness programmes; and

- The benefits of closer cooperation in fostering the protection and promotion of intellectual property rights; Have arrived at the following understanding: Article 1 Objective The objective of this Memorandum of Understanding is to further co-operation between the Parties in the field of Intellectual Property Rights, in accordance with the responsibilities of the two institutions in this area. Article 2 Areas of Cooperation The Parties agree to co-operate in the strengthening of the Intellectual Property Offices, both in India and in United States, for the benefit of their respective industry and citizens. To this end the Parties agree to develop a relationship on the basis of mutual trust, respect and common values, in the areas of capacity building, human resource development and public awareness programmes in Intellectual Property (IP). Article 3 Capacity Building The Parties shall work together in capacity building in Intellectual Property Rights including automation and modernisation of Intellectual 2

Property Offices, development of databases, and procedural rationalization and simplification of processing of Intellectual Property applications, inter alia, through the exchange of information on patent data, best practices in patent examination procedures, etc. Article 4 Human Resource Development The two Parties shall cooperate in the training of personnel and human resource development in the area of Intellectual Property Rights with a view to strengthening the working of the Intellectual Property (IP) systems in the two countries, including in patent examination training. Article 5 Public Awareness Programmes The two Parties shall work together in the organisation of public awareness and sensitisation programmes in the area of Intellectual Property Rights. This could include the joint organisation of seminars, symposia, and workshops for stakeholders, including, inventors, scientists, professionals, Intellectual Property managers, etc. as well as for the general public with the objective of creating an Intellectual Property sensitive society. Small and Medium-sized Enterprises (SMEs) will be given special focus in the sensitisation programmes. 3

Article 6 Annual Action Plan The Parties would jointly draw up and agree on an Annual Action Plan that will set out the specific co-operation activities to be carried out each year. The Annual Action Plan, inter alia, would include, a. Exchange of experiences between U.S. and India in training of Intellectual Property Office functionaries, IP managers, IP professionals and IP policy makers. b. Development of appropriate modules and curricula for such training. c. Development of continued institutional cooperation for regular academic exchanges between IP institutes in the two countries. d. Exchange of information and best practices in the automation of IP offices, developing IP databases and examination procedures of patents, trademarks, designs, geographical indications, etc. e. Exchange of best practices in spreading awareness about IP among students, industrialists and the civil society. f. Exchange of information about institutional mechanisms for addressing potential concerns between right holders and consumers. g. Joint activities on specific IP issues. h. Exchange of experience in the area of protection of Traditional Knowledge. Each Annual Action Plan will include the detailed planning for carrying out of the co-operation activities including the scope of the action, administration and assignment of resources, total costs and their distribution, time schedule and any other information deemed necessary. 4

Each Annual Action Plan need not necessarily include co-operation activities in all the fields specified in this Memorandum of Understanding. Article 7 Monitoring Mechanism A Joint Consultative Mechanism (JCM) will be established for drawing up the Annual Action Plans, for overseeing their implementation and for facilitating the exchange of views on any point of interest for the two Parties. The JCM will meet at least once a year to approve the Annual Action Plan, and monitor and evaluate the co-operation activities carried out. It shall meet also at the formal written request of either of the Parties, subject to the agreement of the other party. Article 8 Funding The implementation of each activity shall be subject to the availability of the required funds in the annual budgets of the respective Parties. Article 9 Entry into Force This Memorandum of Understanding will enter into force on the day following the date of its signature. 5

Article 10 Termination This Memorandum of Understanding is concluded for duration of two years, with the aim of being renewed, subject to the Parties mutual agreement. Either Party may terminate this Memorandum of Understanding at any time by means of at least 90 calendar days' written notice to the other Party. The early termination of this Memorandum of Understanding will not affect the completion of any co-operation measures that were agreed under the annual work programmes whilst it was in force. Signed in New Delhi on 6 December 2006 in two originals in the English language. For the Office of the Controller General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks, Department of Industrial Policy & Promotion For the United States Patent and Trademark Office, U.S. Department of Commerce Dr. Ajay Dua Secretary Department of Industrial Policy & Promotion Ministry of Commerce & Industry Government of India Jon W. Dudas Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office 6