IP and Technology Management for Universities

Similar documents
University IP and Technology Management. University IP and Technology Management

Partnerships and Collaboration

Support for Universities and R&D institutions

University Technology Transfer, Innovation Ecosystem and EIE Project

Technology Transfer and the University: an orientation for new faculty at Johns Hopkins University

Discovery: From Concept to the Patient - The Business of Medical Discovery. Todd Sherer, Ph.D.

Facilitating Technology Transfer and Management of IP Assets:

Intellectual Property

Loyola University Maryland Provisional Policies and Procedures for Intellectual Property, Copyrights, and Patents

Bayh-Dole Act The Portuguese Reality: Challenges and Opportunities

IP Commercialization Trends Income or Impact. Trieste, September 29 and 30, 2016

TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER: Challenges, Opportunities and Successful Cases. Phan Quoc Nguyen

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY POLICY

Where to File Patent Application Yumiko Hamano IP Consultant - IP Commercialization Partner, ET Cube International

IP Teaching in Science and Engineering Faculties

CDP-EIF ITAtech Equity Platform

Technology Transfer and Intellectual Property Principles in the Conduct of Biomedical Research

Role of Intellectual Property in Science, Technology and Development

Northwestern Intellectual Property Policies. OSR-Evanston Quarterly Network Monday, April 13 th Ben Frey, J.D., Senior Contracts Manager

Data Sciences Entrepreneurship class

COLLABORATIVE R&D & IP ISSUES IN TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER IN UNIVERSITY SYSTEM

A POLICY in REGARDS to INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY. OCTOBER UNIVERSITY for MODERN SCIENCES and ARTS (MSA)

University-industry collaborations in Japan. TODAI TLO, Ltd.

The Intellectual Property, Knowledge Transfer: Perspectives

Opportunities and Challenges for Open Innovation

Getting Started. This Lecture

WIPO Development Agenda

UNCITRAL Third International Colloquium on Secured Transactions Session on Contractual Guide on IP Licensing (Vienna, March 3, 2010)

Technology Transfer & Inventing in Academia

Patenting, Innovation & Technology Transfer : The CSIR Experience

TECHNOLOGY INNOVATION LEGISLATION HIGHLIGHTS

Technology Transfer: Working with Industry at MIT. 10 February 2009 Kenneth A. Goldman Manager, Corporate Relations MIT Industrial Liaison Program

MORGAN STATE UNIVERSITY PROCEDURES ON PATENTS AND TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER APPROVED BY THE PRESIDENT NOVEMBER 2, 2015

POLICY ON INVENTIONS AND SOFTWARE

REGIONAL WORKSHOP THE DEVELOPMENT OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS (IPR) AND THE VALORISATION OF INTANGIBLE ASSETS IN THE MEDITERRANEAN

Technology Transfer. Research Universities as Engines for Economic Development

Translation University of Tokyo Intellectual Property Policy

Towards a New IP Consciousness in Universities and R&D Institutions: Case Show

establishing relationships with firms and community actors; generating new funding support from sponsored research or consulting opportunities;

Technology Transfer and Intellectual Property Best Practices

DOC-CAREERS II Project, Final conference Brussels 2012 University-Industry Intellectual property rights: Balancing interests

WIPO-WASME Program on Practical Intellectual Property Rights Issues for Entrepreneurs, Economists, Bankers, Lawyers and Accountants

Overview. How is technology transferred? What is technology transfer? What is Missouri S&T technology transfer?

OECD s Innovation Strategy: Key Findings and Policy Messages

UHS Intellectual Property Policies and Procedures

The 45 Adopted Recommendations under the WIPO Development Agenda

WIPO NATIONAL SEMINAR ON THE INNOVATION PROMOTION, TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER AND SUCCESSFUL TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER (STL)

COMMERCIALISATION PUBLIC RESEARCH RESULTS

Managing Intellectual Property: from invention disclosure to commercialisation

Intellectual Property Ownership and Disposition Policy

TECHNOLOGY COMMERCIALIZATION AND INNOVATION STRATEGY

Licensing, Transfer of Ownership and Dispute Resolution - Commercialization of Intellectual Property Generated in International R&D Projects

Prof. Steven S. Saliterman. Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Minnesota

Inside or Outside the IP System? Business Creation in Academia. Scott Shane (CWRU)

Managing the University IP Office

WPI Intellectual Property A day in the life of the tech transfer office. Todd Keiller Director, Intellectual Property and Innovation

ECU Research Commercialisation

Technology Commercialization Primer: Understanding the Basics. Leza Besemann

CRS Report for Congress

UNIVERSITI BRUNEI DARUSSALAM INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY POLICY

Governing Council. Inventions Policy. October 30, 2013

Building a Competitive Edge: Protecting Inventions by Patents and Utility Models

Public Research and Intellectual Property Rights

TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER AT THE UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE: INVENTIONS AND COMMERCIALIZATION

Innovating together Collaborations between multi-national companies and academia in China

World Trade Organization Regional Workshop, Hong Kong, November 11 to 13, 2014

Berkeley Postdoc Entrepreneur Program (BPEP)

UW REGULATION Patents and Copyrights

The Role of Effective Intellectual Property Management in Enhancing the Competitiveness of Small and Medium-sized Enterprises (SMEs)

POLICY PHILOSOPHY DEFINITIONS AC.2.11 INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY. Programs and Curriculum. APPROVED: Chair, on Behalf of SAIT s Board of Governors

Collaborating with the Office of Technology Transfer

Facilitating Technology Transfer and Management of IP Assets: Country Experience

Research Valorization Process.

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OVERVIEW. Patrícia Lima

WIPO REGIONAL SEMINAR ON SUPPORT SERVICES FOR INVENTORS, VALUATION AND COMMERCIALIZATION OF INVENTIONS AND RESEARCH RESULTS

McLEAN SIBANDA. Senior Patent Attorney Innovation Fund WIPO LIFESCIENCES SYMPOSIUM: PUBLIC SECTOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT (R&D) INSTITUTIONS

F98-3 Intellectual/Creative Property

Co-funded by the I Erasmus+ Programme of the European Union

Policy Contents. Policy Information. Purpose and Summary. Scope. Published on Policies and Procedures (

Intellectual Property Initiatives

The research commercialisation office of the University of Oxford, previously called Isis Innovation, has been renamed Oxford University Innovation

NEW CHALLENGES AND INITIATIVES ON IP POLICIES FOR PROMOTING INNOVATION

Academic Technology Licensing & the America Invents Act

INNOVATION PROMOTION, TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER AND SUCCESSFUL TECHNOLOGY LICENSING (STL) REGIONAL TRAINING PROGRAM

Identifying and Managing Joint Inventions

The role of Intellectual Property (IP) in R&D-based companies: Setting the context of the relative importance and Management of IP

EL PASO COMMUNITY COLLEGE PROCEDURE

Knowledge transfer and IP management at universities and public research organisations in Serbia

Canada s Intellectual Property (IP) Strategy submission from Polytechnics Canada

Technology Transfer in Germany - Status Quo and Recent Trends

Building an enterprise-centred innovation system

Intellectual Property Management - How to capture, protect and exploit your ideas

ROLE UNIVERSITIES PLAY IN INNOVATION AND ENTREPREURSHIP

An Introduction to China s Science and Technology Policy

The basics of successful IP-Management in Horizon 2020

Untying the Gordian Knot:

GZ.:BMWF-8.105/5-II/1/2010

UNIVERSITIES AND TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER PATENT ATTORNEYS TRADE MARK ATTORNEYS

Gonzalo LEÓN. Catedrático de la Universidad Politécnica de Madrid

Transcription:

IP and Technology Management for Universities Yumiko Hamano Senior Program Officer WIPO University Initiative Innovation and Technology Transfer Section, Patent Division, WIPO

Outline! University and IP! IP Policy! IP and Technology Management

Industry Strategies R&D Budget Increase R&D Staff Increase Joint R&D with JP Univ. Joint R&D with Overseas Univ. Joint Venture Others 0% 50% 100% Source: Nikkei 2005

Growing Technology Transfer Activities from University Example: US in 2009 $53.9 billion R&D expenditures 20,309 invention disclosures 5,328 total licenses and options executed, 4,374 of which were licenses 13,600 current valid licenses from Universities to Companies 658 new products introduced into the market 3,417 patents from univ. issued 596 new start-ups (435 of which have business in the licensing institution s home state 3,423 startup companies still operating as of the end of FY2009 Source: AUTM U.S. Licensing Activity Survey Summary: FY2009

Change in Legal Framework US - Bayh Dole Act (1980) The Bayh-Dole Act allows the transfer of exclusive control over inventions generated from government funded researches to universities Abolition of the Professor s privilege Germany: 2001 Reform of Employee Law Austria: 2002 Denmark: 2002 Act on Inventions at Public Research Institutions University Law Japan: 1995 Basic Law of Science and Technology 1998 Law promoting tech. transfer from universities 1999 Japanese version of Bayh Dole Act 2000 Law facilitating univ.-industry collaboration 2004 Change in legal status of public universities (semi-autonomous institutions)

Globalization! Internetè Easy access to information! Global market! More competition! Need to improve efficiency! Need to improve quality! Fast technology cycle! Technology interdependency è Need to collaborate! Intangible assets! Knowledge based economy

Roles of University In the past Today, additional roles of university include. Education Generate new knowledge through research Transfer the knowledge generated to the public for the benefit of society Source: Yumiko Hamano, Roles of University Research funds management Drafting research contracts and agreements Evaluation of technology Protection of research results Due diligence Technology marketing Licensing negotiation Increased collaboration with industry Entrepreneurship development Incubation of spin-offs/start-ups IP training for researchers Administration of institutional IP policy Monitoring deals etc. IP & Tech. Management

University and IP rights Universities should identify, protect, manage, utilize and profit from IP rights in the fields of : Patents Copyrights Computer programs New biological materials Trade secrets Designs Trademarks

Stakeholders University and RI The managers of University and RI Professors and researchers Research assistants, post graduate students and visiting researchers Research collaborators and private sponsors TTO within the university Commercialization partners - Industry The national or state Government The public

IP and Technology Management Technology Management Legal aspects Business

IP Management in Universities Technology Management Research strategy Research planning Research contracts Patent Information Search Technology evaluation (marketability/ Patentability) Invention disclosures Technology transfer process 2009 Yumiko Hamano

IP Management in Universities IP and legal aspects IP information dissemination IP training IP awareness/ capacity building IP guidelines/ policies Research contracts Record keeping and management Patent application procedures contracts and agreements Licensing agreement/ negotiation Management of active patents/ licenses 2009 Yumiko Hamano

IP Management in Universities Business! Research funds management! University-Industry collaboration! Patent application decision! Marketing! Evaluation of commercialization potential! Technology valuation! Licensing negotiation! Incubation (Start up/ Spin-off company)! Research investment 2009 Yumiko Hamano

University-Industry Collaboration Infrastructure Universities and R&D institutions IP Policy IP Committee TTO Government Economic Development (SME Policies, market creation National IP Infrastructure (laws and Regulations) Enforcement IP Strategy R&D Enhancement IP Education Research Funds IP Assets Industry Research Funds Research Collaborations Licensing Marketing Production and Commercialization

IP Management in Universities 1. Infrastructure l Establishment of an TTO l IP Policies l R&D planning/strategy l Research funding 2. Capacity Building l IP training 3. Protection of IPR l l l l l l Identification of IP Invention disclosure Patent application procedures Patent Information search Legal matters Administration of legal issues 4. Exploitation of IPR l l l l IP/ tech. Marketing Licensing negotiation and monitoring deals Commercialization Incubation of start-up/ spin-off

Institutional IP Policy IP Policy: Principles of actions adopted by an organization or an individual often legal implication

Importance of IP Policy IP Policy provides: Clear rules and guidelines for research operations The legal framework for commercialization Guidance for IP and technology management procedures Clear policy on ownership criteria and benefit sharing Consistency of approach (in a systematic manner) e.g. invention disclosure, decision on patent filing, distribution of benefit etc.) Transparency in decision making process Objectivity in measurement Researchers with incentive Balance between conflicting interest of various stakeholders and fosters: Transfer of technology generated in the university Innovation and creativity in the university (Local) economic growth

Who the IP Policy Applied to? All university staff (i.e. the management professors, researchers, students and IP management units) Governments Partner Industries Partner universities Public

IP and Technology Mgt. Key Issues! Ownership! Benefit Sharing! Collaboration with Industry! Contracts an Agreements! Government Rights! Invention Disclosure Process! Roles of Technology Transfer Office! Commercialization Process! Patent filing! Costs (prototype, patent filing, attorney s fee etc.)! Conflict and interest! Incentive

Invention Disclosure Invention Disclosure Form! Name of person completing and submitting this form:! Work phone number:! Fax number:! TITLE OF THE INVENTION:! CONCEPTION OF INVENTION! Date and place of conception! TECHNOLOGY DESCRIPTION! Prior Art! INVENTOR(S) INVENTOR : Name: Residence Address: Citizenship: Telephone Number: Email address Signature

Ownership Who owns IP generated by publicly funded research? Generally national law defines who owns IP (inventions) arising from work conducted for an employer In some cases, national laws specifically address ownership of inventions arising from publicly sponsored research Sometimes IP ownership covered in different laws

Ownership Government University (e.g., Germany, Austria, Japan, China, South Korea, UK, France, US, Denmark) Creator/ Faculty (e.g., Sweden, Italy)

Benefit Sharing How are the revenues from research commercialization shared among faculty, university, government funder and other stakeholders? The distribution proportions differ by institution Inventor Faculty University On average, Inventor: 25-85% Faculty: 25-30% University: 25-50% (in many cases, the university provides part of its portion to the TTO (or the administrative unit) and the laboratories of the creator 1/3: 1/3: 1/3 institution portion often used for funding research )

Incentive Scheme How should universities and R&D institutions encourage and motivate scientists/ researchers? Training on IP knowledge Capacity building Involvement of scientists/ researchers in the process of IP and technology management Financial compensation Fixed percentage of royalties lump sum Inventor s award Personal program Promotion scheme Framed certificate of inventors Dinner with dean/ the senior management of university thanking inventor/ research team

Conflict of Interest How are conflicts of interest and commitment handled? Mandate of universities vs. those of industries Social Concern Institutional Concern Individual concern

University-Industry Collaboration <Opinion of Industry > Ø Ø Ø Ø Ø Ø Ø Ø Ø Ø University general attitude is poor do not view industry as a Customer Arrogance, do not like working with small firms Complexity of deal & weird expectations Too cumbersome In some cases licensing fees for university technology are too high Universities rarely license-in research from any source University research is generally at a too early stage of development Univ. rarely engage in research in our line of business Univ. policies regarding delay of publication are too strict University often refuses to transfer ownership to our company Ø We are concerned about obtaining faculty cooperation for further development of technology Source: Jerry G. Thursby & Marie C. Thursby / Dato Mohamed Shariff

Addressing Conflicting Values and Common Interest Knowledge for Knowledge s Sake Academic Freedom Open Discourse UNIVERSITY Teaching Research Service Development Commercialization of New and Useful Technologies INDUSTRY Profits R&D Management of Knowledge for Profit Confidentiality Limited Public Disclosure Source: Louis P. Berneman, 1999

Major Challenges to commercialize R&D results! Lack of IP management infrastructure! Lack of strategic research planning! Gap between basic research and market needs! Lack of funds for IP protection! Lack of IP knowledge! Lack of expertise to manage TT and commercialization process! Lack of entrepreneurial culture among researchers! Lack of business skills! Lack of marketing skills! Lack of support (Government, Senior managers) and incentive! Culture gap (University vs. Industry)

Necessary Ingredients for effective Technology Transfer Adequate IP protection and enforcement legal framework Funds Marketable Technologies HR with Right Expertise Infrastructure Networking/ Collaboration Source: Yumiko Hamano

Image source: Google

Useful links http://www.wipo.int/patentscope/en/ http://ep.espacenet.com/ http://www.piug.org/vendors.php http://www.wipo.int/classifications/ipc

WIPO web site: www.wipo.int WIPO University Initiative web site: www.wipo.int/uipc/en yumiko.hamano@wipo.int

Thank you for your attention.