Sector dynamics and firms demographics of top EU R&D investors in the global economy

Similar documents
EU Industrial R&D Scoreboard 2015

Sector dynamics and demographics of top R&D firms in the global economy

The 2011 EU industrial R&D investment SCOREBOARD

Monitoring industrial research: The 2009 EU Survey on R&D Investment Business Trends

The EU industrial R&D investment SCOREBOARD

Background material 1

The JRC-IPTS and DG RTD-C would like to express their thanks to everyone who has contributed to this project.

EU R&D SURVEY. The 2016 EU Survey on Industrial R&D Investment Trends EUR EN

EU corporate R&D intensity gap: What has changed over the last decade?

The 2010 EU industrial R&D investment SCOREBOARD

ICT Research and Innovation Trends in EEMS

EU R&D SURVEY. The 2014 EU Survey on Industrial R&D Investment Trends. Report EUR EN

STI 2018 Conference Proceedings

Overview of the potential implications of Brexit for EU27 Industry and Space Policy

Mapping private R&D outputs: The contribution of top R&D companies to scientific literature 1

The 2016 EU Industrial R&D Scoreboard 1

RTA of EU regions and top R&D investors

Industrial Investment in Research and Development: Trends and Prospects

Towards a digital grid: Insights to prepare for the future October 2013

Characterising the Dynamics of Nano S&T: Implications for Future Policy

Chapter 2: Effect of the economic crisis on R&D investment 60

Projection of R&D Intensive Enterprises' Growth to the year 2020: Implications for EU policy? Peter Voigt and Pietro Moncada-Paternó-Castello

Trends at the frontier in Corporate R&D in the digital era

Role of public research institutes in Japan s National Innovation System: The case of AIST, RIKEN, JAXA

The structural transformations of internationalized R&D activities: An analysis of patents data

The production function of top R&D investors: Accounting for size and sector heterogeneity with quantile estimations

PREDICT Policy Workshop 2014 Jointly organised by JRC-IPTS and IVIE. What policy messages from ICT R&D evidence?

2011 Angel Group Year in Review

Licensing or Not Licensing?:

E-COMMERCE AS A TOOL FOR DEVELOPMENT : ANALYTICAL AND REGIONAL PERSPECTIVE ARUN JACOB

Proceedings of CONCORD 2010:

RIO Country Report 2015: India

Information Technology and the Japanese Growth Recovery

IPTS WORKING PAPER on CORPORATE R&D AND INNOVATION - No. 03/2011 Companies growth in the EU: What is research and innovation policy s role?

The European Semiconductor industry: 2005 Competitiveness Report. DG Enterprise

A TAXONOMY OF DIGITAL INTENSIVE SECTORS

Information Technology and the Japanese Growth Recovery

RIO Country Report 2015: France

China: Technology Leader or Technology Gap?

SEMICONDUCTOR INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION FACTBOOK

Industry Outlook September 2015

R&D in Low Tech Sectors

Corporate Invention Board

From FP7 towards Horizon 2020 Workshop on " Research performance measurement and the impact of innovation in Europe" IPERF, Luxembourg, 31/10/2013

Innovation. performance in. Denmark. Country Profile. Research and Innovation

Understanding Social Computing: Challenges and Opportunities for Europe

Industrial Robots for Machinery Industry: Global Market

Research DG. European Commission. Sharing Visions. Towards a European Area for Foresight

Big data for the analysis of digital economy & society Beyond bibliometrics

Promoting Foreign Direct Investment in The United States. Christopher Clement International Investment Specialist Invest in America

THE EVOLUTION OF THE INTERNATIONAL SPATIAL ARCHITECTURE OF CLUSTERING AND VALUE NETWORKS

A framework for assessing innovation collaboration partners and its application to BRICs

Mind the (AI) Gap: Leadership Makes the Difference 04 DECEMBER 2018

R&D and innovation activities in companies across Global Value Chains

Monitoring industrial research: the 2005 EU industrial R&D investment SCOREBOARD

Green policies, clean technology spillovers and growth Antoine Dechezleprêtre London School of Economics

Science, research and innovation performance of the EU 2018

Patent data analysis to support policy making Assessing S&T cooperation partners: the case of India & China

NATIONAL SURVEY of Research and Development in Singapore

MSMES: OPPORTUNITIES AND CHALLENGES FOR THE SDG AGENDA

Joint Research Centre. The European Commission s in-house science service

Data have been collected by Bureau van Dijk Electronic Publishing GmbH under supervision by Petra Steiner, Annelies Lenaerts and Vivien Schulz.

The 2008 R&D Scoreboard. The top 850 UK and 1400 global companies by R&D investment. Commentary & Analysis

Joint Research Centre

The Transformational Dynamics of the US-Japan Economic Relationship

Executive Summary World Robotics 2018 Industrial Robots

The Strategy of Promoting Born - Global and High- Growth SMEs

European companies outpace American counterparts in R&D investment growth for the first time in five years

Greater Binghamton, New York

Angel Group Update: Q2 2013

48 RobecoSAM The Sustainability Yearbook RobecoSAM Industry Leaders 2016

Role of Science, Technology and innovation policy in stimulating economic growth and competitiveness

RACE2050 Or A Past Rich with Future (for the European Transport Industry)

OECD s Innovation Strategy: Key Findings and Policy Messages

The capability of the EU R&D Scoreboard companies to develop Advanced Manufacturing Technologies

Linking Technology Areas to Industrial Sectors

Systems and modes of ICT innovation René Wintjes

China s Patent Quality in International Comparison

Innovation. performance in. Slovenia. Country Profile. Research and Innovation

Acknowledgements. Legal Notice

CZECH ECONOMY. In 2016 and 1H2017. Section of Industry Economic Analyses Department. Czech Economy

CCR Phase II Study Measure for Measure: Chemical R&D Powers the U.S. Innovation Engine. Donald B. Anthony, Sc.D. President & Executive Director

EU R&D SCOREBOARD. The 2017 EU Industrial R&D Investment Scoreboard EUR EN

Workshop on. The dynamics of EU industrial structure and the growth of innovative firms SUMMARY

International Protection of ICT Intellectual Property and the Internationalization of ICT R&D

PÖYRY INSIGHT. World Paper Markets up to 2030

The Intellectual Property, Knowledge Transfer: Perspectives

R&D of Multinationals in China: Structure, Motivations and Regional Difference

Executive Summary 11. Estimated worldwide annual shipments of industrial robots

RIO Country Report 2015: Lithuania

Culture for a new creative generation. Creativity in schools in Europe A survey of teachers

The Evolution of Science and Technology: The Need for a New Policy Model. Jerald Hage, Director Center for Innovation,

ECONOMIC SNAPSHOT. A Summary of the San Diego Regional Economy UNEMPLOYMENT

D8.2 Overall impact of the Innovation Union progress as measured in the IU scoreboard

CANADA-JAPAN RELATIONS Building an even stronger partnership. Miklos Dietz March 21, 2016

Science, Technology & Innovation Indicators

ICT Research and Innovation Trends in EEMS (as seen in the Reports on ICT R&D in the EU)

Enabling investment: general factors

Venture Capital Search Highlights

COUNTRY SPECIALISATION REPORT

Transcription:

Sector dynamics and firms demographics of top EU R&D investors in the global economy Pietro MONCADA-PATERNÒ-CASTELLO European Commission, Joint Research Centre Institute for Prospective Technological Studies Knowledge for Growth Unit Sixth Industrial Research and Innovation Monitoring and Analysis (IRIMA) workshop: R&D Investment and Firm Dynamics" European Commission DGRTD and JRC Brussels, University Club Foundation - 3 December 2015

WHY THIS WORK? Motivations: Analyse the dynamics of corporate R&D investment in the main world economies (2005-2013) Investigate the relation between sectoral dynamics and firms' age Identify possible implication for policies. Aim: To understand better the reasons for EU corporate R&D intensity gap considering firms' demographics and sector dynamics To contribute to the literature of innovation, industrial dynamics and firms' heterogeneity 2

RESEARCH QUESTIONS 1. How do countries perform in corporate R&D? 2. Are there country specificities in the change of R&D investment across sectors? 3. How (if) does sector composition determine firms' age? 4. How does EU firms' demographics compare with respect to US in key R&D intensive sectors?

DATASET Sources: EU Industrial R&D Investment Scoreboard: economic & financial micro-data of top world R&D investors. Data from 9 R&D Scoreboard editions: 2006 to 2014; top 1,000 R&D firms in each edition Limitations: low representativeness of companies in Asian Tigers and China in the earliest EU R&D Scoreboards METHODOLOGICAL APPROACH Manhattan distance metrics (in "sectors shift" computation); OLS linear regression model with sector and country dummies (for the effects of sectors to firms' age); Descriptive statistical analysis (in the rest of analyses) 4

Main results (1) Shares of R&D investment (left) and firms (right)

Main results (2.1) Average shift across sectors, 2005-2013 R&D investment (left), number of companies (right) 0.30 0.30 0.25 0.25 0.20 0.20 0.15 0.15 0.10 0.10 0.05 0.05 0.00 USA EU Japan Asian Tigers Rest of the World China 0.00 USA EU Japan Asian Tigers Rest of the World China Note: Based on the top 1000 R&D investors worldwide for each of the years 6

Main results (2.2) Sectors with the highest changes in R&D shares for the economies considered (ICB-3 digits; 2005-2013) The 5 sectors with the highest increases in R&D shares The 5 sectors with the highest dencreases in R&D shares Region ICB Sector Tech. Group R&D Delta R&D Int. ICB Sector Tech. Group R&D Delta R&D Int. Banks Low 3.0% 2.1% Chemicals Medium/High -2.8% 2.1% Automobiles & parts Medium/High 1.8% 5.5% Technology & Hardware High -2.7% 14.6% EU General industrials Medium/High 1.6% 5.5% Leisure goods High -2.3% 2.6% Industrial engineering Medium/High 1.6% 4.3% Electronic Medium/High -1.9% 5.0% Software & computer High 1.0% 13.4% Aerospace & defence Medium/High -1.6% 5.8% Software & computer High 6.3% 12.4% Automobiles & parts Medium/High -4.9% 3.8% Industrial engineering Medium/High 1.1% 3.2% Pharma & biotech High -2.2% 15.8% USA General retailers Medium/Low 0.7% 3.2% Leisure goods High -1.2% 5.3% Electronic Medium/High 0.6% 4.2% General industrials Medium/High -0.6% 3.3% Fixed line telecom Medium/Low 0.6% 1.2% Aerospace & defence Medium/High -0.4% 3.4% Pharma & biotech High 5.6% 20.4% Technology & Hardware High -12.0% 5.3% General industrials Medium/High 4.1% 3.7% Leisure goods High -4.8% 8.8% Japan Software & computer High 2.5% 4.7% Fixed line telecom Medium/Low -1.3% 2.3% Automobiles & parts Medium/High 2.3% 4.2% Electricity Low -0.9% 4.8% Electronic Medium/High 1.7% 4.8% Construction & materials Low -0.4% 1.6% Leisure goods High 8.6% 5.5% Automobiles & parts Medium/High -6.1% 1.8% Technology & Hardware High 2.8% 3.6% Electronic Medium/High -4.9% 4.1% Asian Tigers Industrial engineering Medium/High 1.0% 0.5% Mobile telecom Low -2.9% 1.6% Oil & gas producers Low 0.9% 0.3% Electricity Low -0.8% 0.9% Fixed line telecom Medium/Low 0.8% 1.6% Industrial Transport Low -0.7% - Construction & materials Low 21.0% 1.2% Oil & gas producers Low -55.5% 0.4% Automobiles & parts Medium/High 10.8% 1.9% China Industrial engineering Medium/High 9.7% 2.7% General industrials Medium/High 2.6% 1.5% Banks Low 2.3% 2.4% Software & computer High 5.2% 10.2% Pharma & biotech High -6.2% 14.8% Aerospace & defence Medium/High 4.8% 8.1% General industrials Medium/High -4.1% 1.7% RoW Banks Low 3.2% 3.0% Electronic Medium/High -2.8% 4.5% Oil & gas producers Low 2.9% 0.4% Food producers Medium/Low -2.3% 1.8% Automobiles & parts Medium/High 2.1% 3.3% Technology & Hardware High -1.6% 10.4%

Main results (3.1) Age of top corporate R&D investors, differences among regions and sectors; 2005-2013 What "explains" age variance? Sector = 41.4% Region = 29.8% Other factors = 28.8% Regions: US companies are younger than EU and Japanese Chinese companies are the youngest Age (dummy region) All sectors Age (dummy region and sector) Regions EU = baseline Asian Tigers -34.91*** -31.21*** (4.44) (3.27) China -53.34*** -66.13*** (5.99) (4.32) Japan 2.94-1.48 (2.42) (1.77) Rest of the World -13.91*** -14.22*** (2.72) (1.99) USA -23.68*** -26.20*** (2.32) (1.73) Sector Dummies Included Constant 65.79*** 61.71*** (1.48) (4.76) Observations 578 578 R-squared 0.298 0.712 The substantial difference in the average age of firms is due to sectors specificities

Main results (3.2) Average year of foundation of top R&D firms and their years' variation by sectors (ICB-4 digits, 2013) 9

Main results (4) Number and size of top R&D firms, EU and US in Software and Computer Services sector; 2005-13 Software & Computer Services 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Companies - No. 14 19 17 16 17 16 13 13 14 EU R&D average - million 167 165 199 225 229 259 310 359 360 Employees - average No. 7939 9479 9538 12917 12287 12840 13447 14848 16852 Companies - No. 50 52 44 43 45 45 46 47 53 US R&D average - million 330 361 469 521 483 526 615 678 656 Employees - average No. 13889 14584 18297 19460 18912 19864 23051 21215 20178 Higher number of larger US firms in this young, growing and high R&D-intensive sector compared to the EU since the beginning of the period of observation

SUMMARY & CONCLUSIONS (i) EU maintained its R&D investment share vis-à-vis other world regions, and somewhat improved its position vs. US and Japan (ii) Slightly higher EU R&D shift over sectors compared to the US However, both economies show a slower pace of change compared to the emerging economies. Contrary to previous studies comparing EU vs US, based on data from 80ies and 90ies (e.g. Gambardella et al., 2007; Foray and Lhuillery, 2010) (iii) The typology of sectors determines the average age of top R&D investing firms Can be coupled with Cincera & Veugelers (2013) study, where most of the EU R&D investment gap vs US is due to a different sectoral composition of "yollies" (iv) EU's "follower behaviour" in new high-tech growing sectors ('software & computer s.'): less & smaller firms than the US Key role of the presence of young and growing innovative firms when new high-tech 11 markets emerge (Ackermann, 2012; Czarnitzki & Delanote, 2012).

IMPLICATIONS FOR R&I POLICY Aiming at a sectors mix with more knowledge-intensive sectors in the EU - to reduce the R&D intensity gap -: (a) Target new (more risky), strategic R&D-intensive sectors i.e. "young innovative emerging sectors" (YiES) (b) Favour entrepreneurship to create innovative EU firms in these new sectors and make them growing. This would increase the probability that the new champions of tomorrow will be European companies, ensuring in turn a better sectors mix and dynamics. 12

Thank you Pietro.Moncada-Paterno-Castello@ec.europa.eu Economics of Industrial Research & Innovation European Commission JRC-IPTS s Knowledge for Growth Unit Edf. Expo, Calle Inca Garcilaso n. 3 41092 Seville (Spain) Acknowledgements: - Antonio Vezzani, as well as Alex Coad and Nicola Grassano (European Commission, JRC-IPTS) - European Commission, DGRTD and JRC collaborative project "IRIMA" More information can be found here: Industrial Research and Innovation website: http://iri.jrc.ec.europa.eu/ IPTS - Institute for Prospective Technological Studies: http://ipts.jrc.ec.europa.eu/ JRC - Joint Research Centre: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/jrc/index.cfm 13

Technological sector groups High R&D intensity sectors (R&D intensity above 5%) include e.g. Pharmaceuticals & biotechnology; Health care equipment & services; Technology hardware & equipment; Software & computer services; Aerospace & defence. Medium-high R&D intensity sectors (between 2% and 5%) include e.g. Electronics & electrical equipment; Automobiles & parts; Industrial engineering & machinery; Chemicals; Personal goods; Household goods; General industrials; Support services. Medium-low R&D intensity sectors (between 1% and 2%) include e.g. Food producers; Beverages; Travel & leisure; Media; Oil equipment; Electricity; Fixed line telecommunications. Low R&D intensity sectors (less than 1%) include e.g. Oil & gas producers; Industrial metals; Construction & materials; Food & drug retailers; Transportation; Mining; Tobacco; Multi-utilities; Banks. Source:European Commission (2014) following OECD (1997) approach Industry classification: ICB (Industry Classification Benchmark), 3-digit level 14

Descriptive statistics R&D investments of top 1000 companies ( million) region_analysis 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Asian Tigers 12117.9 12571.6 14154.8 17137.0 18442.4 21529.5 22952.2 24947.5 26944.3 China 984.0 1254.3 1562.5 2806.0 6030.9 7960.8 12727.3 14436.9 16261.8 EU 100980.8 108984.2 116324.3 121817.8 120667.1 127156.1 138392.3 148898.9 151524.7 Japan 65789.5 67959.0 76183.7 79924.2 79225.5 72184.0 96494.9 95808.4 78581.2 Rest of the World 20082.9 22517.2 25730.3 30752.6 31191.9 31298.5 37850.4 40326.1 39825.7 USA 124638.9 136428.1 147777.4 154158.9 137614.1 149018.3 165724.4 176777.9 177820.6 Total 324594.1 349714.5 381733 406596.3 393171.9 409147.2 474141.5 501195.7 490958.3 Share of R&D investments of top 1000 companies region_analysis 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Asian Tigers 4% 4% 4% 4% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% China 0.3% 0.4% 0.4% 0.7% 2% 2% 3% 3% 3% EU 31% 31% 30% 30% 31% 31% 29% 30% 31% Japan 20% 19% 20% 20% 20% 18% 20% 19% 16% Rest of the World 6% 6% 7% 8% 8% 8% 8% 8% 8% USA 38% 39% 39% 38% 35% 36% 35% 35% 36% Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Companies in the Top 1000 region_analysis 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Asian Tigers 54 55 52 61 66 64 56 61 59 China 5 4 5 12 16 18 34 39 46 EU 253 283 297 267 288 282 282 289 297 Japan 195 183 186 209 199 202 213 190 168 Rest of the World 75 70 75 83 92 97 93 96 104 USA 418 405 385 368 339 337 322 325 326 Total 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 Share of Companies in the Top 1000 region_analysis 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Asian Tigers 5% 6% 5% 6% 7% 6% 6% 6% 6% China 0.5% 0.4% 0.5% 1% 2% 2% 3% 4% 5% EU 25% 28% 30% 27% 29% 28% 28% 29% 30% Japan 20% 18% 19% 21% 20% 20% 21% 19% 17% Rest of the World 8% 7% 8% 8% 9% 10% 9% 10% 10% USA 42% 41% 39% 37% 34% 34% 32% 33% 33% Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Year of foundation - ICB-4 digits Top R&D companies (2013) ICB4digit Sector Year of foundation Average St.dev. Median Firms Internet 1999 4.6 1999 13 Software 1991 10.3 1992 52 Biotechnology 1988 20.4 1993 30 Semiconductors 1985 18.3 1989 72 Computer Hardware 1985 24.8 1988 32 Computer Services 1984 31.0 1997 21 Fixed Line Telecommunications 1973 41.9 1994 15 Telecommunications Equipment 1970 44.3 1991 39 Electronic Equipment 1967 29.3 1974 53 Health Care Equipment & Services 1967 38.1 1977 43 Oil & Gas Producers 1962 39.2 1972 19 Leisure Goods 1960 37.9 1968 19 Industrial Metals & Mining 1959 51.1 1985 15 Commercial Vehicles & Trucks 1959 48.2 1982 23 Food Producers 1956 47.2 1961 20 Pharmaceuticals 1956 42.7 1964 70 Aerospace & Defence 1955 39.8 1960 33 Electricity 1954 20.7 1951 10 Automobiles & Parts 1953 42.0 1948 75 Chemicals 1947 45.4 1949 56 Electrical Components & Equipment 1946 47.5 1950 23 Construction & Materials 1945 83.6 1956 19 General Industrials 1944 37.1 1939 29 Household Goods & Home Construction 1942 42.3 1953 11 Industrial Machinery 1939 63.9 1958 52 Personal Goods 1934 37.5 1930 14 Banks 1908 95.1 1955 20 16

Average age Including Base sector fixed effects Median age Including Base sector fixed effects EU = baseline Asian Tigers -34.91*** -31.21*** -25.23*** -23.72*** (4.44) (3.27) (4.89) (3.79) China -53.34*** -66.13*** -44.08*** -54.50*** (5.99) (4.32) (6.60) (5.01) Japan 2.94-1.48 12.25*** 8.06*** (2.42) (1.77) (2.67) (2.05) Rest of the World -13.91*** -14.22*** -17.17*** -21.04*** (2.72) (1.99) (3.00) (2.31) USA -23.68*** -26.20*** -20.82*** -26.61*** (2.32) (1.73) (2.56) (2.01) Sector fixed effects (a) 0.000*** 0.000*** Constant 65.79*** 61.71*** 55.43*** 67.41*** (1.48) (4.76) (1.63) (5.52) Observations 578 578 578 578 R-squared 0.298 0.712 0.274 0.670 F-test 48.67 23.92 43.21 19.69 RMSE 20.94 14.04 23.07 16.26 Standard errors in parentheses *** p<0.01, ** p<0.05, * p<0.1 17 (a) Reported is the p-value of an F-test of joint significance for the sector fixed effects (ICB3digit)